Continue learning with practice questions: mru.io/7pm
@socratos8307 жыл бұрын
University are useless, this video made me learn more than the entire course
@ilhameflh90713 жыл бұрын
i do agree on that hahaha
@nidhishsharma94713 жыл бұрын
facts
@ruzdiyaaniff63983 жыл бұрын
Yeah
@zainamubarak86933 жыл бұрын
My professor make these easy lessons look so hard . I was so close to drop out the subject 🤣
@memonabaig39684 жыл бұрын
Have had microeconomics for 2 YEARS NOW and these guys explain it in such a efficient way! i have learned more in 2 days than I have in 2 years! Bless you both!
@chitralima22082 жыл бұрын
Same here man 💓
@qtmagic3003 жыл бұрын
1 day before micro final. Wish me luck
@chitralima22082 жыл бұрын
Good luck ;)
@peterarthur8344 Жыл бұрын
Me 1 year later lol
@luccellence7 ай бұрын
SAME LOLL
@Spider__________________rrrrrАй бұрын
How was it
@jessea.51858 жыл бұрын
you just saved my life lol. this is so helpful and easy to understand and I feel like a pro lol
@vincentalykin3 жыл бұрын
This was well-written and well-executed. I learned from this video explanation more than I learned from some other videos on the subject that I've watched.
@MA-rc2eo5 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir. I nominate you to be the hero of Economics.
@MatthewGraham0278 жыл бұрын
The explanation about deadweight loss is the perfect example of why economics and policy don't mix well. People would complain like crazy if you taxed inelastic goods. If we were to tax basic necessities, there would be an uproar about how evil this is. We can't even get the public to release the tax break on healthcare even though it is causing a mess. Maybe we should call the relative elasticity of demand in relation to taxes the "coefficient of complaining curve". Very inelastic = lots of complaining.
@tsalvlaxitov95948 жыл бұрын
I know he mentioned exceptions, but again, the problem with this followed to it's conclusion and put into practice is the diagram around 7:27 the left would represent something like luxury yachts and the right would represent something like electricity. "Pretty clearly we want to tax the hell out of electricity because if people are held hostage to it you can get away with it." Sooner or later its going to get around to something people need instead of want.
@iamcr33per5 жыл бұрын
these videos are fantastic man
@mannatkalra71743 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation!! 👏 Thank you so much! :)
@TheBullOfLewisham8 ай бұрын
Thurs 2nd May 2024. 00.05am. Thank you. 👍
@zainamubarak86933 жыл бұрын
Thank you ☺️ I was finding it very hard to understand but now I love econ 😅
@visheshnarula51455 жыл бұрын
easy to understand. thankyou. would prefer your lessons over any book.
@derpydino19154 жыл бұрын
thank you so much the chapter explaining this made no sense what so ever to me and this just explained it making it look like the easiest thing in the world
@darev67805 ай бұрын
Online learning is the way forward
@aleciaharridon10668 жыл бұрын
i love these lecturers economics is not the easiest subject for me and i really understand it better now. have exam in a few :(
@MarginalRevolutionUniversity8 жыл бұрын
Good luck!
@indigowalker87386 жыл бұрын
Me too
@RafalDaBoss8 жыл бұрын
Great Video! Thank You!!
@caryli79898 жыл бұрын
Very helpful and clear video, thank you!
@gizemwoods56488 жыл бұрын
I found the video very helpful :) thx
@TheGirlyDiary4 жыл бұрын
How do you calculate the new price the buyers are going to pay? You mentioned the wedge method around 1:40 but I have no idea what this thing is ...
Жыл бұрын
A bit late and maybe not relevant to you anymore, but they introduced the "wedge method" in a video called "Commodity Taxes" (at least as of the time I am writing this, there is a mark in the video indicating the exact part in which they introduce it). I think they recorded these videos assuming that people would follow the full course/playlist (or that if people look up a specific concept, they will already be familiar with "previous" concepts). The wedge method is simply taking the tax (as a vertical line, whose length is the tax value in whatever units the y-axis has) and starting from the equilibrium point move left till its upper limit touches the demand curve and its lower limit touches the supply curve. It is meant to be a shortcut to moving the supply curve up to account for the tax, finding its new equilibrium point (intersection with the demand curve) and drawing a vertical line from there till it touches the old supply curve (to determine how much the supplier will get after paying the new tax).
@ruzdiyaaniff63983 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir thiz video helps me to get to a clear idea ....
