my brain gets stronger after watching every single time. thanks Gerald
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Ha. Awesome! Cheers. 😃
@TrailFeatures5 жыл бұрын
I found this video very enlightening.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
WORDPLAY! 😜
@maminparvaresh5 жыл бұрын
Man oh man, this is complicated. English is my second language, and I don't even understand the explanation in my first language, but this video was genuinely helpful, there were areas that I didn't understand to the fullest extent, but I have certainly learned a lot. Thank you.
@josecolon81435 жыл бұрын
Why? WHYYYYYYYY don’t you have at least 100k subscribers??? Another great educational video!! Bravíssimo 👏👏👏👏👏🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Julio! Very much appreciated. 😃🙏
@SimpLeeBeth5 жыл бұрын
Sharing is caring, Julio!
@timbeaton50455 жыл бұрын
yep. I agree. Just this channel and Mr. Judd's channel have taught me a great deal. But Mr. Undone's theoretical explanations are just the best. At least that i know of!
@Photographicelements5 жыл бұрын
Well... start sharing these videos like crazy, he'll get there.
@ruwangifernando92705 жыл бұрын
I agree with you 10000 present
@toxictabasco5 жыл бұрын
It was very helpful. Thanks for the comprehensive to the point info. Nobody undoes it like you.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, mate! Appreciated as always. 😀🙏
@Jacob_Roberts5 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Gerald. You are the first KZbinr who explains what these terms mean. Everyone else uses the terms, but doesn't explain what they mean.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Cheers, Jacob! Thanks. 😃🙏
@TheSmeagol6305 жыл бұрын
Gerald did a great job! And not to divert from his glory; Filmmaker IQ did a video on exposure that goes over those terms quite in depth. Requires a few views before it sinks in.
@Jacob_Roberts5 жыл бұрын
@@TheSmeagol630 Thanks for letting me know. I'll watch that video a couple of times.
@Jacob_Roberts5 жыл бұрын
@@TheSmeagol630 I went to your page but I couldn't find a section for your videos. I also couldn't find your video dealing with these terms. What is the name of the video so that I can search for it?
@TheSmeagol6305 жыл бұрын
@@Jacob_Roberts Not me, man. I'm no KZbinr. I mentioned Filmmaker IQ did a good video titled "The Science of Exposure". I'm pretty embarrassed you had to see the old school work on my garbage channel...
@pranamsk5 жыл бұрын
Get this guy 100k++ by the end of year
@lukasgrafbern5 жыл бұрын
You're killing it lately Gerald! I'm subscribed to quite a few photography channels, but this is the one that gets me excited when I realize a new video is out. 🎉
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Lukas! That's really nice to hear. Cheers! 😃🙏
@GeraldBertramPhotography5 жыл бұрын
When I was 9 I asked my science teacher why the sky was blue. My 9 year old eyes began to glaze over as he proceeded to say how blue light waves have a short wavelength which causes this colour to get caught in the sky as it collided with particles and gases in particular Nitrogen which makes up 78% of the earth's atmosphere and that technically the sky is dominated by wavelengths between 400 nanometers (violet) and 450 nanometers (blue) and when mixed together, our eyes are only able to see the dominant colour: blue. Watching your video I kind of felt like I was 9 again.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Ha! I love this comment. I'm happy to have brought you back to 9. Also +1 for the sky explanation. 👍😃
@paulk89245 жыл бұрын
Every LED panel sold on B&H, Adorama, Amazon etc should have a link back to this video. Great job explaining this Gerald.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Paul! That's very kind.
@PeteC625 жыл бұрын
I think I might need to watch this two or three more times... Love the outtakes too!
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Peter! Cheers. 😃👍
@ErikHill14 жыл бұрын
I’m in the market for video lights and this was the third video result on Google. 🙌 my search was ‘are lumens the same as lux’. Keep up the good work!
