This is one of the most valuable software-engineering-related talks I've ever watched. I'm grateful that we live in a time where companies are open about their org and code architecture/practices. Thank you, Kevin, Spotify, and "go;to" Conference! It would also be interesting to hear from an actual engineer from Spotify (who's in the trenches writing code). "10 services per squad" sounds like a lot of context switching for a single employee. 😅 Some key points from this talk: 9:38 - I loved this illustration of the vertical teams. 11:10 - key slide. 25:10 - another key slide. 26:56 - I didn't fully understand this slide, but it was interesting to see. Seems complex though (for a team of 6 devs). 31:06 - Those were some really good questions from the audience and insightful answers from Kevin!
@Akhil24817 жыл бұрын
Awesome...spotify videos are the best...the one (in two parts) on Agile, Squads, Chapters, Guilds is my all time fav on KZbin...
@joachimdietl67375 жыл бұрын
If i had 600 developers i would do microservices as well
@KaGeN1027 жыл бұрын
Spotify has a Bieber service hahahaha
@Eliecerhdz8 жыл бұрын
Was the system page where services are listed using a Dota2 icon?? ;). Ez presentation BTW! I really loved it, because IMO you learn more about something like microservices based on showcases of enterprises you know and use, like Spotify, and yes they are very active with Open Source projects and giving feedback to the world about the technology they use. Great enterprise, great product and all works using microservices.
@ThePeterHayman7 жыл бұрын
I was joyed to see the view aggregation. I wondered if you used a specification language (in the VA) for building UI capabilities?
@the.abhisheksinha2 жыл бұрын
nicely explained !!
@remexllee8 жыл бұрын
Great talk!
@vipulchowkekar92973 жыл бұрын
Very useful video for education 🤘🏻
@lukaslukac86808 жыл бұрын
Informative talk ;) Thx
@guedim19828 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Nice video.
@HialeahLiam2 жыл бұрын
Sorry but that German joke was the cutest thing ever
@cafecomjava8 жыл бұрын
Someone knows the lamp he is talking?
@ThePeterHayman7 жыл бұрын
i quickly thought LAMP stack
@wesleybercx26537 жыл бұрын
"AWOX StriimLight WiFi"
@milosstojanovic7477 жыл бұрын
21:52 Service Routes?
@ayushrawat48258 жыл бұрын
i like it, nice.. Thanks
@skeletalbassman10287 жыл бұрын
So much effort designing the system, but apparently no effort to come up with a consistent and clear naming policy?
@krezzie74206 жыл бұрын
I can't believe that managers allowed them to name services like "Ice-cream!"
@VictorMartinez-zf6dt5 жыл бұрын
what do you know? and why does it matter? I obviously works for them and they don't seem hindered by it.
@cerberuspandora5 жыл бұрын
guy looks like hasnt slept in months
4 жыл бұрын
Party hard!
@SiddharthKulkarniN8 жыл бұрын
Nice talk, but a bit disappointed that you use Java in Production. There are better choices.
@bluescrum8 жыл бұрын
+Siddharth Kulkarni Interesting. Especially from the scaling perspective: which ones?
@Fane898 жыл бұрын
+BLUE SCRUM Scala?
@bluescrum8 жыл бұрын
+Thomas Vodrazka Well, Scala is compiled to Java byte code running on JVM. So you agree that Java is a good solution?
@Fane898 жыл бұрын
+BLUE SCRUM Yeah, there a point of view matter. But regarding scaling perspective Scala does a great job.
@bluescrum8 жыл бұрын
We may have to differentiate between the platform (JEE) and the language (Java). The discussion about Scala vs. Java is about using the same platform, but a different language to create bytecode. So if you have a look at the "billions of servers and devices" Java as a platform is working on there's no alternative to me at the moment from the scaling perspective. That's no real limitation, because today we can chose the language to create bytecode for it. That makes the development more flexible without leaving the secure ground that exists for decades now. So if you like to program in PHP you can do this and use JEE as your scaling platform. And even better: everything can be deployed in pretty short time to a cloud environment.
@ranbirs29805 жыл бұрын
good talk but really really very bad delivery.guy is sounds so sleepish