True, hard to imagine a cleaner and more controlled landing under those conditions.
9 сағат бұрын
My brother did that with an A7. The mechanic that repaired it didn't like the Tork specs. And after checking figured out that the manual had a miss print and that they were getting installed too tight. causing quite a few A7's to land minus nose gear. Was so often before the mistake was found they had the bottom engine scoop in stock onboard ship.😖
@diggernatorКүн бұрын
I would argue that the Jet Blue landing went perfectly well ....... that crew deserves a beer for sure!
@Toro_Da_CorsaКүн бұрын
That crew deserves a thousand dollar bottle of champaign
@TilldrawnКүн бұрын
who else remembers that video of the JetBlue landing with its gear stuck sideways from back in the day??
@KammandierКүн бұрын
they seem to have an affiliation with nose gear mishaps
@Jeff-sp7bgКүн бұрын
I was on it ....
@briansierzegaКүн бұрын
I remember that rim was ground down perfectly flat halfway down
@nomenclature9373Күн бұрын
Watched it on a live stream when it happened.
@noobyplays7679Күн бұрын
me
@0101-s7vКүн бұрын
2:15 talk about sticking the landing. Good job, given that the runway overrun is into a mountain.
@beelseboobКүн бұрын
The runway overrun is actually off a cliff, and then into a mountain.
@Ha-Youll-Never-Guess-Who-I-AmКүн бұрын
JetBlue has some of the most talented pilots I’ve ever experienced. Props to them on that landing 🧈
@JC130676Күн бұрын
The pilots may be talented but the maintenance staff seems to have an issue with nose gears...
@skylark.krakenКүн бұрын
They also have notoriously bad front landing gear
@YanDaOne_QC10 сағат бұрын
no you didn't
@skylark.kraken10 сағат бұрын
Oh I didn't notice I had been ninja'd
@johngraves6878Күн бұрын
From Nepal to the Bahamas to Antarctica, some really interesting clips you've got there. Neither snow nor ice nor dust nor failing nose gear will keep the pilot from his appointed landings.
@stevelogan5475Күн бұрын
Pilots did an outstanding job on the the 1st scene with the failure of nose gear deployment, I thought they might try to rudder into the grass for less friction , but they really did not need to , again ,outstanding flight skills
@TrailsportingКүн бұрын
Rudder into the grass? That sounds like an awful idea. Imagine if the nose dug into the ground. Then what? You'd be wishing for more friction and less sudden stoppey.
@stevelogan5475Күн бұрын
@@Trailsportingnot with no nose gear friction on pavement could cause a fire and grass won"t
@TrailsportingКүн бұрын
@ Listen, I try not to argue with those who are obviously mentally deficient. It feels wrong. Have a nice day, Mr Science.
@jovanmilosevic249416 сағат бұрын
@@stevelogan5475 You don't know what's in the grass - holes etc. The trucks were already moving to allay any fears of a possible fire.
@Craig-wp3pz12 сағат бұрын
Yeah, that WAS an impressive as hell landing......
@zombieapocalypse3837Күн бұрын
The Landing may have gone Wrong, but that landing went about as right as could be expected, Bravo to the pilots.
@MikeC2K10Күн бұрын
6:38 I've heard that pilots call this low pass before landing "the approach."
@kh40yrКүн бұрын
After the fall of the Soviet Union, two Su 27 flankers made the airshow circut in the states. I Those 2 SU 27's came to the Oregon International Airshow in Hillsboro Or. During takeoff, one of them partially blew out the afterburner during takeoff. He still got Airborne, but the right engine was billowing black smoke. He flew around a bit with his buddy, streaming black smoke. He got back down with a incredibly fast landing, and ate up most of the runway getting stopped.
@DamplyDooКүн бұрын
Wonder if they would ever come back
@craigmclean8260Күн бұрын
Yep, saw them perform at the 1990 Paine Field airshow in Everett...Also, the An-225 flew in and was on static display. They also had three aerobatic aircraft, 2 Su-26Ms, and a Yak-55. The 225 was cavernous, and featured two APUs, 28 main landing gear wheels, and four nosewheels!
@BettyFisher-gy4skКүн бұрын
This video is great! Humble yet proud, a ideal balance.
@EleanorPetersonКүн бұрын
The landing without nose gear will have had Brits who used to watch the 1960s UK TV series 'Thunderbirds' (made by Gerry Anderson) on the edge of their seats shouting, "Fireflash! Overshoot! Overshoot!" [Ref: a famous episode in which a futuristic supersonic jet airliner had to land without any undercarriage. Seriously cool...]
@robertwk24Күн бұрын
Loved that Fireflash !
