Meural Digital Picture Frame Review

[@shadow7037932]

Almost $700.... that's MORE expensive than a lot of good 27" 1440p IPS monitors or hell even some lenses. Hard skip for me on this one. I'd consider it at $300ish, no way would I buy this for $700.

[@RichFreeman]

Yikes. I'm thinking about using a monitor and a Chromecast as an improvised photo frame. I just can't stand that every frame I've seen is so low resolution. Many aren't even 1080p. Right now I'm using an old Nexus 10 as a photo frame. 10" and 300dpi. Sure, it isn't ideal and the bezel is large by today's standards, but good luck finding something better for sale at almost any price. You'd think with all the tablets out there that 10-20" 200-300dpi displays would not be so hard to find in a dedicated frame.

[@Dav3523]

I've seen one of these in real life, and I was fooled into thinking it was a print, until out of the corner of my eye, I noticed the image changed. If you want a monitor, with a bezel (rather than frame), and the buttons and logos, go for the monitor.

[@randysem]

I haven't seen one IRL and I agree that the price is quite an investment. However I think the experience for something like this is also important. If it displays beautiful pieces of art or cherished fotographs in a manner that lets one forget it is actually digital. And it can hung up there for decade. Perhaps it could be worth the money then. It is quite lonely in its segment. I do have doubts about most tvs/monitors offering that photo experience. Unfortunately I don't see a device like this going on sale very often.

[@ceebee7192]

I've Framed photos for upwards of $700, this time I'm going to try the digital route.

[@braindeadbonobo]

Didn't know displaying static images required a quad core CPU and 2 gigs of RAM. It also draws 20 watts on average.

[@riotrob]

Can it be color corrected? Are you loading your photos on their website? Do they claim they can now share the photos with their partner companies?

[@JamesBrown-jp9kp]

I'm a joiner by trade and making a wooden frame to go around a monitor will only take around an hour or 2 to do so. Doing large numbers would take even less time. So should be the smallest cost involved really. it's also technology that's 10 years old or something now. Production costs should be cheaper. Apart from that. It looks great. And blends it way better that the other minister looking ones you mentioned. Love your videos anyway. Keep up the good work!

[@Hero1117a]

$700 No Way

[@MustafaKamal-nh7iw]

Hero1117 in Australia it's $1200 plus $80 per year

[@butchjohnson9736]

I just knew we were going to see that sun setting picture Tony is so proud about.

[@UdayMaripalli]

How is the color accuracy of this screen? Can you color calibrate this screen to make sure colors show correctly? I think these are they types of things we look for in reviews by you guys. Your videos are becoming more and more "features oriented" than real reviews. I love all your old videos.

[@veemacks7255]

The $700 price no matter what you'd said earlier would be a shocker, but when it was preceded by 4 or 5 significant negative points that already make you think it's not something you'd want, well that just puts the nail in the coffin. Paying that price for something awesome (whatever it might be) is not a problem, but paying it for something you'd rate at $50 based on its shortcomings ... that ain't gonna happen.

[@shifteleven]

The best picture display I've used is my Google Home Hub. The screen changes brightness automatically and adjusts it's white balance to match the room. It looks like a paper print. It's wild. Have you used that device to compare to this frame? Does it do the white balance adjustments? Also, how does it look at night? Does it go dark to not be distracting? I know a lot of people are going to complain about the price, but I can get why it would cost that much and why it's not just a simple monitor - lots of little things have to go into making it seemless in a room that is a niche product. Thanks for putting this on the radar

[@0ooTheMAXXoo0]

1 android compatible motherboard with USB port. 1 screen. 1 wooden frame around it. Maybe $30 for those parts. They probably do not even have to write any software to show the pictures as that stuff already exists. The parts needed to make it work are tiny and so fit easily into such a thick frame. You could put it together in one afternoon, no specially designed parts needed apart from some cuts into the wooden frame.

[@shifteleven]

@@0ooTheMAXXoo0 I get what you're saying - but I think that misses the finer points of what this particular picture frame does. What I'm hearing is that this doesn't look like a computer screen tied up to your wall - it looks matte and like canvas. That's the funky part that makes it special. And that's the premium you get taxed if you want this device.

[@venom5809]

Yep, love my Google Home Hub, sits on my desk and cycles through my photos, best purchase ever.

