Thank you for giving us such amazing lessons for free, without this I would have suffered a lot more in physics.
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
We are glad the videos are helping. Thanks for sharing.
@Priscilla.097 жыл бұрын
Thank you for being such a great teacher! More useful than my college professor's lectures.
@erbyghazar73723 жыл бұрын
Like always, amazing. I dont know why we people finde the best teachers just in KZbin chanels :) . You explain clean and fast. Thank you.
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Glad the videos are helping.
@valeriereid233711 ай бұрын
Physics at its best! Many thanks, I appreciate these lectures.
@MichelvanBiezen11 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@mohamedsherif21914 жыл бұрын
You are wonderful, really you are the best in many branches of physics comparing to others
@MichelvanBiezen4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words
@prince-mercyhabtemariam34122 жыл бұрын
This guy is literally pulling me over to the light
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
Glad you found our videos helpful! 🙂
@strongbodystrongmiind3 жыл бұрын
Honestly without you, I would’ve have gotten through physics! No one matches your explanations man I’m telling you
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Great 👍
@randomyoutube19979 жыл бұрын
I honestly fucking love you... you are dadbod dadhair life goals
@Ray-ye8gz7 жыл бұрын
How did you know that the thetas are equal? I saw 3 theta in this video but I didn't understand why the thetas are considered equal... especially, the two thetas at the upper one...
@MichelvanBiezen7 жыл бұрын
Because of the rules of similar triangles. The two beams going from the 2 slits to the screen are essentially parallel (they don't look parallel on this drawing because the distance between the 2 slits are greatly exaggerated in order to show the details).
@Ray-ye8gz7 жыл бұрын
I don't really know how to thank you... As I was suffering a lot with this misconception Thanks a lot!
@debarghyachattopadhyay26146 жыл бұрын
Really ?
@shahananizar69913 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your wonderful lecture, it was very helpful!
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing, glad it was helpful.
@LiveLetsLife2 жыл бұрын
What occurs when the waves are neither perfectly in phase nor a half cycle out of phase at a point? Do they still constructively/destructively interfere but to a lesser degree?
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
That is correct. If you watch the remainder of the videos on this topic we cover the cases in between as well. (for both interference and diffraction).
@roselynnwood46572 жыл бұрын
They would make a bright spot but of much lesser intensity because some of the wavelength is getting cancelled when they are a little out of phase but some of it is still in phase and that would not be cancelled so theres a little light
@hythe49368 ай бұрын
So because for very small values of x, Tan x and SIn x are indifferent we can basically say that they are equal
@MichelvanBiezen8 ай бұрын
That is correct.
@FA-cr6qf9 жыл бұрын
awesome videos, very helpful.
@deepakchandravanshi62747 жыл бұрын
suppose if we get 6 maximas including central one,then what about the intensities of all maximas.are they have different intensity or same.
@MichelvanBiezen7 жыл бұрын
They tend to drop off. There are videos in the playlist that describe that in more detail.
@russellkane94393 жыл бұрын
Great lesson as usual
@MichelvanBiezen3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! 😃
@ranitbanerjee9562 жыл бұрын
Sir I have a doubt.What is the thickness of one bright fringe?(I am not asking fringe width) Sir please answer.
@MichelvanBiezen2 жыл бұрын
The word "thickness" is mostly associated with path length traveling through the medium or object. That is not used or needed with a double slit interference pattern. If you have a specific example in mind we may be able to answer this question better.
@TheMacC1176 жыл бұрын
Why do teachers insist on telling us that the rays are parallel, and then talk about them coming together? The literal definition of parallel lines is that they will never touch. Ever.
@nyasajain8375 жыл бұрын
Reasonable Gump Well...actually there are parallel rays its just that there is a coverging lens (convex lens ) in the setup too ...to coverge the light ...the lens is not usually shown to avoid complexity ...hope it helps u
@KnightofGreeness5 жыл бұрын
The rays are parallel as they approach the slits. When they go through the slits, the rays diffract, becoming Huygens sources and going in all different directions, making them able to interfere with eachother. The parallel-ity ends after they pass through the slits.