@lindsayweber75013 жыл бұрын
so touching for an excellent video
@أحمدالمحروقي-ج8ظ5 жыл бұрын
this was of great quality thanks
@jannoirvine3 жыл бұрын
I am totally speechless life saver!
@EftekherHusain7 жыл бұрын
very helpful! keep up the good work!
@a-starsibanjeikosa10093 жыл бұрын
This is what I definitely subscribe to
@uluvmycrazymind078 жыл бұрын
I couldn't ask for a better explanation! thank you!
@aryanngupta4 жыл бұрын
I feel like you cannot use the example about the yacht as there are other confounding variables. There may have been a fall in demand for luxury goods due to the economic crisis around the 1990s. I do not think we can suggest causality between the tax and the fall in yacht purchases. Not sure about what people think about this.
@muhammadmuhidkhan586 Жыл бұрын
I am confused on why doesnt the suuply curve or demand curve shift by taxation
@tomlaporta6434Ай бұрын
It is a hypothetical example in order to illustrate the theory. The real work of economists is to gather real world data which validates the theory, without that the theory is just a theory. Conducting such research establishes economic principles and laws.
@robindragirl7 жыл бұрын
THAAAAANK YOU SOOOO MUCH!!!! VERY HELPFUL!! SUBSCRIBED!! 💝💝
@clovernaya62866 жыл бұрын
Very helpful. Thanks.
@jianghaoyoutube50175 жыл бұрын
Third year in highschool and watching economics video too understand cuz I don't get much in school
@yaoyaoxiao66374 жыл бұрын
i cant be the only one thinking about shipping fees while watching this
@ChadLBJ5 жыл бұрын
What and who decides the benefit of something? Isn't that quite subjective? Great video!!
@rachitaggarwal95643 жыл бұрын
Beautiful Video, I am not able to understand this topic. Do like the video so that people know that they will understand it's a good video.
@moumitakar64967 жыл бұрын
grt job .. sir !
@margaretmulbrandon62703 жыл бұрын
Since the amount of the dead weight loss that is a decrease of consumer surplus is due to a reduction in consumption, why is it not named savings, which is usually considered a good thing. It seems to me that only the decreases in producer surplus is a real loss to the economy and even they could use the resources to produce other things like trips to a cheaper city.
@zebediahmuneta55137 жыл бұрын
good explanation
@damianmartinez29248 жыл бұрын
but Why can a deadweight loss occur when a price ceiling is set below equilibrium even though some consumers increase their consumers surplus?
@MarginalRevolutionUniversity8 жыл бұрын
Good question! Check out our video on price ceilings: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5OvcnSJr9-ibKM. If a price ceiling is imposed below the equilibrium level, then the quantity supplied will shrink (see the shortage at 1:07 kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5OvcnSJr9-ibKM&feature=youtu.be&t=67). This means there will be a shortage: more people will want to purchase the good at that price, but there simply isn’t enough production. The price is too low to make it profitable for sellers to produce more. There are a number of people who want the good but can’t get it because of this decreased production. This is actually the source of the deadweight loss- the sales that should have taken place under normal conditions (and the ensuing consumer and producer surplus from those sales) but don't because the price is set below the equilibrium level. The deadweight loss triangles, for consumer and producer, are clearly seen at 2:49 (kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5OvcnSJr9-ibKM&feature=youtu.be&t=169). You’re right though, at the lower price, it’s true that consumers who actually purchase the good may have a higher consumer surplus. This surplus is a transfer from producers to consumers, so it’s not increasing overall surplus. Additionally, if there is a shortage, there may be some lost consumer surplus from having to wait in lines or search for the good, so it may not be a perfect transfer. Hope this helps. -Mary Clare
@alvinjaryenneh64555 жыл бұрын
This is what I call making things easier for students....In my macroeconomic class, this was more than difficult to understand. Now I can teach it.
@kimkimdinar91132 жыл бұрын
You’ve my life when saying ‘ nobody gets DWL’
@ThePeterDislikeShow4 жыл бұрын
Has anyone tried to estimate how much deadweight loss of all sorts there are in the economy at large?
@ThePeterDislikeShow4 жыл бұрын
Does the government ever practice price discrimination with its taxes? Seems like it would be beneficial in reducing DWL.
@aliabdul66449 жыл бұрын
how do you calculate deadweight loss without the triangle method? mathematically?
