Membuka isi Perjanjian Lama Bagian 1 - Pandangan menyeluruh Perjanjian Lama

[@willymasela9482]

Ini luarbiasa sekali, mengingatkan manusia bahwa, sejarah Alkitab benar adanya. ayo! belajarlah sejarah di dunia diperpustaan Tuhan.

[@delianasafarina4639]

Shalom

[@boysidabutar5961]

Waduhhh,,, bagaimana kalau seandainya debat2 cristian prince dibuat konsep terjemahannya seperti ini pasti mantul dan semakin banyak orang tercerahkan.

[@sintohyusop2509]

Kitab Yesaya david pawson

[@diyahmulyanti6270]

Bagus ini suka bgt

[@antiislam7722]

Luar biasa.... Mantap. !!!!

[@braheho]

May GOD bless you sir..

[@VivoY-uu7dc]

benar sekali

[@yesuskekasihjiwakuxx6738]

Terima kasih, langsung diterjemahkan dlm bhs Indonesia...

[@dumdum1979]

Iman saya lebih percaya pada Ahli2 Peneliti Alkitab dari dunia Barat, daripada Kristolol- logi dari ustadz2 Mualaf, mmkai cara mrka berTaqiyah...

[@girlygirl2144]

Sama

[@6stonesLoop]

Min, Dabid Pawson itu siapa sih, (maaf lagi malas googling)

[@ManOfOneThing]

Setahuku saya dia Evangelis dari Inggris.

[@manatapsitompul6408]

Harusnya melihat Nubuat dan akar ibrani, penelitian tapi bukan spekulatif. Yahudi tidak percaya karena ada tertulis, Yeshua ben David (raja), Yeshua ben Yusuf (menderita)... Ada tradisi PL itu dilerbaharui tetapi oleh nabi penerus, next bs saya jelaskan, jadi bukan jomplang PL PB, lagi pun yang jomplang injil apokrif kok sama kaya quran ya...

[@briendoyle4680]

The Bible 'book' = a compendium of fire side tales and fables, recounted orally , for generations by goat herders and primitive tribes from the stone age, until writing was invented, and then, many different sources, transliterations, and versions were copied and written down.. ''The Bible was created during a time where stories were verbally passed down over hundreds of years. Stories constantly morphed and changed over time, and the Bible is a collection of these. This is why it has the nearly identical flood story from Gilgamesh, and why Jesus has the same characteristics as Dionysus, Osiris, Horus, Mithra, and Krishna. The contradictions and immorality in the stories are not evidence that God is flawed or evil, but rather that humans invented him, just like the thousands of other gods that we used to, but no longer believe in.'' ..and to answer the questions of the many fears and mysteries of our universe, like 'thunder' and earthquakes, since there was no science yet. That was the old Testament.... The new Testes is also hearsay since these letters, 'gospels' and stories were written by the loyal faithful, the camp followers, not by objective historians at that particular time, or by any contemporary writers, and these tales were written many years after the supposed events of this mythical Jesus. There is essentially very little evidence of a Jesus in real documented history. A couple of spurious Roman reports, and all the rest anecdotal. ...but more importantly ...a jesus' existence is not an issue! A jesus is irrelevant without a god ! Then, many of these stories, but not all, as many were not chosen, [ There are more than just four Gospels but only these four were agreed on ], were compiled for one self-absorbed converted Roman Emperor in his Nicean Council, for his expressed purpose of conquest and control of the people of Europe for his Holy Roman Empire. He recognised that this was the perfect religion/mythology for the future domination of the populaces. Half of the stories were ignored by the Nicean Bishops and none have been proven to be based on fact. This 'Bable' book is backed up by absolutely no facts and no evidence. It is not proof for any god(s) ....(or of any jesus as a god...) The fables are intertwined within historical places and people... eg Egypt and the Pharaohs existed, whereas Moses and the Exodus did not happen...! It is a historical novel .... ie A book of fiction.. Only! The Bible book is proof of a book ... ONLY (certainly not evidence of any gods...) PROVE a god!

[@orfiliusumano6125]

Oh jadi Yahudi adalah sebutan untuk bani yehuda.