Christopher Hitchens interview on "God is Not Great" (2007)

[@ManufacturingIntellect]

Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259 Share this video!

[@GM84GM]

Nothing more frustrating than an interviewer constantly interrupting & talking over their guests

[@demontooth0428]

Yeah this guy can’t shut up.

[@Samn3212]

I just said that very thing to myself out loud. Fucking irritating.

[@brotherben4357]

Guests, no problem. The great Christopher Hitchens? It was very frustrating, even though these two had a long relationship.

[@MFK1967]

It’s unreal… It’s like he’s got some kind of compulsion

[@BlueForTheRoses]

It seems pointless to have a guest if one won't let him/her speak.

[@erichodge567]

I could not even finish watching an interview with one of the world's greatest talkers because the host could not stop interrupting him. Charlie Rose, please shut up!

[@rightpa]

Even with the interruptions its still worth the watch.

[@adamwallace7638]

Charlie Rose as an interviewer has done more significant work in his career than Christopher Hitchens wouldve done in multiple lifetimes

[@jazzman2516]

@@adamwallace7638how is that relevant to his conduct in this interview, which is the premise of the comment you’ve replied to?

[@runawayhorsesmusic]

Charley Rose is annoying

[@paulcarter2907]

Wow..I'm listening to this on 24th August 2021, and prophetic are his words!!!!

[@donniebrasco1364]

How stoner and unprophetic and mediocre are his words... He is not God. Social Media is a cult not sacred at all

[@patcomerford5596]

Hitchens is a great loss personally and to the world. I am so grateful that there is a substantial record of his erudite critique of religion. Thank you for this upload

[@willdavey1565]

Yes there would be so much material for him to discuss now in 2022.

[@liamkilkenny8454]

Why is a guy who died ( like us all ) a great loss - ? - did YOU think he was going to live forever ?

[@patcomerford5596]

@@liamkilkenny8454 Where in my comment did I state that I thought he was going to live forever?

[@liamkilkenny8454]

@@patcomerford5596 you said he was a great loss - to who??? What are you going to do now - after your huge personal loss ? - are you going to change your mind - or are you going to be a huge loss to someone else ? - and all here losses are going to mount up ! - and all is left is a mountain of losses !!

[@patcomerford5596]

@@liamkilkenny8454 Read again and your first question will be answered. All living naturally involves loss and depending on our personal values and beliefs some are insignificant and others are 'great'. I also experience the great joys of life. But I keep going engaging in living until I die. I do not have a mountain of losses, you are being presumptuous.

[@hassangz]

Almost a duty to say Mr Hitchens, thank you for what you have done for me and your influence on my way of thinking.

[@johnbrowne3950]

If Hitchens could talk from Hell he'd probably say he was sorry for influencing you.

[@W3RK1Nit]

@@johnbrowne3950 He influenced millions and will continue to do so for many years to come. At least until your superstition is finally relegated to the fringes of society. It has already begun its slow but irreversible death march. Can you feel it? I kick it in the ass every chance I get.

[@thiagomarconi2841]

@@johnbrowne3950 yeah right lol

[@laisziepseuzan426]

Agreed, he taught me a lot about thinking as opposed to what to think. It's a shame the vacuum he left behind in his death has never been filled.

[@bobupen6476]

@@johnbrowne3950 I don't believe there is such a place as hell, how and why do you believe that there is ? Tell me what I don't know.

[@whiteowl87]

"[Pakistan] had Al-Qaeda sympathizers in their nuclear program, and the CIA knew nothing about it." with a smile on his face. What guts.

[@reginaford8575]

USA has lost all the wars since WWII

[@pblogger9065]

Charlie Rose cementing his place as the most overrated, cloying, name-dropping and sycophantic of interviewers. He doesn't want to learn (or help us do so) he wants to show he's the smart kid at the smart kid's table.

[@badvegan]

As much as I dislike Charlie Rose for a variety of reasons, one of which was he way he always interrupted and talked over people, he did at least ask good questions most of the time that required some substantive answers.

