Oxford Calculus: Jacobians Explained

[@TomRocksMaths]

Check out the full 'Oxford Calculus' series here: kzbin.info/aero/PLMCRxGutHqflZoTY8JCm1GRzCdGXvZ3_S

[@THEMATT222]

👍👍👍

[@ranam]

the jacobian has an rate of scaling under transformation and jacobians are the true derivative and finding the correct scaling factors from determinants to make the explosion in Riemannian rectangles of the integrals the error converges with infinite sum so the scaling factor is there to rectify the error rate in convergence in rectangles under transformation the rectangles explode and contract and at miniature scale the each point under transformation has the scaling factor

[@abbe23456789]

Feels great to know why the Jacobian comes into the calculations when switching coordinate systems. I never learned that while doing multivariate calculus this past semester. Keep up the good work! Regards from a fellow math nerd from Sweden.

[@SquidBeats]

Jesus Christ is God Almighty, The everlasting Father !

[@sachin-mavi]

Its multivariable calculus, not multivariate calculus. there is a difference ... rest everything is affirmative ...

[@pyropulseIXXI]

@@sachin-mavi multivariable and multivariate calculus are the same thing yo uoaf

[@bb5k947]

🤓

[@bb5k947]

@@SquidBeats amen

[@megistone]

I'm shocked how you've packed many topics such as vector product, Jacobian, areas, and more into such a video, while clearly explaining Jacobian, the main topic. Even if I don't speak English well I can understand it and it is very interesting to watch the explanation and behavior as if you are transmitting energy to the viewer. I'm very satisfied.

[@dmc-au]

I brushed across the Jacobian while learning statistics recently. It seemed reasonable that we'd need to scale by the change of space in that context, but this video made it concrete as to what was going on behind the scenes. Thanks, Tom!

[@TomRocksMaths]

you're very welcome :)

[@leocheung2578]

Hey there! The second you explained the Jacobian as the stretch factor of converting from one coordinate system to another, I understood it so much better! This was so much better of an explanation than my textbook

[@shashwatkumar6536]

You're exactly like how Machine Gun Kelly would have looked if he taught Calculus

[@mr.ditkovich6379]

😂

[@nugboy420]

Machine Gun Tom(my)

[@rafaelfreitas6159]

...and if he didn't try to diss Eminem. RIP

[@shashwatkumar6536]

@@rafaelfreitas6159 😂😂😂

[@redumptious2544]

I just recently called him “the MGK of mathematics”.

[@LucasVieira-ob6fx]

This is by far the most comprehensible explanation of the Jacobian I've ever found. Nice work!

[@TomRocksMaths]

glad it was helpful!

[@paulmcghee6160]

Thanks for your exceptional work Tom. I've got a degree in maths and still learning little things like this really makes sure I keep lifting my knowledge. You're putting a load of effort into these videos. It is greatly appreciated.

[@TomRocksMaths]

you're very welcome :)

[@Deviated88]

I envy the ability to be good and understand math, I’m doing intermediate algebra right now in college and I’m having a hard time grasping the concept. Love your videos, keep it up!

[@saraswatasensarma6041]

Thank you so much. I am a first year Maths student from India, and these simple yet beautiful concepts are what keep mathematics in my heart. Keep up the great work Sir!!

[@davidgillies620]

This really should be taught at A-level rather than first-year undergrad courses. Jacobians act as a nice sliproad onto the main highway of tensors and differential geometry in general, whose introduction is in turn often delayed (or even omitted) at bachelor's level.

[@AcryllixGD]

This is such a fantastic video! I'm currently in year 13, thinking of doing a maths degree, im fascinated with calculus, its by far my favourite aspect of maths, not only did multivariable integration make sense but also the use of determinants. Amazing video!

[@jpmagnos]

You really are saving me in university... I feel like I can understand where things comes from and why they are the way they are when you explain it... much better than my university professor who is more interested in making us fail class

[@pyropulseIXXI]

This is super funny, because this is literally just out of the textbook. Maybe if you oafs read the textbook, you'd learn something. I tutor math and physics, and people say the same thing to me. "You make it so much easier than the professor, and you actually explain where it comes from!" This jacobian 'proof' is straight out of any Calculus textbook

[@sarkiskaralian1765]

You sir are a very valuable math resource for students and perhaps even teachers. Thank you!

