Michi Asked for Philosophical Question but her Brain Couldn't Handle It..

[@KFPSchnitzelkochTschango]

"WTF are you? HIGH?" Michi thats what ive been asking ever since you started talking.

[@chriskwakernaat2328]

sometimes she is , sometimes she's not.

[@somerandomguy7100]

Schrodinger’s zooted

[@tbk2010]

"Old people are 4D" Yes Michi. I just turned 40 and suddenly I had an extra dimension that wasn't there before...

[@bananaraptor7747]

the joint dimension

[@Ghost_Embers]

Well yeah the random pain. 😅

[@lonepigeon68]

@@bananaraptor7747 bit do the joints help with joint pain?

[@maissthro3645]

Man... She ended up like a stereotype of a Florida surfer: "woooooaaaahhhh... That's sssoooo deeeep, bruh..."

[@edgaratio]

Some things just never change. Water flows, fire burns, and Michi doesn't understand semi common knowledge.

[@ghostagent3552]

but then comes the sciencey stuff like how the chemical reaction that is fire also produces water and you can make things colder using sound.

[@NekuraKero]

​@@ghostagent3552 whaaaaat

[@ghostagent3552]

@@NekuraKero CH4+2O2=CO2+2H2O. Aka hydrocarbons combusting in rooms with oxygen will give you carbon dioxide and water. Anyways, watch NighthawksInLight's video on acoustic refrigeration for the sound thing or some vids about how we can make the JWST so cold and you'll also get the same info on that.

[@Bloddrake]

Look the Theseus's Paradox might be semi common knowledge to us in the west, butt i actually find it reasonable that a mid 20? Indonesian woman have never heard of a nearly 1900 year old Greek thought experiment.

[@ghostagent3552]

@@Bloddrake it just means that she's not chronically online like us

[@Sergei_WHY]

Michi getting casually mindblown while trying to make sense of science and philosophy is my favorite thing. Toaster did a great job feeding into that bit, at the low cost of some of his sanity.

[@jacobbesler3214]

This was a ride, going through the different topics. Ship of Theseus - she's cooking Color and reflectivity - she might be cooking too hard Multiple dimensions - Michi, turn off the stove

[@sandhiwistara9128]

Toaster : What is color ? Michi : I don't know I color Blind *end credit*

[@sergiudana8716]

Show Michi Imaginary numbers that'll be fun

[@chiichan3774]

Tho I have to argue that all numbers are imaginary, as they only exist in our minds.

[@ghostagent3552]

Hamiltonians and 3d+ matrixes would be even more fun if people could actually teach her that.

[@Grassie_D9938]

Oh yeah don't forget about chaos theory, it gets chaotic

[@breabnyan]

I died at old people part, it's so funny to see how every breakthrough leads to another wall

[@chriskwakernaat2328]

wait till she figures out that everything in space is falling , and being weightless in space , just means you are falling at the same speed..

[@edmg7]

Is that mind-blowing? I mean, I guess it doesn’t surprise me since I learned that’s what being “weightless” is back in fourth grade science.

[@Edino_Chattino]

​@@edmg7you'd be amazed how many people can't grasp this concept

[@Gnulcho]

If you're talking about orbiting around the Earth, it's technically drifting away at the same speed you're attracted due to gravity. Once you get enough distance to any massive body, you're no longer falling, but everything will distance itself (technically it's the expansion of empty space, rather than physically moving iirc) from you in an ever increasing speed, until at one point it becomes physically impossible to get back, even with lightspeed (which ultimately causes the heat death of the universe). Well, that is how I understand relativity, which may be wrong. To clarify: As in I might not understand relativity correctly, not that relativity is wrong.

[@ghostagent3552]

But also falling doesn't really exist, the paths merely converge and bent to a point at the center of gravity. ScienceClic made a really good animation for spacetime curvature in proper 3d model (not bent 2d sheet)

[@NekuraKero]

Wdym by everything is falling ? Falling only exists when gravity exists ?

[@shingshongshamalama]

The way she pronounces the word "philosophical" is the funniest thing in this video.

