Lecture 1: Dot Product Lecture 2: Determinants Lecture 3: Matrices Lecture 4: Square Systems Lecture 5: Parametric Equations Lecture 6: Kepler's Second Law Lecture 7: Exam Review (goes over practice exam 1a at 24 min 40 seconds) Lecture 8: Partial Derivatives Lecture 9: Max-Min and Least Squares Lecture 10: Second Derivative Test Lecture 11: Chain Rule Lecture 12: Gradient Lecture 13: Lagrange Multipliers Lecture 14: Non-Independent Variables Lecture 15: Partial Differential Equations Lecture 16: Double Integrals Lecture 17: Polar Coordinates Lecture 18: Change of Variables Lecture 19: Vector Fields Lecture 20: Path Independence Lecture 21: Gradient Fields Lecture 22: Green's Theorem Lecture 23: Flux Lecture 24: Simply Connected Regions Lecture 25: Triple Integrals Lecture 26: Spherical Coordinates Lecture 27: Vector Fields in 3D Lecture 28: Divergence Theorem Lecture 29: Divergence Theorem (cont.) Lecture 30: Line Integrals Lecture 31: Stokes' Theorem Lecture 32: Stokes' Theorem (cont.) Lecture 33: Maxwell's Equations Lecture 34: Final Review Lecture 35: Final Review (cont.)
@harendrasingh23193 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot 😘
@umakantmishra61393 жыл бұрын
Where is jacobians
@rahuldhungel3 жыл бұрын
Lecture 18 : Change Of Variables and The Jacobian
@shaidniloy53562 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro, saved some time.
@DemiHalf11 ай бұрын
yo no entiendo; was this info not in the playlist?
@LAnonHubbard10 жыл бұрын
It was awesome to learn about the Jacobian. I've seen this here and there and never understood what it was. Thanks!!
@HenryEBrass5 жыл бұрын
Dr. Auroux is terrific at impromptu sketching. 19:14, look at the neatness of all six boards!
@wontpower6 жыл бұрын
At first, I though "rangle" was just a weird shorthand for rectangle
@athelstanrex2 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@BrownMunde6062 жыл бұрын
Me too
@wlockhart2 жыл бұрын
So did I. However these students burst into laughter if the wind blows.
@avixek14 жыл бұрын
I am completely following the mit courseware to study my pre engineering courses awesome > thanks MIT
@ashwinjain55662 жыл бұрын
i was completely lost for 2 whole days trying to make intuitive sense of it after my college professor taught us this. I mean i only got taught the algorithm for finding the jacobian but not what it actually is but after watching this, it finally clicked and i am so happy lmao
@NehadHirmiz9 жыл бұрын
Prof. Auroux, Thank you for these wonderful lectures
@wildfire593210 жыл бұрын
17:29 by the way a rangle is a bit of gravel fed to a hawk
@atul61472 жыл бұрын
he does it not as if he's doing math, but like art, like poetry
@yashagarwal39993 жыл бұрын
The best ever way to teach Jacobians, wow greatest of the great, Jacobians .......great, the professor explanation ...great
@vinaydeepbeeram66982 жыл бұрын
Professor Dennis Auroux's #1 Fan
@prafullvilas19313 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't have built this mentality that I'll never be able to get even average at maths if we had teachers like this 🙏🙏🙏
@Manocheher.A Жыл бұрын
I was looking at some of these videos as recently I took all my college math classes. I was able to follow along but got a bit out of tract. Later, I noticed I have yet to take this class and will need it in university. 😂
@111abdurrahman5 жыл бұрын
This is a pure enjoyment to take Prof. Auorox lectures
@elamvaluthis72682 жыл бұрын
Very nice.painstakingly explaining things nice.
@norbitaspower11 жыл бұрын
great professor. thank you mit for this classes.
@serden88045 жыл бұрын
Perfect professor and perfect explanation, how strange
@shakesbeer0012 жыл бұрын
I am a little confused. It seems to me that u-axis and v-axis should not be perpendicular to each other.
@crane80352 жыл бұрын
I'm no expert but around 15:30 The prof. depicts the parallelogram in the UV plane ,but in reality the the sides are still on the axes in the UV plane because the axes them selves are sheared. But when we look at it from the vantage point of the XY plane ,they take the form such parallelogram.
@10keys14 жыл бұрын
@fermixx he did it without the drawing... he drew the bounds.... and the way he figured the second bound drawing he did was just plug in the x y points into the substitution equations he made for u v...
@squirtlesquirtle946 жыл бұрын
Explanation of the relationship between the determinant of the Jacobian and the change of variables was handwavy at best! Would be nice to see a rigorous derivation of how these things work instead of accepting a magic formula...
