Lucy Letby's legal team attempt fresh challenge as evidence was 'unreliable'

[@christopherlloyd98]

Mr. Peter Hitchens - brilliant handling of a typically ‘biased’ Interviewer. Well done, sir !!

[@wendyjones363]

It seems like all the evidence is circumstantial. There is a good chance that she is innocent.

[@Malayalikada]

No

[@HumanimalChannel]

Were you at the trial?

[@HENNAtabasun1990]

@@HumanimalChannel yawn 🥱

[@KingBee24]

@@HumanimalChannel I can smell the BS from here. I didn't have to be at the trial.

[@christopherlloyd98]

Typical ‘ignorant’ interviewer. Attitude. Well said Mr. Hitchens.

[@fredphipps9452]

The interviewer doesn't seem open to why this is such an awful injustice.

[@davestokes3446]

It's his job to challenge. If he lets Hitchens respond, it's not a problem.

[@andrewtaylor5771]

An emotive subject. I agree with you, if there is doubt on the original conviction, review of evidence, and therefore grounds for retrail. However confronting the crime is, a fair trail with all evidence considered and assessed is a must. This is why capital punishment is a bad idea!!!

[@S.Trades]

Because it isn't. She's twice attempted an appeal and both times it was rejected-after analysis by a panel of judges. She's guilty.

[@Malayalikada]

​@S.Trades yes .she is guilty .I don't understand why anyone wants her outside.

[@heathgarrick713]

@S.Trades Dewi evans changes his opinion on 3 of the deaths. Pseudomonas found in the sewerage , Doctor mistake leading to another death…….she’s not guilty

[@markwhite3958]

Good on Peter Hitchens - he has chipped away at this case and helped raise the profile of this major miscarriage of justice! FREE LUCY LETBY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@andreafox7267]

I’ve heard Peter Hitchens speak on this before. He is absolutely correct. Biased, speculative and circumstantial evidence. That’s not enough to put someone away for the rest of their life.

[@ougal84]

4:43 - talk of emotion is exactly where people like this interviewer are getting it wrong. The law doesn’t doesn’t, or rather shouldn’t, deal with emotions. It’s why victims of crimes don’t get to choose the sentences those convicted serve. It seems to me that the vast majority of those wanting this looked at again are not defending Letby so much as the legal process - If someone can be sent to prison without hope of parole on such shaky supposition and shoddy investigation (the staff rota springs to mind) there is nothing to stop this happening to any of us.

[@KingBee24]

Exactly. The reason I'm following this case is not just because of this one nurse. The whole Criminal Justice System is under scrutiny !

[@pg-ne4bt]

She was stictched up good and proper. Scary thing is if Dewi Evans hadnt been so gobby and used air down naso gastric tube then this miscarriage may have stood. It will fall.

[@S.Trades]

Ok, we'll see....

[@ncooper8438]

Some very senior and highly paid officials in the CJS and the Nhs and Westminster could be seriously embarrassed if the LL case was reopened, and lesser figures too such as police officers and doctors. Therefore there will be enormous reluctance to reopen the case, so the responsible officials in the CCRC will delay as much as possible to give the incompetent accusers a chance to retire or emigrate.

[@ShowalterdontlikeME]

That has proved to be the case many times in the past.

[@m39403]

No one saw her do anything! The prosecution made a case solely built on circumstantial claims, most of which have now been torn apart since the trial. The reasons given to prosecute where based on the weight of the sum of these individual circumstances. It is clear today that the sum of these individual circumstances doesn’t stack up! Therefore the probabilities of innocence far out way the probabilities of guilt.

[@KantrimasZukauskas]

When you are poor your trial will be unfair... To hire good and private solicitor you have to have £500000

[@christopherlloyd98]

Stitched up is putting it mildly. Corrupt and REPUTATIONAL System masquerading as Fair and Impartial ??

[@amberwild-ms4co]

@@m39403 baby e's mother saw her doing something, and she later saw her changing her story several times and then claiming she couldn't remember anything

[@BrianWillcox-qp2hr]

It needs proper investigation. Any doubts on her guilt must be addressed thoroughly & without prejudice.

[@andrewtaylor5771]

Agree, and I would add, no matter how emotive the crime is. Fair justice is an absolute, not a desire or if it doesn't suit society.

