Marxist Destruction of Indian History - Episode 7: Exposing Irfan Habib

[@vijayanarayanan9382]

Thanks

[@DharmaDispatch]

Thanks for your contribution!

[@rajakshay8776]

There are 26 Shlok in Geeta in which it is written that non beliver should be killed. Shlok are given bellow---- (1) Sura--2 Ayat-- 191 (2) Sura--3 Ayat-- 151 (3) Sura--4 Ayat--56,89,101 (4) Sura--5 Ayat--14,51,57 (5) Sura--8 Ayat--65,69 (6) Sura--9 Ayat--5,14,23, 28,29,37,68,111,123 (7) Sura--21 Ayat 98 (8) Sura--32 Ayat 22 (9) Sura--33 Ayat 61 (10) Sura--41 Ayat 27,28 (11) Sura--48 Ayat 20 (12) Sura--66 Ayat 9

[@SAFFRONSTRATEGY]

Fascinating and an eye opener!

[@jyotsnatiwarisharma2997]

Amazing content. Kudos to you guys to take so much efforts to compile and share the facts . Gradually this channel is sure to become an encyclopaedia, with no nonsense accounts over burning topics

[@DharmaDispatch]

@@jyotsnatiwarisharma2997 Huge thanks 🙏

[@mxxmauuhan3597]

Simply, He has not forgotten "Maqsad". Rest is just the path to achieve the "maqsad".

[@AshishBagade-hv4el]

Exactly

[@cocophonix]

Great episode. Such an honor and pleasure to hear Sandeep Balakrishnan ji.

[@DharmaDispatch]

Thank you!

[@akhileshwarjha1476]

Great exposition of Distortionists of Indian history. They should be banned from the academic community and from curriculum! Congratulations. Best wishes

[@DharmaDispatch]

Thanks!

[@algorithmcs2024]