[@TomRocksMaths]

You're very welcome!

[@daniellund3840]

Absolutely love this video, currently in the process of studying vector calculus (and some other stuff I also don't understand) for machine learning and struggled to wrap my head around jacobian's, this makes so much more sense now

[@TomRocksMaths]

Glad it was helpful!

[@TomiThemself]

Tom never fails to explain what seem as hard mathematical concepts, in really easy way. Thank You!

[@kevindegryse9750]

I already knew how to use change of coordinates and Jacobian. But it is actually the first time I understand the geometric meaning of it :) Thank you

[@TomRocksMaths]

you're welcome :)

[@dv5855]

What a mesmerizing presentation. I had math through differential equations at university thirty-five years ago. If you had given lectures, such as you present here, perhaps the 4.0 GPA achieved would had met something. Grade Inflation was in full bloom. Thank you.

[@TomRocksMaths]

[@ricksan5583]

Outstanding Sir. I disliked most of my math teachers because they never gave at least an insight to the why and we always had no explanations or the ' you have to trust this'. I never did, I always had to consult higher math books but many times they were too high. The best solution is a knowledgeable professor. Thanks again( I am an electrical engineer who happens to love math)

[@jackflash8756]

Best intuitive explanation that I've seen so far and for once , even with my weak maths knowledge , understood it for the 1st time. Other youtube presentations never clicked with me but this one did.

[@likithstochastic]

Thanks! That was explained in an intuitive way. I guess the key here is to think of the elemental rectangular areas changing in to rotated parallelograms during the coordinate transformation. The example you gave in the beginning with regard to the area of the circle makes the concept clearer.

[@science-therealfun4765]

This video is too good. So informative and he explained such a difficult calculation so easily. Hats off and keep it up.Thanks Tom👍❤

[@TomRocksMaths]

you're very welcome :)

[@actualBIAS]

Bro, for real. As one of your generation I am happy to see that you stood consistent with the style of our generation.

[@antoniofernandesdequeiroga6197]

Congratulation to Tom for introducing the geometrical concept of Jacobian in a very clear manner.(Brazil).

[@jameshamilton356]

OMG! You are the best teacher to explain complex subjects.

[@TomRocksMaths]

glad you found it helpful :)

[@prille09]

I love your explainations, I now have a better understanding of what I’ve learned in the past 😊 thanks so much for your videos

[@TomRocksMaths]

you're very welcome :)

[@starsun7455]

I always feel grateful for sharing your high-level lectures on KZbin. you are cool.

[@TomRocksMaths]

My pleasure!

[@umumuntuksemua9831]

Yes finally your video that i watch for college, not for leisure!!!

[@RC32Smiths01]

Thank you for always providing such valuable learning content!

[@TomRocksMaths]

You're very welcome :)

[@RC32Smiths01]

@@TomRocksMaths Cheers!

[@facr]

And this works so well also for triple integrals and volume calculations. Nice video. Greets!

[@sabzimatic]

Today I understood what Jacobian really means. Thank you.

[@blakejohnson4834]

Hi Tom. I come from practically 0 background of mathematics. I enjoy these videos however as you’re concise with your explanations and breakdown the overall operation to the basics in a sense. I think I may dive into mathematics at some stage and see more what it’s all about. Take care my man ! With love from Australia

[@TomRocksMaths]

with love to Aus

[@ChandrasegaranNarasimhan]

Thank you. I always wondered what jacobian was. The geometric explanation was beautiful.

[@ian-haggerty]

Defining basis vectors as the rate of change of position vector would make this clearer: i = dR / dx, j = dR / dy, dA = |(dx * i) x (dy * j)|. The Jacobian naturally springs up when considering change of coordinates under these definitions. You don't need to rely on cartesian and the area element is well defined.

[@henrymarkson3758]

Demystifying the Jacobian in 30 minutes. Nicely done.

[@TomRocksMaths]

glad it was helpful!

[@geekyprogrammer4831]

Don't judge this man by his attire and theme. He is pure genius.

[@TomRocksMaths]

[@jamesjohnson2394]

Tom I really like your videos. You're taking complex ideas and really explaining them clearly and you're very good at presenting!. Thank you for taking the time in doing them! they're very helpful! I'd say you're very good at this so keep up the great work! :)

[@TomRocksMaths]

Thanks, will do!