[@Hangs4Fun]

@@0ooTheMAXXoo0 build it and make a video showing how you did it. I think you will find it's more challenging than you think. I've had the same idea (first time was to use a raspberry pie). And then getting a way to get photos to it that any one can do and then customizing the viewing after they are up would be the next challenges.

[@RichFreeman]

@@0ooTheMAXXoo0 my only digital frame right now is a Nexus 10 hanging on the wall. If I do another one I'm guessing I'd use a monitor and Chromecast.

[@giorassiccuriosity1796]

I am baffled with all advancements we’ve made- yet still have a really advanced and affordable digital wall frame- that has usb/ usb-c type power. I’ve been on a look out for years and seems will be still be on a lookout for a little longer.

[@dumpmuch]

Does it light up if it’s dark? I want something like this in my bedroom

[@derekdubs3074]

I love how this looks. It will go great in my living room five years from now when the price comes down

[@t.s8113]

Agree, that's a little steeper than I am willing to spend. Is there anything out there that uses battery/cordless? I would pay more for a cordless digital frame. Thanks for your video. Informative.

[@InTheMomentTravels]

How exactly can you load photos from your PC? I've not found that feature, and working from the cell is tedious at best. Plus, I cannot find how to delete an image. With all that said...We love it, as we are full-time rvers, and traveling hobbyist photographers with little wall space and tons of cool travel shots. We looked at the price as if we'd printed just 5 metal prints, and we'd be well over the purchase price. It has to be taken down each time we move, so we designed a french cleat for it. 4K would be awesome - totally agree. Judy @ In The Moment Travels

[@Mason_Walsh]

That looks awesome! But, there's has to be a cheaper option that's not total garbage. Any recommendations below $200?

[@guyjordan8201]

Not ready for prime time... but it's getting closer. Tx. But seriously Tone, pop a couple small holes in the wall and thread the wire through; these kinds of things take commitment! ;)

[@southerncharity7928]

You can literally just mount a decent TV to the wall then build a frame around it ( or just forget the frame). Many TVs have a photo display mode also ... Just slot in a USB stick. ( No Arduino required) This product is pointless.

[@0ooTheMAXXoo0]

If it was way cheaper like $80, then it would make some sense.

[@shifteleven]

But those TVs don't look matte and blend in the room. That's the premium. I mean, if the TV is good enough for you, then no worries. I see this more like it's competing with a printer and paper. It will cost me less to buy a printer and print out a bunch of photos. Then I would just have to remember to rotate the photos - just not every 3 minutes ;)

[@mattmitchell6157]

... like the Samsung frame tv did.

[@shifteleven]

@@mattmitchell6157 I didn't know about that TV. Thanks! More than $700, but hey - it's also a TV so win.

[@mattmitchell6157]

K. Adam Christensen it’s specs are getting a little behind, but I’m sure it’s due for a revamp. It’s the best option I’ve ever seen.

[@tjnak]

How many metal prints can I get for $700?

[@jbslade82]

Meural is not just a "digital picture frame." It is really designed to display actual art. The art is curated and sourced from museums around the world. That is not something you could build even if you wanted to. This review misses the entire point of Meural. Displaying photos is just something it can do "also."

[@UkeGoesRawrGazzawr]

but then why can't you just find photos of art sourced from museums around the world and put them in there? sure if you're into very high end art that is exclusive to those museums AND meural then sure, $700 for whoever enjoys fine art at that price point. but if its not art that is exclusive then whats the point?

[@DonaldBillings]

I just picked up the first model. They're down to ~$400. Version two is a couple of hundred more.

[@NewYears1978]

$400 still about $300 too much

[@gabriel84]

or... you can print a photo and hang it on a frame. believe me, it's possible!

[@maxfactor4209]

impossible.

[@RichFreeman]

I get that a lot of photographers like to print, and I can sort of see why, but it seems like a ton of waste. I only have so much wall in my house and with a digital frame I can just manage an online album vs constantly tossing or storing old prints.

[@TheGoodContent37]

And the print photo can play video, cinemagraphs and change the picture at any moment grandpa?

[@GreyFang9]

Not at all to my tastes but it is one of the best looking digi-frames I have yet seen. Under the right lighting, the only give away (if you don't see the image change) is the aspect ratio.