sir , someone like you with background in a rigorous academic field, like medicine or surgery, should have a solid understanding of how academia functions. they all are likely familiar with the importance of evidence-based research, peer review, and the value of academic freedom. It is very dangerous and makes everyone sad that how you must be working for public health services . It’s clear you have strong feelings about the interpretation of Indian history and the role of certain historians. Engaging with historical scholarship and debating different perspectives is a crucial part of academic discourse. While it’s important to critically evaluate historical interpretations and consider various viewpoints, banning scholars or their work might not be the best approach to addressing disagreements. In academic communities, it’s generally more productive to engage in open dialogue and critique rather than exclusion. This allows for a richer, more nuanced understanding of history and helps ensure that diverse perspectives are considered. The Dharma Dispatch" is associated with a right-wing perspective, So you are also believing on same narrative likewise they say the history books were narrative . Here's how such a channel could present its narrative- Cultural and Historical Emphasis: The channel might focus on traditional values and historical narratives that align with right-wing views. This could include highlighting the achievements of ancient Indian civilizations and emphasizing their contributions to modern Indian identity. Critique of Left-Wing Historiography: It may critique and challenge Marxist or left-leaning interpretations of Indian history and culture. This could involve questioning the accuracy or biases of leftist historians and presenting alternative viewpoints that align with right-wing perspectives. Promotion of Nationalism: Content could emphasize nationalism and the importance of preserving traditional Indian values and cultural heritage. This might include discussions on the significance of Hindu culture and the need to protect it from perceived external influences. Social and Political Commentary: The channel might provide commentary on current social and political issues from a right-wing viewpoint. This could include discussions on policies, national security, and social reforms that align with right-leaning ideologies. Emphasis on Traditional Values: Videos might highlight the importance of traditional family structures, moral values, and religious practices. This could include content that promotes conservative views on social and cultural issues. Historical Figures and Events: The channel might focus on historical figures and events that are seen as embodying right-wing values or that align with a conservative interpretation of history. Debates and Discussions: Featuring debates or discussions with scholars, activists, or commentators who share or support right-wing perspectives on historical and cultural issues. in the context of historical interpretation and criticism, it's essential to consider various aspects: Multiple Perspectives: History is often interpreted differently based on the historian's perspective, methodology, and ideological stance. What one historian views as a distortion might be seen by another as a valid interpretation based on different evidence or theoretical frameworks. Critical Examination: Evaluating historical claims requires examining evidence critically. This means assessing primary sources, corroborating facts, and considering the historian’s methods and biases. In the case of Irfan Habib, or any historian, it’s important to scrutinize their work to understand how they arrived at their conclusions and to assess the validity of their arguments. Bias and Objectivity: All historians bring their own biases to their work, whether they are Marxist, nationalist, or hold other viewpoints. The "truth" in history often lies in balancing these perspectives and understanding that no single narrative can capture the complete reality. Scholarly Debate: Historical scholarship thrives on debate and discussion. Criticisms of historians like Irfan Habib are part of a broader academic dialogue. Engaging with different viewpoints and evidence is crucial for a more comprehensive understanding of historical events. Documented Evidence: When addressing claims about historians' work, such as those related to Irfan Habib's interpretations or administrative roles, it’s essential to rely on documented evidence and verified sources. This includes looking at published works, official records, and credible critiques. The resources are highly credible and represent a range of respected voices in Indian historiography. However, it's important to consider a few key points about the nature of historical evidence and the controversy around saffronization: ### 1. *Primary Sources as Evidence*: - *Why They Matter*: The core strength of the works by historians like Romila Thapar, Bipan Chandra, and D.N. Jha is their reliance on primary sources-original texts, inscriptions, official documents, and archaeological evidence. These primary sources are crucial because they are the closest link to the historical reality, unfiltered by later interpretations. - *Examples in Their Work*: - Romila Thapar’s work on ancient India heavily relies on inscriptions and literary sources from the period. - D.N. Jha’s work on the sacred cow uses ancient texts and historical records to challenge modern interpretations. ### 2. *The Issue of Saffronization*: - *Historical Revisionism*: Saffronization refers to the attempt to rewrite history with a particular ideological agenda, often emphasizing a Hindu-centric narrative. Critics argue that this process selectively uses or misinterprets primary sources to support specific political goals. - *Credibility*: The historians you mentioned, including Thapar and Jha, are critical of saffronization because they argue it distorts historical facts to fit a modern political agenda. Their critiques are based on rigorous analysis of primary sources and are widely respected in the academic community. ### 3. *Historians and Political Influence*: - *Political Context*: The controversy often arises from the intersection of history and politics. Historians like Irfan Habib and Romila Thapar have been accused of having leftist biases, but their work is grounded in extensive research and evidence. - *Evidence vs. Interpretation*: While interpretations can vary depending on a historian’s perspective, the credibility of their work largely depends on how faithfully they adhere to the primary sources. The critiques of saffronization are often about the selective use of evidence, rather than a rejection of certain political ideologies per se. ### 4. *True History*: - *Complexity of "Truth"*: In history, “truth” is multifaceted. The closest we come to it is through a comprehensive analysis of primary sources, balanced interpretations, and the inclusion of multiple perspectives. - *Continuous Debate*: The debate around saffronization is ongoing, reflecting the dynamic nature of historical scholarship. What is considered "true" history is constantly evolving as new evidence comes to light and as historians continue to debate and interpret that evidence. ### Conclusion: The works of historians like Romila Thapar, Bipan Chandra, and D.N. Jha are credible primarily because they are based on robust evidence, particularly primary sources. Their critiques of saffronization stem from concerns about the misuse of history for ideological purposes, which they argue distorts the understanding of India’s complex past. While their work may be interpreted as politically motivated by some, the foundation of their credibility lies in their rigorous adherence to evidence-based research.

[@satvirsindhu6757]

Sandeep Balakrishnan ji, I salute you. You are amazing. Keep doing the good work.

[@swordswam]

So true and factual.......we grew up reading up crap and took us lot of time to drain our brain and replace with facts.....we lost our time and money and our childhood over this....

[@risingsun2995]

Thankyou so much Sandeep ji for educating us .Irfan Jabib was another snake distorted so much of our history.

