From an 'old timer' who served in the World War 2 Carrier HMS ILLUSTRIOUS - this was most interesting - Still remember 'Hands to Flying Stations' and the Sea Fires taking off.
@oliver89287 жыл бұрын
Fascinating, when in the war did you serve on her?
@deeremeyer17496 жыл бұрын
World of Warships wars continuing to this day.
@FuZaHGB6 жыл бұрын
Sobertag He's not saying he served in WW2, he's saying he served on a ship which was built for WW2.
@romeo90175 жыл бұрын
Lets hope you didn't bump into Prince Andrew - he was a f*cking menace...
@Joe-fe4xi5 жыл бұрын
Jamraptor He’s not saying that he served during the war, but the ship was built in that period and for that purpose
@morganburns72896 жыл бұрын
My brother is the Scottish blonde one!!xx
@natwad16466 жыл бұрын
what's he up to now?
@MK-rr7cg6 жыл бұрын
Morgan Burns 3:00
@jamies62206 жыл бұрын
Well done him☺️
@lmclm17554 жыл бұрын
Morgan Burns: Loose lips sink ships.
@Omen00043 жыл бұрын
@@morganburns7289 is he still doing it today? What was his experience like?
@endomozart69277 жыл бұрын
Brazil bought him. A peaceful retirement...
@titus_philemon7 жыл бұрын
🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
@MK-rr7cg5 жыл бұрын
Her, ships are always female.
@jameswalker69075 жыл бұрын
I watched her leave britian as a Brazilian ship
@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm61143 жыл бұрын
@@MK-rr7cg thats sexist its 2022 this is AN ABSOLUTE OUTRAGE YOU HAVE ANGEREDED many peoples
@nessunday8 жыл бұрын
Pitty HMS Ocean is slated for scrapping with no replacement
@ULSTERISBRITISH8 жыл бұрын
nessunday Overton is it not being replaced by queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier??
@davidprice80388 жыл бұрын
nessunday Overton queen elizibeth would take on that role but the only thing she wount have is a place for the landing craft
@nessunday8 жыл бұрын
Mr Devastator true but the ocean class does a diffrent task in a fleet besides last i checked two carriers cant be in mutible places at the same time, we should be increasing the size of our fleet not reducing, as fine as a ship can be it only takes one good hit to end it
@davidprice80388 жыл бұрын
neiler 1690 no but the queen elizibeth could got and no that role even though she is not replacing here ocean queen elizibeth could still sink inti that role
@tanyard8 жыл бұрын
HMS Ocean was only built with smaller life span of 20 years, and she was commissioned in 1998 so 2018 will be her 20th. I personally think that her life should be extended by 2 years out to 2020 when both of the QE class carriers will be in commission by then, and then place HMS Ocean in to reserve for 5 years until 2025. Ideally HMS Ocean should be replaced for a like for like vessel, but politicians doing it on the cheap will put her responsibility on to the QE class carriers, massively over the top for the role of an LPH, and would make them vulnerable having to get close a hostile coast to launch helicopters and boats.
@peterchilds14115 жыл бұрын
Britain will need all the ships it can get its hands on soon.
@SuperHeroINTJ5 жыл бұрын
Why?
@dan83462 жыл бұрын
Can't beat a bit of RICE 10....until it goes down and you're on watch.
@MrAutry637 жыл бұрын
It is here in Miami fir the last 3 days
@drewrosenfeld18175 жыл бұрын
HMS Ocean. What a fitting name
@zach96206 жыл бұрын
We've worked with the Royal Navy in Westpac 84 in the Indian Ocean. USSKitty Hawk CV-63.
@garwhittaker37436 жыл бұрын
Any good ?
@zach96206 жыл бұрын
Highly professional and dependable.
@garwhittaker37436 жыл бұрын
Hope we are allies along time into the future,, all the best a Royal Navy's man's son ...England
@zach96206 жыл бұрын
Oh, yes. UK/US Navy Partnership.
@granskare5 жыл бұрын
I visited in Istanbul the HMS Eagle (the 1951 build), I saw guys in hamocks, and then in the mess, urns filled with tea and milk. :)
@573gwills35 жыл бұрын
If we kept this ship and built 2 more along side the two Queen Elizabeth class ships we would have a fleet as powerful as the one we had in the 60s just like when we had eagle and ark royal alongside Albion, bulwark and Hermes as commando carriers, we would still be a fleet to be reckoned with, they need to meet the 82,000 sailor milestone and build these bloody ships, replace the the 42s with a 1 for 1 parity in. Type 45s, a 1 for one parity with type 23s with type 26s and build the type 32s adding them to the fleet in the same numbers as the type 26s ordered, imagine a surface fleet like that along with the submarine fleet of astute class and dreadnought type subs!
@Damo26905 жыл бұрын
@Frank Kirkwood nah rebellions only increase land budgets, nobody gives a flyback about the navy if they're already on our bloody island
@MajorRoadAhead4 жыл бұрын
573 Gwills You didn't mention H.M.S. Centaur in the list of 1960's carriers. Same class as the Albion, Bulwark and the Hermes. I served for 2 years on board the Centaur.
