Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM)

[@chetankandpal6674]

Amazing advertising, I am convinced .Going to order 2 FA-18 and 10 LRASM

[@gigachad8425]

underrated

[@SahilKhan-ws5hb]

A varyyy good choice indeed

[@tinto278]

lol F/A-18 is Boeing LOL if you worked in the defense industry you would know how funny that sounds LOLOOLOL order hornets from Lockheed LOOLOLOLOL

[@debmalyaghosh3474]

🤣🤣🤣 Me too...for Diwali

[@Abhinav-gu2ui]

@@debmalyaghosh3474 🤣

[@Jake-rs9nq]

I like how Lockheed creates a CGI enemy combatant ship that just happens to look exactly like a Russian ship.

[@kguy6635]

Slava Ukraini!

[@strategiccommander4736]

​@@kguy6635 Heroyam salo

[@fluffyx1556]

atleast its historically accurate

[@derprofi-ky4zn]

yeah I think it’s a Russian Varyag Class Destroyer

[@derprofi-ky4zn]

* Cruiser

[@R9A9V2]

Heres a cool name: Orbital Range Global Anti Ship Missile (ORGASM)

[@GloomyFlash]

Good one

[@howard5030]

C TheeZee we'll be waiting for that to happen

[@Kjearbyee]

ahahha nice!

[@jaemelcollado6394]

C TheeZee bright kid

[@pdfrchieve]

Hhahaha good one m8

[@thuhan3100]

One of the ship in the video is no longer a surface vessel. It's now a special operation sub.

[@5tarSailor]

Russia has 2 more slavas. But we can turn that to 0 soon if we just go to war

[@phillipmavrogenis2041]

Hahahaha good one.

[@nightraven836]

Yamato class Coral Reef :D

[@edvin_hook]

Life hack why buy one when one can be both

[@alexkor380]

Rocket - from usa... Missile guidance - from the usa... Operation management - from usa... Result - the United States sank a Russian ship that did not threaten the United States. And now in Ohio, people are being poisoned after a train crash and a chemical spill. In another state, a hydrochloric acid tank overturned - also poisoning people. Retribution?

[@stanleycahyono1013]

Another Cool Name: High Altitude Next-Gen Defense Joint Operation Bomb (HANDJOB)

[@squishy2229]

Y E S .

[@thecommentator3732]

Noise

[@victornavea6197]

Underrated coment

[@bobkin611]

Worst H.A.N.D.J.O.B. the enemy has ever had

[@richardmillhousenixon]

Only thing that makes this kinda not work is the fact that NORAD is an acronym in itself

[@nicos1097]

The missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn’t

[@princevegeta6236]

It is able to where it isn't by deviation and variation.

[@mobiusone_8483]

Bullshits 😂😂🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@ryanchuabowen2045]

@@Mono-tc3mq A documentary explaining vectors badly

[@christianitis]

Nicos Eftychiou it knows this because it knows where it has been, or where it was

[@topmovieclips7032]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/hqiyn5-jfMmSfsk

[@FungalumisBush]

This battle is literally them shooting 3 missiles at the enemy. But the music and animations make it seem so much more epic.

[@globallyfamouse6609]

firing 3 misiles at an enemy war ship is pretty cool

[@secondlayer7898]

that's what modern naval battles are

[@koekiejam18]

@@secondlayer7898 nope, modern naval battles is shooting hundreds of missiles from really far away. If an attack with these missiles would ever take place, it would be a swarm of missiles. only 3 will easily get picked off by CIWS's and other surface to air defense systems.

[@ReformedSooner24]

I swear I’ve heard the music from somewhere before

[@richardmoore609]

@@koekiejam18 a missile this fast and low to the water is very hard to lock on the fly

[@tony9146]

I love the direction Lockheed Martin is going with this drop. Finally copped a couple of new LRASM after missing the initial launch and all the restocks.

[@colers2366]

It is the year 2022, and we now know: Yes, the Slava class missile cruiser indeed needs 2 missiles to die

[@anderslindstrom2336]

Not only does it die to just two missiles, it dies to just two non-stealthy Harpoon-skis.

[@D3R3bel]

Russia : hypes up every single one of their military equipment and gives completely fictacious claims as to their capabilities US DOD : OH FUCK OH NO WE NEED NEXT GEN TECH TO STAY RELEVANT NOWWWW *Accidentally makes weapon 20 years ahead of enemy tech*

[@Husker513]

Many people thought it's not true and pentagon's dream, but it's real

[@randomperson5775]

@@D3R3bel isnt that how the F-15 was made

[@D3R3bel]

@@randomperson5775 yes.

[@Johnspartansworld]

Lockheed Martin is uploading the videos on youtube like peoples gonna buy it xddddd

[@captainawasome8985]

I buy their stocks so... that makes me part owner of those cool toys! - Even if i cant have fun with them myself.

[@thechlebek901]

*secret technology*

[@liberatetheworld1776]

It’s been tested and proven.

[@m_louie]

We are i mean its expensive but it is worth it i mean the technology behind it all is amazing

[@liberatetheworld1776]

Just wait until a war where America can use theses babies.