[@aprameya6623]

Irfan Habib should tried in court for these lies

[@chan_for]

00:03 Discussing the negative impact of historian Irfan Habib on Indian history 02:27 Irfan Habib's connection to history distortion in India 08:04 Irfan Habib's distortion of Indian history and influence on national issues. 10:51 Iran Habib's toxic career as a distortionist par Excellence 16:22 Exposing Irfan Habib's nation-wrecking role 18:50 Marxists manipulate history as propaganda 23:44 Irfan Habib's Marxist perspective in Indian history 26:15 Misleading economic conclusions based on selective data 31:12 Impact of brutal revenue extortion and slave economy in Shah Jahan's rule 33:42 Irfan Habib's Marxist perspective on Indian history 38:39 Irfan Habib fails to provide evidence for his claims 41:17 Exposing Irfan Habib's corrosive mindset 46:15 Irfan Habib accused Professor BBL of being biased and launched personal attacks. 48:43 Iran Habib discredited historical inscription 53:36 Historians accused of fabricating history and provoking communal tensions 55:56 Islamic conquerors systematized agrarian exploitation in India 1:00:50 The speaker expresses somber feelings about the invasion of Bhat and the need for accountability.

[@DharmaDispatch]

Thank you for following the episode so closely!

[@sb9060]

Thanks for the researched facts...

[@girishnambiar7670]

Fantastic expose!!

[@DharmaDispatch]

Thank you kindly

[@vandematram8205]

Great work Sandeep ji

[@प्रशांतअपंडकर]

Could we file RTI to check with NCERT and Eduction Ministry about payment made to him for different project and his work, if he has not submitted anything then what was action taken by them. is there any plan to recover and why not recover if any

[@praveenpai9103]

Still don't understand why all this never comes out in the MSM. Sandeepji is really well read, comes out with facts, only facts. The books he has written, the articles all are must read.

[@mtarkes]

Lets not forget that the courts of India have more often been useless in protecting Hindu rights.

[@naruto_kun-8272]

Sir, When is the third volume of "Invaders and Infidels" coming out?? Really excited for the third book.....

[@dattatreyasharmakb556]

Wikipedia says he is against Hindutva and Islamic fundamentalism. Please throw some light on whether he really opposes Islamic fundamentalism. The podcast is excellent true to the best standards of Dharma Despatch. Kudos to Mr.Sandeep Balakrishna for his well researched topic.

[@hkumar7340]

Please see the comment I have posted below to find the answer to your question. Mr. Habib is one of the worst communalists in India.

[@itiha]

He gave intellectual cover for Islamist, In-fact he supported Babri Masjid Action Committee using his power as ICHR chairman. Wikipedia is a joke

[@RK-es8oj]

Actually he is more against more of hindutwa... other one is for facelift...one

[@cosmicallyspeaking871]

@dattatreyasharmakb556 You are reading things from wikipedia, an organization run by leftists & rabid Hindu-haters. wikipedia is filled with half-truths, lies & outright false information about Sanatana Dharma. It is not an authentic source at all, on a lot of things.

[@DharmaDispatch]

Thank you!

[@ThirumeninathanMurugan]

Thanks!

[@DharmaDispatch]

Please accept our thanks for your generosity!

[@indranidutta1945]

This guy has not stopped his wild guesswork Indian history and of course hate for RSS, hindutva and Modi. Watch his latest Al Jazeera interview

[@prb392]

blood boiled after this and i do not know what to do

[@hkumar7340]

🙏🙏🙏 Just one detail to add to the comprehensive demolition of the 'works' of the worst communalist among Indian historians -- Irfan Habib Esq. Prof. M. G. S. Narayanan (a truly great historian from Kerala) was the Member Secretary of the ICHR during the early 90s, when the Ram Janmabhoomi agitation was at its peak. He has recorded how he overheard Mr. Habib coaching the office bearers of AIBMAC (Babri Masjid Action Committee) before court hearings. These office bearers were sometimes inclined to seek a 'compromise solution' with the Hindu Janmabhoomi organizations. Mr. Habib would shout and berate them, and insist that they should not 'give in' to the hideous Hindus. Prof. Narayanan says that he was quite startled to discover the toxic communal venom that this so-called Marxist historian carried in his heart.

[@swamiprakasha]

This intellectual criminal should be arrested and put in prison or punished in some other way, but should never be left free unpunished, because the crime is confirmed and is massive.

[@DipakBose-bq1vv]

I knew a historian from JNU who in Cambridge University told me that Rabindranath was a fanatic Hindu as he used to be an organiser of the Hindu Mela which also had organised the Swadeshi Movement of 1905.

