Thanks for the video. A bit of feedback: the music is way too loud in this video in comparison to the narrator's vocals volume.
@mco259 ай бұрын
Agreed.
@Harnam999 ай бұрын
yes, it’s irritating
@sunset30529 ай бұрын
Good point
@Logan11thMEU9 ай бұрын
First time Ive seen the GE90s I could not believe how huge they are. I could literally drive my car inside it
@johniii81479 ай бұрын
I wouldn’t advise that
@GarrettWorcester9 ай бұрын
@@johniii8147 - Sounds like fun to me! What could possibly go wrong?🤣🤣🤣🤣😟😲 ☠
@johniii81479 ай бұрын
@@GarrettWorcester It was a funny comment, I will give him that.
@rollingreene12209 ай бұрын
Super focused video - I'm a jet mechanic from way back and really enjoyed the overview of the major turbofan manufacturers - I'm familiar with PW so they are definitely my favorite
@Chris_at_Home9 ай бұрын
I worked on the assembly floor 1 1/2 years building JT8s and JT-9s in the late 70s. The Dads and oldest brothers of both my wife and I retired from there. I quit and moved to Alaska to work in electronics and communications which worked out quite well. I was an avionics technician on P-3s 50 years ago.
@johniii81479 ай бұрын
PW is trash these days.
@Chris_at_Home9 ай бұрын
@@johniii8147 They outsourced vital engine components that were made in-house years ago. My oldest brother retired from there over 20 years ago and told me about some of the crap the got from foreign countries. My best friend growing up was an engineering department head and he never seemed happy when ever we talked over the years I think the stress killed him as he retired in his late 50s and died 4 years later.
@bartholomewshirima70608 ай бұрын
What about Russian and Chinese engines?!...stop biase
@rollingreene12208 ай бұрын
@@bartholomewshirima7060 It's not bias if I've actually worked with the products - Let me know your direct experience as a Jet Mechanic on a Chinese or Russian Powerplant
@Chris_at_Home9 ай бұрын
I worked on the assembly floor at P&WA for 1 1/2 years in the late 1970s. It was a good job but not for me. I was an avionics technician in the military and went to work in electronics and communications and probably flew on jets that had engines I helped assemble. I worked mainly assembling JT-8s, but did some work on the JT-9 including a tear down after test. I moved to Alaska after I left there and I remember many of the engines went to airlines there as this was in the build paper work. Different airlines put different accessories on the engine.
@stevenholt18679 ай бұрын
My favourite has to be the Rolls Royce RB211.
@tomking18909 ай бұрын
Slow to spool up, as it is a triple spool engine.
@trevorhart5459 ай бұрын
It was nearly a disaster and led to the separation of the Car and Aero Engines parts of the Company with RR Cars going to BMW and Bentley going to VW. RR are also Nuclear Reactor Manufacturers for UK Submarines and have a significant presence in Marine Propulsion. Nice to review their military jet engines where P&W and GE Dominate through the massive scale of US Military Aircraft. The USMC is as big as many European Armies and has a significant airforce.
@amuyrizz9 ай бұрын
As Engine Mechanic, happy to watch this video
@billotto6022 ай бұрын
In my first interview for a job with a commercial airline, I was told "if we want a light bulb, we'll call GE, if we want a luxury car we'll call Rolls-Royce, but if we want a jet engine we call Pratt & Whitney". LOL. I've been partial to them because the planes I worked on in the Navy had P&W engines.
@composimple3649 ай бұрын
3:13 there is no Trent 600. Trent 800 Is the one for Boeing 777
@obelic718 ай бұрын
Fun fact Rolls Royce does not only build jet/turbine engines. It also owns now the worldfamous and historic Maybach engine Plant in Germany. Maybach was one of the 3 ICE pioneer engineers (Daimler / Otto / Maybach) who developed and lay the ground work for ALL manufacturers who build ICE engines today. MTU Builds marine, military and commercial Piston engines. Rolls Royce engines power all forms of transport form Submarines till Aircraft.
