Hi Tanks Nuts - We hope you enjoyed this video. Let us know your thoughts in the comments down below.
@ianmangham4570 Жыл бұрын
AWESOME 👍🇬🇧
@extragoogleaccount6061 Жыл бұрын
He is so good I'd listen to him describe organizing his sock collection
@ukgamer2817 Жыл бұрын
Love the interwar tanks they are overlooked by others far to often
@robinburt5735 Жыл бұрын
What does the box just below the main gun do? or is it just additional armour protection? Looks like it might carry extra rounds or something. EDIT: Ah i am guessing it is for ammo for the vickers that is currently not installed?
@ptonpc Жыл бұрын
I really like David and the other presenters. Thankfully you seem to have moved away from the random cuts to a side camera of the presenter. That 'editing' choice was cliched years ago, As for the vehicles and time period, yes,there was so much innovation and politics at the time. People nowadays forget the designers were not stupid. Things were done for reasons.
@markedwards158 Жыл бұрын
Good to see David back again. I love his delivery style, informative and educating.
@DaveSCameron Жыл бұрын
Nice.
@noob4648 ай бұрын
I loved David Fletcher for his quirkiness and humor, but this guy is such an AMAZING speaker (I forgot his name =( )
@Caratacus1 Жыл бұрын
Those photos of the horse towing the tank and the commanders who were about to be catapulted out of their turrets were brilliant 😁
@brittakriep2938 Жыл бұрын
I am german, Brittas boyfriend. My father , born 1938, told me, that in early past wwl the mostly underpowered but overloaded german trucks/ lorries often had a problem to cross the height between my and neighbor village. So often cows, few of poor farmers in my region owned horses, had been used to give trucks ,pulling support'.
@brittakriep2938 Жыл бұрын
Ww ll, not ww l, sorry!
@glennpettersson9002 Жыл бұрын
Like every presentation by David the vehicle is used to tell a much bigger story. Classy 😎
@panzerpusher Жыл бұрын
I'm writing an alternate history set in this period, and even with the changes, this has been excellent for the deep details that give life to the setting. I love every video like this.
@c.j.zographos3713 Жыл бұрын
It's always great when David does these chats; well researched and informative, even about lesser known (at least to some of us) vehicles.
@Farweasel Жыл бұрын
Well let me just say *it certainly wasn't 'less well known' to ME* [ I'd never heard of it *at all* until this natty video broke cover ] 🙄
@jussi8111 Жыл бұрын
that mk1 with the twin 50 looks so cool
@chrisivan_yt Жыл бұрын
could be a cool new AA in war thunder :D
@Farweasel Жыл бұрын
Quite prescient given the Jabo threat that would soon be unleashed on them in fact.
@chriskortan1530 Жыл бұрын
Probably the only really useful version of these tankettes. Unfortunately it took several years into WW2 before the militaries appreciated such a vehicle.
@carrott36 Жыл бұрын
@@chrisivan_ytAlready is, the first AA in the British tree. Could be interesting though to have variants with different armaments.
@dylanmilne6683 Жыл бұрын
Love nothing more than a bit of Willey on a Friday afternoon!
@bikenavbm1229 Жыл бұрын
thanks to all to that helped with the restoration especially Pearson for your generosity, great vid on these stepping stone vehicles. A boring personal connection I used to turn wheel bearing components for Horsman used for military vehicles but I dont know which. Thank you tank Museum for conserving history.
@MaximumResultsCopy Жыл бұрын
Excellent video...thank you! I find the "background" information explaining the context and why a vehicle was built very helpful. There were many problems with British tanks in WW2 but there were all sorts of constraints on the tank program.
@89volvowithlazers Жыл бұрын
Nice to know Pearson Engineering is a going concern experts in the field so UK does have business post brexit good job Pearson. Love this vid. The early Era concepts would make a great unit in war game on this Era only.
@chriskortan1530 Жыл бұрын
I have a new appreciation for the philosophy behind these tankettes. I had always considered them worthless beyond enforcing colonial will. A good percentage of the FT tanks had a cannon and even the Panzer 2 at least had a 20mm auto-cannon. The idea that it wasn't just economy but preparing industry and keeping them in business makes a lot of sense.
