Martin Heidegger, Being and Time | Interpretation of Dasein & Temporality | Philosophy Core Concepts

[@gratuitousfootnote1183]

Dr Sadler - are you aware there are some outtakes in this? Seems like something you would usually edit out

[@JonahInWales]

I think it made the video better, nice to see how he comes at his videos and how quickly he can get back on track.

[@vanderlarss]

it shows us the complexity of some concepts...and it also exemplifies how we can approach an idea from different vantage points.

[@GregoryBSadler]

Yep - when you're doing a lot of work under deadlines, that sort of thing that I do edit out most times will creep in

[@gratuitousfootnote1183]

Keep up the momentum, we appreciate all the work you do.

[@GregoryBSadler]

Well, I certainly aim to - but you never know what might come long.

[@wcropp1]

I'm loving this Heidegger series. Looking forward to the next one. I just read Plato's Parmenides for the first time the other night...what a trip! I didn't know Plato could be so tough, but I persevered nonetheless. I feel like this gave some insight into the difficulty of what Heidegger was trying to communicate. I really enjoy hearing his take on the ancients and their differing conceptions of being. Thanks Dr. Sadler!

[@GregoryBSadler]

You're very welcome!

[@MaenadBABE]

I’m writing an essay arguing for becoming vs being, and I thought to myself “oh let me use Heidegger as my supporting evidence”… once I picked up his novel being in time., I quickly realized that reading his text is extremely challenging 😂😂😂 ahhhhh. That’s what I get for trying to be an over achiever. Anyways!! - I remembered your chanel and am thankful for your contribution here.

[@GregoryBSadler]

Well, to start with, Heidegger never wrote any novels

[@massacreee3028]

Nice Plutarch plug professor 11:35

[@daseinbellen]

enjoyed very much, thank you dr. sadler.

[@GregoryBSadler]

Thanks!

[@estebandelacruzg1281]

I liked the way you started the video. I know that is confusing sometimes. I wanted to ask you why are you reading from that particular edition of B&T? Also, is desire a mode of being-in-the-world? From what section of B&T are you reading?

[@3x4architecture77]

He works off of the Stanbaugh translation. (the one from the 90's)

[@3x4architecture77]

He's in the introduction.

[@vanderlarss]

enjoying this. thank you.

[@GregoryBSadler]

you're welcome - glad to read it

[@Alexnovaify]

Put all those interpretations aside for the "time being"...I hope I'm not that one who chuckled at the peculiarity of that phrase in light of a YT video on B&T

[@TheMrthatdude17]

Is it me or is half of classical philosophy 'we don't want to be wrong; so we have to do philosophy this way'?

[@vienna11215]

Perhaps. On the surface, it might seem to be. But consider this: if everyone involved in philosophy strives to "not be wrong", the chance that the ultimate truth will manifest itself will be higher. It's a dialectic approach. True, we will never live to see the ultimate result, but by striving to not be wrong we will be a tiny, minute part of the ultimate end goal. Even if that end goal will only be achieved in a few million years for now, or never.

[@GregoryBSadler]

I've never had that impression about classical philosophy. That's sometimes the case in contemporary stuff though