LEGO Twilight feels like a wasted opportunity

[@TheBrendNew]

Ok but Bella having 2 blank faces is a very accurate design choice

[@dunkelhei7]

Lolllllll

[@BrysonRitchie]

Wonder why Lego decided to get rid of so much of the foliage. It feels like it really takes away from the character and sense of place the original build had

[@SO-ym3zs]

The fewer the parts and the more they charge, the more money they make. It definitely feels ripped out of context now.

[@R0Sch88]

Because they can't design trees. The only time a LEGO Designer did a tree right was the Bonsai Tree, everything else was just a cylinder with some sparse foliage. TLG should hire an arborist for once.

[@rubenestradavalencia3306]

@@R0Sch88do you believe this applies to rivendell’s trees?

[@clockwork3494]

The set definitely could've benefited from being a bit bigger too and in turn an actual garage could've been included and acted as a way to store the pickup truck. Instead it's fake and leads to the big open room on the lower floor which feels rather jarring and odd for a set intended for adults. The original was definitely way too big imo but now this one feels way too small, wish they could've gotten a sweet spot between the two because despite my disinterest in the IP, it's actually a really cool looking house.

[@emeralddreamer7738]

My main issue is them not including all Cullens. It's 1 set, first and last. So why not include Esme, Emet and Jasper? It's not like we're going to get them in another set, so why? WHY?!

[@littlejonathorn6860]

Maybe there will be another set? Besides; we don’t have the cliff, the baseball scene, the jeep, Victoria’s coven (maybe add Riley for fun) Def. agree; bummer that Esme, Emet and Jasper aren’t included. (I just made my own today. Wish I could send pictures)

[@gracesun9825]

This absolutely kills me! I still want it though.

[@littlejonathorn6860]

@@gracesun9825 its an awesome set in my opinion even with its minor setbacks.

[@robertobolanos8892]

It IS generally good, but the main problem IS the kack of vegetation, because IS supposed to be in a forest. Also the Brown colour, too orange

[@lilyzzworld]

It feels like they were most concerned with how fun the build would be, compensated for it with unique angles, and forgot they were making a twilight set

[@clockwork3494]

I think making it a bit bigger would've helped too, the whole playset idea is fine but I really dislike how the garage is fake and instead leads to the lower floor room. Just having it big enough to include a garage would've been nice because without one it just feels kind of.. cheap?

[@rosscalhoun3389]

The house its based on is from my hometown, so I kind of want it just for that. But l'd probably only grab it for cheap on the second-hand market. I will say, the color is actually closer to real life. The movies used filters.

[@MartyBecker]

I agree. The dark orange color represents the light wood color on the real house better than the dark brown color used in the original Ideas submission.

[@17denby]

⁠@@MartyBeckertry but the set is based on the television. Not real life.

[@Jackieooo]

@17denbyit looked moody in the first film because of the editing and the editing in the last movies it’s more true to life. The designer was keeping this into consideration and went with how it looks in real life and as much as I love the moodiness I think she made the best decision!

[@isaachunsberger2484]

Even if i don't care about Twighlight, the original model seemed intriguing to me just based on the build. Now, primarily because of the color scheme, this set went from a potential buy to a hard pass.

[@funtyes1970]

you going lose out very good investment. your choice, I guess Lego can't keep all fans happy.

[@BrotherhoodWorkshop]

4:24 "Bella has an ever so slightly different blank face" .......I mean..... that's just being faithful to the source material.

[@Al-Akram92]

I've never _not_ wanted to own an Icons set more than this one

[@marekr2987]

it's ideas actually

[@gracesun9825]

It's always the right time for Twilight anything! 😆

[@littlejonathorn6860]

If you think about it. Its difficult to make every set perfect unless they make it expensive or cut certain elements or add or subtract things. There is always a tradeoff. As far as I go in my opinion, I just made custom cullens that were missing (today) with a jeep. Will add to the main set once it comes in. Emmett, Jasper, Esme and three antagonists- hoping we get a set, one more set.

[@tomjames9681]

4:19 To the designers’ credit, Bella’s emotional range in the movie isn’t massive…

[@paradoxalrose5787]

My largest issue was that the cullens just look like regular people? Like vampires and they aren’t even slightly more pale? I’m glad they have reversible face prints, but my overall take on the set is that the moody feel of the original design being tamed down removes the “twilight” feel. Twilight was moody, the new version feels altogether less

[@alyssapreza]

I get that, but I feel like it’s kinda the point. They’re vampires trying to blend in to the human world, the SHOULD look like humans.