[@mp5249]

Destroyed by his own sexual deviance. Hooray

[@philipkilmer790]

Thank you! Exactly, talking over Christopher Hitchens even just to end his sentences seemingly to show he knows something. I wanted the "interviewer" to just shut the hell up so badly that I couldn't finish this crap interview.

[@kamuelalee]

@@philipkilmer790 Rose talked over Hitchens because as smart as he was he still needed to be fact checked.

[@paulmichaelfreedman8334]

I never liked charlie rose, he likes to dominate and I have the distinct feeling he's exactly the same in his private life.

[@greadion4]

All I can say is that I am grateful for Hitchens work. Thank you Christopher Hitchens.

[@electricmanist]

If you are limiting your understanding to that of Mr Hitchens, then maybe it's time to look deeper into the miracle of life. NDE experiences (You Tube) might be a good starting point.

[@DontDrinkthatstuff]

Christopher was wrong

[@captur69]

At least hitch existed....

[@manueladarazsdi9675]

Hitchens would have be apoleptic over what is going on in 2021. His insights would be sobering and invaluable.

[@LaplacianFourier]

Nice word, apoleptic

[@thedoctor.a.s1401]

He would have detested biden for abandoning afghanistan to the taliban and our kurdish allies in syria. Which will come back to make us in ass. Let there be no doubt about it.

[@gerryhanly3194]

The interviewer is so annoying with his constant interruptions. We need Hitch today. A truly great man.

[@liamkilkenny8454]

What was great about him ? What’s his legacy - except nothingness- nothing left only a recording of his hopeless future for mankind ? ! - go for it - he’s a first invitee for every party 🎉 of human expression and enjoyment - a must person to lift up the human spirit of a future beyond our mere earthly experience ! What a depressing mixture of a human chemical being !

[@gerryhanly3194]

Hitchens argument that all religions are man made is compelling. He shows that the idea of a personal God who watches over everything is ridiculous. The idea of a personal God may be comforting but it is not real.

[@louisesumrell6331]

I practice the Dharma of Zen Buddhism, but in a purely secular way, as a philosophy rather than as a religion. I've always admired Hitch.

[@jamesstevenson7725]

What is secular Buddhism????? 😮😮😮😮

[@connorbarr6934]

I've recently discovered Hitchens and I think what he says is incredibly interesting. I'd love to know what he'd have thought about current world news.

[@woodytheduke]

I guarantee that he would not like trump

[@jimmyaguilar4103]

@@woodytheduke compared to who? Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden? Usually politics is a choice between the bad guy, and the REALLY bad guy. Do you think he would of picked one of them instead?

[@woodytheduke]

@@jimmyaguilar4103 probably not Hillary,,,did not like the Clintons at all,,,,but at the very least they had some experience and they could hold a conversation. Hitchens does not care for idiots either though

[@vanguard4065]

hitchens would be a trans woke crt in favor of censorship and pro abortion although he was pro life but more so he would cater to the left grifting for fame

[@garysergeant9086]

Me too

[@weavethehawk]

This interviewer consistently interrupts his "guests" answers with his own comments. Thankfully, Christopher Hitchens is, and has always been, intellectually equipped to deal with these kinds of interviewers. Even so, Rose should develop the ability to listen to his guests before barging in with his own viewpoint.

[@bposs98]

Yeah! The whole time, I was thinking that this interviewer is terrible! Stop talking so much!

[@Jamminn555]

Absolutely right. Preempts, steps on and/or interrupts Christopher so often, cutting off Christopher's sentences and answers before he can finish a thought.

[@kenneths.perlman1112]

Rose always thought that he was himself so brilliant that viewers wanted to hear him.

[@killyourtelevision999]

Charlie Rose did that to almost everyone. Not just Hitchens.

[@willmpet]

He knows Hitchens and is questioning to get more information not interrupting!

[@fullmatthew]

He was an incredible man.

[@liamkilkenny8454]

Yes totally Unbelievable!!!👹

[@electricmanist]

@Generic Name Oh what a spurious statement. Those who understand the spiritual nature of all being, appreciate and acknowledge the true nature of all which exists. Certainly (some) religions have used misused spiritual guidance by replacing it with political control of one sort or another. But don't be beguiled, because the true spiritual nature of all that is , is far beyond political one upman-ship or games. True spiritual awareness (not necessarily religions) enable one to see (be aware of) the true purpose of human existence, Facile comments relating to brains and religions indicate a complete lack of understanding of the purpose of life.--- including your own.

