Metal Gear Solid 3 Remake Looks INCREDIBLE But I am SKEPTICAL | Metal Gear Solid Delta : Snake Eater

[@AlexAdrift]

Do you trust Konami? Let me know.

[@olechristianhenne6583]

If they can reboot mgs ops and peace. Walker including mgs 1 mgs2 Inn the NES TITLES

[@liquidcnake]

@@olechristianhenne6583 not NES, they have to remake the ORIGINAL MSX games.

[@vijaydizzle]

nope

[@Mankey619]

As much I don’t trust them in their Silent Hill 2 Remake. The same goes to this one too.

[@AssClown-wi6og]

I do but I don’t trust BLM

[@Maxekarn17]

About the Fox Engine, since the game is made by a third-party company, and that you need an authorization for using it, they might just wanna hold on an engine they are more familiar with. + the Fox Engine is now a 10 years old engine that might not fulfill todays expectation wether it's about the physics or the particle effects.

[@AlexAdrift]

True, we don't know the state of the Fox Engine. Regardless, Unreal Engine does look great so far.

[@justsolid3201]

@@AlexAdrift Iirc the Fox Engine was discontinued in 2020. It does make sense when you realize the fact that the devs had a hard time using it along with the fact there probably weren't enough veterans to train new employees on the engine.

[@AlexAdrift]

@@justsolid3201 Yeah, maybe focusing on Unreal Engine is the best step forward. Hopefully this marks a positive new direction for the company. Would love to see Metal gear, Castlevania, and Silent Hill all return to their former glory.

[@olechristianhenne6583]

It wood not matter since hideo didn't even work on it anyways rumors of 3rd zone of the enders sounds nice that regard

[@pliskinboi]

The fox engine has its limitations. Just try to have the realistic dripping effects or environmental reforming happen. The fox engine was insane for its time but it's showing it's age.

[@AlexAdrift]

I'm sure it's in need of improvements. I have no problems with them moving onto Unreal, I just think its weird to leave your in-house engine to waste. Either way, the game looks fantastic so far.

[@DarkWatcher149]

Another KZbinr once talked about the remake of MGS3 might look generic graphically when the UE is used, as many other games use the same engine. The Fox Engine, on the other hand, was an engine made especially for a Metal Gear game. I know, it's already a little old, but why not improve it or create an engine just for the remake? Dude, you deserve more subscribers. Great content.

[@AlexAdrift]

Thank you! and yeah, letting Fox Engine go to waste seems like a bad move in retrospect, but, unreal might be good as well. Only time will tell.

[@WongHoDaddy]

I’m hoping it’s going to be everything I want it to, I’m expecting doggy doodoo

[@tntevilutionguy]

When i first saw the trailer i really thought it was fox engine, but i wasn't disappointed at all when i found out that it was on unreal! Honestly, the new engine looks damn good. Maybe they discarded fox engine because its too old or something like that.

[@tntevilutionguy]

Also, about the vol. 1 collection... I was heavily disappointed about all the issues the port had :'( I kind of see why MAYBE it doesn't feel complete, because all of Konami's work is probably aiming to delta and not the collection right now, im hoping they update the collection fixing all the issues.

[@AlexAdrift]

@@tntevilutionguy Yeah, maybe the Fox Engine sat on the sidelines to long. It is weird that despite having your own engine, you decide to use unreal, hurting your profits. Either way, Unreal Engine looks fantastic. And yeah, hopefully they can fix the collection before Vol. 2 comes out.

[@MIchaelSybi]

@@AlexAdrift Unreal is being actively developed, and since Kojima team was disbanded, it's clear Fox Engine was abandoned as well. "After seven years of use on the Pro Evolution Soccer series, Konami discontinued use of the Fox Engine in favor of Unreal Engine due to PES Productions focusing development efforts on the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X consoles"

[@butterh2]

​@@AlexAdrifti doubt anyone there knows how to use it anymore and the ones that do are either retired, at kojipro, or working somewhere else after the mgsv clusterfuck. plus it was designed for 7th and 8th gen consoles, while ue5 is meant for 8th and 9th gen, and upgrading the fox engine to modern standards may be too much effort than it's worth. still very sad they just abandoned that very capable engine they invested millions upon millions of dollars into and only used it for 2 games (not counting pes)