[@homegrump]

Subscriber earned. Im tired of Lego "influencers" who would never dare say the very constructive criticism we see here.

[@aquestforthetruth1653]

It was always going to be the right time for twilight😂

[@Joe-cr6uq]

It’s tough to make modern architecture not look bland and basic in Lego form. I think the designer did her best.

[@dicloniusgames]

One of the few complaints I have after seeing the final images is the missing characters like the rest of the Cullen family and Victoria & James. I do agree too that the final version does look a tad basic vs. the Ideas submission. I still want to get it because I have plans for a pop culture shelf and this would be considered pop culture in my opinion. Even if it would've driven up the price another $20-$40, having the entire family and the two main antagonists in the first film would've brought the set to life a bit more and given it more playability & scene creation.

[@bloodymarvelous4790]

The original submission only had four characters, so LEGO expanded on the fan designer's design already. I understand everybody wants every character from the movie, but 7 minifigs in a $220 set is not lacking in the slightest.

[@dicloniusgames]

@@bloodymarvelous4790 To me it's more about authenticity. Even if we only got Victoria & James and not the rest of the family and they found a way to keep it at $220. I don't want the non-important characters, just give me Victoria & James (maybe there'd be a way to custom build them after the set's released with other released minifig parts. That way they're in the set even if not officially in it, you know?)

[@koryggg]

@@bloodymarvelous4790i 100% agree I was bummed some Cullens were missing but also thought about how the original had way less figs

[@littlejonathorn6860]

@@bloodymarvelous4790Good point, however have you ever seen a star wars lego set without the main characters? Example: Lukes Team, without chewbacca or Han Solo? It dosen’t happen. Also missing; Jasper, Emmett, Esme and main antagonists (James, Victoria and Laurent)

[@littlejonathorn6860]

@@dicloniusgames good idea 👍

[@craezee]

not enough minifigs, they should have made all of the Cullens plus Bella and not include Jacob and Charlie. it is the Cullen house after all, so why not have all of them around.

[@BDD_Builds]

I care not for the source material, but it looks like a nice modern house that would fit well into a LEGO city. And I'm always a fan of getting more flesh-tonned minifigure parts into the catalogue.

[@dustyfedora]

I think my main gripe with the foliage was that the main tree went from a large brick built pine/spruce style tree that towers over the house to the new standardized Lego pine tree that’s made with bars and 1x1 leaf pieces that barely shorter than the house Like there’s nothing wrong with that style of tree but in comparison to what we could’ve gotten it’s kinda disappointing

[@turtlefinland]

Good points. Missed opportunity BUT maybe a ok MOC possibility.

[@Jackieooo]

The newer version looks more accurate to the actual house! As a twilight fan new to Lego I love this set and can’t wait to expand it!! Im already making so many plans!! I do agree that Bella should have had a mouth open version but I still love it! I think this is a perfect time for a twilight set we’re getting a animated series in a couple years and should be getting a new book from Stephenie this year!!

[@MSalvadorStudios]

i love this design wish the wood was a little darker but other than it looks great, also i agree it needs more vegetation i just plan to buy a bunch of those tree leaves and build more pines around the house

[@welcomestranger]

The big boring slab of plain brown in the middle has left me underwhelmed compared to the prototype.

[@homegrump]

Its true. When I saw the images, It took me a good look to realise what this set was. It just doesnt have the vibe of twilight. Also, I wish they opened up the back, it would make the set cheaper and give us more acessability. The living room behind the garage door just feels wrong.

[@xtra98]

100% agree with everything you said. As someone that works for an Architect and designs custom houses I was really looking forward to the Twilight house set. Just viewing the content online something feels off with the revealed set compared to the original submitted idea. I don't know if the top level is too squished, the exterior looks very flat, trees also looked great in the submitted set (similar to A-frame). and was the piano always in the garage? I see why they did that but I would have rathered a full garage, I guess if we wanted something scaled to a full house like Home Alone we would also be looking at a higher cost.. but this just feels off to me for a $280 CAD price.