[@S.Trades]

There are no reasonable doubts. This has been scrutinised by judges when she (twice) attempted to appeal. As well as the original jury (x2). Her behaviour in court speaks volumes.

[@S.Trades]

And a 10 month trial wasn't long enough?

[@BrianWillcox-qp2hr]

@S.Trades Doesn't matter how long the trial is . A miscarriage of justice has no time limit.

[@S.Trades]

​​@@BrianWillcox-qp2hrthis was no moj. She's been held to account.

[@DavidISHERWOOD-iu1xn]

There is NO EVIDENCE POLICE ATTEMPT TO COVER £10 MILLION COST

[@BevVale-q3x]

Truth will out.

[@Malayalikada]

Truth is out and she did it on any day.

[@Deadbeat-k1l]

Start investigating the consultants, I really think she was set up.

[@fredphipps9452]

Totally agree; this fact is as clear as daylight

[@jimparlett4099]

@@Deadbeat-k1l The doctors were the ones who raised the whole question of why so many babies who were expected to live were dying. If a group of 4 or 5 doctors were murdering babies and nobody was paying any attention, why on earth would they start raising the issue with hospital management? You clearly haven't thought this through - blaming the whistle-blowers is just dumb.

[@watnamecaniuseforfs]

​@@jimparlett4099 They only ever wanted Lucy off the unit....they felt uncomfortable working with her.

[@watnamecaniuseforfs]

​@@jimparlett4099 The whistleblowers charity think something off about their behaviour....it's in the news.

[@goatnibblez]

​@@watnamecaniuseforfsI wonder why her in particular, and not any of the other nurses?

[@angelaheeley5547]

This case hasn't been concluded beyond reasonable doubt. Many reasonable people have a lot of doubt.

[@eddy66t6]

That's not how courts work. It doesn't matter that "reasonable people" have doubts. It matters that the jury didn't have a reasonable doubt she was guilty.

[@Celticcross688]

Knowing the way the NHS treats & blames people..I doubt this case has been concluded by reason doubt, understanding many things as former Staff Nurse 1977-2009..No trust in the Medics in this case..Too many cover ups..the lessor qualified always get the brunt and used as a whipping boy.

[@sitruchtims9392]

many idiots

[@peanutbutterbruv]

​@@eddy66t6The already flimsy evidence has been discredited. If there is no credible evidence there is no case. If there is no case against her why is she in prison?

[@idakev]

​@@peanutbutterbruv Which evidence was discredited after the trial?

[@Bungle-UK]

You can smell the stitch up.

[@HENNAtabasun1990]

Lucy Letby is a victim of one of the worst miscarriage of justice in the UK. She was deliberately scapegoated by Not fit to practice Drs poor practices resulting in the deaths of babies. It's about time that them in power except responsible for their mistakes and release this young INNOCENT nurse.

[@user-et7zg8cm6l]

Except she did say to a colleague "I cant wait for my first child to die".

[@goatnibblez]

Scapegoated for what exactly?

[@heathgarrick713]

@@goatnibbleznhs failings Doctor mistakes,etc

[@Dontstandinthepark]

@@heathgarrick713why don’t you just say “stuff’

[@Malayalikada]

Seriously .You wouldn't want a baby killer in the hospitals.The world has gone mad.

[@trevorchap21]

How does the presenter know all the parents were happy with the verdicts?

[@treefrog1956]

I have no idea who this 'presenter' is but he's totally clueless.

[@christopherlloyd98]

Why is it that certain ‘know - it -all media Interviewers’ demonstrate their ignorance all the time ?

[@carmenmiranda3280]

Something never seemed right about this case well said Mr Hitchens

[@user-fu9dd5vc6x]

It's amazing how people totally ignorant of the facts decide those who were aware are wrong.

[@KantrimasZukauskas]

This is not really matter is she guilty or not. What matters the most is the evidence presented. Is there a reasonable doubt ? Yes / appeal !!!

