Bob Walmsley @ IBC 2019 | Maxon Cinema 4D

[@SandroSanakoti]

Oh my goodness, I love everything of that: Cinema 4D, X-Particles and Bob’s amazing voice!

[@justshady]

@@wormcorpse8443 average

[@rainshih7542]

And plus on Mario's original & incredible creation~ = almost perfect!

[@gershom86]

I've taught C4D for 3 years and I can say he is a really excellent teacher. Doesn't overcomplicate things or dumb things down, but explains precisely what it is in a very engaging manner.

[@officer088]

and that is why even me just jumped in guys :D

[@JimmyHuynhdesign]

Bob is so good at explaining, making it simple and understandable.

[@officer088]

thanks god for every teacher like him

[@wggraffix5157]

I love this guy because he will create something that's complicated AF and say "Its really super SIMPLE" lol I really appreciate your optimism during these tough times of learning X-particles add cinema 4d lol

[@alexkid441]

We all love Bob's voice

[@fabiantomac1772]

I always get exited when I see there’s a new video of Bob or Mario online. Love the tutorials :)

[@andershattne]

That initial demo... mindblowing!!

[@JamesLashmar]

Amazing tutorials! Would have never have figured that for the bag. I'd always kind of think of soft body dynamics with negative pressure. This works so well! Bob is a great teacher, a great addition to the x-particles team!

[@mexihkano]

20 minutes in and I am already making pretty cool stuff. Thank you so much!

[@jamesmcintoshjr]

Also, that Cache retiming... I never knew about that, super useful!!

[@jangogixx]

Amazing presentation. As a beginner, its just stunning to see what you can archieve if you become a pro. thanks for showing

[@Preview43]

The magnificent creations of my imagination are thoroughly handicapped by my ineptitude with C4D. I should've started much younger.

[@patrickgibson7963]

I just went through a bit of pain and solved it - in case it helps anyone else: If you turn the subframe steps for the cloth simulation (in the x-particles tab on project settings) when the emitter attached the particles to the cloth object on frame 1 it adds them as if the FFD deformer wasn't there. This means the cloth starts from the "thin" cube position which intersects the collider object that is supposed to be inside it. I had to create my cloth object how I wanted it then do "Current State to Object" to have my cloth geo not intersecting the collider object. Then I could turn the subframe steps up to my hearts content and the sim worked great. Hope that helps someone! Love this tutorial though - thanks Insydium crew!

[@JonathanWinbush]

I like how complex it looks in the render but once you break it down it's all pretty basic and doable 🤙🏿

[@JonathanWinbush]

@@michaelgardner3534 lol 👊🏾👊🏾

[@JonathanWinbush]

@Spenser Dickerson yea we do need more live step by step XP walk throughs.

[@goodbreadco]

wow I am mesmerized

[@oliviaswiss]

Amazing Bob as always! Thanks man for being so passionate and helping us improve our x-particle art!

[@kabanagoose]

Bob is the greatest explainer!

[@BobbyLachapelle]

Good job Bob and Mario. Cheers!

[@Ghaffar75001]

Awesome X-particle & awesome Bob Walmsley..!

[@marcosdevoto2026]

I was waiting big time for this one!

[@sgmazawi]

fantastic!!! Love it

[@jamesmcintoshjr]

I want my spirit animal to be Bob Walmsley

[@j053_art]

One of the best doing this!!!

[@stracknl]

Great explanation, thank you Bob

[@philhighfield4741]

I've been using x-particles 16 years now and I still can only make a spinning twirly thing :(

[@CorazonDeSamurai]

How you do the F 3?

[@skrotov]

yeahhh =) thank you very much guys =) love it

[@harun3Ddigitalartist]

thank you sir

[@MotionPunk]

Bob's a killer!!!

[@KiskadeeStudios]

Greetings i am getting a problem at the back of the text the "Cloth" is not attracting to the back of my text only on the front and sides ... who can help i want to show the camera to rotate around the text as its being wrapped without the imperfection of the simulation at the back?

[@sophiawang3796]

I'm trying to do the same time remap use the cache tag. But it doesn't work, as the thing you did when you set 0F at F0, 90F at F90 it's like you unchanged it, I did the same thing but the result was not like unchanged it, what I got was like the sucking shape of the last couple frame slightly sucking, I did try to find out why it is like that, but no luck so far. Can anyone tell me why?

[@bureauheist]

thanks for sharing your tips!

[@jarek3573]

Why Maxon can't extend C4D with something similar to xparticles? 800$ for the plugin from some 'outside' company is a bit much.

[@HeapsMad]

lol just download it... its not that hard to find on google with a simple search ;)

[@ralphwealth163]

omg... thats pretty amazing

[@ericzhou6596]

Where can we find the full project tutorial?

[@Djoshua1000]

чувак, ты - охренителен! я из страны, где не очень любят платить деньги за чужую интеллектуальную собственность, но ты убедил меня купить X-Particles...

[@CHEKER19]

бери две)

[@dolchpower7339]

the real cracks sitting home and watching this on youtube, because they have no time for visiting xDD, like me LOL

[@malek9646]

Bob’s ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@MohammedHazemdiscreet]

X-Particles plugin please ?

[@clydecotton]

Like a boss!

[@pactube8833]

Cinema 4D is good but I love Blender ❤

[@olgapichugina62]

This is magic:))

[@sleepday777]

Это щедевр, кто ставил диз!

[@alientan2949]

Looks like you are just on a laptop and the sim is much faster than my 2990wx

[@margru8207]

What. A. Plugin. I need this 🙏

[@Viccc8]

Bob, you are God.

[@selfscience]

Fuking impressive.

[@YURIexr]

bob walnut

[@gusmendez2564]

I dont know a single person that uses cycles

[@justshady]

i do, when i have to switch between mac and pc.

[@diminishedreturn]

It's not a bad renderer. Cycles' problem is probably that there are many others that are also good and that are way more established since before. I have nothing against Windows and Nvidia but I'm on Mac myself, and I think it's borderline criminal how all the renderer companies have handed the whole market to Nvidia. Yes, CUDA was/is great when it got introduced but you could easily have the same level of performance on AMD cards today with low level APIs like Metal if they had the same support and continuous development. Let's hope the playing field levels out in the years to come-because that would benefit PC/Nvidia users equally. Just like AMD's rise in CPUs are pushing Intel's prices down.

[@diminishedreturn]

Looks like good times. But it's depressing to see how Octane, Redshift, Arnold, Maxwell, Vray and Cycles are just giving the whole market to Nvidia and Windows. I have nothing against those companies per se, but it would be nice to see support coming to the new Mac Pro. And while Cycles dropped OpenCL I wonder if the Blender community might be the key to get a great render engine like Cycles ported to Metal. Looking forward to more training being added to my Maintenance area on a regular basis! Thanks!

[@xrossfader]

Blame Apple for forcing the hand bro. Apple dropped GPU engine support for Metal. AMD just started developing ray trace support on its GPUs while Nvidia is 2 generations in its GPUs. They are playing catchup when it comes to supporting the 3D professional. RS, Otoy are doing their best in developing Metal support but its not their fault. Downgrade to High Sierra, install the Nvidia web drivers and you can use up to a 1080ti in an eGPU with Octane, RS, Cycles. Otherwise you're just going to have to wait or upgrade to a PC.

[@diminishedreturn]

@@xrossfader I don't blame Apple. I applaud them for dropping old, legacy APIs and formats. Metal is a low level, efficient API that leverages hardware a lot better than what it replaces. As long as the renderers co-develop Metal, all is good.