he's obviously in front of a green screen and totally not used to it. The guys in comment that mock him : i'd like to see you try it :D
@TheDarcWolph5 жыл бұрын
8:40 says NA for condenser is less than objective, but NA_cond > NA_obj
@manudehanoi6 жыл бұрын
the back ground slide at 16:30 doesnt make sense. If the diffracted light is focused on the quarter wave plate, then how can it be focused too on the image plane ? Moreover if the planar/collimated illumination focuses on the image plane, meaning the focale distance is the image plane distance, then how is it that the specimen is focused at the same point ??!! The specimen could not have an image if it's closer to the lens than the focal distance, and if it's further away then the image must be further away than the focal distance....
@mr702s4 жыл бұрын
@30:00 that is brightfield not darkfield. Was looking for Darkfield phase contrast content.
@josephoregan73854 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation. Thank you.
@mehulsharma52289 жыл бұрын
I didn't get it. what exactly was done/happened to the phase of the undiffracted light and how was it different in the earlier method without the circular disc ? Also, what purpose does converting the light rays into annular cones serve ?
@xianglu85839 жыл бұрын
+Mehul Sharma his understanding of the principle of phase contrast microscope is wrong....
@mehulsharma52289 жыл бұрын
Entirely or Partially ? could you help me out with a precise understanding of the principle ? Like explain it or give me a link that is more precise
@sallysassa10 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for this excellent information. I have an Olympus BX50 and have never known the complexities of the light delivery in my microscope... until today.
@Mystichandworks7 жыл бұрын
Great presentation. Thank you.
@Pettyorpretty6 жыл бұрын
is there any way to see lipids stained with a fluorescent dye Nile Red under phase contrast microscope? Plz tell if anyone knows because I don't have fluorescent microscope