[@littlejonathorn6860]

Piano: Supposed to be in Edwards room and not in the Garage. Garage: Wish it was useable for the Cullen car and jeep Trees: Yes! 100% agree. Exterior does look a little flat or rushed

[@maddadbricks]

I just jumped over to see what light the Fan Media reveal had to add and the designer Laura said that the house and interior of the movie set changed from film to film. They have tried to stay true to the films rather than the actual real-life house. That said, I still agree with your initial impressions of this. But watch Laura's presentation and you can see from her body language that this real house vs film adaptation problem caused a lot of suffering. She's still obviously very proud and excited.

[@TheRandompaint]

A non functional garage door is hard pass for me

[@littlejonathorn6860]

With no Jeep and missing 3 main cullens and main antagonists

[@jemmel87]

I agree with everything you said in this video. I have been anxiously awaiting this set for the last 13 months and found myself somewhat deflated when I saw the images. I remain hopeful, but I have to wait until after the actual build for my final analysis. I’m really hoping to be pleasantly surprised!

[@kentslocum]

This is a great discussion about a not-so-great set.

[@Josh_Greathouse]

I feel like most people will buy it for the city, not for the fandom

[@littlejonathorn6860]

Bought for Fandom

[@Josh_Greathouse]

@littlejonathorn6860 glad to be proven wrong. Enjoy

[@natalievision]

Rebrickable will make it better, make it appealing.

[@georgeetboom7719]

I would live a twilight Lego game, think it’s the best for adaptation, al the locations, the characters the “big battles” it’s an easy plot to understand with little cut scenes

[@noahward5804]

Well said! Not overly critical. And your Bella mockup was better too. They cut almost 1000 pieces from the original design which makes it more squished, too… not sure how that would have changed the already higher price though.

[@littlejonathorn6860]

Lego squished to make more affordable I guess.

[@SusanGaskin]

Great video! I'm glad you referenced the recent Lego City and Friends' sets that are similar modern houses. The Lego City set definitely reminds me of this build. It's really beautiful, but pricey (and I already own the other two modern houses referenced earlier), so will only buy it at a discounted price.

[@BeanzStudioz]

i honestly dont care about the fact that its twilight i just realy like the house

[@BrickHQ]

I see what you mean I hope we get more fully enclosed houses like this

[@TheKennyGM]

they made it worse x'D

[@Auzrill]

I'm not a huge fan of twilight but I was gonna get this set cause I liked the look of the house... But this version is not as good looking. What's with all the brown?

[@djserious9341]

Yeah. I agree. This was a missed opportunity. I love good modern architecture.

[@JustSmilinn]

I'm glad someone said it. I have no idea what this new house is, disappointed....

[@clockwork3494]

I think my two biggest issues with this set are A) lack of foliage and B) size. I won't say the original submission was an ideal size as I do think it was a really big shelf queen, but this one feels way too small in comparison and it really shows. I think that's in part due to the garage space now being taken up by the lounge room or piano.. room(?) which creates a visually jarring effect of fake garage door leading to the open space with the piano. It feels like the designing team's main focus was spent making this set more alike a playset, which while it isn't a bad thing on paper I think as a result it's been "dumbed down" a tad too much which is only made worse by the fact this is intended to be an adult oriented set. It's still cool, but I think it could've been better between that sweet spot of small lego city house and big shelf queen, at the very least a bigger tree and functional garage should've been standard.

[@csullivancox]

Has anyone noticed the piano is in the garage!? That is an egregious cheat!

[@arghjayem]

04:08 I don’t know I think the minifigures look more emotive and emotional than either Robert Pattison or Kristen Stewart have in any of their films! 😂

[@McPilch]

The original design looked sooooo good... this set - in my irrelevant opinion as I've not seen/read any Twilight - is a horrible final version. Even if the actual real home is closer to dark orange than dark brown, the dark orange in Lego does not work at all. And this just feels "less," even if Lego has improved the indoor furnishing.

[@octav1600]

The house doesn't look bad (and I think the lighter tone works better with other LEGO houses). However, this was a missed opportunity to re-use the wolfpack wolf in brown instead of the brickbuilt abomination. I will pass on this, but I was never going to buy it even if it were much better. Maybe one day when I start doing city / town as well ??

[@littlejonathorn6860]

Would of been cool to get Jacob with muscle torso and green pants/shorts

[@ALLinHerMovements]

That set will be good for a modular moc.