[@RockHunter-v7j]

It has to be new compelling evidence- she’s already had two trials at a huge cost to the taxpayer. You don’t just get more because you might win the next one

[@claredavidson8701]

Yes money that would have been better spent on giving the parents rightful compensation for the deaths of their babies most likely at the hands of inexperienced junior doctors, incompetent and absent consultants and filthy, chaotic conditions on the ward instead of two unnecessary trials and an inert Inquiry. There is an FOI that shows the hospital has paid out a total of £42 million in claims in obstetrics (including neonatology) since 2007 so over nearly 20 years the hospital has been making mistakes at these levels of specialty. I am afraid we will be digging further into our pockets for the horrendous MOJ when Lucy gets her own compensation when she is exonerated. None of this should ever of happened in the first place but as a country we are fast becoming experts in getting it wrong time and time again so what if she's had two or twenty two goes at appeal. Look at Malkinson and Sally Clark. Their appeals were continualy being thrown out. It's about getting it right whatever the cost.

[@RockHunter-v7j]

@@claredavidson8701 how much have all the other U.K. hospitals paid out in compensation ? Obviously for context you’d need to show that COC was significantly worse than the others. The payouts look like £2m a year, in compensation terms that’s tiny - a single lifetime care settlement would be that on its own ? Like everything you wrote, its poorly understood

[@hoolydooly5799]

Fully concur. I am a retired Medical Scientist from Australia and I have followed this from the start and appalled she was even charged ! The police originally had doubts as charges were made and dropped twice prior! When accusations of serious crime are made it is SOP to look into the accusers as well as accused, and how the event came about, but obviously that process was not done satisfactorily. The Judiciary are supposed to ENSURE JUSTICE not bury their heads in the sand when facts become inconvenient.

[@RockHunter-v7j]

@ how do you know they didn’t investigate the accusers??is a medical scientist what you become if you’re not smart enough to get a medicine degree ? You’re not a doctor or lawyer, don’t pretend you are

[@KeithFoad]

She, like anybody else, deserves a retrial. Or is this another case of wrongful convictions of an innocent woman who is going to spend the rest of her natural life locked away and then years down the line find out she is innocent like so many unsafe convictions that other inocent people who have suffred unsafe convictions in the past.

[@caribbeanman]

Lucy Letby is innocent! Naive yes, but innocent!

[@Malayalikada]

Not naive or innocent.A cold psychopath

[@user-fu9dd5vc6x]

How in Gods name do you know? Stop reading trash newspapers

[@KantrimasZukauskas]

The jury is a bunch of idiots that attends court caring an Asda bag. The point is that they need trials to make the state lawful. The trials itself are unlawful. However, that poor individual will not understand all violations made there....

[@davestokes3446]

They are not necessarily idiots, just ill informed.

[@RockHunter-v7j]

@@davestokes3446 if being ill informed was a crime, the Letby cult would be in jail with her

[@amberwild-ms4co]

Or maybe they know a lot more about the case than any of us do?

[@KantrimasZukauskas]

@@amberwild-ms4co This had to be disclosed in the court as not circumstantial evidences.

[@amberwild-ms4co]

@@KantrimasZukauskas sorry I don't understand what you're saying, what evidence are you referring to?

[@mrobo9037]

I wish this lady the very best of LUCK, i dont believe she is GUILTY !

[@ASDwnt]

An exemplar of an interviewer utterly ignorant of the subject 🤮

[@caribbeanman]

SOMEONE START A PETITION TO FREE LUCY LETBY!!!

[@halfbakedproductions7887]

I won't comment on whether or not she's guilty, but the trial itself seemed less than ideal for a variety of reasons.

[@turquoiseblue228]

4:37 I am not appalled!!!

[@dlyon9673]

The contention that circumstantial evidence is not "objective evidence" is utter nonsense.

[@KingBee24]

Circumstantial evidence such as DMA, fingerprints, blood ... but all we have in this case is the 'gut feeling' and 'opinion' of an old doctor ...

[@user-fu9dd5vc6x]

This argument could apply to EVERY monster in prison... 'give them another trial... waste loads of money on them and if they DID commit the crime (which the overwhelming evidence suggests they did) and they are again found guilty, then no harm done' EH????

[@PhoenixRising-nm1he]

No it couldn't. Most trials are sound. Most convictions are demonstrably correct. In this case there is no actual evidence of her involvement in the deaths of the children. All evidence is circumstantial. A simple desire to see someone pay for the crime, if indeed there was one, is just not good enough.

[@rolandhawken6628]

all trials are different ,usually there is a motive ,there was no motive in this case .usually there is a witness of wrong doing ,again no witness , in fact the case against her was all hypothesis with no evidence to back it up The only real reason to convict might be on the evidence of the expert witness ,but now more experts are saying his evidence was false . I mean are you really happy to lock some one up for life on this basis ?

