Massive Black Holes May Be Controlled by Magnetic Fields After All

Get a Wonderful Person Tee: teespring.com/...
More cool designs are on Amazon: amzn.to/3QFIrFX
Alternatively, PayPal donations can be sent here: paypal.me/whatd...
Hello and welcome! My name is Anton and in this video, we will talk about formation of massive black holes
Links:
arxiv.org/abs/...
www.caltech.ed...
Previous videos: • What Are These? Bizarr...
• Incredible Hubble Imag...
• Mysterious Herbig-Haro...
#blackhole #astrophysics #universe
0:00 Black hole formation is more surprising than believed
1:01 How this connects to JWST mysteries
2:20 Issues with simulations
3:30 New simulations and discoveries
5:30 What this means and why it's important
7:20 Similarity to other phenomena
Support this channel on Patreon to help me make this a full time job:
/ whatdamath
Bitcoin/Ethereum to spare? Donate them here to help this channel grow!
bc1qnkl3nk0zt7w0xzrgur9pnkcduj7a3xxllcn7d4
or ETH: 0x60f088B10b03115405d313f964BeA93eF0Bd3DbF
Space Engine is available for free here: spaceengine.org
Enjoy and please subscribe.
Twitter: / whatdamath
Facebook: / whatdamath
Twitch: / whatdamath
The hardware used to record these videos:
New Camera: amzn.to/34DUUlv
CPU: amzn.to/2LZFQCJ
Video Card: amzn.to/2M1W26C
Motherboard: amzn.to/2JYGiQQ
RAM: amzn.to/2Mwy2t4
PSU: amzn.to/2LZcrIH
Case: amzn.to/2MwJZz4
Microphone: amzn.to/2t5jTv0
Mixer: amzn.to/2JOL0oF
Recording and Editing: amzn.to/2LX6uvU
Some of the above are affiliate links, meaning I would get a (very small) percentage of the price paid.
Thank you to all Patreon supporters of this channel
Special thanks also goes to all the wonderful supporters of the channel through KZbin Memberships
Credit:
Caltech/Phil Hopkins • Cosmic Simulation Reve...
ESO/L. Calçada/M. Kornmesser
Licenses used:
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...
creativecommon...

[@outlawbillionairez9780]

If you sprinkle iron filings around a black hole, you can see the magnetic field lines. Learned that in school.

[@Dlweta57]

Lol

[@Xanderbelle]

But you need a big piece of card to sprinkle on

[@darylbrown8834]

Watch Ken Wheeler magnetism ' then apply that knowledge to the universe.

[@ianstopher9111]

@@darylbrown8834 Ken Wheeler, that well-known tinfoil guy?

[@mavrosyvannah]

Did the teacher disappear during the demonstration?

[@jamesphillips2285]

Magnetic fields dominating within 0.3ly seems to solve the "final parsec" problem as well.

[@AM-uw3gp]

That actually does sound plausible hopefully someone does a study on this

[@nzuckman]

@@jamesphillips2285 that's an interesting idea, but it would only resolve the situation for black holes with accretion disks. The trouble remains for black holes that aren't actively feeding...

[@jumboegg5845]

Plasma is not gas, it is a different state of matter : solid, liquid, gas, plasma. Plasma has electrons stripped from the atom, which in the case of hydrogen plasma, is simply protons. Hard to imagine what all of the free electrons are doing, but if they are swirling around en mass, then surely it generates an magnetic field.

[@Weaseldog2001]

The electrons are there too, zipping between protons. They are still attracted to the proton's charge.

[@whendarknessfalls6969]

Hopefully everyone here passed elementary science and knows that😅

[@jumboegg5845]

@@whendarknessfalls6969 Why is it then that dense hydrogen plasma is not often talked about as simply a plasma of protons? The hydrogen atom is just a proton.

[@jumboegg5845]

@@Weaseldog2001 But what hapens in a hot dense plasma of protons (hydrogen)?

[@Weaseldog2001]

​@@jumboegg5845protons repel each other Electrons repel each other. But protons and electrons attract. So protons and electrons tend to stay in the same vicinity. But as you pointed out, the electrons are not bound to the protons in shells.

[@TheRotnflesh]

Thank you, Anton! Black holes have magnetic fields. Black holes also spin, generating galactic current sheets (similar to heliospheric current sheets). Our central massive black hole is 4.9 million solar masses and spins at almost the speed of light (0.84-0.96% of C). This speed is SO INSANELY fast compared to observed galactic cores that it may have relativistic effects not visible in local or even distant galaxies. We have a HUGE gap in our knowledge of cosmic forces; high-scale electromagnetic effects can produce gravitational proxies because our planet is an onion of electromagnetic layers, bound within the electromagnetic sheath of our star, cocooned within the Radcliffe waves of the galactic current sheet. It isn't that gravity is wrong; its that it is defined only by its effect and not its process; saying 'tidal distortion on the down-curve of spacetime ripples' or similar speak is too simple and misdirective. We are on the cusp for proper definition and, thus, depth of understanding.

