after countless hours trying to understand Euler’s Formula and the imaginary plane I vote this as the most effective and accessible learning resource. It will be a crime if this doesn't end up with the same (or more) views as some of the big names out there (Mathologer, 3Blue1Brown, etc)
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
I'm SO glad my videos helped you. I always found complex numbers SO confusing at University and it took me years to understand what was going on. (I'm still of that journey of understanding even today). I'm working on trying to get the videos more views. If you could share them with whoever you might think would benefit from them then that would be a real help to me. Thanks.
@zoharcollins98313 жыл бұрын
I love how you don't leave any stone unturned when trying to explain something, its always easy to skip something you know well however when you haven't always got the best basis foundation of knowledge this type of explanation from almost first principles is brilliant, thank you.
@solaokusanya955 Жыл бұрын
Best by far, this man teaches these maths concept in the most intuitive way.
@MarkNewmanEducation Жыл бұрын
Thank you. That was my aim. I have always found mathematical explanations rellying on the manipulation of equations a challenge to understand.
@grounded96233 жыл бұрын
This whole series is excellent; takes you step by step from the simple to the complex. Thank-you.
@rizalardiansyah4486 Жыл бұрын
Incredible! Many people seems to gloss over the detail of how the cartesian form developed into the polar and doesn't even tell why each have it's own perks. Hopefully you'll get the recognition you deserved!
@MarkNewmanEducation Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words.
@unamccormack15085 ай бұрын
Wonderfully explained concepts. Everything from the thorough explanations to the visuals are clear. Thank you.
@reptilicusrex47484 жыл бұрын
An outstanding visual explanation of the Fourier Transform. The visuals really help to develop an intuition of the concept and in my opinion that's a big "missing piece" of the standard way of teaching this and similar concepts/ideas at a university. Thank you very much for the effort.
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
You're most welcome. I always needed the diagrams when I was learning this at uni and no-one was drawing them. Everything was always explained only with equations, so I thought that I'd better do the diagrams instead.
@Soubhik12345.7 ай бұрын
Love the fact that you're so passionate about complex numbers ❤
@robertpayne80054 жыл бұрын
Such a great explanation. You have a gift for teaching complex subjects.
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Wow, thank you!
@AM-jh2xl4 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for the final video! I'm glad you've stuck through on a 4 year project. It will help many people in the future.
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I'm still working on the course. Not giving up yet.
@jakkuwolfinsomnia80584 жыл бұрын
Truly the most outstanding video I’ve seen so clearly explained and very interesting to watch. I’ve saved all your videos on my playlist on my channel. Thank you so much for these videos your teaching method is absolutely fantastic I really appreciate your videos 😊
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks!
@jakkuwolfinsomnia80584 жыл бұрын
Mark Newman you’re welcome thank you 😊
@acluster3411 Жыл бұрын
Simply brilliant! Making the case for using the Euler equation to define any wave form. This is the foundation for understanding Fourier equation.
@culater9 ай бұрын
WOW, you are incredible ! Thank you for this superb explanation !!
@devenderraogardas2107 Жыл бұрын
AN AMAGIN AND ETERNAL TEACHING. THANK YOU SIR, FOR YOUR SHARE OF CONTRIBUTION TO THE ETERNAL WORLD OF TECHNOLOGY.
@curtpiazza1688 Жыл бұрын
I enjoy these visual presentations! Learned a lot! 😊
@jeanpaulniko2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely brilliant! What a wonderful exposition. Thank you again, my good man.
@MarkNewmanEducation2 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome. Suggestions for videos you would like to see would be gratefully received.
@jakavanindo73753 жыл бұрын
This is not only awesome but also excellent! Thank you Sir!
