Putin must remember 'Nato has nuclear weapons too' | Michael Clarke

[@themanilafolder2284]

Thats what I call OBVIOUS. I dont understand leaders who like to bring up their nuclear weapons as if they are the only one who has it.

[@LeilaniFord-r7q]

Putin threatens nuclear. But Russian isnt asuperpower since Gorbachav removed the Berlin wall. Putin is the most evil among us. He doesmt want to nuke himself. If he hurls nukes he will be plummeted by all those threatened

[@ChristiansAgainstGenocide]

It's only the West that keeps bringing up nuclear weapons. Putin has never once threatened the West or Ukraine with nuclear weapons. You seem to be talking about something that only happened in your own head.

[@themanilafolder2284]

@@ChristiansAgainstGenocide how about when kim jong UN brought it up w trump?

[@LeilaniFord-r7q]

@HollywoodGentile false. I've heard him recently. If he doesn't get what he wants. I dont know if the West and the east ever agreed on anything. As for Russia that is.

[@beba5865]

It is easy, leave others alone

[@solomit1]

What a crazy world we have created to even talk about nuclear weapons and destroying cities !

[@Keepler22b]

Exiting times we live in:)

[@leeleelee0054]

Only a fool would want a war

[@curiousnomadic]

Why not? We are already fubarred by global warming.

[@experimentalme7438]

happened throughout history before nuclear power was discovered... you may have read about cities destroyed and set on fire...by barbarians, legions, empires, etc... nothing changed just the magnitude.

[@b.b1455]

We? Poetin is de enige gek die loopt te roepen over kernwapens.

[@freshleaf748]

Thumbs up for that courageous statement. This is what I have been waiting for to hear.❤

[@dodgebrother6751]

@freshlèaf748 Me too

[@tankthepitbull520]

The fact we are even entertaining this rhetoric is terrifying.

[@dogpaw775]

put your fingers in your ears, go 'nah, nah can't hear you' and perhaps it will go away : NOT.

[@eddiel7635]

not really, Putin is making nuclear threats, we’re just reminding him of the consequences. He probably shouldn’t have gambled with this invasion.

[@petehowett2854]

YOU WILL HEAR THE louder LOUDER,VERSION VERY SOON.

[@malcolmmitchell6529]

History DEMANDS WAR.

[@williamkinkade2538]

Putin started it! HELLO!

[@CM-ey7nq]

"You're the problem here, not the rest of us" pretty much sums it up wrt mr Vladimir.

[@ricky_pigeon]

Yes he is, Putin caused my country to join NATO. Only brain washed orcs don't understand that.

[@NYx3]

It was Putin who started this war predicated on lies. As far as I am concerned, he is in no position to threaten escalation. I think every time he escalates the west should match it 2 folds. I would love to see my president be more forceful with Putin.

[@Lou.B]

I thought he was referring to Biden....

[@DarrenJamiesonJamieson]

His name is Gladamere, which I'm sure you'll be glad to hear!

[@Z5100-k7t]

Who is the rest of us

[@bonniemiller4041]

Fascinating and informative conversation. Thank you for reporting on this very important topic.

[@dpelpal]

I am Russian, live to Samara. What he said is a truth. Inflation will be end of us, many are to know

[@KyökkänäKyökki]

Kysykää toki, mikä on ajanut asioita tähän jamaan. Minäpä vastaan tähän itse. >>> Rauhaa ei haluta, halutaan vain laajentaa sotaa. Vain muutama hullu psykopaatti , joka määrää aseiden annot ja myöntää- antaa iskemiselle luvat jotka takaa 100% sodan laajentumisen. Nyt tästä asiasta keskustellaan, aiheena ydinaseet. Luoja mitä idiootteja. Eikö kukaan tajua ehkäistä asioita, heittää nämä hullut psykopaatit perunakellariin oikeisiin töihin.! Niin ei tarvita ydinasekeskusteluita ollenkaan.!

[@malcolmmitchell6529]

You think????????

[@dpelpal]

@@malcolmmitchell6529 Many in Russia very bad sitation inflation with

[@gdreading9088]

Yes we have nuclear weapons too . . . And ours work.

[@scotsmanofnewengland7713]

What side are you on ? NATO ?

[@tomcolley9008]

They didn't work the last time we tested them....

[@ukgrandmaster978]

​@tomcolley9008 wasn't that long ago either lol

[@adbogo]

Great, that will leave a world of radioactive waste. Something I've been waiting for all my life.🤣🤣🤣

[@simbarashekunedzimwe1372]

The HMs woeships have lights on blinkers...which doesn't cultivate confidence....speaking of woes...The Rapture is so imminent and Jesus will take His people. Are you ready? Or you prefer to wait for the antiChrist and his 666 Mark of the Beast? WIth it comes problems too hard to imagine and not worth your life. Why don't you, you the reader of this message, come to Jesus Christ for a full pardon, to be forgiven of sin. HE calls and promises all sinners a welcome and the free gift of ETERNAL LIFE.

[@antibonn]

God Bless Great Britian!!!

[@IainHC1]

A playground bully IS exactly how I would describe him!! Very well said 🙂

[@TF12191]

Don't let them mainstream lead you into thinking your own government isn't the same

[@DH-uu5ps]

@@TF12191 I'm not sure but it seems as though you are essentially saying, "Both Sides!" That is, at best, a gross mischaracterization. There is a side for good. There is one for evil. Choose.