[@electricmanist]

@Generic Name Well you do appear to have rambled on a bit - ranging from a defense of Mr C Hitchins, then to all points downward, ranging from Darwinian theories to Spiritualism. So maybe you can appreciate that it's difficult for me to follow through any cogent points you wish to make regarding any purpose to life. However, in your sweeping (one size fits all it seems) condemnation of NDE (Near Death Experiences), nowhere can I find any personal experience(s) of this phenomena. So on the face of it, you are way above your head by trying to minimize the reality of these experiences-- not to mention the truths/understandings contained within them. It is one thing to disagree with the validity of the NDE experiences, but unless you can offer any other explanation for these events, then your objections (such as they are) are no more than opinions-- which seem to be based upon lack of knowledge and personal experience. The use of "famous names" to support your point of view, doesn't really amount to very much.

[@electricmanist]

@Generic Name Forgive me if I have mis-interpreted your EMail, but it appears that you reject any recollections of NDE's (Near Death Experiences). One would normally expect that any valid/ worthwhile comments on this matter, would come from those (people) who have personally experienced a NDE.rather than any theorist. Great thinkers or philosophers etc might well have commented on matters pertaining to life and death, but often that amounts to little more than say (for example) a garbage collector commenting upon the principles of astro-physics; --in other words it is vital that personal experience/understanding rather than 'off the shelf' intellectual theories, are really what matters. Unfortunately we live in a society in which the name or social standing of a personage is accepted rather than any personal experience (or spiritual understanding) they might have had. Yes, the world has its quota of charlatans, not to mention drug takers and others of the "listen to me I know everything " ilk. They are 'two a penny' as you well know. Those who are unable to accept that consciousness exists on many levels (say life and after life existence) , usually do so either by reason of a lack of understanding, intellectual prejudice or by reason of not personally having experienced A NDE. It might be preferably to heed the actual accounts of those who have experienced a NDE, rather than all the renown theorists who can do little more than that they are known for;-- theorize. You Tube has many personal accounts of people who have personally (and actually) experienced a NDE.

[@tommythompson7941]

As a bitter Irish Catholic, I think this bloke is a great man that we lost too early. Respectfully, rest and peace be upon you Chris.

[@poozer1986]

I'm extremely happy he saw the destructive nature of religion, especially Catholicism. Imagine how insufferable he would have been, if he were more like his brother. At least you got 1 Hitchens on your side. The far weaker one, but it's something I guess

[@chrispywilliams1992]

what do you mean by bitter irish catholic? do you mean ex catholic?

[@jackwegener3484]

Sir, I share your sentiment about his early passing. I think you should be informed though that he detested being called "Chris". His name is Christopher.

[@zapkvr]

To be fair he smoked himself to death so call it suicide

[@georgeyoung8450]

What Catholic is not bitter ,or thinks he is Irish. Peace is always, just out of reach , because of someone else.

[@bernaldelcastillo1768]

The interviewer has no tact, interrupting Hitchens all the time

[@ВиталийСлонов-ч4ъ]

The world could so do with a Christopher Hitchens now. Badly missed.

[@electricmanist]

Maybe you can buy a small statue from your local market, as a substitute ? Probably just as effective !

[@ВиталийСлонов-ч4ъ]

@@electricmanist I'll have yours instead. Send it to me care of Jesus. How's that?

[@electricmanist]

@@ВиталийСлонов-ч4ъ I'm afraid your EMail makes little sense in its present form. Perhaps if you re-word your Email. I will be able to send an appropriate reply.

[@HENRYHENDERSON-wh5nk]

he drank like a mule

[@vinsvids1]

It's as if Charlie wanted to compare his kindergarten certificate of accomplishment to Christopher's Oxford degree.

[@electricmanist]

There are more speculative fools with university degrees than you have fingers and toes!

