Major Evidence of a New Particle Called Glueball: Here's Why It Matters

[@TheGreyLineMatters]

Lol, "I'm not a particle physicist, but I play one on TV".

[@alecity4877]

Who? Where? Is Anton an actor? I need to know and check it out.

[@KaiseruSoze]

Best line from Stargate: He's a Jafa. Jack: No. But he plays one on TV.

[@jimnpen8451]

Quiet AI..​@@alecity4877

[@LingBaneHydra]

Solid credentials!!!

[@baomao7243]

@@LingBaneHydraWord

[@acleedsunited]

Even as a long term subscriber, I thought that was arguably your best video. You spoke slightly slower than usual (please take this comment constructively) and the visuals you used were superb. You explained the topic really well so it can be understood by people without high level science backgrounds. Thank you Anton.

[@Wispertile]

Agreed! His videos are getting better and better!

[@Mingbaakmei]

If you have a video with a somewhat garbled audio, i.e. too fast to comprehend, then go to the video's Setting and click on Playback Speed and reduce the speed from 'Normal' to '0.75' and lo the audio becomes acceptable.

[@szamszatan]

@@Mingbaakmei exactly, and quit bitching

[@herrpez]

I play at 1.5x playback speed and have zero issues hearing what he's saying.

[@AlkisGD]

@@herrpez - I've always struggled with the accent due to the effect it has on his enunciation. 1.5x is impressive!

[@DerekR87]

The fact that the building blocks of all things are held together by stuff that pops "in and out of exsistence" is hard to wrap your head around

[@ianmoore5502]

To my undergrad, amateur hobbyist understanding, all the stuff is "there" in a field we can't observe, and what we observe as "particles popping into and out of existence" is just the fluctuations within that field. Am I on the right track?

[@EdwinSteiner]

@@ianmoore5502 The way you said it is at least much better than "popping in and out of existence", which is an often-used but very misleading way of popularizing the effects of virtual particles and comes from people misunderstanding the use and meaning of Feynman diagrams. The key concept is that fields have "quantum fluctuations", which is just jargon for quantum uncertainty: If you have a state of known energy, for example the vacuum, or a single proton, etc., the values of the fields, including the gluon field, are necessarily *unknown* due to quantum uncertainty. If one wants to understand the properties of such a state based on a description of the fields, one needs to account for all *possible* field configurations according to the rules of quantum mechanics. Technically, this is very difficult but there exist methods to systematically get approximate (and sometimes extremely accurate) results, for example perturbative field theory which uses Feynman diagrams to organize these calculations. "Virtual particles" are patterns in these Feynman diagrams that have to do with how the unknown field configurations in the vacuum, i.e. the "vacuum fluctuations", affect things. There is nothing "popping in and out of existence", which would imply an observable process.

[@shanxmonappa870]

Think of it as multiple overlapping waves. They usually cancel out each other so you can't observe the peaks and valleys. Once in a while they are out of phase and you can physically see a wave.

[@EdwinSteiner]

@ianmoore5502 The way you said it is at least much better than "popping in and out of existence", which is an often-used but very misleading way of popularizing the effects of virtual particles and comes from people misunderstanding the use and meaning of Feynman diagrams. The key concept is that fields have "quantum fluctuations", which is just jargon for quantum uncertainty: If you have a state of known energy, for example the vacuum, or a single proton, etc., the values of the fields, including the gluon field, are necessarily unknown due to quantum uncertainty. If one wants to understand the properties of such a state based on a description of the fields, one needs to account for all possible field configurations according to the rules of quantum mechanics. Technically, this is very difficult but there exist methods to systematically get approximate (and sometimes extremely accurate) results, for example perturbative field theory which uses Feynman diagrams to organize these calculations. "Virtual particles" are patterns in these Feynman diagrams that have to do with how the unknown field configurations in the vacuum, i.e. the "vacuum fluctuations", affect things. There is nothing "popping in and out of existence", which would imply an observable process.

[@sergiomendoza4244]

They are just making this shit up . Zero proof it exist just like a black hole . This is just theories and speculation. They are missing half of the equation by design . They have to invent “dark matter” to make their model work . Imagine a model so bad that you have to include 96% of “dark matter “to make it work! That’s so laughable

[@wolfgangkranek376]

I knew it, the universe is held together with glue and duct tape.

[@keirfarnum6811]

Probably CA glue. And if “100 mile an hour tape” works on Bush planes, I don’t see why the universe couldn’t benefit from its powerful properties. In fact, that may be what the mysterious “42” was referencing; 42 meters of duct tape is all that keeps the universe from splitting apart. 😁

[@spencerhardy8667]

Don't forget the WD40.

[@Wispertile]

Hahahaha!

[@drunemeton]

Duct tape is like The Force! It has a light side, a Dark side, and (as we just saw) it holds the universe together.

[@aniksamiurrahman6365]

It's duck tape all the way down.

[@gaius_enceladus]

There's a funny quote by Enrico Fermi when a student asked him the name of a particular particle - "Young man, if I could remember the names of these particles, I would have been a botanist." - Enrico Fermi - From "A Short History of Nearly Everything" - Bill Bryson.

[@Maximillian-00]

😂

[@Elias_Avraham]

What happened to the Gluon that couldn't interact with the Higgs-Field? It got Glueballs.

