*I am so addicted to light. It's like I can't even see without it.*
@phonso69045 жыл бұрын
Same
@taniyagautam47805 жыл бұрын
Everyone is addicted ☺☺☺
@johnrubensaragi41255 жыл бұрын
No one gets the joke
@erikasl.70505 жыл бұрын
I would say its a good joke but nah, addicted needs to be replaced with other word bcs thats like "im so addicted to my legs. Its like i cant even walk without em"...
@skullcrawler185 жыл бұрын
Joke of the decade
@j.olazaran38685 жыл бұрын
*When you realize this was **-7 years ago 8 years ago 9 years ago 10 years ago 11 years ago 12 years ago-** 13 years ago*
@mvl715 жыл бұрын
Yeah, they need to make another video. Light is much faster now.
@Mello.5 жыл бұрын
Turrebo I have never face palmed so hard in my life. I think I’m in love
@РоманКоролев-ъ1ц5 жыл бұрын
Suka blyat' you God damn right
@IosifStalinsendsyoutoGulag5 жыл бұрын
@@mvl71 Damn constant updates... when does this beta testing end?
@hackereports11285 жыл бұрын
@@Mello. u know that he's kidding... right???
@adinansulley86185 жыл бұрын
I'll pretend I understood everything
@gurleenkahlon72565 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@Email55074 жыл бұрын
@@abhishekchaturvedi6348 He is understand idiot
@abhishekchaturvedi63484 жыл бұрын
@@Email5507but u did'nt understand my comment....now who's idiot?? Like my comment because it took me half an hour to understand your english
@nathanielluke20844 жыл бұрын
@@abhishekchaturvedi6348 yes, he are have stupid. Your comment I understand can 30 minutes less. Woo hoo!🎉
@abhishekchaturvedi63484 жыл бұрын
@@nathanielluke2084 yeah bro😂😂
@millennial_weeb23824 жыл бұрын
1:47 *Really, nobody did a timestamp I had to?*
@bhavyanayak43424 жыл бұрын
Lol
@ricardokessler4 жыл бұрын
You need more likes people need to know about this
@renee86694 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@del_15234 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@a_man78183 жыл бұрын
No, we only care about that white guy has an indian accent 🗿, thx u btw 😀
@fatelvis69244 жыл бұрын
These are the people who like studying maths on Sundays
@DieselpunkMachine4 жыл бұрын
I am too, bro!
@SHADOW-ol4xd4 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@zabbb_054 жыл бұрын
I watch on sunday
@vindhya84984 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@sachinz41994 жыл бұрын
Instead, they should study quantum physics.
@Prod-Zar5 жыл бұрын
When a car drives by my bed room window late at night
@sakshamsood74805 жыл бұрын
Zepar right!
@bananaman75375 жыл бұрын
@Jerry Gonzales Wtf...
@farooq8fox5 жыл бұрын
@Jerry Gonzales Bruh
@bassinburban89284 жыл бұрын
@Jerry Gonzales well damn. That escalated quickly
@itsgenti89104 жыл бұрын
@Jerry Gonzales shit went from 0 to 100 real quick
@reefleaf73265 жыл бұрын
one trillion frames per second. *me: watches in 2x*
@kurumi3945 жыл бұрын
MIT: *Wait. That's illegal.*
@timchaoskiller5 жыл бұрын
S T O N K S
@drugofsweetness5 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@RoYal-xz5ch5 жыл бұрын
Watches in 0.25× it's 4 trillion 😱
@ak3t0n5 жыл бұрын
@@RoYal-xz5ch FBI: stay right where you are
@drmushtaqahmadmalik44174 жыл бұрын
After 8 years, KZbin finally found me worthy to give this recommendation!!
@MaryMerryKingOfTheWoodsIsHe8 ай бұрын
Took me 12 years.
@VENOMYT57 ай бұрын
Yeah. 12 years for me too
@DiabloGato102 күн бұрын
13 years 🙃
@alexandersemundset77254 жыл бұрын
Films for 0.1 second "Aight, we're out of memory!"
@skwozies30834 жыл бұрын
0.1 seconds would probably take years to watch. We are talking about 7 times around the earth per second (the speed of light). So if we can imagine the speed through the digitally replaced soda bottle and going that speed almost around the circumference of the globe, it would prob take us years to watch said video. You could work out the math if you wanted to.
@lawganime93114 жыл бұрын
@@skwozies3083 you’re damn right that will be 30 000 000 m see at a speed of around .1 meter second so it will take 300 000 000 s to watch(close to 10 years)
@AmidaNyorai484 жыл бұрын
Lol
@priyaj52834 жыл бұрын
@@lawganime9311 I'm just gonna agree with you .. 👍
@Alaska-mk4ok3 жыл бұрын
lol
@Cauchypotatoes8 жыл бұрын
So I had a random thought of googling if someone had filmed light travel and found this video. A video uploaded 5 years ago. That's absolutely amazing.
@trevionwiggins1338 жыл бұрын
Same
@wigbe.22078 жыл бұрын
same
@Koutsn_8 жыл бұрын
That is not filming at the speed of light, it simply has multiple lenses (I believe 1 per pixel) so you can move the image around and focus it on the go in specialized software
@Mistabanned7 жыл бұрын
Did you know that they have managed to "freeze" light for moments?
@JimCim787 жыл бұрын
like with "the force"?
@Stay___Strong6 жыл бұрын
When the white guy started speaking, I thought he was imitating the Indian guy’s accent.
@fastcurious80815 жыл бұрын
His name is Ramesh Rasker. He is Indian and working as Associate professor in MIT Media Lab. Many Indians working in MIT, NASA, etc.
@master_Blaster915 жыл бұрын
Lee Thasi not really it's people who believe that a white man doing an accent of a different race is racist that need to check themselves
@lethai26705 жыл бұрын
@@master_Blaster91 oh yeah i forgot i misread it
@robinhyperlord90535 жыл бұрын
@@Icewind007 The SJWs are justified. Grow up.
@jimf19645 жыл бұрын
The only way they would let him in the project is if he was Indian.
@Robinov982 жыл бұрын
It is honestly pretty cool how we have come this far in technology
@victorpapillon14872 жыл бұрын
This is 11 years old, imaginr what they are witholding today.
@VoidHalo2 жыл бұрын
I agree, wholeheartedly. I also very much respect your insight into how amazing things like this are. Too many people brush it off saying "well that's not useful." But people did that with computers for almost a century or more. There are just some cases where the technology is so advanced, we can't even imagine uses for it. And there are tons of examples in history of technologies that were overlooked because they were ahead of their time. Or people. Like Ramanujan. He was a poor Indian fellow who was a brilliant mathematician, but being poor he didn't have a formal education and as a result of those two factors, nobody took him seriously for a long time. His work went over the heads of many of his peers, so having no academic credentials, they just brushed him off. Meanwhile he wound up being this insanely brilliant kid. It's kind of sad and makes you wonder how many other scientific geniuses have been overlooked like that over the years.
