Mandelbrot Zoom 10^225 1080p - Grand Pianola Music

[@billtomson5791]

This particular zoom will always be one of my favorites, has been for years. The color palette is regal.

[@Vassilyev]

Looking back from 2021 I can definitely say that this Mandelbrot is still one of most beautiful. It's unique and I watch it again and again.. Music is amazing.. 👌

[@lakevacm]

Just when you think you’re about to pass through the Mandelbrot, it keeps going forever accompanied by angelic voices

[@jeanlin8474]

This is like you are dreaming of waking up from a dream of dreaming of waking up, and so on.

[@gijane02]

??????

[@gijane02]

I had that

[@davedonnie6425]

Mandelbrot: Oh yeah just going through my day doing the equation fc(z)=z^2+c and coloring all the points that stay fixed black, and color other points based on how fast they get to infinity. (Months of coloring later) Mandelbrot: What is math even...

[@BlindManBert]

I love not only the musical selection for this rendering, Meditation HD, but also the choice to generate the constant “background” snowfall in the black regions. I don’t know who rendered this, but it’s extremely well done. Also; thank you for not squeezing this down to fifteen minutes or less. Must share!!

[@robertunderwood1011]

Quite beautiful and John Adam's music fits it very well.

[@deborahlabreck8457]

I have just seen the endless beauty of all the universe. This is incredible. Thank you so much. 👍💜

[@wesofx8148]

That 3D particle effect combined with the zooming is the craziest thing I've every seen.

[@RobKaiser_SQuest]

Been coming back to this for 8 years. Channels like Maths town are good but they don't quite "get" "it" like this vid does

[@davedonnie6425]

I love it when there is just a random mini mandelbrot in the middle of tons of color, like just all of a sudden it doesn't tend to infinity.

[@irchonite1953]

Supposed to be doing math homework involving imaginary numbers and fractals etc Looks up fractal zoom Gets lost watching a 33 minute long video instead of doing homework

[@ac7thed3mon]

"math homework" "fractals" hahahahah really you have no fucking clue what the fuck you talk about. face it.

[@GrigorisDeoudis]

Wonderful loop of the microcosm into the macrocosm and vice versa... shared ~

[@PurposefulPorpoise]

Thank you dearly for sharing this

[@Meenadevidasi]

Great background music. thanks

[@brianblack3357]

As live is this is it brings me back to the physlosiabin days. LOL!!! Fry Balls. . . . . . .

[@kloebykloebator6483]

Very good. Beautiful Music too :)

[@kathleensutherland6593]

Exquisite!

[@iamthetinkerman]

I like to think this is how the universe works. Even thought. Sometimes when I think about something, within a few days that thing materialises before my eyes, as if my thought was a fractal and as time moved forward in space, that thought fractal eventually repeated as a similar shape of my thought. Therefore, I like to think about all the things I would like in life, to have those fractal thoughts eventually turn up in a material way to me!

[@CristaliaMi]

Love the video. It's everything I look for in fractal zoom videos. Unfortunately, the music is quite loud and not meditation friendly. I just mute my iPod and play my own relaxing music on a separate iPod while I watch the video. Very useful for putting me to sleep at night :)

[@isaahliu]

what if the universe works in a similar way - one can never see the infinite details, and we only exist on a specific level in the infinite many level of scale, and we can never surpass the limit...?

[@Xpertman213]

The way interpret it is that, perhaps the universe is just pattern, and that there is no fundamental 'stuff' which act as building blocks. It is just pattern on top of pattern. Of course I don't know, but it is possible.

[@lukem8177]

Sorry, I don't want to seem like I'm intruding on your philosophy with my science. That's the idea of the Plank length. It is the theoretical smallest distance you can detect change. One easy simplification is to think of a cube with edges of the Plank length as the pixels of the universe. It's the ultimate resolution and you can't see anything more detailed. PBS Spacetime just did a great video on it. I would recommend you check it out even if science isn't your thing. It's great food for thought.