@rajneeshjha45174 жыл бұрын
I am also an electronics engineer..and understand the importance of the transform theories.. Thanks for such a nice explanations. Euler and Fourier would be happy with your work.😊😊😊
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome
@dhilipgajendran4444 жыл бұрын
I thought complex numbers are just too hard before watching this one...no words to praise you sir... why such a quality video don't have many views...Ha ha .... I'm feeling for you
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I'm flattered you found the video helpful.
@hintergedankee Жыл бұрын
Human thinking process is fragmented and in order to combine different concepts we have to come up with imaginary concepts which are definitely helpful if we have a hard defined objective.
@vedantshah_4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation , I started loving signal and system as an electrical engineering btech student!
@SumGuyzClone3 жыл бұрын
By far one of the best explanations I've seen. Just a note, at 20:52, that should be 9-2i, instead of 9+2i, but it's corrected in the next slide. I was taking notes and saw that.
@muhittinselcukgoksu13272 жыл бұрын
going on as ( - ) ...
@muhittinselcukgoksu13272 жыл бұрын
Sir Mark Newman, I thank you soooo much for " Math with Complex Numbers" video.
@bertrandtabotarret6887 Жыл бұрын
This is just Amazing. I have learn much today
@MarkNewmanEducation Жыл бұрын
Really glad to have helped. Please share.
@2002budokan Жыл бұрын
Perfect refresher, thank you.
@julians7785 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for making these amazing video!
@sirousmohseni4 Жыл бұрын
I am so glad your channel got suggested to me.
@landonoffmars95984 жыл бұрын
Awesome pictorial lecture. I enjoyed the three "Marks" at 9:00
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Hah hah... Glad you liked it. I really enjoyed doing that shot. I had to think really hard about how to time it properly. I love the possibilities that the green screen process gives me.
@muhittinselcukgoksu13272 жыл бұрын
Would you explain the other specific topic (quaternions). Thank you so much ,Sir Newman.
@wes9627 Жыл бұрын
Some people call the vector a phasor. And as you progress along the θ axis a rotating phasor.
@simonsmith16854 жыл бұрын
Extremely clear explanation. Thank you
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@abhijitmophare23692 жыл бұрын
Great work. Thank you sir for giving us this amazing content.
@eslamramadan48193 жыл бұрын
great work continue
@MarkNewmanEducation3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@deserado1110 ай бұрын
... I have been banging my head on this particular i/e/fourier/etc wall for months ... watched this video and for the first time perceived a faint glimmer of light in the distance ... gives one hope!!!
@MarkNewmanEducation10 ай бұрын
Glad to have helped you. This is one of my older videos. I have since learned more and made other videos on the subject. For example: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZKykoisaNhriLs. Check out my channel for all my videos.
@mvaliak4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation... Now i got come clarity on these things... Thanks
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome
@LL-ue3ek2 жыл бұрын
Great job explaining the deep insight of e^jt. How Mr. Euler had enough brain power to come up with this theory is a mystery. I think the significance of this imaginary number is no less than the discovery of relativity and quantum mechanics. Hats off to Mr. Euler! He commanded as much respect as A. Einstein did!
@bayho89444 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation Thanks a lot
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome
@saranshagrawal80434 жыл бұрын
Best videos about i I have ever seen.❤️
@stimulantdaimamld20994 жыл бұрын
Superb presentation.
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@venkatanagasasidharjaldu52823 жыл бұрын
Sir may be you are from 2040 i think nobody would have gone this much deep and you nailed it
@gello953 жыл бұрын
Simply amazing!
@markjohnson9227 Жыл бұрын
If we take e^(i.pi) +1=0 then we can eventually found e^(Pi/2) =i, how does this happend????????? Can you explain
@lazyboy9089 Жыл бұрын
thank you!!
@michelney2915 Жыл бұрын
Why did I not meet you 50 years ago when teachers who tried to explain these things to us students , because they did not understand what they were teaching us, made a pig's ear of their lessons and we dropped out.
@MarkNewmanEducation Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words. You would have had trouble meeting me 50 years ago. I would have been -4.
