When you think about it deeply, Liu Bei, the founder of the Shu Kingdom, was the one who ended it
@ComradeConfucius3 жыл бұрын
Hats off to history's greatest dad 🙏
@rlouie054 жыл бұрын
There was an urban legend that Zhao Yun was a hemophiliac where he was never wounded in battle out of fear he’d bleed out & that he actually died when his wife poked him with a needle. Rescuing Liu Shan didn’t disprove this urban legend for some strange reason, as he looks like he nearly died from the ordeal with multiple wounds.
@maximusd2611 ай бұрын
I guess it's always up to interpretation, in the 2010 series, it looks quite clear it's just ennemy blood on him, which makes his feat even more crazy
@mi6secrectservice Жыл бұрын
Lui shan is not dumb at first. It is because of Lui Bei. He threw his baby resulting in head internal damage.
@sonicthehedge Жыл бұрын
Isn't he just a baby? Not sure it can measured if he was smart before.
@baiqi44 Жыл бұрын
@@sonicthehedge In the novel, Liu Bei actually threw baby Liu Shan to the ground with no one catching him. When Liu Shan grew up, he was an idiot (ok, not really an idiot, but very incompetent).
@Killerbee47124 ай бұрын
@@baiqi44 I disagree that Liu Shan was incompetent. The circumstances of the superior enemy of Wei beat down on a kingdom that still managed to hold out for 40+ years.
@baiqi444 ай бұрын
@@Killerbee4712 I don't know if you're talking about reality or the novel cause I'm only talking about the novel. In the novel, he had great supporters during his reign as emperor/king of Shu. After even Jian Wei died, he had no one left. The enemies were strong, but Liu Shan was nothing special without his supporters (like Zhuge Liang, Zhao Yun, Jiang Wei and so on).
@Killerbee47124 ай бұрын
@@baiqi44 I'm talking about reality. The novel heavily downplays Liu Shan in order to prop up figures like Zhuge Liang, Jiang Wei etc.
@thekyoshi14845 жыл бұрын
damn he loved that general
@obitoxshinobi8978 Жыл бұрын
you cannot replace a good general but baby you can😂that's why LuiBei threw LuiShan n we know what happen to shu
@3ChZer03 жыл бұрын
note to self do not let Lui Bei hold a baby.
@leonwinkler200111 ай бұрын
Liu Bei is just… sad after Lady Mi committed Suicide. That's why Liu Bei throwed the Baby Liu Shan away.
@PuchimonExtreme8 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, Liu Bei doesn't care about Lady Mi since supposedly "Brothers are akin to limbs, wives are akin to clothing. Torn clothing can be mended, but can severed limbs be reattached?" Also if you ask me, the whole sworn brotherhood thing is starting to feel like that era's version of gay marriage considering how much they seemingly DON'T care about their wives.
@leonwinkler20018 ай бұрын
@@PuchimonExtreme Ow… That sounds really nuts.
@ShikiHisashi8 ай бұрын
No wonder Liu Shan surrendered
@anarchospooks53775 жыл бұрын
I think the 2010 series is funnier
@vincentlysrandomstuffs89245 жыл бұрын
Who did cared baby Liu Shan?
@EdwardYangsta5 жыл бұрын
Vincent Ly Zhao Yun
@vincentlysrandomstuffs89245 жыл бұрын
What happen to Lady Mi?
@EdwardYangsta5 жыл бұрын
She refuse to mount Zhao Yun horse and put herself in the well
@Cybermat475 жыл бұрын
Vincent Ly in the book she killed herself, in real life she was rescued by Zhao Yun.
@taikoamin85554 ай бұрын
At least Zilong catch the baby after he was thrown
@tatagmutaqin9 ай бұрын
Dumbledore klop ise
@vincently19954 жыл бұрын
1. Who carried Adou? 2. What happen to Lady Mi?
@bosbanon3452 Жыл бұрын
Zhao Yun
@bosbanon3452 Жыл бұрын
Lady mi commited suicide
@SAGHE8 ай бұрын
@bosbanon3452 I think Liu Bei married the tomboy princess of the eastern kingdom, she is also a known character, they used her marriega as a way to make a bond between those kingdoms, but in reality it was only a trap buy Zhuge liang or some other officer could see it and somehow made it happen with no bad consecuences, and as far as I know she grew Liu Bei's son until they separed, I heard that she tried to bring the boy to her kingdom, but got intervened by one of Liu Bei officers, because they were planning to use him as a hostage, after that she disapears.