[@ethanhitchcock5431]

I've read ' God is not Great ', I agree with lots of it , I need to read it again ,it amazes me how many people ive encountered who insist that I must ' believe ' in something , that I must have beliefs , as if there is no other way to look at and understand the world...as if experience has no bearing on my existence .

[@jameshogan6142]

Christian Hutchins was a great man and will never be forgotten.

[@chrispywilliams1992]

wow you fucked that one up

[@jameshogan6142]

@@chrispywilliams1992 Crispin Hutchinson will never be forgotten.

[@chrispywilliams1992]

@@jameshogan6142 that's better.

[@markcreitzman8728]

Colin hughes was amazing

[@chrispywilliams1992]

@@markcreitzman8728 too far. You ruined it

[@jgmcfc]

I miss him.

[@Redman680]

Me too, bud.

[@chrismall8285]

Why invite someone for an interview and then interrupt them when they are answering your questions

[@jagotiberan2181]

I occasionally like to listen to adversarial interviews like this with Christopher Hitchens. Listening to how his voice inflection changes when he’s arguing more aggressively.

[@kristabel71]

Love Hitchens in these one on one interviews but why does Rose insist on talking over his guests?! It's obnoxious and unhelpful.

[@gailmackenney303]

I love him. I miss him. He was great all around. But, although his thoughts on Iraq are all true, his conclusion on us going in there is maybe the one thing I disagree with him on.

[@andrewhack2708]

Agree or disagree with him, if you possess at least half a brain cell, you are compelled to listen to him.

[@donovanreimer2324]

These kinds of egotistical hosts have all been shamed now by Joe Rogan. If only they could sit down for three hours and mostly listen. Wasted opportunities, wasted time, wasted life. If you’re going to host an intellectual, give them time and space to think and talk.

[@JMT1985MO]

I'm so sick of the comments: "Oh the host won't let him talk blah blah blah". It's a damn conversation you sycophants.

[@donovanreimer2324]

@@JMT1985MO that’s what you would think if that’s the way you thought.

[@dixonhill1108]

@@JMT1985MO The funny part is that its not like there's a shortage of interviews. If I want to let someone speak endlessly, I'll watch random interviews with whoever, good interviewers create great conversations.

[@markcreitzman8728]

Mr Rose interrupts far too much considering people tune in to hear the guest, surely

[@dixonhill1108]

Hicthens is a leftist who's critical of the democratic party, no bigger threat to a hollywood liberal.

[@benstevinson764]

Hitch Was a Great Intellectual!!!

[@BLAB-it5un]

Charlie Rose is an absolute embarrassment here. He is so flagrantly self-absorbed constantly interrupting and trying to prove his intellectual superiority to a guest who so obviously outclasses him.

[@corymcpherson1235]

13 years later and we are still in old Iraq

[@tylerzdad1]

It would be nice to be able to hear the man speak without the reporter cutting him off constantly

[@scottsmith2235]

Charlie hardly scratched the book--it was all about his personal roast on Iraq.

[@kamuelalee]

Charlie asked because Iraq was in the news then and Hitchens had been doing reportage there.

[@theodorearaujo971]

Religion survives because anxiety and the desire to control others survives.

[@randyr1952]

Religion survives because man cannot accept death is final.

[@dixonhill1108]

Or you know we're factually a product of a supernatural event/aka creation of the universe as we know it. We have a supernatural creator, you can't really debate that. Simple concept causation, everything had to come from something, we're a product of a super natural creator. An entity that literally created everything from nothing. I'm not saying whatever that was is a christian god, but it is well beyond your frame of reference. To pretend religion is based on irrational fear alone is absurd. You're simply scared of the idea that something you can't explain has a certain kind of power over you, even if it is simply a clockmaker god.

[@electricmanist]

@@randyr1952 Clearly you have little understanding of the purpose of life. Life is a physical experience via which the individual spirit learns the essence of the creative force, which is Love.

[@electricmanist]

Conventional religions might well embody some forms of (humanistic) control within their ethos, but that is not a sufficient reason to dismiss the wonder/creation of all that is, as nothing more than some secular 'game'.

[@electricmanist]

@@randyr1952 Since (presumably) you have not yet died, you do not realize that death is not final.