@MrPoornakumar9 ай бұрын
What is listed here is the set of Engine designers, who do manufacturing too. Many more manufacturers are there around the world, who do their job after receiving design drawings - so as to make them under license. A significant omission here, is the information on Russian Engine designers & manufacturers.
@arman32912 ай бұрын
Russian aerospace technology is dying slowly, so better not mention it.
@kuckoo90362 күн бұрын
With the exception of the PD-8 engines on the SJ-100 - an engine being adopted for use on the Sukhoi only because the French/Russian SaM-146 venture was cancelled - no Russian engine powers any Boeing, Airbus, Embraer, etc in service with airlines anywhere. And now that the major Russian airlines fly only western-built airplanes, it's probably not worth mentioning what little remains. Other than military (even that is questionable at this point), the Russian aeronautics industry is nowhere.
@MrPoornakumar2 күн бұрын
@@arman3291 Is it? They are still designing & building aircraft & engine sets. They are i use. Their design approach to "reliability" is different. They make robust things (aircraft or engine) with less number of links - to fail. In the West they add too many things to monitor performance, auto-correct, "fail-safe" etc., thus each component in the chain shares the reliability (less failure tolerant) & enhancing "over all" reliability. In India, we inherited the Western approach.
@arman329110 сағат бұрын
@@MrPoornakumar India is very poor, but has a better future than Russia. Russia is successfuly overtaken by Japan, China and potentially Brazil & India.
@4vndd9 ай бұрын
Very well researched and presented.... thanks for sharing...!!
@andrewdoubtfire47009 ай бұрын
Was RR’s engine mentioned that will now power the B52?
@BerlinAerial6 ай бұрын
No, but this one called F130, a former civil engine called BR725 (developed in Germany) as military version.
@salehwahib37496 ай бұрын
There is also MTU Aero Engines AG.
@m.ostrowski22447 ай бұрын
So Well Done !!! Is there a similar video for the Defense market worldwide ? Thank You
@pesawatindonesia9 ай бұрын
Happy New Year 2024
@etorepugatti91969 ай бұрын
Merci
@ianmaritim38769 ай бұрын
There is a mistake The Trent 600- was to power future B747-400X The Trent 800- B777-200
@composimple3649 ай бұрын
And 777-300 too.
@grantnaval45199 ай бұрын
They're all great in their own share and expertise! Luckily enough to handle their products that are installed in the aircraft commercial world! From engine servicing to engine change. Amazing works of art that makes efficiency in air travel. Possible! #GE90_115B #RR_Trent_700 #RR_TRENT_XWB #RR_TRENT_7000 #CFM56_5B #IAEV2500 #PW1100G
@Capt.OggyPeabodyOfficial8 ай бұрын
My favorites were all of them GE Aerospace (CF6, GE90, GENx,GE9X, GP7000 and LEAP) Pratt and Whitney (JT8D, PW1000G, PW2000, PW4000, V2500 and GP7000) Rolls-Royce (any members of the Trent Family)
@Gelaviation9 ай бұрын
Hi! I like your videos!
@davidmontville48859 ай бұрын
Background 'music' annoying, thankfully it's a short one
@Gelaviation9 ай бұрын
@@davidmontville4885 well I like that one video of him for PAL, the music on the A350 part is SO GOOD!
@Olifantenstaart9 ай бұрын
Good to know is that the Rolls Royce jet engine and luxury car companies are no longer affiliated.
@dodoubleg23569 ай бұрын
Anyone else heard the rumor that (per sources) the GE-90 actually produced nearly 130k-lbf on a few occasions during testing & inspections?? Just curious. ✈️ 😉✌️
@XX-zq4hv9 ай бұрын
Actually IAE is the owner of the PW1100-Program of the A320neo. Even if it has the Name „PW“, it has the same IAE Parners and in all official documents IAE is named as the OEM!