[@jamesvivian2855]

Time being the fourth dimension is demonstrably real from time dilation occurring at high speeds

[@alchemicpink2392]

And also when calculating what the gravitational influences of celestial bodies are sometimes space falls out of the equation but time stays.

[@ryanpennington9592]

There are physicists working on both timeless and spaceless physics, trying to show that both space and time have no independent existence and merely emerge from deeper physical laws.

[@ParadiseDB7]

Not how dimensions work and also that debunks it being the 4th. Also... time exists for 2D objects as well. And 1D.

[@rowdeemunkee]

We should show her that "scale of the universe" video.

[@Spedatr0n]

That’d be interesting!

[@Feanor1988bis]

Trying to explain her that when you look at an object you are technically looking at how it was a certain time in the past would be funny too.

[@aizero-ih3uy]

espescially from metaball studios for that massive zoom out scaling

[@Sergei_WHY]

After that, maybe we can move on to PBS Space Time. Perhaps after some Kurzgesagt to ease her in a bit.

[@volbla]

The powers of 10? That's a bloody classic.

[@somedudewatchintv5297]

I always like it when Michi gets taught science. I remember when she was taught the difference between air and oxygen.

[@santiagolopezmedina5980]

Good to see Michi embraced absurdism at the end of her existencial crisis.

[@The.Mr.JBiggs]

9:15 unless you meet Zen, Haruka or Matara than you hit the Double D dimension

[@lonelystrategos]

The hypercube is fun, but Time Cube is where it's really at.

[@MiishaKorvian]

"SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY TIME CUBE" o7

[@bengrogan9710]

The differeential is if you are able to interact with the dimension A 2nd object can willing interact with the 2 dimensions - it exists in the 3d, but it cannot willingly change A 3 directional being can move willingly in 3 axis - but on the axis of time we are only in the present Time a 4th dimensional being is able to alter its position in the axis of time

[@Vanlifecrisis]

Yea, you can think of dimensions as constraints. A 3d object is constrained from controlled movement on the fourth.

[@friskdremeurluck7907]

Kinda wanna see michi super medicated with a super medicated mouse.

[@vehlinge]

My personal favorite existential crisis/“that’s deep dude” thought exercise: describe what nothing is 😂

[@DakkaBert]

i refuse. problem solved.

[@vehlinge]

@@DakkaBert either intentionally or not that accomplishes the task too lol

[@lemur6435]

the hypercube part killed me this was too funny

[@immortal_shrooms6757]

Fun fact: shrimp colours don't exist, they have more colour bits in their eyes but for individual colours, while humans have less colour bits but are able to mix colours

[@Lord_Marquaad]

So they see like a compressed color spectrum?

[@shingshongshamalama]

That's not how anything works. We don't "mix colours." Our brains simply assign what we call colours to various different of the red, green, and blue wavelengths defined by what each of our different cone cells detect. When an object you're looking at has a mixture rather than just one, that's what you see. If a shrimp looked at something that stimulated multiple different colour receptors at once, it would still see a combination of those individual wavelengths as well.

[@ghostagent3552]

​@@shingshongshamalamaif you think about it, all the vision we perceive is just a biological fourier wave conversion

[@toospooky051]

It's not an accurate metaphor but I like to think of it as the difference between standard definition and ultra high definition. A human 's and their cones can see at 720p, but a shrimp's eyes can see at 8k

[@bekfastlegend2715]

I’m going to butcher this explanation but an example I learned about the fourth dimension was to imagine someone was trapped in a three dimensional cage, if the person was in the fourth dimension, they could simply move to a time where he is not in the cage just like how a three dimensional person can escape a two dimensional cage by moving to the third dimension

[@hazamax2139]

I mean it's not like we decide to move from 2D to 3D. It's more that we can't be bound by two dimensions when we are three dimensional.

[@Accelerator370]

This why i love michi, in 20 minutes she learnt that she doesn't need to be smart to be happy, the best philosophical conclusion in history of mankind ❤

[@thatguyjared8560]

A study was actually published in 2014 debunking the mantis shrimp thing. Apparently the photoreceptors in human eyes are configured to make comparisons in the intensity of different light frequencies to blend colors, whereas the cones in the mantis shrimp's eyes rely on photoreceptors for individual colors, making them effectively worse at distinguishing different shades of color than humans.