[@aslamc9288]

Perhaps, but as someone who is a huge fan of modern architecture and not at all a fan of Twilight, I’m very excited for this set as a piece of architectural beauty (I was considering the Modern House 31153, but the fact it was a narrow open playset kept me away), especially as a house for my sigfig and his customized Speed Champions DB5 cabriolet. And the fact the minifigs are a bit generic works for me, since I don’t know the characters’ names or their significance, they will make for good mix and match pieces for my Lego city.

[@SO-ym3zs]

You should check out the Hea On Jea Modern Villa set (released by a couple different manufacturers).

[@funtyes1970]

I'm not even Twilight fan but I like look of this set . I think this set going to be very good for investment just like stranger things upside down house.

[@SaviorMachine84]

I've not watched twilight, but why would vampires even live in a home with lots of windows?

[@killerjack144]

That’s a major plot point in the story. The Cullens live in northern Washington, where it’s cloudy 90% of the year, so they can live normally/go outside/live in a house with giant windows.

[@moniquesweb]

Also, sunlight just makes them sparkle. No joke, just sparkle.

[@louvienne531]

Yeah I agree. Very basic very bland, and the original submission is 1000000000x better

[@SO-ym3zs]

That's true of almost every Lego Ideas submission. They nerf or botch the original when turning it into an official set :(

[@bloodymarvelous4790]

@@SO-ym3zs Like which ones? Almost all Ideas sets have been improved upon from the original design. The only ones I can think of where I prefer the original submissions are the Orient Express and the A-Frame Cabin. Sets that I feel were improved by LEGO: Jaws, The Nightmare Before Christmas, Insects, Motorized Lighthouse, Old Fishing Store, Pirates of Barracuda Bay, Phone Box, Tales of the Space Age, Grand Piano, Saturn V, ISS, Green Hill Zone, Fender, Globe, Typewriter.

[@SO-ym3zs]

@@bloodymarvelous4790 The Orient Express would be Exhibit A, surely. The Botanical Garden was far superior in its original incarnation. The Medieval Blacksmith, assuming your prefer a more realistic BlueBrixx style for your medieval sets. The D&D set...

[@JulianCooke-yn5lh]

This was a house that really needed to be done really well, as you indicate. This was a once only opportunity missed. Colours are awful. Not interested.

[@hayfanihidayaturachman4142]

for the first time, ive been feel if the origin project will get so much change, cause there is so many peaces and the color lack of contrast.

[@jeffc4862]

I don't care about the 'Twilight' angle - it's a decent "Modern" house design that many will buy just to add to their City...

[@notnoahgamez9188]

Does anybody know of this will only be sold for a short amount of time or there’s only a limited amount of them? Because I was really wanting to get this but it’s $219 and was wondering if I had time to wait

[@plethorabricks3165]

Yes its bland. Prefer older houses with more character in lego form. The Tudor Corner house is so beautiful by comparison!

[@bloodymarvelous4790]

Thank God LEGO sells that one as well.

[@BrotherhoodWorkshop]

Hot take. Aesthetically speaking, modern houses are just the worst.

[@MossyRiverRock]

I’m fairly new to the fine details of the house, I have watched all the films. I’m the designer interview/reveal, they said in the films the house set ext and int. changes about 3 or 4 times, could this have something to do with the discrepancy in terms of color scheme etc.?

[@stepet]

I have never seen the serie and I don't care about the serie but it looks like a nice modern house for adults. I could just put all the minifigures inside and pretend that's it's just a modern house...

[@5uck3rfr33]

I would like the build instructions for the original mock up. The official LEGO version looks horrible by comparison. Personally I don't think the final result was a fault of the designer. Instead I think the resulting product is due to constrains imposed by either the LEGO group or the licensing.

[@caronmills8983]

The original submission again is far better than the produced version. What a waste. The picture of the wolf on the box looks as high as the bottom level of the house and out of scale 🤣 probably just the design

[@lucky81jewel]

Yes lego completely failed at this..the lego designer did a horrible job

[@martinfrench5527]

Totally agree, I thik they have really hashed this up. Colours and mood completely gone from the original submission. Looks like it has been dumb-downed for the 6+ market. It has lost all its sophistication

[@alisonbailey-c8u]

I agree on all counts. I have no interest in Twillight but as an architecture fan it’s disappointing. The truck is ok but nothing special, the figures are ok but nothing special and same for the actual building.

[@SO-ym3zs]

I love Modernist architecture, but this one looks so bland and boring and doesn't do justice to the original home.

