Subsidies

[@MarginalRevolutionUniversity]

Continue learning with practice questions: mru.io/32n

[@KhaiNguyen-sj3tx]

Your videos are always great and be made professionally!!! Thanks for all your hard work!

[@liaqatalihassanzadah4671]

Absolutely useful and very understandable. Thanks a lot.

[@emiraadam5949]

Have exam tomorrow and this helped me a lot 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

[@oluwaseunadeoyeoyebamiji3592]

Thank you for the wonderful video. I have a question, for the Agricultural commodity market (Very close to perfect competition) , Farmers have no where else to go. DOes 7:37 of the video imply that subsidy to the agricultural sector will result in no Dead Weight Loss?

[@dandiaran]

Thank you for this! Just one question: what software do you use to draw the graphs? I've been drawing on Paint and it's killing me...

[@lambdacore016]

How do we analyze total consumer surplus and total producer surplus after subsidy? Would there be overlapping areas in the diagram for each surplus?

[@Frizataufik]

bentuknya setengah trapesium bro masing2

[@jan-owennugent1932]

That's pretty kewl. I learned something new today.

[@sebastianodalsie7687]

I have a question. if the subsidy were for both (producer and consumer) and the government subsidy were in percentages (example 70%). how should the exercise be set up?

[@AllAboutJailbreak]

is there excess demand and a deadweight loss with a subsidy?

[@IonSterpan]

Yes, there is a deadweight loss. Deadweight loss is produced either by to little trade of some good x (when society loses gains from trades which fail to occur) or by too much trade of that good. In the latter case society loses the value which it puts in the subsidy, since in the absence of the subsidy those resources could have been used for something else. But there is no excess demand, because the definition of excess demand is an excess quantity demanded relative to the quantity supplied at a certain price. Or in other words, it is the difference between the demand function and the supply function, at any price. Questions of excess demand arise in the case of a price ceiling. If we were to graph a price ceiling we would drive a horizontal wedge from below between supply and demand. That wedge shows the difference in quantity demanded and supplied. In contrast, subsidies drive a vertical wedge from the right side. It shows the difference in the price received by suppliers and price paid by demanders.

[@mannatkalra7174]

Great explanation! Thank you!!!! :)

[@MichaelSzemethy]

Do you have a link for the lobbyist and politicians pushing these subsidies?

[@chrisjamel8461]

depending on how free market the public sector is....that is to say politically free, negates the deadweight loss. If i spend my vote/political energy or currency on politicians who support subsidies then where is the in efficiency...in fact politically calculated subsidies are imop strategically calculated price adjustments that correlate to public sector market values. These political values may be hard to represent initially.

[@luisblackaller11]

in a perfect market with a subsidy is consumer and producer surplus equal?

[@a.a3408]

Depends on the elasticity

[@raygaytan1836]

My new Instructor!

[@chrisjamel8461]

But then again not all public sector values are productive. Assuming humans will act in mostly rational ways, overtime subsidies will correct for public sector failures. for instance tax write offs such as for charity...in fact charity is far more efficient than taxes imop. but lets say a tobacco subsidy which might cost society externalities and be counterproductive...is still technically productive. in its isolation it weakens the economic power of those reliant upon it. So in conclusion some subsidies strengthen while others weaken.

[@gurujibriyani4007]

Sir i have a question , will minimum price schemes on farm produce beneficial for farmers or farm subsidies on farm produce ?

[@gwho]

11:11 the subsidy is for water. but the elasticity is for cotton. shouldn't the comparison be for the elasticity of water to make a fair comparison? But additionally, what actually are the dynamics and effects of a subsidy on an input good (capital good) depending on the elasticity of the produced good?

[@GatherYeRosebudsWhileYeMay]

convoluted

[@rashad862]

why the supply curve is not shifting?

[@luukverberk6116]

Thank you very much!

[@SureshRajaManickam]

Thank you for the video.

[@jillianconte]

thank you!!!!

[@josephpostma1787]

So subsidies are like tariffs?

[@abugosok8000]

as a customer, I need to pay even more since legal poor statement in form of gov certificate is not on my pocket.

[@PikaJayden]

Confused.

[@costarica8032]

+Jan-owen Nugent Are you interested in living in an Eco village? You should come check out our eco-village in the mountains of southern Costa Rica. It's amazing with thousands of fruit trees, great water and more. Seriously, email me +Costa Rica.

[@cutty02]

Subsidies= no free market

[@Thsiscool]

Yep. More government interference only distorts the overall market.

[@FilthyVarmint]

Bobby Lashley fucking statist

[@bobbylashley192]

Indeed, I'm for the common good, when will you realize there's more to life than Iphones and bitches in bikinis

[@FilthyVarmint]

Bobby Lashley When will you realize the governments usefulness is limited?

[@bobbylashley192]

When will you stop reiterating shapiro/yianno/basic bitch talking points, the government is useful lol

[@tonic10k64]

Whos here for Mr Morrissey IB?

[@raysommers2903]

I can sum up this video as "government subsidies are always bad for the people and the economy".

[@refrenlix]

Mass heric ha7[∆ spacehesp liy

[@AllAboutJailbreak]

is there excess demand and a deadweight loss with a subsidy?