Sir! There should be a Nobel price for excellence in teaching! And You should get the first!
@nicholasjaikeran50416 жыл бұрын
Best mathemati
@joshuacharlery58264 жыл бұрын
🙂
@chronicsnail66753 жыл бұрын
Feynam gets one and Leonard susskind get ons
@christianjaycanilang14773 жыл бұрын
I agree❤❤
@shielalabapis46243 жыл бұрын
Q
@buffysummers11773 жыл бұрын
I was stuck on this topic for such a long time and in only 9 minutes I understood it, you really saved me an all-nighter. Thank you so much. Your teaching is phenomenal.
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped!
@ladyvader43586 жыл бұрын
Nobel prize for teaching!You are a great teacher, sir!Thanks for all the tutorials!
@MichelvanBiezen6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comment.
@ii_ragee7523 жыл бұрын
this professor saved the day. I spent hours trying to understand this stuff till I watched this thanks PROFESSOR. 9 minutes saved 24 hours.
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
glad it helped.
@philipjohn13382 жыл бұрын
You, Sir, are the kind of professor I need.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad you found our videos! 🙂
@melissapardo26887 жыл бұрын
You're the best! I wish you were my professor.
@jacobb73794 жыл бұрын
Bruh this is so beautifully smooth. I was literally melting my brain before but not I can answer these questions in 2 seconds. Also, I’m not at university yet, but I can still understand this because of the really easy method of assuming the direction of current. Thank you so much sir
@enviivalentin94034 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to say THANK YOU! I've watched like 10 videos trying to understand this Law and honestly, you've made it so easy to understand!! In very short steps which I love!
@dewmiranasinghe4039Ай бұрын
10 hour lesson in 9 minutes he saved my life god bless sir
@MichelvanBiezenАй бұрын
Thank you. Glad you found the video helpful
@chinny33932 жыл бұрын
I really recommend this proffesor. Ive been struggling to anwer my homework for 3 hours but within just 9 minutes I manage to finish it with the help of this video. THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR!!
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Glad you found our videos. We have covered all topics in physics on this channel.
@zerograv7 жыл бұрын
thank you ...you saved me because i just couldn't wrap my head around it ... now i only need to find out how to put it in a matrix and i'll be set ^^
@thapedimahapa25642 жыл бұрын
You out of all the videos I have seen have made me understand kirchoffs rule. Especially when it comes to the direction convention for voltages. Keep it up sir
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad you found our videos and you found them helpful. 🙂
@sleeping4cat2 жыл бұрын
Not gonna lie! I missed some lectures of my Electrical Physics class. And I tried to make it up using Khan Academy and other videos and online resources unfortunately all pf them were crappy except this guy! He made Kricchoff's rule sound so easy now I can easily take nap knowing I'm prepared for my exams! Thanks Man!
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@abdussalamadeagbo74412 жыл бұрын
After watching your videos I actually have confidence for my exams. You are truly a great teacher. Thank you.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Happy to hear that! Good luck on your exams.
@apangmasan3462 жыл бұрын
I love your precise teaching. Straight and clear. Appreciate your intelligence
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Glad you found our videos!
@spartacusferdo11783 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much..honestly..I went through several videos...but you gave me the enlightenment..even in school, this went terribly wrong! especially the direction of the flow, you mentioned it clearly! just fafded away my doubts! thank you, Sir!
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome
@savahnnacunningham74638 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU! You are a gifted teacher and I learn so much from watching your videos.
@flitzert37163 жыл бұрын
The World need people like you profesor
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, we appreciate your comment.
@nicholasjaikeran50416 жыл бұрын
Best mathematics and physics teacher in the world
@sudheerm.s67922 жыл бұрын
Only this guy in KZbin clearly got an idea about kirchhoff's law.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad you like the videos on Kirchhoff's laws.
@dinusiva30196 жыл бұрын
Sir ur a great teacher......u deserve a hatts off......
@mmabathomakhura23812 жыл бұрын
After watching multiple videos over a few months , i got even more confused but today i stumbled upon this video and i understand this topic. Thank you sir for the great work
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped!
@Lew.67 ай бұрын
Just left this open on my laptop for revision tomorrow. I bet it will help more than any of my dumb lecturers
@MichelvanBiezen7 ай бұрын
Hope it was helpful.