[@nastybadger-tn4kl]

They change story every other day ... keep the fund coming. All of them are basically CONMAN who know the con game. That is find new particle every other day.

[@LilB0pete]

@@nastybadger-tn4klbro we knew that these were at least hypothetically possible in the early 80s. It’s not really a brand new concept, just newly proven.

[@farmergiles1065]

Or it formed a Bose Condensate.

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

​@@nastybadger-tn4klOh, boy wait until you find about the budget of the US military...

[@trippyliquids]

LOL

[@worldlinezero4783]

BABE WAKE UP NEW PARTICLE JUST DROPPED

[@trashjash]

We making it out of the cosmic primordial wave soup with this one 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@Deletirium]

😂 I hate when they release all the singles ahead of the album. Now when the Theory Of Everything finally releases, it'll be boring.

[@spencerhardy8667]

New particle free with every monthly copy of "Cosmos". Collect them all!

[@8888Rik]

This and the replies are freaking funny as hell.

[@nishyanthkumar]

actual physics

[@gildardorivasvalles6368]

One minor observacion: lattice QCD is from the 1980s, but the calculations back then were very crude, and took months, or even years of compute time in supercomputers of that decade. It finally started making better progress when computers became powerful enough in the 2000s. By now, after close to four decades, some calculations of lattice QCD can be done on powerful enough desktop machines, and fairly precise ones are done on modern supercomputers and computer clusters. They are still very difficult calculations, as lattice QCD is an approximation of full QCD, and these need to be done by varying parameters to try to extrapolate to full QCD values.

[@ika5666]

Do you know what is the current consensus about the value of the expected "mass gap" in the spectrum of pure SU3 yang-mills? Is it the mass of 0++ glueball or rather a pion rest mass, or something else?

[@gildardorivasvalles6368]

@@ika5666 It's been a while since I read anything on lattice QCD (I am more knowledgeable in theoretical condensed matter), so I am not familiar with recent results --- I don't know if the mass gap has been accurately determined. I would have to look up on the recent literature on the subject --- maybe the value is more firmly determined by now. I remember many years ago one of my former professors gave us a paper with some of the calculations he'd contributed to, in which the mass spectra of several hadrons had been computed and, though close to experimental values, the calculated results didn't quite agree yet with those, but they were better than results from previous years. That's an interesting question you've posed. Are you also a physicist?

[@ika5666]

@@gildardorivasvalles6368 I m but I cannot find the (consensus) clear answer in the literature.

[@PierreLucSex]

Can you run Minecraft

[@andrewbreding593]

That visualization was art and science collaborating in a very visible and useful way

[@owenlaprath4135]

I totally love the way you explain bizarre things in a simple way! You are a truly great teacher!

[@jimmyzhao2673]

3:14 Love the name 'Charmonium'

[@bluenetmarketing]

"Computronium is a material hypothesized by Norman Margolus and Tommaso Toffoli of MIT in 1991 to be used as "programmable matter", a substrate for computer modeling of virtually any real object."

[@TheArtfulCorvidae]

Is that because the two particles are in a Charmonious relationship?

[@Chill_Mode_JD]

Hello wonderful particle

[@peterd9698]

Im disturbed by that image at 1:42 of the atomic nucleus being a tiny little three legged creature flopping its limbs around in an agitated state while slowly, helplessly, spinning and probably screaming something like "AHHHH! WHY AM I HERE! WHATS GOING ONNN!" I think I will go back to imagining red and blue ping pong balls, for my peace of mind.

[@olic7266]

A hydrogen nucleus, yes

[@markmcd2780]

I had similar thought, that the quarks are flailing around trying to get out of their 'strong force' field prison.

[@GaussianEntity]

​@@markmcd2780 Really puts the "glue" in "gluon" lol

[@TheNeptunianGamer]

tbh, it looks like an alien creature and it's 😬

[@eagleotto2527]

If the hitchhikers guide has any basis in reality, the screaming particles saying "AHH WHY AM I HERE, WHAT IS GOING ON?" sounds plausible

[@MyraSeavy]

This stuff is so far above me! I figure something is soaking up in my brain! And I enjoy your humor and I find your everything so intriguing! 😊

[@christopherlococo2483]

Agreed, but much of what he talks about actually sinks in.

[@Etimespace]