@nadekang81985 жыл бұрын
Again, I wish I had a calculus professor like him........instead of professors writing and teaching calculus using their own textbook purely with mathematica....it was so hard for me to get the intuition when I was in college...
@alexryyan9 ай бұрын
I KNEW IT WAS A LINEAR TRANSFORMATION. I am retaking calc 3 cuz my HS credit didnt count and having taken lin alg, i saw the jacobian and im like WAITTTTT A SECOND. I cannot believe its not standard to teach what the Jacobian actually is (ik its not always linear but I digress)
@13Septem1313 жыл бұрын
@Djole0 "It is the second semester in the freshman calculus sequence"
@lee_land_y695 жыл бұрын
intro to linear transformations and horrors of linear algebra haha
@HimanshJainYTube8 жыл бұрын
Fantastic Lecture. Loved it.. Thanks a lot :)
@saitrinath259111 жыл бұрын
i like math series in ocw mit veryy much
@Bunk_Moreland8 жыл бұрын
what does "rangle" even mean? it is clearly a shorthand for rectangle
@dagonmeister3 жыл бұрын
Get the feeling that classroom is full of trolling
@rishavdhariwal47823 ай бұрын
Prof. Auroux used a linear approx for the general case to show how small changes in x and y can be related to u and v by their respective partial derivatives given that u=g(x,y) v=h(x,y), but this will only be valid for as said small changes in x and y. Therefore if changes in x and y are of finite value (meaning the region we are integrating over has some finite but non zero change in their x,y coords) then how will we relate the da element of such a region to the da' (area element in u,v coords)?
@priyanksharma11246 жыл бұрын
Nailed it! what an awesome lecture
@binyillikcinar15 жыл бұрын
How does Jacobian go with nonlinear transformations? Namely if I have u=g(x,y) v=h(x,y) then will dudv=|J|dxdy be satisfied where J=(dg/dx dg/dy; dh/dx dh/dy) ? (here d's are actually referring to partial derivatives)
@user-dt8xi7cd4e8 жыл бұрын
who didn't understand the transformation of variables I recommend you to watch wildberger linear algebra series on you tube it is very helpful, he will take step by step with a wonderful journey of linear algebra.
@youmah258 жыл бұрын
+rami nejem نعم
@VineetKumar-wp9yr6 жыл бұрын
rami nejem go and watch 3blue1brown series on linear algebra
@codingWorld7093 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sir. You are very handsom
@jimallysonnevado39733 жыл бұрын
I have some small issue about the Jacobian. Why do we even need to take the absolute value of the determinant? In single variable case, the derivative can similarly be thought of as the "exchange rate" for the dx to du if we change variables and in the sense similar to the Jacobian but in there even if the detivative is negative we don't take absolute values. But why should we take absolute values in the Jacobian determinant case?
@joebrinson50402 жыл бұрын
Because area is always a positive value and you are using the Jacobian as the "scaling factor" between two areas.
@jimallysonnevado39732 жыл бұрын
@@joebrinson5040 but that does not address the one dimensional case. For instance if you are going to compute the integral of x^2 dx from x=0 to x=1. If you want to do the substitution u=-x, you will similarly get du=-dx. The negative sign means we are multiplying by -1 which can also be thought of as the one-dimensional Jacobian. However, in this case we are not allowed to take absolute value because it will change the value of the integral. Ie, (if we take absolute values also in one-dimensional case) the integral in variable u will become integral (-u)^2 |-1| du from u=0 to u=-1. Which further becomes -1/3. But the actual value of the original integral is 1/3. Clearly, we don't take absolute values in one-dimensional case but why we do it in higher-dimensional integrals?
@dsdsspp7130 Жыл бұрын
@@jimallysonnevado3973 I think you're right. you need to use the Jacobian itself both in the one dimension and higher dimensional cases. you could also just switch the lower and upper bounds with each other. if transformation of your space changes orientation then the integral will change signs so you need to multiply it by a negative one, regardless of dimension.
@leochen81493 жыл бұрын
So brilliant lecture, help me a lot!
@debendragurung30336 жыл бұрын
17:49 I like the word rangle
@fermixx14 жыл бұрын
is there any way to change the bounds of integrations without drawing? because most of the times it wont be so easy to draw. (or i wont have the time to do it) cant i just plug in the bound values into the change of variable's equations or do some other calculus?
@SPRINGGREEN813Ай бұрын
I think the jacobian is used for that(btw, what are you doing after 14 years)
@pdxginni14 жыл бұрын
@pdxginni Yes, it's just me. I had the screen maximized. Wouldn't pass without minimizing.
@dishapanchal30603 жыл бұрын
AT we reach 35 minutes of this lecture, Why they have written -rsin∅? what is x sub theta?
