Even after 75 years its still a beautiful aircraft.
@thatoneguy74514 жыл бұрын
It looks like an aircraft first designed in like the 1990’s, which is really good considering it was used in 1944-45.
@atoka22064 жыл бұрын
In my opinion the only military jet that's beautiful lol
@panzerivausfg40624 жыл бұрын
@@atoka2206 Luftwaffe planes were all hot
@lonewulf444 жыл бұрын
I'm partial to the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 myself, but she is pretty yes
@cstlbrvo56154 жыл бұрын
262 a Ferrari with wings. Camo paint-job makes it look like a shark..
@Trades4610 жыл бұрын
That sound must have been unreal in WWII. I'd bet many allied pilots would be wondering how the heck does this thing even worked without a propeller back in 1945. And then there was the SPEED.
@russellrobinson854110 жыл бұрын
I had to fortune to talk to an old WW2 vet who was a front line engineer. His unit was one of the first to encounter an ME 262 airfield. This was the first time that they had seen a jet and their original thoughts were "where are the propellers"? It was would be today's equivalent of seeing an airplane without any engines under the wings.
@Battleship00910 жыл бұрын
Russell Robinson Actually there ARE planes without engines in the wing F-86 and MiG-15 for example.
@xRazProductions9 жыл бұрын
Battleship009 Or basically every military grade plane which isn't a strategic bomber nowadays.
@Battleship0099 жыл бұрын
xRazProductions True.
@flyerboy25949 жыл бұрын
Battleship009 you dont get it do you
@challacustica90492 жыл бұрын
No matter how many years pass, this will remain one of the most beautiful jet aircraft of all time. It looks like a leopard shark in the skies. Everything about this plane screams speed, grace and predation.
@cisarovnajosefina4525 Жыл бұрын
Too bad its a first jet Every new breaktrough in technology is quickly out dated If you are the first you don't know what to expect and where you ll find trouble
@nexxis35106 ай бұрын
And it got tested and build in my home town Delmenhorst at the große höhe
@7thZeppelin5 ай бұрын
The placement of the four guns up front is just beautiful. Much love from USA, this aircraft is truly special.
@lowerquadrant46473 жыл бұрын
I had the privilege of meeting some veteran Me 262-pilots during my service with the Luftwaffe in 1999. I was the designated shuttle driver during a wing reunion at Memmingerberg airfield. The old gentlemen were happy to share some stories. Great memories of my younger days.
@sonnyasif24636 жыл бұрын
Imagine being a pilot of a P51, being told you are in the best bit of modern technology to date, then you see one of them fly past you. Scary thoughts
@teslashark6 жыл бұрын
Wait for 262 to land, pound from behind, repeat
@teslashark6 жыл бұрын
You're a sloth, you can't.
@vitalykruschev92166 жыл бұрын
262 always had a problem with ammo and fuel, they're limited
@SuperEdge676 жыл бұрын
Sonny Asif The P51 wasn’t the best piece of technology. The most advanced piston engine fighters to see service in WW2 were probably the Hawker Tempest, Focke Wulf TA 152 and late Griffon powered Spitfires all of which out performed a P51 and had a great deal more fire power.
@thesturm86865 жыл бұрын
See them?
@thesaltycabbage3 жыл бұрын
Imagine just chilling in your ball turret and this zooms past you for the first time it would be like something from another world
@SteveBrownRocks20233 жыл бұрын
I can’t see ANYONE in a ball turret “chilling”.
@pashakdescilly75173 жыл бұрын
The Me262 would whiz past rather fast, could only fire off about 3 rounds of the cannon while in range - slow rate o firing, low muzzle velocity. Not a good gun platform
@gdgotcy-andmore.78533 жыл бұрын
@@SteveBrownRocks2023 just imagine someone slouching with their arms crossed waiting to get near the target
@jeffbandle29163 жыл бұрын
My uncle was a tail gunner on a B26 and mentioned seeing the 262 on a couple of occasions. Had no idea what it was or what was going on. Was so glad the war was coming to an end.
@shadowmanwkp3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the 262 is remarkable for its potential, but it was one of the several death throes of a losing enemy. Germany at the time had massive supply issues, so jet fuel was scarce and engines were recycled constantly. Not to mention that factories got captured rapidly, diminishing the output even further.
@vincep32225 жыл бұрын
The German people were great innovators in their time ..no one can take that away .
@valgo81285 жыл бұрын
Were yes. But not anymore. The price goes to china and usa these days.
@CatnamedMittens4 жыл бұрын
They did themselves. Have you seen their shitty train system?
@TheBlackfall2344 жыл бұрын
@@valgo8128 they dont really invent anything. They just take the foundations and improve on them. No real Invention at all.
@timothyhouse16224 жыл бұрын
@@CatnamedMittens have you seen America's shitty train system?
@Mr.Thermistor72284 жыл бұрын
except america took them away after the war, operation paperclip
@TheCarin123 жыл бұрын
I really do tip my hat to the Germain engineers whenever I see the 262. Absolutely remarkable aircraft.
@angelarainey72583 жыл бұрын
My father flew one from Belgium to England at the end of the war. I describe this in an earlier post.
@utu_be Жыл бұрын
@@angelarainey7258 🤨🤨
@marekmazurek84594 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Czechoslovak Air Force used Me 262 code named AVIA S-92 right up until 1951 when it was replaced by mig 15
@diegoroberto13474 жыл бұрын
Woe
@ylmazirdenyazc83934 жыл бұрын
What happened to Me 262 after?
@derlasercrafterwally43424 жыл бұрын
There are 2 AVIA S-92 still in a museum in Prag. In addition I think around 8 ME262 still exist around the world.
@wandilande96284 жыл бұрын
That old country right? Now it's separated
@ylmazirdenyazc83934 жыл бұрын
@@wandilande9628 yep Czechia and Slovakia but two country is still really close to one another. Much like Turkey/Azerbaijan and Serbia/Monetengro
@danieljames76055 жыл бұрын
sounds alot like my ps4. installing a game
@javier26425 жыл бұрын
Its going to explode
@rookeva86885 жыл бұрын
Daniel james Clean your damn fan
@Brandon-oo3if5 жыл бұрын
Hahahah gold!!
@artyom89055 жыл бұрын
@@javier2642 dude, it's a joke
@javier26425 жыл бұрын
@@artyom8905 I know
@ancylostomiasis8 жыл бұрын
Even in 2016 it still looks scifi.
@georgemilton6788 жыл бұрын
the hg 3 is even more sci fi and more efficent plane unfortunately we only see it on papers now
@prometheus41827 жыл бұрын
Davi Lu For those who are wondering: It's a Horten H IX
@yenchey32707 жыл бұрын
I've always thought it's Ho-229, al least that's what Wikipedia says, and Il-2 Sturmovik 1946
@prometheus41827 жыл бұрын
Yenchey The prototypes were called Horton H IX. The German Air Ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium) gave it the code name 8-299 and the inventors of the plane (Horton brothers) called it Horton Ho 229. But the plane never left prototype status so it never got an official name I guess :)
@yenchey32707 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining it
@alexanderf.89153 жыл бұрын
Einfach unglaublich beeindruckend! Eine wahre meisterleistung deutscher Ingenieurskraft!