It is assumed that more and more space-dispersing energy is pushed inside the space-expanding quarks, so that all the expanding quarks that circulate the space-dispersed energy are exactly the same. Their density and volume in relation to each other can be changed when their speed is accelerated in particle accelerators. When moving in groups, they experience the change in a different way, according to which of them pushes forward and which of them pushes in the background of the first one or the first ones. That is, they encounter expanding energy pushing against them, which affects them differently according to the order in which they encounter the energy pushing against them. And it affects how they recycle this energy that is scattered in space. Naturally, energy also plays a big role, which accelerates their pace. That too changes the density and volume of quarks expanding in space. The speed of internal movement / time. Internal pressure. Well, when the expanding nuclei are collided, it’s no wonder that in the collisions, energy is dispersed/expanded into space in such a way that physicists interpret from this information that there are different quarks in the nuclei. And yes, the density and volume of quarks expanding during collisions are different. Even so much different that one of the quarks is so dense and small compared to the others that no information is obtained from it in collisions. I understand that some parties assume that protons and neutrons are made up of zillions of separate quarks. Well, here’s another time. Nowadays it is taught that protons and neutrons consist of three quarks that are different from each other. The three quarks form a kite, as it were. In my opinion, four would form a much more logical and stable entity. The pyramid. Tetrahedron. Ok, when the expanding quarks are at rest relative to us, they would already be much more congested regions of expanding energy with the same density and volume Of course, their density and volume live somewhat all the time. While the situation lives on all the time, they come to control each other’s density and volume while circulating with all other expanding quarks this space-dispersing energy of which they themselves are composed. So that it completely changes over time. When someone momentarily expands a little faster than others, its ability to absorb the space-dispersing energy pushing through itself into itself is worse due to the fact that its density is lower than that of expanding quarks with a smaller volume at that moment. Of course, more energy dispersing into space pushes through it, because it is bigger at that moment. The situation will recover as the recycling of energy dispersed into space continues. The ability to recycle energy that dissipates into space is faster because its internal movement / time is faster at that moment. It seems strange that no one before me has been able to consider that perhaps the so-called the atom is completely different from what physicists have assumed. Perhaps the volume of matter is also relative. Perhaps it is the case that time is not only relative. Maybe here we have the key to the theory of everything in physics🙂 Love ❤️

[@jimmymorrison8314]

You are possibly the chosen one. 👌❤️

[@Etimespace]

Expanding Space is Naked Emperor.

[@Alex-js5lg]

Keep watching, learning, and listening. You'll start hearing the same information from multiple different places, and that's when it'll sink in and start to click.

[@jimmyzhao2673]

Anton is indeed a wonderful person.

[@Elias_Avraham]

I like that they went with Glueball instead of Bluons.

[@jimmyzhao2673]

I wanted Spaceballs.

[@Elias_Avraham]

@@jimmyzhao2673 That's all we'd need, a Druish princess.

[@0LT4R]

@Elias_Avraham That's funny - she doesn't look Druish 😁

[@MattCayen]

Ballons Edit: I just realized that being french, it's only kinda funny cause saying ballon with an English twist sounds funny 😶‍🌫️

[@bardsamok9221]

Was originally blueballs so count yourself lucky.

[@marksuplinskas3474]

Thanks!

[@Etimespace]

There are objects outside the visible universe that are so massive that they emit energy that has the character of expanding galaxies which born from centre to outside. The center of these objects is under extreme pressure at all times. Extremely fast energy pushes towards them. Remnants of galaxies that have expanded into space. Millions of billions of years of energy that moved through space and was dispersed into space. It collides with the extremely dense energy pushing away from these objects at extremely high speed and causes this extremely dense energy to explode / expand into less dense energy. The speed of the energy dispersed in space for millions of billions of years has accelerated for millions of billions of years and therefore collides with extremely dense energy at an extremely fast speed. The speed of this extremely fast energy begins to slow down and eventually stops in an area of extreme pressure. This extreme pressure compresses the energy that was once scattered in space for millions of billions of years into extremely dense energy. Pushing away from the center of an extremely dense and massive object starts once again when more millions of billions of years of space-dispersed energy pushes into the center of that object, which displaces the energy that was previously pushed into the center of that object away from the center of that object. In the infinite 3D universe, there is an eternal recycling going on, which does not need pulling forces at all to maintain. google: Savorinen Jukka Read How Universe Really Works ❤️ It is assumed that more and more space-dispersing energy is pushed inside the space-expanding quarks, so that all the expanding quarks that circulate the space-dispersed energy are exactly the same. Their density and volume in relation to each other can be changed when their speed is accelerated in particle accelerators. When moving in groups, they experience the change in a different way, according to which of them pushes forward and which of them pushes in the background of the first one or the first ones. That is, they encounter expanding energy pushing against them, which affects them differently according to the order in which they encounter the energy pushing against them. And it affects how they recycle this energy that is scattered in space. Naturally, energy also plays a big role, which accelerates their pace. That too changes the density and volume of quarks expanding in space. The speed of internal movement / time. Internal pressure. Well, when the expanding nuclei are collided, it’s no wonder that in the collisions, energy is dispersed/expanded into space in such a way that physicists interpret from this information that there are different quarks in the nuclei. And yes, the density and volume of quarks expanding during collisions are different. Even so much different that one of the quarks is so dense and small compared to the others that no information is obtained from it in collisions. I understand that some parties assume that protons and neutrons are made up of zillions of separate quarks. Well, here’s another time. Nowadays it is taught that protons and neutrons consist of three quarks that are different from each other. The three quarks form a kite, as it were. In my opinion, four would form a much more logical and stable entity. The pyramid. Tetrahedron. Ok, when the expanding quarks are at rest relative to us, they would already be much more congested regions of expanding energy with the same density and volume Of course, their density and volume live somewhat all the time. While the situation lives on all the time, they come to control each other’s density and volume while circulating with all other expanding quarks this space-dispersing energy of which they themselves are composed. So that it completely changes over time. When someone momentarily expands a little faster than others, its ability to absorb the space-dispersing energy pushing through itself into itself is worse due to the fact that its density is lower than that of expanding quarks with a smaller volume at that moment. Of course, more energy dispersing into space pushes through it, because it is bigger at that moment. The situation will recover as the recycling of energy dispersed into space continues. The ability to recycle energy that dissipates into space is faster because its internal movement / time is faster at that moment. It seems strange that no one before me has been able to consider that perhaps the so-called the atom is completely different from what physicists have assumed. Perhaps the volume of matter is also relative. Perhaps it is the case that time is not only relative. Maybe here we have the key to the theory of everything in physics🙂 Love ❤️