@bob_the_bomb4508 Жыл бұрын
Always thought it looked like the grandad of Scorpion
@SuperAKJR Жыл бұрын
It's looks like a bren gun carrier on steroids. Or when the short kid in school discovers the weight room. 😂
@Mr_Dopey Жыл бұрын
It's layout is very similar to the German Wiesel.
@causewaykayak Жыл бұрын
That was SO interesting ! The wealth of knowledge there. The use of simple light vehicles to train up reserve production capacity was particularly interesting. It's not all nuts and bolts !
@douglasmaccullagh7865 Жыл бұрын
I'd enjoy seeing a Tank Chat on the MK VI. Thank you for discussing industrial issues behind the light tank series. I was half-way familiar with the mechanical progression, but I learned a lot here. I especially learned about the light tanks in India. That was an eye opener. Thank you!
@newhonk Жыл бұрын
It looks so happy!
@russellnixon9981 Жыл бұрын
What a great presentation by the master. I always saw these little light tankettes as bad idea but listening to this I now see for the roles in colonial wars and policing it makes sense. I also realize I;m viewing the subject with hine sight. Thanks for this, I now have a better insight to tank development.
@darrenjosephgregory Жыл бұрын
Not a tank that particularly interests me but it is wonderful to see how this tank was taken from a bare shell and restored to running order. Amazing work from all involved.
@peterharrington8709 Жыл бұрын
Great video. Pleased to see Pearson's still doing as little bit in that new / old Vickers factory. Shame it couldn't be more of course.
@darreng745 Жыл бұрын
One of those vehicles which was worth the effort of restoration as it represents a stepping stone in the evolution of tank design during the 1930's
@_ArsNova Жыл бұрын
Another fantastically informative video. Even someone who's read books on these tanks can still learn a thing or two, love all the archival photos as well. Cheers!
@OrangesAndCookies Жыл бұрын
Haha, that TC in the first picture showing the little hand grips on the top of turret looks like he scared to death of falling out the tank.
@ptonpc Жыл бұрын
Can't say I blame him. It could be a case of his top half falling out while the bottom stays inside.
@ATomRileyA Жыл бұрын
Great video, really enjoyed listening about the history of these tanks.
@Sandwichking-hikes Жыл бұрын
Great seeing examples like this which show the progress in design over the years
@RichardGoth Жыл бұрын
Great restoration... have a bunch of books with pics of it it before restoration, glad to finally see it in one piece!
@alexhunt7810 Жыл бұрын
Something David isn't mentioning (a little unfairly) is that a lot of the Army budget is being spent on motorising the infantry and artillery, whereas neither France nor Germany were that focused on motorisation
@comentedonakeyboard Жыл бұрын
Last Time i was this early, the French still held the Maginot Line.
@ShadowDragon8685 Жыл бұрын
I've been watching the Tank Museum backlog to keep my mind entertained whilst taking long walks in the morning lately. It was very odd to hear you talk for an extended period without a Cameo of Fin the Dog. Damn fascinating stuff about that dinky tank, though!
@bcluett1697 Жыл бұрын
I love hearing how much thought went into these machines. With missles and artillery being so lethal against the bigger tanks I wouldn't be surprised if some country in the future goes back to tankettes especially if they were drones.
@chris_hisss11 ай бұрын
Truly brilliant design, and ideal. Perhaps underrated but this served the soldiers with more availability than most the other tanks out doing tank things. I don't think I would have payed it much attention had it not been for tank games
@ulrichneumann406811 ай бұрын
This Tank looks like the german coldwar tank wiesel. The designer F.Porsche may be inspired of this. The Wiesel is today in german use.
@bobthebomb159610 ай бұрын
This series is really interesting, even for non tank buff like myself. Context is so important.
@gunner678 Жыл бұрын
Love this tank. The early version of scimitar!
@Kevin-mx1vi Жыл бұрын
A school friend's dad, who was a Coldstream Guardsman at the time told us that some Vickers light tanks were in use as combat - not training - vehicles early WWII. Perhaps they were only intended as reconnaissance vehicles or for possible use against German paratroops, but the sight of what he described as "a pram frame wrapped in baking foil" did nothing to raise morale !