Is there a video which is sort of a spotters guide to identifying which engines are being used on which aircraft? I can never get it down, and would love to see something like that. As always, amazing work. Thank you.
@Rasscasse9 ай бұрын
I do know what you mean, It can be complicated. I can never remember them all. Some new aircraft come with an engine and there is no choice, other aircraft, you have a choice of engine manufacturer. I just remember bits of things like the later versions of the 757 were Rolls-Royce equipped, but the earlier versions of it used something else. PW I think. I do know that the Boeing 747 was originally launched with the seriously flawed PW engines, but later there were other engine options.
@sillycatgirlnya9 ай бұрын
ok but what is that music lmao
@rossnolan28839 ай бұрын
Awesome 😎
@KevinDondrea9 ай бұрын
I could name 4. I worked for one division but not the actual company. I worked for GE Lighting.
@arvidm49137 ай бұрын
Cfm and iae are not engine manufacturer. They dont have their own facilities and are just joint venture between the oems.
@europaeuropa36739 ай бұрын
What about Chinese jet engine manufacturers?
@jasminejohnston63939 ай бұрын
Here’s a fact: Rolls-Royce cars are actually made by BMW; Rolls-Royce only makes aircraft engines nowadays
@mariododik99447 ай бұрын
Rolls Royce is just a name. Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, Sumitomo, Volvo Aero are more responsible for this success. Rolls Royce almost no longer produces a single part for it, as well as for GE, it is done by other companies that supply them with ready-made turbines and compressors, for example. And they just put it all together.
@MrAntvern5 ай бұрын
ROLLS-ROYCE
@fanBladeOne9 ай бұрын
Allright lads. Let's place our bets :)
@markiangooley9 ай бұрын
Rolls-Royce engine series: traditionally named after rivers, hence Trent. I wonder if they’ll choose a river’s name for the Ultrafan’s series.
@michaelrmurphy27349 ай бұрын
Thames or Hudson or Amazon or Nile or Mississippi...?
@johniii81479 ай бұрын
Doesn’t really matter
@Robert-ow2dw9 ай бұрын
Ultrafan is not ment to be an engine, at least not in it's current form. Its a technology demonstrator.
@Rasscasse9 ай бұрын
Interesting that about the rivers. What other river name have they used besides Trent? I do know that the river Trent flows through Derbyshire south of the city of Derby. Maybe that is why, given that Derby is the home of Rolls-Royce. If I was going to choose another English river as a name, I would not choose the river Thames, just because most foreigners would pronounce it wrongly. They would not realise that the ‘H’ was not pronounced and that that would be annoying.
@johniii81479 ай бұрын
@@Robert-ow2dw True it's just a testbed at this point. RR has been publicly clear it's not a priority for them at the moment.
@frederickshayo25669 ай бұрын
No Russian engines in the list....interesting
@tayikolla62059 ай бұрын
I guess it's because it only lists manufacturers for civilian planes and a Russian doesn't have yet any civilian plane powered by a Russian engine
@eraserstp9 ай бұрын
@@tayikolla6205 Tu-204\214 and Il-96 powered by PS-90 engines, MS-21 by PD-14 engines, SSJ-100 by Russian-French SaM-146 engines, and are currently being transferred to purely Russian PD-8. But I agree that it is too early to call UEC one of the world's largest manufacturers of engines for civilian aircraft.
@katimboallan46059 ай бұрын
There is the IL-96 used by cubana Airline, the plane is powered by PS-90 jet engine built by Aviadvigatel
@EuropeanRailfanAlt9 ай бұрын
I don't think Aviadvigatel (one of the top engine producers in Russia) is in the Top 5 for Largest Jet Engine manufacturers
@Rehunauris7 ай бұрын
@@katimboallan4605Only Russian engine what could compete is PD-14 but it's not in serial production.
@johniii81479 ай бұрын
I forgot about IAE. But, they are actually not currently producing engines. Just supporting existing ones. they don’t have any new generation engines to put on the current production generation of aircraft.