[@Etimespace]

Are there any electrons around the nuclei at all❤️ The atomic model has had time to be modified into a different form even before❤️ Sometimes was theory that the electrons go around the nucleus, etc❤️ Nowadays, there is talk of electron curtains around the nuclei, etc.?❤️ I assume that there is nothing around the cores. In the cores, there would be congestion areas of❤️ expanding energy that would circulate energy scattered in space with all other similar congestion❤️ areas, and at the same time these congestion areas of expanding energy would automatically❤️ push each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand. Thus, it can be stated that the nuclei of atoms expand and circulate the expanding dark energy❤️ as zillions of separate expanding condensations whose expansion can be accelerated so fast by the❤️ expanding photon, they do not have time push each other away from each other as fast as they expand❤️ At this stage, a new registrable electron is created/combined from the expanding dark energy❤️ pushing away from the expanding core, which still consists of energy which expanding❤️ Physicists therefore think that they can remove electrons that already exist around the nuclei,❤️ although possibly they can create completely new electrons❤️ In my opinion, physicists should consider this point of view❤️ What makes this view very interesting is that stars would be born on the same principle from❤️ zillions of expanding condensations of dark matter, which would constantly be pushed out❤️ of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies❤️ Expanding galaxies would have been formed in space in the early days of the expanding❤️ visible universe when two expanding supermassive objects passed close to each other❤️ The separate expanding concentrations of dark matter would have pushed through each other❤️ again and again and that would have caused them to expand so fast that they wouldn’t have had❤️ time to push each other away from each other as fast as they expand❤️ At this point, they would have started to coalesce into new expanding stars❤️ Perhaps with the James Webb telescope it will be observed that stars were born❤️ as if from nothing. But of course not really out of nowhere, you know❤️ The Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies would have been born❤️ in their own 3D big bangs on the same principle❤️ So that the expanding galaxies would be large particles that convey information from the object,❤️ which is quite massive and dense because it radiates energy that has the character of galaxies❤️ Naturally, we wouldn’t be able to detect the object we are moving away from❤️ Galaxies would then be particles that transmit information about it❤️ ❤️

[@Jeewanu216]

​@@Etimespace Blabbing nonsense won't convince antone

[@marvinreimer2073]

Give him more if he learns not to talk so scratchy and with a clear tone

[@chicojcf]

Great work Anton, the graphics are exceptional.

[@Wispertile]

Your videos bring me so much joy! Thank you Anton!

[@RoryJamesFord-rn9yu]

At then end of each video you pull off the most enthusiastic smile, and, at first I just thought you were quirky. But now, I wait till the end because, every single time you do it, it is so contagious, it never ceases to force a grin out of me no matter what my mood. Thanks!

[@XenXenOfficial]

Oh sh*!!! I remember reading about glueballs being theorized WAAAAYYY back when i was in my teens reading about theoretical subatomic particles 😅🤣 it's SO cool that they're actually being proven real!

[@jimcurtis9052]

Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. ✌️😎

[@andrewreynolds912]

Never heard of these until now

[@MacUser2-il2cx]

And here i thought it was named after that new hit song generated by AI about gluing balls. lol

[@Ezekiel903]

first publication started in March about this ongoing BESIII-Experiments

[@mickit7978]

I Frickin love this guy! Thanks Anton for keeping us in the "know"

[@manofsan]

Yesterday: Strange, Charmed Today: Glueball

[@Deletirium]

For every 2 teen dramas on the WB, you need to throw in an Adam Sandler film.

[@jdlech]

I resemble that remark!

[@bjdefilippo447]

@@jdlech Me as well. Back in the day, at a Caltech Senior Ditch Day, I was playing the part of a gluon in a atom, moving around, along with the other particles. Given that I was the only female in the atom, though, I'm pretty glad they hadn't discovered gluons back then!

[@chrisbyers6084]

Glueball---These guys are hilarious!

[@MassToOrbit]

Awesome video, thanks for the effort!

[@zadianvwhgaming]

can't wait for my kids to say "we learned about glueballs today"

[@zarroth]

hope you're homeschooling then. Modern schools don't teach reality these days.

[@2nd-place]

@@zarroththat’s not true at all. We need to stop with this narrative. My daughter told me about glueballs last week and she attends public school. It is much better to have your child learning in a diverse environment where many different people who specialize in different areas of study are able to educate them, and you can educate them as well the other 128 hours of the week! Then they get a double education. This is what I do.

[@locrianphantom3547]

@@2nd-placeYeah, what kind of glue balls? The ones in this video, or just a bunch of kids making balls of glue?

[@cameronyeager7482]

@@zarrothDo you ever find it concerning that your mind jumps to such negative thoughts? Like do you live in that headspace?

[@attackoramic8361]

​@cameronyeager7482 Most people just think being negative is a more realistic mindset, an extremely toxic mindset.

[@tvwrectoss7724]

I love the pun in the title - "Here's why it 'matters'" xP Clever guy!! Love the video, can't wait for the next one friend!

[@curtismenzies428]

Thanks for the update Anton.

