Mazda 3 Skyactiv-G 120 (2018) | POV Drive on german Autobahn - Top Speed Drive

[@bennyb.2392]

Dähmliche Kommentare hier, ist doch ein gutes Auto! 120PS und 200Kmh ist vollkommend i.O.

[@dan4382]

Yo delete your profile pic right now

[@emmanuelabbansagoe4367]

I bought the same model (used) as in the video in October 2023. Took it on the Autobahn (Berlin - Brandenburg) for the first time since successfully got my German Driver's license. I however did not have that courage to turn on the sports mode

[@sebasGST45]

8:27, sounds so good!

[@tristanyoung4161]

Like a hoover 😆

[@5220640]

Sounds like it's struggling to deliver power

[@space.cowboyyyyy]

Great sound!!! Mazda is awesome!!!

[@ΓεώργιοςΤζίβας]

At this video your maximum speed was around at 205 km/h.

[@tabban21]

Excellent video

[@mariangheorghiescu1272]

Love you, love Jinba Ittai

[@pawballer1964]

Lot of comments are complaining about it doesnt get more than 200 kph... Besides drive like this in Autobahn, who cares? 🤦‍♂️

[@christianromero7105]

ufff!! i like mazda 3

[@felipeagudelo6266]

Uberholspur. Excellent video, very good, for when pov driving motorcycle.

[@mr.brouwer8083]

Great car! Just get it with a manual transmission.

[@danielmelendez3546]

You can get the AT and just switch to Manual.

[@Jason.1999]

the Manual transmission from Mazda is top tier getting mine in 2 weeks

[@mr.brouwer8083]

@@danielmelendez3546 Good luck with that!

[@MarioxJolienSpiderFreak]

Agree i traded my automatic for a manuam after 2 years

[@filipturcin1288]

Why not automatic ?

[@geeder9086]

In the USA, the 2.0L puts out 155hp -- but your video doesn't seem any slower than a US model. Do you have the 14:1 compression ratio? It's limited to 13:1 in the US.

[@TopljiviSir]

It is 14:1

[@Guill0rtiz]

All cars are going at those high speeds so uniformly, they look slow...

[@TheAgitoLP]

Ich weiß gar nicht ist das HUD optional? Mal sehe ich es mal nicht, aber ich frage mich warum man daran spart das ist doch voll cool :D

[@camilojosesolartepaz2404]

What are the RPMs at 100km/h and 120km/h in drive mode ?

[@sabihislam112]

2000 and 2300

[@sunchot]

How much liters per 100 km is the average fuel consumption of this 120 hp mazda when driving with 140 km/h?

[@itsmylife4fucksake]

i have one mine average is 6.7, with heavy city driveing 80-90% not smashing throtle ofc. 140kmh 5.5-6l 100km in6th gear depending on altitude. Also of humidity as it is a NA engine. But seriously in 5th 80kmh under 4.8 always steady throttle. And in 6th also same on 100kmh under 5 always if you keep it steady. on climbs depends of climb but in 5th 90kmh 8-10l. 6th 110-120 it is same from 8 to 10l per 100km

[@sunchot]

Thank you for the answer! @@itsmylife4fucksake

[@felixdada4416]

on the highway 140-150 kmh ,but also with 100kmh if it's necessary I get 6l. This is only if I'm gentle with the throttle. ( plus some heavy acceleration) in the city 8-10l it depends (

[@ZM-ew6zo]

@@itsmylife4fucksake koji motor ima (je imala) tvoja mazda, koje godiste i da li si imao neke probleme sa njom ?

[@furkanyagdi8572]

Hallo Überholspur was ist das für ein knopf was du da gedrückt hast ab 2:51 min

[@Qartveli_97]

Furkan Yagdi sport-mode

[@TasimanaOG]

what is the 0-100? i am getting the 155hp version which on car and driver does a 7.6 0-100

[@Andr_W_]

why this has a normal km/h display? other mazda 3 does have different displays with 0 - 8000

[@pawballer1964]

It's because of different specs. The ones with revs as main display and digital speed are higher spec

[@savydaniel]

As a romanian, I can now say something that I usually can't, in my country: oh look, motorways!

