As am I. CVN 79 should have been ENTERPRISE, instead of being named after a womanizer who lost his own command due to negligence. CVN65 crewmember, 1981-1984.
@johnjones535414 сағат бұрын
@@thalmoragent9344 Really? PT 109 doesn't ring a bell?
@saneha-SanКүн бұрын
worthless video just for sake of making it nothing any new information 😢😢😢
@armleuchter4660Күн бұрын
Zwei Kinshal und der Kutter liegt auf dem Grund.
@jamieharmer5654Күн бұрын
The wine bottle didn't break the first time.....oh ....Oooooh
@Sandhill198812 сағат бұрын
It's champagne.
@jamieharmer56548 сағат бұрын
@@Sandhill1988 ...its bad luck if bottle dont break 1st time ?
@allgood67603 сағат бұрын
Awesome 👍
@dennisleighton281221 сағат бұрын
In other words, it's practically identical to the Ford! Just tarted up here and there with fix-ups for defects found on the Ford!
@luluapple106717 сағат бұрын
That big target for Chinese missiles
@DavidPreece-uv1jh12 сағат бұрын
Come to NZ , it would great to see
@stevetaylor82988 сағат бұрын
The obsession with the word 'platform' when talking about military stuff, drives me crazy. ... It's a ship.
@ronnyb94164 сағат бұрын
This is the greatest threat to the American taxpayer since the the Gerald Ford CVN78.
@fw14217 сағат бұрын
So the electromagnetic launch system can launch fully fueled and weapon loaded fighters?
@PlaneBoyRadarКүн бұрын
China watching this
@chamithathukorala1985Күн бұрын
😂 they will have better toys
@dannylally912Күн бұрын
They can watch all they want. They still can’t get any of their copies to work right or know how to operate it lol
@judefernandez827Күн бұрын
And shitting in their pants 😂😂😂😂
@judefernandez827Күн бұрын
@@chamithathukorala1985very poor quality toys😂😂😂😂
@ВивсівідстійКүн бұрын
@@chamithathukorala1985 They build ships, tanks, planes and guns using all that cheap Chinese steel produced in backyard furnaces during Mao’s Great Leap Forward.
@stevegray47348 сағат бұрын
Does Drone warfare make these vulnerable and possibly obselete?
@tammytaylor2472Күн бұрын
what the hell happened to this channel no current info
@davestevens419310 сағат бұрын
10 Nimitz class are virtually the same. The Ford is still getting the bugs worked out. Not a great video.
@AHURKYКүн бұрын
What kind of UAV is that on the deck? @4.54
@ChristIsKing4ever-l9wКүн бұрын
X-47b
@tonyyamauchi7281Күн бұрын
IF THIS IS THE BEST AIRCRAFT CARRIER WHAT HAPPENED TO GERALD FORD? No. 2?
@joe-yy2bqКүн бұрын
the ford is on deployment. the jfk is going to the pacific theater and had more upgrades and improvements over the ford
@josephnason877011 сағат бұрын
We'll hear about the JFK soon enough without clicking on AI videos by push button KZbin producers like this one. Click off immediately.
@ВивсівідстійКүн бұрын
Britain watching with envy because they’re lacking the financial and technological wherewithal to build such a ship.
@TFXJac19 сағат бұрын
Look at those primitive propellers! Yet another Grandpa Class Carrier I suppose.
@picandvideoКүн бұрын
Good space to help sheltering the homeless.
@randywarren7101Күн бұрын
The way I determine the best is by its history. By that cryteria, there is only one: CV-6U.S.S.Enterprise with 12 battlestars, the most decorated aircraft carrier in World War 2! Built before the war started, it was in almost all major battles in the Pacific untilbattle damage forced it out of service just before the war ended!
@uplink55 сағат бұрын
USS Enterprise (CV-6) had 20 Battlestars...:/
@bigtoad45Күн бұрын
Having served on an aircraft carrier (CV-41) I can tell you that in all honesty the aircraft carriers in today's battlefield are nothing more than big fat floating targets.
@rickjames18Күн бұрын
Right, everyone that can is building or wanting to build carriers which makes me think why countries would spend billions on such "obsolete" fat floating targets. I mean, sorry but that is a laughable take. A carrier doesn't just float around by itself without defenses waiting to be hit.
@higherpower7176Күн бұрын
@@rickjames18it’s been said sinking one of these is next to impossible. All the clever designs to keep water from flooding it, all the defensive measures surrounding each carrier. They really are incredibly impressive
@rickjames18Күн бұрын
@@higherpower7176 I agree with you which is why I laugh at people who claim carriers are all the sudden obsolete because "hypersonic" missiles are now a credible threat. I don't think people realize how protected carriers are or how hard they are to sink. Experts around the world can't be wrong and this internet "expert" right.
@clementgoetke238520 сағат бұрын
i bet your the life of the party
@uplink55 сағат бұрын
@@rickjames18 Dont anyone believe all the hype. (pun intended) Hypersonic missles can go extremely fast and hit ships, but they cannot do them both at the same time. They can be either hypersonic or low observable but, not in tandem. Traveling at hypersonic speeds creates a plasma layer that blocks radar signals. They have to slow down to track moving ships which makes them vulnerable. They are also highly observable... They are quite dangerous but moreso to stationary targets. Mobile targets are sill threatened but there are limitations.
@whitefalcon630Күн бұрын
target
@roddychristodoulou9111Күн бұрын
What a waste of time and money , aircraft carriers of today are nothing but slow moving targets for modern missiles .
@VandenorКүн бұрын
Well sadly it’s either take that risk or have no where to deploy or re fuel your jets :/
@gregowens61657 сағат бұрын
Would you replace it with anything? If not, why not?
@rochus_wagnerКүн бұрын
I don't believe America is capable of building a Aircraft Carrier decorated with such a (Super) adjective. Technologically, we are far behind our enemies, our weaponry is weak and outdated, we are constantly being humiliated in the eyes of the world, and this floating piece of iron won't help with that.😴🥱
@82maddhatterКүн бұрын
Far behind who ?? The Russians ?? The Chinese ?? give me a break….all they make is junk…sheesh
@rickjames18Күн бұрын
Right, except for some odd reason almost all experts would be laughing at such a comment. The evidence is also clear, US weapons are taking almost half of the global arms deals because experts from across the world agree US weapons are the best. Russia weapons have lost huge profits because those same experts and countries no longer trust Russian trash. At least not like they did before the war in Ukraine made it obvious western weapons were far far better. Just look at the decline in Russian weapons sales across the board. Anyone with half a brain will just laugh at such a comment. No amount of cope will change this.
@dylanogden81221 сағат бұрын
🇪🇺🇺🇲🇪🇺🇺🇲🇪🇺🇺🇲🗽🗽🗽💪💪💪I wanna know whos really wants that SMOKE FROM us and 31 other allies that r the best top European countries anyways This person is either a stupid troll trying to be a piece of shit purposely putting misinformation out there or really just bullshit lies with no real facts to back it up or they aren't from here or a allied country and r mad at the US cuz their country sucks
@vanroeling293019 сағат бұрын
@@rickjames18 kudos for your reply to an obvious Russian troll 👿