@XX-zq4hv9 ай бұрын
They do have the PW1100, its a Pratt&Whitney Name but in the documentations you can See, that the company behind is IAE!
@johniii81479 ай бұрын
@@XX-zq4hv That is PW's problem plagued GTF engine. No, IAE isn't behind it other than supplying some parts and getting tons of business fixing all the problems. IAE no longer really exists as an engine maker anymore.
@Rasscasse9 ай бұрын
First thing ive done is pause the video after five seconds to try and think of different engine manufacturers. I’ve not got many. Pratt and Whitney Rolls-Royce General Electric CFM Leap Safrane Then you’ve got a Russian stuff. Do Illusysin make their own ? Then you have the Chinese making aeroplanes. Do they make their own engine? I’ll go watch the video now.
@Kumar-y3l3l3 ай бұрын
Rolls Royce ❤❤❤❤
@johnpatricklim45099 ай бұрын
Honda partnered with GE to build engines for their Hondajet....
@tahititoutou38024 ай бұрын
It started very well. Then they added this boom-boom-boom-boom "music"... 😢
@alexandergrigorov25949 ай бұрын
Jet Engine market count down to three big OEM as CFMI and IAE are basically alliances between them.
@petertimowreef90859 ай бұрын
Downvoted because you don't use metric units like normal people, not even as captions on screen.
@tonylam95489 ай бұрын
Exactly what is the difference between a turbo fan and a turbo prop??? The high by-pass turbo fan nowadays are basically a glorified turbo prop. The prop been renamed a fan and are partially hidden in a shroud to pull the wool over the ignorant public's eyes. Yes there are some gains in efficiencies, at the cost of more structural weights and complexities and contra rotating props do have a reputation of being noisy. The other thing the public do not seems to know is , we are still struggling with the "sound barrier" for that last 3/4 century. A "jet" that is a speed record holder just beat the next runner up by maybe 3 kts. The time had gone ways into fixing some handling problems at the coffin's corner and economy, but turbines are still at a disadvantage in fuel consumption , compare with pistons. For really long distances, such as crossing the Pacific, big airlines still have the edge over the smaller jets. For trips like NY to HKG or even Sydney non stop, I feel much more comfortable in a 787 than a Challenger, especially going there against the prevailing wind.
@bireswarhalder97659 ай бұрын
Why no Russian engine mentioned?
@princediego46739 ай бұрын
Please turn down or remove the music. I love simple flying videos, but they are unwatchable with this music. Just go back to narrator only. The music starting and stopping is just awful.
@Rasscasse9 ай бұрын
Agreed
@aineshscreation95439 ай бұрын
GE Aerospace
@cellevangiel59734 ай бұрын
Please keep in mind that only Americans still use the Imperical units. And a lot of you viewers are not.
@euloge9969 ай бұрын
👍
@marceloluispanis7 ай бұрын
EMBRAER
@miker32983 ай бұрын
China and Russia don't get a mention!
@grandnagus58519 ай бұрын
With P&W and Rolls Royce having significant issues with some of their products, it's hard for me to choose a favorite. In theory the best product should be the one that fits the customer the best, and has the lowest fuel burn and is the quietest. That being said, a product that is all that, but has issues, and prevents airplanes from being delivered or grounded as a result, can't be good. The quality of the overall product "jet engine" needs to become better, we've seen way too many issues over the last few years, in my opinion.
@tonylam95489 ай бұрын
When I fly, I prefer not to sit within 45 degrees of an engine. It really ruin your day if you have a turbine blade ending up on your lap, after it went through the back of your seat. For the rear of the engines, the wing give another layer of protection.
@amanikarume39008 ай бұрын
GE is my favourite aero engine manufacturer!
@mariododik99447 ай бұрын
Tell the people the truth who is grateful for your America the land of dreams. Japanese and French and other countries that design and manufacture 80% of parts for General Electric. GE is just a name. This is where American success is minimal. All parts are designed and manufactured outside of America. In America, they just fit into one whole.
