What a stupid video, the F16 is being used for air superiority and the SU 34 is a designated lightweight bomber.
@TJSnej013 сағат бұрын
Yes, but the SU 34 is very agile for its class. The Su 34 will loose in dogfights, but the most fights are bejond visual range. In this case the electronic warfare and the ability to avoiding incomming missles, are more important. And the missiles itself, too. o.
@davidharrison5123 сағат бұрын
@@TJSnej01 yes but still a stupid video and a pointless comparison.
@YoungOneYT2 сағат бұрын
What a stupid comment, the F16 has never been in a war, the SU 34 has.
@davidharrison5122 сағат бұрын
@YoungOneYT never been in a war? It had been in numerous wars including Desert Storm u nugget.....
@alexnderrrthewoke44792 сағат бұрын
Still would beat f-16 @@TJSnej01
@Baqkton3 сағат бұрын
Didn't Su 34 beat f16 on August while Gliding Kyiv? ofcourse combined with Patriot missiles😛
@vincentorlando67673 сағат бұрын
I think the F16 would win because its designed for air to air combat, SU34 is a bomber.
@Monkey-ud8bw4 сағат бұрын
Only one of these aircraft is a fighter, so really can’t compare.
@shanequeen50033 сағат бұрын
Don't b stupid the su34 is an su30 with side by side seats any flanker would beat it
@Monkey-ud8bw3 сағат бұрын
@@shanequeen5003 what’s the difference between the 30 & 34 other than the cockpit configuration?
@shanequeen50033 сағат бұрын
@@Monkey-ud8bw canards and more powerful engines put it this way the su34 is the counterpart to the F15 E
@leight420Сағат бұрын
@@Monkey-ud8bwSu34 is 10 tons heavier than the Su35 which is the fighter variant of the aircraft
@dberry99966639 минут бұрын
which one? The F16s were blown up on the runways, one did fly with Ukraine's only instructor, but Ukraine shot it down, Russia laughed its ass off - and the Oscar goes to the Su34
@dengxaoping50313 сағат бұрын
Apples to Oranges comparison
@militaryknowledgetv51 минут бұрын
What a ridiculous video- the F-16 is used for air superiority, while the Su-34 is specifically a lightweight bomber.
@navinmesommonta2017Сағат бұрын
With out AWACS guide to the target F 16 has no way to win
@TrevorCrook-c1s4 сағат бұрын
F16 carries poor weapons . The Aim120 range 160 kms speed Mach 1. The SU 34 R37. Range 400 kms. Speed Mach 6 Game over . What have the f16s done in Ukraine ..?
@Ev24J4 сағат бұрын
You lost the comment when you said mach 6, please don't use the internet no more.
@hardstyle81844 сағат бұрын
ok Russian trump guy... F-16 would do circles around the heavy ass battle taxi su-34. And btw way Russian vatniks. aim 120 amraam goes mach 4... and the Mako goes at least mach 5+ (but the rest is classified). You can't even win against small countries.... You import American chips because you equipment is janky..
@TrevorCrook-c1s3 сағат бұрын
@@hardstyle8184 Aim 120 is supersonic (Mach 1 ) r37 hypersonic ( over Mach 5 ) with nearly three times the range Where has the f16 been tested against advanced air defence ? It hasn’t . Your claims are just your personal opinion not fact Russia now makes its own weapons grade chips . Your information is from 1990 America imports virtually everything enriched uranium ( from Russia ) Before sanctions rocket engines . The Ukraine war has shown which equipment is “ janky” . All that “ game Changing “ American equipment that changed nothing America should stick to fighting weak countries . Against the big boys it doesn’t match up
@TrevorCrook-c1s3 сағат бұрын
@@Ev24J I’ve rechecked Mach 6 it is . I know it’s hard for Americans to accept that other countries have much better weapons .
@TJSnej013 сағат бұрын
Electronic warfare, agility an tactics are playing a important role, too.
@grantchang81976Сағат бұрын
SU34 way better.
@ИСТИАКМОРШЕД2 сағат бұрын
Fried water rice with ghee 😅
@SunsetNova30 минут бұрын
F16 easy
@OverlordZephyros3 сағат бұрын
if the f-16 were a woman.. I would marry it
@TrevorCrook-c1s3 сағат бұрын
@@OverlordZephyros You would divorce it once you got to know it . Nearly 500 class A accidents in its history. An old hag these days 😄😄