The Marxist Destruction of Indian History: A Mega Series - Episode 1: Itihasa, Tarikh and History

[@DharmaDispatch]

Dear friends: We hear you. A major revamp of the channel is in the works. We beg your patience for a few more days. Your love and blessings and support mean a lot. 🙏🙏🙏

[@mohanadari9221]

We stand behind you! Now the west has monetized viewership. Why are you not taking the advantage of the population number in Bharat? Damn, outside of China is there another Country that can claim as much viewership? So my request to youth of today, think how you can monetize on viewership. Your channel must attract people and Bharat has more than you can consume. Think creatively how you may tailor your offering or presentation so appealing ; credible ; relevant and practical. The people are waiting for such absorbing content as I and sadly others like me are just consumers of real content!

[@yogeshp2k]

This is an amazing channel. Thanks to everyone contributing to this channel.. Is there an upcoming series which talks about the non-marxist version of the Bharat history itself. Thanks!!

[@FigthAGAINSTSCOIALISM]

I suggest a book called Road To Serfdom by Hayek. You can easily find the audiobook. But it's mainly talking about the corruption of the UK. During ww2 by the socialists. But it's general book that can be applied anywhere. Mises books are good.

[@yogmudra_]

I think the common theme that emerges across Indian history has 3 elements: 1 - Failure to recognise the enemy 2 - Underestimating the enemy even after recognition 3 - Constantly offering the benefit of the doubt to the enemy or assuming that the enemy follows the same principles as you. At every point that this civilization has faced defeat, it has always been a combination of these factors.

[@user-xyz766-aBclmpq]

Read Savarkar. He lists seven shackles or bandi that led Indian civilization to be repeatedly conquered. This includes cow worship, casteism, samudra bandi or not crossing the river, etc.

[@aroyleo]

Hi! Can you make an episode on the Marxist destruction of West Bengal? And how it chained the foot of Kerela's economic growth?

[@knottytoob]

Excellent suggestion. Kudos.

[@rishisharma3591]

Please do something about the audio setup. I will still watch but I want our discourse in the best possible quality so that it creates interest for those who are new to the channel

[@What.does.it.take.]

I agree. The mic is closer to the host who is very clearly audible, while Sandeep ji is muffled.

[@ashishgautam3679]

Pleased please please use a good mic 🎤 🙏🙏🙏

[@subbu1823]

Thanks

[@atulkanagat4034]

Please try and publish the transcript of these sessions either as a compilation or integrated and edited as a “book.” This is very important work and needs maximum circulation.

[@atulkanagat4034]

Thanks!

[@DharmaDispatch]

Welcome!

[@ashishgautam3679]

Mind blowing. Ive got super clarity now how fabricated history writing started in India. 🙏

[@tapanjoshi7710]

Good stuff, its horrifying how we were manipulated without even knowing anything about it.

[@AryanRex-cu7jt]

Feeling so grateful to listen history from you sir ...please continue the series ...dont listen to those who are saying bad sound quality....namaskaram sir 🙏🏻

[@swapganges]

Totally agree 🙏🏾

[@natarajanamirapu8443]

Sir! As usual, your content and quality of delivery is extraordinary! Kindly take care of the audio quality! Thank you, sir!

[@rohitashchoudhary2113]

Eye opening. Very well desribed.

[@HereToSay]

43:32 calling the British smart conveys a sort of positive image, I think we should go with shrewd. Also, massive respect to Sandeep sir 🙏

[@ppat2437]

we should call them cunning vulture

[@mohanadari9221]

Very impressive and eye opening. The sad realization that it is History we cannot change is very disturbing, unless, there is a sudden surge of Historians like Jadunath Sarkar and RC Mazumdar et all, to re-write the Historical wrongs but with a great amount research; evidence and sincerity to their purpose of establishing the Truth!

[@vvsriraman]

Fantastic efforts sir Very scientific and rational approach for enlightenment Warm regards Sriraman

[@jagdishramanathan2091]

in India history writing is influenced by cinema .flattering the invaders is their hallmark .divide and rule policy of British is their argument against society .Buddha had risen by condemning the Brahmins and recruits were lower castes which added number not merit andmixing ladies into Sangha brought scandalous liaison.They welcomed islam which was crime in their hatred for Hindus .these things are never told in history books .we can see the consequences in Afghanistan Pakistan Bangladesh etc whose roots are 1000 yrs back .eventually Buddhism died,sanatan survives .