[@emmanuelweinman9673]

Amen. We got this. As long as we continue to have different fields of knowledge collaborate with each other, we will attain a better view of the mysterious structure of the universe. Scientists just need to keep their minds open… Same with everyone 🙏🏼

[@Bob-of-Zoid]

With much of what you are speaking of not yet confirmed or even evident, you sure say it in a factual way, which is not good science ethics. Hypotheses need to be treated and referred to as such, and not like facts, laws or theories! "generating galactic current sheets" is very vague if you understand the word current, and leave out the involved forces. One can have current of light, electricity, magnetism, and even in mechanical energy, like sound current through masses... because current just means flow, but is most commonly known related to electrical current, and the first thing that popped in my mind for your using the terms "galactic current sheets" (I never heard of such a thing at all) was "The electric universe" pseudo science weirdo's and cons are peddling! What else can you define gravity as than it's effect, if you don't know it's exact cause? The word gravity as well as the law of gravity preceded Einsteins theory of general relativity, and it's cause is still not fully understood, and so far unexplainable, and why we are looking for the answer in quantum physics, which should answer a lot of questions, and reveal even more new questions needing answers!

[@robertsteele474]

@@Bob-of-Zoid You don't believe in "settled science".😉

[@Bob-of-Zoid]

@@robertsteele474 Settled in the minds of the confused and Dunning Kruger effected! There is no "settled science", that would be RELIGION by doctrine, and as unsettled as it gets by believers, because every believer has their very own interpretation of doctrine, and therefore their very own religion! Science never settles on anything, and always keeps probing for new information to supplement our current best understanding, and it's why the very best of our knowledge and understanding various things are called "Scientific theory" as opposed to just plain theory" and not "Absolute truths", or "Irrefutable" which claims of gods and supernatural events are sold as.

[@jameseproctorpmp]

@@TheRotnflesh exactly. The idea of a schwarschild is not based upon reality because all black holes have spin, there are not any stationary black holes

[@doomguy1001]

Wonderful person: “How does this work?” Colonel O’Neill: “MAGNETS!”

[@neverlistentome]

" I ask you, what could possibly be happening in my *eye* that would explain this? "

[@fariesz6786]

what does Star Gate have to do with this? 0.o

[@upsguppy520]

electricity causes magnetism nothing else

[@jamesdalton2014]

@@fariesz6786 You have obviously either never watched Stargate SG-1 or you weren't paying attention when you did. The Stargate system relied on black holes and super-massive stars to work, due to their massive magnetic fields. The Stargate itself also relied on magnets to generate the initial connection to the wormholes. It turns out Col. O'Neill was a genius who just didn't know exactly how much he knew. [Yes, I'm aware the show is fictional but, the producers used science consultants to make the writing sound credible. That's what distinguishes "science fiction" from "space fantasy" - the writing has to be something a bit more credible than "and then... magic".]

[@Bob-of-Zoid]

I always use smoke and mirrors!🤓 They put on a better show!😁

[@skylilly1]

Hello wonderful Anton!

[@volcaniicash6485]

Anton sending you love man

[@pauljs75]

At some point they'll find the gravito-electric effect is a thing when both fields are present in relation to masses with differing charges relative to each other. (Something not exactly easy to reproduce in the lab because gravity is so weak.) Most of that will be expressed as a torsion or rotational effect and the ability to transfer angular momentum as a way of preserving energy in a bound system, and that tidally-locked bodies will be somewhat rarer than initially presumed.

[@gravitonthongs1363]

@@pauljs75 at some point you will stop trying to tell the universe how to behave.

[@johncloptop1585]

That makes a Magnetar look like a refrigerator magnet. 😳

[@andrewepp6763]

Magnets are so freaking awesome!!

[@darylbrown8834]

Check out Ken Wheeler magnetism' then apply that knowledge to the universe.

[@A_Stereotypical_Heretic]

No ​@@darylbrown8834

[@Savagedominator]

I was attracted to this response

[@A_Stereotypical_Heretic]

@@darylbrown8834 no

[@eggnog52]

How do they work??

[@yomogami4561]

thanks for the information anton

[@ZumaZoom07]

Makes sense that it's a universal phenomenon. Everything scales

[@stevenkarnisky411]

When we get to go up close to these black holes, we had best not assemble our spaceships with nails. Now we know what attracts us to black holes. Thank you for this update, Anton!

[@two_tier_gary_rumain]

Make them out of foam.

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

"Now we know what attracts us to black holes." We already knew that, it's gravity. Yes, magnetism also plays a role, but gravity still is the dominant force there. The magnetic fields stabilize the accretion disc, but they are not what is actually pulling you in.

[@ElectricalExistence]

There is no such thing as a black hole. When yall finally figure his out you can join the smart kids in the electric universe.

[@ElectricalExistence]

@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 youre wrong. Magentism is the dominant force. "Gravity" as described by newton does not exist. What we call gravity is basically akin to static electricity.