@huyup123456 Жыл бұрын
And I'm still sticking suppositories up my arse just for the hell of it.
@ninnellovrik Жыл бұрын
Yet In morality we have regressed to pre-ceramics
@patdohrety2940 Жыл бұрын
What you meant to say was "How only the Americans are capable of building this technology." Every other wannabe society steals our technology
@jasonenc40938 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see this used to visualize the delay of movement when looking at a mirror/reflection.
@friedchicken18 жыл бұрын
you would get no delay
@RiddimDubstep7 жыл бұрын
No, you would.
@lonewalker54467 жыл бұрын
I don't know. But i wonder how human brain create an image from the light waves coming from different directions.
@squidwardo70747 жыл бұрын
Arvaci That would be awesome.
@Wegster647 жыл бұрын
Great idea !
@kikodimov8806 жыл бұрын
So what you've actually filmed whas the refresh rate of the universe :D
@DrShikura6 жыл бұрын
Quantum theory suggests that light moves at the speed of causality, or to put it broadly, the speed of time. The speed of light may be constant, but only from the perspective of the observer. Light moves at about 300,000km/s to the observer. If time dilation occurs due to a strong gravitational wave, the 300,000km/s isn't what changes. The length of that second is what changes. Even an outside observer, affected differently by time dilation, would see this 1 second pass either more quickly or slowly than the inside observer. Nonetheless, once both observers observe 1 second having passed (which could happen at different "times"), to them, the photon will have traveled roughly 300,000km.
@Leonardo-G6 жыл бұрын
Itami Shikura Speed of time doesn’t make any sense. If speed is distance/time, then how do you square time so that you get the distance?
@DrShikura6 жыл бұрын
@@Leonardo-G well, the initial subject of the comments was refresh rates. Refresh rates are also a measurement of speed. You might say that a processor with a higher refresh rate than another would be "faster." That does not necessarily mean that the processor is traveling through space. If light can only move at 300,000 kilometers per second in a vacuum and we know that nothing else can move any faster in the observable universe, does that not have implications on how quickly events can transition from one to the other? This unseen constant would theoretically be the refresh rate of the hypothetical processor that simulates our universe?
@oumuamua70296 жыл бұрын
No,I think it's Planck time (5.391...× 10⁻ ⁴⁴second)
@shingamba5 жыл бұрын
The universe is moving faster than light. So no.
@fruitfarmfactory79016 жыл бұрын
_"one trillion frames per second"_ PC Master Race!
@pilgrimlarry6 жыл бұрын
Fruit Farm Factory lololololololol Nice!
@dj.avian.madrid6 жыл бұрын
Yeaaa pc master race rules
@broogz6 жыл бұрын
If you have a 144hz monitor you can only see up to 144fps. LET'S INVENT A TRILLION Hz DISPLAY
@forti82096 жыл бұрын
Lol my PS1 had that
@derLenno6 жыл бұрын
Unlimited power
@Rationalific4 жыл бұрын
It's about 9 years later, and this is still amazing. One of the biggest breakthroughs in imaging, similar to the first image of a black hole (released in 2019).
@danielarcher3692 жыл бұрын
no "black hole" was ever imaged, black holes do not exist
@Cicada37732 жыл бұрын
Black holes are still theoretical. The photo is of what they only belie e could maybe possibly be one.
@danielarcher3692 жыл бұрын
@@Cicada3773 they are not really theoretical either, as it is based on false math and assumptions.
@Cicada37732 жыл бұрын
@@danielarcher369 Indeed. We need a more comprehensive theory of quantum gravity to even begin to suggest the formation of black holes, let alone their event horizon or singularity.
@danielarcher3692 жыл бұрын
@@Cicada3773 physical gravity is solved by Miles Mathis, it is the binding energy of matter as all matter recycles photons.
@itanmayi4 жыл бұрын
When your lab mate so indian, you develop his accent
@kuruptzZz4 жыл бұрын
Huh? He sounds european, german maybe
@itanmayi4 жыл бұрын
@@kuruptzZz Exactly, indians try so hard to develop their english accent for scams, they almost forgot their own accent sometimes... lol p.s. i`m also an indian and it was joke so dont abuse me later
@कश्परैना4 жыл бұрын
@@itanmayi 😂😂
@ViratKohli-jj3wj4 жыл бұрын
@@itanmayi I hate indians tbh
@menakadias42874 жыл бұрын
@@itanmayi No, the Indian accent sticks with them even when they try to change it
@huaynaX5 жыл бұрын
*Video just shows the speed of light* Comments: why is the white guy sounding like a indian
@PSP-lr7ms4 жыл бұрын
Because not all indians have brown skin, india have many climatic conditions which give different colors and other distinctive features
@User-jr7vf4 жыл бұрын
Because he works with Indians and that makes him also speak like them.
@PSP-lr7ms4 жыл бұрын
@Nhilistic Komrad nice joke komrad😂
@Piyush86814 жыл бұрын
So sounding indian is a bad thing or a funny thing according to you🤨🤨
@donebro44034 жыл бұрын
@Nhilistic Komrad your voice is not a bad thing for me..judging people by their voices,imagine scientists make judgement according to what they see..... Destruction!!!
@vatsalgandhi50894 жыл бұрын
1:47 to 1:56 fun fact: if this was a footage of a 1500m/s (avg.) bullet, then it would have taken more than 23 years to completely cross the bottle.
@solcoster81104 жыл бұрын
thats insane
@CookieeMonstarr6664 жыл бұрын
I don't get it
@p1xel8704 жыл бұрын
CookieeMonstarr666 What is there not to get?
@gamingfiredrago4 жыл бұрын
@@CookieeMonstarr666 He's saying that light is so fast that even in this slowed down footage, it took so little time to cross the bottle. Had it been a bullet(of avg speed 1500m/s), the slowed down footage would've been 23 years long(for the bullet to cross the bottle)
@CookieeMonstarr6664 жыл бұрын
@@gamingfiredrago oh i get it now. Had a lil misunderstanding. Thanks for explaining.
@ramasharma33994 жыл бұрын
For class 12th students 2:18 this is what a wavefront is.
@arneshpal77028 ай бұрын
no
@Indian_Rajput8 ай бұрын
Wave fronts expands in all directions
@shreesha36388 ай бұрын
Hehe yeH
@AbyssmEdits8 ай бұрын
Did you even pass the 12th grade? That's not what a wave front is 🤡
@swayam52165 жыл бұрын
The camera is gonna run out of storage faster than speed of light!!!