[@michellelaw839]

For the CCRC to look at this, they’ll need to have pretty strong evidence on the application. She won’t get special treatment. There’s a process.

[@Malayalikada]

​@@PhoenixRising-nm1he she did it .Whoever thinks that she is innocent is her enabling parents.

[@KingBee24]

Factually incorrect. I've gone thru every serial killer for the past 60 years. Nobody was saying that Ian Brady didn't do it, Fred West, Denis Nilson, Peter Sutcliffe etc etc etc

[@S.Trades]

She WAS properly convicted-after a 10 month trial! She has twice been denied (by a panel of judges), permission to appeal. She's guilty.

[@treefrog1956]

Then why have a great many medical and statistical experts cast huge doubts on the evidence? LL's defence team were incompetent and LL should have to spend the rest of her life in prison because of that.

[@brianberry1869]

Hope I never apear I court with you on the jury

[@Lornsyjp]

I’m not decided, but i am an ICU nurse and I read the evidence of this case. The circumstances are that a doctor decided several different causes of death were as a result of one nurse working on the same day. Also, air into a nasogastric tube doesn’t normally cause a cardiac arrest. It might be that the doctor was scapegoating the nurse. It wouldn’t be the first time that has ever happened. Also, I worked in a paediatric ICU before, where the water supply had aspergillosis in the water. The staff were washing nebulisers under the tap after they used them and so they saw an increase in hospital required pneumonia in the ICU. Just worth thinking about. Obviously hard to say, but every avenue needs to be investigated. How many experts did her defense team use? How many experts are come forward in her defense now.

[@vincentblack7467]

The NHS PIN IT ON A WHITE WOMAN, ENOUGH SAID...!!!

[@brianberry1869]

So leave her to rot in jail then do you really think everyone behind bars is guilty

[@brucepink5859]

If this evodence was unreliable why did she not call experts to dispute it,rather than a hospital maintenance man

[@S.Trades]

Any witnesses called by the defence could also be questioned by the prosecution. She's guilty. She's going nowhere.

[@ShowalterdontlikeME]

Sewerage explains most of the deaths - it was spurting out like a fountain from the wash hand basin one quite a number of occasions - sewerage in hospitals is far more dangerous than normal sewerage because it might contain dangerous infections and endanger patients in a vulnerable condition - Isn't that right S.Trades?

[@Hrld-25]

@@ShowalterdontlikeME Funny how nobody else noticed this "fountain" of sewage.

[@ShowalterdontlikeME]

@Hrld-25 All in the ward did at the time, and so did the plumber It just goes to show how little the witch hunters know about the case

[@Hrld-25]

@@ShowalterdontlikeME No, I'm afraid the ignorance is all on the side of those perpetuating this ridiculous myth. None of the other staff mentioned it, not the ward manager nor the doctors, nor the parents. The plumber mentioned the problem with a sink but it seemed to be nothing extraordinary . Had it been as dramatic as you say, there would have been a crisis.

[@willowtree9291]

Can't help thinking that the parents won't want it all dragged up again.😢

[@unusualaquariumecosystems5805]

I'm pretty sure they don't have to get involved. Even if she harmed babies, she wouldn't have done it in front of the parents.

[@rachelevans6711]

It's more important that the parents have genuine and real justice for their loss.

[@unusualaquariumecosystems5805]

@ And if she's innocent?

[@goatnibblez]

​@unusualaquariumecosystems5805 They do have to get involved, because some of the evidence used to convict Lucy was from the parents themselves which Lucy lied about in court.

[@idi0tdetectioninprogress]

Parents don't get a say in the matter. Its Letby vs the Crown.

[@Swansong321]

IF you've got strong evidence take it to court..stop all the showboating sensationalist press briefings!🙄..she's guilty..those poor babies and their families

[@itwasntme8770]

You seem to have no concept of UK legal procedure or rules of evidence. Like a lot of people you appear to arrive at conclusions not based on evidential facts but rather based on emotion.

[@ShowalterdontlikeME]

History has shown that Witch Hunts are very difficult to stop in a court of law because that's where they happen

[@Malayalikada]

Yes she is guilty.

[@ExplorewithSarahlouise]

What about this poor woman if she’s got to spend her whole life in jail if she’s innocent?

