Love’s Rejoicing | 1 Corinthians 13:6

Introduction:
Lost man is incurably moralistic.
Even when men are immoral, they promote their immorality in the name of morality.
Using just one example.
When we think about the sexual revolution that our nation has seen over the past few decades -recognize that it has been done in the NAME OF MORALITY.
“It is RIGHT,” they would say, “to celebrate sexual diversity, and if anyone disagrees, IT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE A BIGOT.” In fact, they are driven by irrational fear. Homophobia. Transphobia.
This places the acceptance of all the various sexual sins in the category of virtue.
Those who accept such things are more enlightened, more advanced, more educated, more reasonable, or just better people.
It places the rightful hatred of these behaviors in the category of bigotry.
THOSE WHO ACTUALLY OPPOSE GOD ARE NOW CLAIMED TO BE ON GOD’S SIDE.
THOSE WHO ACTUALLY SIDE WITH GOD’S WORD ARE NOW CLAIMED TO BE AGAINST GOD.
BUT IT ISN’T JUST A GENERAL MORALITY THAT IS CLAIMED FOR THESE CHOICES - IT IS THE SPECIFIC CLAIM OF LOVE.
According to the moral climate of the age:
To say that a person’s sexual orientation is sinful or abnormal is UNLOVING.
To say that people of the same sex shouldn’t be able to marry is UNLOVING.
To refuse to treat such behaviors as normal and acceptable - in the realm of a family, for example - is said to be UNLOVING.
This is a tremendous crisis in our time.
IT DEMONSTRATES HOW THE MEANING OF LOVE, THE MEASURE OF LOVE, AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF WHAT IS LOVELY - HAS BEEN DISTORTED.
The quality of love that we consider tonight IS A GREAT REMEDY if we are willing to listen.
What we see here challenges common lies and deceptions that exist in the MORAL REALM, the RELATIONAL REALM, the DOCTRINAL REALM, and the REALM OF MINISTRY.
What do we see here? We will consider these two statements under THREE headings.
I. LOVE’S DISCERNMENT
These two statements are to be taken together.
Each statement is true on its own, but when taken together we see the fulness of what is being described.
What is being described is that fact that LOVE MAKES A CHOICE.
Love does not exist in the gray zone of neutrality. LOVE IS NOT ACCEPTING OF EVERYTHING.
On one side of the ledger, we are told what is incompatible with love. What love DOES NOT ACCORD WITH what it CANNOT COOPERATE WITH, and what it will not REJOICE IN.
On the other side of the ledger, we are told what LOVE AGREES WITH - what it TAKES JOY IN.
This means that LOVE MAKES DISTINCTIONS. And it makes distinctions that require discernment.
A. LOVE RECOGNIZES UNRIGHTEOUSNESS
For true love, godly love, there is such a thing as sin.
THE WORD HERE SPEAKS OF INJUSTICE, INIQUITY, WRONGDOING, EVIL, AND UNRIGHTEOUSNESS.
That is, anything that is contrary to the will of God in belief or practice.
Anything contrary to God’s will, anything that would grieve the Holy Spirit, anything contrary to the Scriptures, is unrighteousness.
1. UNRIGHTEOUSNESS IN THE REALM OF PHILOSOPHY
The general way that men process the world. The realm of ideas, opinions, ambitions, standards, values, pleasures, theories, morals, etc.
WHAT CHARACTERIZES SIN IN THIS REALM IS THAT IT IS A TRUTH SUPRESSOR.
What is true, according to Scripture, is exchanged for lies.
What would make God truly known is substituted for with lies about God.

[@blessed3516]

I am blessed to have found this message. It is practical and able to open our spiritual eyes and our discernment to the holy things of God.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Amen