@jaboibrodie16874 жыл бұрын
@We're Lost try 186,000 miles/second
@thanoscube85734 жыл бұрын
I hope they don't make a black hole
@yingxiawei8214 жыл бұрын
@I smell the cheeses in my future it will run out of storage at 666,420,069
@jdraptor64394 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂savage
@borispankov6384 жыл бұрын
@@jdraptor6439 so this is lie?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
Spectacular!!!
@letsmakeit97106 жыл бұрын
Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. How it possible , because we see only with the help of light photon but when actually photon are slow motion then how can we see any picture or shot because already light are slow down hence time traveling of light also slow down If you have any idea please explain me -Question from indian
@woowooNeedsFaith6 жыл бұрын
+let's make it You don't make any sense whatsoever. You ask somebody to make sense of YOUR misunderstanding of the whole thing, and of course that can't be done. How this "virtual camera" works, is explained at 0:26 - 0:42. There is no slowed down light involved.
@alisoltani24256 жыл бұрын
Oh Walter Lewin is here🤗
@spoonkey6 жыл бұрын
Spiderman
@davidhatcher70165 жыл бұрын
Yea
@theboss96005 жыл бұрын
one trillion frames per second *Me : watches 0.25x*
@trannynanny54404 жыл бұрын
Damn underrated
@Mr.Tom_694 жыл бұрын
😏
@cybervillager4 жыл бұрын
i.e 4 trillions per second 😂
@Itsshaunbewarned4 жыл бұрын
If you wooosh or call me a nerd or say a joke flew over my head then ur an idiot loser, It doesn't work because 0.25x speed just show individual frames slower, In order to get true slow-motion u have to get another slow-motion camera and record this YT video
@CyberSage7964 жыл бұрын
@@Itsshaunbewarned delete the first sentence and your comment will be funny. People who don't understand the sarcasm can fuck themselves, and so do you
@Daniel-dg8hd4 жыл бұрын
these are the type of people that cry when they get 98% on a test
@HueHanaejistla4 жыл бұрын
Daniel • why aren’t you
@Daniel-dg8hd4 жыл бұрын
@@HueHanaejistla Why am I not what? grades dont matter for what I'm doing , if thats what your talking about
@HueHanaejistla4 жыл бұрын
@@Daniel-dg8hd why don't you cry when you get a 98%? if you would have gotten a 100% you would get scholarships and avoid thousands of dollars of debt. i would cry if i got a 98% or below, which is most of the time, cause that means no scholarship for me :((((((
@Daniel-dg8hd4 жыл бұрын
@@HueHanaejistla i didnt go to college. dont go to college so you dont need scholarships and you won’t get into debt and will earn more
@HueHanaejistla4 жыл бұрын
@@Daniel-dg8hd no college no job
@adampizzi88708 жыл бұрын
By the time you see any light in the movie with the coke bottle the light beam has completely passed through the bottle and is out of the shot. What you are actually seeing is the light that bounced off the coke bottle and ended up inside the camera's lens. The camera can only record light which comes in contact with it's sensors. So if you think about it you are not exactly seeing how light propagates through an object. You are seeing how this scene directs light toward a lens overtime.
@RBZ06LT67 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Thats what i tought. People need to question theirselves a bit more!
@Synday7 жыл бұрын
Adam Pizzi hello captain obvious. seems like you passed elementary school! congratz
@DJxTriKz7 жыл бұрын
Synday Wow, you replied to a year old comment and tried to be a smartass. You came off as really cool on the internet. Good job.
@jmoa57587 жыл бұрын
Facepalm. Yes, but that is irrelevant as what was intended is achieved anyways.
@Stryker12977 жыл бұрын
Justin Moua not necessarily face-palm. Some people probably didn't get that. It's a pretty helpful comment
@AzWill028 жыл бұрын
50 years from now we will have 1Trillion fps phone cameras
@MelloSav8 жыл бұрын
Az Will lol That would be insane
@ElFly8 жыл бұрын
Az Will that would be useless on normal phones
@Dirty2628 жыл бұрын
Several years ago you would have said the same about a normal camera on a phone.
@AzWill028 жыл бұрын
true
@igidj72818 жыл бұрын
no you wouldn't
@nsb20217 жыл бұрын
You guys are smart enough to do this but not smart enough to take the label off the bottle for better observing
@piusminj45337 жыл бұрын
M0NSTERPR0 sponsoring
@ayushs60996 жыл бұрын
Chris Daldy-Rowe They must have asked you before doing the experiment
@chrisdaldy-rowe49786 жыл бұрын
If they had of asked you..they would have used plumbers tape lol
@ScientificReview6 жыл бұрын
Do you think they are lying?
@muhammadsafiullah516 жыл бұрын
M0NSTERPR0 Coca cola sponsored them
@OverlandOne9 ай бұрын
Last year, I built my own photon accelerator. It accelerates photons from 0 to the speed of light nearly instantaneously. Some people call it a flashlight, but I prefer the term photon accelerator.
@whitefeather83878 ай бұрын
Cool😮
@anonymousstacker20448 ай бұрын
still cool to be able to build your own flashlight my guy
@pulverizedpeanuts8 ай бұрын
photons don't accelerate they're always moving at the speed of light in a flashlight, particles are excited via electricity to release photons
@OverlandOne8 ай бұрын
@@pulverizedpeanuts Well, theoretically, there is no such thing as "instantaneous acceleration" so, once created there has to be some period of acceleration no matter how small. I was a physics major in college, although that was a long time ago but I have not read of any rewriting of any laws since graduation.
@pulverizedpeanuts8 ай бұрын
@@OverlandOne yes, but the comment i was replying to stated that the flashlight is accelerating photons so, in that context, i replied that they're always moving at the speed of light, which isn't false i said that they don't accelerate, not that they haven't ever accelerated
@hunterperformancepros8 жыл бұрын
how to move faster than light ... run in a dark room
@lotus94848 жыл бұрын
DAPPER DAN GAMING/ASMR sir... GJ
@hunterperformancepros8 жыл бұрын
golf clap
@camfg89087 жыл бұрын
Jajaja xaxaxa
@goldenfoxa18107 жыл бұрын
if the room is fully dark with no light in it then you're not faster than light because it's not there
@lonewalker54467 жыл бұрын
I can move faster than a light bulb
@TombRaider627184 жыл бұрын
2020: We are able to record light 2100: selfie with mr. Light
@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo4 жыл бұрын
*2012
@aaravgavshinde4 жыл бұрын
@@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo Seriously 2012?