[@Malayalikada]

@@ExplorewithSarahlouise Two times appeal got rejected .I feel sad for those babies and their parents

[@charlottefox1105]

Maybe Hitchens should listen to all the court transcripts, I doubt he has

[@KingBee24]

So, where can we listen to the court transcripts ? FFS don't say 'Crime Scene 2 Courtroom' ! !

[@amberwild-ms4co]

Circumstantial evidence is evidence, people forget that when it suits. 1 or 2 things in isolation probably won't mean much but when they are all put together they can add up to enough to convince 2 juries of a person's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. You can question whether the proper process was followed but it is a huge leap from there to insisting she is innocent. Remember there are grieving familiar at the heart of this, many of them witnesses themselves

[@ShowalterdontlikeME]

The prosecution gave the game away when they called the case Circumstantial - It's only Circumstantial with the presumption of guilt - Given the presumption of innocence the case is coincidental - a nurse in a hospital is not much of a coincidence PS The Lucy Letby case proves beyond a shadow of doubt that it is the easiest thing in the world to bamboozle a jury - that is why its important to have a prima facea case from the start.

[@amberwild-ms4co]

@ShowalterdontlikeME if that was the case why didn't they convict her on all the charges?

[@ShowalterdontlikeME]

@@amberwild-ms4co Nine out of ten ain't bad - and stop giving thumbs up to your own comments

[@amberwild-ms4co]

@@ShowalterdontlikeME that's doesn't mean anything, the only reason I can think of to not argue against a point you disagree with is that you don't have an argument.... no liking my own comments here, that's a weird and desperate claim

[@ShowalterdontlikeME]

@@amberwild-ms4co Well now you no how the falsely accused.feel - I presumed your guilt on "The Thumbs Up" charge, and you have no defence The Crown's arguement in the Lucy Letby Trial was coincidental, not circumstantial

[@oOoR1CH1EoOo]

I keep hearing there’s no evidence but she literally had hand written notes confessing that she done it. She even admitted those hand written notes were done by her

[@magstowens]

It wasn't a confession

[@organiccarla325]

The notes were not a confession. They were the ramblings of a young woman in extreme distress because doctors were persecuting her.

[@alanbeaumont4848]

She was told by a therapist to do so.

[@ruthbashford3176]

Lucy wrote THEY WENT I did this, I killed them on purpose...etc. It was reported speech. Lucy was writing about what she believed others thought about her. She did explain this to the police. Why would Lucy confess to murdering babies that had died of natural causes?

[@oOoR1CH1EoOo]

@@magstowens saying ‘I did this, i killed them, I am evil’ sounds pretty damning if you ask me

[@D1Snr]

This is insane. Ive never saw such sympathy for someone so evil. I have a good idea why a certain element are trying to get her out of prison.

[@peanutbutterbruv]

Probably because the evidence against her has been discredited. If there is no evidence there is no case. If there is no case, how tf is she evil?

[@AsphaltAntelope]

The true evil are woke people like you who want a potentially innocent woman to rot in prison whilst the real cause of the deaths of those babies goes undiscovered. You lot don't care about the lives of the babies, you just want to lock up a boogie monster so you can feel good. Disgusting.

[@Bystander-xd2wj]

I suppose you are still hating on the Post Office victims.

[@idakev]

​@@peanutbutterbruv If the evidence was re-examined and she lost again, you'd very likely just continue saying the same thing. Even Letby accepted that the babies had extremely high levels of insulin for some unknown reason. She just denied that she did it. The challenge against that evidence has been weak.

[@peanutbutterbruv]

@idakev No, if the evidence is reexamined and she is shown to be clearly guilty I'd accept her guilt. If the evidence was reexamined and she was shown to not be guilty would you accept that?

[@thebonkser]

I hope there is a retrial. If scribbling all over post-it notes in a cathartic episode the words : “I am evil I did this,” “I killed them on purpose because I am not good enough to care for them and I am a horrible evil person,” and “hate.” isn't objective evidence I don't know what is.

[@Simchen]

You will be surprised that it was reported speech. She wrote about what others said about her. She also wrote "I am innocent", "Why me?" on the same notes. It is also understood that she wrote it on the advice of a counselor to deal with the accusations. So yes it's objective evidence that she was distressed about the accusations.