[@thisistimmy]

I would honestly really like to have one, but... I can't justify it right now. Hopefully, down the line they release a 3:2 or 4:3 aspect ratio one. I have a Google Home Hub and it's honestly really great. It has a lowish resolution, but like Tony said, it doesn't bother me at all. Add in that it can adjust to the colour temp of the light to make it seem more like a print and it's fantastic for what it costs (especially if you can get it on sale for $100).

[@munkykng416]

I use my living room tv with Chromecast and set it to display "friends and family" from my Google photos, it works really well with a few misfires, but I like it

[@WilliamJohnston]

I wish there was a bigger market for this. Until there’s more competition and more supply and demand, I don’t know if these will ever become high enough resolution at the price people would be willing to pay for it!

[@henryD9363]

Checked out Amazon and still don't know: where are the photos stored? Are they inside the frame, do you have to have a PC connected by wifi, can you adjust the slideshow speed.... I don't know anything about how you set it up, operate it, change the photos, adjust the brightness...

[@jojoaausone]

The photos are stored on Meural's website. You upload your pics. Additionally, you can stick in a thumb drive, but it isn't necessary. For a yearly subscription, you can also access Meural's library of thousands of pieces of the art of many periods, artists and genres. This is an important feature that Tony didn't mention. You can organize your library into playlists, set the time interval for cycling through a playlist, etc. It has an ambient light sensor and can be set to go to sleep automatically in a dark room. Yes it's very pricey, and I'd prefer a 2x3 aspect ratio, but you don't need to crop to 16X9, since the frame will add white borders around other ratios. The only adjustment possible on their site is cropping. My Meural reads a bit too yellow, to my eye. I counteract this by tweaking the yellows in Lr before uploading. Overall, I'm glad I bought it.

[@henryD9363]

@@jojoaausone Thanks. Can you set the slideshow speed and does it adjust the brightness based on the room brightness? I'm thinking if it was always glowing bright in the middle of the night it would be annoying. I have lots of photos I took hiking in mountains and this is appealing to me, although still too expensive

[@jojoaausone]

@@henryD9363 Yes, you can set the slideshow speed in the Canvas settings (each Meural you own is called a "canvas" and has a name). It has pretty good control features, although as Tony demonstrated, the swiping on the canvas is a bit hit or miss. But, you can swipe perfectly on their phone app. Here is some relevant info from the Meural website. Check out their site for a lot more specifics. Honest, they're not paying me! 😄 "The ambient light sensor measures the light in the room and adjusts the Canvas screen accordingly. The light sensor options can be adjusted on my.meural.com. To access these, click on the image of your Canvas in the lower lefthand corner of the screen and then click Settings in the upper lefthand corner. Scroll down to Light Sensitivity, which can be adjusted to Low, Normal, or High. To use the Scheduler, go to my.meural.com and click on the user icon in the upper right hand corner of the screen. Next, click on Canvases. In the upper right hand corner of the next screen, click on Scheduler. With the Scheduler, you can put the Canvas to sleep and wake it up at certain times of day. To do this, press the purple plus sign and enter in the time you want the Canvas to be on or off, select the day or days you want this to happen in the drop down menu, and below this select the action you want to perform. Once you hit save, you will see a banner at the bottom of the screen stating that the Scheduler has been updated. To delete an action, click on the circular arrow next to the action, and then click on the garbage can. The Scheduler can also be used to schedule playlists at certain times. Follow the steps above, click on the Playlist action and select from your playlists. Remember to click on the Save button to make your changes permanent. "

[@L-Bj]

John H, yes and yes plus one can also manual scroll through the images and manual set the brightness. At least Android version 4.10.0 has scheduler build into it, so you can set it up from your mobile. For expanding storage it has a microSD card slot to be precise, not a typical 'thumb drive'. Furthermore there's 4gb storage available, images uploaded in the cloud. Or just use your mobile internal storage. A lot of options all in all.

[@HoustonBrownPhotography]

These things have been too expensive since their conception and still remain so. Maybe one day they will be more affordable.

[@karrieglasgow1528]

Can you tell me the width of your wall? The proportions look good.

[@eiricnorstrom-johnsen9662]

For $700 you can just buy a printer instead.

[@ragnar6326]

The camera recommendation section is at least two years old under the video. Would you guys update it, please? I'm right before gear purchase...

[@MrStevegibb]

Not that bad tbh considering what some people pay for paintings and i think it looks really nice.