@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo4 жыл бұрын
@@aaravgavshinde yeah look at the time this was uploaded
@aaravgavshinde4 жыл бұрын
@@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo You mean "2012" instead of "2020" ? Yeah, you are correct!
@palashneema48554 жыл бұрын
@@aaravgavshinde nope it’s 2011
@naminogiri5 жыл бұрын
Can you film the double slit experiment?
@Bibibosh5 жыл бұрын
naminogiri the double slit theory was a hoax to try and get people into quantum mechanics!
@RPTRxCrosshairs5 жыл бұрын
Source please?
@ynvch5 жыл бұрын
Filming a delayed choice quantum eraser would be nice too.
@johnkelly81355 жыл бұрын
LMAO!! Nicely said...
@bretmeeker32245 жыл бұрын
@@Bibibosh Please, please elaborate. You owe us all an explanation with that reckless statement lol. Not even saying you're wrong, I'm just curious
@kilroy9873 жыл бұрын
0:33 this is really cool. I'm guessing the light pulse is occurring from a pinpoint somewhere nearby where the arc would converge. But I wonder if there should be more of a deformation of the arc shape, since some surfaces are farther away from the camera, and it takes light that much longer to reach the camera.
@tjatsa2 жыл бұрын
Find a girl...
@laurenpinschannels Жыл бұрын
... Who shares your interests
@willmcclard206 Жыл бұрын
hm. i was wondering if we could use this to measure one way speed of light but now you’re making me think we cannot, by using this
@thomaspollock3917 жыл бұрын
we've had this for over 5 years and nobody is talking about the fact that we can take slow motion video of light? this is an incredible invention!
@th3smurf692 Жыл бұрын
But only in a Lab setup. Because the light has to be switched on and off, because the camera only captures a line and therefore only a source from a Controlled light can be used. Not to mention the Lab conditions
@nyclposter9 жыл бұрын
They should film the slit experiment......should be fun.
@squidwardo70747 жыл бұрын
nyclposter What is that?!
@notherNappaghost7 жыл бұрын
recording it would cause the probability waves to collapse back into matter. so what we would see would be a single linear movement path rather than the wave interference that its famous for.
@BlackMesaEmployee7 жыл бұрын
nyclposter 😱
@teovinokur93627 жыл бұрын
Yesss
@heron78697 жыл бұрын
nah wouldn't work
@thersten7 жыл бұрын
I learned advanced physics from reading KZbin comments. apparently that's where all the PhDs spend their time.
@realdeal57126 жыл бұрын
Lol no. Only uneducate idiot like u. 99% youtube comment are taught at highschool and many more are bs
@ansh63706 жыл бұрын
PhD? Pizza hut delivery?
@jmb90406 жыл бұрын
PhD is a Doctor of Philosophy
@gunnarolafur36916 жыл бұрын
JMB r/woooosh
@mhkuntug5 жыл бұрын
Painfully Howling Dog?
@celebrityrog Жыл бұрын
11 years later and nothing has come from this
@x_Shadow677 ай бұрын
What an utterly asinine comment. Large scientific breakthroughs take decades upon decades of collaborative research in a specific area. If you were in touch with this kind of thing at all you’d know that the Nobel prize in physics this past year was awarded to an even faster form of this exact kind of technology
@bollockjohnson61565 ай бұрын
@@x_Shadow67 don't be rude just because you like brown nosing smart people. They won't see your brownnosing comment and give you a scholarship you know lmao
@Zweebles5 ай бұрын
V-Ray, Unreal engine or practically any rendering software that came after this.
@danielkerr41003 күн бұрын
True
@imspartacusss4 жыл бұрын
They use one trillion fps but they show this on a simple coca cola bottle.
@mostpassiveuser89044 жыл бұрын
Yeah that's disappointing. Imagine a glass kaleidoscope there.
@ScientificReview4 жыл бұрын
Because this camera is sponsored by coca cola!
@mostpassiveuser89044 жыл бұрын
@@pravakarpal007 it's a presentation to generate excitement for the research.
@hars-bh4pl3 жыл бұрын
@@pravakarpal007 I'm just annoyed that they didn't peel off the sticker
@davidreed47133 жыл бұрын
I feel like they used something familiar so you could see the experiment with a familiar scale
@madmatmp7 жыл бұрын
The Slo Mo Guys will need one of these 😆
@Mrgranturismo4ever6 жыл бұрын
I bet there's only a handful of these
@pyroguyman0966 жыл бұрын
Honestly, what would they film with this that wouldn't just appear to be standing still?
@Dani-yd5mb6 жыл бұрын
Fck Yuu well if you watched the video, it's a few cameras that trigger at a specific time then all pieces put together. if you had good timing with a few phones, you can do it urself
@TheElvisnator6 жыл бұрын
100,000 $ - 10,000,000 $
@vaporii6 жыл бұрын
Holy crap no, they would be indestructible.
@krishnanshvyas69793 жыл бұрын
Dr. Ramesh Raskar sir is a Professor at MIT. I am Proud to be an indian.
@kyledilbert64248 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love how when a new achievement occurs ,everyone starts to rant about how it's fake and all
@tr-8r4178 жыл бұрын
I invented a carrot, that's slightly less orange, "FAKE! It's photoshop!"
@rochelimit555558 жыл бұрын
It's old, it's already around since 5 years ago, and yet this is the only video showing light in slow motion.
@GroovBird8 жыл бұрын
No, it's not. It's the only video that became popular. I did some googling, and I found the following page: www.mit.edu/~velten/press/content/
@rochelimit555558 жыл бұрын
***** Thanks for sharing Dave, but I know that page with the apple videos and the door video, and that is the same exact page I saw 5 years ago. In fact all of those videos are actually in one single lecture by the Indian-looking guy. which I heard exactly 5 years ago. I don't know why they haven't created any more of these in a 5 year gap, was the camera too expensive? was the camera broke? was it fake? not sure...
@GroovBird8 жыл бұрын
I don't think it was a specific type of camera. I think it was an experiment, like a one off. Reading the document, I'm also convinced that what we see in the videos is not "real" but is based on the information that is captured and then rendered. The whole thing is called "computational photography" too.
@RayNow6 жыл бұрын
Explanation: it's impossible to see a beam of light the same way we can see a bullet in slow motion. We can see a bullet only by catching the light it reflects, but a light beam will not reflect or emit light, it's completely invisible unless it gets directly to your sensor, and then it disappears. They try to make it look like the bright spot travelling in the coke bottle is the equivalent of the bullet travelling through the apple, but it is not: the moving bright spot is the reflection of a spherical light pulse emitted by the laser against the side of the bottle and back at the captors.