[@francislelievre5172]

a good analogy for geometric dimensionality could be to imagine you have a 3x3x3 cube in minecraft, in position 1x1x1 you place a white wool, in position 2x2x2 you place pink wool & in position 3x3x3 you place red wool and the rest black, but you have a mod that allows you to instantly tp the yourself and a guide overlay of the chunk you are in to the Nether with one click, to the End with a second click & back to the Overworld with a third click, now the Nether & End are a spectrum of dimensionality just like Left-Right, Up-Down, Forward-Backward, Future-Past, Anawise-Katawise. so we can now think of the first cube as 3x3x3x1 and make cubes in the same place as 3x3x3x2 & 3x3x3x3 each with a different coloured block in position 1x2x3x2 & 1x2x3x3 and by moving block between the three overlapped cubes you are doing something like a Rubik's cube in 4D. Geometric dimensionality & Lorentz equations, Minkowski spacetime & Einsteinian spacetime are different things. a geometric hypercube is as separate from time as the idea of a square but the parabolic trajectory of a physical thrown block is time dependent, but the mathematical abstract of calculating the parabola isn't. time certainly is a dimension in multiple fields of math but also might not be IRL according to some physics theories.

[@RaidThren]

2:13 The Mochi Boat

[@spamreciever4208]

"You get that free with your 3rd dimension" is such a Hitchiker's guide to the Galaxy ass sentence lmao

[@grifferman]

It's always fun hearing people discover Cartesian mind/body duality for the first time.

[@gravityassist3492]

as someone who study quantum physics I definitely overqualified to enjoy Vtuber, yet here I am

[@Lord_Marquaad]

If Michi is your oshi than you're attracted to the opposite of your self :V

[@gravityassist3492]

@@Lord_Marquaad she completes me

[@ghostagent3552]

​@@gravityassist3492now go find us a magnetic monopole

[@MortZar]

Man I get it, she hurts, but we don't watch her to think, we watch vtubers to turn the brain off

[@hazamax2139]

Bro wdym there's no over or under qualifications for enjoying something lmao

[@PassiveSmoking]

Think of it this way. 3D is like a single frame of the film Toy Story. 4D is the entire film.

[@yunyunpilled]

I still remember someone explained it to me like reality is an infinite number of pictures being taken.

[@0ldgrumpyman]

Wait till she finds out that we are all 11 dimensional, but only perceive 4.

[@ParadiseDB7]

Literally in the video bud

[@ParadiseDB7]

And we can only perceive 2 dimensions

[@0ldgrumpyman]

@@ParadiseDB7 You don't have depth perception? Also she knows there are other dimensions, but I don't see here realizing that all matter has all the dimensions.

[@ParadiseDB7]

@@0ldgrumpyman oh sorry bud didn't realize you were an alien with freaky non human eyes. No bud, all humans, you included, perceive the world in 2D

[@ParadiseDB7]

@@0ldgrumpyman all humans, you included bud, perceive the world in 2D

[@LumiLunar]

Am I still the ship? 💀

[@somedudewatchintv5297]

20:14 I just got reminded of a KZbin video made by a former astrophysicist Dr Fatima. It's called something like Gravity is a social construct and that's OK. The thumbnail is just her with the caption "why we made dark matter up".

[@maxboot2115]

I like the logical conclusion of the Ship of Theseus: once everything is replaced, if you take the original parts and out them all together in the same original configuration...is that the Ship of Theseus? Is the new one? Are they BOTH?

[@Feanor1988bis]

The trick to answering the question is to define his property rights, but while you'd find a technically correct answer that way, the philosophical dilemma of whether it's still the same ship would remain unsolved. Also I'm pretty sure you can't replace the keel, because removing it would basically require building the ship back up from zero, and at that point it becomes hard to argue it is the same one even if you use parts salvaged from the old.