[@AlexAdrift]

@@butterh2 So true

[@MIchaelSybi]

I feel the same. Never trust someone who betrayed you once

[@ewanfawns547]

Regarding the game engine point. You have to keep in mind that an engine is just a tool for the developers to make a game. There's really nothing suspicious about it. I wouldn't be surprised if the change was caused by several factors including: 1. Fox engine may not have been updated for quite some time and UE5 will probably have many new useful features that Fox doesn't. 2. If they went with Fox engine, new developers on the project would have to spend time to learn it because it's an in-house engine, so going for a more known engine that has just been updated with new state of the art tech makes sense. 3. The costs of getting Fox Engine to the standard of Unreal 5 may not be worth it. It would also delay the game. The only real reasons I can think of the end user having an issue with the choice of engine is if that engine was either outdated or had a track record of producing issues for games. I think it's fine.

[@AlexAdrift]

I just think it is weird to have your own in-house engine yet let it waste away. Not to mention, lose revenue by using Unreal Engine 5. Konami has made some terrible choices in recent years, but I'm hopeful this game could be a step in the right direction. Then, we might see them restore some glory to their franchises.

[@janambro8919]

that makes sense tbh. For how pretty it looks mgsv is really bare bones as a game, that might be also a factor of the 8 years of development.

[@ewanfawns547]

@@AlexAdrift Well again, it all depends. We'll assume that at the very least, they are going for enterprise licencing. it's probably custom but then I'd just be speculating on the deal they've got with Epic. They'd be spending $1500 per seat. In the grand scheme of things, for a company like Konami, its not that big of a deal. 3D software licences costs more and they're probably spending more on that. If they go and develop Fox, they then have to spend time and money doing that and paying more engine developers. Konami is also a self publishing company, so the more time that they spend not releasing the game, the more money they basically lose. It's a common problem for many self published studios. Perhaps they think that the cost of developing the engine and the time it would take outweighs the cost of paying Epic. A game engine is a massive undertaking to both create and maintain which is why most developers use Unity or Unreal.

[@AlexAdrift]

@@ewanfawns547 Very true. It must still be lucrative in some way, plus, easier.

[@ewanfawns547]

@@AlexAdrift Absolutely. Consider mgs3 as a game in comparison to modern AAA games. It's actually kind of small. It's got roughly 60 locations and from what we've seen from the in-engine trailer, they're going to be recreating all that. I'd focus more budget into art and user experience and if UE5 as a tool helps them achieve that over Fox, more power to them.

[@TL8311-j6x]

I don't trust them. If it's as good as they're advertising, I'll wait for the post launch reviews.

[@SaionjiWorld]

All I need are outrageous camos like MGS3 snake or Old Snake or maybe even the MGS2 sneaking suit. In the same manner that they put Raiden & Grey Fox in MGSV

[@quietlightning4063]

I trust them to make it happen.. they basically took the ps3/4 HD remaster and copy/ pasted it minus peace Walker to the PS5.. and I NEED to play it again.. soon .. it’s good no matter what.. Kohima is going to squeeze us but at the end of the day.. it’s not hard to Deepfake the source material.. they even have David Hsyter back and he’s sharp as ever.. might be a lot of stuff on the cutting room floor that David could bring to life. I’m hoping that they deliver the goods.. they need a win on this

[@AlexAdrift]

Yeah, they need a win. Badly.

[@djgeneticdisorder]

Why does it have to be MGS3 all the time, MGS3 is good but not that good, i hope they will do MGS1 1 on 1 remake

[@KIArtis11]

They got Snake looking like John Rambo 😂😂😂

[@AlexAdrift]

"Volgin drew first blood!"

[@Jose-se9pu]

It looks fanmade, and people already noticed they used Phantom Pain animations for Snake in this teaser, the fact they already confirmed they are using the 20 years old audio files for the dialogues, and the lazy and poor state of the Master Collection...btw, over a year without a single news for SH2R, seriously, people trust Konami at this point?