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

@@ElectricalExistence The known, well-studied properts of magnetism do _not_ fit the observations of gravity. Magnetic forces fall off with the inverse fourth power of distance and depend on the orientation of the magnets to each other. Gravitational forces fall off with the inverse second power of distance and do not depend on the orientation of bodies to each other. So no, magnetism can _not_ explain the observed effects which are usually attributed to gravity. So you are trivially wrong. "What we call gravity is basically akin to static electricity." Make up your mind. Is it magnetism or electricity? You _do_ know that these two are _not_ the same - don't you? :D The known, well-studied properts of static electricity do _not_ fit the observations of gravity. Electric forces can be repulsive or attractive, whereas gravity is always attractive. So no, static electricity can _not_ explain the observed effects which are usually attributed to gravity. So you are trivially wrong, yet again, no matter if you appeal to magnetism or to static electricity. And BTW: You should _know_ all these facts. This is at best high school physics, I'd even say grade school physics.

[@newbiex11]

Very interesting field research field for new students I'am waiting for more studies like this 👏👏👏

[@whendarknessfalls6969]

Lol literally impossible, but okay

[@andrewmurray6352]

Just read up on plasma cosmology.

[@newbiex11]

@@andrewmurray6352 I am seeing a lot of research form Plank telescope about the magnetic field in the galaxy, this type of research are gaining force.

[@rogerdudra178]

Greetings from the BIG SKY of Montana.

[@subjectkgb9394]

Anton, I enjoy listening to you explain everything to do with space and science. Your delivery is wonderful and you make it easy for my primitive monkey brain to feel like it’s understand what’s going on. I appreciate you.

[@Sumpydumpert]

Great video!!

[@iamjacksyoutube5375]

Well obviously, that's what makes Magneto one of the most powerful beings of any Mythos

[@jameseproctorpmp]

My thoughts on super massive black holes are that they develop initially from the direct collapse of gas clouds and that it is the super massive black holes which start the process for galactic growth. No other way in such a short period of time. That’s why pretty much every galaxy has a super massive black hole in the middle of it.

[@lucasj6147]

yeah im a fan of DC blackholes, if thats not the case im a fan of bubble universes that join our universe

[@michaelstiller2282]

Well what your proposing. Has to factor in cosmic hyper inflation. Which was proposed as a way to prevent super massive black holes from forming and collapsing the universe. Its proof is, we are here. That's the scientific reason. Had it not occurred we would not be here. So the formation of black holes needs to be very slow. And they need to be far apart from one another. The great attractor. Which guides our locat cluster. Shows you, blacks holes which are light years apart. still feel the influence of the other galaxies. And cluster together. When galaxy cluster were discovered. It was a problem for cosmology. Because it wasn't predict. And they thought the distances were far enough apart. That they couldn't cluster. And so it brought about ideas like. The primordial cosmic soup of hyper inflation wasn't uniform. And there were denser areas. They still trying to explain that. Because it causes other problems for the Big bang.

[@jameseproctorpmp]

@@michaelstiller2282 good points Michael. We know the universe was in this much denser state and the CMB does show some areas denser than others although it’s mostly uniform. We just know that everything with mass warps space time (gravity) and so what I surmise is that in the early Universe we have these clumps of gas clouds that will just collapse into a black hole. Obviously the universe was expanding etc. I also think it’s possible that you could have had the gas clouds do both the direct collapse into black holes and the stellar formation. It just seems if the universe is 13.8 billion years old, there’s not enough time for these supermassive black holes to grow such a large size just from its eating other stars and colliding with other galaxies. They already had a large size in the early universe so that’s why I speculate we had super massive black holes result from direct collapse of gas clouds in the early universe and that galaxies might form based upon the super massive black hole first and then the stars later. We know that these early black holes would be very active and this would spur the growth of stars

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

@@michaelstiller2282 "Has to factor in cosmic hyper inflation. Which was proposed as a way to prevent super massive black holes from forming and collapsing the universe." No, inflation was _not_ invented for that purpose. Where did you get that idea from??? "The great attractor. Which guides our locat cluster. Shows you, blacks holes which are light years apart. still feel the influence of the other galaxies. And cluster together. " Huh? The great attractor is a supercluster of galaxies; clustering of galaxies has almost nothing to do with black holes. "When galaxy cluster were discovered. It was a problem for cosmology. Because it wasn't predict." Wrong again, this _was_ predicted! Where did you get all these wrong ideas from?!? "And so it brought about ideas like. The primordial cosmic soup of hyper inflation wasn't uniform. And there were denser areas." That was clear right from the start, that wasn't added only as an afterthought!

[@gravitonthongs1363]

@@michaelstiller2282decent points, but inflation preventing universal collapse doesn’t negate density fluctuations from BAO’s. Until we understand DM …early formation is hard to model.