[@aizero-ih3uy]

@@Feanor1988bis so... that could be the answer, it's still the old ship because it's still has it's old irreplacable part of it in it, once you rebuild it from ground zero, that's when it becomes a different one

[@ELbabotas1]

But if you disassamble and reassemble a Pomni wodden string toy, piece by piece, seems like the same one unless changing the string that kept it together means it's a recycles thing, is the string the toy? Is the concept of toy the crossroad in wich matter and configuration meet? is the continuous existance of toy after it's first day of use just the human stubborness of wanting thing to persevere and remain? The moment a chip and a strand fall, it is no longer the object you originally saw and percieved, but it is still named the same, like a amnesiac person, like the son to a man, proud of its family name. The question is confusing by using Michi logic. If you want to mix fields, a thing can mean a thousand and be incongruent with itself. Things exist as a construct of the human mind desiring a simplified measurable outcome that can be used or avoided. The crossroad is like why we live, why the bear porridge is just right, Goldilocks is not on venus or mars, mercury or neptune. The right time, the right energy, the right conditions. The green line is where the true name lives. If a furry splinter is no longer Pomni, then the answer is that the new parts with no original are he true Toy. If the fallen is still a part but outside of it's main form, then the object is not broken or fixed, it grew, it expanded. Both are the true Toy. If the original factory provided components you first saw it with are what make it, then the Pomni is gradually decreasing, desappearing into the void, replaced by a new one. The Toy is dead. If somehow restored. What does restored mean? Somehow finding every atom that was ever shed? Or could we be talking furry splinter, and shape and configuration of inherited stuff, making the new toy with 'old' wood being filled the cracks with new unrelated material, also get he name of 'Toy'? Or is it as the biggest amount of non decreased material left? If restoration Has any part of original material, Toy was not dead or revived, if a molecule is not longer accountable for a name. If restoration has full molecular count as irrelevant and the conceptual material itself is main, then you get two different toys. The result depends of your preconception, and is non interchangeable with other people's ideas. Reality is formed by our hive minds, a connection of perceptions, when you are not there: there is no tree or forest, nor fall. Only hidrogen and carbon. Strong atraction. If you leave a computer working after the last breath ever given, the world still exists, alveat virtually. The is no universe with no life, there is calculations that show that, like the forth dimention(or the idea of a fifth), there is something outside of life, but not reality. When your eyes close, all Matter is Dark, and every day it grows closer. So, the answer depends on your beliefs. What IS? What does It mean? It's on you. When a concensus is achieved, everyone is on he same boat, and using the same measuring stick, an IF can be chosen as The One. In the mean time, who wants a wooden doll?

[@jaybee9213]

Why is it called the Ship of Theseus? It's because he owned the ship regardless if the parts were replaced as long as the original owner still have it.

[@sarahtopless6991]

with that question there is a simple answer because it is simple the ship is no longer the same ship because ALL of it has been replaced but with the body the brain organs and bones never get replaced so you are always you the only thing that is replaced is the skin mech

[@ellieechoes]

Toaster should just have explained string theory and she would've gotten it.

[@NinthSettler]

i once had a hallucinatory dream where i could see outer space in 4d. It was like a youtube video with a progress bar that i could scroll to make stars appear and disappear. Pretty cool.

[@edmg7]

This makes me want to see Michi play the Zero Escape series.

[@The.Mr.JBiggs]

The Big Bang is theoretically a 3-D instance as it's considered a fix point in time

[@0ldgrumpyman]

Unless Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology theory is right. Then time existed before the Big Bang.

[@daluven]

Damn

[@SDE1994]

the ship thing is a big contentious point in restoration, there is a big golden castle in Japan that burnt down a few decades ago and was rebuilt, it is considered the same castle by the government and JP historians, while in UK, the Flying Scotsman has has so many parts replaced several times its 100 year life that many consider it not the original FS

[@Bleats_Sinodai]

Color is a perception of different wavelengths. An object looks to be a certain color because it reflected that specific wavelength of light into your eyes.

[@BaristaBryanA]

Markiplier : could this toaster be one of my people ?

[@hartlettal8104]

💀💀 man you work really fast, nice clip!

[@BobAronius-xn4ub]

Really wanted him to talk about 2 watches and a train.