@ForestDewberry Жыл бұрын
@@MarkNewmanEducation 😂
@BillWright3 жыл бұрын
At 17:57, when you have 3/2i, why can't we just multipy that one term by i/i, which would give us -3i/2? I know it doesn't work out to the correct answer, but why is it wrong ?
@MarkNewmanEducation3 жыл бұрын
Because you would have to multiply both numbers in the brackets by i. (9 + 2i) * i = (9i -2). You would still be left with an i in the denominator, it would just hop onto the 9 rather than the 2. The beauty of the complex conjugate is it totally cancels all the i's in the denominator.
@MattTytel2 жыл бұрын
Nothing wrong with multiplying by i/i to simplyfiy 3/(2i) to -3i/2. The real issue is you can't FOIL division like he's showing. 3/(9+2i) does not equal 1/3 + 3/(2i)
@hammadullahshaikh4735 Жыл бұрын
V. Excellent video today I found on KZbin▶️...... ❤
@philhersh4 жыл бұрын
Great video work.
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I really enjoyed the technical challenges this video gave me.
@frebo25413 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@MarkNewmanEducation3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it.
@albiorixsaturn353211 ай бұрын
Could anyone share the name of end credit music? It is very cool.
@ABC-hi3fy Жыл бұрын
I can understand adding two complex numbers. But what does it mean when we multiply complex numbers. I thought the purpose of "i" was to keep the real and imaginary parts separate, because they are on two separate axes and that makes sense. Yet why we mix up the imaginary and real numbers in multiplication process. In another word the real parts can increase the size of imaginary parts. Further I can't see grphically the effect of multiplying two conplex numbers, and why we do that and what is the use of resulting complex number and what it represent in physical world.
@qotuzin7 ай бұрын
Adding of complex numbers can be thought of as a translation on the complex plane, multiplying as a rotation (+scaling). If you do a search on KZbin for "visualisation of complex multiplication" I'm sure you'll find some helpful content.
@Multipalermo103 ай бұрын
Awesome
@billfeatherstone30184 жыл бұрын
Excellent I will support Bill in Aus
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@kevincampbell1086 Жыл бұрын
Could any of this work in something other than base10?
@Dr_LK Жыл бұрын
6:26 the angle should be theta+53.1 degrees, not theta-53.1 degrees
@alialyahyai68864 жыл бұрын
You are great
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Really?? I'm just an engineer who has struggled with the concepts for his entire working life and has finally found a way of explaining them to myself. :-)
@kunju77192 жыл бұрын
May be my ignorance.Are the angles in this equations measured in radians.Just curious
@MarkNewmanEducation2 жыл бұрын
Yes. The natural way to express angles with sines and cosines is in radians.
@kunju77192 жыл бұрын
@@MarkNewmanEducation thanks for clearing
@km4hr2 жыл бұрын
@@MarkNewmanEducation So why does the presenter say "degrees"?
@julians7785 Жыл бұрын
Complex nimbers are so beautiful
@ForestDewberry Жыл бұрын
at 20:53 I think I spot a small mistake. The result should be [(3+4i)(9-2i)/85].
@MarkNewmanEducation Жыл бұрын
Woops! You are right. Sorry about that. Thanks for pointing it out. Fortunately, the mistake is only on that slide. It isn't carried forward in the working thankfully.
@محمدمحمد-ج8و1ث4 жыл бұрын
fine
@gavinpeters95314 жыл бұрын
Hi Mark. Is there a lecture 4? Am I missing one?
@perpetuity88114 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXzXnaJ4dtqDbZY
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Yes. Lecture 4 has been out for some time. It was the first one I actually filmed. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXzXnaJ4dtqDbZY
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/aero/PLWMUMyAolbNuWse5uM3HBwkrJEVsWOLd6. This is a link to the complete playlist of all the available lectures.