[@enkerl9172]

Das sind noch Motoren.Hatte einen Mazda 626 v16 122 PS der ging auch 210 laut Tacho

[@megachipzyable]

Wieviel hat der Wagen auf der Autobahn verbraucht?

[@fruchtpresse84]

Welche Strecke seid ihr gefahren? Kommt mir bekannt vor

[@_duncan_2001_]

Ich glaube A1 zwischen Bochum und Leverkusen

[@makkeyn]

what acceleration time to 100km\h? cant find videos

[@jonah7942]

10.2 s

[@alessio54321]

Do u guys have the 2.5 litre 184 hp version in europe?

[@MFBocka]

Nope :(

[@edgymachine]

Nope

[@itsmylife4fucksake]

We have better 2.0 165hp, with simple mods like exhoust intake and tune, is lighter and faster on streight line then 2.5. Also not to mention more fuel efficient and less money ;)

[@Rtuzemsky]

@@itsmylife4fucksake so it is possible to tune the 2.0 120hp to 165hp?

[@standardheat-fs8159]

@@Rtuzemsky The g165 and the g120 have the same engine I believe with the difference being in the ECU, I would say you can even get more than 165HP with proper tuning

[@catalinalexandru201]

how much fuel consumtion on highway at speed of 130km/H ? medium consumtion?

[@willisbruce4044]

About 6,0L/100km assuming there's no incline

[@edgymachine]

Holt euch bloß nen Manuellen, das Automatik-Getriebe ist der größte Reinfall!

[@e.d.6675]

Warum? Die AT im Mazda ist doch top.

[@skymind9542]

Seh ich genauso, das Automatikgetriebe schaltet im Alltag butterweich, wenn nötig aber auch mal 2 Gänge auf einmal runter beim Kickdown. Aber Hauptsache mal ne Behauptung in den Raum geschmissen, ohne sie zu begründen... 🙄

[@pawballer1964]

I'm looking at Mazda 3 AT and comments like that (are so bad) scares me. I guess it has to be tries

[@MrPicky400]

Its just the 120hp version. there are faster versions to the car

[@derbigpr500]

Yea, a 120hp which feels slower than 1.0 TSI in VW's and 160hp version which is considerably slower than a 1.5 TSI with 150hp.

[@MrPicky400]

@@derbigpr500 but will only win on straight, mazda win pass on the corners and i rather the naturally aspirated engine. Turbos are expensive to maintain and kills engine life span. And small turbos found in these only has quick 0-100 but runs out of steam at the top end. We dont by vw in our countries due to being unreliable and no resale value. But mazda 3 are everywhere

[@carefulcoast8907]

BeyerT1 The Mazda is actually faster in acceleration then the golf.😉

[@JA-ht8dl]

Here in Mexico I have the 188 HP version (2.5 l).

[@anfahrt]

Dein Scheibenwischerblatt ist kaputt.

[@rbaaj7776]

is with turbo ?

No, naturally aspirated

[@tristanyoung4161]

Too noisy😣😣😣

[@usbuzb]

Wth, my 2017 Mazda 3 Sport is way too fast than this mazda. I think this video is to show like "how slow mazda 3 is".

No

[@ichheissedamian]

this sentence is way too no grammar

[@jhxu7293]

@@ichheissedamian I agreement, the grammar of him is too worse

[@motorbloxx]

this is the slow version

[@luisestebansantana3070]

2.0 with 120hp lol

[@pawballer1964]

It's locked by software. You can easily reach 175hp with only ECU unlock

[@MarioxJolienSpiderFreak]

Mazdas automatics are slow... i traded my AT for a manuam after 2 years 🤷

[@Οειρηνικόςπολεμιστής]

1.5

[@Lookmanelala]

So noisy car a for slowly performance like that ! If I had to choose I won't take the petrol engine but instead I will go for the diesel one

[@vicentepacheco1671]

Look Austral Noisy engine? Or the wind noise inside the car?