[@joshuafang3033]

It seems like we don't need to worry about the Slava class anymore

[@larrylyon6695]

The Rapid Dragon launches up to 9 palletized LRSMS from a C-17 or C-130 at one time instead of only 2 from an F-18. Using cargo airplanes to launch LRSM swarms is a big force multiplier in both land attack and surface warfare. Tests confirmed the concept in January 2022.

[@benjaminherrington8124]

who the fuck are you larry

[@e.s.4017]

Back here after they released a video recently and holy shit

[@mfawls9624]

Those things are scary beautiful.

[@Gigachadent]

How would it fare if enemy ships had a similar CIWS defense system as the phalanx?

[@hermes_0440]

@@Gigachadent A Single CWIS has around 2500 rounds of ammo and a rate of fire of ca. 60 Rounds per second. A C-17 can carry 45 LRASM/JASSM. If you do the math (2500/45=55) it shows that you can only use 55 rounds per Missile before you need to reload wich leaves no room for missing also it has to be reloaded manually wich is very dangerous during a battle. If you have two CWIS like the Burke class the you have better chances as long as only one C-17 drops rapid dragon. The best defence you could have is what the German Bundesmarine(Federal Navy) is doing and mount cannons that use FAPDS or AHEAD ammunition like the Mantis system.

[@TheMiniatureRobot]

When AWACS Longcaster says "Counteract enemy CIWS with a low approach or use missiles outside of intercept range"

[@freyawion5337]

Both. Both is good.

[@karmavisuals3645]

Longcaster says that while casually eating

[@yaboikungpowfuckfinger7697]

Lunchcaster*

[@Panchoproductions2069]

True

[@sillylittleowlguy2392]

Oh yeah, it’s Gripen time

[@realexivus950]

Back in WWII, they called those Japanese pilots.

[@randomguy-pv2rk]

Lol

[@somethingsomethingname25]

Lol

[@chansedowning3800]

RealExivus nice one lol

[@gyrozeppeli6716]

kamikazes

[@ronancollins4006]

I came into the comments expecting questions, not laughs 😂😂

[@simula152]

Imagine you're in the year 2030. You're a pilot and accidentally fire this missile and you think of nothing, but 30 minutes later you get a "Friendly Fire -50 pts" pop-up

[@Wickedonezz]

It requires previous lock on

[@vereinigtekonigreicheoster35]

To be fair nowadays missiles lock on very quickly

[@guyschell2321]

I was in Afghanistan in the brigade TOC when the Air Force accidentally dropped a 500 pound bomb on one of our own bases because they got the bad guys position and the good guys position mixed up WHEN DROPPING A 500 FUCKING POUND BOMB a JDAM and you never heard about it lol

[@MickShoemaker17]

"You will be returned to the hanger if you continue to harm frendlies"

[@PrethorynPete]

Imagine this: FUNNY DID LAUGH

[@Chimpunk729]

Love it when LM shows a realistic render even using competitor's F/A 18 to support the realistic. Great.

[@MercilessMike9]

Are they really competitors if the main shareholders for both are Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard?

[@supreme_nova]

When will this game release? Looks realistic af

[@karanmedhane835]

savangiinduuri But in reality this is unrealistic af

[@sheeplord4976]

CMNAO

[@karanmedhane835]

tron No mate that weapon is shit

[@Apollo-tj1vm]

2019, Ace combat 7

[@myinfoisgone3868]

Welcome to camp woosh

[@ludicrousspeed6422]

It's amazing how good those computers onboard the missile need to be.

[@yotamxo]

got the rtx

[@Panchoproductions2069]

16gb ram

[@jmcglockYT]

AMD 9

[@sussy9278]

420 ram

[@椰好耶]

导弹搭在的cpu运算性能实际真不算高。。

[@quantomic1106]

Is this on steam?

[@ashwanishahrawat4607]

Well played :D

[@f22rhaptor]

Actually in Arma 3 some mods make this possible

[@phalcon23]

You want DCS... its an actual simulator.

[@IvanNava]

Ace Combat 7

[@4ries2209]

Ace Combat 7 is vr games, cant afford VR

[@sirethanthegreat4069]

How ironic. In the vid, the Moskva died. Couple years later that exact thing happened, but with Neptune missiles.

[@сергейКурмыза-щ4й]

Typical propaganda: in reality, Mosva was sunked by the frogman, not missile. Neptune is just a copy of the Russian Uran missile.

[@pvt.potato1943]

​@@сергейКурмыза-щ4йDoes that really make it better?

[@pvt.potato1943]

​@@сергейКурмыза-щ4йInstead of your flagship being sunk by a guided missile, it was sunk by some bloke with an explosive charge underwater.