@stewartellinson8846 Жыл бұрын
Fascinating - comprehensive and very informative, as ever. thank you
@HarryFlashmanVC10 ай бұрын
It's awesome that this tank was restored at the same factory that built it nearly 100 years ago
@nikidanberthelsen Жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to see 'the top 5 cheap tanks'. Just to see which tanks are the best in regard to cost-compromises. Which would facilitate attrition warfare.
@ian_987 Жыл бұрын
That could actually be interesting, albeit will depend very much on the criteria. As they often say, any tank is great if its only pitted against against infantry, but as soon as other tanks or anti-tank weapons appear, you might think twice! If you go down the "best value" instead of "cheap" route probably end up with T34, Sherman, Stug, and a couple of other 'usual suspects'.
@foowashere Жыл бұрын
Good idea actually, even if the criteria is a bit difficult it's still an interesting discussion.
@ethanmckinney2033 ай бұрын
Note how similar the cupola is to the one on the FCM36. The differences are that the FCM gas two sets of vision devices, a lower set in the turret faces for the commander to use while seated and the upper set in the cupola for standing; and much, much better protection from penetration of the vision devices, first with diascopes and then with the vastly superior episcopes.
@theenigmaticgamer Жыл бұрын
The German Pz I and II looked a lot more modern and businesslike than the Lt MkIV which resembled something from a funfair vehicle. I noticed the driver’s flap looks like a prime aiming point for anti tank guns. Great video thanks.
@DaiElsan Жыл бұрын
With the knowledge we have today. It would be interesting to see what could be created using the chassis as a base point, a light tank giving maximum protection, solid engine, max speed, and good fire power.
@alamore5084 Жыл бұрын
Angled armour, face hardened. Very cool. If they can tow, shoot and resist machine gun fire a very handy thing to have. It may be that personal one-man armoured modules become a thing again.
@derekmcmanus8615 Жыл бұрын
Starship Troopers 😂
@iancarr8682 Жыл бұрын
Really interesting period of the development of the tank and armour
@larryjohnson1966 Жыл бұрын
That was a neat tank. Enjoyed the history lesson. Thank YOu.
@TrajanDS Жыл бұрын
Dude at 2:45 looks super thrilled about his job
@Crash-zm2qd Жыл бұрын
My great grandfather drove these before WW2 broke out he was in Kings Dragoon Guards when they went out to Middle East they were converted to an armoured car regiment and he drove Marmon Harringtons.
@suryia6706 Жыл бұрын
David is such a good speaker. ❤
@danq.5140 Жыл бұрын
I hope Fynn is still being a good boy. Really enjoyed those Curator at Home videos. 😊
@robinburt5735 Жыл бұрын
All of the pictures of the Carden-Loyd carriers/tankettes have peeps driving them around without wearing a helmet. This seems like the obvious vehicle to which wearing a helmet would be most advantageous. EDIT: Ah i just google searched images of them and it looks like they mostly did wear helmets using them. Ignore this i guess lol :)
@ericbergfield6451 Жыл бұрын
Really good presentation of these early tanks!
@mohammedsaysrashid3587 Жыл бұрын
So Vickers company expanded light tanks opinion around the world...thank you for sharing this wonderful video
@manuwilson4695 Жыл бұрын
Great restoration!👍
@stevenbrown8857 Жыл бұрын
Until recently living near the tyneside vickers factory (well it was 😢) .. this was fab to see
@gizhou3034 Жыл бұрын
This is episode absolutely brilliant!
Жыл бұрын
Fascinating tank and story around it. I am struck by how similar the German and British approach was.
@johnlant1730 Жыл бұрын
David is always in good form!
@frankbarnwell____ Жыл бұрын
In some pictures I could imagine an "Un digested breakfast mortar ", as a weapon.
@snipermart Жыл бұрын
Just the right size for my garage. Great video again 👍
@tysonator5433 Жыл бұрын
Great tank chat, very informative
@GaudiaCertaminisGaming Жыл бұрын
When you think of this as an enclosed tankette it starts to make sense. Although I’ve always liked this tank.