@RCScaleAirplanes9 жыл бұрын
Fantastisch !
@TheVovius7 жыл бұрын
It is fantastic. One of my grandfather’s decorations was for shooting down 18 of these fuckers during the forcing of Oder river with his anti-aircraft battery. I call it good project management.
@thelastcommander87657 жыл бұрын
RCScaleAirplanes Its Wunderbar
@BeavisoPaulaner7 жыл бұрын
Only 18? Why not 1188?
@Christof_Classen6 жыл бұрын
*1188 ? He cant count so far ;)*
@vonsauerkraut6 жыл бұрын
bollocks what a load of bollocks why only 18 why not 10,000
@peter455sd8 жыл бұрын
I must admit,this is one of the most beautiful things ever created
@Dave-lr2wo8 жыл бұрын
Just like the death camps and VW scandal, among many other things.
@Dave-lr2wo8 жыл бұрын
I'm going to spend my time in an internet debate with some revisionist neo-Nazi piece of shit FUCK? Nein, Herr Zykon B: They were death camps, and you are a piece of shit. You can reply, but you get no more of my time.
@itsyurmumm84588 жыл бұрын
wewewewewe Many German soldiers didn't even know about the death camps, only soldiers in the SS. All sides in ww2 did horrible things, war isn't nice, but the technology of war, such as jet powered flight, are nice.
@cop-killer-8 жыл бұрын
+wewewewewe you know youre wrong
@Dave-lr2wo8 жыл бұрын
It's the Post-Fact era. The era of fake elections, Donald Trump bootlickers, and moral weaklings.
@CristianoRonaldo-wt4oj4 жыл бұрын
Short of raw materials, fuel, war on all fronts, airfields, cities & factories being bombed round the clock and they still put this remarkable plane in the air (and in combat)
@Rubashow4 жыл бұрын
Because of an ample supply of slave labour ...
@diegoroberto13474 жыл бұрын
@@Rubashow even the allied nations do that
@TheZod004 жыл бұрын
@@diegoroberto1347 Besides the USSR, no they did not.
@Zerggodmaster4 жыл бұрын
@@TheZod00 ehhh if you look carefully they did in ways
@Rubashow4 жыл бұрын
@@Zerggodmaster So, which ways? Did they force 10.000 people to dig an underground bunker without shelter, adequate clothing, sanitation and food? Because that's what messerschmitt did to get its jet factory ...
@kuyaforce61034 жыл бұрын
After all these years, every war machines made by all the WW2 participants still puts most if not all of in awe. And I think that is beautiful :)
@joefish60913 жыл бұрын
We see and admire the popular ie surviving working aircraft, esp movie worthy ones, there were plenty of expensive junk lemons (junk made for profit not use) that were made in lesser numbers that were death traps and useless.
@bkjeong43023 жыл бұрын
Except the ones that ONLY look cool but were a strategic waste of resources that didn’t do anything that other weapons couldn’t have done better. Looking at you, all the WWII-gen battleships.
@ThePointlessBox_4 жыл бұрын
still one of the most beautiful looking planes ever built
@okrajoe9 жыл бұрын
Amazing sound of the Me262 from 70+ years ago.
@roteroktober3609 жыл бұрын
this isnt the original engine
@leneanderthalien9 жыл бұрын
+florianweiss007 only suicidal pilots will fligh with the original engines...they was extremly unreliable and the TBO only 25 hours (in the best cases), but most , they explode before...
@fullgreys0n7387 жыл бұрын
25 fly hours are correct, but in this short amount of thime there were reliable.
@19Koty966 жыл бұрын
they just required good pilotage
@gregedwards10876 жыл бұрын
No, not sound from 70 years ago at all, #501244 is a replica Me-262 built in 2006 with GE J-85 engines that were first designed in the late 50's, these are probably refurbished units that were built in the late 80's.
@eaglex57234 жыл бұрын
Engineers in WWII: Let's design planes. German engineers in WWII: Let's invent planes.
@vermilion77774 жыл бұрын
@Luke Wilson Man, you really got some serious half knowlege here... The swastika is a symbol used in cultures all over the world. Also swastika is the indian name. We germans call it Hakenkreuz (hooked cross). Aryan just means "noble" in indogermanic roots. The aryan stuff wasn't originally used by nazis, but by british 19th century authors who invented all that stuff, which the nazis builded their ideology on. Tell me, why is it more narcisstic for the germans to call themself the "noble people", than for the persians? By the way, they wasn't probably the first one either, who used that word. It's very, very old...
@conny52964 жыл бұрын
@Luke Wilson aryan and swastika was also used in europa so not really stealing. Also a few indians fought on germanys side.
@conny52964 жыл бұрын
@Luke Wilson well the INA in the asian theater had around 100k soldiers which is quit a bunch. For the european Theater it were only around 3k.
@MetalGuitarTimo4 жыл бұрын
@@conny5296 the finnish airforce still uses it btw
@franziskafabig92634 жыл бұрын
My Great Grandpa was one of the engineers 👋🏻
@plebulus3 жыл бұрын
God imagine how futuristic this was at the time
@redbear19355 жыл бұрын
grandfather of all jet fighters :).
@SHx5894 жыл бұрын
The Opa of all jet fighters 😉
@1pcfred4 жыл бұрын
The British built the Meteor first. But the Germans got their plane operational first.
@1pcfred4 жыл бұрын
@Clorox Tree the Meteor flew. It just was not used operationally. The British were not that desperate. So they didn't need to use everything they had. Allies stuck with more conventional platforms.
@josecolon27174 жыл бұрын
Robo Redneck even then, the discussion can be shut down even harder when you mention the He-178 that flew in 1939! Germans win, check and mate
@AlexanderJScheu4 жыл бұрын
@@1pcfred stupido - if - so - churchill would have been - selling his Soul - - for a progressive jet... britain won only under aspect of USA Materials . see Africa battles.. and any others- later
@derlasercrafterwally43424 жыл бұрын
These jets shooting down propeller driven bombers be like "The future is now, old man"
@matteogalbiati87304 жыл бұрын
Propeller driven B-17 squadron: *proceeds to unleash several thousands tons of explosives upon the jet factory*
@somedudewithgrassgrowingou41774 жыл бұрын
"the future was, Young man"
@chairmanzia35564 жыл бұрын
they sometimes blow up themsleves
@bruhmoment95734 жыл бұрын
And the me 262's gets casually shot down by a propeller driven p-51 mustang while trying to turn -_-
@chairmanzia35564 жыл бұрын
@@bruhmoment9573 if they don't blow up first, it was literally a flying bomb.....
@Aikaramba123 жыл бұрын
It looks like a modern plane! Imagine seeing this in 1945
@jaywalker7123 жыл бұрын
Imagine being a allied pilot and having to deal with them.