[@sethb3090]

@user-tm3si7pw3u So you're saying a Russian anti ship missile couldn't have done the job? Reject missile, return to frog

[@nonplayablecarecter1712]

@@сергейКурмыза-щ4й Russian bot detected

[@darkenkgb5812]

1:28 thank god the camera guy survived

[@wiwbssjh8233]

Lol

[@massib4523]

it was a drone

[@shridhars1821]

hhahahaaaa

[@thechlebek901]

@@massib4523 no, he typed sv_cheats 1 1 and was in noclip stop making jokes about dangerous jobs he almost died

[@williampercival7662]

These weapons of distruction are only good for killing ourselves, that's human intelligence. William Percival New Zealand Gardenia Band 🇨🇰 Kia Orana

[@plague6566]

Ace combat fans: Hey,I've seen this one before

[@mystyle_jm8997]

Land-Attack Cruise Missile? Superior than LAGM and LASM as a combination between Damage Output and Blast Radius.

[@viruspter1dactl]

True on my channel i play ac7

[@viruspter1dactl]

@@mystyle_jm8997 NO LSAM

[@thebuddy4517]

Lockheed Martin=gründer industries

[@scarface1367]

@@thebuddy4517 wait, that actually makes sense

[@CHUUMPASS]

this is actually very exciting to watch. the tension constantly builds to the boiling point until the perfect climax and happy end. serious topic, but this definitely makes for an entertaining presentation.

[@JamesWitte]

Orgasmic war porn you mean

[@Trojan0304]

Recent sinking show Russian ships can’t shoot down regular missiles let alone a stealth type

[@tracym8952]

Worry about china's missle defense systems. They might work like how we thought russia's would

[@LRRPFco52]

There were leaked reports on how their systems were non mission-capable, unmaintained, crews not trained, SAMs didn't work, Radars nowhere near ready for deployment, but they needed show of force.

[@arizonamidnight5294]

@@tracym8952 we'll find out soon enough

[@unsungheroes8556]

@@tracym8952 china missile tech and defense systems is a copy from russia so.

[@deebil8099]

@@tracym8952 China's missile defense systems are copies of Russia's missile defense systems. Even if they don't break, they are still designed to not work like the Russian missile defense system.

[@scarface1367]

Me: just browsing youtube for some new videos KZbin: let's throw you some experimental military porn from 4 years ago because why not Edit: how and why did this get so much attention

[@pizapizo]

I actually searched it up lol

[@boualengdouavangthao5262]

H. And

[@seantaggart7382]

@@marrakesh_3589 *Glare* (Careful on impact there's an idiot here) (On it)

[@scarface1367]

@Shawn Esquilona it is dedication

[@manesiaphuto367]

L

[@fieryspy6414]

You forgot to turn on RTX

[@Phenom98]

The missile would travel at just 50% of the speed if u turn that shit on.

[@Anderson_Hwang]

missile would travel at 30 fps only

[@drixan563]

What RTX means??

[@Anderson_Hwang]

@@drixan563 Ray tracing, a technology that traces light in real time, its on NVIDIA graphics cards and somehow became a meme

[@OctogonOxygen024816]

@@Anderson_Hwang is it hard on the graphics card or something?

[@theephemeralglade1935]

"Did we score at least a hit?!" "Yes Captain! " "Oh thank God! Those three missiles were one year's worth of the entire Navy's budget!"

[@sunrisejackdaw1779]

"Good news, we've bankrupted the United States Navy!" "What's the bad news?" "We're out of ships to use."

[@-coolerlegothings-9784]

An attack like this would cost around 12 million for the missiles, but at least the enemy lost something 100 times as valuable

[@jurajsintaj6644]

@@-coolerlegothings-9784 yep, destroyers cost about 1 billion, and the Moskva was a very expensive cruiser

[@jurajsintaj6644]

If you're working with the Russian navy budget, atleast

[@tobyw9573]

F-35s are now cheaper to buy than F-18s. Gotta consider how much is paid for development, startup, and service.

[@Tobiasdg365]

1:22 The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

[@Matthias-fk5md]

Genau so funktioniert das. Blöd nur daß die Dinger 9 mal langsamer sind als russische Raketen.

[@russa4836]

Fun fact , 4.16 This warship is now really wrecked.

[@efzap6516]

To a missile system that is far inferior to this. Lmao

[@burroaks7]

@@efzap6516 prophetic irony at its finest

[@josephkermitjoestar3881]

not really wrecked, just converted into a permanent underwater warship.

[@davidv.2050]

Moskva on special mission to Davy Jones Locker.

[@keepingcalm6469]

Westerners exagerate - the fire is under control now.

[@firstnamelastname7113]

So that's what the highest graphics setting looks like

[@Aryan-iv5kt]

Call Of Duty Modern Warfare : 2026

[@vaclavmalecek2917]

Man he was lucky af ngl

[@thechlebek901]

*water fiziks*

[@erichschneider4759]

Battlefield 8

[@lushhclub819]

Lockheed letting the enemy know what to expect so they can develope a counter measure

[@MrCoolguy425]

If the enemy didn’t know what to expect before this video went up, I don’t think we need to worry about development of anything, let alone a countermeasure.

[@tollevkvendbo]

@@MrCoolguy425 'the enemy' being?