[@Uberwenis]

Thanks, as always, for all the great content Anton

[@WhoNeedsRogaine]

"Here is why it MATTERS." Good one Anton !

[@BFDT-4]

I don't know very much about this, but just as in the scene in Amadeus where Salieri looks at the partitura of Mozart and can instantly hear the music in his head (until Mozart rips it away!), particle physicists can do the same thing with their math and visualizations. I am not envious, but I quietly applaud those kinds of abilities! Bravo!

[@DonVigaDeFierro]

Musicians learn to play first before learning to read partitures. Only after they know what each note sounds like, they can hear the music in their minds. In fact, many great musicians never learned "formal" theory. Math and physics are taught the other way around: If it were music, you'll learn about modular chords and counterpoint, and you'll be scribbling partitures (with the note stems pointing the _correct_ way) long before you ever touch a piano... And that's if you ever decide to dedicate your career to music... Actual music would be reserved to the "college graduates" and the "researchers," because of course there's no way that common people ever find music beatiful and interesting if it's just scribbling notes on paper. No wonder why many people hate math and think they'll never be good at it. But the truth is, equations, numbers, greek letters and the long S are as representative of actual math as partitures are of actual music. Physics is easier to understand, because people see it every day and it's not as difficult to imagine. Carl Sagan, Anton Petrov, Kyle Hill and many other people are making an invaluable service, not only for showing us the music, but for encouraging us to _listen_ to it. Equations and models are simple tools like partitures... The real music, the real physics, the real beauty is in the things they represent.

[@user-gv4cx7vz8t]

@@DonVigaDeFierroYes, it is hard to undo the miseducation in science and convince even teachers that the map (or the math) is not the territory. Any symbolic representation or abstraction should be taught after exposure to the original thing itself that is the basis for the mystery and wonder of the universe.

[@rodbottomley4514]

Glueball. As if this stuff wasn't complicated enough. Great Channel.

[@wippo42]

​@@Etimespace bro wat r u smoking

[@jameshall1300]

​@@wippo42 been wondering that myself

[@ARNFL13]

I am reading Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" currently and on the chapter dealing with particle physics; it is definitely a lot more confusing than typical astronomy . I am recently back in college and pursuing an astrophysics degree, I love your videos, please keep them coming! Very interesting, helpful, informative, and well put together.

[@paulmicks7097]

Thank you Anton, great topic

[@flake8382]

I am loving the investigations into the proton character family as well as neutrinos. Great time to be alive in particle physics. Lots of unanswered questions and new discoveries all the time.

[@BoycottChinaa]

My parents always shouted, "stop smoking glueballs" when I tried to enter the house, now I finally understand what they meant

[@JohnSmith-fl6qd]

Love your name😅

[@Deletirium]

Smoking glue is horribly unhealthy. That's why God gave us paper bags. Natural. Healthy. American. Amirite?

[@generalmarkmilleyisbenedic8895]

CCP is one the biggest threats to humanity

[@JB52520]

@@JohnSmith-fl6qd I don't. It states no reason, only promoting meaningless economic destruction and provocation. That channel exists to create support for the dumbest war we'll ever start. We will not survive if your friend succeeds.

[@smugmode]

​@@DeletiriumWhat about mouthwash?

[@user-pu1rn5it4q]

I am studying physics in my final year, and I am going into the research group that discovered four top production at CERN. It's weird that I hadn't heard from this yet (haven't heard the researchers in the group discuss this), because indeed, if everything checks out, this is a great door opening to BSM physics. Definitely something I'll bring up and definitely something which will be discussed thoroughly! Thank you for bringing my attention to this.

[@Alex-js5lg]

I got kicked out of grade four science class for hitting another kid with a glueball. Little did they know that I was actually practicing particle physics.

[@wolfgangkranek376]

They cheated you out of your nobel prize.

[@keirfarnum6811]

You were way ahead of your time! Working on your PhD at that age! 😁

[@TheNeptunianGamer]

@@wolfgangkranek376 The next albert einstein, truly

[@Algonqiun]

Thank you Anton, without you, I'd have very little credible amount of information on these subjects as you do a excellent job of summarizing these topics.

[@mechanismguy]

Wild! I remember my dad was looking for glueballs in the 90’s at Brookhaven Lab, and had a cartoon glueball on his office door. I just found his paper from 97: EVIDENCE FOR J PC = 1

[@global_nomad.]

love the way you deal with complexity..."too much for this video", "we dont need to go into this, just know its there"

[@sideeggunnecessary]

I'm not a particle physicist but I did stay at a Holiday inn Express last night

[@jeffreysokal7264]

Thanks, Anton! Very interesting movement ahead in understanding particle physics. Just amazing we can predict and confirm such tiny and fleeting occurrences.

[@codeninja1832]

Next, they'll find Spaceballs

[@Elias_Avraham]

"We ain't found sh*t!"

[@iscariot90]

"Oh shit. There goes the planet..."

[@chocopappy]

But will she flip the switch?

[@darkleome5409]

Out of order? Fuck. Even in the future nothing works.

[@MurDocInc]

Cosmic bubbles?

[@stefanomonni9392]

Thank you Anton, you made me understand a bit of this very complicated stuff.

[@jimgraham6722]

Quantum chromo dynamics needs a paint ball.

[@Flesh_Wizard]

I'm huffing glue and chroming, am I qualified to be a particle physicist?