@atmbm52616 жыл бұрын
Nice one, you copied a one year old comment. Congrats
@user-ue3gx8nu1t6 жыл бұрын
you legit copy and pasted that
@Bevsworld046 жыл бұрын
RayNow soooo what you're saying is that we are seeing the paped of light?
@elmerynxat61875 жыл бұрын
Damed Ass..!! LOL
@Droe9667Pantera5 жыл бұрын
Light beams emit light lmao, how do you think we can see a Lazer pointer in the air even when it's not directly pointed in our eyes
@Mr33445556 жыл бұрын
When science reaches it's Epitome, they use coca cola plastic bottles to measure light.
@ARouser15 Жыл бұрын
You dont see the photon. You just see the physical representation of a photon.
@ericeaton23866 ай бұрын
Photons are literally the only thing you can see.
@ThisGuyDrives5 жыл бұрын
I’d like to know exactly what’s in KZbin’s algorithm that it thinks of me and says, “I got this video from over 7 years ago that you’re are going to LOVE!”
@mohitthorat85805 жыл бұрын
It could be that the people you follow or the people KZbin has clubbed you with like these sort of videos
@sirlyon33335 жыл бұрын
I mean, its better that they at least bring things back up from the catalogues than forget them for eternity
@Lambda_Ovine4 жыл бұрын
Well, did you like it?
@geli95us4 жыл бұрын
@@MyChannel-bh6sc yeah, I don't know why the age of the video should matter if you enjoyed it
@yahaaa13434 жыл бұрын
I know why it was recomended for it's sci content, i consume it reularly. But , why now and not earlier ? For me that's the whole point.
@nuclear88177 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: The multiple camera array technique they used to film this is the same technique that the US used in the 1950's to create extremely high speed, extremely high definition recordings of nuclear weapons tests. You should check it out. There's a video here on KZbin titled *"First milliseconds of nuclear bomb test."*
@IDMYM87 жыл бұрын
Nuclear ok i'll do that
@dsolis13527 жыл бұрын
Nuclear
@zakman2467 жыл бұрын
Nuclear
@mcbarnhart7 жыл бұрын
Not unless they exploded a bomb every trillionth of a second. Listen carefully- the laser is pulsed, and they shoot just one line of the video on each pulse. The video is a composite of partial pictures of a huge number of pulses
@ZerinZarinZerin7 жыл бұрын
Yes, you're right.
@web2767 жыл бұрын
A white guy with an Indian accent is more impressive than the light
@necron74367 жыл бұрын
I thought the white guy had a facewarp filter on in the middle.
@விஷ்ணு_கார்த்திக்7 жыл бұрын
PRETTY SURE He's brown
@anurag111127 жыл бұрын
He is an indian....
@raleiariel92717 жыл бұрын
web276 arabic "white" people aren't uncommon
@h.a.67907 жыл бұрын
My thoughts exactly... but I didn't see it as German when the Indian guy was talking. Notice both accents have trouble pronouncing the letter R.
@BhardwajAditya3 жыл бұрын
The thumbnail is showing a light effect. If I scroll up, the upper edge of the bottle gets a reddish colour and if I scroll down it seems that the thumbnail has become larger for a while (having a reddish colour at the edge).
@calciumfree96267 жыл бұрын
For lazy people 1:47
@duckpomegranate77107 жыл бұрын
CalciumFree 무칼슘우유 thx
@davidmoret51507 жыл бұрын
CalciumFree 무칼슘우유 thx my dude
@keenanmillard25347 жыл бұрын
CalciumFree 무칼슘우유 you a saviour
@ismaastro76616 жыл бұрын
Thanks dude
@marcell26386 жыл бұрын
You mean "impatient people"?
@AadarshRai25 жыл бұрын
Anyone thinking that Ramesh is from IIT is wrong . He received his undergraduate degree from College of engineering,Pune😁😅
@anuj88255 жыл бұрын
वाव । ... He must hv won some olympiad; that he got into MIT.
@FullMetalChains5 жыл бұрын
@@anuj8825 he is a teacher not a student. You don't have to win Olympiads to become a teacher
@ARNABROY-hz7re5 жыл бұрын
I m also in pune university , lol that doesn't mean that I will also go into MIT 😂
@AadarshRai25 жыл бұрын
@@ARNABROY-hz7re I didn't told it.I just cleared that he is not an IITian and he is a faculty member of MIT .
@rahulkalyan2675 жыл бұрын
How you know him
@mikesanders32465 жыл бұрын
Oh how Newton, Einstein and Huygen & Hooke would have loved to see this video.
@cringebob9655 жыл бұрын
And stephen hawking (R.I.P)
@marcioamaral75115 жыл бұрын
@@cringebob965 this is from 2011
@cringebob9655 жыл бұрын
Márcio Amaral Oh so he couldve seen this Hopefully he saw this before his death
@mostpassiveuser89044 жыл бұрын
They already have. That's how the speed of light is measured. Don't forget that what you're seeing here is the light that is diffracted by the air and reaches the camera. Depending on the distance between the camera and the bottle, the light you see in the image has already moved farther ahead.
@Nooo_Way15 күн бұрын
So if another camera were to be put infront of the bottle, that captures things at the same slow mo speed, would it see the light coming? or would it not see anything right until this moment 1:54 Since if it *saw* the light coming that means the photons moved faster than what was portrayed in the video
@kirjian4 жыл бұрын
The problem with being faster than light is that we only live in darkness.
@yashashviraj42513 жыл бұрын
Oof size: •small •medium •large✓
@rudrayanraha67093 жыл бұрын
Philosophy level × 1000
@Manideep65573 жыл бұрын
Oh
@improvingguitarist15953 жыл бұрын
Actually, being faster than light means you can see the light in front of you
@rudrayanraha67093 жыл бұрын
@@improvingguitarist1595 nope in back of you
@daiduongdaviddinh1404 жыл бұрын
I was expecting to see photons flying at slow mo. 😠
@knytlite4 жыл бұрын
You did
@VercilJuan4 жыл бұрын
You just did.
@knytlite4 жыл бұрын
@@VercilJuan I think maybe that was the joke lol. I'll just go ahead and r/wooosh myself out
@willsonjohn91794 жыл бұрын
Photons can't interact with photons 🙄
@mikemanthe4 жыл бұрын
willson john thank you! You cannot *see* photons. You can only see things that can effectively reflect light (photons). Photons are the source of ‘seeing’ - it a chicken and the egg thing...
@momentomoridaze64107 жыл бұрын
6 years later.. in my recamandad video .. wow KZbin..