@nowaskmehow3 жыл бұрын
They got a lot right back then, more than you'd expect.
@youraveragescotsman71193 жыл бұрын
@@jaywalker712 Easy. Fly a Tempest and just yeet it out of the skies. The only aircraft the 262 feared was the Hawker Tempest (and Spitfire to a lesser extent) as they were the only Planes that could actually KEEP UP with them in a dive.
@גבריאל19943 жыл бұрын
@卍 dein Hakenkreuz ist falsch herum.
@ironcraig7003 жыл бұрын
@@youraveragescotsman7119 Why did you make P-51 go cry in the corner? (Sad P-51 noices) :-(
@jakubkrcma3 жыл бұрын
This plane may be 80 years old (piston 1941, jet 1942) but it looks and sounds MEGA cool even today! What a total engineering masterpiece!
@solovevkiril4 жыл бұрын
Allies air forces: what the hell is that? Luftwaffe: turbomachines, son!
@flxdrv50203 жыл бұрын
allied knew well about jet propulsion, the inventor of the jet engine even is french
@MausOfTheHouse3 жыл бұрын
@@flxdrv5020 I agree, but that's debatable.
@flxdrv50203 жыл бұрын
@@MausOfTheHouse what? that's not debatable,literaly from wikipedia "The first patent for using a gas turbine to power an aircraft was filed in 1921 by Frenchman Maxime Guillaume.[8] His engine was an axial-flow turbojet." also my bad i meant french not british
@flxdrv50203 жыл бұрын
@D2RG6 no because because compressor at the time (1921) weren't sofiscated enough, but allied forces knew what the fuck a jet engine was. don't act like the germans invented it and the allies were cleuless about it. it's true that the germans were the first to make a jet fighter, but the british and americans knew what it was and were also working on it. It's just that they didn't really saw the point at the time, and still heavely invested in the piston engine that was at the time way more reliable, and much cheaper.
@blu_e19103 жыл бұрын
Luftwaffle
@fetusofetuso21224 жыл бұрын
it sounds awsome now. I can hardly imagine the first time mankind heard that scream on an airport tarmac.
@andrewstrongman3055 жыл бұрын
The ME 262 has to be one of the most beautiful looking aircraft ever made.
@Tyrfingr4 жыл бұрын
That and the Horten 229
@Maverick8t884 жыл бұрын
Agreed.
@neilcowan5354 жыл бұрын
Maybe without the two giant engines.....
@MausOfTheHouse4 жыл бұрын
I think that award goes to the spitfire.
@andrewstrongman3054 жыл бұрын
@@MausOfTheHouse If you insist on prop driven aircraft, how about the 'Arrow'?
@Frisher13 жыл бұрын
I am simple man I see ME 262 I click
@generalsquirrel95483 жыл бұрын
Same
@rickpin_06123 жыл бұрын
Same
@j.heberhernandez30373 жыл бұрын
Same over here.
@Mr.fox136863 жыл бұрын
Same
@OneMoreDesu3 жыл бұрын
Same, except I don't make cringe joke comments when I do.
@arifcso66334 жыл бұрын
Jet planes: *Has no propeller* Allies pilots: *Confusion Scream*
@ScienceChap4 жыл бұрын
Frank Whittle patented his first jet engine in 1930. His first engine ran in 1937. His first prototype flew in 1940. Jets were not a mystery in 1944.
@shidfard4 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceChap I am sure that wasn't common knowledge for Joe Blow coming from Indiana during WW2
@speelangs71614 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceChap You feel bad because yet again German technology were waaay ahead of yours?
@ScienceChap3 жыл бұрын
@@speelangs7161 it wasn't. The German jet engines were prototypes which needed rebuilding every few hours. British engines were slower entering operational service but were vastly more reliable. German radar was a long way behind. German shipbuilding was a long way behind having been stunted by the Treaty of Versailles. Their tanks were good but overcomplicated and overengineered.
@speelangs71613 жыл бұрын
@@ScienceChap Please don't even compare your technology with the German... its even funny. No nation in such low amount of time produced so much technology. Fist operative jet in the world. First jet bomber. First Rocketry technology "V1 & V2". Guided weapons. First assault rifle. First ejection seat. Maybe the Kriegsmarine didn't had many new technologies, still they demonstrated how to blow the Hood, and their subs how to starve your whole country supplies. Look at your troops didn't had a proper designed helmed...the Germans were dressed "to kill". You English can't accept when a nation is superior than yours. That's your problem, you sub estimate your enemies. Well.. with the Germans your leaders realized that they were no joke.
@HDPinkFloyd5 жыл бұрын
fly the damn thing !!!!!
@Commander_Nathan3 жыл бұрын
didn't you see the title? engine sound, not flying it
@micfail23 жыл бұрын
Fly it? Are you insane? Not only would the pilot be risking his life, he would be risking the destruction of an irreplaceable piece of history, at present there are only three me-262s in existence that can fly, although all of them are equipped with updated engines for safety reasons. As a great man once said, "it belongs in a museum!"
@FarmsVilla3 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Fly it ffs!
@barryaiello31273 жыл бұрын
@@micfail2 It was properly restored and is a flying example. Plenty of P-51's and Spitfire's around that are 100% airworthy and regularly flown.
@micfail23 жыл бұрын
@@barryaiello3127 part of its restoration was replacing the engines with more modern recreation versions so that it would not be a life-ending experience to ignite the engines. look it up. That doesn't change the fact that it is one of only three examples of that aircraft in the entire world that is capable of flying, actually flying it would be incredibly irresponsible and short-sighted. It belongs in a museum, not in the sky. There are hundreds of examples of operational p-51s and spitfires, many of them privately owned. In fact, Harrison Ford crash landed one on a golf course. A historical aircraft that we have hundreds or thousands of operational examples of is one thing. A historical aircraft which we only have three operational examples of in the entire world is a totally different story. Lifting that aircraft off the runway would be a crime of epic proportions, nearly as bad as isis demolishing ancient Persian ruins. I guess we should not expect Germans to understand that, they are too obsessed with their guilt to have even a basic understanding of the historical value of artifacts.
@chr0min0id5 жыл бұрын
“It’s as if the angels were pushing” - Adolf Galland
@eeee01015 жыл бұрын
@@TheInternationalBlackLipPlate what the fuck
@niewissen99125 жыл бұрын
Close.....it was aliens giving them the technology at that time according to the ancient alien theory and secret documents that was released. Even Wernher von Braun had said that was the case
@KevinPetrusNL5 жыл бұрын
Rather demons than angels I'd reckon...
@gbner99914 жыл бұрын
*Es ist, als wenn ein Engel schiebt.
@SuperDachshund4 жыл бұрын
I read his biography "Fighter General." One of the most interesting biographies I've ever read.
@otisobl4 жыл бұрын
My dad trained as a pilot on this plane but he eventually got sick, and had to leave the school. That might have been the best thing that could happen as not many ME262 pilots survived.