[@ChantingInTheDark]

As usual, Hitchens was correct

[@MuhammadsMohel]

Specifically his pro-life arguments

[@captainzappbrannagan]

A brilliant man, gone too soon.

[@electricmanist]

So if this man has 'gone', gone where ? Into meaningless or emptiness,, without any purpose ? If one follows Hitchen's arguments, then one has to accept/believe the meaningless not only of his existence, but ipso facto, all that he thought, said, or believed. In essence his very existence and the universe itself.. A bit of a waste of time if you think that way, about it. Alternatively, life itself has creative meaning, as does all matter, from an atom, to the amazing universe. You choose.-- meaningless accident or purposeful (spiritual) design/intent.

[@captainzappbrannagan]

@@electricmanist The universe doesn't care if you live or die our sun will roast our descendants fully. Just because it makes you sad people can't exist in an imaginary virgin lala land doesn't mean anyone should waste time thinking its real.

[@electricmanist]

@@captainzappbrannagan It would appear that you don't realize that the same force (energy) which created the universe, also created you-- not to mention all that is, such as other celestial planets/universes. Now if you think that all the energy demonstrated/manifest throughout the entire universe, originated, and maintained, from moment to moment originated from nowhere, you have a strange concept of physics. Remember--Nothing means nothing--not even space. let alone any form of matter--- yet every atom of matter, (even that which we call space) at its heart, is maintained/created and perpetuated by energy. Energy remains a constant, no matter what form it takes. (manifests). Yet it would appear that you think all this energy came,---comes--- and will continue to exist, from nowhere, all by itself. Well well !! You need to wake up and consider that energy is the essential factor inherent and maintaining, all that exists. For want of a greater awareness/understanding, many choose to describe this (creative !) constant intelligent energy, as God.

[@captainzappbrannagan]

@@electricmanist lady you just pulled a creator out of your but. the universe's energy is eternal. No gods needed. end of story.

[@electricmanist]

@@captainzappbrannagan It seems that you are another of the 'everything came from nothing' brigade. All by itself ! No creative mind (God), and all the power and laws (yes LAWS remember) which continually govern all matter, from atomic particles to galaxies etc, came from nothing too ! Well well. Amazing ! It seems all you need is a magician's top hat and black cape, and voila ! bacteria, viruses, and all forms of life on earth (not to mention the wider universe), pop out seemingly from nowhere too. By the way, what is the source of your 'universal eternal energy' ? Is that in the magician's hat also ?? Even a brief study of atomic physics would reveal to you, that all that is , (everything) is ENERGY !!! Intelligent creative energy !

[@HENRYHENDERSON-wh5nk]

I would have preferred a more free ranging conversation, But excellent as usual.

[@wardka]

I cannot finish this wretched ongoing interruption.

[@kamuelalee]

Fantastic interview between Charlie and Hitch!

[@jiff80]

I like the return on the question of prospecting for oil. “We as in who?” Our side. Bang!

[@orchoose]

What is he talking about at beginning is happening right now as U.S. soliders are leaving iraq.

[@johanoberg1157]

Never did agree with Hitch on his Iraq and other pro-intervention takes, but on religion and iconoclasm I'm 100% with him

[@Tt-rw2hy]

@25:44 Interesting point on the distinction betwixt fiction and non-fiction writers.

[@erichodge567]

A great insight! Thanks for highlighting this. The funny thing, though, is that Hitchens had a most musical prose style. One of the things that set him apart from the rest was that his prose sang. In fact, he himself narrated the audio version of "God Is Not Great", and I can tell you that it was the thing that sold me on his writing. Beautiful.

[@chester-chickfunt900]

So, what happened to all of that oil? Is it still there? Why?

[@blackbird5634]

It is the peak of arrogance to suggest that a god who allowed the holocaust to happen could be summoned to help YOU find your car keys!

[@starfireooo4844]

The interviewer should shut up and let Hutch answer the question...

[@psurviver]

In 2022… let him speak!

[@gonesnake2337]

17:00 for religious discussion. Everything before that is Iraq war talk.

[@Flohpange]

Rose is annoying. Overly dramatic, it's like he's acting the part of an interviewer - a bad one who wants the camera mostly on him and interjects constantly with non insightful comments at that. Good riddance.