[@mmascientific]

This is heading in the right direction...great piece 👏

[@DigitaIVortex]

Don’t tell Terrence Howard!

[@Johnny_Appleweed]

He's already designed some new magnetic drones that function on the same principle, and like fractals, and stuff.

[@Yellowsupercar420]

What does this have to do with anything?

[@sideeggunnecessary]

​@@Yellowsupercar420 mad? 😂

[@800mpro]

6:22 - 6:30 This is similar to one of the things Terrence mentions.

[@leonard2720]

Exactly what I was thinking !!!

[@Sylar-451]

Never stop that beautiful smile and wave goodbye Anton! ❤️

[@cyarutchiii]

Interesting and well explained as always :)

[@matthewabln6989]

The most surprising part is that I already thought that was occurring.

[@desidog11]

Which also mean beings advanced enouch can figure out a way to control black holes through magnetism, amazing power source imagine !

[@m786-x2n]

Thanks

[@MCsCreations]

Very interesting indeed. And it does make sense...

[@ruperterskin2117]

Appreciate ya. Thanks for sharing.

[@darcyedmonds8848]

Electricity induces magnetism. 🤔😁❤

[@DomingosCJM]

Electricity and magnetism are the same phenomena.

[@darylbrown8834]

Two sides of the same coin. Different modalities or modes (forms) like water has different modalities of solid, liquid,gas for example.

[@esecallum]

And 😮 Vice versa too

[@rawmilkmike]

@@DomingosCJM That's ridiculous. How would you do the math? Tell that to the guy who just got hit by lightning.

[@rawmilkmike]

@darylbrown8834 They're not modalities. You are naming forms. An electrical current does not turn into a magnetic field. An electric current is the movement of particles. It's what we use for welding. A magnetic field is what lifts a car at the scrapyard. With a coil of wire, you can turn one into the other. They are two simultaneous effects. But they are definitely not the same thing. They have different names because we need to differentiate one from the other. They are measured with different instruments. Because they have different properties. If you give the current a frequency, it will have additional properties.

[@docholiday8029]

Anton, I know you are struggling. Hang in there. You are loved.

[@DaveWasThereMan]

Struggling with guilt of being a useless fraud.

[@LoveYourself-my9nz]

🙄​@@DaveWasThereMan

[@stvybaby]

So much to learn. So little time.

[@fishmcfly7070]

Much love Anton :)

[@scott-hr3hd]

Those magnetic lines around black holes remind me of weather pattern around hurricanes.

[@Nobody0117]

Hurricanes are probably shaped by electromagnetic forces so maybe that's why

[@nzuckman]

​@@Nobody0117 their shape comes first and foremost from the Coriolis force. That's why they spin in opposite directions in the north and south hemispheres.

[@Nobody0117]

@@nzuckman Thank you for the information What I was trying to say is that they are formed because the field of the planet gets disturbed due to multiple reasons

[@nzuckman]

@@Nobody0117 of course! Don't get me wrong though, I think Earth's electromagnetic field plays an underappreciated role in weather systems in general :)

[@nadahere]

There are no 'magnetic lines' That's just a visual aid! Kapish?

[@jimcurtis9052]

Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. ✌️☺️

[@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time]

Could be the same with galaxies, no need for dark matter? Is it logical that the plasma of Black Holes and galaxies would be based on the same physics?

[@frankowalker4662]

I knew it, that confirms everything I've thought for years..... Anton is a wonderful person !

[@MyraSeavy]

Awesome as usual Anton! 😊❤

[@DaveWasThereMan]

Fake fraud science

[@SpaceG95]

I'm no scientist, but I've learned a bit from you and other channels. Many scientists have wondered why they don't see magnetic dipoles. Could they be the precursor to the black holes described here 🤔

[@jonnyueland7790]

We told you so! Time to look up Birkeland and Alfven theories.

[@AceSpadeThePikachu]

The influence of electromagnetism on the largest scales of the cosmos as long been overlooked. It's good to see it's finally being factored in to our models.

[@gravitonthongs1363]

It hasn’t been overlooked. A grifter just told you that and you gullibility believed it.

[@davidh.4944]

Not really. It's simple Occam's Razor-not to multiply entities unnecessarily. Previous observations did not show evidence of EM or require it in the models that descended from them. But with increased resolution, those theories became untenable. And so we expand the scope of our suppositions ... but only as much as needed, when it is needed.

[@ThePowerLover]

@@davidh.4944 It Is not that simple, there is always bias. UE people fall into the same trap as "Relativistic people", falling into wishful thinking regarding the simplicity of the description of the model of the world, "Relativistic people" want to explain all in cosmic scales with gravity, and UE people want to explain everything in terms of "electricity".

[@hurmzz]

Electric universe people are about to go even more nuts..

[@gravitonthongs1363]

Like they do every time electromagnetism is mentioned 🙄

[@ThePowerLover]

@@gravitonthongs1363 They are like a strawmen for "plasma cosmology".