[@overlord4404]

If this is the best they can offer then "the enemy" has nothing to worry about

[@MrCoolguy425]

@@tollevkvendbo the enemy being anyone. If Any nation that wants to develop a countermeasure to this, didn’t know about the weapons development itself before this video went up, through various methods, then they likely are not a nation that would have the ability to develop a countermeasure to it.

[@munk_ken]

How else to you get new contracts?

[@EnergYbomB]

4:16 hey, thats the moskwa Lockheed Martin already knew it 2016

[@TrikeSquadron]

if you can do it in Kerbal Space Program... it will work in the real world of course.

[@emielsnoeijers]

BD armory mod is the best! XD

[@peqbox]

Lol

[@artwingtonr.4647]

I never know how to use the BD armory cruise missile.

[@mansoorsandhue4682]

+KingKL h

[@PaiSAMSEN]

Set GPS coordinate, assign it to the missile, then assign a key to launch your missile, or simply right click on it, then select "fire".

[@vandarkholme4745]

amazing how much length we go to blow each other up

[@rock3tcatU233]

I know, awesome right?

[@NOU-iw3gb]

@@zeffez8161 "Sad" lmao. Stfu cupcake

[@belgianfried]

@@NOU-iw3gb If you had not chosen to use slang words like "stfu" and "lmao", maybe I would've taken you seriously. Grow up, idiotic youth.

[@Homunculus144]

@@belgianfried those arent words nor are they slang

[@FungalumisBush]

@@zeffez8161 if you think about it, with how dangerous the us is, people probably wont fight us. All the nations know that if nuclear war broke out, humanity would go extinct. I feel that despite all the hate we have for eachother, we all still agree on to not wipe ourselves out.

[@ya_boi_zach5140]

Me at 3 AM: I need sleep. Also me: hehe long range missile go b o o m

[@sarahsolari628]

better: POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

[@HurricaneOK1]

It's so convenient that I can put LRASM in both a VLS, and on my F/A-18 daily driver. With budgets for every day items being tight right now, a multipurpose stealth long range anti-ship missile like LRASM really helps out. Thank you, Lockeed Martin.

[@TheArakhan]

Have you seen this after Moskva sunk?

[@NguyenLyubyuStrana]

It not sunk,it turn into submarine

[@tobyw9573]

@@NguyenLyubyuStrana Several subs, I expect.

[@fred7832]

Two Neptune are enough.

[@CLKlasse]

Update 2022, Moskva ship number 121 have sink in black sea.

[@cordellwordlaw3390]

Lockheed Martin is the best and most important defense corporation that we have. And Skunkworks makes the sexiest aircraft to ever exist!

[@trekkie1]

Six years later, this become true

[@keepingcalm6469]

Also the desired point of impact seemed to be fitting.... maybe this video inspired something :)

[@Rocky-kx4vo]

Imagine all that machines hard work and calculations for nothing because some big ass bird accidentally hit it out of the sky😂

[@lorentzcoffin4957]

million dollar missile vs Albatross

[@vicmic7936]

😂😂😂😂

[@PySnek]

the enemy has also countermeasures and will shoot the LRASM down

[@dylankolby5450]

@@PySnek no no no..... It's American, remember?

[@PriceTheCourier]

@@PySnek Well, I think this Missile is much harder to detect so before they know it. It's already too late.

[@АлександрРусаков-ц6т]

1 beautiful movie filmed 2 money taken 3 received bonuses 4 went to drink vodka and dreaming about bonuses 5 supply to the army, what the fuck the army, better show our rocket in the next Iron Man

[@alexanderwarriner8481]

Bye bye Moskva. Give the graphic design team a raise lol.

[@osvaldomedina2577]

Exactly..😊😊😊.......the graph is from Moskva, fuck you Putin

[@w_elder2199]

meanwhile red CIWS: "am i joke to you?"

[@jeffreyprezalar220]

Not that the ciws is a joke but these missles supposedly almost triple the stealth profile of f22 and in thei final attack phase they are wave riders.

[@LMau-t9r]

@@jeffreyprezalar220 wanted to point that out

[@w_elder2199]

@Ee 3D lol same shit bruh

[@MotoControlRu]

@Ee 3D They got nothing on modern ones. Modern russian cruisers sink themselves.

[@FarizTrinidad]

ciwis lol

[@incendiumpf1814]

Brilliant engineering, the terminal altitude adjustment will really help the missiles dodge SAM threats and Anti-missile threats.

[@ee-ef8qr]

It does that by dodging radar.

[@pigpigabcde]

spoiler:you don't need three lrasm to sink a slava class cruiser

[@Ryan_Christopher]

Well technically it was two missiles for the cruiser, and one for the destroyer.

[@huafu7639]

Just need a strom and rain lol

[@AllDay3090]

As of 2022, the Russian ship in this video is now a submarine.

[@brandonng4292]

This video has aged like fine wine. Keep up the fight, Ukraine!

[@giovannimatichecchia5656]

I asked my wife a couple of those for Christmas, but she told me to try and be nicer with the neighbour instead.

[@coldfoot99]

A lot really depends upon how many weapons you can deploy against each vessel. A single missile would likely have little chance but multiple threats become more difficult to deal with.