@tazmod7272Күн бұрын
While in the Navy My dad flew fighters prop and jets. He would say that the guys who did air racing were nuts. I can’t remember what he said about the Navy Blue Angels and Air Force Thunderbirds if anything.
@tallmansfavorites7563Күн бұрын
That 757 landing in Antarctica must have been very cold, you could hear it's wings shivering 😅
@lsx280Күн бұрын
That landing went right!
@RSF-DiscoveryTimeКүн бұрын
00:50 BEAUTIFUL Emer. response.....right place at the right time.
@user-rl3ef4ju9k19 сағат бұрын
Yeah, usually they are a long way away from the point where you would expect to meet the stopped plane.
@stevenv2190Күн бұрын
7:50 - Icelandair - had to check - yep, they fly 757 and even a 767 to the bottom of the world.
@rreiterКүн бұрын
Have to admire those pilots - the white landscape and runway must mess with their depth perception during landing.
@EchoFolfКүн бұрын
6:38 RIP 🌹
@KriftbeastttКүн бұрын
Real
@DamplyDooКүн бұрын
I poured some vodka out in respect
@JordanColeman-r8wКүн бұрын
Does this hurt the airplane?
@TaterCat00Күн бұрын
@@JordanColeman-r8w The only completed AN-225 was destroyed by Russia in the beginning of the invasion
@johndavidson342422 сағат бұрын
@@TaterCat00 Yes, but they do atleast have 1 more sample, the one & only now, although it's not completed since way back.
@ChristopherBurtrawКүн бұрын
Poor JetBlue seems to be particularly prone to nosegear failures
@MeowO_OКүн бұрын
4:13 Definitive proof that Earth is round.
@zyadzanaty6800Күн бұрын
I admit that earth is round But that is a fish eye lens
@dertythegrowerКүн бұрын
@zyadzanaty6800that is a globe, there is no lens that can debunk it is a globe
@dertythegrowerКүн бұрын
@zyadzanaty6800 a globe is a globe, lens does not matter
@RAW-INCREDIBLEMOMENTS28 минут бұрын
Those snow-covered roads are treacherous, but this video captures the reality perfectly. ❄
@TheShowbloxКүн бұрын
JetBlue having yet another nose gear issue: I’VE PLAYED THESE GAMES BEFORE
@Duvstep910Күн бұрын
it's crazy seeing how much you can move the flight controls and the plane hardly moves
@kalamageoКүн бұрын
A lot of that has to do with the size of the ailerons. I flew, among other things, the Beech jet and a challenger 350. The beech jet ONLY had spoilerons. Basically spoilers on the top of the wing that gave a roll input to the plane. The challenger 350 uses small ailerons and large spoilers panels to input roll. The problem is, it take about 45 degrees of input on the yoke to get a reaction from the spoilers. LOTS of yoke input on windy days.
@elwhagen21 сағат бұрын
Amazing landing by the JetBlue crew!
@freibertКүн бұрын
Perfectly done by the Embraer crew, maybe even the aircraft could be safe.
@fionasaunders764627 минут бұрын
Brilliant piloting 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@hisimagenme4 сағат бұрын
Excellent piloting!! Great job!
@ImagineGTAVIКүн бұрын
Looks like there's a delay between input and plane response when flying!😮
@tomgauger949Күн бұрын
Excellent work by the crew.
@YanDaOne_QC10 сағат бұрын
Jetblue pilots: Legends!
@larrybaker5316Күн бұрын
wow, what a remarkable landing, those folks on the flight deck nailed it ! !
@muttwinstead6422Күн бұрын
I'd say it went pretty dam right under the circumstances.
@Hogzsnotzv2Күн бұрын
Nice landing…. Pilot held that nose up at low airspeed, that ain’t easy yall… them fire bio’s are Johnny on the spot too
@asanseil5553Күн бұрын
Wonderful job, pilots. Perfection.
@susanwahl6322Күн бұрын
It’s a good thing that JetBlue has good pilots!
@mikep1176Күн бұрын
The F-15 isues is called a compressor stall
@WhisperJetAmericaКүн бұрын
Great Vlog. Lots of action.
@deansapp4635Күн бұрын
I was on a a US scare flight in the 90s pilot double bounced the plane landing a BWI airport. We had about 100 feet of runway left.
@robertking7269Күн бұрын
Holy flare Batman PIC almost made the turn on the ramp
@StevieWonder737Күн бұрын
Very nicely done
@johnhickman10615 сағат бұрын
The Jet Blue landing without the nose gear was better than the commentary from the camera operator.
@jonnohz1Күн бұрын
great video!! thanks!!