[@godlydestroyer8658]

It looks like a very simple moc not a full sett

[@tynovel]

Watching this question, it made me wonder if how would a minifigure version of Matt look like. Does he have a sigfig?

[@Sean-me4fv]

Yeah I don't like it. The original design looks much more appealing to me.

[@cr1513]

I must admit (as someone who likes Twilight) it feels like Lego cut corners and cheaped out. I even get the impression that the re-designer did not enjoy adapting this set. 1) The full Cullen family isn’t even there; at least have the mom lol 2) Skin tones aren’t correct, just…nougat. 3) Expressions off; even Bella, the running joke of her having the expression of a Lego brick, is somehow off. Blank expressions, kissy faces, angsty faces, anything…a default smiley face is all wrong. 4) Stickers for a $200+ set? 5) House size and brown colors look off…the atmosphere of a rainy place is gone. 6) Jacob’s werewolf form looks terrible. Down there with the Dreamzzz 3-1’s. I’m still buying it…preordered. It’s not like they’ll ever release another Twilight set, but it’s a disappointment. Hope it looks better in person. I’d honestly prefer they delay it and fix it up, but that’s unlikely at this stage.

[@smurf730]

The colours wrong

[@arctsunami8921]

I completely agree with the disappointing build, and the printed eyes on the wolf seriously don’t look right in the pictures hopefully that could change in person but who knows it’s still so bleh now

[@julienleischke]

I love how lego always makes the final set so much smaller. If it was put out by any competitor of lego it would probably even bigger and cheaper as what the lego price is😂 Its sad that lego has so much potential but dosnt want to embrace it.

[@funtyes1970]

lol what competitor there no Lego competitors no one came close what Lego is doing. what you think them competitor companies you are talking about will pay the license name to make a Twilight brick set. 😂🤣😅

[@JohnSmith-kf8mv]

Let's make "blandified" are real word..... (checks google) oh wait, it IS a real word. 😁

[@brunixot1]

and the price of that?????? the price

[@starlord157]

Twilight ruined vampires with the sparkling skin…. Ruined….

[@ivannat1]

I was so hyped for this one coming out, and I’m so disappointed. It just looks so underwhelming

[@JoshAdcock-z9w]

I watched Twilight for the first time last year. The model looks so out of place on the uniform 18+ black box with that cheesy spotlight behind it. The color palette should have been much darker. Part of the fun of the original movie is that over-the-top Y2K emo/goth aesthetic. I bet the designers and builders of the set would have a lot of more with it if it retained some of that identity in the build and graphic design.

[@a9525]

It’s underwhelming. Yawn, this won’t sell well I think

[@SM-SM-SM-SM]

you said " Please doo-doo"

[@SO-ym3zs]

This misses the proportions of the original and looks really weak and blah. I just built another house in the woods set, the Funwhole Mountain Cabin, and it totally crushes this set (and has all prints and lights and is cheaper).

[@Wnessa46]

Agree overall, it turned out a bit bland. I was excited for this set, but for this price tag is should be more "wow". Typical set which does not feels like it worths the price (not because of piece count, just the feel is lacking). I still adore it

[@Oscar-ek2jx]

What are we even doing anymore. Who the hell wants these IPs in LEGO form when it comes out so uninteresting. Same with all the Sitcom sets

[@jooeyunu]

I would love to know who buys these sets

[@SO-ym3zs]

I wish Lego would ditch all their licensed IP sets and focus more on imaginative, original lines like they used to and like competing manufacturers are doing. We don't need Twilight or whatever, but tons of us would like more medieval sets, or pirates, or space, or the Old West. Thank goodness Funwhole, BlueBrixx, etc. have stepped in to fill those voids.

[@maddadbricks]

⁠yeah, spot on! LEGO are losing the popular race because of their reliance on licences.

[@coraldiamond1922]

@@maddadbricks Lego continues to sell very well. It’s not loosing its popularity just because it’s producing so many sets based on popular IPs compared to how they used to to just do their own thing. Anyone that claims otherwise has no clue what they are talking about. They wouldn’t keep looking for more licenses like this if it didn’t sell well.

[@coraldiamond1922]

@@SO-ym3zs sounds like your bootlicking those companies a bit.