[@mannykaras7278]

Hi thanks for the review can you plug a USB stick in with all your photos thanks

[@Celestialrob]

Nice post C&T. I very nearly bought one from a store in Marin a few months ago. It truly is a beautiful frame and presentation of images, but the price was a killer. At $499 I'd have bought one or even two. I took a different approach which is to buy a whole series of 24x30 and 16x24 metal prints. Have you ever done anything on printing on metal versus other forms?

[@50man1]

Hey Tony, I've been trying to find a digital frame that is large enough to display our photos. What do you think about having this in a living room? How does it do if the lights go off? I see the have a Canvas 2 but can't find much about it. Hey Thanks for the great videos.

[@adriataylor7534]

that is pretty cool. i had the thought it would be a great item to have to display your photography....until the $700 price. that is expensive, but i can see why it would be that, the quality work that goes into a frame like that and plus the digital photos.

[@Ravencroft81]

My grandma'd take 1 look at the moving picture and run out screaming: "Your house is haunted! The will of the Lord compels you!"

[@maxfactor4209]

hahah, I can make one with raspberry pi and a matte LED panel for under 170 USD and it is not hard Tony (at least for a computer guy like you and I ). You need a frame (10 USD) + let say 17" full HD LED panel (120 USD) + LED TTL controller (15 USD) and Raspberry pi (40). it can be a fun half day weekend project.

[@seanbirtwistle649]

people getting sticker shock never printed and framed their work before... a bit of perspex and a good border can run between $2k -$3k for an A2 sized print if you want it nice

[@vinozorolla7504]

KZbin knows how to pick perfect thumbnails!

[@keeblerhunts]

I think the digital photo frame market has to be careful with price. We use our TV connected to an AppleTV as our digital photo frame. There are so many other types of multi-media devices out there which make it incredibly easy to do. So I think pricing themselves higher will only cut out a larger segment of the population who would rather put that $$ towards a fully functional TV. There will be folks out there willing and able to put the $ out for one of these frames, but I would guess not as many. The ratio is definitely different. I would much rather have something more in line with traditional photography because it simply makes it easier to export out of whichever editing program and that file can have many uses instead of having an export specifically for this frame.

[@LeoSavantt]

If you display a 3:2 image with the frame in horizontal positioning or 2:3 in portrait positioning does the user have a choice whether to crop the image or show the whole image, albeit with letter-boxing (i.e. borders)? To be concise can you force the unit to show an entire standard Full Frame or ASPC image? Would greatly appreciate an answer to this as being forced to crop or having the device crop my images would be a deal breaker. Many thanks.

[@Falcrist]

What a crazy product... For that price you could get a picture frame, print out years worth of pictures, and just swap them out every few days. By the time you spent $700, the digital frame would probably need to be replaced anyway.

[@actionphotopassion5082]

Adding to the fact by the time the 700usd of the screen have became 250usd, the 700usd prints could have changed in 2100usd.... Art vs overspread technology :)

[@vietiscool]

printing and swapping them out every few days takes a lot of work

[@ecmjr]

Hi Tony, what camera are you holding when doing this video?

[@eyewaves...]

Thank you for telling about your experience...though I see a mega future for this kind of frame...

[@Mamo878]

Hahaha It's funny how camera people spend thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars on gear like multiple bodies, many lenses, adapters, filters, tripods, lighting etc. but when it comes to spending money on actually comfortably _viewing_ their photos they don't want to really spend any money at all.

[@peterjacoby3399]

Or they say they’ll print them but printing and framing 3 or 4 prints costs more than this $700 frame that will display hundreds of pictures.

[@masterblimpy]

That looks so awesome. I actually like it. Can display art and pictures. Pick maybe. Different theme every month so visitors and guests will be entertained. Nice. $600 is pricey.

[@garyheurich6835]

Couldn't find it, but have you done a piece on cinemagraphs? (Also, agreed re res too low, price too high, aspect too unappealing.)

[@zfisher]

That's a great photo of Chelsea in Peru

[@RobCollins2015]

I think 'The Frame' by Samsung is a much better buy. For less than US$1,000 you get a 43" 4k TV with 43" 4k photo frame mode (for when it is not switched on as a TV). The photo frame mode is very convincing....

[@adr007]

Do you have a tutorial on how did you make the slight moving photos for the frame?

[@TimberGeek]

Actually the custom framing is the easy part from where I sit... I did move the table saw into the basement this fall but still have one router table and stack of acclimatized hardwood almost literally at my finger tips. ;-D

[@MoeGravey]

Not a plug( as I just searched for it) but depict makes a 4k 49” for $899. Would be interested in a review.