@zfarahx5 жыл бұрын
Great job explaining concepts that can get tricky sometimes. Thanks a LOT
@julianray5 жыл бұрын
Anyone who includes the phrases 'pedantic physicists' and 'licks and nuts' in the same video has got my vote. Gerald you ROCK! Thanks for shedding some lumens (or is is nits? -I'm so confused) on one of the marketing games in the video/still world.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Hahaha. Thanks, mate. My pleasure. Thanks for the funny comments. 😃🙏
@Ildskalli5 жыл бұрын
Beautiful video, but something was missing (for me) - some real-world applications. Maybe you could do a follow-up video comparing two different LED panels, or a panel against a light bulb? It always helps me immensely to grasp difficult subjects when there are realistic examples properly explained along the technical bits. Thank you anyway for the great material :)
@saadazzahrani5 жыл бұрын
Love your videos man, and also I love the physics behind this and your way of 'undoing' the physics easily. Looking forward for your next videos.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for saying that. Looking forward to more of your comments as well. Cheers! 😃👍
@panh1412985 жыл бұрын
Holy crap dude I was just looking up the difference between the three trying to calibrate my monitor brightness using the light sensor on my phone. You rock!
@peepers47635 жыл бұрын
GU, another note of appreciation for the time and impressive research you put into you productions. Your clean editing is also noted🧐
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! Appreciate you taking the time.
@pammikewilliams30265 жыл бұрын
Holy crap, Gerald. You have exceeded your exceeding nedriness again today.
@pammikewilliams30265 жыл бұрын
I mean excessive neediness. My head hurts.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Haha. Perfect! 😜
@benharris39495 жыл бұрын
Just as I’m looking to buy panels, this comes out. Not going to lie, I’ll need to watch it a few times to keep up though!
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
I'm glad it's timely. Appreciate the comment. 😃👍
@SamLucas265 жыл бұрын
Dude, love the scientific analyses of your videos like this. You’re awesome at explaining things. And really bring clarity to subjects like this. I went to school for petroleum engineering and now I produce videos and so I love finding balance between creativity and technicality because my brain has that intersection 👌 keep crushing it.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Sam. Thanks for the kind words and for sharing a bit about yourself. Glad you're diggin' the videos. Cheers! 😃👍
@SamLucas265 жыл бұрын
Sure thing man! Really loving your stuff since I found your channel. Thanks for putting your stuff out there 👊
@qt314155 жыл бұрын
WAZZAAAAAP HOMEY~ the best in terms of technical KZbin right here.
@qt314155 жыл бұрын
I think you changed something on the middle part of your background.. a new light?
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Yeah, I turned on an RGB LED for fun since I was talking about light. I kinda liked it though. Might leave it up and change the colour from time to time.
@oren.kirschenbaum5 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I wanted to know - thanks Gerald!
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Glad to hear it. Thanks for commenting. 😃👍
@miroslavnenchev11795 жыл бұрын
I will re-watch this video several times :) Very useful information but my brain needs time to process it all :) Could you make a video explaining the different focus systems in the lenses?
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
I touched on that topic a little in my AF Systems video. Did you happen to see that one? kzbin.info/www/bejne/r5Ktd4J-lMygfa8
@lucafogliati605011 күн бұрын
Great job man!Alll concept are well explained thank you!
@FilipedeBarrosDance2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting! Thanks for sharing Gerald!
@StorylineMedia5 жыл бұрын
Really appreciate your content -- always factual and accurate. On a side note, Foot Candles (as opposed to Lux) was bog standard on Spectra light meters used for decades for cinematography, at least in the US and Canada. Newer digital models can measure/read out in either.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words and the fun fact! Cheers. 😃👍
@warpiwarpi35334 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining luminance!
@ranvierion5 жыл бұрын
Good and clear concise explanation. Thank you~
@victorfilm_5 жыл бұрын
I was expecting your "What's happening, everybody!" trademark. This video’s not the same without it 😜 Great topic btw.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I've been playing around and letting people pick the greeting. It's been fun so so far. 😃
@PhiTonics4 жыл бұрын
Ah dude, thank you for this, really helpful.
@pebmets5 жыл бұрын
Great Job. Very useful information. The graphics really help the concepts.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Phil. I'm glad to hear that as they took me a bit of time. 😃
@BeanDar3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for getting to the point
@town35 жыл бұрын
All I can say is I need some smarter friends lmbo. Great work Gerald
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Haha. Thanks, Michael! 😃
@satan30905 жыл бұрын
This video was illuminating
@Asdun774 жыл бұрын
thank you , you make it simple.