[@stephensumner8041]

@@TF12191 bot go home. nice bot.

[@stevehorn4680]

Putin will reap no rewards.

[@RonTriebel-lt7ig]

@@TF12191the same as what?

[@harryflower1810]

Not only has UK independent Nuclear deterrent so does France

[@seanrm]

Only France has a truly independent nuclear deterrent.

[@kmetofficial5800]

The problem is not having nukes. The problem is Russia having unstoppable nukes while Russia has defensive systems that protects the from nukes. Only the US has a protection system against nukes and Russia nukes can even bypass their system

[@tombarry2523]

@@kmetofficial5800That idiot Putin has been warned by China that if nukes are used, all support by them will disappear. China relies on selling products into Europe and the US.

[@STATENS-adventures]

@@kmetofficial5800Yeah and they have like nearly 6,000 nuclear warheads

[@BrianTrudeau]

You only have to consider that there are homemade drones attacking the Kremlin, to see what an absurd comment you re making…

[@DannyLackey-o9u]

Thank you I am so glad that someone finally said what should be said

[@777mantikor]

I always listen when Prof. Clarke is on. Great analysis based on knowledge.

[@revenone1077]

Literally everything he has said about Russia and before has been proven wrong over time.

[@HaleG9]

​@@revenone1077in your world of Kremlin-proaganda maybe. But reality sticks...

[@777mantikor]

@revenone1077 Thank you. I was wondering about the magnitude of your ignorance, and you made it abundantly clear.

[@revenone1077]

@@HaleG9 He was wrong about Aghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Georgia, Donbas but now of course he is right... He literally works for CIA funded NGOs and you talk about me being naive?

[@HaleG9]

@@revenone1077 source? By the way, this statement is nothing but logic. And if Putler is as irrational as some portrait him to be, we cannot help it anyway. The only thing that surely will not stop him is appeasement - as the past has shown ample times.

[@martin-hall-northern-soul]

Interesting choice of words for the video's headline, whereby Michael Clarke in fact says that 'Britain has nuclear weapons' not just NATO.

[@TomTomicMic]

It was because Putin named the UK directly ( .....and the US but everybody knows the US has nukes), each of the five subs has a minimum of 8 missiles (Max 16) and each missile has 5 different warheads so can hit 40 different targets or up to 80, not "just" Moscow but practically all of Russia will be in range by one sub!?!

[@lawrencemusana8425]

​@@TomTomicMic RUSSIA HAS 6000 WAR HEADS COMPARED TO USA WITH AROUND 5000

[@stewartabel]

@@lawrencemusana8425 ok and the rest of NATO vs Russia == ?

[@garyrumsby3330]

Britain is not a very important country on the world stage it acts like one and feels it should run the world When it can’t look after its own aboriginal population We shut down or mines and industries Then pussyfied the population I reckon Briton will get a smack in the mouth because you can’t bargain from your past glory Take a look at where you are now And I will say one think from outside the country you do not look in a good place And I think the aboriginal people feel this way

[@MrGloambury]

@@lawrencemusana8425 So what? The first Nukes ever made more or less wiped out a city each, how many modern Nukes do you need to destroy a country? A hundred? Two Hundred? (probably much less) by that point RUSSA HAS MORE NUKES THAN AMERICA is a pointless argument at best, because America also has enough Nukes to wipe out Russia (and basically cause a nuclear winter) LONG before a thousand warhead difference becomes an issue.

[@jamesvoller167]

Americans calling anyone else a playground bully is a joke. A very sick joke.

[@ephebo2025]

both us and russia bully.

[@HardLineElektron]

Well spoken, Prof. Clarke!

[@WinstonGoldstein]

😂😂😂😂

[@CalRapz]

Lay off the spice lad

[@Woodsman24]

Yes...I haven't on times agreed with his opinions...but here, I agree ,he makes solid points and he makes them well. Well spoken ,yes.

[@mdovi1111]

USA can't save their people in Israel 😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂

[@TallSilentGuy]

@@WinstonGoldstein 😂😂😂😂 = Coping mechanism.

[@septimusseverus4398]

Dear sir, there are no winners using nuclear weapons.

[@normweaver534]

That's right but you can't let the bully run you over.

[@jamesvoller167]

@septimusseverus4398 Yes there are. The worms!

[@EarlSChristy]

Hear hear! Well spoken, thanks!

[@BlackMarketHoney]

Did Prof. Michael Clarke just coin a new phrase regarding the kremlin’s reaction as “pre empty” instead of “pre emptive”? Definitely appropriate in this case.

[@evaluateanalysis7974]

"a new phrase" No, there were several glitches in the audio.

[@Blessedishisname]

Mali don’t want the Russian colonisers either

[@Jake-co3wk]

Really enjoy the insight of Clarke.

[@RobMedvedev]

Wow 0:41 MC ! Giving it how it is !!! First time I have seen someone say that ! But it needed saying ! A lot of the uk know nothing about what kind of weapons we have or or how we would use them

[@Haegemon]

It's public knowledge, Trident missiles in the naval base of submarines at Scotland.

[@RobMedvedev]

@Haegemon lol. We know it, public knoledge, lol ! We know what trident is ! But you go and ask any person in the street what trident is ? And ask them if they know how the missile splits into several warheads and hits several targets !