@mrmillmill2 ай бұрын
By far the most excellent online course on basic engineering circuit analysis even compared to the college courses
@TheCeremoniesOfIsrael3 жыл бұрын
U are brilliant God has designed u perfectly to help humanity God bless u
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
I am blessed to be able to serve.
@rollandjeffersonmejia59837 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir. I will recommend you to all of my friends. Keep on making tutorial! By the way you look like Steve Jobs :)
@ricebubbles-v5w2 ай бұрын
Stuck on this for 2 flipping years....2...and just picked it up in 9mins....the time I've wasted...the time 😢
@RayleenSevua Жыл бұрын
Sir! You are the best professor I need.
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Glad you found our videos. 🙂
@danielgray2280 Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot, I am a senior high student and I have been facing problem but becus of you I now understand it well
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Great! Glad you found our videos. 🙂
@setenaysimsek46675 жыл бұрын
I LOVE YOU SO MUCH.You are the best teacher ı have ever seen.I don't have to memorize everthing no longer
@yohanneskebede2323 Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir, you are really the best teacher ever.
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks. We appreciate your comment. 🙂
@Drone360pilot Жыл бұрын
Bravo! Mr. Michel !!! Brilliant and clean explanation ! Deep respect ! 🤓
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Glad you found it helpful. 🙂
@joannabaidoo3317 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH ! I WISH I KNEW YOUR ADDRESS TO SEND YOU LOADS OF GIFTS. YOU ARE GIFTED ! PLEASE KEEP DOING WHAT YOU ARE DOING GOD BLESS YOU !
@sunnysun63588 жыл бұрын
Hi, is there any other way u could explain the general sign convention when applying KVL? And in the case of loop 2, why is the equation 8 i2+ 6 i3 -4=0 instead of 8 i2+ 6 i3 +4=0. Isn't the current flow opposite to direction of loop for 4V voltage source? Many thanks :)
@MichelvanBiezen8 жыл бұрын
Since you are going around loop 2 in a counterclockwise direction, you cross the battery from the positive end of the battery to the negative end, thus there is a 4V voltage drop. When picking current directions in each branch it doesn't matter if the directions are correct. (The assumed directions could be opposite to the real directions). Then work out the problem as is shown. If you picked the incorrect direction, your answer(s) will come out negative.
@sequii_chan21 күн бұрын
question, in 5:58 how did you get the (3) for multiplying equation 3?
@cosmocelli6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this! I've learned so much from watching you videos. Kudos to you sir!
@hrithikkhemani32303 жыл бұрын
amazing thank you i wish i had him has a teacher.
@jonathana9236 Жыл бұрын
I have a problem similar to this except with different numbers and have had trouble with the currents. Major Thank you for this
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Glad it helped! 🙂
@domfackloic89302 жыл бұрын
Sir I just want to say am very happy with the explanation it going to help alot and I also want say keep up
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad you found our videos. 🙂
@domfackloic89302 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen yes sir and hope to see more
@purixlupa13 жыл бұрын
Sir thank you for always posting helpful videos. 🙏
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Always welcome
@mathiasgrenacs36808 ай бұрын
3 unknown currents. Use Kirchoff's laws (1st law once, 2nd law twice) and Ohm's law to establish system of 3 algebraic equations. Put that in any math software or any TI, HP pocket calculator and it's done.
@MichelvanBiezen8 ай бұрын
Yes indeed, solving the 3 equations 3 unknowns type of problem can be done with any app or program or calculator which has that programmed. But it is important that we learn how to do that.
@cosmos83662 жыл бұрын
At 7:50 when you moved 6(-0.308) to the other side you changed te negative sign to a positive which i get but why didn't the positive 6 change to a negative. I'm still learning algebra so I'm still learning all the tricks of moving everything around. Thanks David.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
- 6 (0.308) = 6 (- 0.308) but that is NOT equal to -6 (- 0.308) = 6 (0.308)
@cosmos83662 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen looking at your answer I couldn't figure out but after doing the calculations now it makes sense. doing it your way gets a positive1.848 which is right. doing it my way would have resulted in a -1.848 which is wrong. As a beginner I would not have known that and would have changed the 6 to a negative. Is that allways the case, if a number is multiplied by a number in brackets you change the sign of the numbers in the brackets but the number outside the bracket you don't change. Isthere some kind of albebra rule that states that. Thanks for your help David
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Yes, you have to be VERY careful with the signs doing these types of problems.