@brynocerouss5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video! On an unrelated note, on my way into work this morning I was thinking about bitrates and had a question that I feel like you would know the answer to (using my Lumix G9 as an example): The recording options with the highest quality are 150mb/s at 60p or 100mb/s at 30p. It seems like the 60p would be higher quality because of the higher bitrate, but wouldn't the 30p actually be better (since there is more than half the bitrate for exactly half the frame rate, giving more bits to each frame)? Or is that now how video works at all. That's probably splitting hairs as the difference would be nearly imperceptible. (in quality, not in appearance as 30p vs. 60p is apparent)
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
You have the right idea, yeah. It depends on the camera, but often the lower framerate is cleaner because it can spend the bits better. In the case of the G9 you might have a hard time telling a difference, but in some cameras it's more obvious.
@genkiboy832 жыл бұрын
very clear!! thank you for your video
@PeterMKent5 жыл бұрын
I like this video, it's full of nits and wit :D
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
And one nitwit, but I'm not saying who... 😜
@StirfriedGerman5 жыл бұрын
Haha, lux your nits ...😊 Great video, thanks !
@PaulKretz5 жыл бұрын
I won't stop until I hear *'What Is hAppenin' (boom)!"*
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Hahaha. This must be killing you, Paul. 😜
@showdaKOs5 жыл бұрын
@@geraldundone I must ask : 'What Is hAppenin' ??? I mean I know, but we all miss it (I've been here for only 2 or 3 months but I feel like an old member of the club), even if we like the new intros. Keep it kool.
@helmutschwarz19895 жыл бұрын
Hi Gerald, I'm a big fan ov your explanations, including this one, On another topic - after many years of shooting video (currently I use a Sony a7R3 plus Ninja V) I am still struggling with the various log settings and how to manage them . Slog 1, Slog 2, Cine 2, Gamut - you name it. Maybe I'm too stupid for this but maybe you could explain that and how to work with it in practical live would be great. Greetings from Austria and I look forward your next one.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words, Helmut. Good suggestion also. I'll definitely look into that and add it to the list. 😃👍
@Rebelpatriot3875 жыл бұрын
Great video. What I want to know is how much the lux is received on the earths surface by the Sun in general? On the clearest of days of course and equatorially as opposed to polarly.
@TatvamProductions5 жыл бұрын
Hi Gerald, I am planning on buying either the Aputure MW or the Litra Pro. They both claim that they are the brightest in the market for the small form LEDs. Can you please let me know which one is brighter? Thanks.
@marijngoossens8095 жыл бұрын
thanks man, really helped me a lot
@GabrielAyoroa3 жыл бұрын
Dude, you're amazing
@nenolima55955 жыл бұрын
How u messure you backlight.. so great light and colors
@imbsysop4 жыл бұрын
Hi, I have been searching a lot about Lumen Lux relationships in terms of grow lights. Your video is the best approach I found this far but I still have a problem with the Lux concept in all these videos. Lux is defined as Lumen per square meter so can you elaborate on your views about the led device you show at 3'20 delivering 1500Lux@1 meter? Is this 1500 Lux over a surface that equals the light source? So what is the intrinsic Lumen emission of that device? (BTW saw some other photography related videos by you especially on color spaces IIRC)
@jlawr44273 жыл бұрын
I use an on camera flash with a guide number of 190. I'm considering using an on camera LED panel that outputs 4,500 Lux (at one meter) in a burst of light, just like a flash. Which one will be brighter at one meter? At three meters? Is there a conversion formula? Thanx.
@myplanetearth88313 жыл бұрын
Nice information 😍❤️💞💕
@leemurai5 жыл бұрын
Need to watch this at least four times to catch everything...first round all I retained was lick nuts. LOL.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Hahaha. Then my work here is done. 😂😜
@lisafaireymusic5 жыл бұрын
Cool thanks! Am needing this content! Sent by Indrepreneur! Cheers! 🦋💗🧚🏼♂️
@elishaisabelle17655 жыл бұрын
Sosososososososososososo Helpful! Thankyou!
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome! Thanks for the comment. 😃👍
@groovymotion57065 жыл бұрын
Gerald shed some light on the subject! 😂
@SteveMayedaTV5 жыл бұрын
Man how do you know all this stuff!?!?! Right when I’m looking for a monitor. This whole time I thought ‘nits’ were in your hair
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Haha. Thanks, Steve! Those are definitely not the nits you want. 😜
@raghuvasam4 жыл бұрын
Just Awesome👌
@msanand72 жыл бұрын
Hello buddy!! Thanks a lot for the video. Could you help me understand how 1500 lm at 0.5 m is calculated to 2400 lux @ 4:17 for wider angle and 1500 lm at 0.5 for narrower angle 12000 lux. Could you or someone please help.