[@Xpertman213]

Luke McCandless Planck's constant does not imply space being discrete (that is as you said, made of pixels.) This is a misconception. Let me explain how we determine a Planck length. Suppose we have a very small particle (so small that it is effected by quantum mechanics enough that it exists as a probability wave), and we want to find the location of this particle. We can do this to a certain extent by firing another particle through the particle we want to locate, have the two of their probability waves meet and interact, and then note to changes in the particle we shot to try and deduce the location of the other particle. However, because all particles have energy, and we know from Einstein that energy, not just mass, can cause curvature of space time (really e=mc^2 shows us that mass is energy, but that's besides the point) all particles which pass through will have their acceleration increased and thus we no longer know it's location as precisely. The smallest variation occurs to particles travelling really fast, so say, the speed of light. The Planck length is this minimum variation. That is to say, it is the smallest unit in which we can precisely measure particles. This has no implications to the world being discrete, or in your words, made out of pixels. If that was just a useful analogy and you understand it's not true then I apologize.

[@EnteRaro19]

I've always thought of Planck's constant as a pixel of the universe, but I wasn't ever really comfortable with that idea. That minimum change we can detect you talk about, can it be improved with more advanced technologies? Or is it like, a universal law, that no matter how precise the instruments are, you just cant meassure it any more precisely? I feel like a good analogy would be that we can not actually see any atom because they are much smaller than visible light wavelenght. Is not that we need better microscopes, but that it is physycally impossible to watch them. Is it something like that??

[@Xpertman213]

René Alanís Orta I am not seasoned enough in quantum physics or particle physics to speculate on any technology in great detail. The trouble is overcoming the uncertainty principle which states you can never know the precise velocity and position of a particle at the same time. I think as new formulas and areas of mathematics are developed, we may be able to conceive of a technology that could better measure particles but for now, it seems the planck length is the smallest range at which we can arrive.

[@gijane02]

This is nice and the background is pretty :)

[@gijane02]

@Amaya Taylor =) 🍉🍑

[@gijane02]

Pretty Technicolor snow 😍😯❤❤❤❤👍

[@kiriijou8702]

I stared at this for about 6 minutes in the dark. I would recommend for anyone that wants there vision to be momentarily warped.

[@gijane02]

Hmm

[@zhoa]

I love this!

[@manicminer3830]

Thanks!

[@meatfoot4803]

Amazing 😉

[@gijane02]

I like this 👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@patrik600ful]

Beautiful :')

[@gijane02]

Yes, yes it is 👌 ☺🍓

[@gijane02]

Nice job on this :D That is so good

[@jpopelish]

The color pallet is nice, but the technicolor snow storm is just annoying.

[@PickledEntropy]

Right?! Why would you think you could improve math?

[@mediocreicerinkparodies1099]

I agree. And the motion blur at the edges is super annoying too.

[@gijane02]

How??! Not to me :)

[@gijane02]

@@PickledEntropy :(

[@DJMarcotic]

major 2001 vibes from this

[@joos7379]

Fun fact the images in the video are fractals and they have an infinite perimeter

[@s.jensen5934]

Åby Hh Hn

[@meganelaine4693]

this one is super great (;

[@florianchurch]

Great Work :)

[@prankfazza]

What brought me here, was someones mention of our universe existing inside a black hole, and that all black holes contains a universe, which reminded him of Mandelbrots fractals.

[@DirtyHairy1]

wow, thanks!

[@enzila468]

this would make a dope screen saver, if you can get it to loop. Someone get on that!

[@JustAn0therSoul2]

+Enzila google for "how to make a video a screensaver +your operating system Winodws/Mac whatever" download this or a video like this and use it or make one yourself but if you dont know how to do that you should google that too :D

[@kornflakes107]

There's a screen saver with a similar aesthetic called Electric Sheep.

[@gregsonvaux4492]

It looks as though the image changes as it zooms. Toward the center, the black areas are purplish and as they move to the outer rim, they become more black. I believe that all of the colors are brighter toward the center and become darker as they move toward the rim. It also appears that the resolution decreases as objects move toward the edge. Is all of this done to create an illusion of depth? Is the intent to increase the perception that we are flying through a fantastic world? Visually the effect is nice, but I wish that all of the picture (center and edge) were high contrast and high resolution. That being said, thanks for giving us this wonderful video.

[@Canyon_Lark]

+Gregson Vaux I believe if they didn't change the color, everything would be getting brighter. They darken it as it zooms to provide a more uniform color scheme. It makes it so that there is always a somewhat equal overall color the whole way through. Haha its wierd saying that they change the color to make the colors seem the same, but you know what I mean.