@bobsual3912 Жыл бұрын
Thank u helps a lot. Im a grade12 students for the Philippines
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Great! Glad you found our videos. Welcome to the channel! 🙂
@RowardRowapore2 ай бұрын
Thanks sir. You are amazing. You pushed me out where i stucked.
@christophersparkes29868 ай бұрын
Thank god for this video. I was about to lose my mind.
@MichelvanBiezen8 ай бұрын
Glad you found it, 🙂
@RickoRiak4 ай бұрын
Finally i understand it, After long time
@ShlomsDaGangSta8 жыл бұрын
When you find the other currents, why do you plug in -.0308 Amps for I3. What if i assumed the correct direction for I3 at first, and got a positive value, then my I1 and I2 would be different values
@MichelvanBiezen8 жыл бұрын
+Shlomo No, you would get the same values for I1 and I2, no matter what direction you assume for any of the currents.
@sarah530626 ай бұрын
The loops must be in the same direction? Both clockwise, or both anti-clock. Or can I do ine clock and the other anti-clock?
@MichelvanBiezen6 ай бұрын
They do not need to be in the same direction. You can go around each loop in any direction you like.
@MG-vb6ms5 жыл бұрын
Can we apply Ohm's law for 4 ohm resistance and 10 v voltage? In that case current I1 will be equal to 10/4=2.5amp.which does not match with our I1.
@MichelvanBiezen5 жыл бұрын
No, you can't use the simple Ohm's law equation here because you have multiple voltage sources. Each source affects each branch in a way that is difficult to predict, unless you use Kirchhoff's rules.
@MG-vb6ms5 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen Thanks a million for the fast reply.
@mubarakrikiji65482 жыл бұрын
Nice job sir . Indeed i enjoyed the lecture . Keep on making life easy for us
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! 🙂
@deadbunnyeyes1902 жыл бұрын
Is it possible to obtain the currents in a situation exactly like this but with another resistor at the second loop? I reckon it wouldn't be since there'd be 4 unknowns but only 3 equations...
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
You can have any number of resistors in any of the loops and this method will still work. We have examples like that.
@appleship43692 жыл бұрын
Important question, is it wrong if i chose the direction of the current different for each loop? U choose clock wise if i chose anti clockwise for the first loop and clockwise for the second will it still add up corectly? Thx
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
You can choose the direction any way you like, (as long as you remain consistent throughout the problem). If you get a negative answer for the current, the actual direction is opposite to your chosen direction).
@spurti3 жыл бұрын
Hii I have a question about the battery is that inside of the battery you have electrons because of redox rxn's and there are electrons more (8 electrons for example) at the negative terminal and there are less electrons at the positive terminal (3 electrons). And I found out that at the negative terminal the electric potential of 8 electrons is (-8J/C) and the electric potential at the positive terminal, the electric potential of 3 electrons is (-3J/C) and when I take the voltage of the 2 points of electric potential then I got two possible answers that is +5V and -5V and I am not sure which one should I use???
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
The side with the least electrons (let's call it A) is at a higher potential than the side with the greater number of electrons (let's call it B) Then A - B is + 5 V and B - A = - 5 V
@woodychelton5590 Жыл бұрын
is it correct to say that the voltage in that bottom node that I2 passes into via the 8 ohm resistor is 0?
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Since the node is not connected to ground we don't know. Only if that section of the circtuit is connected to ground do we know that the voltage is zero.
@taiwoonasanya27463 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir,I wish you were my professor
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Happy to help
@biridun99996 ай бұрын
Why I1 and I2 goes down together instead of them splitting some of their currents to the both resistors i did not get that.
@biridun99996 ай бұрын
Oh i get it now, divided the problem into two sections and calculated the currents of each voltages then combined them together and got the same results.
@MichelvanBiezen6 ай бұрын
Great. Glad you figured it out.
@OmarAhmed-sr2bt5 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation Profesor!
