Pythagorean Theorem Converse: Euclid's "Elements" - Book 1, Proposition 48

[@williamcurt7204]

We have Thomistic mathematicians. Now all we need are Thomistic physicists and chemists and we can form Megaforce.

[@educationalporpoises9592]

There is Quantum Thomist, a physicist from... I think Oxford? Idk.

[@williamcurt7204]

@@educationalporpoises9592 I don't know if his field was quantum mechanics, but I do know of a Domincan priest who has a PHD in physics from Stanford: Fr. Thomas Davenport. He's done videos for the Thomistic institute before. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qn-tk5uHi7utbqs

[@mastershooter64]

Will you consider making videos on geometric calculus, like the ones you made on geometric algebra?

[@Math_oma]

That's the plan.

[@mastershooter64]

@@Math_oma oh niceee thanks, also is there any meaning to infinite dimensional geometric algebras? can they even exist? would they be useful?

[@kaiseramadeus233]

@@mastershooter64 he never did do it

[@agamenongoncalves3994]

Will you do book 2?

[@LeBookKeeper]

Hi Mathoma, are you still going to upload videos?

[@ethansmusic9898]

If you are planning to cover Geometric Calculus, then will you do some background videos for Calc 1 and 2 or will you just ask that people have that knowledge already?

[@Math_oma]

Probably the latter, although I may review multivariable calculus things if needed.

[@rdbury507]

Usually Euclid handles these converse theorems by indirect proof, so this didn't go the way I though it would at all. The proof uses the fact that if the area of two squares are equal then the sides are equal, which is trivial but not immediate. Anyway, I enjoyed the series; you made the proofs much easier to follow compared to reading them out of a book. I guess now that there's a "movie version", people have no excuse not to have read The Elements. Though I suppose watching all 48 proofs in one sitting would be a bit much.

[@captainch6182]

I would like to ask you a few questions if you don’t mind. Specifically about some ethical/philosophical issues

[@thattimestampguy]

Congruent Triangles have Congruent Angles.

[@enriqueirizarry2349]

Hey when are You going to respond to atheist videos again?

[@crobeastness]

ya wasnt this a catholic channel? now its a math channel?

[@ChristianSigma]

@@crobeastness it’s both mathematics and Catholic

[@floydthomas4195]

Make more vids about Theism/Catholicism.

[@floydthomas4195]

@@tinttiakka2028 Submit to Rome

[@crobeastness]

wasnt this a catholic channel? now its a math channel?

[@Math_oma]

Both.

[@VincentLN2002]

Always has been

[@pax9431]

Math and Catholic ⚜️

[@ŻƏŭß]

Make more vids about atheism

[@ratio518]

Debate Jay Dyer