@robichj3 жыл бұрын
They never survived because it was near the end of the war, so they were very out numbered by the allies. But if this plane was invented at the beginning of the war, then it would be a whole different story.
@pashakdescilly75173 жыл бұрын
@@robichj Most of the Me262 pilots died as a result of problems with the plane. It was dangerous like the Me-163 Komet
@TheMegaPingasMobile3 жыл бұрын
@@pashakdescilly7517 Allies focused on attacking these planes while lifting off/landing, most were destroyed this way actually iirc
@zzaronn3 жыл бұрын
@@pashakdescilly7517 that's urban legend made by the american
@Ricecookerrrrrrrrrrr3 жыл бұрын
@@zzaronn No it isn’t the fan blades in the plane where weak due to lack of matierials goering used them wrong and didn’t make enough and the pilots save for the aces didn’t even know how to fly them
@AllTheBestCO5 жыл бұрын
The Messerschmitt Me 262 was way ahead of its time. This was a project designed/created for the future -- back then. Amazing.
@leneanderthalien4 жыл бұрын
not realy: the design from the me 262 had a very weak from landing gear, bad canons, very unreliable engines and with major aerodynamic problems (tail who make the aircraft uncontrolable over 950km/h): tthis explain why the Me 262 was never copied...
@scorchclasstitan67274 жыл бұрын
analyste that’s because the materials were weak moron
@scorchclasstitan67274 жыл бұрын
analyste and never copied ? Stop commenting kid my brain can’t take you’re biased pie hole
@The1RedRooster4 жыл бұрын
@@leneanderthalien Still had an Impressive kill-count.
@marrvynswillames49754 жыл бұрын
@@scorchclasstitan6727 the only true copy were an japanese prototype and the mig-9, who was descarted in favor of the mig15, who was based in British design
@satriamarshall3124 жыл бұрын
"German science is the world's finest!" - Rudol von Stroheim
@emotown14 жыл бұрын
Interesting name, sort of like Rudolf but with no L
@satriamarshall3124 жыл бұрын
@@emotown1 Actually i made a typo lol. His actual name is Rudol
@emotown14 жыл бұрын
@@satriamarshall312 Just googled the name to check. That's a most weird rabbit hole you led me down!
@KingSaheb00794 жыл бұрын
@@emotown1 Speaking of Rabbit Holes, Allow Me to Introduce You to a Little Something Called “Hololive” Peko Dayo.
@deadly24074 жыл бұрын
@@KingSaheb0079 son of a bitch
@davecrupel28174 жыл бұрын
A detailed breakdown for all you eager young minds that like to analyze. Along with context and reasoning herr and there. 0:21 the Marshal pays close attention to the #2 engine and relevant structuring to make sure all is well. Meanwhile the starter is accelerating the engine towards self-operating power. 0:24 flame-on. Engine is brought up to flight idle power (or maybe a bit less. Varies from plane to plane) to provide air/electrical power to start engine #1. Observe the thermal-air distortion above the main landing gear wheel. 0:54 the pilot is requesting the Fire Marshal's permission to begin starting sequence for Engine #1. The Marshal gives the all-clear as he moves because he knows it's safe to start. 1:00 listen closely. You can hear Engine #2's rpm drop slightly as it's load is suddenly increased by spooling up Engine #1. Same thing happens in your car when you turn the air conditioning on. More load on the engine, more work for it to do. Doesn't harm it of course, but slows it down slightly. If that engine were left on ground idle, the load would overwhelm it and slow the turbines down, heating them up VERY quickly. And stalling the compressor. Which is a turbine's equivalent of a "backfire." And THAT would not be a fun time for the Fire Marshal. So the pilot must raise the power, RPMs, and air flow to handle that load. 1:08 Flame-on Engine #1. Slight lag in rpm increase, (known as a hung start) but it catches up quick enough for a safe, successful start. No more fire risks, so the Marshal does away with the extinguisher.
@richardb43134 жыл бұрын
You do realise these aren't Jumo's. What you hear is 2 General Electric CJ610's starting up.
@davecrupel28173 жыл бұрын
@@richardb4313 Who are you talking to? I see no mentions, of what engines are being used, anywhere.
@marvindebot3264 Жыл бұрын
@@richardb4313 What he is describing is the standard start procedure for any jet turbine engine. it matters not what type they are.
@richardb4313 Жыл бұрын
@@davecrupel2817 Really? I have to explain this? The video heading says "Messerschmitt Me 262 / engine start / original sound". Most folk would think that means this is what original 262's sounded like starting up.
@richardb4313 Жыл бұрын
@@marvindebot3264 "Messerschmitt Me 262 / engine start / original sound"
@martinolsen82713 жыл бұрын
Still to this day a beautiful plane, The Schwalbe is still a great design.
@FractAlkemist5 жыл бұрын
I have always thought this is THE COOLEST looking fighter jet of all time, then or now! Awesome sound too!
@Dowlphin4 жыл бұрын
What I like about small turbines is that they make you believe they have reached maximum speed, but then you realize they have only just woken up. Then a giant explosion of enegy occurs and you think they're flying apart any moment now but then you realize they have reached idle rev. 😄
@carmenmiranda41082 жыл бұрын
Ah the Germans, a country of engineering. So sad used by a twisted government. When you look at my Porsche you can see it still today. My Dad told me once landed in Normandy our soldiers just marveled at the Tiger and Panther tanks next our Sherman. Good think they had so few of them.
@Dowlphin2 жыл бұрын
@@carmenmiranda4108 I like to joke about how important good field radio quality is. Imagine if someone had confused "German tank" and "Sherman tank".
@mambagr Жыл бұрын
Big ones are mostly the same.
@Dowlphin Жыл бұрын
@@mambagr Personally I never got that impression from airliner turbines. I was actually surprised by how timid they sound when taking off with full throttle. But I also know the extreme end of model turbines, so that's my standard. Good examples: B-52 R/C Flight kzbin.info/www/bejne/qHyxgmSKp7V7jMk Fastest RC turbine model jet: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eoGqdXSQrrZnas0m25s
@KSCPMark674210 жыл бұрын
Well, I think it's a little misleading to say "original sound"... This aircraft is a replica, powered by a pair of General Electric CJ610 engines, so the sound is probably different that the original Junkers Jumo 004 engines. The old engines were far too unreliable for it to make any sense to use them today.
@carlf477410 жыл бұрын
Really? WTF? Misleading? How about the historical significance? This is an awesome video and what better example to teach our present generation about WW2 aviation. It was of course, primitive technology and had it been applied earlier, could have changed world history. So get of the "knit-pick" and see it for what it is...damn!
@devilsadvocate254810 жыл бұрын
Depends on what defines a 'replica'. I would say more a reproduction. IIRC the project to build the small batch of 262s was so authentic in construction etc (only changes made to aircraft were safety/reglatory changes like deleting the front wheel brake) that the Messerschmitt foundation gave them approval to use airframe 'werk'/serial numbers that continued on from the last wartime airframe produced. They were even given their own 'c' designation that referred to the GE J85 engine used.