[@abirsen5146]

Rabindranath tagore was 6 year old when Hindu Mela was established, his brother Dwijendranath was the organizer. Plz brush up your history bro.... ;) half baked knowledge is problematic.

[@Kathakathan11]

Lol JNU people act like they have credibility due to their knowledge, but rather it’s because of the nexus they carry. A JNU student told me that hinduism is filth as their temples abuse elephants and Thai Buddhist was cool as they never abuse elephant, I shared my cousins picture fo Thai trip and she was sitting on the elephant. The friend refused to accept that was Thailand 😂😂😂 Delusional filth of the the society

[@ohm4500]

Which university did you study? WhatsApp facebook twitter

[@abirsen5146]

@@ohm4500 galgotia wale lagta hai

[@DipakBose-bq1vv]

@@ohm4500 I got a PhD from Birmingham University, followed by a post-doctoral research fellowship at Cambridge University, and a Lecturership at Oxford University, followed by a Professorship at Nagasaki University.

[@ManojSingh-bg9ue]

Thank you!

[@satishsaxena9147]

Yes,YOU are Right. Suppression of TRUTH, as discovered or Excavated, by the patient Historian & Archeologists, is Natural for one who has Sympathy ₹ Loyalty to Two Imperailisms: Middle Eastern & Colonial-British. He cannot forget his loyalties.

[@KannadaRama]

Full disclosure - As a schoolkid, I never believed a word of my history textbooks because 1. How could I verify if those things were true ? 2. Even if parts of it were true, how could it be meaningfully complete in a few paras/pages ? In short , I had concluded at a young age that our history books could have only contained lies and half truths. 💪🏿

[@jihadifreewrold1374]

❤❤❤ for your efforts..

[@santoshkrisnamurthy]

Really informative and well researched. Just one suggestion. When names of historians and characters are named, can you also show their image or pic so that we can better relate and understand who they were. If not all at least some like when Shri Sandeepji mentioned BB Lal.

[@JaanbaazKoshur]

Very enlightening. Great work.

[@nrao8977]

Karl Marx is the 4th Prophet in the Abrahamic system. The Das Kapital was Marx's "book" or Bible. Klaus Shwab (sp?) is the 5th Prophet, and his "book" is The Reset (downloadable free of cost from his Church, the World Economic Forum (WEF)).

[@rameshbathina400]

Wonderful knowledge. I learned a lot.

[@dravinashkadam575]

Salute to Sandeepji

[@JYOTIPANDA-xj2hv]

👌👌 Wonder how the self declared cults must be viewing lesser mortals putting their eminence under microscope in full public glare.

[@shubharamesh5110]

I love listen to Sandip Sir both in Kannada and English. His knowledge about Indian History is simply amazing. But who is there to challenge Distorshinists claims with references and data. What present day Historians are doing? They must be busy in working projects on Distory!

[@dravinashkadam575]

Request to comie all these 7 eisde together and give free link sothat pee can download and isten again and again. Becoz the will never come inn textbooks. People may not have access to these historians again . Hence this knowledge must be digitalized and preserve for generation's to come

[@radhajoshi161]

CIE that is Companion of Indian Empire (British regime) Sir Jadunath Sarkar has also distorted history of Shivaji Maharaj

[@cookiemonsta6074]

YET ANOTHER SUPERB EPISODE, ALOK ... SO PROUD Of YOU!! EACH VIDEO OF YOURS IS AN EYE-OPENER !!

[@naturalremediesofbhagwatis5787]

Pranam, aap k channel behad informitive aurjaagruk karnewala hai, itne Kam subscribers kaise🙏

[@utsabgangopadhyaya4274]

Please provide us with the list of relevant references, in the description of the video.

[@rohanbansal2324]

Keep up the good work guys, seems like my parents' generation is plagued with such foolish ideas about our own history, ideas that are obviously Marxist in origin. I didn't even have to discover the level of detail you guys went into before calling BS as I have observed our own people, though kind as they may be, have never shied from rebellion and brute force in the face of injustice, and yet people of your generation buy into the utter nonsense that us Hindus simply bent over and welcomed these hoards. Nah, it's not how it works. Perhaps the biggest contradiction in my head is how do we come to idolize our elders like Bhagwan Parashuram did (obeying his father's orders) when what they utter is malicious lies?