[@The_DGO]

The nervous system doesn’t get replaced much at all. Most of those cells are the same ones your entire life

[@gexianhen]

the idea of the book is kinda correct.if 4th dimentional being could see all the 3d universe as if it was a book , every second staked on top of himself

[@zamorvex]

as someone with tetrachromia i can confirm that everything in nature has way more color variance than what other people with 3 cones can see

[@r0landleaf370]

every 7 years, you technically have a new body.

[@Bjaz98]

A point/dot, is the cross-section of a line, which is the cross-section of a square, which is the cross-section of a cube, which is the cross-section of a tesseract.

[@zaraphehe8109]

Wtf are u high? Best impression michi. It should make animation

[@RhysHill-ur8lq]

This question is a matter of opinion in reality

[@DakkaBert]

Damn she really got us at the end

[@WhimsyHeath]

Someone should show Michi the videos from the creators of Miegakure- they are really good explanations about 4D things, they're mind bending.

[@Naut8233]

Human cells have always been my counter to the ship of theseus. Its still the same boat as things were relaced one at a time, if you were to rebuild the ship from nothing its a new ship, but so long as you build off the original, its still the original

[@lmjrenee]

To answer the question what is only in the 4th dimension is a 3d model in programming or even or a 3 dimensional image in your head

[@TheMrDavidCurran]

I like to think of this in terms of what we, as humans, can manipulate. I can pick up a drink bottle, move it up and down, side to side, and closer or further away, but I cannot move it further in time. We are fourth dimension beings, because we move in the fourth dimension, but can't manipulate it.

[@Nabekukka]

God I've missed these moments.

[@filippo5834]

You missed the simplest way to explain dimensions themselves and why we cant imagine (so we cant drow them as well) more dimensions than basic 3D + 1 dimentional time. Dimention itself is vector - direction we can move. So 1D directions are forward and backward, 2D additional directions are right and left. If you imagine compass it has N E S W directions and all of them are at "flat" surface and there are right angles between all of them and you can imagine "center point" in the middle of them where compass arrows are rotating. 3rd dimension additional directions are up and down so as you can expect surface changes into object couse another extra directions still have to be placed in right angle to rest of directions going out from "center point". And there we go with 4th direction, additional directions are named ana and kata (you could hear those names in biology as anabolism and katabolism, those are opposite mechanisms so thats why they were used as opposite directions), the point is you have to take our "center point" with forward, backward, right, left, up, down all in right angles to each other and add ana and kata in way to make all 8 directions to be in right angles to each other. Human brain is not ready to understand quantum's physics and thats why we cant drow diagram of 4 dimensions. But.. i didnt explain time dimensions yet so lets begin. Compare time 1st dimension to space 1st dimension (forward, backward), time 1st dimension move possibility is just forward - as explain we, earth, sun and everything we know is moving forward time, everything is getting older in simplest words. Sciense is allowing time to have more than one dimension and direction couse we couldnt regret it yet. Well.. 2nd time dimension allows to move backward in time but we didnt find how to. Its not end about time dimensions, couse as time is going forward and we are flowing with that its not fact we can go only with one small exacly path, take a look at road cross, you can go forward time with right space or left space (or other direction) but experiences proved that one physical 3D object can move through 2 holes in wall at once to 'land' on 2nd side of wall but only when object has no observer. Thats telling us we are going through many time directions in 1 dimension at once casually and unnoticeable. Another funfact, we are living in 3D space world (couse we cant imagine more space dimensions) but our eyes are seeing only 2 dimentional, when we are looking at cube we know its 99% cube or 1% illusion fake but we see it flat, we are looking at right, left and up walls of cube but we dont see rest, we can say rest doesnt exist couse we cant notice it by just looking from one perspective

[@Kokuki39]

I want to see her try to comprehend the other 7 dimensions XD

[@ZaraKijbhord]

"am I still the ship??" nahhh, what kind of question that lol

[@bxnaxmxxnaxx1914]

When your adorable brain mush cant handle the pounding science is giving it. But it's fun, even if one ultimately chooses from few available options. Even being willingly basic and loveable.