[@RobMedvedev]

@Haegemon and the sub is not in the naval base of Scotland, the sub is out on patrol and is swapped over

[@RobMedvedev]

@Haegemon same , most people don't know how many bases and planes the US have in the uk ! But that is public knowledge! Must people don't know what QRA is from conningsby and Lossiemouth, but it's public knowledge

[@axelv1753]

Sullivan is not afraid of escalating, he is afraid of responding to escalation.

[@kmrtnsn]

Jake Sullivan is useless, still dreaming of sending more cash to his buddy the ayatollah.

[@nicholasmaude6906]

He's clearly a feckless self-deterring coward who's afraid of his own shadow.

[@mohamedhalicelamina2215]

WE SILL SEE IF POSEIDON ENTERS AMERICA WATER

[@nicholasmaude6906]

Yeah, Jake Sullivan is a self-deterring coward and I hope Biden grows a brain and dismisses Sullivan.

[@EveningDiscipline421]

@@mohamedhalicelamina2215 Nah.

[@upgrademix6791]

Shoutout from Philippines

[@philipbrackpool-bk1bm]

He might be nuts enough to go for a scorched earth policy, but are his generals, and the Chinese certainly won’t die for Putin.

[@tombarry2523]

China would be badly affected if nukes are used anywhere by Russia. Exports would suffer. They have warned them too.

[@lebzhau1401]

Are you Chinese😹😹😹?

[@rinkydinkfretboard8737]

More importantly, have his very expensive and difficult to maintain fissile material in his warheads been properly maintained? Would they even go off? They have more ordinance than any other power on earth. That’s a heavy maintenance bill! ………i doubt if they have more than a few viable weapons. If that.

[@JosephGibson]

Here is the thing sherlock... at that stage, its everyone. With that said, sherlock, China knows full well that if they peddled along with us on trying to bring about Russia's defeat and breaking up that it is next on the chopping board! By the way, that was some officials words from China... China is 100% on Russia's side and will not just sit by and let it fall nor would Iran. You're a in la la land and have no idea about the geopolitics.

[@grahamhireme9283]

@philipbrackpool-bk1bm It’s Vlad here. This is what will happen. Satellites providing intel will be taken out. Iran will be given the green light to use Russian technology as they or their proxies see fit and this could result in the Middle East being shut down and diesel/petrol hitting £5-10/litre with very severe rationing. Putin doesn’t want or need to use nukes but he’s very aware that once the west starts to eat itself it may very well turn to the nuclear option

[@marcelbruin9151]

"russians should think"... Yeah ... If they only took that advice, 2 years ago.

[@WinstonGoldstein]

Should they have surrendered to NATO?

[@marcelbruin9151]

@@WinstonGoldstein Russia got the biggest stock of nukes in the world. No NATO country was busy with invading Russia . There busy making money.

[@geoffhaylock6848]

10 years

[@williamproffitt6688]

​@@WinstonGoldsteinIf Russia was at war with nato everyone is dead.

[@TomTomicMic]

​@@WinstonGoldstein No comrade, they shouldn't have genocidally and illegally invaded Ukraine, they would have been better off as they are a shower at present, the Wider West is just helping Ukraine defend itself!?!

[@RonaldoCanencia]

Very correct

[@kevinfisher7032]

I think the fascinating question (which I hope we never answer) is if Putin gives the order to launch nukes how many of his generals will obey and how many will start the coup. AND if the buttons are pressed (or keys turned) how many Russias missiles still contain un-plundered fuel, chips and nuclear material...how many would actually go anywhere. If the answer to that question is not zero I suspect it's very close.

[@dalecrocker3213]

What funny ideas you have. Russia is the world leader in nuclear technology. They build nuclear power stations all over the world and their armaments are kept in very good trim.

[@peterflohr7827]

@@dalecrocker3213 What funny ideas you have. Russia has such great technology, sophisticated EW equipment worth many millions on cheap Chinese tyres getting flat, so they have to be abandoned, fully intact.

[@klausschwab9828]

If Putin gives the order, thats all that is required. The people 'turning the keys' do not actually know they are launching nuclear weapons. They 'turn the keys' every day, they have a system where they dont even know if and when they will be launching. And Im afraid to tell you, the USA, who have some of the greatest intelligence, believe completely that Russias nuclear weapons both work, and work in large enough number to destroy the USA. If they didnt think Russias nukes worked, the USA would invade Moscow tomorrow.

[@dalecrocker3213]

@@peterflohr7827 As well as great technology they have great corruption too! Mind you, this story has never been truly confirmed. Doesn't alter the fact that they've got a few thousand nuclear missiles ready to go.

[@dalecrocker3213]

@@peterflohr7827 I know, it's dreadful. You just can't get the staff nowadays.

[@robertmclark646]

Scary but realistic

[@Hisu25]

Right 💯

[@melvingrimes7886]

Let's not forget the only country to ever use nuclear weapons in war is the United States.

[@f.r.ashley1317]

… so far! 😊

[@melvingrimes7886]

@@f.r.ashley1317 And it needs to stay that way.

[@Gabriel-rieRivera]

And it ended the aggression of Japan before.

[@Doc-n7u]

Did you have a point or just rambling?