@adityaratra72904 жыл бұрын
NUTSHELL : AWESOME. PERIOD.
@kittytwister90112 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!
@windwardatom85784 жыл бұрын
In Nits how low can an iPhone get vs what we already know is it can exceed 1200(HDR) on the latest model. Nothing like this exists yet please find out.
@Nivenization5 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@TheGeoDaddy5 жыл бұрын
Still a little fizzy on why LEDs are still not useful for Stage illumination than Tungsten - because the LEDs can’t “throw” as far as Tungsten - but LEDs are good for video/filming because the lights are kept in closet proximity... other than it works! Which is important for me because the Theatre space I am going to shoot in has a very limited electrical capacity and the existing tungstens are just about IT! So I am keeping them for the backdrop/sets... but bringing in my 3 Point Lighting kits (two Intellytechs L-160s and one Aputure D3000 for key) and have to run them ALL on battery power. Haven’t set things up yet, but I’m assuming I’ll be able to keep two different lights sources in balance as everything will be shot at 5600K.
@The_0ne5045 жыл бұрын
GOT DAMMIT GERALD!!!! We talked about this last week. It's "What is HAAAAppening everybody?!?!?"
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Haha. I know, I know... maybe next week. 😜
@paolonervi22084 жыл бұрын
super useful
@LucaOliviero5 жыл бұрын
Very interesting! By the way, totally off topic question. What free LUT do you recommend for GH5 Cine D footage?
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Luca. I don't really use many LUTs with CineD. Paul Leeming has a good one, but it's not free. But for creative LUTs, I haven't really experimented that much with what's out there.
@motechhd5 жыл бұрын
That's a brilliant educational video, I had fun watching it, I just have a little question, I know you use Aputure H672s as your key light with an umbrella to diffuse the light, do you think it's the better option compare the Falcon eyes RX-18T which is a flexible LED mate? as it's a larger source of light or the light power that comes from H672s compensate for that after diffusion? Thanks in advance for your answer, it would help me a lot in my channel as my lights are very bad and allover the place :( keep up the good work :)
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
For what I do the Aputure is plenty powerful enough, even after diffusion. I'm not a huge fan of flexible LEDs because I don't like the diffusion options as much. I always end up bouncing them. Falcon Eyes also has their Sophiez series which are pre-diffused. The SO-48 or 68 would be big enough for a key I bet.
@motechhd5 жыл бұрын
@@geraldundone Thanks for the quick response, the problem is with my budget as well as I can get the Aputure light cheaper than the Faclon Eyes by like 100 Euros, so do think it's enough to my key light and use it for Tech reviews maybe with a little help of a smaller light like Aputure F7? Thanks again
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Yes, absolutely. I'm only using mine at 30% power.
@veggiet20094 жыл бұрын
I wish you'd use "Watt" similar to the way that lightbulbs use Watt. The term being "Watt equivalence" which could be more accurately called "Incandescent Equivalent" or "How bright is this compared to the average incadescent bulb rated at a certain wattage. Why this would be useful is that I learned doing photography / videography with 500 watt bulbs, when I went digital I learned that I could get away with using 200 watt incandescent, even though now I go to the store looking at the Lumens value each bulb maintains, I still do tend to fall back on the "Watt Equivalent" rating. It would be nice to know what the "Watt Equivalent" would be for some of these other technologies, and LED panel displays.
@finnillson48085 жыл бұрын
This was a lot of luxing information.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
😃😂🙏
@hamzalag20062 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Zakna5 жыл бұрын
OMG HES CRAZY . QUIT LICKS AND NUTS
@nightryder215 жыл бұрын
OMG for the sake of all the kittens in the world, bring back the original greeting.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
If I'm hearing you right, you want me to use a kitten in the next greeting? 😜
@ahmedtajbir2 жыл бұрын
How much lux is ideal for product photography
@shamnarinepersaud19424 жыл бұрын
What is the s in lighting eg 30s
@gregsullivan74082 жыл бұрын
There's one thing I don't quite understand: why the Nit is Cd/m2. A Candela is essentially a measure of power per unit area (a Steridian is essentially a measure of area, afterall). So it doesn't make sense to me to say "power per unit area, per unit area". Do they really mean that the Nit is "the amount of power in 1 Steridian worth of a light source, that is emitting at X Candelas intensity, per square metre"? That's not the same thing as "Candelas per square metre".