@yeonieee13 жыл бұрын
Sir, In getting the I2 why 6(-0.308)-4 becomes 4+6(0.308). I'm confused. It should 4-6(0.308), right?
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
We moved the two terms to the other side and therefore the sign changes. A - B - C = 0 becomes A = B + C
@zanebraunstein836618 күн бұрын
you are an amazing teacher. Thank you.
@chinwubaamadi5 ай бұрын
I don't seem to get it. Why are we multiplying it by 2 and 3? Is it because of the equation tag (Equation 2 & Equation 3).
@MichelvanBiezen5 ай бұрын
It is an algebra technique to solve the two equations two unknowns type of problem.
@abioladivine-peaceokikijes16572 жыл бұрын
Thank you Please will changing the position of any one voltage source change any of the equation
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Not if the voltage source remains oriented the same way and stays on the same branch. Once it is moved to a different branch, it will change the equations.
@abioladivine-peaceokikijes16572 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen you actually replied. I love you Siirrr. Thank you, I understand
@martingregson71364 жыл бұрын
OK So at 5:34 you have stated that multiplying eq x 2 and eq 3 x 3 both both i1 from Eq1 and Eq2 become equal opposites canceling each other out, but how and why do we need to do this?
@MichelvanBiezen4 жыл бұрын
This is just one of the many methods that can be used to solve simultaneous equations, so we can determine the current in each branch.
@clownbag21734 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen so are the answers suppose to the same in terms of like the 24 for example or can it be different
@successmotivation29974 жыл бұрын
Please dont stop teaching your a expert
@Realayyes4 жыл бұрын
5:57 how am i suppose to know what number to multiply ?
@MichelvanBiezen4 жыл бұрын
That is a technique we learn in algebra when we use the elimination technique of solving simultaneous equations. What numbers do we multiply with so that the coefficients of one of the variable become the same? We could have used 14 and 8, but that would make the numbers very big.
@Realayyes4 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen thank you
@NkemkaGentle10 ай бұрын
Thanks so much sir for this 💯it made me understand better as beginner, But where my problems lies now is at your final answer in I2 i couldn't understand how you got 0.731A Pls sir can you explain it to me I'm just a beginner 🙏🏾
@MichelvanBiezen10 ай бұрын
Use equation 3 which only contains I2 and I3 and I3 is known. So substitute for I3 and now you have an equation with only 1 variable I2.
@NkemkaGentle10 ай бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen thank you so much sir I've gotten it I really appreciate, you're one in a million teachers 💯
@austinfritzke93054 жыл бұрын
You need a nobel prize for teaching just for that bow tie
@pradipbista6076 жыл бұрын
sir, why did you assume loop2 in a clockwise direction?
@MichelvanBiezen6 жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter. You can assume either direction and it will work.
@christopherwilkins8954 Жыл бұрын
Surely there's a better way to do these problems... Been stuck on these Loop and Junction rules all semester. How do you know which variable to solve for first for?
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
This is a very classic example of the use of Kirchhoff's rules. Hopefully after watching a few examples it will make sense. (We have similar examples in the physics playlists as well which is a prerequisite to this course).
@RichardJrEtil3 жыл бұрын
In 7:54 the +6 (-0.308), when you move it to the other side it must become -6 (+0.308) am I right? please enlighten me... thanksss
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
No, what is shown in the video is correct. (Note that the 6 and (-0.308) are multiplied, not added)
@RichardJrEtil3 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen i wish you were my professor thanks sir!!
@treemanfan77182 жыл бұрын
Could you correct me? I put i3 as clockwise which created i1 = i2+ i3. I moved the terms to get i1-i2 = i3. I plugged this into resistor 6 creating 6(i1-i2). Doing the system of equations I get an i1 of -0.18 which is different from your answer.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
The answers in the video are correct. 6(i1 - i2) is not correct as a voltage drop
@anhdo63515 жыл бұрын
very good and helpful lectures from you. Hope all the best for you.
@wendymari85042 жыл бұрын
Thanks, this really helped me to understand it easier
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that!
@vinoriawareba9438 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the help sir ☺️.. great explaination 🤌🏼
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Thank you. You are welcome.
@paulperriman91444 жыл бұрын
I had an issue understanding how to do this..well.. not any more great teaching.. still not sure of the math procedure but very good.