[@RichardIves-z5t]

It ended WWll.

[@Karl44444]

Moscow Russia would be obviated 22 minutes after he presses the button for nuclear

[@Mens_Rights]

Then Paris, Rome, Berlin, London, Madrid, Athens, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia, ...

[@chubbygallasso]

⁠@@Mens_Rights15 mins after Europe obliterated.

[@davyjones5509]

Не пытайтесь объяснить тупому школьнику, что победителя не будет при обмене ядерными ударами

[@hewagoda]

​@@davyjones5509well said

[@EveningDiscipline421]

@@Mens_Rights Don’t mention Houston. Leave Texas out of your fantasies.

[@breizher8292]

The informed and correct assertion of the situation and what's needs to be done.

[@wycliffew.woduor1748]

The cheetah must remember that a goat has speed too!

[@noelplum99]

If Russia is a cheetah it is a cheetah that hasn't exercised for decades because its trainer sold all its fitness equipment on ebay for personal gain!

[@NigelBrobbey]

​@@noelplum99it doesn't take a lot of training to release all of a country's nuclear arsenal .stop saying things to feel comfortable and face reality

[@davidhall7648]

Russia has hypersonic nukes

[@BeggarZelenskyy]

Comparing Cheetah with a goat? Man what exactly are you smoking 😂

[@labrador3231]

Another great assessment from professor Clarke. It’s always good to hear a rational point of view.

[@ganidunipun3226]

The reason they bringing up nuclear weapons is because they have bunkers and we don't

[@profeta1982]

We love prof Clarke

[@haystackhider7158]

I wonder what the doomsday clock is showing right now LOL

[@davyjones5509]

Ничего не показывает. У современных лидеров слишком маленькие яйца чтобы применить ядерное оружие

[@adamshatwell]

About 10 past according to the media

[@haystackhider7158]

@@adamshatwell LOL

[@malcolmmitchell6529]

Lol?? Fool

[@jeyiflosfarms]

TikBoom

[@sciencelad8286]

Russia is a very large country with only two cities that matter. Something for the Kremlin gremlin to think about.

[@dxd8663]

So what, Britain is a very small country with only one city that matters.

[@erblinbeqiri9790]

​@@dxd8663That's not true. Look up all the cities the UK has and their population.

[@hughmungus_698]

Doesn’t matter a damn with the dead hand system.

[@DuyDi-rj5rk]

These two cities would be 500m under the ground in less than 1 hour

[@Mens_Rights]

@sciencelad8286 Russia has 12 cities with over a million people in them. From where do you get this figure of "two"?

[@jayjay-ge4pd]

It is always interesting to hear his views

[@DavidNelsonATX]

I’m pretty sure the US has them too, and there’s Article 5, so the UK is not alone.

[@bacon_208]

@@dmode1535how much do you want to bet that more than half of those don’t work

[@wlyFwd2140]

russia will be the next north korea with a DMZ (very long border)

[@wlyFwd2140]

will they shoot if you run to the west?

[@ricky_pigeon]

@@wlyFwd2140 they already shoot their own soldiers if they stop moving forward.

[@oneshothunter9877]

@@wlyFwd2140 Or to the South? Or east? North? Russia too big to really being able to protect borders in a "situation"..

[@erosgritti5171]

Russia cannot be like North Korea. North Korea may be this way because it is supported by China and Russia and because it is relatively small and borders 2 of its allies. So whatever happens, it won't be a second North Korea. Probably something more dangerous. This is why Americans don't want Russia to lose. They want Russia to win as little as possible at the highest cost, in order to be more controllable

[@Johnwayne1968]

Let's hope not ! Biden needs to overcome fear😢

[@swankieR_wheels]

WOW! thank you

[@GiottoMoon]

55 minutes! ... 55 Minutes from the order to Launch? What the Heck!

[@karlmagnuswithbro9055]

55mins from order to hit. Not launch.

[@GiottoMoon]

@@karlmagnuswithbro9055 He Said "That submarine would fire it's missiles 55 minutes after he gives the order" ;S

[@petewright4640]

​@@karlmagnuswithbro9055Clarke definitely said the missiles would be fired 55 minutes from receiving the order. Maybe Clarke misspoke. It makes sense though as a delay would allow for a correction to a mistaken order. It's not like these missiles are targeting other Russian nuclear assets which need to be hit quickly. Moscow isn't going to go anywhere! The missiles are unstoppable and Putin knows that.

[@petewright4640]

To give time for a correction. Probably a good idea given the situation.

[@ltmub]

from a balanced point of view I imagine the Russians have the same type of ammo ready. Only a fool would think otherwise.

[@surgio154]

Ukraine is about to fire their own long range missiles and long range torpedoes

[@marketads1]

Ukraine’s long range missiles aren’t theirs, they were supplied and trained with the caveat that they not be used without permission. The permission is on the doorstep.

[@markmewordz6860]

Thesecare NATO manned, NATO owned and NATO supplied. This is an insane escalarion of the war started by NATO /CIA in 2014. We're truly f**ked here in Europe now.

[@kevinmulligan9055]

​@marketads1 no ukraine has made its own long range missle.

[@Bobby-fj8mk]

And they are useless without live satellite data. Many of the targets are mobile.