[@RockHunter-v7j]

@@Simchenall the usual pro Letby myths coming out again

[@Simchen]

@ What exactly is the myth? The note is online for all to see and read.

[@RockHunter-v7j]

@@Simchen the myth that the psychologists made her write it and then used it against her. It was scribbles in her own notebook

[@Simchen]

@ I have not claimed that "psychologists made her write it and then used it against her" That is an absurd strawman. What I am saying is: There is a totally benign and plausible explanation why she wrote it.

[@JohnHolmes-h9v]

Let's be honest if this girl wasn't pretty he would have absolutely no third leg to stand on to defend his actions

[@connorwood8527]

Too many assumptions

[@markwhite3958]

Childish!

[@DavidISHERWOOD-iu1xn]

Whatever the facts or people involved - the idea of having 22 charges and 10 month trial for jury to judge is BONKERS

[@Swansong321]

All the sad cases defending her look the same

[@S.Trades]

She's a troll. Nothing without her makeup.

[@هناءعبدالله-س1ط]

By God, I only wrote this appeal out of hunger. Have mercy on us may God have mercy on you appeal only out of hunger and poverty 😭😢😭😢😢I asked you, by God, to save us before we die of extreme hunger. I asked you to enter. on God. On you, I am facing you, I am your sister, I beg you, I beg you, save us for the love of GodGod is my witness, my brother, that from morning until now we are forbidden My mother, my brothers, and I lessons and tears. We are in a situation that only God knows God is sufficient for us, and He is the best disposer of affairs for those who broughtOh people, we are your sisters, by God 😭😭😭 We do not even find a loaf of bread inside the house that would satisfy People are brothers. Oh God, make your righteous servants subservient to u. ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' Oh God, make your righteous servants subservient to us. My appeal to every Muslim, oh Lord, if he sees this message, may He prolong his life, make him happy, and cover him. May God reward him. God is sufficient for me, and He is the best disposer of affairs. There is no power or strength except with God. Oh people, oh nation of Muhammad, oh people of goodness, oh people of mercy. We are your sisters and your children. By God, we do not even find a loaf of bread inside the house that would satisfy you. Oh nation of Muhammad, I only spoke out of extreme hunger and distress. My mother, sisters, and I are displaced from our homes because of the war. We are in a state that no one knows about except God. God is sufficient for us, and He is the best disposer of affairs, against those who brought us to this state 💔💔 By God Almighty, I only wrote this appeal out of extreme poverty and poverty, oh people. I beg you by God Almighty, Lord of the Mighty Throne, that I do not have food at home. By God, my brothers and sisters have been sitting around for two days. Without food, by God our situation is very difficult, we are 6 people in the house and my father passed away and there is no one to support us and we live in a rented house and we cannot pay the rest of the rent. I am not lying to you nor deceiving you nor cheating you. I am a Yemeni girl displaced because of the war between me and my family over a rent dispute and the owner of the house. By God, my brother comes every day and humiliates us and talks about us and wants us to go out to the street because we are unable to pay him the rent. The neighbors saw us crying and talked to the neighbors again and gave us a deadline until the end of the week and we swore to God to let us out of the street now we are in arrears of 60 thousand Yemeni riyals for 3 months rent may God have mercy on us our country is suffering because of this war and we do not find our daily sustenance and we live my mother and sisters our father passed away may God have mercy on him and we do not have anyone in the world to come to us in these harsh circumstances my little sisters went out to the street and saw the neighbors eating and stood at their door giving them even a piece of bread and by God in whose hand is the heavens and the earth they closed the door and kicked them out and they came back crying dying of hunger no one has mercy on them and now the holiday has come back to me if no one of us helps us with a kilo of flour by God we will die of hunger brother I seek refuge in God and then in you and I want your help for the sake of God I ask you by God you love goodness and help me even if it is about the rent of the house send me a WhatsApp message on this number 00967713342392 and ask for my card name and send it and do not delay may God compensate you with all good My little sisters, look at their situation and help us and save us before they throw us out into the street and humiliate us or my family and I die of hunger. We ask you by God, if you are able to help us, do not delay on us, and may God reward you with good√÷¶\¶^^÷ππ•π√√π_^^\\¶¶¶¶¶^

[@SonnnieStuartrt]

Watching this video for the tenth time and still don't understand how they do it. My attempts end in disaster👅