@GRamerDim20 сағат бұрын
"jetblue plane landing goes wrong" that went as right as you'd expect too
@jamesblinzler7421Күн бұрын
Great save. But what is going on in aviation right now with failing landing gear.
@tazmod7272Күн бұрын
We had a coworker who’s husband died many years ago when the fire retardant planet crashed while fighting a forest fire.
@onlyme112Күн бұрын
You could hear the low altitude warning on the video. Those firefighting pilots are extremely brave.
@fluxusdakota6508Күн бұрын
whose
@MazzieMay3 сағат бұрын
I by no means intend to mock your co-worker’s husband. But the typo of ‘planet’ instead of ‘plane’ paints a whole nother picture
@58bigglesКүн бұрын
That landing went perfectly.
@KAlpha09Күн бұрын
4:25 waiting for that '1-2-3, yeah he blinked' video
@LCRAVIAT1ONКүн бұрын
My dad who works for jetBlue named this plane at 0:37
@Rese5167 сағат бұрын
Great job😮
@akrm229010 сағат бұрын
hell of a job by that crew!
@Spyke-lz2hlКүн бұрын
That Southwest proves why more tail strikes happen on landing than takeoff. That’s exactly how it happens.
@MazhypicКүн бұрын
Why is it always the airlines that is based the furthest from Antarctica are landing there. There’s this Iceland air 757 and Also the Norse 787.
@davidbkelly2 сағат бұрын
Very good job.
@Roboseal2Күн бұрын
1:08 Wtf is an afterburner blowout? Did you mean a flameout or compressor stall?
@Craig-wp3pz12 сағат бұрын
3:03 Rolls Royce engineering has left the chat 🏃♂️ 🚪 🔧🛩
@nadeemmustafa6450Күн бұрын
VERY NICE 👍👍👍
@ep2653Күн бұрын
Good stuff 👍🏼👍🏼
@whytebearconceptsКүн бұрын
What is it with JetBlue and nose gear issues? How about it @lucaas, how about a JetBlue Special?
@samkitty589415 сағат бұрын
Great job landing.
@J-ZIMКүн бұрын
@ 4:02 is that the Pacific Air Show in So. Cal?
@nightmareflame101Күн бұрын
"If I had a penny for every time Jet Blue plane had a problem with a nose gear I would have two pennies, which isn´t a lot but it´s weird it had happened twice."
@whyjnot420Күн бұрын
I've always found it somewhat amusing that the navy's Blue Angels are much better known than the air force's Thunderbirds.
@HailHydra27Күн бұрын
I find it amusing that the Thunderbirds are elite pilots with special training to be able to fly like that but with the Blue Angels every carrier pilot has to be able to do that
@RoadTripA1AКүн бұрын
I would argue that landing went right, considering the circumstances.
@soccerguy2433Күн бұрын
first clip is EIGHT (8) years old. While in this case the nose gear did not extend a related nose gear issue has largely been fully address by Airbus. 1) There are two lugs on the upper support of the NLG shock absorber that prevent it from rotating freely in its housing (fig.1). The investigation showed that both lugs had sheared off and this caused the NLG to lose its centered position. BSCU Standard L4.9B was developed with a reduced number of steering movements during the preland tests. The retrofit of this new standard is complete. The Braking & Steering Control Unit (BSCU)standard responsible for the lug failure is no longer in service. 2) It was found that the nosewheels were able to rotate up to 90° because of a hardware failure on the BSCU. The BSCU remained active but it could not be controlled and its outputs became frozen. An updated design was introduced to improve the robustness of the BSCU and to allow a switch-over to the passive BSCU system when the outputs of the active BSCU system become frozen (i.e. switch from BSCU 1 to BSCU 2 or vice versa).
@lemonpastaaaКүн бұрын
what is it with jetblue and nose gears?
@Boss_TanakaКүн бұрын
They have better discounts with embraer when they buy a no nose gear aircraft
@lemonpastaaaКүн бұрын
@@Boss_Tanaka lmao ... it also saves some weight which means less fuel costs lol
@JohnStrange-q8r8 сағат бұрын
Great landing without schnoze gear.
@DrDeuteronКүн бұрын
I had an afterburner blowout after going to 🌮 🔔
@jacobdanielkuiper574411 сағат бұрын
That was the first time passengers were seeing their own plane demise on the entertainments system!
@sj_gamingxКүн бұрын
jetblue has a... let's say history... with the nose gear...
@Eclipse-lw4vf13 сағат бұрын
Dumb question but do those deicers have heaters in them for the person using it or nah? Ik sometimes equipment like that is 50/50 with stuff like thst
@RichardThompson-q4pКүн бұрын
Hi Lucaas, great stuff. Did an Icelandic plane really fly to Antarctica?