@stanielsoncoochiesmellehsm61143 жыл бұрын
You tell em mr general OF ENGLAAANNNN
@cbennetts27468 жыл бұрын
i recognised paddy ashe from the ark royal series just before she was decommissioned!
@cbennetts27468 жыл бұрын
***** yeah anyship he's on is about to be mothballed 😂😂
@isunlloaoll8 жыл бұрын
He hope he'll get to be on HMS queen Elizabeth before he retires.
@kickboxerforever003 жыл бұрын
If we're gonna have more "Bases" then we need more "Ships" it's That simple
@stevenbevis92902 жыл бұрын
The reason she is named Ocean is she is an assault carrier . During 1956 Suez crisis we didnt such a ship . Helicopters were newish then . 2 small aircraft carriers were used for the worlds 1st assault helicopter landing they were HMS Ocean & Theseus .
@F14DSUPERTOMCAT2 жыл бұрын
You said a lot and so little at the same time. Didn’t explain anything
@WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT17 жыл бұрын
Great to see the HMS Ocean in Sunderland last weekend.
@sandratogneri99822 жыл бұрын
I did a sponcerd run well if I could call it that ...the Navel team Ran along side me on the Air field. It was drizzley rain only a mile ...I did it ...but Wow no where as fit as these lads
@sandratogneri99822 жыл бұрын
Been on afew of the Carriers XXX Proud !!
@freedom146394 жыл бұрын
This ship never got replaced. RN biggestest mistake.
@walboyfredo6025 Жыл бұрын
The last time they decommissioned a ship like that was HMS Bulwark.......one year before the Falklands. Had they held on to her the UK would have had 3 "flattops" in that War.
@zakvince74255 жыл бұрын
If Britain had 8 aircraft carriers we would be golden.
@bitTorrenter5 жыл бұрын
And the F35s to along with it. And the personnel. Not a simple task.
@justatungstenrod91735 жыл бұрын
We don't even have 8 destroyers
@cyanoticspore6764 жыл бұрын
@@justatungstenrod9173 yeah we'd probably need 8 destroyers per carrier
@MajorRoadAhead4 жыл бұрын
Zak Vince In the 1960's the Royal Navy had 7 aircraft carriers. I served for 2 years on one of them, H.M.S. Centaur.
@daniellastuart31454 жыл бұрын
We could build two more man them with commonwealth crew or NATO crew
@samuelsullivan22477 жыл бұрын
LIFE EXTENSION PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!
@bh86713 жыл бұрын
It was too old then. That’s why they sold it to Brazil. Not worth the money to keep.
@zakvince74255 жыл бұрын
Could u fly short take off jets from this carrier? I know it's not designed for it but was just wondering if it was possible.
@simonhool30735 жыл бұрын
Zak Vince No, the deck would not be able to handle the heat and pressure.
@davideverett24 жыл бұрын
I don't understand why the Royal Navy sold HMS Ocean, She's had a modernizing refit done not that long ago so she should of gone in for another so that she could house a few F35B's as well as her choppers.
@kizzaaaamate89764 жыл бұрын
There’s a reason to everything
@patkelly63494 жыл бұрын
Who the hell came up with that name for a ship
@peterbrunsden3805 жыл бұрын
should not have sold this ship.
@ohnolookwho2415 жыл бұрын
She was on the brink of breaking down, the fact Brazil were willing to buy her is amazing
@simonhool30735 жыл бұрын
peter brunsden Yes we should have before it was worthless
@brunorodrigues57184 жыл бұрын
@@ohnolookwho241 It was literally updated with the latest systems years ago, lmao. You sold it because you got the new carriers, but the HMS Ocean is im perfect condition.
@burnyt30774 жыл бұрын
It's not sold Brazil still haven't paid us
@peterbrunsden3804 жыл бұрын
@@burnyt3077 Interesting...
@doritosdomaul6 жыл бұрын
agora é do Brasil esse navio e as chama PMH ATLÂNTICO🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
@jlsamarcenaria24227 жыл бұрын
E Vero,Amém,Blz!!!,Brother,
@cosmenogueiradealmeida60626 жыл бұрын
🇬🇧😉👍🇧🇷
@opponeo78057 жыл бұрын
02:58 what accent he speaks?
@BritishFreedom7 жыл бұрын
Scottish
@burnyt30774 жыл бұрын
It's been a while now when are Brazil gonna pay us for the ship
@gustavobarajas61554 жыл бұрын
Never, never, never, why? Because the Latino Brazilians of European heritage dont believe in contracts.
@burnyt30774 жыл бұрын
@@gustavobarajas6155 they paid us now
@titus_philemon7 жыл бұрын
Brazil 🇧🇷🎉
@bulletproofkam79316 жыл бұрын
Yeah Brazil HAHAHAHA... the British have used tat ship and now the great nation of Britain doesn't want her. But Brazil yeah...lol, Brazil buys old warships! Hahahahahah
@YuriLi085 жыл бұрын
@@bulletproofkam7931 Yes, any problem ?
