Legal analyst reacts to judge denying Karen Read defense’s motion to dismiss

[@AceMoonshot]

I wasn't surprised. She is just an awful, awful judge. The corrupt cops knew they could count on her and she wasn't going to let them down.

[@101less]

The judge and prosecutors office are outrageously out of line in this case and their egos are overriding any actual interest in justice that you'd expect both to have. An appeal was coming either way, so the judge rules for the prosecution side to show her belief in Law Enforcement and the Prosecution, instead of actually caring about Read's rights or justice.

[@PostalWorker14]

Ya think ? Obviously corrupt

[@Paul1958R]

cannone is 100 percent corrupt

[@GML_123.]

The appellate court will never call this jury back into to read the verdict, after it said it was hung . never never never going to happen.

[@PostalWorker14]

@@GML_123. Either jury screwed up or judge misled jury maybe I wasn’t watching the whole trial and don’t know what sidebars were about

[@Paul1958R]

All LE is MA is corrupt

[@TheJewellian]

Whatever minimal thoughts I had of Auntie Bev possibly being a good judge are now gone. One has to wonder if she is being controlled in some way. I know she hates Karen but this decision is ridiculous.

[@CharlieLynne-143]

She is not interested in justice and despises Karen and her team. She is a black eye to the justice system. Shame on her.

[@amygentry6060]

As Canton turns she is linked to the mcabes😮

[@tgfabthunderbird1]

Cannone manuevered the case. She couldn't help the prosecution, so muddied the waters. The appeal is a given.

[@sibelc.380]

Your guest is very smart and rational!Thank you!'

[@Crikey-sunbeam]

She’s compromised through her brother representing Chis Albert in DUI death

[@eriksmith2514]

The judge doesn't need to interview the jurors. The legal question is whether the judge showed a "manifest necessity" for a mistrial, not whether a verdict was reached. If the counts were separate (not lesser-included), logic dictates that the judge show a manifest necessity for each count separately. The judge did not do that. The second case should be dismissed entirely.

[@lorikremer2709]

You are correct in your assessment yet "logic" has not dictated in this courtroom. Logic relies on piecing facts together in determining guilt and it is astounding this case even made it to trial. From the DA to the police to the judge, facts meant little.

[@cathycollier6869]

She’s corrupt

[@caroline-brisbane8577]

Why take a deal for manslaughter when you are innocent

[@Elsley12]

Because she’s guilty? I think so.

[@caroline-brisbane8577]

@@Elsley12 I haven't seen any evidence that John's injury's were from a motor vehicle.

[@Elsley12]

@@caroline-brisbane8577 don’t need evidence when it’s evident. KR needs to testify, period.. the defence concocted the most absurd case ever in history, worse than Robert Telles.

[@gerrysullivan5797]

HOS LONG TO DESTROY A PHONE AFTER BUTT DIALING ?

[@DorothyKeoseian]

😂😂😂

[@donnakehoe478]

This guy is the first expert ive seen talk sense . Bev is a disgrace

[@HeatherStein-qi2gn]

I have seen several legal experts say at the very least she should have spoken to the jury. Quite a few are scathing of the prosecution and say they should dismiss counts 1 and 3. Some can't believe it was prosecuted in the first place.

[@etomidatesuccinylcholine]

Excellent analyst

[@sarahburnham7197]

Confusion?? No. Crookedness.

[@endavi1214]

This judge is plainly biased against Karen Read and should not be allowed to sit on the next trial.

[@carolyncollins7859]

Definitely biased and prejudice against karen

[@millipedic]

But it won't happen. The state will double down and Karen Read will serve hard time, probably 20-30 years.

[@amegojoseph6856]

Aunty Bev has got to be related to some of the prosecutions witnesses?

[@mamacita8688]

Auntie Bev held Lally's hand the whole way through the trial she should've recused herself from. She's NOT going to dismiss anything - anyone who watched a single day of the trial knows that.

[@carolyncollins7859]

She is a pretty bad judge. She has been prejudice since the very beginning.

[@andrewousley1685]

Even though it's going to be another trial prosecution still won't win everyone has to come back .

[@VictorMendez-l6u]

i think you will be surprised

[@afrodeity1576]

Thanks 🙏 for having an excellent guest who talks sense unlike Court TV.

[@amylynn732]

The confusion is 100% due to dishonorable Judge Canonne's verbal instructions to the jurors, which she stated supersede the written instructions. She stated the jurors must not share their decisions with her or anyone else until they come to a unanimous decision on the charges so they did not fill out the jury form or make any indication in their note to her about what they were hung on and why there was no mention of decisions on some counts. I believe the judge orchestrated this outcome because she knew they could not get a slam dunk guilty verdict, and I believe this is not the first time she did this. I hope the FBI and DOJ look into her.