[@gabrielqitsualik6885]

You don't actually need to say quantum when referring to chromo dynamics

[@JenniferChapin-li9eu]

I am learning to love science again thanks to your show. You are an exceptional teacher. Thank you.

[@PeterS-r4o]

Another week - another particle.

[@ridethecurve55]

And this one acts like a shadowboxing neuron.

[@ianmoore5502]

Hes very shy, prefers hotter climates​, and performs free or charge! Just here for a good time. @ridethecurve55

[@HolyMith]

@@ianmoore5502 Underrated comment. Also, it's not a new particle, it was predicted years ago.

[@simonplace5164]

@8:30 so the prediction was significantly off the experiment, but after getting the result then redoing the 'prediction', it wasn't. FYI that's not actually what prediction is, despite time symmetry.

[@camoTiaras]

Good to see Anton's videos being advertised on Microsoft Bing, that's quite an endorsement. ,👋👋👋

[@BoycottChinaa]

Ped O' traytore to humanity ? Hmm I don't know if its worth much

[@camoTiaras]

@@BoycottChinaa I am not fan of Microsoft, but Anton deserves some recognition, I think .

[@BoycottChinaa]

@@camoTiaras you are right

[@daemonmarchant6179]

I find it hard to believe that particles are winking in and out of existence. More likely they are interacting with some kind of even smaller particles, changing state into some kind of waves, and or interacting with local gravity or electromagnetic forces the effects of which we cannot measure.

[@Taomantom]

Thank you, Anton, for an excellent overview of the total madness that is the world of Quarks!

[@douglaswilkinson5700]

Quantum mechanics.

[@SusanC147]

Hey Anton, love your channel-it helped get me through ThePlague, too! Thanx for that. Please consider doing an episode on (theoretical) quark stars. Also, I have the Ingenuity T-shirt. Please consider adding "Hello" to your other tees as well-it would feel weird walking around proclaiming myself as a Wonderful Person. I like the Hello WP wording -it's much friendlier! Subscriber & always give you a thumbs up! Thanx again!

[@mhick3333]

I miss the little solar system model from the 60s way simpler

[@carlo70no]

I prefer the Christmas pudding model

[@GSPV33]

Fantastic video, thank you Anton.

[@plasmaBrain]

Close to my dissertation research. We thought we had identified it with the f_J(2220), but the BES measurement didn’t hold up, so time will tell: “Limit on the Two-Photon Production of the Glueball Candidate f_J(2220) at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring,” PRL, 1997.

[@Fortun.a_Major]

what kind of work do you do ?

[@plasmaBrain]

@@Fortun.a_Major Then, I was a graduate student in particle physics. Now, I am a professor of electrical engineering.

[@mukeshsharma-iq8dp]

Superb! Thank u Anton!👍🏻

[@NeonVisual]

We're like PacMan trying to figure out where pixels come from. He'll never know about the CPU, it will just look like laws of nature mysteriously arising and finely tuned for him to exist.

[@keirfarnum6811]

Pac Man has achieved sentience.

[@o1-preview]

I used to use a similar example a few years ago! We are like mario in the super mario 64 video game, trying to figure out how to get out of the game and into the "real world"! and I guess looking into the subatomic, it's like understanding pixels indeed!

[@user-gv4cx7vz8t]

I mistakenly thought of Mario rather than PacMan before reading the intervening comments. It is clear some sort of gluonicity is happening here. Gravity doesn't matter to PacMan, but it weighs on Mario. It will take a 33rd degree meson to disentangle this!

[@o1-preview]

@@user-gv4cx7vz8t all laws of physics still apply to the binary code that constitutes both games. My comment talks about Mario and yet the original comment talks about pacman.

[@rudolfsykora3505]

I was and till this day still interested what means chromatic temperature as it was describing colour spectrum of high pressure sodium light bulbs on streets back in days

[@jameshall1300]

It has to do with the blackbody spectrum. Each temperature has an associated frequency of light that a pure blackbody object would emit at that temperature.

[@rudolfsykora3505]

@@jameshall1300 thank you James

[@b.s.7693]

It matters, because it's matter.

[@ameetdmello2525]

I like all of Ur vids. So it gets promoted more, subsequently getting more humans interested in science, so we can get to the real goal in life i.e populate our galaxy on priority.

[@corydemeray7594]

CHARMONIUM - the Particle type Pokemon

[@TOMAS-oj9hx]

Thank you for that super interesting video lesson on that topic. God bless you.

[@krumplethemal8831]

Imagine slamming a geo metro into a wall and a Tesla, bicycle, skateboard and train pop out as a result from the smash.. That's essentially what happens when they slam electrons into other particles..

[@Deletirium]

To be fair, a Geo Metro's already not that far off from actually being a bicycle...

[@thomasherndon-io2gl]

Your ability to explain intricate complex processes is greatly admired. This old fart has learned more from you than school ever hinted at. Extremely high compliments on your productions. WOW go wonderful Anton!

[@Jokers_Yugioh666]

Very interesting!