[@mratchford42992]

@@marketads1they are testing their own long range missile. It’s probably ready by now

[@davidobrian]

fantastic insight as always from prof clarke

[@yomajo]

I like what and how he talks. First time I hear this man, but he knows ruzzia well. Respect from Lithuania.

[@michaelweston1042]

When russia broke the Budapest Agreement in 2014 we should have given Ukraine it's weapons back. Even now we still can.

[@davereynolds3403]

and when ukraine, france and germany broke the minsk agreements ?

[@marcl3763]

when NATO promised not to use long range missiles...

[@michaelweston1042]

@@marcl3763 NATO isn't using anything. Ukraine is getting weapons from others just like russia. Who by the way doesn't restrict what they hit at all.

[@Ed19601]

@@michaelweston1042 russia didnt break anything in 2014. Sure you can 'now' give ukraine nuclear weapons and the moment you do that you will have a nuclear WW3. Be happy, very happy ukraine does not have nuclear weapons. They are Nazi's

[@FabiusPolis]

What? A little bit confused? The Budapest memorandum was after the breakdown of the Soviet Union. Russia has withdraw its nuclear rockets for the sake of deescalation from Ukraine, same happened with the US nukes in Germany. At this point in time, Ukraine was afraid of an attack from the WEST and wanted guarantees as they felt defensless without the nukes. And therefore the Budapest agreement was made that russia comes to help if Ukraine gets attacked. So what weapons do you want to "give back"? The russian nukes? In the case nobody ever thought of, the Russia and Ukraine are at war, how do you want to apply this memorandum? Russia comes to help against Russia? And because of not doing so YOU want to give "back" the russian nukes to Ukraine? A bit weird stuff.

[@willgraham3974]

Michael Clarke is the best

[@Digmen1]

I wonder if Britiain and France have made any more Stormshadows and Scalps? How long does it take to make one? You have to order all the parts

[@El-Jefe]

RusBots like to forget our submarines that have Nuclear Trident II D5 ballistic missiles with three-stage, solid-propellant, inertial-guidance & that the missiles can carry multiple independently targeted re-entry bodies. It would be a shame if they were creeping around in the Baltic sea waiting to deliver a dose of find out 😂Sweet dreams Ivan's 💅🏻

[@dannylojkovic5205]

And China ain’t backing up Russia

[@boota1979]

@El-Jefe Don't be so ridiculous, are you talking United States Navy or the Royal Navy? Once that starts the world will be in an all out war, do you want that?

[@adz951]

I just pray to God that we never have to use those weapons

[@alandl7749]

Nuclear subs with Tridents? What does that matter when London and other cities are no more?

[@El-Jefe]

@@alandl7749 morning Ivan 💅🏻 still hiding under your bed from drones in your invaded country? 😂

[@NickD24]

I could listen to this man for hours

[@savakiranbaan8546]

More from Michael Clarke❤🌷.

[@jake751]

No thanks

[@multipl3]

Putler loves his life of luxury and unchallenged power too much to throw it all away now

[@joachimfrank4134]

He should have thought about this before throwing it away in 2022. His best bet for retireing alive is visiting La Hague. The Netherlands don't have the death penality.

[@michaelgill5644]

Old Putin face was behind our Brexit vote. I'm quite sure.

[@jaimepatena7372]

You are assuming Putin is sane.

[@suzyqualcast6269]

He dished his wife as she stumbled, just alive, from that RTA.

[@Klartraumprofi]

You don’t know how Russians are. At a certain point it’s all or nothing

[@modestmouse2889]

MADNESS

[@tages_matuna]

"A submarine, in the North Atlantic, always ready". Coming from Prof. Michael Clarke it is a chillier reminder than the clowns 🤡 in ruSSian state TV.

[@gianfrancoguiso8663]

Mad

[@TomTomicMic]

​@@gianfrancoguiso8663 Mad is not being able to counter the threat from Putin and giving in and being under his rule, we will not and the cost will be higher for Russia, they should just get out of Ukraine or it will get worse they are the war criminals!?!

[@anthonyhulse1248]

@@gianfrancoguiso8663the only sane response.

[@davereynolds3403]

and russia doesn’t have submarines that are always ready ? what’s with the arrogance of the West ? going to get us all blown up …

[@tages_matuna]

@@davereynolds3403 Before anything, arrogant is the mafia boss in kremlin, who foolishly invaded Ukraine

[@mikethomas3069]

I love his intel and hes honest! Very in-depth smart man

[@garylake1497]

He’s a propaganda mouthpiece for the CIA/MI6 nato scam that got us into this mess in the first place

[@Jomac-c7r]

4.42 really good advice intelligent man

[@edwardsianski725]

kaputin forgets that NATO has weapons! Thanks for a great interview with Michael.

[@numb48.]

NATO has weapons but used Ukrainian as cannon fodder why you and so called NATO on the frontline like what they did on IRAQ, LIBYA and other weak country why

[@leisamaggard113]

STOP IT! YOUR RUDE!@@numb48.

[@slavonskibecar]

Yes NATO has but are western people ready to deal with them. Sure Russians will get hit too but russians are used to suffering but westerners are not. Western nations didnt suffer even in WWIII but Russians did so if it comes to the worse west would pay much higher price. Russians had communism 1 world war WWII and suffered a lot so they are used to it Are you ready to suffer because nukes are not something you play with

[@hearambasharma]

Knowledge without Wisdom: M Clarke

[@michaelkavanagh5947]

What happens when Ukraine builds their own nuke?