[@Kuldeep-vb8mi]

You can see the effects of history on the personality on the youth psyche.

[@DipakBose-bq1vv]

This gang from Aligarh, Delhi and JNU copied from the Pakistani textbooks, as proved by Dr.Rossiter in her PhD thesis at the University of Texas. These gang members are not Marxists; they follow Pakistani and British historians. Marx was not anti-Indian. Marx was not anti-Religion either. He wrote Religion is the sigh of the oppressed, heart in an otherwise heartless world. In his books, India's First War for Independence 1956-58, and Notes on Indian History, he admired India and wrote against the Islamic invasions and slave trade of the Ottoman Empire. The Aligarh gang also supported the Aryan invasion theory promoted by the British. Marxists at Moscow University support the observation of BG Tilak that the Aryans originated in the Arctic Circle of North Russia before the last Ice Age and came to India in about 27000 BC when the Ice Age started to escape from death. Modern DNA studies support that. At least 20 per cent of the people of North India have the same DNA (R1a1) as the 40 per cent of the people of Russia. Tilak's books are translated into Russian by Russian archaeologists.

[@amartyachakraborty6863]

Marx died long before 1956. How he can right a book about an event as indicated by Mr. Bose (1956-58)?

[@amartyachakraborty6863]

The Revolt of the Sepoys took place in 1857 and not in 1956.

[@sagarpaul3926]

Mr Balakrishnan should cite the source of his information in a post so that serious readers can verify them

[@krishnakumarsingh7292]

Sandeep sir please arrange hindi version of your precious books.

[@mohangsk3759]

Sirs then why were they continuing for the past 10 years with such impunity ..

[@krishnakumarbalakrishnan1665]

When we hear about this we expect to destroy all the memorials left in India. But Rajputs couldn't stop the Mughals&Sultans from rule India. More over what Indians to do with communisam? A temple or other kind of memorials should be constructed to remember our suffered ancestors!

[@AryanRex-cu7jt]

Sandeep sir big fan ...please post a bit more longer videos your videos are far far better than watching those shit reels

[@algorithmcs2024]