[@dmajumdar2059]

Audio quality is poor. In this day and age of social media, aspects of video production should not be overlooked. Thank you.

[@Gopika-u7x]

Eye opening series

[@sasisrcm7086]

Great discussion

[@cheranjeevijayam8163]

Knowledge nicely presented

[@ChiranthanRN]

Please use a noise canceling microphone.

[@sasikumararumugam3120]

Going by all the revelations by your highly appreciated podcasts, any true indian be rest assured, that with so many onslaught from multiple fronts India remained unmoved, but forthe tragic sacrifice of a lot innocent souls.Hoeever this Gods benevolent country,created n sustained till date by real miracles will never be let down by Para bramman n all those rishis n munees ,and your revealstions have emboldened millions of Indians to lead n live in A New India because of sage Naradhas decendants as we see in you, trillions n trillions of Kudos to you, Barath madha ki Jai.

[@ashoks5317]

Dr.Shashi Tharoor in his debate with Dr.Vikram Sampath conceded to the fact that the present history was written for the sake of nation building. This means put all the unpleasant facts under the carpet by Educationist both the Minister and the Intellectual.

[@SwamiNirbhayanandaSaraswati]

I don't agree with Shashi. History should be a reflection of truth

[@Ivartabrizi999]

In retrospect, we can say that these Ashrafiyas had the last laugh by having a crypto-muslim like Nehru and his flag bearer like Maulana Abul Kalam to overwrite our history.

[@telugupadyalu...6927]

Plz continue the yagna 😊

[@kalyanvedanta]

Sir, please give a exclusive lectures on Vivekananda, Dayananda, Bankim & Sri Aurobindo about their contributions to Indian culture, literature and nationalist movements.

[@anindyadutta4013]

And today the Western Universities are investing in Sanskrit and trying to decipher our old wrintings. because their Philosophies and logics are crumbling

[@ushabhende4040]

I think lrfan Habib continued what Mohammad Habib and Nurul Hassan started. Pakistan movement started in Aligarh Muslim University but most ashraf decided to stay on in lndia. This writing came into existence to facilitate their own and the progress of their agenda. Irfan Habib is the son of the granddaughter of Badruddin Tyabji's brother Shamsuddin Tyabji. Irfan Habib l am told does not know Persian, Arabic or Turki. They thought Marxism would be a camouflage for the real agenda. R.C. Majumdar, D. C. Sircar, Nilkantha Sastry were some of the other historians.

[@prabhasharma5048]

Sir, your podcast with Ranveer reminded me of Shankaracharya.🙏.. sir, your task is harder because the opponent is confused also.. May you be blessed with all the enthusiasm to take on these people.,. Thank you..🙏🙏

[@KrishnaR-gq8wh]

Ranveer was like I don't agree with you .

[@andibandi5501]

Sandeep ji is an ocean of knowledge!!!

[@thyagtubes]

Please keep the mic near Sandeep sir, in general near the main speaker.

[@sisubk6321]

Fantastic education personally to me on writing of history. The interviewer is interrupting too often which spoils the flow. Reuqest him to keep it to minimal & be a passive listener.

[@DharmaDispatch]

@@sisubk6321 Thank you

[@maheshramchandaani336]

I don't agree.....it's a conversation and not a monologue

[@satishdas5070]

Sound is very bad

[@vandematram8205]

Excellent. Thank you.

[@DharmaDispatch]

You are welcome!

[@hara23scorp]

Hello sir, we know that you're revamping this channel. It would be great if you could reepost this video with clear audio after you've revamped. Not everyone can afford hi-quality speakers or amps. The audio in this video is quite bad along with echo like sound esp. at Sandeep Sir's end.

[@ananddeshmukh8773]

Sandeep Sir, pl read Convoluted Universe part 1 to 5 by Dolores Canon and you would be able to reconcile Bhartiya Puranic stories and epics as history.