[@Etimespace]

Are there any electrons around the nuclei at all❤️ The atomic model has had time to be modified into a different form even before❤️ Sometimes was theory that the electrons go around the nucleus, etc❤️ Nowadays, there is talk of electron curtains around the nuclei, etc.?❤️ I assume that there is nothing around the cores. In the cores, there would be congestion areas of❤️ expanding energy that would circulate energy scattered in space with all other similar congestion❤️ areas, and at the same time these congestion areas of expanding energy would automatically❤️ push each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand. Thus, it can be stated that the nuclei of atoms expand and circulate the expanding dark energy❤️ as zillions of separate expanding condensations whose expansion can be accelerated so fast by the❤️ expanding photon, they do not have time push each other away from each other as fast as they expand❤️ At this stage, a new registrable electron is created/combined from the expanding dark energy❤️ pushing away from the expanding core, which still consists of energy which expanding❤️ Physicists therefore think that they can remove electrons that already exist around the nuclei,❤️ although possibly they can create completely new electrons❤️ In my opinion, physicists should consider this point of view❤️ What makes this view very interesting is that stars would be born on the same principle from❤️ zillions of expanding condensations of dark matter, which would constantly be pushed out❤️ of the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies❤️ Expanding galaxies would have been formed in space in the early days of the expanding❤️ visible universe when two expanding supermassive objects passed close to each other❤️ The separate expanding concentrations of dark matter would have pushed through each other❤️ again and again and that would have caused them to expand so fast that they wouldn’t have had❤️ time to push each other away from each other as fast as they expand❤️ At this point, they would have started to coalesce into new expanding stars❤️ Perhaps with the James Webb telescope it will be observed that stars were born❤️ as if from nothing. But of course not really out of nowhere, you know❤️ The Expanding supermassive objects in the centers of galaxies would have been born❤️ in their own 3D big bangs on the same principle❤️ So that the expanding galaxies would be large particles that convey information from the object,❤️ which is quite massive and dense because it radiates energy that has the character of galaxies❤️ Naturally, we wouldn’t be able to detect the object we are moving away from❤️ Galaxies would then be particles that transmit information about it❤️ ❤️

[@jameshall1300]

​@@Etimespace dude, quit spamming this crap. No one is reading your essay of word salad.

[@CurtisWatt]

Amazing! Thanks for sharing some of the universe’s secrets 🙏🏽

[@GroundbreakGames]

Thank you, as always Anton, for making life so much more interesting.

[@dusseau13]

I wasn't a particle physicist until I watched this video, not I am just sitting here like a glueball with gravity holding me to my seat. Very understandable video. Anton is a gifted teacher/translator.

[@fakename45]

"We found a new particle..." 😃😃😃 "... that's been predicted by the Standard Model" 😑😑😑

[@johnsherfey3675]

And has been simulated using lattice QCD years before.

[@MultiSteveB]

Its always good to have actual confirmation data...

[@kiiturii]

yall when there's no evidence "it's just theory who cares" when it's confirmed "bro the theory been saying this for years who cares"

[@Ezekiel903]

to definitively confirm the glueball we still need more studies!!

[@johnsherfey3675]

@@kiiturii It's cool that they confirmed it we need more of it! It's just funny.

[@elib5507]

Anton you the man! Thank you always for your incite and explanation in simplistic ways to be understood by the masses we aren’t particle physicists either 🤣✊🏽

[@SebastianKrabs]

I hate getting GlueBalls, it hurts so bad. 😑

[@umat6991]

Tff😄

[@petertillemans2231]

is that condition related to ligma?

[@jimmyzhao2673]

Better than blueballs.

[@sowhanQ]

woah new traffic light design is cool

[@tayzonday]

“Glueballs” sound like a doctor’s discovery, not a physicist’s 🧠

[@robertbeaman5761]

That's when you go to the ER after a superglue incident

[@chriswhite3692]

That paper's title was such a tease. It's giving me glueballs.

[@MCsCreations]

Fascinating!

[@spencerholmes7602]

Super cool. Thanks Anton.

[@WhiteIsraeliteChristianKingdom]

JOB 38:38 ' When the dust hardens into a mass, And the Clods stick together?

[@Tyraelaus669]

I let out an involuntary "ugh" when you brought up lattice QCD (quantum chromodynamics.) lol

[@fairybeliever4479]

Oooh so there is where I put my glue balls. Now I just need to smash some protons.

[@andrewdillon7837]

wow! 1200 views in 7 minutes , popular guy ,

[@matthewwagner47]

You look tired friend. Try not to worry to much. These particaks don't they just do what is natural. Great video. Truely amazing.

[@michaelmartin8337]

There are things called Glueballs? - So I wondered if there are things called Spaceballs🤔 I asked some scientists, they told me - and I quote - "We ain't found sh(!)t!" 👋😂😂

[@Etimespace]