[@janambro8919]

If they are so crazy to do a final fantasy 7 move where you buy fragmets of the story year by year it will be a nice shot to the foot. I don't think many hardcore fans would dig that or even new-comers, i hope their sales and marketing department did their research. Of the new collection i'm in the middle i get the disappointment, but IMO better have it on Steam than any other place at least you know it's there to stay forever if you buy it.

[@AlexAdrift]

Hopefully they give it the Resident Evil treatment and make good remakes every couple years.

[@DMoney-on4fz]

For year's I've loved the MGS series. I bought the MGS Collection on PS3 and downloaded MGS 1 off the PS Network (it was called that back than). A few years back I even got MGS 1 off of GOG. Even when I was a kid I rented Twin Snakes for the GameCube. I just hope that Konami won't mess up this time, but it wouldn't surprise me if they f#ck up somehow. The collection's they've released over the year's are great. Just there's more of an impact with the MGS series. I for one loved the heck out of MGS 4 that I would play it so many time's. It was so fun with what you could do. I do hope that they will re-release MGS 4 in Volume 2. Don't know how they'll pull that off. But now that I am aware of buying them separately on Steam and others I just might buy MGS 3 and not bother with the second one. I don't know in the end. I do own them both and PW on my Xbox. Just having it on my Steam account or PS would be more convenient. I think they don't want to do anything that Kojima made like the Fox Engine. You have your own in house engine and would rather use UE5. Why? MGS V still looks amazing. I do hope that they'll amaze us with MGS Delta

[@Mankey619]

Even I don’t know how they gonna pull it off in their Vol.2 collection for MGS. In my mind I guess they’ll put MGS: Ground Zeros and Phantom Pain. As for MGS4, I don’t think weather they’ll put it in the collection, and instead put Peace Walker and Portable Ops instead. It’ll be more cool if they put Ghost Babble and both MGS Acid games. I guess we just have to wait and see.

[@metalsatan666]

@@Mankey619 it's not worth it if they don't put in MGS4 then, that's the only game people care about to replay because it hasn't been ported at all and is PS3 locked. As for the other games well, I'd prefer TTS, Portable Ops, Peace Walker and the AC!D games more so than MGSV, Ghost Babel would be nice too.

[@casavilla458]

I know that the unreal engine five makes modern games affordable to make because of the graphics and what you can do with that so in that sense I understand that it’s just that the fox engine really was one of the greatest game engines ever made the smoothness of everything Especially in an open world like tpp the animations in the video look like the fox engine I’m hoping Konami is lying in a way in the sense that there using both engines unreal. Five and a fox engine combined the way that death stranding had to combine the engines in it.

[@DarkDyllon]

honestly, the retirement of the FOX engine is a good thing, it might look "good" but it has so many issues, like the slope engine is absolute dogshit. making it in UE5 seems like a logical choice. although, i remain skeptical, it looks gorgeous, i'm not insanely fond of how Snake looked in that close up, but it makes sense when it comes down to it since the jungle is an harsh place. but it looks too perfect too me, where is it gonna fail, what is going to get cut, what are the flaws, is it this perfect because they hand picked everything but the other area's aren't going to anywhere near this perfect? hey, surprise me, show me that i shouldn't doubt Konami, but the sound issues in MGS1 and 2 "master" collection (atleast mgs2's sound issues on playstation) and just in general the sound issues in mgs1 are unacceptable. (also the analog for mgs1 "master" collection simulates the d-pad with 8 way analog control) they got lazy with that and that was a straight up port of the PS1 classic and the HD collection, which they still somehow managed to screw up.

[@AlexAdrift]

They are hiding the warts so far. Hopefully the game doesn't struggle with performance, bugs, and poorly updated mechanics, such as the bosses not playing correct. Never know, maybe it will be as good as advertised. And yeah, the collection has a lot of issues. Really hope there are some fixes incoming. If not, I wouldn't buy Vol 2.