[@krishnamurthyaiyer3022]

it is wrong to blame everything on marxist historians. Cunningham and Rawlinson were the two most important britishers who wrote Indian History, and that was what was taught in english medium schools in India. The entire Maratta history was in one chapter, but the mughals had six chapters, Delhi sultans had four chapters, and no mention of the Chola and Pallava empires, except in one paragraph. Asoka, Harsha and Kanishka got one paragraph. Even after independence, thanks to Maulana Azad, who was the education Minister, but had no clue about education, this was continued. The marxist historians came much later. The rot started years earlier.

[@solelysoul8543]

Maulana Azad rather plenty of islamists are hard core Marxist. In fact, the methods of proliferation of Islamic ideology are similar to the methods of proliferation of Marxism. The same applies to Christianity, as well. Islam and Christianity are based on belief. Belief means accepting without proof. Blind belief. They are enforced by aggression, bloodshed and deceit. They lead to ignorance, darkness and enslavement. SANATAN DHARMA is based on EXPERIENCE, SELF-REALISATION. Every aspect has been confirmed. It leads to WISDOM, KNOWLEDGE, TRUTH, ENLIGHTENMENT, ONENESS, FREEDOM. To give an analogy, SANATAN DHARMA is like an alphonso mango. Islam and Christianity are like colored and flavored, preservative laden, carbonated, synthetic mango drink. UK is a Christian country but BBC is leftist. Look at the muslim/ leftists supporters of Kejriwal.

[@technoyamraj]

Blaming on Marxist historians is necessary because they carried forward the legacy of Cunningham and others with the same intention as theirs ✌️

[@krishnamurtiganesh6902]

👏👏​@@solelysoul8543

[@coffee2331]

So you think if they never wrote our history we wouldn't be able to write it on our own? We have been keeping track of history for several thousand years. Wouldn't that makes us better at history keeping?

[@atulkanagat4034]

Good point. But we had Itihas in a circular time framework. They had a linear understanding of time in which it is important to record details you want future generations to remember (not the truth.) We remember values (like truth) while they remember events and and their heroes calling monsters like Alexander, the “Great.”

[@sunil012341]

Sir, if your purpose is to educate the masses, you must make videos in a kind of language masses understand(without much background and just the main points in a simple way).

[@Swamy_VivekAnand]

Vanaras were humans ( naras ) who lived in forests ( vanas ) harmoniously with kapis (🐒monkeys🐒)

[@uccaisiravas]

The main problem is the way history is taught in India. In the west, history is taught using primary and secondary sources.

[@Musaafir-ln6feet]

PLEASE use a good mic.

[@iuvvuiieii]

History backed by solid archeological and genetic evidence makes it what it is. Other wise it would be just a fascinating story.

[@sharad_js]

Possible to identify the host of the show?

[@benatarajan]

It's an excellent effort to educate the Indians. But too much ah, eh,uh,...fillers from the interviewer while interrupting Sandeep, disturbs the flow of Sandeep...

[@KGBhat]

Manjeshwara Govinda Pai died decades ago. I'm nearly seventy and barely remember him.He died in the sixties...

[@seemasunil9]

Great initiative.

[@chandrashekharhs9738]

History of history writing should become a new subject in the universities.

[@harishsr97]

Sir read snake in ganga breaking india 2.0

[@mayankm5200]

Very good video.

[@KGBhat]

I have seen Manjeshwara Govinda Pai

[@roshancheryakuth539]

Who is this speaker?? Why his name is not in the title

[@krishnakrishna7136]

Mr. Parag is a disturbance.

[@Kuldeep-vb8mi]

Read Carroll Quigley. He was brilliant.

[@krishnasutra6296]

Constructive criticism - it’s difficult to just listen for a long time . Use a few slides and explain your points in a way of story along those graphics .