[@jayforr6964]

Left us far to soon

[@valmid5069]

Christopher Hitchens: God does not exist His Christian brother, Peter Hitchens: *Are You Sure About That?*

[@Siobhan94404]

Jeez, Charlie, let the man talk already. Your interruptions are enormously irritating!

[@johnmaisonneuve9057]

I have read Christofer’s god book, great book, I’m going to read it again.

[@JuanHernandez-ry9dr]

Hitchens was force for atheism. Just imagine if he was a catholic preacher ? He could have easily sold himself as God and he would have been believed.

[@theoutspokenhumanist]

Hitch loved the US and left our shores in order to live there. I wonder what he would think of the rise of the Christian right and what he would do. It strikes me that the criticisms he levelled at middle eastern regimes may now be levelled at the potential near future of his adopted home.

[@robert-cu1xo]

Lots of religious people saying God does not say you get fried forever,it does say this and they say hell is just separation from his again not true it's punishment for being separate,most people bow to this monster it makes you ashamed to be human

[@robbielanoue2690]

It would have been cool if hitchens wasn't spoken over half the time.

[@simonacland9028]

Who is the host? I like him

[@bbmtge]

You simply cannot say with a factual basis that no secularist or atheist would desecrate a sacred building.

[@mari-greciaodal2436]

Did Hitch call the Taliban "a silly gang?"

[@khomatech0]

Sunni, genius

[@mopnem]

Unfortunate we missed the kind of dismantling he would’ve done to the current Republican Party.

[@e.g.7612]

Democrats wouldn’t be spared either.

[@mopnem]

@@e.g.7612 oh 100%. But if yr a chris fan & being honest with yourself, it’s the Republican Party he’d have more issue with. Republicans aren’t even republicans atm.

[@e.g.7612]

@@mopnem well, he also was hesitant to answer questions about “what would X think if he were alive today?”. In countless interviews and lectures he demurred on such questions (whether about Orwell or TJ). In that vain, I will not venture to say against which party he would be more polemic. I’ll only say that he would have plenty to choose from against both

[@mopnem]

@@e.g.7612 yeah, def was thinking about the Orwellian nature of the left, he def would have something to say about that, good point.

[@officialcoachdanny]

How not to conduct an interview, just constantly talk over your guest 😡😡

[@vitalisakaloyski5758]

Charlie wouldn't shut up.

[@rmendel1000]

Who else screamed at Charlie Rose "shut the f up" more than ten times during this interview?

[@2CHACHOUU]

ANYONE TALKING ABOUT DUMMMBBMOCRACY,I have no RESPECT,where on EARTH does that EXISTS?

[@MarjorainMD]

god is Not GREAT, but Christopher Hitchens was/is. Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex and more violent. It takes a great touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction, such was the case of Professor Hitchens, his legacy ensures his immortality. 💐

[@jazzman2516]

A dialogue does not consist of attempting to catch the opponent out, but instead of carefully listening to and trying to understand their arguments, then offering reasonable additions or counter arguments to them. In other words, a dialogue should be two people trying, cooperatively, to produce the strongest possible arguments on either side of an issue. Charlie Rose does not do this in this interview, nor do most interviewers today. It baffles me that journalism, which the Ancient Greeks got so right, has gone so dreadfully wrong. Logic should be the first language of anyone who contributes to the spread of information in any form or capacity. Instead, we live in a world of misinterpretation, misrepresentation, logical fallacies left unchecked, and endless attacks on straw men. It gets us nowhere if we are unable to see that a debate, discussion, conversation (whatever you want to call it, I prefer the term ‘dialogue’), should be a constructive session of logical argumentation, not a series of intellectual attacks on individuals. In order for us not to destroy ourselves, and to prosper indefinitely, this is the necessary next step of our evolution, should be choose to accept it.

[@jaymfom6963]

Hitch becoming a neocon later in his career is one of his shortcoming to me!

[@rogermarheine9967]

Hitchens understood religion very well. His cultural/soclal critique grasps the psychological aspect of religious manipulation. In that regard, he was as good as anyone. However, he never fully grasped imperialism or imperialist rivalry. He became a cynic as a failed elite socialist, or as Terry Eagleton called him, a champagne socialist, now akin to Zizek and other disenchanted idealists.