@shnurik015 жыл бұрын
why did you multiply the 1st equation by 2, and 2nd equation by 3? is that just random?
@MichelvanBiezen5 жыл бұрын
That is an algebraic method of solving 2 linear equations. (method of elimination)
@chillcloud8904Ай бұрын
how do you know what factor to multiply the equations by?
@MichelvanBiezenАй бұрын
This is an algebra trick. You multiply one (or both) of the equations in order to eliminate one of the variables, when you add the two equations.
@keldonchase44922 ай бұрын
You calculated I1 to be positive, which means the direction you chose for I1 initially was correct. But looking at the diagram, I1 travels from the negative terminal to the positive terminal. Doesn’t this contradict the rule that conventional current is supposed to travel from positive to negative? What am I missing here? I would appreciate any feedback; thanks so much for your help :)
@bangtanedhoe41077 ай бұрын
is the process still the same if our teacher has given us the same structure example as yours but the difference is the middle part is an ampere load and we have another resistance on both lower parts of the rectangle. What should I do? please help😢
@MichelvanBiezen7 ай бұрын
Yes the process will be exactly the same, using Kirchhoff's rules.
@bangtanedhoe41077 ай бұрын
Should I combine the value of resistors on the upper and lower branch on both sides since it is in series so the structure can be the same as yours or should I just let it be and solve it as it is like you did?
@philipchan55353 жыл бұрын
If the + - side of that 4V battery is flipped, would the first equation still be i1+i3=i2?
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
The method is to assume the three current directions, regardless how the components are connected. If you guess wrong initially, you will end up with a negative answer, indicating the current is actually in the opposite direction.
@philipchan55353 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen ok thank you.
@yusufmustafa73232 жыл бұрын
Sir , I have a question What will happen if we take one loop clock wise and the other one anti clockwise Or one of them anti clockwise and the other clockwise.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter. You will get the same result. (but you have to keep track of your voltage rises and drops according to the direction you choose. Note by reversing direction, you'll get the negative result of the result you got from your original direction.
@mahlatsesteam36705 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much sir for your tutorials..means a lot to me
@AG-cx1ug2 жыл бұрын
When we draw the Loop 2 - its in the opposite direction to I3 - I didn't understand this part. Thank you.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
The arrows in the center of the loops, simply show the direction of "travel" around the loop (which is independent of the current direction) in order to add up all the voltages. KVL
@hirunrashentha10823 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot sir 😊 Excellence teaching
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Most welcome
@ngetichvictor-7901 Жыл бұрын
Nice work sir,,,it is understandable sir 🎉
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it. 🙂
@xilavekonicholasbaloyi39786 жыл бұрын
so do I have to multiply with 2&3 for all de problems. when want to eliminate .. or to form equation 3
@MichelvanBiezen6 жыл бұрын
It depends on the equation. It will be different for every equation.
@eduardo07964 жыл бұрын
If I3 has a negative sign, it means we have chosen the incorrect path of the current flow. Does that mean that I3 is actually positive? If so, when you plug in those values to solve for I1, insteaf of adding I2 and I3 (because - times - equals +), shouldn't we be substracting the values and thus we would get a different answer for I1?
@MichelvanBiezen4 жыл бұрын
The answer is no. Remember that we calculated all the currents assuming current directions. If we get a negative answer for one of the currents, it simply means that the current is moving in the opposite direction as assumed. Nothing else changes.
@eduardo07964 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen Thank you so much for taking the time to clarify my doubt. Your videos are much appreciated.
@مفكال2 жыл бұрын
should I get the same result if I used the mesh analysis method?
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Yes, you should obtain the same result no matter what method you use.
@vigorixx Жыл бұрын
You have my appreciation.
@MichelvanBiezen Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Glad you found our videos. 🙂
@sangeethatatineni62145 жыл бұрын
Thank you soo much sir, it was soo helpful. Good job !!
@MichelvanBiezen5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comment.
@vernaamparo24863 жыл бұрын
this is amazing! but I'vebeen meaning to ask, how about the voltage in that similar diagram?
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
The voltage rises and voltage drops are added on any loop.
@vernaamparo24863 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen thank you! I just finished doing a task with similar missing points. hoping for more awesome content!