@jvms1905 жыл бұрын
BulletproofKam our geography political situation don’t require brand new ships with nuclear systems or something
@gilbertoescamilla29937 жыл бұрын
RN needs at least three or four more QE class carriers and their escorts...Then you can talk serious power projection.
@jb764895 жыл бұрын
Gilberto Escamilla can’t afford it, they could barely afford the two
@gazzaboo84615 жыл бұрын
And then we sold this perfectly good assault carrier to Brazil because of cost cutting! I hate weasel politicians.
@donniemontoya93005 жыл бұрын
I dont really care for Royal Navy ship naming traditions. Its neat and traditional but just weird.
@arjayhome9162 жыл бұрын
They just want to dominant in sea
@narwhallegion85835 жыл бұрын
Why do they need to raise money to get medical care for a service member?
@Damo26905 жыл бұрын
Family?
@pele2208 жыл бұрын
im not clear on how doing a lot of fitness raises money for a fellow marine
@lukea19808 жыл бұрын
I would assume they got sponsored or chucked in cash.
@pele2208 жыл бұрын
so .. again , if someone is sponsoring them Just give them the damn money whats the point of making them work out for it ?
@bash31518 жыл бұрын
Pele sch In the military you have to be strong
@bash31518 жыл бұрын
Pele sch Problem with exercising you get paid, or you just get payed and the go and bloody quit l, haha no, we exercise for it
@pele2208 жыл бұрын
what does that have to do with being sponsored ? i was in the military we had the same stupid "we will do some army fitness and you will sponsor us" bullshit why not just give the soldier the money instead of making soldiers jump through hops we are going to train all the time anyway but why make a spectacle out of it
@Firstname.lastname9197 жыл бұрын
ive been on that ship hahahaha
@dynaztycrashdiet7 жыл бұрын
I have been on her 3 times & went on the bridge.
@ScaniaVabis5806 жыл бұрын
I've stood underneath it!
@garwhittaker37436 жыл бұрын
I stood on my tablet by accident while watching this ..
@nathanielwhite87695 ай бұрын
She should never have been retired without a direct replacement in construction, and for what, Political Convenience, utterly shameful!😞
@andrewhowden58268 жыл бұрын
and this is were my tax goes.
@WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT17 жыл бұрын
Josh- Try experiencing unemployment before spouting crap from what the Sun tells you.
@burnyt30774 жыл бұрын
Stop bitching
@user-eh9jo9ep5r Жыл бұрын
Could you just achieve not legal drug traffic on water around the planet. That would be most beneficial step from WW2, to all humanity.
@davidadams1887 жыл бұрын
This is the next ship for the Tory defence cuts more waisted money.
@simonhool30737 жыл бұрын
David Adams No. Her hull life is over with as she was built to commercial standards. This makes her hull life 20 years, she has served for 22. No refit or amount of money can fix hull life, engine, and living conditions.
@simonhool30736 жыл бұрын
Joe Dickson Do you know anything about hull life structures and stress conditions on them? Clearly not. HMS Ocean was built to civilian standards. While cruise ships are built to civilian standards, the amount of strain and pressure on the hull is no where near the same as a warship. Her refit a few years ago wasn’t meant to meant to fix hull life as that’s not possible, it was to extend her lifespan by another few years. You spoken or know/related to people who serve on Ocean then? Members of my family served on Ocean and know all about her. What you have said is wrong. Research it or go back to school or even speak to an engineer or seamans officer and they will correct you.
@electrobolt99626 жыл бұрын
Gar because Brazil does not operate a blue water navy. So it does not require a top of the range navy.
@vindicator055 жыл бұрын
2:56 Oi just laaf dat 'accent :D
@Damo26905 жыл бұрын
He's Scottish, and you wrote a cockney accent....
@garwhittaker37436 жыл бұрын
Royal Navy should invest in some conventional submarines for home waters .
@simonhool30735 жыл бұрын
Gar Whittaker As Royal Navy don’t comment on the positions of submarines, it’s unusual to make that comment.
@northeastlower5 жыл бұрын
Sold to the Amazon burners!! Great!
@ignatiaus38196 жыл бұрын
The navy is the most boring branch In the military
@simonhool30735 жыл бұрын
Ignacio You mean the RAF with the least amount of time away
@bitTorrenter5 жыл бұрын
I guess it all depends on your role, no? I'd love to pilot a Hercules. At night with the cockpit lights😊
@deeremeyer17496 жыл бұрын
The Ocean is "put in charge of a US naval task force"? ROFLMAO. Yeah. The ship is "commanding" US ships. Hilarious British propaganda. The only thing the Brits do well.
@peterparker42496 жыл бұрын
Yeah she was the flagship of the taskforce ...
@garwhittaker37436 жыл бұрын
What an idiot. ..
@billofrights99055 жыл бұрын
As an American I would like to apologize for my countryman. Not all of us are morons.