Things I learned from this talk: - microservice ops requires a lot of good quality tooling - adoption of microservices requires big/gradual change towards teams fully responsible for their own services - must do destructive testing in production env to really understand resilience of system
@Calphool2227 жыл бұрын
Your second point has been there since the beginning of the DevOps trend started. "You build it, you run it." was a quote from Werner Vogels of Amazon, and Jezz Humble has repeated it often. For some reason, the world focused on CI/CD pipelines as the most important idea, but arguably the most important idea of DevOps is "you build it, you run it."
@reneetsielepi1608 жыл бұрын
Very useful insights and lessons learned, too often case studies show just how quick and easy it is which makes you think you're taking too long. Very honest and reassuring! Thank you.
@andreadiotallevi57802 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation!
@guddurajakharshitachoudhar66136 жыл бұрын
I like their way of learning from nature and putting it to software development cycle. Great Stuff and Great evolutionary thought. It's sure nothing work for ever , it evolves and as per need , the architecture need to evolve, to do business.
@st2008nor8 жыл бұрын
Practical insights - thanks!
@sbylk996 жыл бұрын
From monolith to micro scervices, org change is the hardest part. Prove my intuition.
@techwithbasil2 жыл бұрын
This was quite informative. Very useful insights for implementing microservices
@robimytube7 жыл бұрын
Loved it a-z!
@vishalsh16244 жыл бұрын
Best talk !
@ChuckJHardy8 жыл бұрын
Great talk. Thank you
@JohnSmith-he5xg7 жыл бұрын
Sweet visualizations
@quarkorion4 жыл бұрын
Nice video, but a small correction at the time 30:41 / 48:33: (0.99^500) * 100 = 0.657% (not 0.0657% as shown)
@lionofjudah619678 жыл бұрын
Very insightful, thanks for posting!
@jacekostrowski70448 жыл бұрын
Great talk, very informative.
@bpfurtado7 жыл бұрын
I saw a talk with the CTO of Deutsche Bank regarding microservices and I really cannot find, was it on GOTO or is my memory mistaken?
@kalyanhr7 жыл бұрын
Very insightful!!
@BryanStetson7 жыл бұрын
Very informative! +1 for the Frank Underwood sticker on the speaker's laptop.
@chandrag25367 жыл бұрын
Great talk. Very insightful...
@vivekach16 жыл бұрын
Learned.. Thank You.. Awesome
@berkarslan8 жыл бұрын
Great video. One thing that confused my mind is that he stated that RDBMS in the previous infrastructure was single point of failure. Imo, as long as you don't replicate the data somewhere else (and sometimes even that's not enough) or cache the entire data storage, the data storage will always will be single point of failure. What did change in new architecture so that it's not single point of failure now?? If it's about each and every microservices can use it's own data storage principle, lets assume that's true. As long as you didn't abstract the environment these microservices work on, they most probably will use the same DB Servers, DB Engines etc. What then? As long as your db server is not lightweight (and I mean VERY lightweight), you cannot install a new db engine for each microservices (can you imagine installing 100 SQLServer instances..) What I mean is solving single point of failure in data storage aspect does not seem very suitable for me in real world. Theoretically possible though..
@jeepsyl7 жыл бұрын
Hi, They now use Cassandra (a noSQL DB engine), instead of a RDMBS... From my understanding, Casandra is, by design, a massively distributed and replicated database : docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/2.1/cassandra/architecture/architectureDataDistributeAbout_c.html => For instance, in the following 2014 blog post, they talk about 285 cluster nodes : techblog.netflix.com/2014/07/revisiting-1-million-writes-per-second.html Regarding single point of failure, that's the main différence with a traditionnal RDBMS. Cheers.
@Calphool2227 жыл бұрын
As soon as you allow yourself to adopt BASE principles rather than ACID principles, *lots* of things become possible for availability purposes in the back end.
@audi887 жыл бұрын
Great talk.
@sahild65848 жыл бұрын
excellent stuff
@neskola8 жыл бұрын
Mesmerizing in awesomeness. :)
@marwooj8 жыл бұрын
Hi, what is the software used to mix video and slides in this way that they are using on goto;?
@GOTO-8 жыл бұрын
We have an external video producer creating the videos for us. They are called GotFat: gotfat.dk
@giladbaruchian75225 жыл бұрын
How do you make each team independent of other teams? often one team needs to use other team's service
@BradleyWeston928 жыл бұрын
I need that t-shirt aha
@jamescarr998 жыл бұрын
Ha yeah me too!
@sahild65848 жыл бұрын
James Carr me too
@crashpointXzero7 жыл бұрын
Very insightful. Thanks for sharing your experience. especially the parts about org changes.
@awanbiru-ride7 жыл бұрын
Very true, most of failures happened during weekends. Lol
@Nicky4118 жыл бұрын
Good stuff.
@paulobarravieira14718 жыл бұрын
Sensacional!!!
@philadams92546 жыл бұрын
Why is the video so dark?
@tohopes8 жыл бұрын
I like this
@LuisRuizHalo4 жыл бұрын
19:20 is key
@chihabahmed52077 жыл бұрын
Hi there, if i multiple services that they work independently ( will they still be called microservice)?
@kls81167 жыл бұрын
43:22 architecting is not a single-person function. its a culture.
@redbenus8 жыл бұрын
Triggering failures. Like fire drills with real fire. IT beating its old analogy of construction/building ...
@tr2336 жыл бұрын
Microservices are crazy, but if the salary good, you just dont give a dam.
@min11benja7 жыл бұрын
2:31 over 500? pff come back to the talk when its over 9000 =P