@mahirahmed62827 жыл бұрын
Raj bizzle 5 years later* recommended*
@dorionrenwyn7 жыл бұрын
9snaker no one cares about the months
@fishgoblubablu7 жыл бұрын
Carnivoid *years
@dorionrenwyn7 жыл бұрын
Stingy, IT'S MINE no it's months because he means 5 years and something months even tho the years has a difference of 6 years he does care of the months
@dorionrenwyn7 жыл бұрын
Now it's completely six years
@chapterleo83513 жыл бұрын
These are the people who know the difference between physics and quantum physics !!
@Hawxxy6 жыл бұрын
This video was sponsored by Coca Cola.
@dimi39786 жыл бұрын
lmao
@shingamba5 жыл бұрын
This video had no Coca Cola written any where.
@mjames21175 жыл бұрын
Shit overpriced soft drink
@fadymilad4345 жыл бұрын
@@shingamba r/woooooosh
@johntu19675 жыл бұрын
And Apple
@neikoo77858 жыл бұрын
How many terabytes does 1sec take to capture
@neikoo77858 жыл бұрын
For them to capture it they will need to start the camera before the light and if that's the speed of light well then it will take up storage
@wooferjr1697 жыл бұрын
probably a few kilobytes or 2 megabytes
@RivenbladeS7 жыл бұрын
AllNamesRntAvailable i believe that 1 trillion fps is 1 trillion frames per sec. say an inage is 2mb. 1 trillion inages is 1 trillion × 2×1000. if the video is 0.0000001sec you just divide the previous with 10000000 or 10^7. so it would be 100.000.000×2 or 200 million bytes or 200 gb.correct me if im wrong
@wooferjr1697 жыл бұрын
rivenblades Yes you're wrong lol it'll be just a few megabytes.
@wmconorbrown7 жыл бұрын
1 trillion is a huge number. If you slowed 1 second of footagee down to 30 frames per second, it would take 1057 years to watch the whole second.
@grisha15285 жыл бұрын
I watched this at 0.5x speed for extra details
@TheRedRaph5 жыл бұрын
2 Trillion Frames per second.
@ralphpeteranderl40634 жыл бұрын
Yes, makes all the difference!
@algeria_online_fair4 жыл бұрын
And what's the result?
@priyaj52834 жыл бұрын
@@algeria_online_fair check it out yourself..
@Ydv_Saurabh264 жыл бұрын
You genius
@russianspy-3 күн бұрын
I watched the video about someone making a camera that could see light at a million FPS out of scrap talking about this video, and now this video popped up in my recommended.
@ThePieMan3057 жыл бұрын
I play Skyrim at 1 trillion fps
@anshpathania18167 жыл бұрын
ThePieMan what did you pc smoked?
@thecostarules6316 жыл бұрын
A trillion faps
@johnf.kennedy6 жыл бұрын
i play skyrim at 1 quadrillion fps
@labermichnichtzu80036 жыл бұрын
Yeah regarding skyrim: Bethesda has relaunched it a trillion times already.
@bster31686 жыл бұрын
I play fallout at 100000000000001
@colewilliams34376 жыл бұрын
At first glance i thought this was capturing light at actual light speed and there is alot of naive people in the comments who actually think that. What they're actually capturing is just light that is already there but being pointed into different directions...
@edwardlewis19634 жыл бұрын
Yeah it sounds to me that they are taking measurements, and using the current theory of light they are producing animations; the important question is whether they can create a device that is actually useful in terms of providing correct/accurate images
@sffkhlkldadsakdjalkdjas25236 жыл бұрын
Imagine getting 1,000,000,000,000 frames per second, but then remembering that your monitor is capped at 30hz...
@PavanSpace4 жыл бұрын
🙄
@maheshdarisa4 жыл бұрын
Most underrated comment.
@radioactivet-rex2864 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂gamer problems
@Shaaan4 жыл бұрын
Sad liyfe
@Dionisus972 жыл бұрын
I’ve clicked for the slow motion, but stayed for the explanation. Very fascinating.
@morning5tarr5 жыл бұрын
*Still faster than my internet explorer.*
@mysticdragonex8154 жыл бұрын
Me: *_laughs in Google Chrome_*
@kimjongun23834 жыл бұрын
@@mysticdragonex815 me: laughs in mobile data
@smoothinterceptor84524 жыл бұрын
Edge is the new king
@peacematters45576 жыл бұрын
Didnt they had anything else as test probe than coke bottle??
@willdavis72546 жыл бұрын
With a label, wtf?
@Anten-Isy6 жыл бұрын
@@willdavis7254 prolly sponsoring
@Mikehikegaming5 жыл бұрын
Merica
@rusemode5 жыл бұрын
You didn't see the apple at the end??
@TheKingOfHeartsIV7 жыл бұрын
1000 degree knife vs camera plz
@DaniaxII7 жыл бұрын
I thought you're already dead a long time ago
@jeevithjerry61796 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@Grazey6 жыл бұрын
Wrong channel bro
@toudertmenouar39438 ай бұрын
After 12 years, KZbin finally found me worthy to give this recommendation. 😅😅😅
@b-init12215 жыл бұрын
Turn on a light source and record at 3 trillion fps and play in slo Mo *AND SEE LIGHT WALKING*
@geobean40926 жыл бұрын
This method of viewing photons is truly amazing. Thank your MIT team for your great research; you make us humans proud.
@simon6071 Жыл бұрын
Capturing the flight path of photons is relatively easy. Capturing the flight path of a photon is hard if not impossible. With a huge number of photons, photons scattered by the medium can reveal the path of the light pulse. With only one photon, we simply cannot take pictures or videos to see its flight path because no photon is scattered sideways.
@bootup8565 жыл бұрын
It means if you take a 1 second video of 1 trillion fps. And then play it in a normal rate, ie 25fps, then you will have a 40 billion second video. ie a 666666666 minutes video. ie a 11111111 hours video
@luisfilipeandradepinho19654 жыл бұрын
This comment makes me try to think realistically : how many YEARS would be necessary for us to see ONE second at 1.000.000.000.000 fps with the most advanced technology that the common cityzen can use for ???? Let's put our heads ACTUALLY thinking before immediate believing in "amazing" statements. Because many of us are thirsty of the "amazing" - every thing has to be "amaziiinng" to reach the level of our satisfaction as "customers" of the net-"industry", nowadays ...!!! Einstein said that "we have to be SIMPLE as possible, but NOT SIMPLISTIC" at all"... Am I wrong ??? (Of course I may be wrong but, simply, THINK "with the feet on the groud and the head on the neck" instead of "head on the Moon", or a kind of exoplanet, & so on). Sorry for my unpleasant words. However, I feel I had to tell this Thank you very much.
@abidifoued4 жыл бұрын
You r right . Relativity say that no information can travel faster than light . Then what is this 1 trillion bullshit ???
@PYC13374 жыл бұрын
1:21 this guy's bald spot represents that time when scientists are forced to use 100% of their brain clock reaching "high temps".