@georgeabreu63925 жыл бұрын
In short, that’s a physics thing. It still works for modeling reality.
@markberardi1097 жыл бұрын
Hi, just comparing to destructive interference to mechanical waves: in a sound waves, when high p meets low p there will be destructive interference; in water waves, when a peak meets a trough there will be destructive interference; with light waves through a slit ... the light waves are out of phase and cancel with each other? This seems odd, because normally if you have 2 light sources they seem to add in intensity. Is this always the case or is possible to get light sources to have destructive interference?
@MichelvanBiezen7 жыл бұрын
When that was first discovered it was revolutionary. It is indeed correct that light experiences destructive and constructive interference. In order to see it you have to use monochromatic light, thin slits with a small separation distance, etc.
@MohamedGamal-rv3cm7 жыл бұрын
Dear , I'm one of your fans, honestly , I didn't this video, I think you have time to create another one with showing the relationship in theta , coz I'm confused. deriving is not clear, thank you sir
@MichelvanBiezen7 жыл бұрын
This is explained in the playlist: PHYSICS 61 DIFFRACTION OF LIGHT
@andrewskyworker10 жыл бұрын
y length should be a litte longer , if we take your y length then it would not be 90 degree against L ,? y should go down a liitte bit more to descirbe tan (theta)?
@MichelvanBiezen10 жыл бұрын
Remember that y is very small compared to the distance to the screen. (L >> y) We draw it this way so you can see what is going on (not to scale)
@Peter_19867 жыл бұрын
I once tried deriving an equation for the actual geometry in an interference pattern, and that equation was horrible. I think it became a transcendental equation or something like that.
@jacobvandijk65258 жыл бұрын
Why should two constructively interfering waves always give a central maximum? By moving the screen you could make that a central minimum, isn't it???
@MichelvanBiezen8 жыл бұрын
The location of the fringes is a function of angle, although the angle will change as you move the screen closer or farther away. The central max should be directly perpendicular to the slits on the screen, regardless of the distance to the screen. There is no difference in path length for the central max, therefore the distance to the central max doesn't matter.
@jacobvandijk65258 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Michel. I'm trying to understand what you wrote ;-)
@maghroorali7338 жыл бұрын
is it possible for sustainable images to disappear in youngs double slit experiment??if yes den how
@MichelvanBiezen8 жыл бұрын
What do you mean by a "sustainable" image?
@maghroorali7338 жыл бұрын
Michel van Biezen bright images
@MichelvanBiezen8 жыл бұрын
If you shine a monochromatic (single wavelength) light through a double slit, you will see a series of bright spots and dark spots on a screen in front of the double slit.
@maghroorali7338 жыл бұрын
Michel van Biezen the fringes can disappear if we increase or decrease the slit distance??
@MichelvanBiezen8 жыл бұрын
The separation distance between the fringes will increase when you decrease the distance between the slits. Watch the other videos in the playlist on the topic for more understanding
@cisomophiri68776 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@unbelievable15604 жыл бұрын
Can someone help me please. In some notebooks for destructive interference it says that delta x=(2m-1)*lambda/2 and in other there is plus sign after m. Help!
@MichelvanBiezen4 жыл бұрын
It is just a different mathematical way to say the same thing. if m is an integer then 2m - 1 = 1 (m=1) 2m - 1 = 3 (m = 2) 2m - 1 = 5 (m = 3) (and then it is multiplied by lambda / 2) or m + 1/2 (and then it is multiplied by lambda) the result is you end up with the exact same thing
@unbelievable15604 жыл бұрын
@@MichelvanBiezen Thank you man, i can't tell you how much you are an inspiration.
@nahidfarzin68335 жыл бұрын
It's helpful
@_John_Sean_Walker4 жыл бұрын
½λ = 333nm 1½λ = 999nm d < ½mm L = 2m L/d = 4000 Where is the first dark spot?