Making a Dungeons & Dragons Adventure with AI

[@21_315]

Honestly with a bit of tweaking I could see this working especially the dragon amulet and the squirrel tavern both seem genuinely interesting and give me a lot of ideas

[@thetruelogan0104]

i would never have the patience to do this good job i might run the campaign with my party 👍

[@DnDWalkthrough]

Haha, good luck! It's not the best but it's something! I'm sure someone could have produced something substacially better but the video was mostly just to prove that it can be done

[@cytorakdemon]

"I made a D&D campaign with AI." D&D fans with imagination: "Look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power!"

[@Mira_Mira_0n_The_Wall]

this is the next step of d&d random content generators

[@BallisticSoul6]

This is actually pretty cool mhm

[@DnDWalkthrough]

Haha glad you think so!

[@MrMoggl]

WTF man? That is awesome!

[@DnDWalkthrough]

Haha, glad you think so! It was just a random rabbit hole I fell down into so thought I'd share it!

[@Arnsteel634]

What’s scary is I think this video was made by AI also

[@GM-lx7ji]

i have tested some AI's in the last two months and i gotta say i was surprised with some of the images i got.

[@DnDWalkthrough]

Yes, it's quite amazing! I love the image generation AIs and can't wait to see what else comes out! Technology is surely moving at a fast pase

[@realdragon]

That's really basic story tbh. Party going in and just killing monsters is the most basic kind of adventure. I'm writing that kind of adventure and it will be my first time as DM

[@DnDWalkthrough]

Oh, yeah it definitely is. The OpenAI software isn't the greatest at making an intricate adventure 😄

[@hawkthetraveler6344]

so you took the fun creative part of the game and had a computer do it. Then you organized it, which is the boring part....

[@IceMetalPunk]

I will say, be careful using Greg Rutkowski's name in a Stable Diffusion prompt. He's been very adamant that he doesn't want anyone doing that, because the more AI prompts are put online with his name, the more it dilutes search results for his actual art.

[@elskaalfhollr4743]

Wonder why an artist wouldn’t want that,huh?

[@IceMetalPunk]

@@elskaalfhollr4743 To be fair, he could have simply asked that prompts with his name not be posted along with the art, and it would achieve the same goal of preventing SEO dilution without stifling people's ability to generate the art in a style they admire 🤷‍♂

[@elskaalfhollr4743]

creating an adventure based off of stolen content!!, even impersonating several copyrighted materials! for free!!! am i not an artist guys?!???

[@IceMetalPunk]

🙄 That's not how these AIs work. There's no stolen content, and you can't copyright a style.

[@elskaalfhollr4743]

@@IceMetalPunk first of all, yes, yes you can absolutely copyright a style, especially if the name of the artist is being used to define such style; second, they train the AIs by showing them thousands of pictures from the internet, pictures they have not payed for yet are profiting from without even credit, aka, stolen; this is even worse in this case, where the artist’s name is dropped and thus, the AI, immediately tries to plagiarize within the parameters of the prompt. Need a longer explanation? I tried to make it as inclusive as possible but I’m fearful you might have fallen out of that scope

[@grinningbuck]

Some people aren’t into the AI scene, that’s fair. Although, all art can be said to be copied from somewhere, even other artists. Using programs that can give you a cheap, distilled version of an artist that you cannot afford isn’t cheating - it’s like paying a guy that looks like Tom Cruise to be in your movie. I think what OP is doing is daring in regards to copyright laws, but it should not diminish his value as an artist.

[@IceMetalPunk]

@@elskaalfhollr4743 "first of all, yes, yes you can absolutely copyright a style, especially if the name of the artist is being used to define such style" No, you literally and explicitly cannot. This is settled law. Anyone may copy the style of any artist and it's perfectly fine and legal, as long as they don't copy specific works by another artist. This is how copyright law *explicitly* works, to prevent people from getting sued for taking inspiration from others. "second, they train the AIs by showing them thousands of pictures from the internet, pictures they have not payed for yet are profiting from without even credit, aka, stolen" They're not stolen because they're all public images to begin with. They didn't use art that would have to be paid for. Anyone can look at all the same art used in the training data 100% for free with no payment to the artist. Anything they would have to pay for *was not included in the training data.* It's all public work, nothing was stolen. "this is even worse in this case, where the artist’s name is dropped and thus, the AI, immediately tries to plagiarize within the parameters of the prompt." It's not "plagiarizing". That word means to use someone else's work as your own, which is not what this does. When you put an artist's name in the prompt, the AI mimics that artist's *style*, not their content. It's literally no different from an art student making their own paintings inspired by another artist's techniques. It's inspiration, not copying, stealing, nor plagiarizing. The work is original and unique, only the style is copied, which again, has been explicitly determined a long time ago to be acceptable and necessary to prevent frivolous lawsuits from stifling art. If you don't believe me that style is not copyrightable (or why it's not), please take a moment to look into the following relevant court cases: Steinberg v. Columbia Pictures, and Dave Grossman Designs v. Bortin. In the latter case, here's what the courts decided way back in 1972: "The law of copyright is clear that only specific expressions of an idea may be copyrighted, that other parties may copy that idea, but that other parties may not copy that specific expression of the idea or portions thereof. For example, Picasso may be entitled to a copyright on his portrait of three women painted in his Cubist motif. Any artist, however, may paint a picture of any subject in the Cubist motif, including a portrait of three women, and not violate Picasso's copyright so long as the second artist does not substantially copy Picasso's specific expression of his idea."

[@xx_amongus_xx6987]

@@elskaalfhollr4743 Wrong