[@algorithmcs2024]

The resources you listed are highly credible and represent a range of respected voices in Indian historiography. However, it's important to consider a few key points about the nature of historical evidence and the controversy around saffronization: ### 1. *Primary Sources as Evidence*: - *Why They Matter*: The core strength of the works by historians like Romila Thapar, Bipan Chandra, and D.N. Jha is their reliance on primary sources-original texts, inscriptions, official documents, and archaeological evidence. These primary sources are crucial because they are the closest link to the historical reality, unfiltered by later interpretations. - *Examples in Their Work*: - Romila Thapar’s work on ancient India heavily relies on inscriptions and literary sources from the period. - D.N. Jha’s work on the sacred cow uses ancient texts and historical records to challenge modern interpretations. ### 2. *The Issue of Saffronization*: - *Historical Revisionism*: Saffronization refers to the attempt to rewrite history with a particular ideological agenda, often emphasizing a Hindu-centric narrative. Critics argue that this process selectively uses or misinterprets primary sources to support specific political goals. - *Credibility*: The historians you mentioned, including Thapar and Jha, are critical of saffronization because they argue it distorts historical facts to fit a modern political agenda. Their critiques are based on rigorous analysis of primary sources and are widely respected in the academic community. ### 3. *Historians and Political Influence*: - *Political Context*: The controversy often arises from the intersection of history and politics. Historians like Irfan Habib and Romila Thapar have been accused of having leftist biases, but their work is grounded in extensive research and evidence. - *Evidence vs. Interpretation*: While interpretations can vary depending on a historian’s perspective, the credibility of their work largely depends on how faithfully they adhere to the primary sources. The critiques of saffronization are often about the selective use of evidence, rather than a rejection of certain political ideologies per se. ### 4. *True History*: - *Complexity of "Truth"*: In history, “truth” is multifaceted. The closest we come to it is through a comprehensive analysis of primary sources, balanced interpretations, and the inclusion of multiple perspectives. - *Continuous Debate*: The debate around saffronization is ongoing, reflecting the dynamic nature of historical scholarship. What is considered "true" history is constantly evolving as new evidence comes to light and as historians continue to debate and interpret that evidence. ### Conclusion: The works of historians like Romila Thapar, Bipan Chandra, and D.N. Jha are credible primarily because they are based on robust evidence, particularly primary sources. Their critiques of saffronization stem from concerns about the misuse of history for ideological purposes, which they argue distorts the understanding of India’s complex past. While their work may be interpreted as politically motivated by some, the foundation of their credibility lies in their rigorous adherence to evidence-based research.

[@vijaykannon8308]

🙏🙏🙏

[@ChitBits]

Why is the camera only focused on the speaker? Non inclusive. 😔. The philosophy through recounting history through your eyes is… be inclusive or else be perceived as dot dot dot

[@udayvbmum]

Terrible audio quality. In this day and age😢

[@AryanRex-cu7jt]

Bro whatever sir is speaking is clearly understandable ..

[@mohanadari9221]

My type viewer, fyi, the audio and the video were in symphony, at least for me. Did you check your end ?

[@paulusjeffryjosepayyappilly]

🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@rajkapoor4446]

why are so few people watching this

[@ramanathannarayanan6002]

We are made to live in a mechanical world and treated as mere resources generating profits out of our labour or talents without giving room for introspection .

[@anindyadutta4013]

Who was that Greek philosopher...name him.. this where u shy away...we will take it is just another comparison without basis

[@navaneethamvemula3864]

Poor audio quality

[@royprotocol]

Who is this guy?

[@rbnarayan3583]

My humble suggestion. The videos may be Very informative,. but..., the lecture is too descriptive ,slow, using lot of words to complete a sentence. This may be a good lecture for research students in history, but for commoners like us, it is difficult to hold the attention . Kindly make the points sharp and precise. Otherwise we loose track of the subject.

[@user-xyz766-aBclmpq]

Bad audio

[@sasikumararumugam3120]

Lets also seeto it that we are here not to betaken for a ride any more,lets all enter in to action as Baradhians n see to it that we are not political slaves to any Partys rather they are to serve us properly,n we have to instill in them a fear of our united powr n tell them to do theit job of serving us prpperly for which we elect n install them after taking solomnised oath. They should also never be allowed to transgress in to our Domain of religion, education ,cultural practicesn last but leastour united co existence s on all fronts,can we not do it, dure we can nee should, letstry n see what happens.

[@DipakBose-bq1vv]

Barfukan the Ahom hero was a Chinese as the Ahoms came from China. He defeated Ram Sinha of the Mughal army. How can he be our hero? Prithudev, the king of Pragyotish defeated Baktier Khilji and because of him Turks could not occupy North east India.