It’s clear you have strong feelings about the interpretation of Indian history and the role of certain historians. Engaging with historical scholarship and debating different perspectives is a crucial part of academic discourse. While it’s important to critically evaluate historical interpretations and consider various viewpoints, banning scholars or their work might not be the best approach to addressing disagreements. In academic communities, it’s generally more productive to engage in open dialogue and critique rather than exclusion. This allows for a richer, more nuanced understanding of history and helps ensure that diverse perspectives are considered. The Dharma Dispatch" is associated with a right-wing perspective, So you are also believing on same narrative likewise they say the certain history books were narrative . Here's how such a channel could present its narrative- Cultural and Historical Emphasis: The channel might focus on traditional values and historical narratives that align with right-wing views. This could include highlighting the achievements of ancient Indian civilizations and emphasizing their contributions to modern Indian identity. Critique of Left-Wing Historiography: It may critique and challenge Marxist or left-leaning interpretations of Indian history and culture. This could involve questioning the accuracy or biases of leftist historians and presenting alternative viewpoints that align with right-wing perspectives. Promotion of Nationalism: Content could emphasize nationalism and the importance of preserving traditional Indian values and cultural heritage. This might include discussions on the significance of Hindu culture and the need to protect it from perceived external influences. Social and Political Commentary: The channel might provide commentary on current social and political issues from a right-wing viewpoint. This could include discussions on policies, national security, and social reforms that align with right-leaning ideologies. Emphasis on Traditional Values: Videos might highlight the importance of traditional family structures, moral values, and religious practices. This could include content that promotes conservative views on social and cultural issues. Historical Figures and Events: The channel might focus on historical figures and events that are seen as embodying right-wing values or that align with a conservative interpretation of history. Debates and Discussions: Featuring debates or discussions with scholars, activists, or commentators who share or support right-wing perspectives on historical and cultural issues. in the context of historical interpretation and criticism, it's essential to consider various aspects: Multiple Perspectives: History is often interpreted differently based on the historian's perspective, methodology, and ideological stance. What one historian views as a distortion might be seen by another as a valid interpretation based on different evidence or theoretical frameworks. Critical Examination: Evaluating historical claims requires examining evidence critically. This means assessing primary sources, corroborating facts, and considering the historian’s methods and biases. In the case of Irfan Habib, or any historian, it’s important to scrutinize their work to understand how they arrived at their conclusions and to assess the validity of their arguments. Bias and Objectivity: All historians bring their own biases to their work, whether they are Marxist, nationalist, or hold other viewpoints. The "truth" in history often lies in balancing these perspectives and understanding that no single narrative can capture the complete reality. Scholarly Debate: Historical scholarship thrives on debate and discussion. Criticisms of historians like Irfan Habib are part of a broader academic dialogue. Engaging with different viewpoints and evidence is crucial for a more comprehensive understanding of historical events. Documented Evidence: When addressing claims about historians' work, such as those related to Irfan Habib's interpretations or administrative roles, it’s essential to rely on documented evidence and verified sources. This includes looking at published works, official records, and credible critiques. The resources are highly credible and represent a range of respected voices in Indian historiography. However, it's important to consider a few key points about the nature of historical evidence and the controversy around saffronization: ### 1. *Primary Sources as Evidence*: - *Why They Matter*: The core strength of the works by historians like Romila Thapar, Bipan Chandra, and D.N. Jha is their reliance on primary sources-original texts, inscriptions, official documents, and archaeological evidence. These primary sources are crucial because they are the closest link to the historical reality, unfiltered by later interpretations. - *Examples in Their Work*: - Romila Thapar’s work on ancient India heavily relies on inscriptions and literary sources from the period. - D.N. Jha’s work on the sacred cow uses ancient texts and historical records to challenge modern interpretations. ### 2. *The Issue of Saffronization*: - *Historical Revisionism*: Saffronization refers to the attempt to rewrite history with a particular ideological agenda, often emphasizing a Hindu-centric narrative. Critics argue that this process selectively uses or misinterprets primary sources to support specific political goals. - *Credibility*: The historians you mentioned, including Thapar and Jha, are critical of saffronization because they argue it distorts historical facts to fit a modern political agenda. Their critiques are based on rigorous analysis of primary sources and are widely respected in the academic community. ### 3. *Historians and Political Influence*: - *Political Context*: The controversy often arises from the intersection of history and politics. Historians like Irfan Habib and Romila Thapar have been accused of having leftist biases, but their work is grounded in extensive research and evidence. - *Evidence vs. Interpretation*: While interpretations can vary depending on a historian’s perspective, the credibility of their work largely depends on how faithfully they adhere to the primary sources. The critiques of saffronization are often about the selective use of evidence, rather than a rejection of certain political ideologies per se. ### 4. *True History*: - *Complexity of "Truth"*: In history, “truth” is multifaceted. The closest we come to it is through a comprehensive analysis of primary sources, balanced interpretations, and the inclusion of multiple perspectives. - *Continuous Debate*: The debate around saffronization is ongoing, reflecting the dynamic nature of historical scholarship. What is considered "true" history is constantly evolving as new evidence comes to light and as historians continue to debate and interpret that evidence. ### Conclusion: The works of historians like Romila Thapar, Bipan Chandra, and D.N. Jha are credible primarily because they are based on robust evidence, particularly primary sources. Their critiques of saffronization stem from concerns about the misuse of history for ideological purposes, which they argue distorts the understanding of India’s complex past. While their work may be interpreted as politically motivated by some, the foundation of their credibility lies in their rigorous adherence to evidence-based research.

[@RavindraKumar-yw5jm]

But I am appalled that Indian teachers and students kept quiet while these anti nationals had their field days over a century from dad irfan to son irfan.

[@dravinashkadam575]

Nice word coied as Distorians

[@ulkapatil2277]

Sir one episode for the propaganda of Jyotiba Phule

[@hawkeyes5703]

❤❤❤

[@Swamy_VivekAnand]

Cant understand what led people to🧎accept🧎the🚽served by the👺distortionists👺without questioning their orgins & sources❓️🤔❓️🤔❓️🤔❓️

[@jihadifreewrold1374]

Connect dots....marx.....Lenin....Stalin.....mai....jihad.... Congress....cpm

[@AlokSaxena-gj4hj]

We are very late in analyzing the likes of Irfan Habib. The damage has already been done in India, and Irfan must be so happy for what he has done.

