I really like such problems with elegant solutions.
@winteringgoose4 жыл бұрын
I wrote out this expression for a coworker yesterday, and to my astonishment, the instant I finish writing, she blurts out, "It's 6!" Shocked, I ask her how. She proceeds to explain: "Because m and n are both 0, so 2 and 2 and 2 has to be 6!" I told her she was right but that wasn't why...we didn't go any further than that, but it was a funny little moment to share.
@toamatau87854 жыл бұрын
Why would you write it out for someone who thinks 2^0 is 2 or more worryingly that 2(2+2)=6
@winteringgoose4 жыл бұрын
@@toamatau8785 Because I don't know what someone will think about a thing before I tell them about it
@JM-us3fr4 жыл бұрын
Dang it, I didn't notice the common denominator things leads to a cancellation. I left the fractions un-combined as (1/2^m+1/2^n) and had to do a lot more work.
@JL-vh8ne4 жыл бұрын
This equation are called "Macintosh Plus".
@goodplacetostop29734 жыл бұрын
12:10 Can’t believe Ajax Amsterdam put 13 goals yesterday. Anyway, daily homework... For notation reasons, let’s introduce surd(x,n) being the n-th real root of x. So, surd(x,2) is the square root of x, surd(x,3) is the cube root of x, and so on. In the development of the binomal (a • surd(a/3,5) - b/surd(a^3,7))^n, determine the terms that contains a to the power of three, if the sum of the binomial coefficients that occupy uneven places in the development of the binomial is equal to 2048.
@alphacharlie19794 жыл бұрын
-264 a^3 b^7
@padraiggluck29803 жыл бұрын
Wow! Thank you for your videos, Prof Penn.
@andcivitarese4 жыл бұрын
let S=sum[m=0 to inft] (m+1)/2^m. Split into sum[m=0 to inft] m/2^m + sum[m=0 to inft] 1/2^m. The second term converges to 2. In the first term let m=k+1 and the sum becomes sum[k=-1 to inft] (k+1)/2^(k+1). Bring a 2 outside the denominator and notice that we can neglect the term for k=-1 which is 0, and so the first term becomes (1/2) sum[k=0 to inft] (k+1)/2^k, i.e. (1/2)S. Putting all toghether we get an equation for S: S=S/2+2 from which S=4
@toamatau87854 жыл бұрын
Was very pleasantly surprised i was able to follow along with this, lol.
@shanmugasundaram96884 жыл бұрын
Separating 'x' outside the summation and writing it as differential of product functions is indeed genius.The double summation converges interestingly to a natural number and that too to a perfect number' 6'.
@VaradMahashabde4 жыл бұрын
I am just sad he didn't use an arithmetico-geometric series
@TheMauror224 жыл бұрын
That's what I call supersymmetry
@shahinjahanlu21994 жыл бұрын
You are great and I enjoy your solution
@skwbusaidi4 жыл бұрын
But wolframalpha gives that 1/2 (m+n+mn)/(2^(m+n)) coverages to 6 which is correct
@zecareca424 жыл бұрын
Extremely elegant
@PlayerMathinson4 жыл бұрын
Can someone please explain me how did covergence lead to him exchanging the terms of the summation and having no effect?
@Milan_Openfeint4 жыл бұрын
If a sum converges, you can reorder the terms. If the sum (result) is infinite, you can't. It's... some rule that everybody knows ;-)
@Dhanush-zj7mf4 жыл бұрын
@@Milan_Openfeint I was wondering why is that rule true....😊
@PlayerMathinson4 жыл бұрын
@@Milan_Openfeint Yes, but any intuition or proof you can give? Thanks.
@PlayerMathinson4 жыл бұрын
@ゴゴ Joji Joestar ゴゴ Thank you for your reply. Never knew of this theorem, will find more about it.
@buxeessingh25714 жыл бұрын
The series converges absolutely, so you can exchange sums.
@BrainsOverGains4 жыл бұрын
Isn't assuming that the series converges too show that the series converges circular reasoning?
@Qsdd04 жыл бұрын
He's assuming the series converges to find it's value. The argument for the convergence is that the exponential beats the polynomial, but that of course isn't quite rigorous.
@TheMauror224 жыл бұрын
Maybe now, with an epsilon-N argument, one could show that the limit of the partial sums is 6.
@buxeessingh25714 жыл бұрын
It is absolutely convergent, so you can exchange the limit operations.
@BrainsOverGains4 жыл бұрын
@@buxeessingh2571 and why does it absolutely converge? 🤔
@skwbusaidi4 жыл бұрын
Wolframalpha can not solve this. It gives that series is diverges
@JivanPal4 жыл бұрын
It seems that WolframAlpha fails to apply the limit test properly to nested series. For example, it even incorrectly states that Σ_m Σ_n [1/(mn)] fails to converge by virtue of the limit test, which is incorrect, as the limit test gives an inconclusive result on that series.
@EebstertheGreat4 жыл бұрын
These videos are great to watch at 2x speed.
@k3dr14 жыл бұрын
Very aesthetic indeed
@jkid11344 жыл бұрын
One blackboard ❤
@JorgeGomez-li9td4 жыл бұрын
Very nice!
@Schaex14 жыл бұрын
This is really beautiful! The only thing I don't really understand is why do you evaluate the sum at x=0.5? Did I miss something or what's the reason behind that?
@easymathematik4 жыл бұрын
Evaluating x^n at x = 0.5 gives you 2^n in the denominator. :)
@Schaex14 жыл бұрын
@@easymathematik Oooh, I see. Thanks a lot ^^
@easymathematik4 жыл бұрын
@@Schaex1 Your welcome. :)
@MarcoMate874 жыл бұрын
Before commuting the order of the sums we should prove that the double series is convergent (absolutely, but it has positive terms so simple and absolute convergence are coincident). This calculus you showed doesn't prove that the series converges, it only proves that if the series converges, the value of the double sum is 6.
@user-A1684 жыл бұрын
Good
@guill39784 жыл бұрын
6 is already 110
@tasnimmahfuznafis88924 жыл бұрын
At around 1:40, he exchanged m and n and it changed the form of the problem yet did not affect the total sum somehow. I am in high school now and do not understand how that could have happened. Can someone please explain to me how that happened or what topic I need to study to understand that part?
@sensei97674 жыл бұрын
𝓐 𝓔 𝓢 𝓣 𝓗 𝓔 𝓣 𝓘 𝓒
@kshitijsharma31704 жыл бұрын
😭it's difficult
@l1mbo694 жыл бұрын
I'd say it's easier than most Olympiad problems.. although the first step would be quite unnatural for someone's first time (it was for me at least)
@lucatanganelli58494 жыл бұрын
This is a good place to stop saying this is a good place to stop. Whoever thought of editing that "good place to stop" compilation just made this guy's endings so awkward. Anyway great video Mike.