@seansawyer580 Жыл бұрын
Love light tanks
@Hybris51129 Жыл бұрын
You could take a modern skid steer chassis and practically build a modern version of this thing on that. Edit: 14:35 "Oh dear that's not gone well!"
@ptonpc Жыл бұрын
All part of the plan! :D
@volvorama2369 Жыл бұрын
Instructions for operation of the clash gearbox included: Before moving off Driver must request confirmation from Tank Commander by asking: "Should I stay or should I go?"
@wbertie2604 Жыл бұрын
Amazing that new sprockets were made in the same factory almost 90 years on.
@scottross5977 Жыл бұрын
Great video! Also… at 15:57, did I spy a beer bottle atop one of the yellow bollards in the left of the frame? 😉. Reminded me of the coke bottle seen in Ben Hur. 😎
@Ubique2927 Жыл бұрын
Britain had so many far sighted brilliant tank thinkers and all of them were ignored by almost everyone except Guderian, Rommel and Hitler.
@WozWozEre Жыл бұрын
We have many, many good ideas and technological breakthroughs, and then repeatedly totally fail to capitalise on them. In almost every aspect of military technology we were very briefly world leaders, from warships to tanks to planes, before dropping the ball and letting others get ahead.
@babaganoush6106 Жыл бұрын
@@WozWozEre politicians have spent huge amounts of money and mucked up so much, Churchill not allowing the Computer developments, Duncan Sandys saying the future of aviation was missiles in 1957, TSR2, F111 in the 60's and Cameron dumping the Nimrod/Harrier in the 2010's. Chieftain tank etc I'm sure there were many more
@drpureinsanity Жыл бұрын
@babaganoush6106 not to be that guy, but sidewinder missles were produced in the United States in 1953 and adopted in 1956. The United States was ahead in aviation.
@babaganoush6106 Жыл бұрын
@@drpureinsanity lol
@glynluff2595 Жыл бұрын
Guderian was really a radio officer so all his tanks had radios and were controllable. This was the real reason for his early success in vehicles that were inferior to the British and the French. Communication can beat muscle!!
@BHuang92 Жыл бұрын
I'm glad they fixed the suspension! The previous videos show it running tippsy!😅
@chefchaudard3580 Жыл бұрын
Coil springs with no dampener or shock absorber, no wonder they skipped like kangaroos!
@WalterReimer Жыл бұрын
Cute little fellow. One can imagine swarms of them sweeping across the countryside and disappearing into the woods.
@TheWirksworthGunroom Жыл бұрын
Fascinating how much more mobility and protection these ancient museum pieces have than JACKAL which has no more firepower and is still being ordered.....
@Ob1sdarkside Жыл бұрын
Great restoration
@captiannemo1587 Жыл бұрын
About time Martel gets some love here.
@iambiggus Жыл бұрын
Great history and story.
@firefox5926 Жыл бұрын
6:32 also notiveign alot of sloped armour long before the war
@chriswilkin2112 Жыл бұрын
Love the fact that someone chisled off the name and factory location thinking that the enemy wouldn't remember that Vickers, the major tank builder and exporter, was based in Newcastle, Oh well. 😂
@magnusnilsson2397 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much.
@Arms872 Жыл бұрын
Missed ya David!
@randyhavard6084 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for continuing to post great videos
@AllMightyKingBowser Жыл бұрын
I have never wanted to hug a tank this much, what a cute looking killing machine
@HorstMichel-mh7gv Жыл бұрын
Nice for this insight!
@WildBillCox13 Жыл бұрын
Face hardening, also called tempering, is a process of heat treating one side of a plate. For comparison, compare a standard glass pane of a house window to a tempered glass pane in the side window of an automobile. The heat treated plate is much more resistant to impacts, especially in its center.
@Colinpark Жыл бұрын
Always loved the odd look of British light tanks
@rosied6351 Жыл бұрын
DB looking good, lovely well cut and groomed beard😊
@marrs1013 Жыл бұрын
I'm not gonna lie... It is friday night, I might be a few beers in... but this material is just awesome. But of course, it is just my two drunk cents. Go me! Oh well, thumbs up, old beans or what
@timf6916 Жыл бұрын
Nice, I always Loved Tanks.