@PYC13374 жыл бұрын
@Gaurav N i am glad you liked it)
@asmeet20053 жыл бұрын
Why it's soo underrated?!? THAT'S a Crime!
@improvingguitarist15953 жыл бұрын
They're overclocking their brain
@AspenEmrys10 жыл бұрын
so it's not truly capturing sequential frames? if i understand, it's creating a composite image, not of just a single event, but of the many many laser bursts. So, while *true* high-speed photography is still impressive and useful... to be CLEAR, this isn't the same thing as capturing the motion of a single event - but allows us to study the way light behaves *while it interacts* with matter. we can now make more accurate computer models, which of course, has endless applications... FUKKEN AMAZEBALLS
@AspenEmrys10 жыл бұрын
far closer to seeing how light acts as a particle, rather than a wave...
@freddyfredrickson10 жыл бұрын
You are right. It is capturing multiple identical events at pico second delayed interval captures. Because each pulse of laser light is identical, when the captured images are merged into a movie, it is for all accounts a perfect representation of a trillion fps camera. I think it is really neat.
@PaladinswordSaurfang10 жыл бұрын
Feddy Fredrickson But the effect of photography would collapse a wavefunction. So a single pulse of light might actually look different to many pulses because of this.
@freddyfredrickson10 жыл бұрын
PaladinswordSaurfang Why would the taking of a picture effect the wavefunction? I get that everything effects everything else on some level, but the taking of a picture is almost entirely passive unless the flash is on. The other effect that could be produced is the way it would scatter some indirect light from the pulse, but that would be true for any object in the room. However, the thing to remember is that the effect the camera or any other object would have would have on the waveform, would be uniform due to the fact the objects remained static in the room throughout the sequence of light pulses. Maybe I don't understand what you are saying. You do know these pulses aren't taking place in rapid succession, but instead over a relatively longer time. Meaning the preceding pulse 's waveform completely dissipates before the next waveform starts.
@WubbyPunch9 жыл бұрын
trefrog WOW! you understand! that's awesome :D. so many idiots on here dont believe the video because they dont understand how it works. MIT is a little to blame for whatever misconceptions people are having about this technically "composite video" , because of the way they misrepresent what the device actually does.
@navjotsingh14186 жыл бұрын
You should show the youngs double slit experiment or diffractions with these cameras. That would be more interesting than coca cola bottle.
@Kugrox5 жыл бұрын
i like to test a couple slits if you know what im sayin
@MrSonny61555 жыл бұрын
That wouldn't have worked. Photons need to bounce off something in order to reach your eyes in the first place. The only reason you can see the light in that video was because the laser pulse hit the back end of the bottle and became a wave front of disorganised photons bouncing in all directions. The group of photons that are actually still travelling straight is not visible. Young's interference experiments require the light sources to be coherent to get the interference to occur. Therefore there wouldn't be much to see if you tried to record it. For more information, the MIT video for K12 students has a video that highlights this key observation by Thomas Young. kzbin.info/www/bejne/eX-QqJ2glNWbjKMm
@farhanaditya26475 жыл бұрын
Someone has tried it, somehow the observation caused the photon to suddenly behave normally and doesn't create a double slit
@aamirsayeed32305 жыл бұрын
Farhan Aditya source?
@tannerwimer6 жыл бұрын
1:54 is the coolest part. Thank me laterz
@EdPaul-uc3ew4 жыл бұрын
If you tap it reapeatedly, it's *Medic* *Medic* *Medic* *Medic* .... . 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂
@janithsachintha3620 Жыл бұрын
And that’s ladies and gentleman is proper ray tracing 1:50
@aasitbanerjee19554 жыл бұрын
When you are in MIT but forgot to remove Coke Wrapper for experiment..
@paleesteem28363 жыл бұрын
Nice one
@wedding_photography8 жыл бұрын
This absolutely does not record at one trillion FPS. It does a very short exposure, which is the actual achievement. But it only takes a few frames per second, if not slower. It's a stop motion animation of how the light propagates.
@hammurabi47377 жыл бұрын
You will never, ever see "light travelling through objects", per se. It is only the photons that strike the camera CCD that will ever be seen. If you truly filmed at one trillion FPS, the result would be a lower-resolution, since the finite number of photons would not be averaging so well to produce a smooth picture. People here seem to think they will see a photon travelling through 3D space, and this is simply not the case.
@cortster127 жыл бұрын
That is the moronic people's fault. The scientists in the video clearly states how they did it and that it was a virtual method, not a literal one.
@kirjian7 жыл бұрын
per se
@dystm7557 жыл бұрын
Hammurabi Did you saw how big and advanced the camera they're using?
@PixlRainbow7 жыл бұрын
Hammurabi that's why they used one trillion individual micro-cameras in a giant metal box.
@infinitytraveller77727 жыл бұрын
Bose-Einstein ????? it's f reall
@xd_adventure_innovation Жыл бұрын
Can you guys please film the double slit experiment with a regular light source and also with a laser beam?
@hexagonmagnetics569 Жыл бұрын
The act of filming would alter the behavior!!!
@mjayy_4 жыл бұрын
2:04 ultrasound with light...woww.
@jonlanier_8 жыл бұрын
Let's face it. Someone will find a military use for it.
@MelloSav8 жыл бұрын
Jon Lanier I wouldn't be surprised if that is one of the main driving goals of the research
@TheUntamedNetwork8 жыл бұрын
It was, one of the primary goals of this device was to allow you to see around corners, by sending trillions of flashes of light at say a partially opened door, and seeing what light gets reflected back you can form an approximate image for whats inside the room
@nicoepsilon08 жыл бұрын
that's just typical MIT hype to get funding, do you imagine a SWAT team bring in an optical table, those giant femto-second laser, photon counters and mirrors. Then you have to say to the terrorists: ''can you please stay still for the next 4 hours so that we can start our measurements?''.
@accelerator55247 жыл бұрын
this scanning thing just works better with sound dont you think so?.
@Juliho209 жыл бұрын
can i do this with my xperia?
@theos1929 жыл бұрын
Hell no, u mad
@its_elkku1358 жыл бұрын
it was a joke
@mouth71377 жыл бұрын
Juliho20 xperia can only do 970 fps
@wasabi21037 жыл бұрын
Kush Beer Probably 2 years ago no one would have imagined that
@rrb2nd7 жыл бұрын
with multiple ones, yes. 1. find the number of sensors in the Xperia and calculate maximum fps. 2. calculate number of cameras required for capturing light by dividing speed of light by fps (taking into consideration the distance to sensor of course). 3. program the cameras to capture images at intervals that can account for the time gap between frames, thus ensuring that each frame is captured. 4. import the images to a computer (ensure you have enough memory -- can be calculated with ease as well). 5. string up the images in sequence (you can write a program for that) and correct for angle/distance of various cameras used. 6. watch video. cost accordingly. [alternatively, make your own camera with requisite number of sensors. won't be surprised if there is an instructible out there.]