[@justayoutuber1906]

They used to have them. They gave them back to Putin in return for protection

[@AnotherPointOfView944]

Short answer: Its not easy.

[@marcelopmor3711]

Beautiful statements. Congrats!

[@normweaver534]

This is the most common sense viewpoint I have heard on this subject. Agree completely. When Putin rattled the Russian nuclear sabre during the early months of the war, we should have done the same. Yeah Vlad, we got nukes too. Want to play chicken?

[@slooob23]

Are you insane?

[@Dungshoveleux]

He is winnimg from where I am standing. Start with facts, not propaganda.

[@davereynolds3403]

russia is winning big time, but in the post truth era of internet commentators, facts don’t matter … sadly 😢

[@STHFGDBY]

Where are you standing, on the moon ..

[@CM-ey7nq]

Sacrificing a whole bunch of conscripts in his egomaniacal vision.

[@csh5414]

What exactly is he winning? We’ll wait. Come on bot earn your 1 kopeck per comment.

[@Dungshoveleux]

@@STHFGDBY No in Hobbiton and sometimes in Barad Dur.

[@ItWasReallyNothing1408]

Mr Clarke - please listen to what Putin has actually said. He just stated that these missiles will mean that UK will be in direct war with Russia. He did not mention using nuclear weapons at all.

[@Keepler22b]

Good!

[@magdalenaneri2004]

Exactly. Talking about a nuclear threat is manipulation with propaganda intent. In fact, Russia has non-nuclear deterrent weapons. Hypersonic, supersonic and subsonic, long- and medium-range ballistic and cruise missiles. The Russian response will not necessarily be nuclear, in principle.

[@nerifterafrnam4682]

Oh Putler says a lot of things, it´s not a war but military operation, they never invaded Ukraine but were invited, gesture of good will etc etc. Soon he´ll be talking about manbearpig.

[@tiradoentertainmentllc.2517]

Putin has been stating it explicitly FOR MONTHS and MONTHS until China told him forget about it but he still drags the threat out

[@seannolan8615]

Putin doesn't want to use them, but he knows he has to, because nato will be forever closing in on Russia.

[@Dododaler]

ok, let us press the button!!

[@jhaduvala]

Times Radio - the channel for the deluded.

[@malcolmmitchell6529]

And ancient warmongers.

[@jonlee2217]

@@malcolmmitchell6529 Putin is the warmonger. He started this war.

[@johnpaulwebb3440]

Putin must also understand not all Americans have bone spurs.

[@Retarmyaviator]

No, some like Biden used the excuse of asthma to dodge the draft while at the same time being a life guard and playing football.

[@TomTomicMic]

The US is trying to avoid escalation but it's all Putin's got, either he runs out of money or equipment or troops or Oligarchs maybe all at the same time!?!

[@jimjones9239]

Many are fairies who lean left and they hate their whiteness.

[@Zygfryd1909]

Putin is NOT threatening anyone, in the original he is saying that Russia will defend itself from Western weapons that will be coordinated and launched by Western military from Ukraine, since Ukraine cannot do it itself

[@Crimeajewel-me3me]

❤❤❤❤ 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 ❤❤❤❤❤

[@DS-zr8pw]

Why so many announcements. Putin doesn't tell anyone in advance when he orders strikes. Just allow Ukraine without all the bla bla.

[@jamesaustin5486]

I've listened to Michael quite a few times and he's got a very extensive knowledge of Ukraine and Russia He's the one that talks the most sense

[@andrewwale7002]

All his predictions about Russian and Putin were inaccurate lol

[@jamesaustin5486]

In your opinion lol

[@traxx2001]

don't forget that Nato is not a country but Russia is.

[@normweaver534]

What does that mean for this discussion?

[@Temuginful]

Out of order! Article 5 states that…”the attacked on one state is considered an attack on all…”and that trigger a counter attack!

[@RobMedvedev]

4:35 What a weak comment made by the lady. Can you imagine the UK backing down to putin ! How weak would we look. Plus, I know they have no chance of taking nato on

[@Stevekpb]

Yeah its idiotic.

[@Foxy57237]

@@RobMedvedev So it's okay for Starmer to bow down to radicalised Islamists how is that any different to bowing down to Putin ?

[@saikrishna8211]

If NATO enters Russia, it is not Russia that the US will be worried about. The response to it will come from Iran amping up against Israel, China amping against Japan and Taiwan, and NKorea amping up against SKorea. It is the North Pacific, Indian Ocean, and the Middle East that they're worried about.

[@uptownuptownmedicalcentre8455]

At this stage arrogance does no good to anyone,you feel your weapons will work and Russians will not,weapons are not luxury cars,after all we’ve seen how reliable Range rovers are.

[@MichelSimracer]

Every time I hear these sort of things about nuclear bombs etc. I instantly think about "Two Tribes" (Franky Goes To Hollywood) the only war I could watch.

[@ThePixey1000]

That is a very play ground quote " We got nukes too " the fact is who presses the button first and can the world live with the fall out. If only we had people in change with more than two brain cells.

