F-16 vs. Su-34: Which Fighter Jet Dominates the Skies?

[@davidharrison512]

What a stupid video, the F16 is being used for air superiority and the SU 34 is a designated lightweight bomber.

[@TJSnej01]

Yes, but the SU 34 is very agile for its class. The Su 34 will loose in dogfights, but the most fights are bejond visual range. In this case the electronic warfare and the ability to avoiding incomming missles, are more important. And the missiles itself, too. o.

[@davidharrison512]

@@TJSnej01 yes but still a stupid video and a pointless comparison.

[@YoungOneYT]

What a stupid comment, the F16 has never been in a war, the SU 34 has.

[@davidharrison512]

@YoungOneYT never been in a war? It had been in numerous wars including Desert Storm u nugget.....

[@alexnderrrthewoke4479]

Still would beat f-16 ​@@TJSnej01

[@Baqkton]

Didn't Su 34 beat f16 on August while Gliding Kyiv? ofcourse combined with Patriot missiles😛

[@vincentorlando6767]

I think the F16 would win because its designed for air to air combat, SU34 is a bomber.

[@Monkey-ud8bw]

Only one of these aircraft is a fighter, so really can’t compare.

[@shanequeen5003]

Don't b stupid the su34 is an su30 with side by side seats any flanker would beat it

[@Monkey-ud8bw]

@@shanequeen5003 what’s the difference between the 30 & 34 other than the cockpit configuration?

[@shanequeen5003]

@@Monkey-ud8bw canards and more powerful engines put it this way the su34 is the counterpart to the F15 E

[@leight420]

@@Monkey-ud8bwSu34 is 10 tons heavier than the Su35 which is the fighter variant of the aircraft

[@dberry999666]

which one? The F16s were blown up on the runways, one did fly with Ukraine's only instructor, but Ukraine shot it down, Russia laughed its ass off - and the Oscar goes to the Su34

[@dengxaoping5031]

Apples to Oranges comparison

[@militaryknowledgetv]

What a ridiculous video- the F-16 is used for air superiority, while the Su-34 is specifically a lightweight bomber.

[@navinmesommonta2017]

With out AWACS guide to the target F 16 has no way to win

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

F16 carries poor weapons . The Aim120 range 160 kms speed Mach 1. The SU 34 R37. Range 400 kms. Speed Mach 6 Game over . What have the f16s done in Ukraine ..?

[@Ev24J]

You lost the comment when you said mach 6, please don't use the internet no more.

[@hardstyle8184]

ok Russian trump guy... F-16 would do circles around the heavy ass battle taxi su-34. And btw way Russian vatniks. aim 120 amraam goes mach 4... and the Mako goes at least mach 5+ (but the rest is classified). You can't even win against small countries.... You import American chips because you equipment is janky..

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

@@hardstyle8184 Aim 120 is supersonic (Mach 1 ) r37 hypersonic ( over Mach 5 ) with nearly three times the range Where has the f16 been tested against advanced air defence ? It hasn’t . Your claims are just your personal opinion not fact Russia now makes its own weapons grade chips . Your information is from 1990 America imports virtually everything enriched uranium ( from Russia ) Before sanctions rocket engines . The Ukraine war has shown which equipment is “ janky” . All that “ game Changing “ American equipment that changed nothing America should stick to fighting weak countries . Against the big boys it doesn’t match up

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

@@Ev24J I’ve rechecked Mach 6 it is . I know it’s hard for Americans to accept that other countries have much better weapons .

[@TJSnej01]

Electronic warfare, agility an tactics are playing a important role, too.

[@grantchang81976]

SU34 way better.

[@ИСТИАКМОРШЕД]

Fried water rice with ghee 😅

[@SunsetNova]

F16 easy

[@OverlordZephyros]

if the f-16 were a woman.. I would marry it

[@TrevorCrook-c1s]

@@OverlordZephyros You would divorce it once you got to know it . Nearly 500 class A accidents in its history. An old hag these days 😄😄

[@alexnderrrthewoke4479]

​@@TrevorCrook-c1sdamnn dhots fired 😂😂😂

[@muhammedtrawally9969]

Indeed You funny