@SonGoku-by3uy3 жыл бұрын
The light already reached the bottle cap when u saw it at once, as it will also cover the distance to reach the camera to get recorded.
@bwilson70005 жыл бұрын
How does the light get through the camera lense and faster than the light being filmed?
@NewLondonMarshall5 жыл бұрын
bwilson7000 exactly it’s bull 😂
@RRBuilder6115 жыл бұрын
By that reasoning, how can I see at all. The light takes time to reach me or the camera, but we still see it. It’s not like it’s magically jumping to the camera.
@bwilson70005 жыл бұрын
Virginian I’m not understanding cause camera is x distance away light being filmed is traveling perpendicular to camera lense. So light is going back and forth to camera lense faster than light being filmed?
@rjpx9475 жыл бұрын
@@NewLondonMarshall Gus the AntiScience Guy!
@NewLondonMarshall5 жыл бұрын
Richard P 😂😂 The photons have to hit the sensor before the camera can see them, so seeing the photons move across the plane makes no sense to me but I might be missing something!
@VanillaSnake2111 жыл бұрын
You can see the packet traveling as a wave and as one packet at the same time, this video belongs on the mindblow chanel
@infinitytraveller77727 жыл бұрын
VanillaSnake21 huh??? where are you seeing it? I see no such thing
@gypsygypsy_y6 жыл бұрын
Imagine playing your favorite games at 1 trillion fps
@SYTGaming-ue1bx6 жыл бұрын
Um, FPS means "frames per second". Saying "fps/s" means "frames per second per second". Just saying 😊
@mrEofPlanetEarth6 жыл бұрын
We hacktually, it would look exactly the same. Your eyes can only perceive at a certain speed.
@gypsygypsy_y6 жыл бұрын
@@mrEofPlanetEarth woah
@Ineedanaccountnow06 жыл бұрын
And it really depends on your moniter. On a 60Hz moniter, the maximum refresh rate is 60/s, so it'll look exactly like it was moving at 60 fps. Now the crazy thing to imagine is a 1 trillion Hz moniter. That would be nuts
@mrEofPlanetEarth6 жыл бұрын
Qwoto ...once again..you wouldn't notice a difference. The universe runs a few million times faster than one million FPS and to us, it seems like a smooth video.
@vaibhavhalankar58403 жыл бұрын
If we convert kilometers in cm like architectural scale. Small miniature version. We get size of earth 13 cm, sizrr of sun 6.96 meter. And distance between them is 1.5 km. And speed of sun light is infinity. Look at the scale below. Correct me if i m wrong. 1000 km= 1 cm . 10000km=10 cm. 13000km=13 cm. 15000km=15 cm. 100000km=100 cm (1meter). 200000km=200 cm (2meter). 696000km=696 cm (6.96 meter). 1000000km=1000 cm (10 meter). 10000000km (1 CR)=10000cm (100 meter). 100000000km (10cr)=100000cm (1km) 150000000km(15 cr)=150000cm(1.5 km)
@ilovet-series32645 жыл бұрын
The slow mo guys wants their camera back
@gittyupalice964 жыл бұрын
Light: I am the FASTEST in the universe! Camera: check out my 3 stage nitrous kit Light: need bigger turbos D:
@jochenstacker74484 жыл бұрын
Light would get a speeding ticket from Einstein if it did that.
@SamuelPearlman4 жыл бұрын
"titanium sapphire laser" - I think I might have just gotten too excited!
@RayRay-uw6ms Жыл бұрын
12 years later, still haven't found a use for it
@maksymalforov56057 жыл бұрын
Light travels 8 inches every 1 billionth of a second.
@nine9nevamine7 жыл бұрын
Wow.
@zeptune767 жыл бұрын
actually 11.8 inches in a nanosecond
@starlite51546 жыл бұрын
Oh,shit.
@louisbarbisan84716 жыл бұрын
Kevin Nolan Actually closer to 11.375"
@fusion676 жыл бұрын
and you are hear because?
@rupadarshisamanta32883 жыл бұрын
The explanation of that Indian professor is amazing. Awesome experiment
@MrAzam19918 жыл бұрын
İ did not understand the principle they used, mirror stage....and dumb face.
@ConnorEtch8 жыл бұрын
Watch the video with sound then...
@kcuhc848 жыл бұрын
They even included some smoke
@sofastealeroffensive3 жыл бұрын
Light is so epic if you start a rave without him the lights won’t work
@jjthelightskin41567 жыл бұрын
American/Indian accent is oddly satasfying
@buddyclem73286 жыл бұрын
James The Second Satisfying.
@Tracuer2216 жыл бұрын
It's more comical than it is satisfying
@moonlitbeau6 жыл бұрын
it's those retro-flex consonants
@cm51916 жыл бұрын
He has a German accent and he's German
@fatdoi0036 жыл бұрын
What?!? no aryan pure bred homeboy on this project??
@vishwajeetprasad17294 жыл бұрын
Now I understand why Derek said that it is measured the speed of light in a round trip. I was totally confused back then that we can measure the speed of light in one direction
@agerven5 жыл бұрын
Hahaaa, fascinating and interesting. Although, and rightly so, explained at a classical level. It is similar to synchronising a camera's frame-taking to the falling of individual droplets of water. Both are integration, or averaging if you will, of physical phenomena over time. So we are looking at the average of the light pulses traveling through a distance (similar as looking at the average of water drops at a given position), not at actual individual photons (or waterdrops). In this experiment and scale we don't see and will not see relativistic or quantum effects. Nonetheless chapeau for this MIT group and, as stated, it is a nice new way of studying optical effects.
@madhurasshetty98885 жыл бұрын
I'm 14 and I'm definitely sure that nobody who liked your comment got what you said but I did. Just saying.
@thelastoverlord75975 жыл бұрын
@@madhurasshetty9888 not that hard to get
@madhurasshetty98885 жыл бұрын
@@thelastoverlord7597 for you and me it might not be.but for all the dummies out there it is
@thranduilssugarbaby73254 жыл бұрын
@@madhurasshetty9888 lmao who do you think you are
@stevoofd4 жыл бұрын
This is the first comment I read that makes any sense with regards to the video. I can stop scrolling down now
@InternetListener Жыл бұрын
Hi from the future. The only photons I see are the scattered ones not the ones traveling through objects. Any updated for an actual application of this imaging system? 12 years almost later...