[@brickblums]

Twilight is still very popular - my teens were watching the series just last week. But, they aren't LEGO fans, so I won't be buying this set. I was going to buy it based on the fan model, but the new one is awful and that buildable wolf looks terrible in my opinion. They are clearly trying to make the set appeal to kids, but that movie wasn't created for kids

[@Duckguyforever11]

It’s not perfect but Lego building designs are getting much better overall. Then you have themes like Star Wars that are getting worse besides their ucs line

[@SO-ym3zs]

For me, they've made some improvements, like the Friends Modern Mansion and the Tudor Corner but overall, they're seriously lagging behind Funwhole's recent modular buildings in terms of design and features.

[@bloodymarvelous4790]

I have never seen Twilight. I have absolutely no desire to ever see Twilight. But this set looks great to me. When looking at pictures of the actual house, LEGO's color scheme is spot on. The original design's colors may be what you see in the movie (I wouldn't know) as it is set at dusk or night probably. I think this makes a great companion piece to the Tree House and A-Frame Cabin. Not sure it will fit in an urban environment, but if you've got a forest area outside your city I think this will fit great.

[@koryggg]

If you were to see images of breaking dawn part 1 and 2 it's more spot on. The first film has a weird Grey tone over it the entire movie

[@henner777]

I think you’re being too tactful, this is bad, really bad.

[@slizgi86]

The set looks like a LEGO knockoff somehow...

[@rolout2233]

for me this looks like a set that you build after visit in lego store where you bought 3 cups of bricks and started building. boring and theme not many people care

[@Lbj79]

No interest in twilight, never seen it. Lucily therefore no interest in this. More money for bricklink design:)

[@georgecook83]

Finally? I guess.

[@douglasevans9599]

This looks worse than the original

[@Mateo-et3wl]

Modern architecture is bland and boring by design. We don't need more lego sets of modern architecture. Just build your own ugly glass cube

[@georgeetboom7719]

It looks bland, like a fan made it

[@martymcfly5707]

Completely agree with your thoughts on this set. I am not a Twilight fan, in any way whatsoever, but I feel like this set has been given to a non fan at LEGO and they’ve ruined it. Timing wise, you’ve hit the nail on the head. Wait 30 years or so like they did with BTTF and Goonies, then it might hit that nostalgia level.

[@FitFitFit22]

Agree. Bland. Could have had mini dolls too. Could have had an exclusive new colour molded wolf. Shoulda Coulda.🤠

[@plethorabricks3165]

Yes, agree!!

[@Miciah-j1v]

Tbh.. we dont get much so dont ruin the fact that were getting a total different type of lego instead of harry potter, starwars ect.

[@memyselftheone]

Since I not only dislike the Twilight IP, but I also really dislike modern architecture, I am staying far, far away from this set. Now: As for the 'blank face' of Bella... That actually perfectly represents Kristen Stewarts blank, soulless acting in the franchise. So yeah. 😅

[@ElenarMT]

I said the same! For $60 - $70 maybe OK. It's a bland house with very little to go for it. Bland truck and I honestly never care about Minifigures. But for $220, Holy hell no

[@bloodymarvelous4790]

You think $60-$70 is a reasonable price for 2,200 pieces?

[@SO-ym3zs]

@@bloodymarvelous4790 Funwhole and Pantasy sell sets with 2-3 thousand pieces for not much more than that, and their quality is as good as Lego, so yes, that's reasonable, particularly for a rather poor-looking set.

[@coraldiamond1922]

@@bloodymarvelous4790 I agree that this set wouldn’t be any cheaper in today’s market but I think they meant to say that there would have been a bigger market if the set wasn’t over £150.

[@CultivatedBunny]

Let’s be really here no set on earth would cost 60-70 for 2k piece set. Even if you go by the .10 cent a piece that’s still 200 for all 2k with out stickers

[@SO-ym3zs]

@CultivatedBunny 10 cents per piece is common for Lego, but the best competing brands sell sets that are every bit as good as Lego or better for 1/3: to 1/2 that price. Lego dramatically overcharges, and $60-70 with all prints is absolutely realistic and available if you're willing to hold Lego to a proper standard and not take their pricing at face value.

[@Myusernamehere33]

This thing sucks. Flop city.

[@chilltelamon4670]

Imo the lego version is actually better theres more color variation and more shape variation due to the 2nd story being a different length

[@c.l4219]

The set is boring compared to the original and I see again a lot of stickers.... So with that... There is nothing that says "twighlight" in this set.. I can rebuilt this with my existing bricks... Change some colours.. Doesn't even matter... As they don't care for true colours in this icon set anyway