@Jester123ish10 жыл бұрын
Carl F Yes, it is misleading to say "original sound".
@devilsadvocate25489 жыл бұрын
soaringtractor yes they did!
@cristobalcardona55927 жыл бұрын
J-85 For the military Folks!
@AvaToyShow3 жыл бұрын
Like the Ho 229, or the Tiger tank, it looked `right`. Sometimes you can trust aesthetics.
@pashakdescilly75173 жыл бұрын
With the minor issue that the plane was no use as a fighter - interceptor, but not a fighter. It was no good at maneuvering, and could not be throttled up or down. Pilots of the lumbering Wellington bomber were advised to turn sharp left if under attack by the Me262. Yes, a heavy bomber could play turns with this 'fighter' plane.
@stephenbirks64583 жыл бұрын
Aesthetics should be taught a school ! - My / Our old tutor would contstantly tell us at college Back in the late 1970s
@jupitermoongauge40553 жыл бұрын
Not sure about that. It kind of looks like a bottom feeding fish with wings.
@_AnanasIEgenJuice_3 жыл бұрын
@@pashakdescilly7517 No, a Wellington cant outturn a Me262. What probably happened is that the Me262 would close at a very high speed compared to the bomber and that high speed already freezes the controls to some extent. Secondly the armament of the Me262 was low velocity 30mm cannons that were difficult to aim because the pilots had to lead their target a lot and only had very low aiming windows because of the high speed of the plane. Secondly, you cant tell your aircrew that they cant do anything against the enemy and still expect them to keep morals up. Instead tell them that if you try a sharp turn you will make it, even though its probably pretty futile. If you were to measure the time it takes a Wellington bomber and a Me262 to do a 360 turn at their most maneuveable speed the Me262 would be far superior for obvious reasons
@TallTav3 жыл бұрын
I loved the Kalinin K-7s and K-12s. Couple of my favorite experimental german bombers.
@bebobism3 жыл бұрын
I'm Dutch and we got invaded by the Germans in WW II , but I love their innovative capability. I'ts just awesome ! . . . By the way , nowadays they're the most friendly people you'll ever meet. 😎
@tanamly3 жыл бұрын
They were always like that... just not their government at the time.
@peers11113 жыл бұрын
heel erg bedankt from Berlin
@bubbajoe16112 жыл бұрын
Until their not.
@bebobism2 жыл бұрын
@@bubbajoe1611 Well Joe we Dutch aren't holier than the pope here. In 1672 we ate a minister because we didnt like his 'politics'. 😏
@TrafficDE2 жыл бұрын
@@bebobism I mean, you're not you when you're hungry xD
@mattbates68875 жыл бұрын
When I was a kid, the Me 262 was the first jet I built from an Airfix kit. The twin under wing jet design and light grey and dark green dappled camouflage scheme, really caught my imagination. Still looks and sounds pretty impressive!
@eyesjamesq3 жыл бұрын
Ein ganz besonderes Flugzeug, das der Konkurrenz weit voraus ist. Es klingt immer noch schön, wenn Sie es anzünden und schwebt wie ein Vogel.
@tarasbulba31903 жыл бұрын
I wonder what the allies thought when they first heard this thing. It looks like a shark. Just beautiful!👍
@MauriatOttolink3 жыл бұрын
Stepan Bandera. Shark was its German nickname. Der Haifische. It's German model name was Das Schwalbe...The Swallow.
@deckdeckard52973 жыл бұрын
So true. I've never seen any plane looking so much like a shark.
@MauriatOttolink3 жыл бұрын
@@deckdeckard5297 It was even more "sharkish looking " before they removed the dragging tail wheel and made it into a tricycle landing gear. It's problem was the lack of high temperature metals for the turbine. Engines had to come out service after only a very few flying hours .
@deckdeckard52973 жыл бұрын
@@MauriatOttolink Well, I did not even know the Me 262 had been first built with a conventional landing gear. Thanks for the info.
@robertcolvin50458 жыл бұрын
The engines are not original, the original engines had two cycle piston starting engines with pull cords mounted in the front of the engines.
@DandSCreations8 жыл бұрын
thanks you, I was wondering where the hell the pull starts were.
@cmdrantezscar33687 жыл бұрын
they put in more modern engines because they wanted to save the original engines, also, gen 1 Jet engines took along time to spin up and spin down so it whould be harder to take of and land with the original engines. so they chose more modern and more powerfull engines. kinda shame but i can understand them.
@DandSCreations7 жыл бұрын
Plus original motors only last 50 hours
@ivanrakaric98597 жыл бұрын
and for pilots own life, that old engines are not to be trusted, and you need to remeber when they were produced, its kinda old stuff now... :)
@LeoA26007 жыл бұрын
They didn't have original engines to save. This is a modern reproduction, one of five finished decade or so ago under the auspices of the Me-262 Project.
@marcooliva27475 жыл бұрын
Me 262 " I'm sexy and I know it "
@steveallred13304 жыл бұрын
You have to give Germany credit they were way ahead of their time
@pawelsawicki17504 жыл бұрын
Get a scientists to laboratory, lock them down making sure they know, that their lives and lives of their loved ones depend on success and you got your technological breakthrough...
@fredericadda4 жыл бұрын
In engineering maybe. Morally they were ages behind.
@doyoumakeittotheclouddistr41324 жыл бұрын
German engineering is one of the finest.
@doyoumakeittotheclouddistr41324 жыл бұрын
@Nonya Buziness not really
@ScienceChap4 жыл бұрын
No they weren't.
@vinzklortho30133 жыл бұрын
I can’t imagine what the first pilots must have felt hearing and flying these things for the first time.
@jimmylight48662 жыл бұрын
Like Angels pushing you. A. Galland
@richardwirt319310 жыл бұрын
it is still one of the greatest looking airplanes ever made it looks like a shark
@unionrdr6 жыл бұрын
I agree. Very aerodynamic looking. The main body section is not unlike a fishing lure to my eyes. Had to cut through the air quite smoothly!?
@ryanducharme75055 жыл бұрын
Actually that's where they got the idea from for the design of the body, was a sharks body
@dodibenabba13785 жыл бұрын
It was nicknamed the Schwalbe which is German for Swallow, personally I think the name Sturmvogel sums it up perfectly..Storm Bird.
@Berserkk757 жыл бұрын
Its start up is so epic, this jet is the pride of the *german manufacture*
@FairladyS1307 жыл бұрын
Except that the engines are not German lol
@Alte.Kameraden9 жыл бұрын
Still to me the most beautiful Jet Fighter of the 1940s.
@CDiggy7 жыл бұрын
Well there is about 5 to choose from so...
@pokeyrailfanning5 жыл бұрын
Kameraden it’s more beatiful than any jet fighter all the modern jets suck because one tracking missile and the enemy is done there is no combat at all just missiles.