@carlosmiguelbarros3 жыл бұрын
6.24 - why do you add the equations instead of subtracting? According to my notes we have been subtracting in class… I’m confused
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
You can do it either way. The algebraic method of elimination can be done either way.
@SinenhlanhlaArnold6 ай бұрын
do you have videos with that involve dependent sources
@MichelvanBiezen6 ай бұрын
We have some.
@vedangisekra93994 жыл бұрын
Sir, do we have any short trick to solve these types of problems? I am preparing for NEET ( medical entrance exam in India ), so we have very little time to solve such problems... It would be great if you can tell a short trick. please
@MichelvanBiezen4 жыл бұрын
For this type of problem there is really no short cut. But that said, it does depend a lot on how the questions are asked on the exam. We are currently making a number of videos on the JEE advanced tests and often you don't have to work out the problem in detail to find the correct answers. We illustrate that in those videos. We haven't looked at the NEET exam yet. But we will and we'll try to determine how to best prepare for that. Our time is very limited, so we don't know when we can get to it.
@vedangisekra93994 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen oh ok thank you, sir
@carultch Жыл бұрын
@@vedangisekra9399 There is a shortcut. It's the method of superposition. To give an overview, you "turn on" one source at a time, and "turn off" the other sources.. Voltage sources become shorts when "turned off", and current sources become open gaps when "turned off". You then assign a point, or several points at which it is of interest to find the voltage, and would help you solve for everything else you'd like to know. Then you find the voltage at that point, exclusively due to each individual source. Then you add up the partial voltages, to find the total voltage at the waypoint you assigned. You then have the voltage at that point, which you can use to solve for everything else. This turns algebra into plug-and-chug arithmetic.
@yashasvprajapati68516 жыл бұрын
Sir, Is if important to take the direction of the loop in the same direction as yours or can We reverse the direction of loop in Loop 2. How do we determine the direction of loop? Could you please explain sir, It would be great. Thanks!
@MichelvanBiezen6 жыл бұрын
The direction is completely arbitrary. (you can pick any direction)
@axelgayondato51105 жыл бұрын
Is it really a must that the direction of the first loop that you assign must be the same for second loop? And also, is it okey if I will assign a counterclockwise direction on loop 2 even if the loop 1 travels in a clockwise direction?
@MichelvanBiezen5 жыл бұрын
Sure you can choose any direction for any of the loops.
@axelgayondato51105 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen thank you so much sir. ☺️
@mariecurie4657 ай бұрын
What if if theirs another resistor both left and after on I2 sir ?
@MichelvanBiezen7 ай бұрын
Simply add all the resistors on any branch. It will not change the method of how to solve this type of problem.
@itrstt666 жыл бұрын
Why is direction of loop number 2 against I3 direction?
@MichelvanBiezen6 жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter. The direction you go around the loop is completely arbitrary.
@itrstt666 жыл бұрын
Michel van Biezen thank you
@xcarnage86326 жыл бұрын
sir you are god in disguise... thank you
@MichelvanBiezen6 жыл бұрын
Not in the least. Just another person trying to do his little part in the world.
@mercyalegada58113 жыл бұрын
Great sir! But i have a question sir, how about the circuit only have 1 voltage, 1 current entering and 3 current leaving ? There are 3 loops in total now , Thank youu sir ❤️
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
If there is only one voltage source, then it becomes an easy problem and you don't have to use Kirchhoff's rules.
@TheH1TM4NxL3W16 жыл бұрын
What do you do if you have two resistors in the middle (i2) and only want current and voltage across one of the resistors in the middle?
@MichelvanBiezen6 жыл бұрын
Since they would be in series, the current through both will be the same and the voltage across each would be (i2) x (R)
@TheH1TM4NxL3W16 жыл бұрын
thank you, very much appreciated! great videos
@TheH1TM4NxL3W16 жыл бұрын
sorry to be a pain, but does it matter which side of the battery your 4ohm resistor is? as on the circuit im doing my resistor is below where your 10v battery is
@TheH1TM4NxL3W16 жыл бұрын
sorry to be a pain, but does it matter which side of the battery your 4ohm resistor is? as on the circuit im doing my resistor is below where your 10v battery is
@MichelvanBiezen6 жыл бұрын
No, as long as the resistor is on the same branch.