[@thetalltitan2235]

Yeah, my biggest concerns are, aside from the fact that they sabotaged Kojima back then - who has rightfully since departed the company after The Phantom Pain, they might just effect the one thing about the original I feel doesn't need to be touched; the bosses! I mean it can try all it wants to blow my mind (since it does look visually stunning I'll admit), but considering the series isn't the same without its creator Kojima by its side (lookin' at you, Metal Gear Survive!), and that certain elements like the boss battles might get unnecessary changes in which they're fine the way they are (say for the OG's second boss The Pain), I keeping my expectations low and I'm thus not really counting on it...

[@AlexAdrift]

If they mess up the bosses, this game will be a 1/10 regardless of graphical fidelity. Not having kojima or the talented team members will no doubt sour the experience, but, I'm going to try to judge the game fairly. I would like to give the team working on it a chance without judging them because of Konami's faults.

[@GrayFox93]

Konami doesn't fail to disappoint. That's all you need to know. Also, MGS without Kojima isn't MGS

[@AlexAdrift]

Preach 🙏

[@zepstreamer]

I'm hopeful, but I'm not going to be disappointed when its bad.

[@xx3uddhaxx]

New sub here as well as a Kojima fan boy. I can confidently say I do Not trust Konami… let’s hope for the best.

[@SnakeEater871]

I'm just curious as to why they chose to go with remaking this one instead of starting with Metal Gear Solid 1. It's the same question I had when they remade Silent Hill 2 rather than starting with Silent Hill 1.

[@AlexAdrift]

I think its easier. MGS1 would need to use Twin Snakes as more of a reference, because I doubt the remake would use the top down camera. Personally, they might also need to change the level designs because the first person shooting makes twin snakes incredibly easy, seeing as how the levels of 1 were made from a top-down perspective. MGS3 is a safter choice and closer to modern games.

[@alexmear5096]

I think like with silent hill 2 it makes more sense to remake the game in the series that’s the most popular, as much as I wish to see a remake of silent hill 1 it wouldn’t make as much money then a remake of silent hill 2 which is regarded as the very best of the silent hill franchise, same with mgs3 which is considered by many metal gear fans as the magnum opus of metal gear solid, so remaking mgs3 is the more profitable, at least that’s what I think

[@AlexAdrift]

@@alexmear5096 That could easily be the case and a great point. Truth is, we will never know. But, I would assume if Delta is a success, MGS1 won't be far behind.

[@notyilli_2481]

Why isn't the Fox Engine used for MGSD? The Fox Engine is a 10 year old technology, that only a tiny fraction of video game developers have any experience with, and those with experience have long left Konami. Unreal on the other hand is using the latest technologies (being released in 2020, and continuing to receive updates), while retaining what is practically an industry standard workflow. Everybody knows it, and if they don't know it, thorough learning material is at the ready. It is a genuine no brainer to jump to Unreal Engine 5, especially if you're Konami who have previously let go a lot of their game development teams.

[@AlexAdrift]

To me, letting fox engine go to waste and discarding your dev teams doesn't give me confidence. Now they are forced to use Unreal because they wasted their own in-house engine. However, with this being said, perhaps it's a blessing in disguise. Unreal, as you've mentioned, is a great system everyone seems to know and love. Plus, game looks great so far.

[@TheamazingBrad69]

after what they did to the man that MADE konami makes me agree whole heartedly.

[@thiagovidal6137]

Using Fox Engine would make no sense. Obviously very little development was done in the engine in the past 8 years. It doesn't support any of the current gen modern features. I think jumping to a new current engine makes more sense. Besides, since Konami hasn't been actively developing games, there might be a very small group of individuals that even knows how to develop on that engine. It's much easier to put a team together to work on Unreal.

[@AlexAdrift]

I just think its weird to let a in-house engine go to waste, then use Unreal Engine, knowing it will hurt your profits in some manner. Konami has made some questionable choices in recent years. Hope they can turn it around though.

[@thiagovidal6137]

@@AlexAdrift I'm not a business person, but at this point it's probably not worth the development investment on their engine as well as training people to work with it... Even CD Projekt RED, who is extremely competent on their in house engine is developing Witcher 4 on Unreal 5. Probably is more cost efficient than keeping updating their own engine even though Cyberpunk fully ray traced looks better than anything that had come out on U5 so far.