@dankovac16095 жыл бұрын
@@pokeyrailfanning but when it comes to avoiding those missiles... And they do have guns and they do spray each other with them. Although i get your point, WW2 dogfights we're a damn sport, and i do prefer those.
@shayden42965 жыл бұрын
I prefer horten 229 but this one is also great
@i_smoke_ghosts5 жыл бұрын
@@CDiggy classic dude thank you!
@leelauder44113 жыл бұрын
Miles ahead of everything as usual for the brilliant German engineering!
@TrakThora3 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah and now incapable of engineering a new german jet fighter.
@youraveragescotsman71193 жыл бұрын
Actually it wasn't that advanced. The Allies had their own Jets in development and, had Germany not pushed out a literal prototype that needed more testing, the Allies might have had their Jets out first. The 262 was pretty shit. Too little and too late. Most of the engines weren't built yet, they were horrendously unreliable and 2/3 of the pilots weren't even trained fully with it.
@Roger-mz4lx5 жыл бұрын
A buddy of mine has a collie with 4 dark dots on her nose that looks just like the gun ports on the ME 262 so I call her my Luftwaffe girl and she seems to like that.
@AndrewTubbiolo5 жыл бұрын
How does she smell?
@JustJohn5055 жыл бұрын
@@AndrewTubbiolo like jet fuel and Volkswagen 😌
@Tugboatpb5 жыл бұрын
Like crayons
@ajhiep44474 жыл бұрын
@@Tugboatpb lol
@paoloviti615610 жыл бұрын
Very cool bird! Yes I'm still impressed how clean was the Me-262 to be 70 years ago! Probably the original Jumo was more noisy and less high pitched because of it's lower rpm compared to the modern jets and of course far more temperamental to nurse around because of it's chronic lack of high quality alloys! But despite all those engines were very well built even up to the end and who flew those airplanes all said that it's flying quality was very good! Perhaps it's biggest drawback was the lack of air breaks because of the difficult handling of it's engine and it's unstable flight characteristic at top speed! But that was shared with almost all the early jet fighters! All in all an impressive airplane!
@FiveCentsPlease9 жыл бұрын
Should be able to compare the sound of a Jumo soon, unless there are unforseen problems. Here is a rebuilt Jumo, with some upgrades to the alloys: facebook.com/video.php?v=10152841379843666&set=vb.13883518665&type=2&theater
@paoloviti61569 жыл бұрын
FiveCentsPlease really thank you very much! I'm very curious to hear the real sound of the Jumo engine!
@paoloviti61569 жыл бұрын
FiveCentsPlease just saw the link! Very exciting! But I can hear that there is still some problems beyond the Reidler starter that making some racket! It is probably a question of adjusting here and there but nevertheless those guys did a hell of a good job!
@paoloviti61569 жыл бұрын
***** I understand some german and I know that it was called "Schwalbe" but it is a semi-official name!
@Elodea9 жыл бұрын
We had a running Jumo 004 engine at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, back in the late 1960's. I guarantee that you've never heard a turbine engine running and producing anything like the very strange sound of a 004. Nothing at all like the sound of a modern turbine engine.
@nicholaspatton55906 жыл бұрын
Did it sound like Polka?
@kiril1357906 жыл бұрын
its not the real engine, its a new modern one
@calvinnyala95805 жыл бұрын
So, how does it sound? More of a whosh than high pitch modern whine?
@LemmingOverlord5 жыл бұрын
@@nicholaspatton5590 It sounded like "Deutschland uber alles" in stereo
@josephcrider22805 жыл бұрын
I was there In Miami at Embry Riddle 1962 when we got the engine running.
@stealthg35infiniti943 жыл бұрын
Got to see one first hand in the German Air Museum in Munich. It was very impressive along with its rocket pods. Along side of it was an ME 109. This is a must visit for an aviation aficionado.
@IC3DZOMBIE5 жыл бұрын
Crazy just how much those engines changed the world
@jacksonville6674 жыл бұрын
IC3D ZOMBIE Not that one specifically though, had something like 30 hours until it burned itself out.
@kakhak5 жыл бұрын
Crazy outstanding machine for 40's! This is just phenomenal. Ahead of its time for dozens of years.
@dmitrijkuznetsov80534 жыл бұрын
2040J. Этим азиатам и не снилось что мы делали. Факт. Будут возражать: мы их уёбищ что добровольно трудились в Германии размажем..
@jacksonville6674 жыл бұрын
British came in I think in 1944 or 1945 with the Meteor, but by god this thing looks so much better.
@reaktroyt79896 жыл бұрын
And this is from WWII. Amazing! 🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪
@wwhb47803 жыл бұрын
ROTFL it was built in 2006. It is as authentic as the Tyrannosaurus Rex in "Jurassic Park".
@elijah51993 жыл бұрын
It's all fun and games until the pilot murmurs "hail hydra" before taking off
@zachboyd47494 жыл бұрын
“Oops, the engine have been running for 10 minutes straight already! Oh well, time to completely rebuild them!”
@midgetman42064 жыл бұрын
You made it to 10 minutes? What, you stealing from the the fuel "reserves"?
@FlyLeah3 жыл бұрын
Are you american by chance?
@zachboyd47493 жыл бұрын
@funkyleah Yeah I'm American, why?
@michealdeacons78203 жыл бұрын
10 minutes? That’s pretty generous
@tyree90553 жыл бұрын
Actually they had a service life of 24 hours before they needed to be rebuilt.
@c-3po374 жыл бұрын
German engineering has always been incredible.
@stripervince13 жыл бұрын
Not really. I had a BMW and it was a piece of shit
@AL_THOMAS_7773 жыл бұрын
@@stripervince1 YUP. The incredibility is g o n e - sadly. Look at Great Britain as example. Once leading in almost e v e r y t h i n g and now take a look today, how sad: Only the "city of London" and these crude, fxckxng money-shyte bizzyness . . .WHAT a d e c l i n e . . .Germany now too like BMW as you mentioned!
@peturdobrev11963 жыл бұрын
👍 YES! GREETINGS FROM BULGARIA 🇧🇬
@JoshPhoenix113 жыл бұрын
Those same engineers became NASA in Operation Paperclip.
@Surpriseify3 жыл бұрын
@@AL_THOMAS_777 How is British engineering not still incredible? Also whats wrong with the Germans? what you think Pakistan is the new wonderchild? Who even comes close to these nations? If you say Russia or China you are sadly beyond saving. Russia cant even produce computer parts, China is catching up but at this point they can produce a chip roughly matching what the West could produce 10 years ago. Computers are everything in modern warfare.
@ChevyBM4 жыл бұрын
These are beautiful fighters!
@frankpolo20883 жыл бұрын
Glorious Messerschmitt,what a start up ,smooth as you wish for.