[@Space30MINUTES]

Born too late to explore the world. Born to early to explore universe. Born just in time to appreciate pictures of cool, faraway rocks.

[@A_Stereotypical_Heretic]

We still have the ocean... 🤷

[@deathbydeviceable]

Wouldn't that prove to you we came from dust no?

[@A_Stereotypical_Heretic]

@@deathbydeviceable of course we came from dust, whether by some creation story or the universe bringing us forth itself, in both cases we came from dust and shall return to it.

[@ImOverEveryone]

Hello wonderful told you so... This is Rachelle

[@whattheflyingfuck...]

get over yourself now

[@A_Stereotypical_Heretic]

Did you ever live in Tennessee? Maybe when you were like 13?

[@ImOverEveryone]

@@A_Stereotypical_Heretic nope. One state I barely been to. Visited Chattanooga in 2012-13.. drove thru a small slice of it when I was 10 on a road trip... That's my TN experience

[@jnclouddragon9648]

Anton Can you post a link to the study paper please?

[@mNag]

I love videos like this. Really feels like we're cracking the egg rather than just opening a can of worms.

[@DaveWasThereMan]

It's nonsense.

[@calvingrondahl1011]

Science is honest or it is not science, being wrong is only a problem if you lie about it.

[@Kerrsartisticgifts]

So, is this what the Electric Universe theory says, too?

[@gravitonthongs1363]

They don’t even believe in black holes lol

[@WellSwolen69]

Odd, I always saw matter as compressed energy. Perhaps the matter is leaking back into energy from spinning too fast

[@TheMemesofDestruction]

5:07 - Obligatory, "It's OVER 9,000!" Cheers🍻 ^.^

[@FarmerDrew]

"F****** magnets, how do they work?" - Violent Jay

[@darylbrown8834]

Watch Ken Wheeler or Theoria Apophasis magnetism then apply that knowledge to the universe.

[@MUSHROOM7981]

Whoop! whoop!

[@JehovahsaysNetworth]

I’m glad to see that science is paying attention to electromagnetic intelligence all around our intelligence

[@gravitonthongs1363]

“Electromagnetic Intelligence” 😂

[@rozzgrey801]

@@gravitonthongs1363 It's different from gravity intelligence, which is really heavily intellectual.

[@gravitonthongs1363]

@@rozzgrey801try science out

[@Nobody0117]

​@@gravitonthongs1363He might be referring to the wild idea that the universe is alive. Maybe I'm wrong though

[@duncanluciak5516]

​@@Nobody0117How would one of our mitochondria communicate with us? Probably understating the difference in scale by a few orders, but that's how strange it would be.

[@kakhipudhi]

If a black holes gravity is able to partially capture photons into temp. orbits, the photon still exists under known physical laws. If an electron moving through a circular loop produces a magnetic field, what can be produced by a photon moving in a circular loop at c?

[@Alondro77]

Cool, now to build a ship to travel into a black hole! I think I'll call it... the Cygnus. I anticipate no issues whatsoever... unless the crew gets antsy... well, I'm sure I can deal with their unwillingness when the time comes! Maximillian, we have work to do... >:}

[@rxbracho]

I have said before, you have to distinguish between whole-making forces that follow negentropy and whole-dispersing forces that follow entropy. In the former, we have gravity and magnetism.

[@jam9309]

Electro magnetism controls everything

[@gravitonthongs1363]

…Except the stuff that is not electromagnetism

[@jamesdalton2014]

Por que no los dos?

[@mmascientific]

All matter is electric magnetic ​@@gravitonthongs1363

[@gravitonthongs1363]

@@mmascientificNeutrinos say hello 👋

[@drfill9210]

Perhaps spiral galaxies are evaporating toroidal structures

[@lenseay7645]

23 light years!?! 😳 Major Role 🫡

[@OskarHalldor-q9o]

your videos are really beautiful, pls make them longer😝😝

[@terrynewberg5732]

Time to revisit the Electric Universe, Anton.

[@Johnny_Appleweed]

I read that, but I also read some critique of it that seemed pretty convincing. I'd be curious to see if anyone has designed experiments to test some of those challenges to the theory by now

[@davidh.4944]

The EU is pseudoscience drivel powered by confirmation bias. You cranks latch leechlike on to any observation that even _seems_ to support your views, while ignoring the mountains of evidence against it. I knew as soon as I saw the title exactly what I would find in the comments.

[@gravitonthongs1363]

Still pseudoscience

[@ThePowerLover]

Why not plasma cosmology.

[@ThePowerLover]

@@gravitonthongs1363 Still? Tell us you don't know what pseudoscience is without telling it "directly". Spoiler: Pseudoscience cannot become science even with evidence and hypothesis that "back it up", because pseudoscience is something that is not science but is presented as science, and science is a method.

[@AisleEpe-oz8kf]

well done. thanks

[@darylbrown8834]

4:44' Looks like a Van Gough! Galactic night.✨

[@thetroll1247]

Magnetic attraction and harmonic frequency makes up everything.