[@AlexAdrift]

@@thiagovidal6137 Good points. I will say, Delta looks great on Unreal.

[@chaz9808]

Never trust Konami words to live by

[@AlexAdrift]

Yeah, they've fooled me one too many times.

[@zonesproductions]

Huh, I wondered why the Delta trailer looked like a fan recreation. It was the Unreal Engine. Yeah, I don't trust Konami, either.

[@AdoreYouInAshXI]

People need to try and have a little positivity. Just trashing the remake because the game is owned by Konami (which is basically what a lot of people are doing) is going to get us no where. Not only that, it's going to kill any hope of Metal Gear remaining relevant in gaming. Konami will never sell the rights to the game, and unless this new remake sells well and people seem to still have an interest in the series, we may as well accept that Metal Gear is absolutely dead forever - no more remakes and definitely no continuation of the series. So maybe encouragement is the better approach instead of admonishment. I mean, the game looks fantastic so far. Why are we crying about UE5 and this fantastic look so far? Just because it's not the outdated Fox Engine? It's like people are just looking for reasons to complain.

[@AlexAdrift]

While I do admit I sound like a whiny troll, I do believe there are justifiable reasons for my actions and opinions. I just don't think Konami has made good decisions for years, neglecting the fox engine included. I do not believe sucking up to Konami like a good little fanboy will ever save the franchise, but to be fair, outrage and negative publicity hasn't produced anything positive either. In my opinion, this is Konami's last chance to save their hardcore franchises, such as Metal Gear and Silent Hills. Despite how great the game looks, I will remain a skeptic until Konami proves otherwise. I will happily admit I am wrong, eat crow, and create videos praising the game if It turns out as good as it looks.

[@AdoreYouInAshXI]

@@AlexAdrift No one said you should suck up to Konami like a fanboy. Let's not throw around strawmans like there is no middle ground. I don't disagree that Konami has made bad decisions (I don't know if I'd really say neglecting the fox engine is one of them, seeing as how they haven't put out any game that would utilize it other than Metal Gear Survive - which ran on the Fox engine). And I'm not saying you're wrong to be skeptical. But I'd at least hold off on making videos like this until there is a reason to be skeptical about this particular game other than the fact that it's IP is owned by Konami. If Konami really is trying to turn over a new leaf and make up for those bad decisions (which definitely isn't impossible, look at Capcom) then they'd probably be incentivized more by encouragement than automated negativity, even if people are right to be skeptical. All I know is I want Metal Gear to continue, and it's already going to be a difficult task for that to happen since it's been so long since the series was relevant. Many younger gamers have probably never even played a MG game. Like you said, this is the last chance for Konami to stay relevant in the console market that they've pretty much moved on from. Thing is, they don't really NEED to remain relevant in the console gaming market. They're making a ton of money in other ways. It would be super easy for them to just pull the plug altogether if this game (and their other reboots like Silent Hill) does poorly. So while I'm not saying to just blindly buy it regardless of the quality, let's at least give it some support while it's in development (and looks great, imo, so far). And I'm not picking on your single video btw, because there are quite a few videos like this one that have already been released. Complaining about the silliest things (one video was basically trying to get people not to buy the game simply because they're updating the combat to include more fluid gameplay).

[@AlexAdrift]

I just think destroying your in-house engine, destroying your dev teams, and mismanaging your hardcore franchises are mistakes that warrant some skepticism. I like the move to unreal, but lets not pretend its not a solution to a problem Konami made themselves. They neglected Fox for years and sacked most of their devs that knew how to use it. I understand your points as well. I think giving them the benefit of the doubt or imparting some good will is most likely the right choice. The sad truth is, the team working on the game seems good. But, unfortunately for them, they have Konami as their overlords. You should always give second chances, especially when it comes to art. However...I will not bite my tongue out of fear. Fear that they will somehow or someway sack the franchise...AGAIN. They already destroyed Metal Gear once, they will happily do it again if it doesn't make them money. If Konami has shown us one thing, is that they don't care about bad press, good press, or fan loyalty. They care about money above all else. A dipshit on youtube, ME, isn't going to make or break the game. If you are worried about the franchise leaving, pray its good and buy 42 copies. I will suggest EVERYONE buy it, play it, then give your honest feedback. Despite my warranted skepticism, I will of course be buying the game and giving an honest outlook. You don't have to agree with my thoughts, but just know it doesn't come from a place of clickbaits or rage. I will be just as vocal if the game is a success, which, if you judge the limited gameplay, it just might be.