@arktis69904 жыл бұрын
And remember kids, this plane was made in desperation, think about if it wasn’t made in desperation and all of the arms you would be fully extending at a 45 degree angle
@thegodfather_84554 жыл бұрын
The planes concept was envisioned in the 30s soo
@arktis69904 жыл бұрын
@@thegodfather_8455 ye Ik, but it was the same with the rocket propelled planes, they were only entering production when Germany needed them
@Indo-Sama7774 жыл бұрын
Willy was trying to design the 262 to be perfect for quite a while.
@voyager22303 жыл бұрын
And the germans win and alternate history from man in the high castle become true
@Indo-Sama7773 жыл бұрын
Not to mention the plane was being designed in the late 30's, just that desperation sped up that process but not enough to have an impact on the outcome of the war
@theWebkinzkitty8 жыл бұрын
Original 004 used a 22hp 2 stroke piston engine as the starter, they used a pull ring at the front of the motor. This is a modern Jet engine starting. I would really love to her an original 004 start.
Germans did not put hour meters on those Jets, They did not expect them to survive more than a few combat missions. Which is also why they were only designed to last 20 hours. Cost per unit would have been increased considerably with higher quality metals.
@FiveCentsPlease8 жыл бұрын
Lester Maxx Nearly every plane (piston or jet) used a log book, not an hour meter. Lack of strategic materials was not intentional for Germany. Some of the test engines from Jumo that were made with better metals were reaching 100 hours before overhaul, and the US Army Air Force evaluation documents of captured jet engines mention that the Germans had synthesized a new metal alloy that would have been used in the engines to increase life, but it was too late in the war to go into production.
@theWebkinzkitty8 жыл бұрын
Motors could be pulled and replaced, Germans knew these Jet Engines were only good for 20 hours.
@b43xoit3 жыл бұрын
Was the starting engine integral to the plane? And what kind of transmission linked it to the jet engine?
@IDiggSocialMedia5 жыл бұрын
WW 2's best looking aircraft and my favorite, along with the He-280 jet and the Japanese Shinden canard!
@petervonhoven44013 жыл бұрын
Dieses geniale Flugzeug, hätte damals früher fertig sein sein müssen. Und mit großer Stückzahl.
@whitetiger20488 жыл бұрын
beautiful aircraft
@theaviator13288 жыл бұрын
Whitetiger
@whitetiger20488 жыл бұрын
+The Aviator yes?
@goldeneagle32186 жыл бұрын
Shark.
@MIronLance4 жыл бұрын
I can't even imagine the reactions of the piston engine ground crews and pilots on first hearing one these start up.
@maxik79296 жыл бұрын
Amazing! Реально круто! Живая история.
@dragoncarver2873 жыл бұрын
My Dad was in Europe during that conflict. He was checking out some skid marks on the Autobahn. He said "What could have been going on here?" So he started looking and checking. He found a brand new Me262 camouflaged off to one side. They were using the Autobahn for a runway. The skid marks were from landing. He said he went up to it and rubbed his hand on the leading edge. "You didn't dare do any more than that. It might have been boobytrapped." I went to an airshow and looked at an A10. I rubbed the leading edge and remembered him and his story.
@norbertovendeto45304 жыл бұрын
Heute ist es immer noch sagenhaft... Man kann wirklich nur staunen!
@Cobaltthoriumg9 жыл бұрын
man those twin engines are like Mozart and Wagner in love to my ears, if airplanes were like girls, I def marry this firecracker
@bbb462cid7 жыл бұрын
:) General Electric engines
@roberth.goddardthefatherof63767 жыл бұрын
omfg biggest wehraboo i've ever seen!
@mikewisdom41657 жыл бұрын
Bloody stunning the usa have built two new ones for display only the yanks would do this shame us brits dont get our ass in gear and dothe same ps in 1962 when i was 15 uk sold of hurricanes and spitfires at 25 pound with one flight out
@augustopinochet24956 жыл бұрын
I just had an idea for a new Japanese dating sim...
@gorillaump58696 жыл бұрын
Bob Montague....OK, that's an odd comment.
@thegeneral5655 жыл бұрын
"The first true turbo jet engine. The last hope for the Luftwaffe" medal of honor PSX 👍🏼
@josecolon27174 жыл бұрын
He-178 was first... why does everyone forget about the 178
@angelarainey72583 жыл бұрын
My father was a Spitfire pilot and was the only allied pilot to fly an ME262 from Belgium to a England at the end of the war and land it safely. I have his account, his Log Books and the editorial evidence. They had an interpreter on the first day to talk about technical things and my father sent a bottle of wine to his room that night to say thank you - he was not allowed to eat in the mess - the next day it turned out he spoke perfect English so the interpretor wasn't needed and they could talk pilot to pilot. He was an amazing man.
@vadokunvot5 жыл бұрын
Such a beauty, good thing that the nazis didnt get it out in time and in greater numbers though. But still, a marvel of German design that one can only admire.
@glizzygordon53955 жыл бұрын
vadokunvot even if they did get a good amount of them, jet fuel would have been a big obstacle
@mathiasrryba5 жыл бұрын
The engines were pretty bad too. Basically you'd need to install fresh new engines after every flight or two, else you'd risk catching fire midflight from engine failure.
@vadokunvot5 жыл бұрын
@@mathiasrryba yes, they couldent get the right materials for the engines due to the cause of the war. Dont remember what they used but it could not withstand the heat so good.
@chaowingchinghongfingshong31095 жыл бұрын
@@mathiasrryba One flight takes 40 hours for you?
@mathiasrryba5 жыл бұрын
@@chaowingchinghongfingshong3109 the of these jumos would break after 10
@mr.nibblenips42316 жыл бұрын
Imagine if the Third Reich had 10,000 of these around 1941...
@chadthundercock48066 жыл бұрын
AR Hamidi this plane was a fighter bomber, it delayed production but it could preform close air support, although 10,000 of these are completely useless if you don’t have fuel, which was the German situation.
@gordon43856 жыл бұрын
Then they would have needed 10000 more pilots.
@unphazed_6 жыл бұрын
Rip oil reserves.
@blainegoodwin63656 жыл бұрын
They'd all get blown out of the sky. They didn't stand a chance against a p51
@TitovIgorBro6 жыл бұрын
JetfireWithy Your father could survive + you wouldn’t exist... Hmm... Is your mother jewish?
@Astora_3453 жыл бұрын
I'm feeling the power of its engine's sounds
@friendofcoal3 жыл бұрын
Vielen Dank for posting. To see one on static display is one thing, but to actually hear one is a real bonus...
@Medmann489 жыл бұрын
I urge you to read Adolf Galland's book "The First & The Last". In the book he writes what it was like to fly the ME262, the smooth liftoff & wonderful power. He said you could not help but find it easy to shoot down bombers with it because it had 30MM cannon which would chew up a B-17 pretty easy. He laments in the book that they did not have the ME262 sooner in the war, if they had theallies would have been in big trouble.
@1993Crag8 жыл бұрын
If they had the 262 earlier then the Luftwaffe would have been crippled from its maintenance issues.
@gw76247 жыл бұрын
You could also say the Germans would have been in (more) trouble if the British government had funded development of the jet engine from its invention by Frank Whittle.