[@Tounguepunchfartbox]

Whole point of this system is to mitigate that. Instead of 10, you gave good chances with 1 or 2.

[@godmode8687]

I Guess that depends on how modern your enemy is. Google About how bad russian and sovjet designs were for the usability. Chances are high the one ukrainian missile for example was detected as a dot on the rader. And had the Operator been at 100% easily been neutralized. But sovjet design never was optimised for user experience. And that is importans as fatigue makes all Radar etc useless otherwise. So many missiles van either be better as they overwhelm the enemy, or worse as they alert the enemy sooner so he van start countermeasures.

[@atroxiv]

Don't worry, we've fixed this problem and are now going to drop 10 or so of them out of a cargo plane using a pallet system, completely saturating 1 or more targets.

[@rn-2196]

Lockheed Martin predicted the demise of the moskva 6 years ago😂

[@wyattsman2492]

The military: we need a new gun Lockheed Martin :

[@geonerd]

Cute cartoon, but In the REAL WORLD, the Rooskies will actually make an effort to defend themselves.

[@TheInfamousMrFox]

They'll try, sure. But they're 2 decades behind the west in technology, hence them losing a ground war to Ukraine. Then there's the fact they have an economy worth less than Italy which really hampers both development of new tech and their ability to field any significant number of anything even vaguely advanced.

[@williamalm9603]

that is not really true, they have a lot of gear that is advanced enough to fight war. especially on the army side. The tanks and infantry fighting vehicles are good. and so is the anti air. That is a thing that is often forgotten. a A10 is no use without air superiority.

[@lukasvtipil9951]

In matter of defending against anti ship missiles is russia actually in front of Nato. In reality two or three asm are no problem for rusian cwis if they have the best cwis (probably the kashtan cwis)

[@heyhoe168]

Well, Russia is quite good at drawing propaganda anime too.

[@williamalm9603]

the thing is. you never drop two or three from the same direction. You dop ten from different direktions (if you know that you can not over load the system) by that i mean that you send enough missiles to brake though the defenses. That is the Russian doctrine. They know that the Aegis system is too good to fool with a small amount of missiles so they try to overrun it.

[@alexjhonson6724]

4:33 Osean XO Fleet : " Captain! We've just lost ship 3 and 4! We're taking heavy damage!" Osean Captain Fleet : "it's like this monster is toying with us out there, we've got to do something"

[@hampterofficial]

This feels awfully like an actual teaser for a movie.

[@kimjong-uny4884]

Can I have one?

[@dongchankim2417]

I know you've been nice this year, but US couldn't trust you yet...so, sorry, not for now...

[@ulgrinscpguvenligi4868]

Nuke

[@drivethru7565]

No you cant

[@LuftUberSoldat]

Wait for secreat santa for this year May be U got the chance with armed one

[@blazingfox2913]

Never

[@code-in-rhyme]

But Moskva sank yesterday, by 2 Neptun.

[@iflycentral]

Love how the mode change animation sound is the same as the fasten seat belt sign audio alert in most airlines.

[@coffeeisthepathtovictory1290]

It's just. This really needs to be in 4k. Hello from 2023.

[@Steppy-qx9tq]

Why is the comment section full of “military geniuses”?

[@Pwnzistor]

Everyone on the internet thinks they know everything.

[@fate-csgoandmore6185]

literally every other comment section

[@chingghishan5707]

A JET THAT SHOOTS ANOTHER JET?!?!? OWO?!?!?!?

[@lamao2504]

Surely they asked google...

[@miksuko]

@@Pwnzistor definitely not everyone. Kinda ironic that you say that and are wrong like that.

[@scraptent2908]

"The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't."

[@YOLO___]

Lol Neptune got the kill first, sorry guys. 🤣🤣

[@notjeih]

i have came back to this very ad to considering buying myself four of these LRASM for special military operations

[@No_Way_NO_WAY]

Already used them on the PTS. Great addition to the game.

[@xPrevailingGaming]

When an nerd on the Internet thinks they know more than the companies who have been designing and supplying the defense industry for many decades.

[@LilBoulevard]

When it’s an official channel

[@unassigned6106]

Do you even know Lockheed Martin?

[@yukinokf2480]

Vande you’re dumb lol

[@fakeaintreal]

ye but you stupid to not realise this "video" is biased as fuck, so its a very cool missile but you have to consider that its the company behind the missile that is also making this video.---

[@ronin-dp6ls]

fakeaintreal ye but ur idiot im smart ok shut up noob at researching on videos ISIOT

[@Elliott300]

Lmao i love how they use a russian destroyer as the target 😂😂😂😂

[@عبداللّٰهبنأبيبكرالجلال]

How did you know it is russian?!!

[@thatlithuanianboi6812]

@@عبداللّٰهبنأبيبكرالجلال whole ship looks like Slava class, which is - indeed Russian

[@tonyfortier8835]

Weapons manufacturers dream for a war with Russia. You can't make money when you're not at war when you make weapons

[@ryanchuabowen2045]

The US's enemy is Russia. This ads prob catered to US officials, so why not?