[@neohermitist]

So can you have magnetism without electric current in plasma?

[@paulblase3955]

Depends on what is driving the fields. These “gasses” are plasma.

[@BobWidlefish]

Magic. Don’t ask questions or you might look into the electric aspects of the universe.

[@vapormissile]

❤ welcome

[@jellymop]

Plasma by its nature is charged and if it’s spinning it’s moving. I guess it’s technically a current and therefore produces magnetic fields. The plasma and dust filaments between galaxy clusters carry charge and current as well I think.

[@gravitonthongs1363]

I recommend learning about electromagnetism. Preferably from reputable sources to avoid EU misinformation.

[@davidcampos1463]

Wait a minute, now you have to have lighting bolts coming out of "Big Bang."

[@HEXiT_]

im honestly stunned they left magnetism out of there simulations thinking it was of little consequence. all the physical matter we can see is effected by electro magnetism to some degree. yet.. nope. but the orbit of the electron looks like a galactic core... nope. still no reason to add it.. are you sure.. corse im sure im the science ???.. seriously these sims cost millions to make and run and they left out the basics?... FIRE THAT GUY!...

[@joelhungerford8388]

Another case of ego and arrogance blackholeing intelligence

[@Nobody0117]

Its not stupidity its purposeful misdirection

[@absalomdraconis]

Astronomers and astrophysicists normally deal with stuff where they don't need to model electromagnetism. Also, while EM isn't as hard to model as the strong force, it _does_ require more computer power than gravity.

[@HEXiT_]

​@@absalomdraconis while all that might be true. but in this case its a pretty big blunder to leave it out considering we inhabit the electro magnetic part of the universe. and everything from the electron to black holes to galaxy's to the voids between clusters, produce magnetic effects. basically everything humans see. but no, lets model gravity with fluid dynamics, its close enough. but absolutely wrong.

[@theboathaaa7654]

Hey man. I've never been this early, so i just wanna take the opportunity to say i fuck heavily with your videos. I've been watching for a while, and I hope you never stop updating us with the latest legitament scientific news. I hope your videos continue getting more likes and comments so folks see your educational videos, rather than yhe recent epidemic of AI-generated psudoscientific nonsense videos with room temperature viewcounts that are getting recommended lately.

[@vapormissile]

Read what you just typed

[@speakeroftruth1952]

@@vapormissile Not sure what he just said, and I'm not sure he does either.

[@TheLetterB123]

@@speakeroftruth1952 he is just saying that he really likes anton's videos, and that he hopes they can consistently perform better than the seemingly AI generated shovelware-type videos that have been cropping up lately.

[@carmenmccauley585]

Lol! Yeh. Thanx for letting him know.​@@vapormissile

[@speakeroftruth1952]

@@TheLetterB123 Thanks for translating it for me, I can usually spot those AI vids, but sometimes it takes a minute or two.

[@HombreDeLaNorte]

That’s great news! I’m going to dust-off the old magmatism controller I built in high school and give it another spin!😊

[@noahwhite520]

You’re a wonderful person!!!

[@tommywendt6118]

It’s aliens magnets

[@rockyciraco9531]

Its about time Anton saw the electromagnetic light. 🙄

[@Johnny_Appleweed]

He's too smart to fall for such a simplistic Grand Unified Theory as the Electric Universe model. You should look into the critiques of that model.

[@nzuckman]

​@@Johnny_Appleweed EU is not a grand unified theory. It's a different paradigm for cosmology.

[@DomingosCJM]

@@nzuckman It's a path to the truth.

[@Seigensi]

@@DomingosCJM kay, prove it.

[@DomingosCJM]

@@Seigensi Prove in two paragraphs? I will just say that electromagnetism in plasma is the dominant force and plasma is the dominant medium in the universe.

[@InterruptedByFireW]

Someone mentioned the shadow the other day, now it’s the first thing I see every video !^*$!?!

[@darylbrown8834]

Microphone? Just think of it as space since space is just a shadow.

[@airplaneB3N]

I'm no cosmologist but if I remember correctly, the early universe was mostly dominated by radiation and not as much matter correct? If so, then this theory would make a lot of sense to me.

[@boldtaa]

Half of me is drawn to Anton and half of me is repelled.

[@luketorkington8422]

Very magnetic of you

[@rogerdudra178]

Magnetism is the power I expect to evolve.

[@nightwaves3203]

Unexpected magnetic fields tells you how clueless they are.

[@yvonnemiezis5199]

Interesting to know about this, thanks 👍😊

[@ReznaQay]

does gravity and magnetism compound together to create a greater pulling force?

[@emmanuelweinman9673]

I think we all need to remember how all the different forces of this universe diverged from a unified force in the earliest universe. The gravity that super massive centers of mass have are inherently linked with the electromagnetic force that is mediated throughout all light. And as the tidal forces of matter being ripped apart generate different particle interactions, the strong and weak forces are also contributing to the energy transformations surrounding black holes.