[@LakeHowellDigitalVideo]

It's not about being first. Russia's nuclear arsenal are known to be poorly maintained and probably only about 20% can actually fly and accurately hit their target. Not just that, but the USA has intercept missiles that no one else has. While the defense system only has a 50% success rate shooting down inbound ICBM's -- combined with Russia's poorly maintained stock.... The USA has a massive advantage over a Russian attack and Putin knows it.

[@FilaMan74]

There is only one question: "Which nation is more ready to return to the Stone Age and which nation loses more by returning to the same?"

[@Ernest-q9g]

There are only two questions, "What can be done about Vladimir Putin ? If nothing, will Putin continually do what he wants and when confronted, will he continually raise the threat of using his nuclear arsenal ?". Discuss.

[@Dreadwolf3155]

sigh, that's not how it works. Probably be more like returning to the 1700s, which don't get me wrong i' am NOT in favor of doing

[@voice.of.reason]

With the net zero agenda of the West, they are the ones who are happy to return to the stone age. meanwhile Russia will prosper

[@karelcuchal5852]

Where's any security that corruptide Ucr.would use these rockets against military targets ONLY? Balistic misiles bases/radars excluded? I presume no security at all.

[@BETHUELGUBESA]

Russia is not alone either.

[@jesseveentjer2075]

Professor clarke is grand, one of the few good things to come out of the Ukraine war is discovering Michael Clarke

[@StanfordJohnsey]

So Putin loses Moscow and you lose London.

[@EmmanuelMadyira-q1h]

Something like that can happen 😮

[@mbaharmstrong7181]

😂😂

[@DrzBa]

It would be a lot worse than that. NATO has a no first use policy (so does Russia, but it always breaks its agreements), but once use has been made, all bets are off. Even conservative estimates have Russia losing 70% of its population within the first 12 hours of a full on nuclear exchange, whereas NATO countries lose 30% (best case) to 60% (worst case) Of course, 3 months later 90% of all humans and animal life is dead.

[@paulconway1176]

Russia has a retaliation only doctoring but this is open to interpretation. The UK has a responce based on NATO rattified by our PM, so if Russia attacked it's NATO they are attacking then it wouldn't just be the resonse from the UK the Russians would be worried about. They would lose every major city and most of the southern parts of Russia. Russia has a greater number of Nuclear warheads but the west have way more which are launch ready for a 1st strike which many would be targeted towards the storage of missiles in Russia. So they wont get much more off the ground after their initial strike. If these stikes are ground exploded, the surface would contaminate the atomoshere with radio active dust blocking our sunlight possibly for 100 years plus. So even those who survived the nuclear blasts would be considered the unlucky ones. Hense the term *MAD - Mutual Assured of Destruction! This is the reason the words have more power then the action as the action is only useable when there is nothing left to lose.

[@Mylogcabin]

​​@@DrzBa Correction. Russia recently changed its doctrine. Wouldn't be losing London. Uk would no longer be on the map. This guy is lying through his teeth.

[@metkel100]

At his age, he should have preached for peace instead of trying to undermine Russia's massive nuclear arsenal. As an old man, he should be concerned about the innocent people dying on both sides, Rather than encouraging the escalation of the conflict.😢

[@BladeRunner2025_]

The BEST and most mature comment.

[@danw918]

I think his expertise, outranks his age.

[@GeorgiJorov-pf5ge]

Hello RuZZian 🤡

[@Dreadwolf3155]

um i think he is pointing out why the conflict is not likely to go nuclear. just think how terrifying it'd be if only Russia had nukes

[@NAFO_Badger_Brigade]

He's a military analyst not a peace activist! Anyway Russia would just break the peace treaties! Russia can not be trusted!

[@davidgray4365]

Our weapons are also maintained properly whereas whether theirs will function is up for debate. Also the sub has up to a dozen nuclear missiles on board with multiple warheads in each one.

[@sarashimali8219]

Informed and shrewd analysis as always from Michael Clark.

[@ollyzaki7499]

Y'all act like only Russia has the monopoly of madness.

[@voice.of.reason]

You act like Putin cares

[@zenkaienergy3135]

@@voice.of.reason You act like you know something of relevance

[@hooareya6261]

"You can argue about whether that is a good or a bad thing !"

[@DavidEvansTeush-mc9co]

Rediculous. Sitting on a branch sawing the branch. Putin can evaporate Britain with non nuclear weapon Hypersonic missile could remove houses of Parliament. Why are nato getting in Russia face. He just doesn't want nato crowding his border. If Starmer the man with finger on the button heaven help us all.

[@GeorgiJorov-pf5ge]

Putler can't do a thing. Half of Russian missiles don't even work

[@noelplum99]

Yep. last thing he would want would be Sweden and Finland joining the NATO party 🤣🤣 Putin could evaporate Britain. He won't. What he will do is send more young Russian men to die, encourage more intelligent and wealthy young Russian men to leave the country, bury his economy into a depression that will last decades (once the false "war economy" disappears) and continue to decimate his military as the West benefits from the most cost effective military spending opportunity for decades.

[@curiousnomadic]

Lol the hypersonic missile is so low tech that it has to be launched from a supersonic jet. For the jet to even get close enough is not possible. Notice Putin can't fire "hypersonic" missiles at Ukraine anymore. Why? Because her hasn't gotten any hhahaha he's almost out of weapons! Russia is almost no more!.