[@tonyfortier8835]

@@ryanchuabowen2045 it certainly isnt catered To average joes like you and me my friend. And acquiring an fighter jet isn't as easy as buying a pack of gum !

[@juansolo7485]

These offer so much utility, bought one for my wife and she loves it.

[@PMMM9]

Nice animation; Does it actually work?

[@jayyoutube8790]

It sure dose.. In fact, their is a lot more to it than what was shown, but it was classified.. That's where the magic happens

[@bonkersblock]

You should give Lockheed the coordinates of your house and tell them to use LRASM to find out if it works??😂

[@docark3224]

Hahaha.... soo true.

[@marconius101]

If the other party, sleeps, doesn't look and is totally incapable. Yeah sure...

[@jayyoutube8790]

They would never see it comming..

[@coconinodave]

That animation was absolutely amazing!

[@hektikethnik]

Everything can be the ultimate next generation weapon as long as it's still in the R&D phase.

[@TheMemeDynamics]

I'm here after Moskva went into a special anti-submarine operation in the Black Sea

[@crimsonstang]

Great, I'm sure Russia really liked this. A video demonstrating a new missile, and their ships were used.

[@MrDuckie00]

Nobody messes with the U.S. Navy were coming for you

[@monsta1359]

Who cares, Russia does the same thing when doing a virtual demonstration.

[@АлексейСуханов-х7з]

russian have some nukes tho

[@BlakeC94]

Russia does not. They will never be militarily better than the US. End of...

[@crimsonstang]

+The South 803 that's not entirely true.

[@AsterEmanon]

OK, this video needs remastered ASAP! Change the Slava into 055, or nobody will buy the LRASM!😂

[@MrBucket9158]

new warthunder update looks fire!

[@TheGlitch93]

Yeah bro, New smoke and exhaust effects

[@cooperfrench1]

Is the red force cruiser design based on the russian Atlant class? It looks just like the Moskva that was sunk by two Ukrainian ASMs last month.

[@tracym8952]

The cgi model is the muskrat, I mean moskva, at the bottom of the black sea

[@MironSmithX]

The same hull number as "Moskva", 4:18

[@nafisfuadayon6832]

And it happened in real life in 2022! according to Ukraine. But Naptune instead of LARSAM.

[@BLUEKOMMEH]

So what I've gotten from this video is that this missile system only works if the enemy possesses literally no functioning counter-measures whatsoever

[@chucktowne]

@pepinillo fresco But its a long range anti-ship MISSILE (LRASM). Last time I checked, drones don't have explosive warheads and slam into objects on purpose. Drones carry missiles to do that for them. Idiot!

[@chucktowne]

@pepinillo fresco someone doesn't understand its the internet where you cant see facial expressions. how the fuck am i to know you're joking if you don't use words like "kappa" or "j/k". HUH? Tell me smart guy!!!!!!!!! LUL

[@punchmoi]

chucktowne israel destroyed advance chinese radar with

[@chucktowne]

@@punchmoi whats your point and how does that have anything to do with my comment?

[@razrv3lc]

They're almost undetectable by radar just like it's brother JASSM missiles. Its radar signature is like the size of a small bird and wouldn't be noticed by anti-air systems until it's too late to stop it.

[@타농부-n8b]

And actually Moskva sank with two missiles

[@tuphan4134]

Ukraine high command never confirm they shoot it, only the mayor of the city say it, do you guys really believe in that propanganda ?

[@k1tsun386]

@@ntf5211 Nimitz was older than the Moskva and still in service

[@kadendookie178]

Was sunk by a missile system inferior to this

[@Ghent_Halcyon]

1. Holy fuck this animation is god tier 2. Bold of them to assume that their CIWS are working.

[@spaceted3977]

Amazing !!! I remember using a flight Sim in the 1990s flying a Raptor and using LRASM and MRASM missiles. If they work they are a fantastic weapon !!! It seems we are on a runaway train to WW3 and we will need every smart weapon we can get to beat Russia, China and North Korea combined !!!!

[@СергейМинин-я7в]

И Россия, Китай и Северная Корея в течение 25 минут сделают США съёмочной площадкой для фильмов про марсианские пустыни😁

[@AlexeyMironchenkowoodgoblin]

@@СергейМинин-я7в Не забывай, ядреная война очень жестока. И у НАТО после глобального обмена останутся силы и авиаразведка, чтобы сделать Россию действительно необитаемой до Урала. Я не думаю, что в России этого хотят. Особенно когда у самой России меньше десятка птичек, способных разведывать США, а оптических вообще две и это количество не будет увеличиваться.

[@СергейМинин-я7в]

@@AlexeyMironchenkowoodgoblin а кто сказал, что нато будет что-то делать после уничтожения сша?