[@Lookmanelala]

Vicente Pacheco the loud sound of the engine when it shift down for overtaking. I don't know about the wind noises, but it seems to be ok. Have to try this car in the future if I can, but I would probably take the diesel engine except if Mazda add a turbo on their petrol engine

[@vicentepacheco1671]

Look Austral i try the 2.5L gas engine and was very quiet, and yes, you are right about the engine noise when it shift down

[@Lookmanelala]

@@vicentepacheco1671 ya Japanese diesel engine are very good, reliable, powerful, and it do not sound terrible like the TDI or hdi or truck engine like that 😂

[@usbuzb]

@@Lookmanelala noise when downshifting is just because of the motor is powerful. Mazda 3 is the best in its class.

[@mete5532]

Da kommt ja mein vw t4 schneller voran.

[@skymind9542]

Wie immer - kommt drauf an. In diesem Fall auf den Motor im T4.

[@mete5532]

2.5 tdi 111kw

[@mete5532]

@@skymind9542 gewicht auch nicht vergessen

[@h2044-c5o]

@@mete5532 Mehr Hubraum, mehr PS und Turbo.

[@derbigpr500]

Makes you appreciate European downsized engines which actually have torque to move the car and don't sound like vacuum cleaners every time you want to accelerate even a little bit. The 1.5 TSI engine in the Golf for example is a masterpiece compared to these engines.

[@HRaimov]

So you can get a new engine after 150k km 👌🏻😂😂

[@anankobabangida8455]

Even if it's downhill, only 200! Really a bad performance!!!

[@anfahrt]

TUTSİKİ KOYAMA This only is a 120hp car. What do you expect?

[@weedmastersr]

What does it matter what displacement it has?

[@weedmastersr]

Yeah, through adding an unreliable turbo. Let's see, VW TSI engine, a total failure, Renault 1.2 Turbo failure, Ford Ecoboost catches fire. All downsized engines either have terrible reliability or other major issues. Plus, NA engines are better, lighter, simpler and offer instant acceleration response. It's fine to use turbos in some sports car, but in small SUV, a reliable naturally aspirated engine is much better.

[@anfahrt]

Yes that's totally true Protector. Maybe the downsizers have more power but they don't even reach 100tkm without major issues, often even a total engine failure which needs an engine replacement. I am a huge Renault fan and work in a Renault shop. I honnestly have to say, the newer 0.9 tce and 1.2 tce engines are catastrophic engines. They have major issues with their timing chains and the 1.2 is badly known for internal polution problems, turbo break downs. We had customers for whom we had to change to whole engine at 40tkms. VW the same with the TSI engines, Opel the same with their new 3 cilinder engines. These down size engines they are completely worn out at 100tkm sometimes even earlier because they have to work too hard for what they are. These huge turbo and injection pressures wear out the piston rings and all other engine componants such as the pistons and even the crankshaft bearings. With 0.9 tce engine even the gearbox breaks down before 100tkm because of to high pressure on it. A shame because Renault petrol engines used to be very good. The old 1.8 and 2.0 16v engines they were the best. Run over 300tkms without major issues. These Mazda engines are very good too. A collegae of mine who works on Mazda they say they now have the first Skyactive engines who have 200tkm on the clock. No issues with these engines and no engine wear noticeable. Also Honda engines are top notch. Never break down and good for 500tkm and more!

[@anfahrt]

1.6 dig.t is a Nissan engine. Then your friend with the 0.9 tce is very Lucky. In our shop we had several 0.9 tce's with complete gearbox failure. When we opened them there was a huge amount of metal debris in them. The bearings of these completely worn out before 100tkm. Luckely Renault is going to introduce a replacement for this engine soon. The 1.2 tce has already been replaced by the 1.3 tce which is a common development with Mercedes Benz.