It is assumed that more and more space-dispersing energy is pushed inside the space-expanding quarks, so that all the expanding quarks that circulate the space-dispersed energy are exactly the same. Their density and volume in relation to each other can be changed when their speed is accelerated in particle accelerators. When moving in groups, they experience the change in a different way, according to which of them pushes forward and which of them pushes in the background of the first one or the first ones. That is, they encounter expanding energy pushing against them, which affects them differently according to the order in which they encounter the energy pushing against them. And it affects how they recycle this energy that is scattered in space. Naturally, energy also plays a big role, which accelerates their pace. That too changes the density and volume of quarks expanding in space. The speed of internal movement / time. Internal pressure. Well, when the expanding nuclei are collided, it’s no wonder that in the collisions, energy is dispersed/expanded into space in such a way that physicists interpret from this information that there are different quarks in the nuclei. And yes, the density and volume of quarks expanding during collisions are different. Even so much different that one of the quarks is so dense and small compared to the others that no information is obtained from it in collisions. I understand that some parties assume that protons and neutrons are made up of zillions of separate quarks. Well, here’s another time. Nowadays it is taught that protons and neutrons consist of three quarks that are different from each other. The three quarks form a kite, as it were. In my opinion, four would form a much more logical and stable entity. The pyramid. Tetrahedron. Ok, when the expanding quarks are at rest relative to us, they would already be much more congested regions of expanding energy with the same density and volume Of course, their density and volume live somewhat all the time. While the situation lives on all the time, they come to control each other’s density and volume while circulating with all other expanding quarks this space-dispersing energy of which they themselves are composed. So that it completely changes over time. When someone momentarily expands a little faster than others, its ability to absorb the space-dispersing energy pushing through itself into itself is worse due to the fact that its density is lower than that of expanding quarks with a smaller volume at that moment. Of course, more energy dispersing into space pushes through it, because it is bigger at that moment. The situation will recover as the recycling of energy dispersed into space continues. The ability to recycle energy that dissipates into space is faster because its internal movement / time is faster at that moment. It seems strange that no one before me has been able to consider that perhaps the so-called the atom is completely different from what physicists have assumed. Perhaps the volume of matter is also relative. Perhaps it is the case that time is not only relative. Maybe here we have the key to the theory of everything in physics🙂 Love ❤️

[@deviouskris3012]

Have you attempted to comb the desert to find one?

[@deviouskris3012]

@@Etimespaceyou obviously missed the ‘Spaceballs’ joke that this thread is referencing. It’s a line from the Mel Brooks movie of the same name.

[@michaelmartin8337]

@@deviouskris3012 A Glueball or a Spaceball?

[@lindaseel9986]

😂😂😂😂😂 All Hail Lord Helmet!

[@krishp1104]

2:00 popping in and oht of existance... wtf does that mean? How can something stop existing? Is it like a 4D object rotating so that momentairly it loons like its not there?

[@lindaseel9986]

Glueons, Mesons, Klingons.

[@jengathoughts]

Have we ever ran those colors underneath different sort of light filters, like ultraviolet, infrared, xray, etc? Do they change how they are perceived?

[@sparking023]

Gluonium sounds exactly like the kind of name I would expect from Sci-fi techno babble.

[@ajn465]

Trying to wrap your brain around. Some of these things is no small task. It’s so important that every generation educate the heck out of the next generation because it all gets more and more complex.

[@AnthonySmith-x5z]

No new physics in decades now. Only wasting time with string theory and further proving Standard model.....

[@jameshall1300]

You really haven't been paying attention then if you think that.

[@AnthonySmith-x5z]

@@jameshall1300 go look what many physicists themselves are saying. Most things in theoretical physics are just further proofs of theories from the 60s/70s Even what this video is about was predicted +50 years ago.

[@hazonku]

This is SO awesome. I know the average person doesn't even have a frame of reference to conceive let alone appreciate this sort of discovery but these are the big deal discoveries. Proving out the validity of decades old mathematics is the pinnacle of particle physics. It's ALWAYS exciting when something predicted in equations turns out to be real because it means we're on the right path. More importantly it means potential for funding the ridiculous colliders we'll need to push the envelope even further and maybe one day actually understand the universe.

[@banishedbr]

The glueballs gathered and united as one, and called themselves Flubber xD

[@lethargogpeterson4083]

Yay! (Just don't miss your wedding.)

[@xyzabc4574]

I got entertainment out of the various different ways the auto-generated captions interpreted you saying "glueballs" as completely different words.

[@user-yk5by3uc2b]

My next prediction is krazy glue balls

[@existenceisillusion6528]

3:04 J/psi should be about the relation of angular momentum to the full state. In any case, it really should not be about the people who discovered these.

[@pythonhowto1185]

gods duck tape

[@sixeses]

Thanks Anton.

[@gorgeousgentleman5390]

String Theory might be confirmed with this discovery. All particles are standing ("stationary") wave (Knots) which collapsed to itself ("condensed") to form individual matter ("discrete" particle) which somewhat has well-defined "personality". Imagine them like a Ball of string use for knitting Even the near nothingness "Vaccum" in universe also behave like "standing wave" with particle pop-out to existence in some "edges" of the vaccum wave. (We can't detect vaccum because photon just phase out through them, it is "impossible" to have information feedback)

[@tzvetelinmedanov3772]

At the end it was mentioned how it helps understanding gravity. Isn’t it all clear that it is just a space/mass deformation.Or there are still other strong modern theories looking at it as a force or particle?

[@abdelrahmanmohammed9405]

now I have a lot of questions, does it interact with light? is it stable in close to absolute cold? could gluons arrange in a way that make them so, would have been a nice candidate for dark matter...

[@Singe0255]

I suspect the lack of natural antimatter despite it's equal production prior to the inflationary epoch is where our dark matter comes from. If the asymmetry of matter and antimatter can give rise to the development of 'super mesons' that contain a lot of antimatter, and a little real matter, but don't interact with anything but gravity, and are stable at low temperatures, could explain the normal matter bias and dark matter at the same time. But I may be crazy