[@mohangsk3759]

All naxal activity is also People’s War Group

[@Athirahindustani]

You keep saying marxist marxist but he was a jihadi at heart 🙏🏽

[@Chopraviraj]

How does one know what the ustad said to habib? Like do something for the quam? Is there a reference? Prefer listening to Namit Arora’s ‘Indians’.

[@satishsaxena9147]

I was half Right that my Comment grounded in facts, would NOT be brought to the NOTICE of the Discerning Readers.

[@RK-es8oj]

3:28 really....

[@sudhir4274]

These all historian were trained and indoctrine as anti sanatani, so with govt. Firm support they went any length to doctor the history.😻😻😻

[@harshbehl4]

🙏Jai Shri Ram 🚩🙏

[@Cmr_5vifail]

The real culprit

[@rexxbailey2764]

WRONG!! THE REAL CULPRIT OF IT ALL WAS THEIR HALALA FORNICATING DEBAUCHED GRANDFATHER OF THEM ALL! ' THE ORIGINAL ISLAMO / COMMIE ' ' NURUL HASSAN! 😑😒☝

[@jayantjoshi6282]

We need a similar episode on fake historian Ramachandra Guha

[@Kuldeep-vb8mi]

We should have never adopted English language. Like Chinese we have to make one language, one tongue, one nation project. It would have saved us from foreign ideas and cunningness.

[@hAvu07]

Abt the Mughals' economic genius, why did they make donations to the Caliph, Mexxa and all the sundry visitors from their homeland

[@vc2616]

🕉🙏

[@srinivasavenkatachalammond9260]

Past is past we all say. Nehru put in his book present comes from past very good . But don't equate past with history Unfortunately we do especially in our schooling. This is making lot of misinformation as true in our schools and controlling our mind set. We have to make a concerted effort to change this. Hope i could see that happen. Irfan n romila are just,#*"# what I have to discribe them

[@dialogswithgod7128]

Common sense begs the question... If Mogal's could do such wonders in Bharat why would Mogal's need to come across 4000km to into Bharat instead of prospering their own land/nation.. His entire theory collapsed with this one above statement.. 😜🤣

[@nrusimhamveeram]

fundamentallly islam as well as abrahamic religions have two things against idolators; 1. they dont understand that hindus use idols as a medium to reach out to subtle or forces that cannot be understood with our senses. for example by creating an idol of sun and meditating on the idol and qualities of sun, you gain knowledge of sun and its powers. 2. basically idol worship is a science like modelling. 3. abrahamic people say there is only one god ; as far as hindus, they also say there is only one god; but he manfiests himself as several. Moses could not understand the logic; asked his followers to kill/enslave the enemies/dimmies/kafirs/idolators and to this day world has seen billions of death as per google maria wirth

[@Batega_toh_Katega_Hindu_108]

Even if they understood they pretent to ignore and continue with their world domination agenda.

[@debuojha1033]

Irfan Habib kà wallah habibi ho çhúkà, distórian hai ea admi.....😊

[@tsParamesh]

Sir, Irfan habib, a jihadi writer?, fake historian? 😮

[@Sudiptakamila81]

Mf..musli...historian fake narrative....

[@Islamicepistemology]

Why true Indian history is presented by upper caste .. invite some Dalit scholars… does true indian history means upper caste brahminical history….😂

[@QoSabKuch]

​@Valiant-uu8cxread the user name on the original comment..no point trying to explain to her/him

[@nv9991]

Why true Indian history presented by Ashrafi Islamist and Islam barbarism apologist Kafir? Invite proud and quran studied Kafirs. Does true Indian History mean whitewashed Islamic barbaric history by Ashrafi Islamists ..

[@Islamicepistemology]

@Valiant-uu8cx why Target Marxism as a approach to history, it's just one perspective to look at history...

[@Islamicepistemology]

@Valiant-uu8cx discussion becomes rich when you include different strata of society. Society is much more than 3% of population. India will not be dictated by 3%. See who are these so called true historian balakrishnan, Sharma, tiwari.

[@kaushikbasu3778]

@@Islamicepistemology Is it your point that only circumcised ones have the right arrogated to them to write history? In any case, the best brains belong to no caste.

[@sumithobis]

call k k mohd. here. it's totally true 👍