@thatsfantastic313 Жыл бұрын
♥ Love to MIT
@not_amanullah2 ай бұрын
Thanks ❤🤍
@liviumircea69053 жыл бұрын
Why du*dv = 5*dx*dy ? 'A' region is a rectangle but A' is a parallelogram and its area is not du*dv ...
@shakesbeer0012 жыл бұрын
10:23 In the u-v coordinates, should the parallelogram still be referred to as Delta A, instead of Delta A'?
@CotyAbadie13 жыл бұрын
The one person that disliked this didn't get into MIT.
@GodlessNfree10 жыл бұрын
great video thanks
@nate7645 Жыл бұрын
Filled with rage that my terrible calc 3 prof's lecture is a waste of time compared to this
@novanecros91454 жыл бұрын
Don't y'all love a good ol' rangle?
@abab71966 жыл бұрын
40:32 hahauahaha he really hit the nail with saying some mysterious function ahhwuauaHWWUWHWHAA
@pyrole4 жыл бұрын
Finally understood Jacobian :)
@ahmadhaitham61778 жыл бұрын
How come he considered a hyperbola that passed by (x=0) and (y=0) simultaneously ??? at 46:55 .
@hershyfishman29294 жыл бұрын
The integral has to include all values of (x, y) from x = 0 to 1 and from y = 0 to 1. The actual point (0, 0) won't matter if you include it or not since the function is 0 at that point, but you can't start at the "next" point. There is no next point. As close as you get to (0,0) there will always be infinite points yet closer.
@hnkul70212 жыл бұрын
16:31 "For any other rangle"?
@98885654073 жыл бұрын
hey supp/
@DestinyQx14 жыл бұрын
heh RANGLE! @ 17:15 i never took multi calc, he seems like a good prof
@jrkirby9313 жыл бұрын
rangle
@ZopteY11 жыл бұрын
THAAAAAAANKKKK YOUUUUU!
@An1MuS15 жыл бұрын
Thank you a lot.
@HanitpalSingh11 жыл бұрын
i didn't catch "rangle" until the students pointed it out
@aniketkedare87 жыл бұрын
Why where limit were not defined in terms of u and v in respect of x and y
@sharifkhudairi5368 Жыл бұрын
sorry my sister dsnt know any of that :(
@thereisnogodbutdalegribble56872 жыл бұрын
Does anyone else really like the yellow chalk at 13:37 ?
@chaitanyaanish81038 жыл бұрын
my doubt in this lecture: sir told dA' is the area of the square in uv coordinates,but acc. to the diagram it dA' is the area of a parallelogram whose sides are not parallel to uv axes,how can that be possible
@deeptochatterjee5327 жыл бұрын
Chaitanya Anish Actually he said the area of the square is proportional to dxdy and so when you convert the variables the scaling factor of the areas should be equal to the ratio of dudv to dxdy
@pdxginni14 жыл бұрын
Is it just me, or does this lecture stop working at 2:31? I've restarted, but nothing.
@psibarpsi3 жыл бұрын
Just you.
@quasirdp4 жыл бұрын
perfection
@ishadev013 жыл бұрын
thankyou sir
@bobkameron3 жыл бұрын
This course is awesome!
@shoxruxturaev19316 жыл бұрын
i'm confused to the extent that i don't know what i'm confused about. ( probably i'm missing something)
@DeepakSah3.08 жыл бұрын
thanku
@foundingtitan9759 Жыл бұрын
24:13
@Souliee15 жыл бұрын
thanks :)
@MrDevin66612 жыл бұрын
MIT or UCLA for medicine?
@DeadPool-jt1ci4 жыл бұрын
there not even comparable , i hope u chose MIT
@weltschmerz13711 жыл бұрын
lol close up of rangle
@Djole013 жыл бұрын
is this the first year of college?
@psibarpsi3 жыл бұрын
Yes!
@muddwell15 жыл бұрын
thats cool chalk.
@sifiso50553 жыл бұрын
Hagoromo Chalk
@shukiboy55146 жыл бұрын
nice
@rarulis10 жыл бұрын
rangle is a funny sounding word.
@MegaRickastley11 жыл бұрын
Those blackboards...
@DieguezCreate12 жыл бұрын
i hear he was kermit's voice on sesame street for some time 0.o
@08414812 жыл бұрын
@MrDevin666 UCLA
@morani78910 жыл бұрын
Two people go to Harvard...
@youmah258 жыл бұрын
+morani789 and 3 to stanford
@MeAndCola5 жыл бұрын
I hate the camerawork
@and1fer10 жыл бұрын
MATGRRIXUE!!
@danideboe7 жыл бұрын
Prof Leonard is way better
@kittycat17687 жыл бұрын
ya, but his videos are insanely long (imagine how long it would take to watch an entire course)
@malefetsanekoalane45492 жыл бұрын
@@kittycat1768 If you think that is long try Prof Leonard. Now that is insane.