[@SN-xo3vv]

Borfukan meant viceroy of territories . It was not the name of any king. The original Ahoms were from Thai not China. However they adopted Hindu Tradition and culture though formal initiation was only in 1640s. The king who valiantly fought the Mughals was Pratap Singha.Then there were others Jayadwaj Singha Gadadhar Singha and so on who were responsible for defeat of Shahjahan Aurangazeb etc.

[@eshwarswaminathan3031]

Communist should be solving problems in hindu religion if any not anti hindu religion

[@ranabhumi.2024]

Comment about Hanuman as monkey and forcibly interpreting it as philosophically, just shows speakers shallowness about Hindu spirituality. He needs to learn this area under a good guide.

[@ashokbraroo8845]

❤It is truly the motive of Gandhi /Nehru nexus who by their acts unfolded now have been sworn enemies of Hindus right from Mopllah massacre ❤

[@edres7563]

We need to stop using foreign outsider's words, concepts and paradigm, to describe ourselves, because our identity, our culture, and even consciousness is totally different from the current dominant world view, languages and concepts, which stems from the Judao-Christian-Islamo Western paradigm and consicoisness, which is very recent in terms of world history (approx 3000 yrs), whereas we the so called 'pagans' are the people who existed long before them in many different cultures and forms, all over the world, for countless millennia. Instead of India/Indian - Bharat/Bharatiya Instead of Hindism - Dharma which is the umbrella descriptive term under which all the pluralist spiritual and earthly philosphies and traditions come under, whether in the south or the north of india, or whether inside modern day Bharat, or beyond its borders in Akhand Bharat, and beyond throughout the rest of the world. Using these terms, can also unite the whole of Bharat as a diverse pluralistic civilisation, and act as an antedote that will dissolve the poisionous north south divide once and for all for good. It is my observation that, these divisions are still persisting and causing damage to our unity and strength, becasue we are still using the invaders terms and concepts to describe ourselves and our culture and traditions, ie we are still seeing ourselves through the invader's divide and rule strategy and lens. We need to use our privilidged position as the only surviving and powerful ancient dharmic civilisation, to help people in other parts of the world to help them reawaken, revive and reconnect with THEIR indigenous dharmic expressions, which was suppressed or destroyed by invaders and colonisers. If we go around the world and impose or influence people into becoming like us, and everyone starts adopting our version of dharma (which is merely one of many that grew out of OUR personal experiences in OUR part of the world) at the expense of others who also suffered like us, forgetting their own ancestral traditions, then we risk becoming just like the abrahamic people, who could not comprehend that other people have their own native knowledge and accumulated wisdom and philosophies. We need to SHARE knowledge, and help each other rediscover and reawaken everyone's indigenous knowledge systems, ancestral traditions and wisdom all over the world. I truly believe that Bharat has the potential to become the great leader in leading the path to a better world, based on long suppressed ancient people waking up, finding the confidence to decolonise and taking their place in the heart of the world leadership once again, after 5000 years of abrahamic global hegemony, which has cause so much bloodshed and tyranny as well as ignorance and loss for so many. This time the world has a chance to know peace and harmony and ONeness, after many millenia of division and hate. We have to be mindful that we do not fall into the trap of ego in our new found self confidence and taking on the mindsets and behaviour of those who cause so much trouble in the world. We HAVE to do better than those who hurt and oppressed us and every ancient people around the world, and who did so much damage to the earth as well. We have the ancient wisdom and knowledge to do everything better than it has been done before, whether it is compassion, justice, culture, family, law, education, society, military, science, business, trade, international relations and so on....We must do everything in harmony with divine and sacred universal principles, that are imbued with Truth, Justice, Order, Balance, Harmony, Reciprocity, Compassion and so on. Only then, can we the people heal, and so can our planet.

[@DrSakharamGawhane]

All Moghal rulers and Britishers as well congress destroyed our real history and Sanatan culture

[@CanterBuddy2323]

what were you doing on the beef promoter beerbiceps show ??. he made a roast out of you , what were you thinking when you went for that podcaster show. 🤣. just because big right people go , does not mean you follow

[@Ravi9A]

had to be done.

[@bellacchu]

On the contrary it was Ranveer who was shaken and out of depth. It was a good show despite being an uncomfortable watch.