[@folmonty]

I’m a big fan of digital frames. This one is nice but needs more refinement for the cost IMO

[@StreetGuardianJON]

Is that the light or dark wood frame?

[@picklelicken]

hey how is the software with this to post your own content? is there a pc based version of it or just an app on the phone? What about streaming content to it how easy it to setup a slide show? what about stream content from a remote location like a cloud rather than the 8GB disk?

[@JeffWelcherMedia]

For $700 it's pathetic this thing isn't higher than HD resolution. Surely anyone in the market for this type of product would a)want higher resolution and b)want it to not be such an unusual aspect ratio. If I owned this I'd want every picture personally resized/moved; not worth my time for a product that costs as much as my i7 laptop (which of course I use daily). I converted a refurbished full-HD Amazon Fire tablet into a digital photo frame. Custom frame and powered on the wall. $125 all-in. It's touchscreen and has partial Android functionality for playing videos, music, etc. Thanks as always for posting the great video though!

[@iKeto_gal]

Y’all haven’t reviewed bags in awhile. Hope to see some this year...especially air travel bags 🧳 cases and landscape hiking backpacks 🎒

[@WeldonSirloin]

As someone watching this on my 1080p monitor, I feel attacked.

[@drtechtek2165]

No link in the description? :p

[@pattymattes7124]

I would rather have a print framed. Can always change prints. This may be more lively but for me it's not worth the expense. I would rather use the money to put into a good lens. Thanks for the review.

[@brainguynyc8729]

What is the difference between meural and meural 2?

[@RichardRostant1]

Yep, you lost me at $700. I'll stick with the good old fashioned picture frame.

[@ecollazo67]

The picture of Chelsea looking back as she was walking came from a video they shot on Macchu Picchu that had a camera review I wanted to watch but I can't seem to find the video in their channel. Does anyone know which one it was?

[@TonyAndChelsea]

I think it was the a7R II

[@ecollazo67]

@@TonyAndChelsea I think you're right. Do you have a link to that video?

[@dayvid60van]

That is way way WAY too expensive Jesus you can buy a 50" 4K TV for that money! C'mon Meural time to step into reality

[@malifestro7596]

I actually only shoot 16:9 now. I feel like IT is the standard now and nearly all people are still shooting in the wrong aspect ratio. Nearly everyone is consuming on a phone or computer screen which is likely 16:9 or something else that is wide like that. So 4:3 is not a great aspect ratio for these mediums.

[@thegreatvanziniphotos5976]

Was the noise I heard associated with pic change?

[@richardgraham65]

never mind the aspect ratio or the resolution, the damn thing is $695.00 on Amazon! I could mount a 4K TV on the wall and have a pocket full of change. Crazy prices.

[@morbly]

It sounded like this thing always needs to be connected to a router. It should just require a micro SD card. I'm tired of IoT I want stuff that doesn't also require me to sign up and give the company some kind of personal information.

[@L-Bj]

It connects to your wifi and it has a microSD slot 😒

[@kesayo]

I heard it doesn't have any direct video input via hdmi or other. That's a deal breaker for me especially at that price point. I would rather pay a few hundred bucks more and get the Samsung digital frame/TV combo. If you're on a budget, just get an IPS display, a custom frame kit, and plug in a fire stick. For less than $300 you can have a pretty decent photo frame that you can also watch movies on.

[@cotswoldphotographers]

Wow that really does look fantastic, shame about the cost though 👍

[@MadEnglishTV]

I hate to veer off topic, but I'm upset that the Panasonic S1 is overpriced and has NO FLIPPY SCREEN.

[@ImadogGarcia]

I hate the aspect ratio :(

[@peteristvanphotography]

Thanks for the review

[@viktorbakai]

And what if you want horizontal image on it, black bars appear on top and bottom? Or you rotate the whole thing 90 degree? :D

[@TonyAndChelsea]

Yeah you rotate it 🤷‍♂️

[@NoxNoctisUmbra]

Price is bit steep. But thank you for posting quick video review for things like this.

[@kimsosson4739]

I love the matte finish although the aspect ratio turns me down. What definitely kills it is the price. I mean come on: it seems like a decent product but the price is pretty steep.

[@justdoittom8431]

Make a video showing how to make cinema graphs please.