[@SOPHOCLESIFY]

I'm finally learning at school the sort of material he talks about in this channel, feels a bit like a milestone haha.

[@jacobvandijk6525]

Great visualization! That's how you make math accessible for a larger public. Good stuff.

[@TomRocksMaths]

thanks :)

[@erikross-rnnow5517]

Whenever I encounter double integrals of some version of the unit circle I’ve always been frustrated by the sudden appearance of the r term in rdrdtheta. But thanks to your wonderful explanation It finally begins to make a little sense :))

[@Rene_Christensen]

The further you go out radially, the bigger the area you sweep for a given angle.

[@seanlynch6323]

I took calc 2 at my university my freshman year and never new where that rdrd0 came from when switching from Cartesian to polar coordinates. Brilliant visualization + explanation!

[@TomRocksMaths]

glad it was helpful :)

[@Ethan-de5kt]

Is this related to the jacobian in robotics? What would we do differently if we knew the new coordinate frame was only a rotation of the previous and not a scale?

[@quasirdp]

the best Jacobian explanation in the whole Universe

[@TomRocksMaths]

[@arthurcpiazzi]

Best lecture about this subject I ever seen 👏👏👏

[@TomRocksMaths]

glad it was helpful :)

[@CTing-y1c]

26:32 I used to think that in 2x2 matrix, the 1st column represents the destination of original x vector, and 2nd col for the y vector. But it seems the transformed x and y vector can be either columns or rows respectively without changing its determinant.

[@iwikal]

At 17:06 you say that |a| |b| sin θ is the cross/vector product, but really it's the length of the vector product. The vector product itself is, as the name suggests, a vector (as opposed to the dot/scalar product, which is a scalar). That confused me for a minute, before looking up the formula. Similarly, I've heard that some sources saying the Jacobian is actually that matrix you create, and the scalar you get when you take the determinant is simply called "the Jacobian determinant". I know I'm just being picky.

[@johnchristian5027]

This was a great video for self learning multivariable calculus, nice!

[@jeffersonluizbento20]

Excelente explicação. Foi a primeira vez que vi Jacobiano explicado de forma tão simples.

[@SouvikCivil]

Very nice explanation sir,deserve more views and likes

[@manfredvonrichtofen3863]

Thank you so much, theoretical physics is soooo much easier with your explanation for the mathematical concepts ♥️

[@nareshmehndiratta]

congratulatons, please make use of maths in simplifying the wonders of theoretical physics

[@thobilemahlangu2574]

At 11:03 wasn't the "dr" suppose to be at the end? to correspond with the integral part cause that is what we were taught. someone correct me please if I am incorrect

[@abdulrahmanmahmoudanter8829]

Using the differential approximation of x,y as functions os r and theta I think of the Jacobian matrix as the linear transformation that acts upon the space of dr and dtheta and the determinant of it as the stretch factor, I don't know if this is the formal way but i like it 😂

[@its_robbietime1333]

ive never seen a scene mathematician but im digging it

[@Fomalhaut0802]

Nice explainings! Huge thanks and greetings from Spain!

[@TomRocksMaths]

sending love to Spain

[@chordssongs7046]

Great explanation. I'd want to ask a question about the area ( 23:40 ) , I think you miss to put absolute value, it means Area = | Xu δu Yv δv - Xv δv Yu δu |

[@dumitruolteanu8663]

No chance to an answer !

[@ВадимАвва]

Excellent explanation. Thank you very much

[@edawgroe]

Can you recommend a good resource to explain the difference between 'd', 'cursive d', and 'delta' as they appear in these formulas?

[@RichWoods23]

They indicate (respectively) a derivative, a partial derivative and an infinitesimal change. Understanding the first and last of those is the starting point for learning calculus (assuming you already understand limits), for which you can find a number of online tutorials (I honestly can't advise on which might be the best for you, because it will depend on what you already know and how comfortable you are with it).

[@hreader]

I've already got the Maple Calculator! And very useful it is, too, especially as you say for visualisation.

[@TomRocksMaths]

It really is!

[@kleberfigueroa7473]

I saw this video days later, and today I was studying about soil mechanics where related this video content. And I thought "Oh, I saw this in a video on KZbin". Regards from Ecuador!

[@TomRocksMaths]

haha amazing!