@johndudley5761 Жыл бұрын
That tank is cool 👌👍
@AsbestosMuffins Жыл бұрын
its kind of interesting in that the real goal of the early tank designers was to bring a large cannon or small artillery piece close in under cover of armor. Then after ww1 a lot of armies backtracked and went to tanks as a means to bring some heavier gun up, then ww2 kicks off and suddenly the mobile cannon concept is cemented
@ROBERTN-ut2il Жыл бұрын
25-20, The strange camouflage was unique to Malta and blended in well with its buildings.
@simongee8928 Жыл бұрын
The fact that the TC was provided with two hand grips doesn't say a lot for the handling of this one - ! 😅
@Profielzondernaam Жыл бұрын
I want to play fetch with this tank and feed it responsibly and watch it grow up into a big boy Tank! It will fit on my balcony.
@jasonz7788 Жыл бұрын
Awesome thanks 👍
@tanan6896 Жыл бұрын
We all miss you David
@DanBray1991 Жыл бұрын
Another great video! Any chance of getting a video on the Czechoslovakian CKD LT vz. 38 or LT vz. 35?
@firefox5926 Жыл бұрын
3:24 see thats some real british army thinking right there .. whereas i would have just asked if vikers could make the sides a little taler and could the put a roof on it
@mikejfranklin70006 ай бұрын
Wouldn't fancy commanding (or for that matter being inside of) one of those Mk6s. They look even taller than the Mk4, so even more likely to tumble forwards.
@Pyjamarama11 Жыл бұрын
4D chess : Vickers should have edited the makers plate to read "Made in Dresden"
@jamesellis2784 Жыл бұрын
Me rifle fits and is the gear shifter steering wheel is a army Helmut .
@peterpan9988 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting episode. But Mr.Willey's tie is a crime against humanity.
@nightshiftrider819 Жыл бұрын
The British making multiple teapot shaped tanks is unusually sus 🤔 ☕
@Akm72 Жыл бұрын
😂
@AyebeeMk2 Жыл бұрын
genetic enginering: "one lump ot two" refers to the bruising you would get before the suspention was sorted out....
@eliasblum753 Жыл бұрын
A tank for those who don't need to over-compensate for their own shortcomings.
@Daemascus Жыл бұрын
I had wondered if they face hardened tank armor like ship armor, good to know
@Paciat Жыл бұрын
Its so easy to check, but you you had to wait to hear it from a random video? Armor plates were face hardened before they riveted or welded them together. You couldnt do that with cast armor. Early war Soviet and late war German plates were often low quality and thus often over hardened, witch made them brittle. And that caused cracking and spalling.
@NetTopsey Жыл бұрын
I've wondered for a while now, do you 3D scan working parts when you do repairs/restorations? It seems to me that a 3D scan of a part could then be used to manufacture parts that break, or be used in future restorations of other vehicles. I'll admit my knowledge of this sort of thing is quite limited, but I think that it would be really useful for highly standardized things like engines or gear boxes/transmissions, in addition to helping other museums doing restorations of their vehicles.
@williammathew8260 Жыл бұрын
We used sloped frontal armour then, but seemed to abandon it after. Were the benefits not understood? Why did we do that, only to adopt it after WWII?
@matthiuskoenig3378 Жыл бұрын
There are issues with sloped armour in regards to machinegun mounts and optics, and it's bad for vehicle storage on the Hull sides. Those issues had to be solved first before sloped armour could be used more, note alot of British pre-war and ww2 tanks had sloped armour, just not for optics and mgs.
@denisrobertmay87511 ай бұрын
All the British Wartime tanks ( Matilda, Valentine, Churchill, the 'C' Crusiers...) maintained the sloped frontal hull armour, reverse sloped lower, sloped glacis a thick vertical block covering drivers vision port (and bow gun). This allowed greater enclosed volume with lower hull profile and lower weight penalty. Turrets presented a more complex problem. The lower hull meant the turret ring was between the tracks hence smaller. Three crew, large gun breech, coaxial and radio along with mantlet and trunnions dictated a vertical Faceplate as the capacity to cast a large turret in numbers did not exist.