[@intvnut]

+talmon glidden I was about to say something similar, but perhaps from a more technical perspective. The typical color scheme for the Mandelbrot set colors points outside the set according to the number of iterations that were needed to determine that the point is outside the set. (The points in side the set are uniform in color.) As you zoom in, you need more and more iterations to determine with some certainty that a given point is inside or outside the set. And, for this zoom to remain interesting, they need to choose a point that's on the very edge of the set. So, assuming that the color scheme is in terms of "number of iterations as compared to the maximum number of iterations needed", and the maximum increases gradually as a function of zoom, then the 'fade out' happens naturally as a function of that natural rescaling.

[@joshkanawite7646]

I wish the zoom was a little bit faster. This was spectacular to watch.

[@AndrewHokanson]

Josh Kanawite Press the gear/cogwheel on the bottom right of the video, and move the speed up. :)

[@AndrewHokanson]

Josh Kanawite The only thing is, that will also speed up the sound :/

[@joshkanawite7646]

Andrew H. Huh, thanks.

[@gijane02]

Technicolor snow = 👍👍👍😄✨

[@GravInducedSleepTrac]

Like space ships! Such as, A UNIVERSE is for a GALAXY (cluster), is for a SUN, is for a SOLAR SYSTEM, for a PLANET, for an OCEAN, / ATMOSPHERE, for a MOTHER, for a WOMB, for a BABY, for a BRAIN, for an IDEA, for a ROCKET, for a SPACE SUIT,...... Each SHIP, is a BRIDGE to the next SHIP! No? The question is, where in the series of SPACE SHIPS are we? And did we build this SHIP, to WREAK ?(;

[@jonnynik7626]

33:30 gosh dangit, we're at the Start again

[@gijane02]

0:01-33:30

[@ci.netproductions]

just crank up the iterations to an UNREASONABLE AMOUNT so the colors match the first frame... then flip the image! now you got yourself a gif!

[@Dr.Hoffman]

The music is very "Qatsi" like... Nice choice indeed.

[@espen990]

are baby mandelbrots like at 4:00 identical to the "original"?

[@gfgf2123]

Espen Sales same structure but they are more complex and the more you zoom to find it thé more they are complex

[@michaelpardo625]

@@gfgf2123 Through space and time, a baby Mandelbrot does not have an event horizon. The only real Mandelbrot is zoomed out for no reason. Baby Mandelbrots is located inside a real Mandelbrot.

[@chullabatschi]

Where can i contact Mr. Mandelbrot ? Found his Fractale on Google Maps in de Ocean. The World is a Piece of fractale.. omg

[@triotheyoshi]

+Der RaEuBeR He was born 90 years ago, and died 6 years ago. Post the fractalline shard's co-ords, though.

[@chullabatschi]

NOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!! O_____________o

[@EnteRaro19]

where did you find it? Do you have the coordinates?

[@chullabatschi]

Moment pls

[@chullabatschi]

THEY RENDERED IT OUT !!! SEND ME YOUR EMAIL I WILL SEND IT TO YOU ! GOT IT ON SCREENSHOT !!!

[@miguelschwarzbold2219]

Why do use drugs if you can use math!

[@alephomega386]

Don't say that man. I've been a math head chronically addicted to math for years now.

[@johnnybegood1569]

Why do not use both.

[@headintheclouds675]

drugs+math=being on acid watching mandelbrot set zoom for infinity

[@zhoa]

The universe is truly endless, the level of fracticality is unreal...(no idea if i spelled that right im lagged)

[@sethorinmusic]

Any way to get the full quality video for home entertainment.

[@mimarho]

'All rights belong to the original owners. ...' Did you create that video? If not I would like to know who did this. Quotation is a fair thing if you should use other people's materials. - Why I ask? I would like to know how many iteration steps are need for those colors at this kind of depth. I wrote my own programm to create my own images... Never tried this kind of depth...

[@MylesProwr]

Anyone know the name of the piece featuring saxophone that comes on after Grand Pianola?

[@JohnJohnson-hp4my]

+MylesProwr Fearful Symmetries, also by John Adams

[@MylesProwr]

Thank you! I'd been searching but gave up!