[@martynphillips6646]

Interviewers who constantly talk over their guests, it's ignorant and pointless! We are over 17 mins in before we hear about the actual title of the interview, the book!!

[@johnv2681]

Charlie rose was the worst interviewer. Good riddance

[@moonshot242]

This Interviewer should learn the basics of communication, it is just useless to listen because every upcoming answer is immediatelly interrupted.

[@steveymoon]

Jeeez, that interviewer liked the sound of his own voice, eh?

[@petec3615]

And what a grating voice!!

[@MFK1967]

The threat from terrorism and Al-Qaeda did not turn out to be as mortal as we thought… And we’re still taking off our shoes at TSA

[@rightpa]

Why do you think that is?

[@jaixzz]

1989-'90 Iraqis invaded Kuwait with the intention of propping up PRICES of PETROLEUM CRUDE OIL

[@jaixzz]

not a bad idea Mr.Hussein😎

[@jaixzz]

plus Let Hitch have the mic mixer😎

[@benstevinson764]

Christopher Hitchens Was a Highly intelligent and intellectual individual!

[@growshakephil]

Hitch’s legacy continues to be scarred by his stubbornness on Iraq.

[@TheGoodShipBlue]

Another supporter of Kurdish genocide. Only our biggest ally in the middle east besides Israel. Cheney's sins do not forgive Saddam's.

[@rightpa]

Only to those that choose to ignore the obvious.

[@justinmartin4662]

Seems pretty obvious to me that people in that part of the world don’t want the US or the West to be nation building. We’re forcing our culture on them and people like Hitchens doesn’t seem to notice or care because a few people he knows happens to be in favor of democracy, though I’d bet a large part of that is simply due to opportunism. If the people wanted democracy and the US involvement then it wouldn’t be the atmosphere it has been there and we wouldn’t need to prop up what minor force has been mustered, men who when it comes down to it either can’t cut it or just aren’t enough.

[@seth210]

It *seems* obvious doesn’t it. Yet the idea that there should be any society that is built not around the ideas of the enlightenment that all people are equal and deserve the dignity of a societal structure that reenforces that, but rather the authoritarian control of religious zealots is simply bigotry with the facade of understanding. If you truly believe in individual liberty how can you possibly believe in leaving totalitarian regimes in power? Unless, of course, you are at heart authoritarian and subscribe to the belief that the people of the region deserve to live in the conditions they do because they’re crazed religious based society is somehow equal to the society changed by the enlightenment when the only education in some of these areas is their book of nonsense about an illiterate merchant that spoke to god. Also, if I were you I would look into the history of Democratic movements in the Middle East. It’s not my job to educate you but I think you would be surprised.

[@chokin78]

@@seth210 the problem with your argument is that you will be policing the world and will be constantly in war. There is no end to it.

[@seth210]

@@chokin78 how pessimistic we get when a few wars go sour.

[@OneAdam12Adam]

Do you just want to let China or Russia bulldoze their way into that region? Authoritarian States are better huh? Theocratic States are better huh?

[@Dreama40]

My god Charlie let the man speak ffs! terrible just terrible interviewing.

[@jadezee6316]

Hitchens was a giant in his time and the foremost contrary opinion to religion who the public has ever witnessed.....though his support of war eliminates him as mandatory reading in my view

[@h.p.lovecraft6904]

Religion is sick

[@ianhartley4749]

Well said about the interviewer constantly interrupting the guest. Spoils the whole thing. We want to hear Chris hitchens not some wannabe chat to show host

[@markfischer5044]

Man...Charlie Rose is a lousy interviewer...forever talking over his guest.

[@richross4781]

This guy is trying to show to Chris, how smart he is. This is not the way to conduct yourself. Chris gets pretty cheesed of by the end.

[@oedipus_tex8660]

Hitch: "All wars are because of religion." America: "Nah, we just want everyone else's resources."

[@TheGoodShipBlue]

It's not yours if I can kick your ass. Saddam's biggest mistake was not getting nukes before Kuwait.

