I have to say the Fed's greatest power is that everyone believes it can affect the economy. The policies might take time, but just the news of the Fed's actions is immensely powerful. The thing is markets can react in the wrong ways. "Oh interest rates have gone down? That means the economy is bad!! SELL SELL SELL" instead of "Yay the Fed is supporting us, lets BUY BUY BUY".
@maggies48787 жыл бұрын
Excellent Videos!!! Thank youuu !!
@paulfisher63087 жыл бұрын
Easy to miss, but in two spots when Professor Tabarrok mentions the adjustment back to the long-run growth rate, the animation shows movement down along the AD curve back toward the LRAS but on no SRAS curve. Even if we are to assume that inflation expectations adjusted and the SRAS shifted downward, despite not being shown, this would still be incorrect: given the kind of negative AD shock described in the video, the adjustment back to long run would involve the AD curve returning to its original position. After all, households can't cut back forever. This is a dynamic model, not a static one.
@zazalila54504 жыл бұрын
can u tell me what minute ?
@dylanmaher51207 жыл бұрын
At 1:14: If people are spending less (ie saving more), wouldn't that mean there is more money in the banks to lend, allowing the banks to lend at lower rates, which would lead to an increase in lending by banks to entrepreneurs, allowing for "expansion" of their businesses? What am I misunderstanding here?
@zazalila54504 жыл бұрын
@@smashinbedrock4903 wdy mean "it will simply be offset with a lower intrest rate" ?
@gamesheetmusic49914 жыл бұрын
Who is watching this in 2020 during covid?
@robertasrackauskas21374 жыл бұрын
amazing videos
@CStrik3r7 жыл бұрын
If the FED increases the quantity of money and as the video said there would be a higher growth rate, wouldn't that growth be coming from Nominal GDP and not Real GDP? And if so wouldn't that mean that there was no actual growth just perception of it due to prices rising?
@Maowzedong7 жыл бұрын
In the short run an increase in the money supply does have an effect on real output, it is only in the long run that an increase in the money supply creates inflation.
@Capital_Ideas16 жыл бұрын
Isn't the idea of variable lags on effects to monetary policy a myth, due to the expectations channel?
@vaibhavgupta207 жыл бұрын
Now suppose you’re a central banker in this economy and you want to neutralize this change in the economy. That is, you want to return the economy to its original state by pushing monetary policy in the opposite direction of the shock. If you do your job perfectly and the economy returns to its original state, what will the inflation rate be?
@Mujangga7 жыл бұрын
This is why I am a proponent of integrating transmitters in every unit of physical currency and digital footprints in digital money in conjunction with scanners so that every unit of currency can be tracked and scanned at every transaction in order to get a real-time view of the money supply and the velocity of money.
@right-winglibertarian38967 жыл бұрын
End the Fed!
@jimelam72035 жыл бұрын
What a dumb ass!
@bbeaum15 жыл бұрын
Sir, don't know you it is much better to have smart and (hopefully) well intentioned people make a mess of things than let normal people just vote with their daily choices?