[@weirdguygames4294]

my god... its full of stars...

[@MicahBuzanANIMATION]

I want to figure out how to do animations like this. WOuld be cool to combine this with 2D characters.

[@emmanuelnk595]

😎👌💯💯

[@Comrade_01]

omg just sotp i cant see aini more

[@lehman]

watch this while listening to bond street district's latest album.

[@jsl151850b]

Nice. I like the snow. Was that a separate render/algorithm?

[@miguel1waterpolo1guy]

would it be possible to have this as a screen saver?

[@AlienBarbieDollOfficial]

I’d like to email you about the rights of this particular video. Do you have an email, thank you.

[@MrReeboo]

La vraie découverte c'est la musique qui me rappelle celle de Philip Glass.

[@evesolis6133]

Hell why am I discovering new universe at 2am??

[@grantbartley483]

And then you woke up

[@deniscostalunga6586]

What softwar did you use to create this video?

[@johnborden9208]

My internet connection and/or computer are way too slow to play this well, at least with any decent level of resolution. Any chance you could make a download of the file available for sale? This is definitely the most beautiful Mandelbrot video I've seen and I'd love to watch it in all its magnificence. Thanks!

[@NiMareQ]

Great colors! Can you make a faster animation, say 10 minutes long? Can you also make a reversed one?

[@Dr.Hoffman]

click the cog and change the speed ;) WOOOOOOAAAAAH lol

[@robertpemberton3952]

What is this place?

[@GundhamXD]

What episode was it that game grumps talked about this?

[@Визуализациивмногомерныхпростр]

Туманность Мандельброта)

[@fmschiav]

This would be a much more engaging piece were it not for the infantile "shooting stars" that constantly appear without regard to the scaling. The sequence zoom and the score by Adams are spectacular. Why someone would otherwise F-Ck this up is an unbridled mystery.

[@markweisheit6210]

Heal my wife o god

[@Foebane72]

+fmschiav I agree, the Mandelbrot Set is beautiful and awesome as it is, we don't need the distraction of "shooting stars" to simulate the zoom.

[@johnnybegood1569]

lol

[@schmetterlink]

What's with the random snippet from Fearful Symmetries in the last 2 minutes

[@ConsciousRobot]

This is my favorite mandelbrot zoom ever! Can I please use it to make a music video for one of my songs? I will of course credit you!

[@Bimskuuy]

What do the black spots mean?

[@alephomega386]

Bima Santoso the Mandelbrot set is a graph essentially. Numberphile has a good video explaining it.

[@nate25222]

this is the closest ive ever come to understanding ∞

[@TheTodarac]

Fantastic. My only complaint is that its not very high resolution. I mean, you took the time to render this entire video in 1080p, yet if you pause at any point in the video and look along the edges it looks super blurry. Don't get me wrong, I think this is an amazing video. But, sometimes I like to just pause and sit back and gaze at the beauty in the detail, yet whenever I try to do that with this video its just a motion blur :(

[@roncavin5169]

Find a copy of MPC-HC (Media Player Classic-Home Cinema) a quick search in sources of free software will find it. The player has a button marked "step" which, with the playback paused, allows you to "step" forward essentially one "frame" at a time. This way you can find the least blurry part of the image to save. If still not clear enough, it can be further sharpened in graphics software.

[@roncavin5169]

Oops! I just realized I've replied to a comment that's nine months old, sorry.

[@nikolay-5043]

Where sources ?

[@SamuelTIV]

what program was used to create this?

[@jedqwerty]

It was copied.

[@ona512]

nice trance up till 17:18. why you scare me like that

[@Sara-uc4zp]

Ketamine❤

[@brothermaleuspraetor9505]

Pro tip: mute these vids and play Minecraft menu music over it in background. This is what falling into a Black hole is like. We will never know what happens when the last of us becomes extinct, because unlike the rest of the Universe, there will be no more Humans to witness our death. A finite ending within an infinite Universe. Good job our other dimensional selves are doing better than us :) I feel sorry for those who didn't make it already. Maybe it's 2, or 4, 8, 16 or 32 or even 64th. Or 128th? 256th? At some point in the chaos, there is a moment of stability. When you see it, then try to gather your thoughts.