[@СергейМинин-я7в]

@@AlexeyMironchenkowoodgoblin не забывай прятаться в подвале. Кстати, мы рассматриваем конфликт НАТО vs ОДКБ+КНР, так что сил хватит

[@Раковийсупець]

@@СергейМинин-я7в во-первых, даже если допустить что половина из 5к боеголовок рф + 300 боеголокок КНР куда-то именно в Штатах долетят -- уничтожить их полностью не получится, и именно по причинам, которые я заявил. Невозможность доразведки и уничтожения целей о итогам первых ударов. У КНР с этим, может, немного получше чем у рф, но ничего не заменит авиаразведку, которой смогут заниматься НАТО в РФ, но не смогут ни КНР, ни РФ. У НАТО же, напротив, есть мобильная морская составляющая, уничтожить которую полностью в такой короткий срок, который будет отведен при глобальном обмене, не представляется возможным. Она-то и будет заниматься именно уничтожением всего, включая население, потому что ядерные удары будут нанесены и по мирняку и там уже далее стесняться нечего. Подумай об этом, когда будешь что-то тявкать про уничтожение, ты ж сам, дурак, не выживешь, и страна твоя. Практически единственные, кто гарантированно будет уничтожен.

[@kyojima7190]

Realty just showed us that once been blinded by a preliminary drone attack, battle ships are absolutely unprotected against such attacks.

[@TerryTerius]

That was mostly because the radar they had couldn’t look in all directions at once. Rather than being a general weakness of modern ships. So once the Ukrainians distracted their limited radar, they had no ability to tell those missiles were incoming.

[@sunrisejackdaw1779]

@@TerryTerius It's a bit like getting someone's attention with a flare and then throwing a grenade at them while they are distracted.

[@scottycatman]

Super realistic footage. I got seasick from all the random camera pans, such a perfect simulation of sailor life!

[@Noobixm]

I like how in every one of these ads they always make the enemy completely helpless to defend against whatever thing they’re showing off. If it was that easy then there wouldn’t even be any wars.

[@nebblepoppishire3037]

4:35 They did, the close-in rotary cannons. This is a sub sonic sea skimming stealth missile, the radar detection range is very small. There have been multiple times where sea skimming missiles have slid past the enemy, some not even going to general quarters before the explosion. That’s the point of sea skimming ASCMs. And this happened to the ship in the video, the Moskva, in 2022, with 2 sea skimming missiles (neptunes though) and the Moskva didn’t even have time to respond, wasn’t even in battle readiness. If you design the tech and deploy it well enough, it truly is *that* easy. Even Chinese defense scientists said the LRASM stands to “change the game rules”, it’s very capable.

[@meintingles4396]

Where can I read about the Chinese defense scientists saying this? @@nebblepoppishire3037

[@AntonGudenus]

In this add the cruiser Moskva (discernable by its 121 hull number at 4:20) is sunk by the impact of two anti-ship cruise missiles, while sailing in calm waters. So this actually is life immitating art.

[@aerohk]

I'm very curious, why doesn't a LM video uses F-35, and instead use a Boeing plane. Does the F-35 support the missile?

[@dreadnought-ai]

Aerohk hmm good question

[@donaldhobin4774]

Sure does both f-35 f-22 do plus the missile no one mentioned yet. The us top secret anti ship missiles

[@opponeo7805]

Aerohk because f 35 is totally junk

[@AllThingsCubey]

F35A, B and C will al mount it externally in later software upgrades. Not an issue as the LRASM itself is a lower RCS than the F35.

[@AllThingsCubey]

M L It's detrimental to stealth but only slightly. The F35 has been designed with low visibility pylons for external ordnance as it is, and no the LRASM will not drastically increase the RCS of the F35. A small amount of reflection between the upper surface of the weapon and the lower surface of the wing will provide a radar return, but given the strength of the F35s electronic countermeasures and overall stealthy design, it's a much better platform than FA18E/F to launch LRASM.

[@Peizxcv]

Subsonic ASM is like bringing a prop plane to a jet dogfight.

[@AccordGTR]

even f they r stealth?

[@Peizxcv]

+Nico Montinola Even if they are stealth as Goalkeeper and similar CIWS in Russia and China's arsenal have multiband radar and optical tracking. A slow flying missile just mean it will give CIWS more time to track and engage.

[@benitollan]

high supersonic at sea level? yeah right. Not at sea level then? OK let's be detected at very long distance. Supersonic seaskimming? instantaneous detection when it pops up over the horizon. Subsonic seaskimming? less probability of fast detection after popping up over the horizon. Weapons shit is classified, how do we now it doesn't have supersonic terminal speed and/or other measures? Oh yeah because it's easy to assume ridiculously high wage weapons engineers and strategists are stupid.

[@ThomasWilliamsLewis]

Finally someone who knows what they are talking about.

[@2020Max1]

If you are relying on CIWS to shoot down incoming missiles you have already lost the engagement.  CIWS is the last line of defense and in most cases still results in damage to the target ship even if the CIWS successfully hits the incoming missile.

[@pixynowwithevenmorebelkanb6965]

recon: i found LRASM! Commander: nah, we supposed to forget to make it look good

[@avery1647]

The blip in the radar would just remain for a few second and it would dive to near surface levels so it wouldn't get detected by radar, you only see clearly when its too late

[@adiorthotos]

@0:34 Is that the now _late_ Moskva cruiser?