[@AA13494]

look at the comment section and yule know who got roasted. overwhelming support for sandeepji

[@AA13494]

exactly. I loved when Sandeepji said that, muslims are violent bcz their fundamentals are violent. this what ex-muslims have been saying.Ranveer tried to defend it , but failed. nobody bought his reasoning, can see in the comments.its difficult to manipulate hindus now.@@bellacchu

[@jatutube123]

Well exposed Al Taqiya !

[@subhasisghosh66]

I had to cross over 55 mins on this video to hear first mention about Marxist historians. If you genuinely want people to hear what you put up, you need to be a lot sharper and concise. This just too rambling and slow.

[@nila679303]

Disagree. I loved this pace and delve into context. It shows the presenters are not interested in spit and run narrative building, they meticulous in their approach 🙏🙏

[@treeoflife666]

All problems of man in these many centuries come in truth from the active presence of his sworn enemy, namely, Jesus, in his midst in the guise of his friend and savior. Luke 12:49-51: “It is fire that I (Jesus) have come to spread over the earth, and what better wish can I (Jesus) have than that it should be kindled? … …, and how DISTRESSED I (Jesus) am for its accomplishment! Do you think that I (Jesus) have come to bring PEACE on the earth? No, believe me, I (Jesus) have come to bring dissension” (religious non-conformity). Only Devil can say these things! Luke 6:27: “And now I (Jesus) say to you who are listening to me, Love your enemies.” But the same Jesus says just the contrary at Luke 19:27: “Now bring me the enemies who didn’t want me to be their king. Slaughter them in front of me.” A person who wants his own enemies to be unerringly killed has no right to ask others to love their enemy! In John 6:51 Jesus said: “The bread that I will give him is my flesh, which I give so that the world may live.” But when someone actually takes the bread, it is Satan that enters into him. “So he took a piece of bread, dipped it, and gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. AS SOON AS JUDAS TOOK THE BREAD, SATAN ENTERED INTO HIM” (John 13:26-27). Instead of Jesus, Satan drops in when a person actually receives the bread given to him by Jesus. This so happens for jesus and satan are one and the same! Jesus said in Matthew 5.9 “Peacemakers will be called sons of god” And the same Jesus says in the same Matthew 10:34 “I came NOT to bring PEACE but division and trouble.” Jesus himself says in Mark 3:24-25 ‘a nation divided will fall apart’ and 'a family divided will ruin' and knowing this very well the same Jesus then says i am here to divide families and nations - therefore Jesus is truly a ruiner! Jesus says “Anyone who comes to me must hate his father and mother. He must hate his wife and children. He must hate his brothers and sisters. And he must hate even his own life. Unless he does, he can't be my disciple.” (Luke 14:26) This proves Jesus is neither man nor god but embodiment of all evil! For more on this theme please visit our webpage. www.identitypublishers.org

[@abirsen5146]

How much fascination you guys have with Mughols and yet totally disregarded today's political scenarios totally put forward your agendas. Fascination with past and try to manipulate it as per own interest, just using gibberishes. Does any of you words look logical. Kabhi khud ka statements sun liya karo bhai log....

[@sanjivgupta1418]

What are you talking ? At least have some coherence of thoughts. Why don't you start doing some serious study ?

[@sanjivgupta1418]

What are you talking ? At least have some coherence of thoughts. Why don't you start doing some serious study ?

[@abirsen5146]

If those historian had agendas so do you? So why one took your views as 100%true history and their history as totally false?!?

[@VinayKumarRai9]

The issue is not that there's an agenda; the issue is whether the agenda is supported by principle, evidence, and/or logic. On that basis, yes: One side generally is presenting the truth while the other side is generally presenting falsehoods.

[@abirsen5146]

@@VinayKumarRai9 so how would you know which side is what?

[@VinayKumarRai9]

@@abirsen5146That's a good question. Do your homework: If it's worth having or worth doing, it's worth effort, pain, and difficulty, to paraphrase Theodore Roosevelt. Look at the big picture. Read both sides. Focus on what the experts are saying; yes, some of them are biased, but at least you get the best arguments each side has to offer. And if one side is mostly resorting to rhetoric, cherry picking, presenting half-truths, misrepresenting the facts, or outrightly lying --- as in this case -- it's a good bet they don't have much of a leg to stand on. Spend enough time doing all this, with an open mind, and you begin to get a sense of the truth: The 'Marxist historians' are more Marxists, less historians.