[@wadesaleeby2172]

Russia is the largest country in the world 🌍 and the Putin Regime wants more. 🤔

[@dg9015]

Starmer couldnt order a mcdonalds

[@JohnDickson-k5t]

Brilliant 😂

[@keith890]

😂😂😂

[@abc123gpl]

if russia is according to americans politicians "a Gas station that act like a country" consider this: if YOU are the one that has MORE to loose, YOU are the one that should worry the most isn,t it ? cheers from germany.

[@angusabbott5615]

Why don’t we threaten to change our “nuclear doctrine” every five minutes here in the UK ? Is it because we are NOT losing a war in Europe and have realised that we are running out of Soviet era equipment 🇺🇦🇬🇧🇺🇸

[@davereynolds3403]

maybe you’re losing a war … how’s the economy? health services? riots over fake religious differences? grooming gangs ? maybe there’s a branch in your eye ?

[@JFvHussen]

Societ era equipment doesnt work anyway, I doubt that there nuclair weapons even work.

[@leet3207]

The trident missile system can be used if America gives us permission.

[@petersinclair3997]

New weapons maintenance is expensive. NATO can afford to maintain its nuclear weapons. Russia? We don’t know.

[@oneshothunter9877]

US maintenance of their around 5500 nukes is almost the same as overall Russian military spending. Doesn't really seem to give much room for maintenance of their 6000 nukes. But. Idk.

[@rogerphelps9939]

All available evidence is that Russia cannot afford to maintain anything much.

[@foilhat1138]

@@oneshothunter9877 One thing we learned from START was many Russian ICBM's were sitting in silo's full of water. There is also the tritium problem which even the US has problems with, a country as corrupt as Russia won't even bother.

[@petersinclair3997]

@@oneshothunter9877 Reagan’s US basically outspent the USSR on defence and the segment economies more generally. Before the Russo Ukraine War, Russia was rated as a CCC economy by international agencies. Today, those agencies have given-up providing ratings for Russia. If Russia hasn’t maintained its nuclear weapons properly, this bluff must be one of the cons in history. On the other hand, Russia having only one hundred workable and deliverable devices would be significant.

[@davyjones5509]

Русские пропили свое ядерное оружие ещё при Ельцине

[@TaZ101SAGA]

Hardly matters as we'd all be annihilated either way.

[@SaharaPowerLove]

Nobody is afraid of Putin.

[@cashcash5995]

American is afraid of him , cowardly hiding behind the Ukrainians .

[@Juba902]

I don't think Putin is afraid of anyone to be fair and has earned more credibility than the muppets in the West, just look at the western leaders and tell me how proud you are lol.

[@panzergrenadier2946]

Except Midgets & little boys!

[@zenkaienergy3135]

It's only his nukes

So Putin now knows he hss 55 minutes to get out of Moscow.... brilliant.

[@AnotherPointOfView944]

He knew that many years ago.

[@davyjones5509]

У западных обывателей времени будет ещё меньше, можете мне поверить

[@nottmfunguy]

Let’s get on with it. Sort it now!

[@chris-vn6sw]

Flip Flop Starmer doesn’t fill me with confidence 🍋

[@jamesvoller167]

@@chris-vn6sw Starmtrooper

[@armindapereira4433]

As soon as they use nuclear, we got to go all the way…

[@MrRONALFA]

Thank you for that comment 👍 👏

[@graham2342]

How is it Ok to supply Ukraine, But not Russia.

[@Ernest-q9g]

It all depends on which side initiates a problem and whether in international law, that problem is seen as being illegal or not.

[@tony-g1g4o]

because Russia assaulted Ukraine and are trying to get the USSR back.We are a NATO allie and part of what NATO was set up is to defeat communism

[@paulsturgess3651]

Basically very few support nazis. Russian nazis are the world's problem. The world will sort it out.

[@scratchyrice]

Because Russia started it.

[@joecater894]

war started with russian action on ukraine land, but not ukraine action on russian land.

[@spiritbaby5151]

Part of me hopes not. I watched an interview, Putin admitted the only thing that scared him was the English. Why can’t we just stay out of things? 😡

[@rodgerhempfing2921]

Because Putin is attacking a democracy for it's mineral wealth. Piracy is over.

[@Smiley-zm1rp]

Becasue it will come back and bite us. Then you would be saying save me save me.

[@barringtonsmith9147]

The world has gone stark raving mad

[@bgandjsco1]

Look at the map . Russia is not losing.

[@dlivex9492]

You're looking at one thing a map, it's more than a map, and yes, russia is losing putin and is panicking. Do research

[@alskink6931]

Whatever you say Ivan. Or is it Igor?

[@alangoddard8252]

Look at the Ruble. Russia is weakening.

[@jasonwestwood7092]

@@bgandjsco1 They only believe the fake media.

[@jasonwestwood7092]

@@dlivex9492 Russia won't lose your dreaming.

[@slooob23]

The British have lost their effing minds.

[@ashleybishton742]

We just have big cahonis lol. We probably aren't right in the head too.

[@andrewmurray4308]

Putin is far from sane picking a fight with Cossacks.

[@SamSung-ww3rp]

Who pays to volunteer to do anything. That should be your first red flag. You don't see any other submersibles being dragged across the ocean behind the ship. It is secured on the deck of the ship. Can you imagine the stress on the unit after that tow. The first that should have been is a full scan and diagnostic