[@tracym8952]

Yes

[@Henry-xu5jg]

Lol. Now it’s at the bottom of the black sea

[@onesmexyredneck]

These videos are put together better than some others on KZbin, I wouldn't expect that coming out of a military company

[@hugo511]

So pretty much kamikaze drones that can be launched from aircraft I like it

[@jamespulford3892]

How are thy kamikaze nothing to do with that

[@Kuro_2712]

@@jamespulford3892 r/wooosh

[@meinfraulein380]

Ohka

[@33mauriciom]

amazing how the missile perform multiple scape technics from the adversary's detection systems. it would be interesting to have a missile that drop on the water and transform itself in a torpedo to hit and damage the capacity of moviment of the adversary's ships so they become an static target for the navy aircrafts

[@louisbabycos106]

They actually have had that for a long time now . It's not as effective as you might think though.

[@graceshiflett6526]

Torps go pretty damn slow in comparison to a glide bomb or a missle

[@rykehuss3435]

@@graceshiflett6526 True but theyre even stealthier than any missile can be

[@snailboi6902]

imagine you shoot down a missile and seconds after it falls into the water your sonar team detects loud pings coming from one kilometer away

[@justit1074]

@@rykehuss3435 Hydro acoustics:

[@FourBrothers-s3f]

Go, Lockheed Martin! You are our favourite missile and Fighter Jet brand. This missile you have shown in the video is destined to become a success. Keep up the good work.

[@iancoles1349]

Pick a stormy day with aid of targeting measure and let it fly. Up yours Ruski

[@grandstarchief3226]

Slava class... Thanks for helping Lockheed to get the contract. lol.

[@cragchannel2549]

So we finally re-invented the Yokosuka MXY-7 "Ohka" but in UAV form? Absolutely Beautiful. - And even better, it's now launched by both ship and air this time!

[@randominternetguy88]

it's not really a UAV- more of a gliding missile

[@georg1875]

@@randominternetguy88 it's a cruise missle xD

[@therandomlaniusedward2140]

Ohka but no one is harmed after impact (if you ignore enemies)

[@bsd107]

Looks great, although apparently you don’t need an F/A-18E and LRASM to kill a Slava-class cruiser. Just a drone and a couple of ground-launched Neptunes should do the trick.

[@-p2349]

Neptunes are also 50 year old technology and aren’t even used in the US military Anymore

[@brokenpotato438]

@@-p2349 hes reffering to the Ukranian Neptune which is completely different design, and was used to sink a slava class carrier in real life a few months ago

[@AntonGudenus]

@@brokenpotato438 Not just any Slava class. The very same Slava as depicted in this video (look at the hull number at 4:20)

[@zujiahuang8454]

new war thunder update looks great, I hope F-18E(LRASM) is not premium)))

[@vnyggi621]

@isrgntv _ Superhornet? Maybe in 20 years

[@samovarmaker9673]

I see more people talking about triggered Russians in the comment section than actual triggered Russians in the comment section.

[@crumb6332]

I see more people talking about people talking about triggered Russians in the comments section than actual people talking about triggered Russians

[@jesser5127]

That's because Russia and China are the biggest enemies of the US. It is actually more so China than Russia.

[@yourmom705]

usa still thinks russia is the ussr

[@valso]

@@yourmom705 Because it is. Communism still rules there.

[@replysoon3216]

@@jesser5127 Russia is not an enemy of the United States. Stop spreading fake news from the Clinton News Network.

[@alptekinakturk4185]

Shouldn’t it be classified? Like top of the top level? Cause now with that knowledge they can easily develop counter measures?

[@razrv3lc]

This stuff is public knowledge. They'd need specifics to counter this. The specifics are classified.

[@sheeplord4976]

All this video showed was that it is launched by ship or boat, goes a long distance, is powered by jet, flies high until it finds its target, and avoids anti missile fire. Nothing on range, methods of target ID, identification sensors, speed, ect.

[@adarshpandey8023]

Counter measures may not be that easy.

[@viruspter1dactl]

No... They only show what it can do not how it does it i mean like compenets and also it goes really low what is a sub gonna get a underwater cwis?

[@honkhonk8009]

Thats because this tech is dated by at least 10+ years and lockheed is trying to sell it to other governments like India. For sure 10-20 years ago this stuff was cutting edge but now its dated so they can sell it

[@ДмитроКислинський-г1н]

Two Ukrainian missiles "Neptun" was enough to destroy this "powerful" cruiser.

[@tylerwilliams33]

Ukrainian? Okay.

[@eze3922]

@@tylerwilliams33 it was the ukrainian modified version of the soviet one.

[@masonhidari]

@@tylerwilliams33 whats the difference , the point was something else

[@FannaD]

@@eze3922 No, this is actually a Ukrainian development, which was created based on Soviet documentation.

[@AckzaTV]

Who cares? The war is on the land and russia took a lot of land from ukraine ...no way ukraine can resist the entire russian military . It's over .