@frittsm64177 жыл бұрын
If it had so much power on takeoff, why did the Luftwaffe have piston driven fighter fly top cover on take off and landing.
@SteveZiomekAFA896 жыл бұрын
You can have all the power you want on takeoff. You are still slow. The best time to shoot down an aircraft is when it is at 130-150 kts with its gear hanging. A FW190 could kill a Raptor if the F-22 is just taking off. That's why the Luftwaffe had prop fighters covering their takeoff.
@locutus1556 жыл бұрын
I believe that Galland also said that the best jet fighter never made would be the Me262 airframe with the Rolls Royce engine of the Gloster Meteor, as those engines were more reliable and had fewer problems than the Jumo 004 units that the Me262 airframe was fitted with.
@daskarman5 жыл бұрын
German engineering Marvel Love it! 👍
@jiridvorak3 жыл бұрын
This is Spitfire of Luftwaffe.....Neverending beauty !
@tomm52563 жыл бұрын
I love how he pats the wing. Ground crew love.
@wolfleader37274 жыл бұрын
this is one of my Fav aircraft love the 190 and the 262
@flak88424 жыл бұрын
Same here
@maxw52293 жыл бұрын
This thing is just beatiful to watch and hear.
@Talltrees843 жыл бұрын
Itimidating to see and hear. Many an Allied pilot probably s$%t in their pants after seeing what this thing could do. After being confused seeing no props. Still too little too late for the Germans. They needed to have delayed the war for another two years, build up their more conventional weapons and further perfected wonder weapons like this (and make more of them).
@groupcaptainbonzo4 жыл бұрын
Very smooth, very Modern for “original” sound
@eanayayo4 жыл бұрын
No one in a healthy mind would use Jumo 004 or BMW 003, it's too dangerous.
@flak88424 жыл бұрын
@@eanayayo wait Dangerous ? How it is dangerous it is jet engine Do you mean than any instant change of the throttle would damage the engine ?
@leneanderthalien4 жыл бұрын
@@flak8842 maximum TBO from the original engines was 25 hours ,but the most explode before (...) The engines use on the museum reproduction Me 262 are General electric CJ610 engines...
@alexmidu58904 жыл бұрын
uses j85 engines, jumo litterally explodes cuz it was sooooo hot
@larrysmith67974 жыл бұрын
It's a replica with General Electric CJ610 engines.
@j.d.peppmeier90413 жыл бұрын
My dad was a B-24 pilot, shot down, and a POW at Stalag Luft I . There was an adjacent Luftwaffe base and the "kriegies" saw the Me262 fly. Very impressive ! Still a good-looking airplane !
@saeidyazdani5 жыл бұрын
Simply wow! Some countries can not make something like this even now in 2020 :))
@flak88424 жыл бұрын
If the 262 wasn't invented along with the 163 The modern world today won't be able to discover both of jet engines and rocket engines They would still use the post war piston engine planes
@josephastier74214 жыл бұрын
The steam turbine was invented in 1884. A jet engine is the same idea in reverse, creating fluid flow from power. Someone else would have hit upon that idea eventually.
@ИсомидинАхмеджанов4 жыл бұрын
The nose seems like smiling saying "Propell dudes, hold my shnapsz" :) Seriously, it is smiling :))))
@akifhossain51224 жыл бұрын
"If you want the best...you buy German" -Ahoy (Video: MP5)
@imadethischanneltocomment7674 жыл бұрын
Engine goes kaputt after 7 hours
@midgetman42064 жыл бұрын
@@imadethischanneltocomment767 wow, you made it all the way to the engine? The actuators usually fail before then
@tinycockjock19674 жыл бұрын
To be fair if anyone says the Me-262 was a good plane is braindead. The upkeep costs too much and the service life of most component is not months, not weeks, not days, but hours. You’d have to be a new kind of insane to even think it’s a good aircraft. Kill ratio and speed alone don’t win wars.
@xwormwood4 жыл бұрын
@@tinycockjock1967 If your argument would be correct, all US Stealth Fighter would "insane" as well.
@bh86714 жыл бұрын
@@tinycockjock1967 only brain dead person here is you with your complete ignorance and stupidity and brainwashed American propaganda.
@HowardJohnstone3 жыл бұрын
The Engine sound is NOT Jumo 004B but GE CJ610 as this is a modern replica from the Stormbird´s project. Modern replicas was/is the only way to fly an ME262 today. This engine has a great safety record and will provide for stunning aerobatics should this be asked for!
@FiveCentsPlease3 жыл бұрын
+ HowardJohnstone Paul Allen invested his money to rebuild his museum's original Me-262 with reworked Jumo turbines, with plans for short flights. But all work and projects at his museum are currently stopped after he passed away. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fIHEq6h8hr94adE
@HowardJohnstone3 жыл бұрын
@@FiveCentsPlease Excellent, this IS the real Jumo 004B sound!
@olehhumeniuk16325 жыл бұрын
The most aesthetically beautiful plane 2WW
@stevencramsie91725 жыл бұрын
The Spitfire might want a word.
@Giovanni_Dortona4 ай бұрын
I agree
@Giovanni_Dortona4 ай бұрын
@@stevencramsie9172The Spitfire has to catch up first
@lexus80183 жыл бұрын
This thing looks so good.
@kodiak643 жыл бұрын
The idea is you're meant to have tech like this at the START of WW2, not at at the end.
@kiwihame3 жыл бұрын
Damn clever bastards! Watching that must've been quite surreal in 1944. Like a flying White Shark. I bet they were terrifying in action, with all those Mk.108s blazing away. Impressive.
@rhendrickson8863 жыл бұрын
Stunningly beautiful design. I've always wondered if the designers studied the shape of sharks when figuring this aircraft out.
@marvindebot3264 Жыл бұрын
Indeed they did.
@manofthematch446 жыл бұрын
sounds like my vacuum.
@AnimatedAirlines6 жыл бұрын
lol
@plutoniumpie6 жыл бұрын
Means yer hose is clogged
@alecfoster44136 жыл бұрын
scorpion_ggwp- B-29's never saw action in the European theater. And P-51s shot these vacuums as they would take off. Beautiful and innovative plane but too little too late for the 3rd Reich. Also, isn't that a reproduction using Pratt & Whitney engines?
@vteckikdinyoo6 жыл бұрын
Alec Foster wouldnt the p51s get hit by some kind of anti aircraft defence ?
@AndreasWernerReiske6 жыл бұрын
Haha ... so Your vacuum is made in Germany !??
@cos-sin-tan-std-dui-fbi-uti-hi3 жыл бұрын
My grandpa had a panic attack when I played in the next room.
@mohabatkhanmalak11613 жыл бұрын
Beautiful, Made in Germany. The Japanese also took some design elements of the Me 262 and built their version of a high altitude interceptor and bomber for the Navy called the Nakajima Kikka. Its wings were slightly shorter and it used the landing gear of the Mitsubishi Zero.