[@jjk9999]

700? get a huge 4k tv instead. super easy to put in pics via usb and they look astounding.

[@0ooTheMAXXoo0]

Even if you don't want something huge, get a medium-sized 4k HDR TV that is nice and thin and hang it in the wall....

[@Hkmmotologs]

Sigma 70-200 2.8 Sport lens review any time soon?

[@rashiedej]

How much does it weigh?

[@ottawamountainman]

Aspect ratio mostly 2:3 not 3:4.... (for 35 mm camera). Thanks for the video. Cheers.

[@TonyAndChelsea]

Yeah I misspoke

[@ottawamountainman]

Tony & Chelsea Northrup no worries. Thanks for making great content.

[@note5camera]

what does it look like at night in a dark room?

[@slideworks]

That thumbnail tho 😝

[@kalekain3521]

I was just about to comment on this. Chels must have uploaded this one.

[@remydukes1828]

Chelsi is ❤️

[@mediaconsumer9195]

2:27 ;)

[@damaster692]

Lets get the raw from her so we can do our own edit. The best picture gets a free A6400

[@mygad]

I can see these used in a horror movie. The killer/stalker loads up scary pictures as he's terrorizing Jamie Lee Curtis or that girl from Hellraiser. I mean, that mask wearing guy from Halloween and Pinhead both kinda look like IT computer nerd people as well. Totally believable.

[@dragonstone6594]

Reminds me of the digital picture frames Kodak used to sell.

[@pgtips4240]

If I has that amount of money spare it would be going toward a lens! The digital frames will drop in price in the future.

[@0ooTheMAXXoo0]

3:2 is the most common aspect ratio in still cameras. Like 35mm film... 4:3 is Old TV ratio... I have no idea what uses 4:5.

[@ShaneBaker]

Nah. Probably AUD1k if paying with the South Pacific Peso. I'd want better than 1080p and a more friendly aspect ratio for that kind of money. Thanks for the review.

[@Osvaldo_Oz]

it would make more sense to buy the 4k tv "Samsung the frame". it will give you frame functionality and a 4k tv

[@annetted5794]

Great concept. Maybe the price will reduce as the product is refined.

[@KarpisMaksudian]

Tony I got the Meural 27 canvas ii after watching your video, I may say... I am not happy with product specially customer service is total crap, there is no way I can use SD card and there is no instructions, I opened few tickets with customer service but they are not helpful at all, but Netgear/Meural had no problem taking my $600, Pictures may look good but in my opinion its garbage specially when you get ignored by customer service. (by the way thanks for FAA 107 video, I am getting ready for the test)

[@thanehtike]

You guys have great content... I enjoy your videos. Ok Tony, let's see you jam out on your guitar....

[@kjkromm]

Magically mounts itself.

[@KAZUNARl]

that’s a whole lot of money if you keep in mind that it’s just a picture frame and your electricity bill will also get higher... I mean people are maybe just watching the frame for a moment and don’t stare at it like on a TV or something... however, when I’m rich and don’t know how to waste money anymore I may get a cuple of them...

[@ExploreThroughMe]

Nice House Tony and Chelsea.

[@miguellee3]

I'd love to buy the white version of this... It looks really good, but $600?! Yikes!!

[@zguy95135]

It's a cool product but it's so expensive for something with issues as a picture frame (lower res and 16:9, what???). You could buy a refurb ipad and frame that, or a cheap 4k monitor and stick a Chromecast on it and use that as the slide show. If you tie it to Google photos you can upload images remotely too

[@0ooTheMAXXoo0]

You can buy a new iPad and frame and still save money.. A 45" 4k tv costs the same or less and that must have a more powerful computer in there as well. Lots of them have very little frame and are very flat... This picture frame seems like it was not specially designed for the purpose at all (see how thick it is). It seems to have a screen from 2 or 3 generations ago (probably very cheap) and you do not need much computer power to display pictures or HD video... Just crap designed to sell to rich people who do not know any better it seems.

[@BartRos1980]

I mean it looks great. But...I do feel you can build this DIY for less with decent results. As our ubernerd ill be waiting for that video Tony.

[@eviem70]

Jeez o Pete, that’s expensive! Really nice, but I can’t see myself paying $700. I’d rather buy a macro for that price 🤷🏽‍♀️

[@MrSunamo]

Concept-wise it is a good product, but it looks like it needs some more improvements and a lower price point.