[@deathbydeviceable]

So in essence we are one

[@emmanuelweinman9673]

@@deathbydeviceable Yes, but I said it intelligently 😂

[@myklenero]

Completely agree with this!

[@robertsteele474]

@@emmanuelweinman9673 I bet you padded your grade school essays just to fill the word count.😉

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

" The gravity that super massive centers of mass have are inherently linked with the electromagnetic force that is mediated throughout all light. " Pardon? Electromagnetic forces are not "mediated" by light, what are you talking about? And no, gravity is not "linked" with the electromagnetic force. The rest is even more wrong.

[@dapperwolf6034]

Electric universe Bros going to be eating good tonight

[@nzuckman]

😋😋😋😋

[@DomingosCJM]

Ooooooh, YES! 😋😋😋

[@npg192]

Been saying this for years. It's all about magnetism and fields. I believe it trumps gravity. Magnetic fields are far more powerful than gravity.

[@lesadams647]

Yes, and could be the ultimate limiting factor for collapse inside a black hole...

[@cementpirate]

Question After big bang all expands in a sphere could we not be viewing galaxies opposite of the center of explosion would this not explain galaxies age and size discrepancies

[@christiandeininger1790]

Its a wonderful universe

[@donvineyard8654]

I've thought for decades that electromagnetism play s a vastly bigger role in the universe. But for some reason scientists dump everything on gravity and ignore electromagnetism. Good to hear it is being considered again.

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

Are you lying purposefully, or are you simply pig-ignorant? Astronomers have been studying the role of electromagnetism in space for _decades_ !

[@DivergentStyles]

It's funny since gravity actually is electro magnetism.

[@gravitonthongs1363]

This does not replace gravity It is just more electromagnetic interaction that astrophysicists have been discovering and studying for a long time. You are preaching pseudoscience.

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

@@DivergentStyles Gravity is _not_ electromagnetism - there are lots of _obvious_ arguments against that. Just two: (1) Gravity is always attractive, while electromagnetism can also be repuslive. (2) The weight of an object does not depend on its electric and/or magnetic properties.

[@gravitonthongs1363]

@@bjornfeuerbacher5514electrons have mass so that is not entirely correct. Better to say: 2. Charge has no great effect on gravitational potential

[@wesbaumguardner8829]

"Nuh, uh. It is impossible for electromagnetic fields to work at those distances because I said so." Relativists for the past 120 years.

[@douglaswilkinson5700]

Magnetic fields decrease in strength according to the inverse cube law. I.e. They decrease in strength exponentially.

[@wesbaumguardner8829]

@@douglaswilkinson5700 Gravitational fields decrease per the inverse square law, which is also an exponential decrease. Electromagnetic radiation disperses per the inverse square law. Strange, that is an electromagnetic field condition not decreasing the way you claim it decreases. What you are talking about decreasing per the inverse cube law is the magnetic component of the dielectric field, and not the entire field itself. A common mistake. With that said, your inverse cube argument is practically irrelevant as there is no known limitation to the size of an electromagnetic field. Anything that is inside an electromagnetic field is going to experience electromagnetic forces. That is just straight up irrefutable scientific fact. The largest known structure in the universe, the cosmic web, is comprised of moving charged particles. Moving charged particles cause electromagnetic fields. All galaxies are inside the filaments of this web and are subject to the electromagnetic forces caused by the moving charged particles of the cosmic web.

[@whattheflyingfuck...]

@@wesbaumguardner8829 don't scare the "physicists" with reality and facts, they are in dark-energy-land

[@A_Stereotypical_Heretic]

​@@wesbaumguardner8829brother, relativists proposed these a long time ago, they're called magnetars.

[@skylark8828]

But gravity always wins

[@vensroofcat6415]

One way or another early universe was much denser. Which would mean all forces as well. Some extreme collapses, synergies or avalanche like effects, nuclear kind included must have been rather common. The idea of slow development like we would see in current universe was a rather far fetch. Fish talking about (ancient) water.

[@erichroberts1768]

makes me wonder if black holes are a result of some sort of check and balance within spacetime throughout our universe 🍳

[@kalrandom7387]

Give them a cookie. Though it is not the present electric universe model either. In my humble opinion, when every model breaks down at a certain point, that means something's wrong in the theory, and both at present fail at certain points. We are missing something that is very important.

[@michaelstiller2282]

Well it is EU because the root of EU is that gravity is not the major force in cosmology. That has been the biggest argument against EU, where its asked, prove gravity isn't the major force. This head line says, gravity is not... I am shocked he wrote it. As he trashes EU everytime he has to give it a mention.

[@ThePowerLover]

@@michaelstiller2282 EU is not that, not lie.

[@michaelstiller2282]

@@ThePowerLover You just want me to guess what you're talking about? I'll be you. What ever your talking about is a lie.

[@dejablueguitar]

Hmmm... Sounds like The Electric Universe may make a come back!! YES!!

