Thanks for publishing this talk and discussion; it's very informative.
@mami42g4 жыл бұрын
This is golden, I'll watch it asap
@tyfoodsforthought4 жыл бұрын
I am pretty convinced. Thank you very much for sharing this talk!
@tubeaphid4 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Thank you!
@thomaskaminski75114 жыл бұрын
Even more respect for the Independent SAGE.
@pascalbercker7487 Жыл бұрын
I've known about Markov blankets only in the context of Bayesian Networks but always thought it was a technical matter limited to that context. I Never realized that it could have such a wide-ranging and far-reaching consequences.
@valueengines218410 ай бұрын
So what does self evidencing mean?
@p-j-y-d6 ай бұрын
Friston demonstrates a talent for obscuring rather than clarifying with his answers to fairly straightforward questions.
@uncanalmenor4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic
@davidkincade71614 жыл бұрын
The “prediction error” is called “stress”- lol “learning” is adjusting so prediction error goes down next time... no stress or some awareness of prediction error means nothing needs to be learned... measuring predictive error? Well in the real world it’s probably mostly subjective and hugely multi-situational.
@davidkincade71613 жыл бұрын
@rwalser learning doesn’t necessarily reduce prediction error... depends what u learn- u are right... BUT one can assume one learns to reduce stress :-) Some may learn short term because they want to confront and create more stress- but that won’t last- AND Id argue they aren’t really learning- rather augmenting current faulty understanding to protect it... I guess “learning” is tricky wording! Basically if the future unfolds as predicted stress is reduced because u can avoid it.... higher scope of awareness does bring on new challenges for sure, but wider picture recontextualizes current uncertainties and stress.