@gergerger534 жыл бұрын
I wish I had even only a fraction of your video-making skills :)
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
Wow. Thank you. I really enjoyed making this one. I'd just learned how to make 3D environments in my video editing software.
@shawnouellette1953 Жыл бұрын
Fun times in math town.
@MarkNewmanEducation Жыл бұрын
Indeed
@98885654074 жыл бұрын
Are you a professor ?
@MarkNewmanEducation4 жыл бұрын
No, just a humble electronics engineer.
@98885654074 жыл бұрын
@@MarkNewmanEducation you are better than my univ professor.
@josterlau14 жыл бұрын
You have the gift of teaching,
@schitlipz Жыл бұрын
Shalom
@pixelapse96133 ай бұрын
He's a Muslim? No way, as a Muslim we also say "Salam" to other Muslim 😊
@himadrikhanra7463 Жыл бұрын
Iota nahi I cap
@pelasgeuspelasgeus463411 ай бұрын
In the complex plane you represent the imaginary unit i with length equal to the real axis unit. What's the reason for that? I mean, i=sqrt(-1) and real axis unit is 1. So, are you implying that sqrt(-1)=1?
@pelasgeuspelasgeus463411 ай бұрын
OK. A CN's general form is a+bi where a and b are real numbers and bi is considered to be the imaginary part. Right? How do you know that multiplying a real number with the imaginary unit results in an imaginary number?
@cureyonshinosuke5285 Жыл бұрын
Good didactic structure of the lesson. But from the moment I notice your hat, I got so distracted and agitated that I couldn't finish the video. It is so terribly distracting, it destroys your whole effort for the video. Or did you plan to make the video for your religious community only? Then I obviously got the wrong video suggested. I detest religions which have the basic principle that they are the only right one and all others are obviously wrong. And people trying to spread those religions by displaying their symbol on the place that obviously needs to be looked at all the time. The same goes for cross around neck or headscarf. It's as if you tell everybody: see, I am part of this religion and if you are not, you are mistaken, because my holy book says so and it is never lying. I am usually agnostic as long as nobody tells me what I should believe. It's in those moments when I become Atheist. Are you aware of this effect? If not so, please notice that you are offending. If you are aware - well, you just proved me right.
@josephomondi629 Жыл бұрын
I forgot there's a point here where he tells you to convert to his religion
@ahmd-irl Жыл бұрын
See Cureyon if you are in any way offended I would suggest you to once and for only once read the holy books of all the major religions . Also see the intro of his previous video of Euler Identity. Hope this helps.
@throwawayavclubber7269Ай бұрын
Wow, what a little wuss.
@pelasgeuspelasgeus46347 ай бұрын
Complex numbers is fake invented math because (1) the definition of a complex number contradicts to the laws of formal logic, because this definition is the union of two contradictory concepts: the concept of a real number and the concept of a non-real (imaginary) number-an image. The concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number are in logical relation of contradiction: the essential feature of one concept completely negates the essential feature of another concept. These concepts have no common feature (i.e. these concepts have nothing in common with each other), therefore one cannot compare these concepts with each other. Consequently, the concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number cannot be united and contained in the definition of a complex number. The concept of a complex number is a gross formal-logical error; (2) the real part of a complex number is the result of a measurement. But the non-real (imaginary) part of a complex number is not the result of a measurement. The non-real (imaginary) part is a meaningless symbol, because the mathematical (quantitative) operation of multiplication of a real number by a meaningless symbol is a meaningless operation. This means that the theory of complex number is not a correct method of calculation. Consequently, mathematical (quantitative) operations on meaningless symbols are a gross formal-logical error; (3) a complex number cannot be represented (interpreted) in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system, because the Cartesian coordinate system is a system of two identical scales (rulers). The standard geometric representation (interpretation) of a complex number leads to the logical contradictions if the scales (rulers) are not identical. This means that the scale of non-real (imaginary) numbers cannot exist in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system.