@pjotrtje0NLКүн бұрын
Yes. But not non-stop, of course.
@nomenclature9373Күн бұрын
Regular charter service out of Punta Arenas, Chile. Recently most notable for "The Final Experiment" flat earth debunking team. Flight to Union Glacier was the number one tracked flight across the planet, be it spherical, flat, cubed or donut.
@katehobbs20082 сағат бұрын
Perfect nose-up landing
@gcorriveau6864Күн бұрын
Did that A350 bounce? Or did it skip? ;-) ... There is actually a difference - but most folks (even pilots) don't often differentiate. 😁✌🏼
@AimBotVR1710 сағат бұрын
Yo no way! It’s about the fire! 1:44
@artemkrasКүн бұрын
6:38 A low pass? Looks like an approach to me.
@aliciacat2323Күн бұрын
Pilot skill!
11 сағат бұрын
That was a compressor stall, not an "afterburner blowout".
@Themilkmanskid.Күн бұрын
Nope....that's a wheelie!!! 6:15
@grzesislawgamingКүн бұрын
that looked like invisible nose gear fr 💀
@trevormann8221Күн бұрын
Brilliant landing
@BobaPhettamineКүн бұрын
that landing was smooth as butter didn't even see any sparks lol
@Tom-f5q8eКүн бұрын
Maybe they sprayed some foam before.
@Deionburns1145Күн бұрын
Nice video
@eastindiaVКүн бұрын
Those 4 planes look like they used antigravity motors, after moving up to speed, with conventional motors And then, traveled to the edge of space Turned off the antigravity motors, but not the conventional ones, And let gravity have them fall back in the atmosphere, where they kept flying And never stopped
@Paper246Күн бұрын
0:10 The ptsd…
@TacticalMania-xe1xhКүн бұрын
757? Antarctica? what a brother gotta do to go on that flight?
@sarelbester9039Күн бұрын
At 6:40 - Is that the Antonov A225 that was destroyed in Ukraine by Russia?
@zv2461Күн бұрын
Как раз таки уничтоженный Украинцами , Российский десант в Гостомель прилетел на вертолетах - позже аэропорт начали накрывать БМ-21 ГРАД.есть целый репортаж по этому поводу
@officialILikeGT19 сағат бұрын
That JetBlue plane landed like the Air Canada plane 30 or so years ago
@ouroborisКүн бұрын
So was there no nose gear or no nose gear or what? I think there may have been no nose gear.
@DelightLovesMovies17 сағат бұрын
Great pilots.
@autumnwinter3639Күн бұрын
wish the first lady would have kept quiet
@Gdub33Күн бұрын
Since when do 757s land in antarctica?
@nomenclature9373Күн бұрын
Charter services out of Punta Arenas, Chile and other locations. Icelandair provided transport to Union Glacier for the "Final Experiment" flat earth debunking team and before them the Ice Marathon.
@Gdub3313 сағат бұрын
@nomenclature9373 that's bananas. I'm glad the flat earthers proved the round earthers wrong and got to see that big ice shelf holding all the atmosphere in..... .....lol jk. That's probably what they think in their heads though.
@michaelsedov4948Күн бұрын
If I had a nickel for every time JetBlue had a nose gear failure I would have two nickels, which isn't a lot but it's weird it happened twice.
@codymoe49862 сағат бұрын
And if I had a dollar for every time one of you hacks, copy and pasted someone else's comment, I'd be a millionaire...
@Ian-xq4rtКүн бұрын
hat went wrong? perfect landing considering, if anything, camera was all over the place.
@GR-bn3xjКүн бұрын
The camera person on the jet blue could have done a better job. Twice the airplane was not in the shot
@Alexis2andsoOn11 сағат бұрын
Isnt the pilot usually the one sitting in front in a two-seater jet? So, wouldnt it be the perspective of the co-pilot?
@JordanColeman-r8wКүн бұрын
It was the motorcycles fault
@forcedbreathingistyranny696Күн бұрын
RIP AN225
@NubwoAviationКүн бұрын
What a landing
@DamplyDooКүн бұрын
Would you not want to use thrust reversers with no nose gear would it drive the nose down?
@ImpendingJokerКүн бұрын
It would depend on how much runway they had in front of them but, the thrust reversers would drop the nose faster, and the sudden increase in N2 would cause ingestion of debris that would damage the engines further, so they are not always used for gear failure landings.
@DamplyDooКүн бұрын
@ImpendingJoker ah good point, i didn't realize engines with thrust reversers on can get more damage from FOD