@timbeaton50455 жыл бұрын
@ 3:49 Illuminated confirmed!
@plaidklaus34074 жыл бұрын
I love the information in this video and your explanations, but it's hard to focus on the information with those gap cuts. I know it's a style of web tutorial videos to remove all empty space, but leave a bit more space for the viewer's mind to process the load of information that you just dropped. Just a suggestion. Obviously, do what works for you, but I just wanted to give some feedback. Overall, excellent video, I'll be following more from your channel!
@veggiet20094 жыл бұрын
So if I have a 3,000 NIT Led display, how many Lumens does it have? if I place it 6 feet behind a subject, how much light maximum could I expect it to project onto that person?
@davidhrzenjak2 жыл бұрын
I think that depends on the size of the display. Because lets say you have 2 displays at 3000 nits they will have the same percieved brightness but will illuminate the subject twice as bright than only one display.
@napalmhardcore5 жыл бұрын
Why do some of your videos have what looks like screen tearing but vertical? Edit: My bad, some bug with my computer/display drivers.
@PostColorGear5 жыл бұрын
Hey!!! I'm a pedantic physicist!!
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
I mean, I didn't want to name names... 😜
@Enrique-the-photographer5 жыл бұрын
💡👍
@kaistudio82294 жыл бұрын
you light my brain
@catnamestaken5 жыл бұрын
Cool
@mattlappinen50293 ай бұрын
That's nice to know, but I am not a math wizard. How about getting this into a guide number that I can understand as a photographer? Please keep it simple.
@benzinfilms87615 жыл бұрын
what's happening ??!! i miss that "what's happening" thing :D
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
I'm sure it will make an appearance soon. 😋
@Photographicelements5 жыл бұрын
The Flux Capacitor.
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
How much power would something like that take to run? It would probably be measured in gigawatts...🤓
@Photographicelements5 жыл бұрын
@@geraldundone Mr Fusion.
@ruwangifernando92705 жыл бұрын
I Subscribe and I am sure you are fit to get a diamond playbotten
@hassanhashmi47154 жыл бұрын
gr8
@__donez__5 жыл бұрын
0:36 "If there are any pedantic physicists out there..." Thanks for the warning.
@bitTorrenter3 жыл бұрын
So, the correct order is Lumens - Lux - Nits
@aboalhassenahmed72703 жыл бұрын
😂🖤
@imiy5 жыл бұрын
Very nice channel picture of Elon Musk
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Haha. You think I look like Elon Musk? 😜
@imiy5 жыл бұрын
@@geraldundone at least on your channel avatar. Or maybe he looks like you :)
@stans52705 жыл бұрын
IF, Randy Johnson measures light, is he a Lumen, Lux, or a Nit?
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
Haha. The pitcher?
@stans52705 жыл бұрын
@@geraldundone Yep - nicknamed "The Unit"
@underdog_factor4 жыл бұрын
GIVE ME YOUR BRAINNNNNNN
@LegionOfWeirdos2 жыл бұрын
"Candela" sounds like a stripper's name.
@timbeaton50455 жыл бұрын
@ 0:39 Pedantic Physicist just got her ass handed to her. Or him! 😎
@ikestrom5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Fun and informative watch as always. For a slightly more formal and math-heavy explanation, John P. Hess from Filmmaker IQ covered this here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y3Ork4xvpZl1nas
@geraldundone5 жыл бұрын
That's interesting. I hadn't seen that video before yet I'm subscribed to FIlmmaker IQ. There are some very close similarities between our videos in that segment. I kinda feel bad now. I guess mine will stand as the "lite" version. 🤔 Thanks for sharing and for the kind words.
@ikestrom5 жыл бұрын
@@geraldundone No need to feel bad at all! Your "lite" version is a welcome addition to the lighting & exposure KZbin canon :) Keep up the great work!
@NavarroOne4 жыл бұрын
Way too much info crammed in there, very confusing