[@lollypopalopicus]

To add some more context to the hypercube. It's not a 4d cube, but a 4d cube's shadow. To explain, if you hold a cube up to a light, it's shadow on the wall is 2d, but you can make out that is a 3d cube's shadow based on it's shape, and the way it morphs as you move it. In the same way, just as 3rd cube makes a 2d shadow, a 4d cube hypothetically makes a 3d shadow. the hypercube is not actually a 4th dimensional cube, but a visual representation of what it's 3d shadow would look like.

[@PatLund]

One very important part of the Ship of Thesies is that he keeps all the original parts and puts them back together. The question then is which one is the Ship of Thesies?

[@Lord_Marquaad]

idk how many have written about this but to replace the board in the ship, each piece have to be cut in the ship in mind, so the design is still uniquely Theseus's. It's neat that the old ship still influence the new one. does that make sense?

[@ghostagent3552]

But then again, someone could just cut the ship further into a new shape entirely independent of the original ship. For example, if the ship was made of plastic, you could just melt it onto a new piece. All that's limited is the available material and our brains that are hooked on object permanence.

[@iandownes3130]

Look up "An immense world" by Ed Yong. If you didn't understand their light/color conversion.

[@turbulnceofawsm9940]

how dare he remind me of calc 3 and differential equations

[@ashardalondragnipurake]

wish i had a vtuber to explain simple things to this seems fun

[@scyrra9908]

0D = a dot, 1D = singlular point, 2D = completely flat, 3D = cubes & stuff, = 4D time (it getting later in the day is moving forward in time)

[@r0landleaf370]

3rd. dimension is for physical interface/interaction through the 4th.

[@MementoMori-kn4dh]

2D 2.5D 3D Theoretical 4D

[@Jaysonengineering]

Fun fact about shrimp colors! They have extra cones (color processors) because they don’t have the brainpower to blend colors to process things like purple, green, orange, etc. Instead, they have cones for those specific colors as well. I’m not sure if that makes sense, but effectively shrimp can’t see more colors than we can

[@SuperInsanewolf]

you lose certain childhood memories usually cause of trauma of some kind.

[@tiagotiagot]

The Sun looks yellowish because the bluer parts of it's light get spread more easily by the air (and that is also why sunsets and sunrises are redder, the blue got spread thin going thru more air due to the shallower angle, and the stuff closer to red is what's left); not all of it but a lot of it. So you would think it would be white without the air, right? But here is the big twist, it has a lot of light across a wide range of colors, and it would look white to us, but it is actually the brightest at the green frequency, the Sun is whiteish green! And our eyes and brain just compensate for that and make it look white!

[@volbla]

I feel like Toaster needed to go even more basic, like: what actually is light.

[@kittykaidoodles796]

Listening to laymen trying to describe science as if they're an authority and getting it WRONG is impossible to watch for me I want to correct him so bad so Michi gets the real info lol

[@CrazyGamebino]

i thought this story sounded familiar i just never learned the name but to answer the questions it is both still the ship and not the ship by the first replacement

[@DJAutonomous]

Him: "no."

[@Mutantroosta.Gaming]

i like my axe, its had 3 new handles and 2 new heads

[@Forchune]

Using time as the 4th dimension is pretty confusing. Using the flatland analogy to add a 4th spacial dimension is easier to explain imo.

[@rosl.]

Michi talking about class politics in fashion: 🤓☝️💯🧠💥🧠‼️ Michi when light exists: 👶

[@Lord_Marquaad]

Damn Eviltoaster is good teacher, I aspire to be like him

[@garethdewhurst1499]

maybe its my understanding but I feel like he didn't explain 4D very well, its about being able to navigate in those dimensions I think? so if, as 3D beings we can navigate to a point in a 3D space (like finding seats in a cinema), then a 4D person can navigate to that seat at any point in time, they can choose to go to that seat yesterday, then next year, then a week ago in same way that we can navigate to first one seat, then go to a different seat in the cinema.

[@michaelklim8277]

I would absolutely LOVE to just try to educate vtubers all day. It is always funny. On the hypercube, these gifs never made sense to me. The concept of an extra dimension made sense, but that weird fleshlight video didn't. But a few days ago, I saw a video of a hypercube being unfolded to appear as a 3D object like you would to a cube to make it 2D. It finally made sense visually. What these animations are trying to represent is that each side of a hypercube is actually a cube, and we get the weird shape from trying to bend the cubes to fit together as a 4D object. Also, I don't think that a hypercube is supposed to be the same fourth dimension that time is. A hypercube exists in our 3D space plus one of the other 11 spacial dimensions plus time like normal.