@paavangoyal9 ай бұрын
Spinny bois
@BStrapper8 ай бұрын
Here is a breakdown of Rolls-Royce's underlying revenue by segment in 2022: Civil Aerospace: £5.7 billion Defense: £3.7 billion Power Systems: £4.3 billion The company's total revenue in 2022 was £13.7 billion CFM's revenue is derived from the sale of engines, spare parts, and maintenance services. The company's largest customers are Airbus and Boeing. Here is a breakdown of CFM's revenue by segment in 2022: Engine Sales: $13.7 billion Spare Parts: $4.0 billion Maintenance Services: $2.3 billion The company's total revenue in 2022 was $20.0 billion. Here is a breakdown of Pratt & Whitney's revenue by segment in 2022: Commercial Engines: $11.6 billion Military Engines: $4.6 billion Aftermarket Services: $1.1 billion The company's total revenue in 2022 was $23.3 billion. That means Rolls Royce is Lagging CFM by a long shot.... and does not rank number 2 and not even number 3 but number four. Another case of British delusion of Grandeur ???? YES I do trap BS.
@gavinbissell88475 ай бұрын
Rr don't do narrow body commercial airplane engines and where are their spare parts/ maintenance numbers?
@Goofy-mi8ly9 ай бұрын
gorborgorbor
@markhill92759 ай бұрын
Best Jet engine Rolls Royce, best car in the world, Rolls Royce. Although the Septic Tanks wail and cry, the Brits beat them! When you say something is the best you say it's the Rolls Royce of.....
@amitmadaan81197 ай бұрын
rolls royace best
@watashiabdul9 ай бұрын
Heii!! Come on, make this KZbin channel for Indonesian, or at least have Indonesian subtitles, I'm from Indonesia, I really like the content of this channel and I've subscribed
@euloge9969 ай бұрын
Brev, do you think they will add Indonesian before languages like french or Spanish +you can even translate the subtitles
@christianvalenzuela2259 ай бұрын
This guy forgett russian engines.... what intention? Its evident, payed by some western country(s)
@Rehunauris7 ай бұрын
They aren't playing in same league. Look at junior teams.
@mariododik99447 ай бұрын
Tell the real truth. These are actually Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, Sumitomo. In the case of Rolls Royce. And Ishikawajima Harima and Safran (Snecma) in the case of General Electric. General Electric and Rolls Royce are just names that sound nice, but someone else is responsible for that success. Your partners will tell you about that. But it should be emphasized that partners account for 80% of the success with which you like to brag that it is exclusively yours, Americans and British.
@rixar1394 ай бұрын
☘ Irish Honey Badger - Richard McGinnis here, attempting to receive my pension from GE to a new account.
@Rasscasse9 ай бұрын
I love simple flying videos. It is rare that I criticise, but the choice of background music which actually is not background music, because it’s competing against the voice level of the narrator is shockingly bad. The choice of music is just naff, like the cheesiest elevator music ever, but cranked up to 11 when the narrator voice level is 7. Seriously, the last 2/3 minutes or so of this, I had difficulty concentrating on what the narrator was saying. It completely ruined the end of the video for me. If it is the producers’ son who got a new keyboard for his birthday in October and he’s desperate to show his talents, I’m sorry, but this is not good enough. I could do better background music for this video myself. And I’m not even a trained musician. Narrator content first class Background music content woeful Background music level must do much better
@mdrubel57277 ай бұрын
USA my dream country. Go ahead
@mariododik99447 ай бұрын
Tell the people the truth who is grateful for your America the land of dreams. Japanese and French and other countries that design and manufacture 80% of parts for General Electric. GE is just a name. This is where American success is minimal. All parts are designed and manufactured outside of America. In America, they just fit into one whole.
@MichaelM-uw3mk9 ай бұрын
I've never heard a more disingenuous "share your thoughts in the comments" than this channel.