MAVERICK // MAVEN : THE STORY OF A NEW ALL-MOUNTAIN SKI

[@TomPetersenThomasGPetersen]

After 5 years on Vantage 95’s I upgraded to the Maverick 95 and Atomic fixed everything that used to trouble me with the Vantage. The stiffer ski makes it much more maneuverable especially in the “harbor chop.” The Maverick’s cut through the thicker piles and edged nicely over the packed slick spots where the Vantage 95’s would’ve flexed in the thicker snow and slid on the bare spots. When we had 6” of powder recently I wandered into the trees and the Maverick’s were consistent despite what was hidden underneath the snow where the Vantage 95’s would’ve delivered some spongy surprises. 11 days on the Maverick 95 ti skis and with each day they keep getting better.

[@poduss44]

Just a perfect mix of the backland and vantage

[@isabeldearresemartin4497]

I just bought Atomic Maven 86’s and I’m so so excited to test these out

[@elecreations]

COOL!!!! who else is. excited?

[@snowledge]

Looks like a good ski, be stoked to get one one

[@alexandrosandronikos]

Absolutely love my new Atomic Maverick 95ti 180! Over 25 days this season at MtHutt in Canterbury, New Zealand and they haven’t missed a beat! However Atomic has terrible quality control practices in place. First pair I got had factory damage at the bottom of the ski and the replacement pair has a logo that is not stamped in the centre on the ski and it looks very out of place. I would expect much better from skis that retail for 1700NZD!!!

[@niklasvonschledorn3245]

Hope they are light enough to fit a shift binding for some skitouring too

[@nikolajmakar625]

looks alot like the bent chetlers with less tail tbh, the y still look amazing (:

[@MC-tm2uy]

true, but bent chetlers are all wood, i think this line has a couple layers of titanal

[@KevinLauscher]

donut buff, nice job mike

[@kallehermansson5984]

Have a question ! I do not found any info or test of your skis Maverick 83 rx anyware. Seen many videos of yours different skiies but not model 83 rx. Can you please give info on that skii of yours or where to find. Best regards/

[@jamesohlsohl2924]

release date?

[@atomic]

Hey, sign uo here to be one of the firs to know: www.atomic.com/en-us/maverick-maven-coming-soon All the best, Stevie

[@mvdaluz]

Are they pretty much the same ski? Just maverik is for guys and maven girls?

[@FlowFinderUSA]

That appears to be the case blisterreview.com/gear-reviews/ski-reviews/atomic-announces-new-maverick-maven-skis

[@NPow94]

Width under foot?

[@MC-tm2uy]

86 to 100

[@thelodestone]

Excited to try it. I hope it is nothing like a BC100.

[@gbc2348]

What don’t you like about the bc hundreds

[@thelodestone]

@@gbc2348 BC 100 is too soft, too light, too wimpy, too sloppy for my taste in an all mountain ski. If I were a park skier trying to go all mountain, I could maybe see it. But there are so many better skis in that class, I never gave it a second thought. No ding on Atomic though: the BC 120 is a *great* ski, with a core that matches its use case. The Vantage was a fun line too. In any case, I'm intrigued by the Maverick / Maven line.

[@gbc2348]

@@thelodestone thank you for the feedback