[@SLeoPereS]

im so glad i asked the 4D question

[@Homer92]

It didn't change. The whole is greater than the sum of it's parts, so that even if you gradually replace each part the ship is still the thesius, capable of things no single part is capable of.

[@hazamax2139]

If that's the case then every ship is the ship of Thesseus. They are all made of similar irrelevant (according to your point) pieces that put together are capable of doing what no single part is capable of, yet all other ships do.

[@LegitHarpyHunter]

I mean, technically people are four dimensional, we travel forward through time.

[@Ai_M3talloidX7]

Clocks can be whatever shape we make it. Square, rectangle, circle and ovals, triangle, octagon. They aren't limited to one shape or a device. I think I'm out of my depth here...

[@Octagram_]

Ah yes, the beginning of the short 13 hours stream

[@mutilixusX]

3:14 It's not about the ship, it's about the crew of the ship 😂 nakama forever

[@Udidda]

Seems like she understands string theory better than Toaster does, to be honest. She immediately noticed that it's not testable.

[@greedier-7661]

Well the problem is if we think of time as 4 dimension or not. We could think of 4 geometric dimension and it would simply make objects appear out of nowhere or reaper/ get bigger and change shape, he should have told her a 2d paper example, where we could place a cube on paper and people living there would only see square(well technically a line). So we humans are 4 dimensional beings as we live in 4 dimensions but are only capable of seeing 3 dimensions.(2 dimensional being could only see lines). If we take 4 dimension as time, 5 dimensional creature could see certain amount of time at the same time and interact with any point of it. On the other hand 4 dimension as a geometric type would make that 5 dimensional being simply be able to appear and disappear things warp their shape depending on their true 4 dimensional structure. The weird thing is that then everything we see would have hidden more complex shape as the same way even paper has 3 dimensions, we humans would have hidden 4 dimensional shape.

[@rezkel7404]

Here is a modern one, at what point in replacing parts does the old computer become a new computer?

[@KWifler]

Actually, they found out that your brain cells do get replaced. The reason you forget your childhood is because, during a stage of brain development, your brain chooses to destroy weak connections in order to improve brain efficiency. It can happen several times in some people.

[@BladeLigerV]

Now, what we need to do, is ask Henya about this stuff?

[@MortZar]

I feel like my braincells are dying while listing to michi breathing copium while trying to understand 3d. Also the 4th dimension is theorised to be time, but also other versions. Normally when explaining 1st dimension you say its a line, the second is then commonly a square, the thrid is a box, and we say that the fourth would be a box inside a box inside a box inside a box, and they are all inside each others, therefore when we draw it or simulate it, it becomes a moving image. Also man forgot to mention the aspect of theseus ship where we build a ship of the replaced parts, and have to ask yourself, which is the real ship of theseus.

[@FearenKuro]

i lost so many braincells watching this

[@alchemicpink2392]

In terms of moving through the 4th dimension: Nothing actively does that (which is why time travel is impossible), everything just exists at a new coordinate of time as it passes. Like, a second is the distance between two points in time the same way an inch is the distance between two points in space. Also big fucking note: THEORIES ARE PROVEN TO THE CURRENT BEST SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING. Edit: Nvm, a chatter pointed it out. And yeah, it's extremely important to get the difference between theory and hypothesis correct when talking about physics. Because "theoretical physics" are not "hypothetical physics".

[@VictorianSnailGod]

Did you know that physics is just applied philosophy?

[@neiljohnragas7449]

There's actually one question for the Theseus Boat: So, if the boat that was replaced all over is already a different boat, what if we built another boat using the parts. that was replaced, from the original boat. Which boat now is Theseus Boat? The newly built from the original parts or the current with replaced parts? I cracked the hell up on "if people are 3d, then old people are 4d"... WTF

[@johnj.spurgin7037]

If you think about it, everything we think is 3d is 4d because we perceive it as 4d creatures. We can't actually perceive 1D or 4D completely.