[@gijane02]

0:24 Pretty

[@espen990]

whats up with all the rubber ducks

[@gijane02]

33:05 song

[@sulfurx777]

You find the shape again at... 0:00 3:45 14:45 33:15

[@MrLeostrauss]

At around 3:30, when the original shape just shows up again with no complexity around it---that looks like a lot of bullshit to me.

[@scares009]

+MrLeostrauss Nah, it's just the way the colouring was done. Sometimes it just looks that way because the colours are so stretched out, that there aren't enough colours to show the detail.

[@MrLeostrauss]

+scares009 FAIL

[@scares009]

+MrLeostrauss uhh... Fail?

[@zeser5230]

+MrLeostrauss Calm down m8

[@scares009]

I still don't get why he said fail

[@jaimepena2052]

4:11

[@futureboy7372]

Is this real

[@yxlxfxf]

Watch while high

[@harryandruschak2843]

+Famfly Why? As a recovered alcoholic, I find I can enjoy this sort of zoom with sober, contemplative attitude.

[@yxlxfxf]

Harry Andruschak Did I say you can't enjoy it while being sober? Or that you *must* be high to watch it?

[@armadillolol1]

420 dudeeeeeeee

[@harryandruschak2843]

Famfly That was implied, yes.

[@yxlxfxf]

Harry Andruschak It wasn't lmao

[@dostwald]

Be neat to run it backwards ...

[@billcisco8116]

Hell.

[@johnborden9208]

More like Heaven, I think.

[@gijane02]

14:52 33:01

[@billional1052]

200 ug deep

[@christrela1543]

odd1sout anyone :'D

[@EnteRaro19]

I don't know how this video was made. I'd be sure this video is not a real zoom. See, a fractal is sooo big (not to say infinite) that the probabilities of finding the same structures over and over again just by tanking a "random" path are literally (1/(infinite,permute,infinite)) % (mindfuck). Unless you had an increidible powerful computer scanning every possible path in order to find those where the same structure repeats over and over again, for yeaaarss, it is impossible this video is a real zoom.

[@MalachiWadas]

Not true Kalles Fraktaler is incredible fast, Go watch videos of that.

[@martinmazanek3549]

As you said, its a fractal, and fractals are supposed to have the same structures over and over

[@EnteRaro19]

Yes but, from the infinite number of possible paths you could follow, how would they know which one is the one that shows you the mandelbrot set again three times in just half an hour?

[@sycodeathman]

It's the same everywhere you go; eventually you just run back into it again no matter where you keep zooming in to. That's the nature of a fractal like the Mandelbrot Set.

[@EllipticGeometry]

Satellites are literally everywhere in the Mandelbrot set. Any part of the set either is one (or the main body) or has them arbitrarily close to it (Misiurewicz points). Visually, you can identify them as a kind of center point resembling a Julia set. Don't be misled by pure spirals (Misiurewicz points) which don't develop into anything else if you stay perfectly centered. Find one, which should be very easy, and keep zooming in on its center. At your current zoom level squared you'll see the satellite. Along the way you'll find ever more convoluted variants of the Julia set. This is especially noticeable at the end of a deep zoom when everything looks like concentric circles. If I've skimmed correctly, this outlines the process in this video: 2:30 Centering on a Julia set 3:53 Found the satellite 7:21 Centering on a Julia set 10:05 Strayed from the path a little too soon (but notable because it was going for a few minutes) 10:21 Centering on a Julia set 14:45 Found the satellite 16:50 Centering on a Julia set 33:20 Found the satellite You can also use math to find satellites directly. It's much cheaper to compute. You only need as many iterations as it takes to reveal the shapeless blob that will eventually develop into a recognizable satellite. And then you only need a few samples to allow something like Newton's method to home in, instead of thousands to millions of pixels. Very convenient. Zoom in all the way to the satellite without a single manual adjustment.

[@Blastoisiken]

Should have sped it up. Way too slow atm.

[@colbybundy6082]

meth, math, what's the difference?

[@Goettel]

Logo ruins it.

[@HurricaneBeryl]

Y

[@JamesWylde]

Mid roll spam

[@ThePuRpLeSkky]

very slow

[@martingrof1685]

That is the point.

[@Axesmellsgr8]

boring

[@shahrokhmirza1177]

Annoynig Background Effect!