@EconChic9 жыл бұрын
Ali Abdul You would use calculus. Take the integrate over the quantity no longer produced because of the tax the difference between demand (MB) and marginal cost.
@Ishaanstube6 жыл бұрын
You are very good.
@wenboyali63205 жыл бұрын
Question:' the general rule is to tax goods with inelastic demand' , could this rule apply to tariff? Anyone who can help?
@arfatahmad65944 жыл бұрын
Yes
@nafiskhan880111 күн бұрын
Me watching this video night before exam tomorrow
@kaiser51666 жыл бұрын
Thank you 😍😍
@frogboy8314 жыл бұрын
yeah but how do u find the quantity and price after the tax
@zaynmunir36015 жыл бұрын
You are the best😍
@dementedkaddin7348 ай бұрын
THANK YOU
@shaistaahmed21303 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot sir
@dougbamford4 жыл бұрын
Pareto optimality means the "free market" maximizes happiness only from the initial distribution. If you want to maximize happiness you might want to change that initial distribution, if you want to respect that distribution you aren't interested in maximizing revenue. Are you a Utilitarian or a Libertarian? (And why would you be either a Utilitarian or a libertarian given that neither are appealing doctrines?)
@hqlife51283 жыл бұрын
Land has a completely inelastic supply, so no deadweight loss. Perfect taxes
@abhilashkhajuria7 жыл бұрын
U r the best :)
@arfatahmad65944 жыл бұрын
Dead weight loss can also occur because of high price?
@volhosis37844 жыл бұрын
If you mean price floors then yes, the minimum wage is a good example.
@Mujangga7 жыл бұрын
Does Income Tax cause Deadweight Lose?
@arfatahmad65944 жыл бұрын
Not alwys, tax helps us to set off the spillover effect of externalities
@declaninc6 жыл бұрын
"Wedge technique" how does that work u didnt really explain
@rudraguha46184 жыл бұрын
how is this so good lmao
@puneetsrivastava34968 жыл бұрын
Great
@stemariechin14293 жыл бұрын
icb my 40-pages readings can be explained in a 11-minute video
@jeffrickerson26715 жыл бұрын
this is why we need small government
@mishall9474 жыл бұрын
thank youuuu
@pralaysaha77157 жыл бұрын
helpful
@berknoyan47606 жыл бұрын
You are f*cking awesome! Kel kafanıza kurban dayılar. You are my second and third favorite balds. You know the first one ;)
@yomamasofat4139 жыл бұрын
man economics is so crappy sometimes. what kinda surplus do I get as a consumer? I don't see any money given to me
@busybish51268 жыл бұрын
if you wanted to pay 10$ for a sandwich, but the producer sells it for 7$, you basically save 3$ (that is what consumer surplus means) its the difference between what you would pay, and what you actually pay. I know this is a super late reply but anyone reading this comment from now on would understand more hopefully
@rizkypratama8073 жыл бұрын
You sir look like peter schiff
@MatthewMooreLovesBicycles7 жыл бұрын
So isn't deadweight loss only really bad for the suppliers and the government then? Because the consumer still has $50 (in that example)
@italovasco17 жыл бұрын
Actually the price of the trip was initially $40 , but remember that the consumer was willing to spend $50, so this is the value that he gives to the trip, then he would have a trip that for him values $50 plus $10 in the pocket. Now he just have $50 in the pocket and no trip.
@MatthewMooreLovesBicycles7 жыл бұрын
Yes, but the consumer still has $50 to use as (s)he pleases.
@akanbah91714 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video content! Apologies for chiming in, I would love your opinion. Have you heard the talk about - Tarbbatigan Vintage Sales Tip (Sure I saw it on Google)? It is a good one of a kind guide for finding government and police auctions for cars trucks and SUVs minus the headache. Ive heard some super things about it and my work buddy at last got cool success with it.
@biivincent89052 жыл бұрын
AA universities are not useless go back and check out with your lecturer
@王林-x9b7 жыл бұрын
If I can give a thousand likes I would
@dootzy14385 жыл бұрын
I love you!!!11
@thafrodgod34343 ай бұрын
I can't tell if you chose such high tax rates to make it easier to understand, or if you're trying to inject a little libertarianism into the lecture.
@stemariechin14293 жыл бұрын
bias wrecker ko na tong lalakeng to. magaling magexplain. btw bias ko yung babae na ang hinahon magexplain AHAHAHAHA