[@amygentry6060]

This judge was rude to an extent , irritated, n very bias...throw her out conflict of interest..

[@sibelc.380]

I believe judge knew the not guilty verdicts and she chose not to declare it! If you watch the video you'll understand how she finished it in a seconds...

[@PhillyBirdGang1]

Can’t they just send Bev to the Old Age Home with her bribery payout?

[@VictorMendez-l6u]

you are like everywhere

[@PhillyBirdGang1]

@@VictorMendez-l6u 😊

[@Theofficialgolfer]

Note to self, don’t live in Massachusetts 😂

[@joannebrown4073]

Who are the prosecution going to have as witnesses. They will be allegedly not available. The jury form looked confusing x

[@bryanmurphy3035]

“Surprised?” I can’t believe how stupid the attorneys are analyzing this case. It’s embarrassing. wtf?

[@larscederberg8564]

The judge is in on the fix

[@cathym6726]

Thank you!! The judge told them they had to agree on all charges before they could fill out the jury slip. Not guilty on counts 1 and 3. She did not ask if they agreed on any of the 3 charges....

[@piperj4978]

This young woman newscaster asks good questions....I like how she lets him answer and then asks another good question 😊

[@lisaroberts131]

Very good explanation now we wait😊

[@carolyncollins7859]

I’m glad to hear you say it does have something to do with DJ. I didn’t see it since no formal decision was made.

[@stephwiller9089]

I still don't understand why the jury didn't fill out the forms they agreed on. I really don't understand why the jury wasn't polled. I've NEVER heard / seen a judge and lawyers not ask for the jury to be polled. At the very least the judge always asks if they were able to come to an agreement on any charges.

[@darshaniweerapura3108]

Very clear explanation love it

[@pascalepierloot]

Coulde, woulde, shoulde...This case was one chain of deliberate sabotage, dubious investigation and underhanded tactics. How these people have no shame of telling us al these blatant lies and cover for each other, is really disgusting

[@coffeecake1803]

She’s Nit Guilty period.

[@WhiteRose360-ji8wc]

I recommend watching Brother Council’s channel, he goes through the case laws that the Judge ruled on !

[@carriegentz9236]

With a different Judge

[@Joh605]

They should of asked while on duty not after

[@LiveinPortland-r8q]

Well this is Monday who is suing Karen Reed now who is suing

[@robynholliday4794]

Sack Cannone

[@Elsley12]

Go back to law school, there was no verdict and the defence welcomed a mistrial.

[@ElevateTheProcess]

The jurors that “came forward” did not sign affidavits. The only affidavit was signed by a juror requesting anonymity out of fear for her and her family’s safety. The Defense consented to the declaration of a mistrial so this was expected. Justice for Officer John O'Keefe.

[@babs3652]

Good decision by judge Cannone.

[@Ji5-24]

Alleged! This guest ignores that fact. There was no proof and over 200 years of case laws prove the judge got it right to dismiss it. Well done Judge Canone!

[@michelletaylor4211]

Case laws are created do issues such as this. In my opinion, Bevs charge and the verdict form were very confusing. She specifically stated, "Do not complete the form until you have a unanimous verdict." Her words, not mine.

[@Ji5-24]

@@michelletaylor4211 I’ve heard that before but no one ever points exactly to when she actually said that (day and time stamp) and the defense didn’t rely upon it, so evidently not an issue at all.

[@michelletaylor4211]

@user-ji5gz5fu3g Watch day 31 starting at about 3:26 .

[@Ji5-24]

@@michelletaylor4211 Ok. When I get time will do. Thanks

[@lindat3607]

Good call by the judge. The defense said they talked to four jurists, what about the others? Maybe they have a different story.

[@lesliefortie8347]

Then why haven't they come forward to contradict the ones that have come forward? And don't say they are worried about their identities being exposed and they are afraid of harrassment because the identities of the jurors that have come forward have not been exposed. There is an easy way to determine if the other 8 jurors agree with the original 4 jurors. Ask them! You can ask about that without having them discuss their deliberations. Also remember, the jurors tried to contact the CW as well and were ignored.

[@beegee5460]

And that might be, but we need to find out one way or the other. If that's true, so be it. But the truth must be known.

[@BrandonPack-tn5xn]

***GUILTY***

[@josephkain6213]

Dr. Strange's multidimentional portal from the Marvel universe.😂 But here on earth data don't lie, corrupt LE, McAlberts and imbecile familiars do. So which are you b?

[@williamgage4825]

Judge is corrupt 🤬