[@elijahhallbasketball]

Wow I'm speechless this video is so amazing

[@jdubyabreh]

Excellent video. I wish all teachers were like you!

[@TomRocksMaths]

[@etharalali]

I wish I had been taught Jacobians this way many moons ago tbh. Well done Tom

[@TomRocksMaths]

glad it was helpful!

[@srikrishoo7]

Hey there, this has really helped me to make my concepts better, thanks for the work which u have done brother😊

[@gossipGirlMegan]

hi,professor,very helpful and very straightfoward, many thanks to you ,great expaination!!!

[@nestorv7627]

Instead of giving a vague argument for approximating the curvy rectangle in polar as a "normal" rectangle, you could've simply derived the area for an annular sector: The area of an annulus is A = π(b² - a²), b>a So that the area of an annular sector is A = π(b² - a²) × θ/2π Now let a=r, b=r + dr, and θ -> dθ Which gives the area of an infinitesimal annular sector: dA = [(r + dr)² - r²] dθ /2 = (r² +2r dr + dr² - r²) dθ = r dr dθ

[@TheOzpad]

HOLY SHIT ITS SO SIMPLE YET SO COMPLICATED AT THE SAME TIME

[@TomRocksMaths]

... like pretty much all of maths

[@ibrarhussain4868]

best explaination ever seen of this topic

[@nahuelleiva8460]

Nice video. I remember studying the Jacobian and the conversion from cartographic to polar coordinates during my degree career, good times. I remember too that these concepts could be applied to Physics but that was another thing that I didn't engage with haha

[@lukewatson8848]

Very cool video! I'm still a student so forgive me if I misunderstood, but when writing vectors in every math and physics class I've taken, they have normally been notated with an arrow drawn overtop of the varible, but in this video you underlined the varible instead. Is there actually any difference in meaning or is this just an example of different notation?

[@TomRocksMaths]

It’s just a notation thing - both can be used to mean a vector

[@lukewatson8848]

@@TomRocksMaths Gotcha, thank you!

[@anirudhsilverking5761]

New album dropping soon?

[@TomRocksMaths]

… I wish

[@beyond2781]

Can someone explain at 8:11 why did we take inner arc not the other one? Or what happens if we take the outer one?

[@F_A_F123]

You'd get (r + dr) dr dθ, which is just r dr dθ + r (dr)² dθ, and r (dr)² dθ is much smaller so we don't care about that

[@Z-eng0]

Literally best Jacobian video I've seen so far (and I've been searching for a *long* time about it), just have a few things I was wondering 1. Why do you do the u in the i direction and v in the j direction ? 2. The very last part of the Jacobian you were writing J = (Xu Yv - Xv Yu) del u del v, and the double integral was like -> J du dv So I didn't really get the very last approximation

[@RexxSchneider]

1. He didn't. He set x in the direction of the vector i and y in the direction of the vector j. He then set u in some arbitrary direction made up of one component of i and one component of j. Watch again from around 18:30 and you'll see that he transforms the vector i.dx into the vector (∂x/∂u).du.i + (∂x/∂v).dv.j. Similarly he sets up v in another arbitrary direction with i and j components. That transforms the vector j.dy into (∂y/∂u).du.i + (∂y/∂v).dv.j. 2. For some reason, he needlessly switched to using the confusing notation Xu to mean ∂x/∂u, and similarly Xv=∂x.∂v, Yu=∂y/∂u, Yv=∂y/∂v. You won't be the only one confused by that.

[@maxwellsequation4887]

Thank you sir for creating such a brilliant lecture ☺️

[@TomRocksMaths]

my pleasure

[@花火-i2o]

Professor，your class about the jocobian is excellent，but I don't understand what does dx/du ×delta u i（j）means😢😢Can you explain it，thanks sincerely

[@user-ye5fw7hi8e]

thanks, best explanation of Jacobian I found!

[@TomRocksMaths]

glad it helped!

[@NoswadYT]

Am I right in saying there is a link between the Jacobian written out in its derivative form and the Poisson Bracket structure?

[@cesarluishernandezpertuz8794]

Wow, realmente este canal......es mi mejor descubrimiento en KZbin. ..

[@craftjj]

0:27 Does anybody know more examples of this? I am doing a research about it and it would be highly appreciated.... Amazing video by the way! It is such an interesting topic!