[@FigthAGAINSTSCOIALISM]

Truth. Because their rewriting of history of not just European history. But it seems everyone history is for their political agenda. Marxist distort history using contradictions. They will happily blame other people as killers. But praise Lenin and Stalin who commited mass murder.

[@mehfil-e-ghazal786]

Can you guys tell before britishers do you people have the sense of history. You guys always blame marxist historians

[@hindurashtra63]

There are 2 Historical Epis in Indian Culture - They are called Ramayana and Mahabharata. They describe all the information about India CIvilization in History. Another source of histoiry were Indian Universities like Nalanda, Vikramasheela, Taxilla. It was sadi Nalanda was 11 Storeies high Building hich held 2 Million Scrolls. This is preservation of Hisotry.

[@SN-xo3vv]

Bharath has a history and civilization that goes back several thousands of years. It did not begin in 1AD as Marxist historians would like us to believe. There are definite proofs of the existence only it has been kept away from us in order to distort our history. Excavations and carbon dating have proved the age of several artifacts obtained. These prove the existence of Bharath long before the advent of Abrahamic faiths. For instance, Keeladi excavation near Madurai has shown the existence of an educated civilization with a written language 5000 years ago. The Royal family of Ayodhya can trace their origins to almost 75 generations. they Had submitted that evidence in SC when the then CJI asked jokingly if descendents of Ram existed. Similarly our ancient texts describe the exact time scale of various happenings in the past nearly accurately. It is unfortunate that Sanskrit was not being taught as a language to us after 1800 . That is the reason why we have not been aware of these issues.

[@VikasDhavaria]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@TheOggy1988]

A Godi youtuber. You are an appropriate youtuber like godi media, nothing else.

[@movie_mania62]

jab kuch samajh me na aaye to godi media kehdo. cool lagenge 😅👎

[@TheOggy1988]

@@movie_mania62 🤣🤣🤣 WhatsApp history

[@vismayraje1222]

When you can't put your points in logical manner and refute his narrative, all you do is call him Godi youtuber. Surely you seem to be a madarsa chap embicile...

[@akshaykulkarni5691]

Disprove Karo. Judge nahi.

[@believeinkarma939]

​@@TheOggy1988 kya Gandhi ji Mahatma the?? Tujhe apna answer khud mil jaayega.. tu log kis ideology ko follow karta hai.. Pehli baat Congress ki vajah se RSS aur BJP wajood mein aayi hai.. Agar unhone itne blunder nahi kiye hote toh RSS kabhi existence mein nahi aati.. Agar tu Congress aur bollywood ko ek chashme se dekhega.. toh tujhe pata chal jayega.. ki voh hinduon ka brainwash kar rahe the.. congress ne phle first education minister kissi muslim ko banaya tha.. usne fir Hindi ki books mein Urdu word ghussaye.. fir bollywood jisne hinduon ko nicha dikhaya.. Tu yeh words bata sakta hai ki yeh Hindi ke hai ya nahi.. kitaab, makkaar, pyaar in words ko search kar liyo.. teri baato se lag raha hai ki secular hai.. Tu Jake heated deabtes, Ex-muslim Sameer,sahil Inka channel dekh.. Pehli baat jayeda tar Indian muslims.. Islam ko India se uppar mante hai.. jab tym aayega.. voh apna rang dikhayenge..😂😂 Aur rahi teri baat tu kabhi padhta nahi hai.. tujhe joh samne parosa jata hai.. wohi Maan leta hai.. Bro hinduon ka dushman hindu hi hai.. yeh Islam Bharat mein tum jaise secular logo ki wajah se aaya hai.. kuch paiso ke apne Desh ko bech dete hai..

[@HumanBeing-jj3mc]

Ahoms themselves were "outsiders". Read about Whom Dynasty more.

[@AA13494]

yes. bt they accepted sanatan Dharma since it was the most prevalent. indian history is about assimilation. so thats not an issue

[@aprameya6623]

Thanks!

[@DharmaDispatch]

Thank YOU for the generosity! It is really valued! :)