[@FreddieMercury-tn6fu]

Why do these interviewers have to point?

[@elainejohnson6955]

17:04 "God is Not Great"

[@SoldSane]

He predicted the maga mindset and other things in this interview. He was awesome. I miss him.

[@RobVespa]

The host is not good. They talk over, consistently interrupt and don't appear to listen to the individual who is supposed to be their guest - not to mention the embarrassing things they say.

[@donniebrasco1364]

I'm skeptical of social media. I don't feel that it is a god people should worship. Oops mic 🎤 drop

[@anonymous.1303]

Right after Gretchen and Elliot

[@marksalmoneussorcerersupreme]

"RELIGION IS THE SIGH OF THE OPPRESSED CREATURE, THE HEART OF A HEARTLESS WORLD, AND THE SOUL OF SOULLESS CONDITIONS."

[@electricmanist]

Religion is one thing-- true spiritual awareness is another. Are you able to differentiate ?

[@marksalmoneussorcerersupreme]

@@electricmanist either way your indulging in the fantasies of primitive peoples from the middle east 2000 yrs ago.

[@electricmanist]

@@marksalmoneussorcerersupreme Perhaps you would care to enlighten me (us) as to just how or why anything exists at all. Remember, the rules:- 1: no space,; -- (nothing---nada!) 2: no atomic structures (and the associated power) relating to the composition of all matter -- 3: no universe (since that would of of course have to include matter and space. 4; No intelligence --since that would imply purpose or intent. 5; No time --since that would suggest a sequential order of events. 6; No intelligence (not even yours) since that also suggest a purpose. Oh I could go on and add many other requirements to this list, but I have made it simple for you. So kindly, --if it's not to much to ask, -- how or why anything at all ? PS And no Middle Eastern fantasies either !!! Let's keep it purely 'scientific' !

[@marksalmoneussorcerersupreme]

@@electricmanist #1 Time is based on human perception, Einstein and Stephen Hawking have made that evident. #2 the reason humans are Sapient is because we evolved our way into getting a limbic system. #3 the existence of the physical universe and all it's contents isn't evidence for a supreme being. Life exists to pass on traits & information onto the next generation going on and on indefinitely, until life ceases to exist. Sentient life was a bitter sweet incident as a result.

[@electricmanist]

@@marksalmoneussorcerersupreme Oh such a scientific (yet meaningless) reply to my Emil. Ok if you choose to limit your ideas/thoughts to conventional scientific paradigms -- at least you can be sure you wont offend the 'flat earthers' or the "everything is a meaningless accident" or others of a similar ilk. However, when you then wallow in pseudo scientific theories, (and jargon) you reveal that you are clearly out of your depth when it comes to having any understanding of the true (spiritual) nature of man. All your scientific theories just don't register the value(s) of a lifetime of earthly experiences/relationships, not to mention the existence of life itself --not forgetting the universe which surround us. Would you choose to dismiss the value of your life, or others, not to mention all that is , as of little or no consequence ? PS You might choose to pause and consider the constant power within all atomic structures both here on on earth and self evident throughout the universe as a whole.. (Not to mention the self evident intelligence governing all that is) Do you really really think that the laws which govern all matter, just happened by themselves ??

[@CSUnger]

It is the most profound mystery to me why this man, so articulate; so charismatic; so blessed by Providence with such gifts, talents, and opportunities, was so threatened by the simple idea of an objective Reason for living a life of virtue and piety.,

[@electricmanist]

Maybe he got lost in the realms of speculative supposition.

[@steveath]

This interviewer was very rude! Hitch was very tolerant.

[@philmanson2991]

Man, isn't this timely right now - 20 October 2021? Personally, I'm ecstatic that we're out of Afghanistan...never should've gone there. The graveyard of empires!

[@stevennorton485]

unless a man be born again nicodemus he cannot see the kingdom of God john 3 v 3

[@aristotle736]

I always found Hutchins to be extraordinarily smart with logical well constructed arguments...except when it came to Iraq. In there he comes across as an ,arrogant ,self justifying old style colonist .

[@dixonhill1108]

Or maybe he's done his research.