[@fredg8328]

Thanks for this nice explanation. I remember I learned Jacobians at Univertisty 20 years ago, but I totallly forgot about them.

[@TomRocksMaths]

Glad it was helpful!

[@shresthshankhdhar375]

great explanation i am speechless 🙇

[@billthon1099]

Love this chap, i could easily learn from him.

[@just_another_wandering_soul]

Amazing lecture! Thank you so much...

[@sabahhadhood603]

Thanks a lot. An outstanding lecture.

[@spazmoidectomorf6209]

I've recently finished my further maths alevels, and am interested in delving further into calculus(integration, differentiation and differential equations). What books would you recommend for both self teaching, and ones which have practice exercises and solutions. Many thanks

[@juanroldan529]

You can always check out Stewart Calculus Early Transcendentals. I'm currently using to teach myself calculus and I'm having a jolly good time.

[@spazmoidectomorf6209]

@@juanroldan529 I looked at the contents, alot of it overlaps with what I've already done but there are new areas too. Does the book come with practice questions and solutions?

[@amansinghchoudhary]

Man I love these videos

[@TomRocksMaths]

[@mitchellsteindler]

8 years after taking calculus, I finally understand wtf a jacobian is. Teachers have so little empathy for that their students don't ALREADY know this stuff, that they forget to try and really explain it. "Oh just make it r dr dtheta because that's you transform from rectangular to polar". What?

[@tetrabromobisphenol]

The sign of a true master is humility. Those who feel the need to belittle students or obfuscate ideas are not intellectual heavyweights. The real masters are putting their efforts into solving serious problems and winning Fields Medals, not wasting their time flexing on undergrads.

[@mitchellsteindler]

@@tetrabromobisphenol I'm talking about high school. Nobody was flexing on anybody...

[@MarcAntoine1]

As an engineering student I can totally relate to this

[@crashandsideburns]

Woah, I was just talking to a friend about Jacobians yesterday. What a coincidence!

[@TomRocksMaths]

google is listening...

[@اوابالخليفه]

That is so brilliant! Thank you so much❤️

[@marale72uk]

Thanks for the video! But I think you have to take the modulus of the Jacobian in the example despite r is always greater or equal to cero. The Jacobian is not equal to the determinant, but to the modulus of the determinat of the Jacobian matrix , isn't it?

[@TomRocksMaths]

The Jacobian does have to be positive yes

[@aashsyed1277]

question. in order to find the jacobian, will we need to get x as a function of u , v? and same for y? is there another formula?

[@TomRocksMaths]

yes. we need to know the relationship between the old coordinate system and the new one

[@TheMvlproductionsinc]

Thank you i hate my universities calc course for physics it never goes into the why and it really frustrated me when the jacobian literally came out of nowhere. Sadly the exams are over now because this would have helped a lot! One question are there any answers or way to check your work on the maple learn thing?

[@TomRocksMaths]

no answers at the moment, though hopefully coming soon!

[@noelnakka1056]

what an wonderful explainantion by you .love you bro from india

[@galactusthehungry2681]

Hi just wondering do you know which one of the new coordinates you sub in for u and v, because when finding the determinant it will make the result negative if for example you let v=r and u=theta is there a certain way you should choose what u and v are or should you always take the positive result for the determinant?

[@TomRocksMaths]

You take the modulus of the result so it is always positive.

[@galactusthehungry2681]

@@TomRocksMaths thanks! Do you know if the jacobian for a 2d coordinates swap would be the same as one for a 3d swap? Or would there be some factor by which its stretched, a jacobian for the jacobian?

[@gedesuantika2053]

Good job, Tom.

[@rkversouryaanteon3120]

Great discussion

[@pazzy768]

loving the hair my guy #MakeEmoGreatAgain

[@TomRocksMaths]

#emosnotdead

[@andyrodrigoalvarado118]

so intuitive explanation, thanks dude

[@TomRocksMaths]

Glad it was helpful!

[@boukharroubamediane119]

Nicely and clearly explained. To be grateful to your video, I thank you, subscribe, like and share.👍

[@matirachamim7223]

20;25 I think there is a little mistake when you represent the transformed vector in the form of Original Cartesian and also when you write the Jacobian matrix . The result is the same because you change the location of two elements on the diagonal .