Clayton Alderfer and ERG Theory - Content Models of Motivation

[@urbanlegendsandtrivia2023]

I just read Clayton Alderfer's obituary and discovered some stunning information. He actually built a world-class organizational behavior (OB) program at Yale, only to see it dismantled as Yale decided to become a more traditional business university.

[@ManagementCourses]

Sadly, this is the sort of thing that happens too often.

[@PartnerWithAngela]

LOVE THIS

[@ManagementCourses]

Thank You

[@shettyrakshith3245]

This channel is under-rated

[@ManagementCourses]

Thank you Shetty. The channel is still new (in KZbin terms -it's 12 months old) and is growing well. But always glad to have people spread the word!

[@batmansharma5509]

I don't think I'll ever forget this theory. 👍 Ur the best !

[@ManagementCourses]

Thank you, Batman! 🦇

[@ronaldcharles3483]

Understood the theory much better thanks

[@ManagementCourses]

Great!

[@ginokappadonna]

I maybe adding this theory to my master paper. Thank you for content on my journey

[@ManagementCourses]

Glad to help.

[@robertsjennifer1]

Awesome! Bloody Brilliant. Loved All your videos on motivational theories. I wish we had teachers like you where I live!!

[@ManagementCourses]

Thank you - my pleasure.

[@robertsjennifer1]

No, Thank you! I had my exam today and I'm sure I've aced the motivational theories! thank you so much!

[@ManagementCourses]

@@robertsjennifer1 I hope you did! Good luck.

[@maaant6894]

Thank you for all these videos!!! It helps a lot

[@ManagementCourses]

Happy to help

[@avygaildelmontealcantara9894]

How does this video only have 5k views? Great work!!

[@ManagementCourses]

Thank you Avygail - hopefully with your help, more will get to see it. KZbin loves likes and comments!

[@robyn-leepearce3291]

Super helpful - Thanks Mike!

[@ManagementCourses]

Glad it was helpful!

[@edgs011]

If this gentleman was my teacher, I would not need to study.

[@ManagementCourses]

Thank you, Eddie.

[@lizlopez6278]

Love your explanations!!

[@ManagementCourses]

Thank you!

[@Shree.Krishna.]

Thank you sir for your teaching..🙏

[@ManagementCourses]

You are most welcome

[@SuliaAsabe]

Thanks so much

[@ManagementCourses]

You're very welcome.

[@kovyon]

Great Video!

[@ManagementCourses]

Thanks!

[@ashutoshmishra5210]

Thank you ...

[@ManagementCourses]

You're welcome!

[@CherrySabiaga]

Sinetch itey ang nandito para mag review for exam kasi walang handouts sa Ld?

[@ManagementCourses]

I am sorry, but Google Translate can't make much sense of this - it seems to think it's Philipino. I'll help if I can - can you try in English or French?

[@ivancellericontreras1016]

Productivity at work should not be related to the issues a person has outside of work, a person is hired and paid to work and perform at work , to abide by the company’s vision and mission and strive to make it profitable and prolific. A proper compensation /salary should be enough to motivate anyone, a personal life is out of bounds to the company and is in line with the do not bring home to work, work home phrase. equity / equality cannot be measured and should not be part of the business / company model/environment the way a person feels at work, is perceived that they are treated, etc. should under no means be a factor in an employee’s performance. Materials, are available to all end every employee and it is up to them to use these as fit to improve the company’s profitability and success Equality in any form is erased from the workplace as it is an understatement where it is implied that all those employed are mature individuals and who will work in unison to attain the company’s goals and objectives in any form by any means leaving out personal feelings, hopes and wishes concentrating on the company’s goals objective, mission vision, product, etc. Maslow’s and McClelland’s theories are personal and subjective when planning tasks. Goals and objectives are smart, but employee’s participation is limited to the company’s objective, of a final product. the expectancy theory should be : “you are expected to carry out your tasks in order to achieve these objectives and goals” which will also become the employees motivation for peak performance The company’s involvement in an employee’s personal life should be limited to what happens at work, anything else is considered a personal matter and a. No such thing as “apathy, empathy / sympathy” or lack of, we are all people and people go thru situations, emotions, conditions all the time. Concentrate on work at work and on you and your other out of work. Contrary to popular belief, the employees should be and feel sufficiently motivated with the salary agreed upon when hired. With the salary they receive to carry out their duties any other perception, consideration, guess supposition not stated in the contract is invalid. Days off, vacations, sick leave, etc. as per labour laws, etc. stipulated already. The customers expect results from the companies which in turn pay employees to go above and beyond to satisfy these expectations. We all want different things out of life, we all have needs and the only way to achieve this is with money, money comes with a job, work, a result of fulfilling the company’s goals and objectives. companies are set up to make money, not, not for profits. Other public and private services are set up to satisfy a variety of personal needs which cannot be satisfied at work because your workplace’s goal is different, and these may be attained with payment for such services. Companies understand employees, as such pay them a fair salary, do employees understand what their role is? For profit companies deal with tangible products not with answers to existential questions. What would you do, how would you feel if you had a business and the employee was always late, had an excuse, did not complete the tasks on time, you have to excuse yourself to your customers, you are losing clients, looking bad, etc.?

[@ManagementCourses]

Thank you for your opinions. There is so much here I could respond to, but tie forbids. So, let me just address your first point: 'Productivity at work should not be related to the issues a person has outside of work'. Maybe. And yet it is. We are whole people, not automata. If you want to exclude personal factors, you need to hire robots. Your argument is predicated on an unreasonable ideal.