[@Mighty10917]

Well not entirely but I did liked their recent game Super Bomberman R2 (Lack of advertisement btw which shows their laziness considering that the first game sold millions and that the second game is vastly better) Suikoden 1&2 HD Remaster were delayed for quility (I think) so I'm not entirely trusting on Konami

[@KuroNoTenno]

MGS Delta isn't developed in FOX Engine, because Konami, as far as I remember, said that they got rid of it.

[@mycardboardbox]

probably because the fox engines outdated, and konami cba developing it further,

[@AlexAdrift]

Yeah, its outdated. Just find it weird they left it to waste away. Maybe in the future they will dust it off.

[@bigboss1fan]

I don’t think it is a coincidence that konami has released this footage when they realized that people noticed them being lazy. If they aren’t willing to give the originals the respect they deserve then I doubt they are putting much effort in the remake after all they don’t have to do much since the story is already written for them and it is telling when konami says these games have “outdated ideas”. Personally I find the graphics a bit generic that doesn’t have to be a bad thing but I just find it noticeable when the other games did what they could to push their respective consoles to their limit but that’s just my opinion. Good video overall 😊

[@MackDaddyVic]

I trust what I’m seeing. This in-engine footage pretty much showcases all I need to know. It’s phenomenal. Everything will be okay.

[@AlexAdrift]

Konami gave me gaming PTSD and it is sometimes hard to shake...

[@stargateheaven23]

The thing is... You are assuming "konami" comes all under 1 thing. The dev teams for this are different than the ones for master collection. It was even different devs for mgs1 compared to the other games. "its konami" argument does not fly.

[@AlexAdrift]

Management however still has an influence on how the game is made and has total creative control over its properties. So to be more specific, I don't trust Konami's decision makers.

[@bilalrashad6636]

After that awful Metal Gear Survive, I definitely don't trust Konami

[@Blballerboy]

How would you feel if the game was a 1 for 1 remake even environment and combat wise? I would disappointed since it’s rooted in the ps2 era but I could understand Konami being nervous to make any changes

[@Trey-jl9ru]

I think i would like to see them use a re4 style approach, change things enough to feel like a whole new game, but the core of the story MUST remain the same. Although in the heat of the game you really don't even notice

[@HeadShoht]

the game looks.. exactly as it should. the bare minimum. it sucks that kojima wont be there to go above and beyond and give us something truly insane.

[@AlexAdrift]

I think they are smart enough to know that only Kojima should make changes to the source material. I will always wonder what could have been had he and the team never been canned.

[@jasp2003]

Did I miss a MGS2 remake?

[@thegrapevine10]

Without Hideo Kojima i doubt the game will be great, probably fair at best.

[@pitonto16]

isn't the Fox Engine owned by Kojima Productions? I'm not sure, that might explain a lot.

[@AlexAdrift]

Kojima ran it, Konami owned it and paid the bills for upgrades. When Kojima and dev teams were canned, the engine was cast aside. In 2020 Konami announced the engine was dead. I don't mind a switch to Unreal, I just think throwing away dev teams, employees, and your in-house engine are bad decisions.

[@dannejoon]

Because Konami scrapped Foxengine after MGSV and a PES title.

[@sean8102]