[@gravitonthongs1363]

No, obviously

[@DomingosCJM]

I agree, EU rules!

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

Not at all. This has almost nothing to do with the pseudoscience of the EU.

[@davidh.4944]

Confirmation bias always takes control of the EU cranks when the words "electric" or "magnetic" show up.

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

@@davidh.4944 Yes, when I saw the topic of Anton's video, I already was sure that there will be _lots_ of EU cranks in the comments. :D

[@Charlie-phlezk]

Sure, why not!

[@ChrisM-hx9kv]

Commenting to feed the algorithm 🙃

[@Hirome_Satou]

I'm going to be honest, the more we learn about black holes, the more it sounds like there's actually a new type of star at the center of black holes that are so massive that light can't escape, rather than it being a singularity.

[@ray1956]

DUH 🤦🏾‍♂️ it’s NOT a singularity 👨🏿‍⚕️👨🏿‍⚕️😀

[@funky555]

a singularity really seems absurd at this point. why cant black holes have a physical surface. honestly, the more i think about it the less that question sounds stupid

[@gravitonthongs1363]

@@funky555anything past the event horizon would need to be travelling at the speed of light to stay still. Matter cannot travel at light speed so it must continue to fall.

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

Huh? Nothing in this video (and nothing in _any_ research I'm aware of) suggests that " there's actually a new type of star at the center of black holes", where did you get that idea from?!?

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

@@ray1956 How do you know?

[@arctic_haze]

This may be more or less true but I am afraid that the "Electric Universe" bunch will misinterpret the study completely.

[@johnk-pc2zx]

It's called electromagnetism for a reason.

[@BriarLeaf00]

Oh, they will.

[@ValidatingUsername]

Please enlighten me as to what you think energy is fundamentally outside of abstract mathematical objects

[@thumbs4fingers]

Magnetism is a phenomenon associated with magnetic fields, which arise from the motion of electric charges. 🌠

[@ValidatingUsername]

@@thumbs4fingers When did you become conscious of that information and entangle it with your neural circuits and then type it out on the internet to recreate a legible entangled explanation of the abstract concept?

[@Goodkiwibloke]

Simulations are just calculations based on formula and laws. And James Webb is showing unexpected things nearly every day, meaning our laws and formulas are incorrect. Errors in calculations are always additive In summary, using faulty laws and formulas in massive calculations leads to predicted outcomes with high levels uncertainty Sounds like a guess to me

[@michaelneal6589]

Thank you Anton

[@Dvpainter]

Still confident that dark matter is macroscopic magnetics and/or gravitational field interference related

[@douglaswilkinson5700]

Astrophysicists call dark matter an "observable effect for which a cause has not yet been discovered." Its effects are easily observed. What causes them is unknown.

[@camoTiaras]

The super massive black hole in the centre of galaxies may act like an electric motor that spins the galaxy while creating magnetism, maybe galaxies are mechanical / electrical ?.

[@projardgreen2568]

Hello Anton, I have an HONEST question: How is it that black holes have such powerfull gravity that not even LIGHT, photons, gets sucked in, but the magnetic fields are NOT? Remember that fisical "things" DO AFFECT magnetic lines, as so DOES happen even in our sun.

[@Earwaxfire909]

Charged particles outside of the event horizon can circle the BH fast enough to maintain orbit. As they move they generate tremendous polarized magnetic fields that are massless and can radiate in a variety of directions. That part of the magnetic field that radiates towards the BH can be trapped. That part which radiates away can be free.

[@darylbrown8834]

Watch Ken Wheeler magnetism and then apply that knowledge to the universe.

[@projardgreen2568]

@Earwaxfire909 So the magnetic field depicted on this video are NOT from the BH then? OK, thank you! But, by the way, what about the BH's magnetism? Do the have one powerfull enough to escape the black sphere?

[@projardgreen2568]

@darylbrown8834 Earwaxfire909 answered my question already. About your response, dont forget we're talking bout a black hole here, regular universal behaviour of magnetic fields dont apply. I have asked about how the magnetism of these black spheres work, if they can escape at all...gonna research to see if there's a video about it, meanwhile, I'll check what you sujested too, but I assume behaviours must be quit diferent... Thank you though!, I'll check what you sujested...

[@brrrayday]

In a powerful magnetic field, could the diamagnetic effect overpower gravity?

[@gianpaulgraziosi6171]

8:20 electromagnetic

[@upsguppy520]

shhh you cant say electricity it will destroy the gravity model

[@robertsteele474]

@@upsguppy520 Shhh... Dougie Wilkinson will have a stroke.

[@gianpaulgraziosi6171]

@@robertsteele474 who’s Dougie Wilkinson?

[@gianpaulgraziosi6171]

@@upsguppy520 i don’t follow, enlighten me…

[@robertsteele474]

@@gianpaulgraziosi6171 You can find him in the comments if you are a masochist.

[@speakeroftruth1952]

Electromagnetic universe