MASTERING composition in AI art (you can set your OWN layout)

[@tgsredfield]

Great video! I like how your videos are very practical and straight to the point.

[@MasterDiffusion]

Thanks! I appreciate that. Hope they help

[@tikvision]

Yeah. It also helps if you feed foocus with both characters as image prompts and tweak the text prompt. It takes a long while

[@billybobnz1]

Good video have been doing the same. There are a few others I follow who use similar techniques to create gaming assets or characters. Start image or drawing then over to AI engine of choice then to Photoshop or similar then back to AI to refine. A little back and fourth saves them hours of drawing time.

[@MasterDiffusion]

It makes a great work flow.......thanks

[@SGThirkell]

Thank you man. I'm learning this at the moment. Your advice and tips really help me move forward.

[@MasterDiffusion]

Glad I can help! Thanks!

[@bkdjart]

Great concise tutorial!

[@MasterDiffusion]

Thank you!

[@thewebstylist]

Very cool how recreate the image exact but with a more real vibe

[@MasterDiffusion]

Yes. I like it too! Thanks

[@bot-easy7799]

Great tips as always! Can you drop a link to that background remover AI? I didn't know about that until just now :D

[@MasterDiffusion]

sure thing! I'll add it to my description as well. create.pixelcut.ai/background-remover?gclid=CjwKCAjwgZCoBhBnEiwAz35Rwu_WOiKFLOLPjDQqkxrvaoJL4QfEZ9eZZ8U2SgH0Atb8g_n0U6zyTxoCvVsQAvD_BwE

[@gumvue.studio]

thank you

[@MasterDiffusion]

You're welcome!

[@mimmod76]

Genius! I'm subscrive ;D

[@Mike_Studmuffin]

what ancient photoshop version is that?

[@MasterDiffusion]

Cs2

[@daimonien]

Yea looked familiar

[@andrewholdun7910]

Can I do this on an Apple Silicon setup?

[@MasterDiffusion]

I honestly don’t know. I don’t use apple. Have you tried to download and run the program?

[@hoangxon6633]

which lowest GPU can run this? And what is your's ?

[@MasterDiffusion]

I’m not sure how low you can go, I would have to go to the creator site for that information. But I know anything less than a Nvidia 1060 or gtx1070 would probably take so long it wouldn’t be worth it. wish I was more help than that, but you might visit the creators information page. Mine is an RTX 30,70

[@hoangxon6633]

@@MasterDiffusion thx for the information, i'm testing it now

[@bot-easy7799]

I use a GTX 1070. It is a little slow, but not unbearably so.

[@konigint1961]

Very funny how close you people are to realising that actually creating things yourself gives you *all* the control rather than twisting and fighting with these unethical programs that were supposedly meant to cut out all the effort lol.

[@MasterDiffusion]

I just see AI as a tool. No different than when the airbrush came out. The nice thing about these programs is that many people do not have an artistic gift and it lets them have a little creative fun.

[@konigint1961]

@@MasterDiffusion AI generative programs are not comparable to things like airbrush or even digital painting as a whole new medium. Those are actual tools, but using these is akin to asking someone *else* to make what you want, no matter how you may pick and choose what you do and don't like from the result. Creating art is not something that only "gifted" people can do, it's a total myth that you need some innate talent to make art, or even "good art". People aren't born with those skills and knowledge, they develop them from practice, passion, learning, and dedication. Anyone can do that. To strip away that actual intrinsic part of creating art is a total misunderstanding and borderline disrespect to art as a whole. Genuinely. You're not going to grow your creativity that way either, and those programs aren't capable of creativity. That's not even beginning to mention the fact that these *ONLY* work on stolen artwork which is used to "train it." It's a glorified algorithm spitting out melded pieces it associates with certain words and promts. And it can only begin to work when it has an insane amount of data to pull from. It needs an abundance of actual artworks it did *NOT* obtain with consent. Its blatantly theft being done to put those same artists out of business. Its frankly disgusting and degrading, and it means so much more than you think it does.

[@MasterDiffusion]

​​⁠I am not naive. I have been an artist for years. Is Ai bad? Probably. But it is here to stay. Just being angry at it will not change its use or any legality about it. AI can never out do a true artist. It is better not to dwell on it when we both know it is not going anywhere. It also depends on how you use it. I might use it to get a base scene then move to my Wacom to change it drastically. It is a tool if used properly. You will never stop forgery. That’s been going on for a millennium

[@konigint1961]

@@MasterDiffusion We literally just had the actors strike with a key point being the use of AI, and that was a big thing companies wanted to keep since it could literally undermine the rest of the demands. But they didn't get that. Thay anger and demand for worker's protection literally worked. Acting like it's pointless to oppose it is blatantly wrong and just an excuse. No it can't truly outdo an actual artist, but companies literally don't care because It's far more profitable to use those AI generators and its already putting so much more strain on real artists. Laws regulating AI and protecting artists will inevitably fix it if/when passed, don't forget it's not just artistic use that we need to regulate AI for. It's not a real tool, and it doesn't matter how you try to justify it because it's always going to be built on theft. Changing most of whatever it spits out (makes it pointless at that point) still means its built on all that stolen work and supports it.

[@MasterDiffusion]

I honestly do understand your point. Really