Maurice Ravel - Daphnis and Chloé (Orchestre de Paris, Mikko Franck)

[@emynona5721]

Même sans le choeur, des tourbillons de vie et d'amour. Bravo

[@robertcohn8858]

A commanding and exciting performance. Bravo Mikko Franck and the Orchestre de Paris!

[@fingerhorn4]

Absolutely top notch conducting and playing. Ravel was a TRUE genius. The orchestration is utterly virtuosic and sumptuous, exotic, evocative. This performance nailed Daphne and Chloe like I've never heard before. Stunning.

[@haraldvandevelde8566]

I have heard this recording many times....ans still this one of my favorite... Bravo MikoFrank

[@Opoczynski]

Mikko Franck is the coolest conductor on planet earth. Bravo!

[@loiseaunoir1021]

@ 44:19 the layering of strings one after the other, basses, then cellos, altos, violins 1 and 2 leading to the climax. Good video editing! 40:15 sunrise

[@gmzimmermann]

Magnifique. Bacchanale, une des pièces les plus virtuoses jamais écrites pour orchestre est magistrale.

[@dominiquemartin9237]

somptueuse et virtuose interprètation de l ORCHESTRE DE PARIS grand bravo à Mikko Franck

[@mercedesignaciaayvarzeball7026]

Para mí es la máxima expresión del hombre con el mar ,es en donde el hombre se funciona con la madre naturaleza o sea el inmenso mar.

[@MegaVicar]

BRAVO!! Wonderful music, beautifully played! Ravel’s orchestration is so clear and lively. I hope there is a complete ‘Ma mère l’Oye’ on YT. Again, thank you for this!

[@Happysongkla]

さすがフランス音楽はフランスのオーケストラです。東京にも来てください。

[@organist2012]

Yess man!!!

[@FRyuu566]

40:14

[@serlal-s3b]

Oui c'est le meilleur moment musical.... lever du jour!

[@Cursan]

Dommage qu'il n'y ait pas le choeur. L'interprétation et le son sont super. Première fois que j'entends le solo du choeur à l'orchestre. Reste malgré tout très "Ravel". Mais le coté éthéré du choeur manque un peu. Si quelqu'un sait qui à fait la transcription ou si elle est de la main de Ravel. Merci

[@harrymotus]

Il me semble que Ravel avait énoncé la possibilité de remplacer les choeurs par des trompettes.

[@marshallartz395]

No choir. 😭

[@cerealbowl7038]

No choir. : (

[@furrybear57]

I know....this is not Daphnis et Chloe.....it's "Daphnis et Chloe - minus one", for choruses to practice with.

[@arugula_fan]

@@furrybear57 lol

[@Mezzotenor]

Yes, fabulous, but would it have KILLED them to have included the chorus? 😞

[@lyolevrich]

aimez-vous les “ritardandi”...maurice n’a pas écrit asset?

[@huddan6137]

No choir?!?! Seriously???

[@Volt100C]

I also missed the choir

[@gvidalq]

So no choir in the full version, interesting.

[@GuillaumeB7]

There is normally a choir in the full version as well. They probably just could not get one for this performance. Ravel does specify in his score that the notes that the choir is singing can be played by additional instruments instead though.

[@andrewfortmusic]

@@GuillaumeB7 He was rather upset, though, when he found out one of the debuts of the ballet (I believe it was in London?) did not include the choir.

[@paulybarr]

Lovely. But if you're going to play the complete score, DO the complete score- ie with the chorus.

[@peterfitton4529]

Good grief, how out of tune is everything in the first three minutes or so? Especially the bespectacled oboe player? Yes, it got better as things progressed, albeit with several more intonation car crashes, but the start is simply unforgivable from a highly regarded professional orchestra. And yet these commenters are raving about how great the playing was. Unbelievable!