Honestly why anyone would give Konami the benefit of the doubt is beyond me. When it comes to Delta, yeah of course it looks pretty, and publishers know graphics can sell A LOT of copies. Overall I take the same approach I do for basically any game. Expect the worst, hope for the best, and hopefully end up pleasantly surprised. So cautiously, very cautiously optimistic. Hope they pull it off. As for the use of UE 5. I honestly thought that was announced long ago. As soon as the trailer started basically I was like "yep that's Unreal Engine". IDK why but with a lot of games you can just tell by the look it's UE. But I'm fine with whatever engine it is as long as it's fun. But this is the same company that looked at the Silent Hill HD Collection and thought "yep that's fit for sale". PS3 version got one update that seems to have done nothing, and 360 version didn't get a single update. Then you have the Master Collection Vol 1. Goodness. MGS 1 is literally just a ISO and a PSX emulator which you can't adjust any settings on (resolution, toggle dif modes of texture filtering or scaling etc). MGS 2 and 3 are literally just the 360 versions of Bluepoint's HD collection. Probably why even on PC MGS 2 and 3 are res locked at 720p! Of course within hours modders removed that limitation. The audio for MGS 2 and 3 are so scuffed there are mods on the nexus to replace all of the audio in each game. How? By just copy pasting the files from the 360 HD collection. It's really sad. These games are iconic, and deserve much better for their "Master Collection". For many this will be the first way they play these games.

[@AlexAdrift]

The master collection is awful and disappointing to most. I feel for the people that purchased it looking to experience MGS again or for the first time. Konami has a chance at redemption, a chance to restart its major franchises, such as MG and Silent Hill. Hopefully they don't drop the ball.

[@Mankey619]

Konami will always going to find their way to get our approval, by baiting us with nostalgia. I mean their not the most honest company in the world, and always going to screw us in the end. As much I want to believe in this remake. I too share my doubts in trusting a company that screwed Hideo Kojima over. The guy who created this franchise for them.

[@ricardassteckas6620]

Save fox engine for metal gear survive 2 lol 😁😁😁

[@AlexAdrift]

God No...Lol

[@TheFlatEarthChannelcom]

Unreal engine 5 is far superior. It has nanite which means unlimited polygons. It has lumens which mean ray tracing like lighting all real time. No more baked in light maps. It has real time like bouncing and full real time reflections. What is there not to like in unreal engine 5

[@AlexAdrift]

Oh I like unreal. For my own projects, I use unreal. But I didn't have an in-house engine I neglected after destroying most of my in-house dev teams. I don't blame them for "upgrading" their engine, but lets not forget how they handled their previous engine, employees, and licenses.

[@TheFlatEarthChannelcom]

@@AlexAdrift I think they should remake metal gear solid 5 with unreal engine and finish the game this time.

[@AlexAdrift]

@@TheFlatEarthChannelcom Yeah, would be cool. I think despite the drama and the insane work conditions, MGS5 still offers better gameplay then a lot of AAA games today. I'll always wonder what could have been though.

[@jamesverhoeven8769]

It’s actually better they use unreal 5 that’s legit the future but I get what u mean and I too am skeptical

[@ververdil8296]

Nope I never trust Konami Im not fun of recycled game

[@chacachaca11]

"Do you trust Konami?" Fuck no lol. The existence of Metal Gear survive murdered ANY hopes of me looking forward to anything metal gear from them. the fact they released the laziest collection of the games is just making it worse.

[@liquidcnake]

I don't know about Unreal Engine... but if a third party company developed the game and not Konami. I'm good with that.

[@AlexAdrift]

True, never know, this third party dev might turn into the next Bluepoint. Look what Bluepoint did with Demon Souls. Konami staying away might be for the best.

[@liquidcnake]

@@AlexAdrift totally agreed, but I've seen some proof that the third party dev is Virtuos Studios.

[@AlexAdrift]

@@liquidcnake I don't know what they've done. They any good?

[@liquidcnake]

@@AlexAdrift apparently they helped developed the game Horizon Zero Dawn and they also popular in the PS2 Era.

[@liquidcnake]

They also helped on developing Dark Souls Remastered, Call of Duty Warzone and Final Fantasy XII

[@Starcat128]

Even if it does look like a really good graphical game, they’re going to be lazy and make us download it and not put it all on the disc or cartridge they did the metal gear solid collection. They didn’t put crap on the cartridge. if I was, I would take the game back and get your money back and not download it

[@AlexAdrift]

Yeah, agreed. I didn't buy the collection. Glad I didn't, which is sad, because I love Metal Gear. Hope they have some fixes before Vol 2.

[@Alizzgreat]

Funny video 😄👍🏽

[@gregstar2091]

Nobody cares Adrift.