Pauli's exclusion Principle: Atomic Structure - 28 For Class 11th

Namaskar,
Greetings from M Learning India!
The Best Platform for your IIT JEE and NEET preparation.
The latest version of the App is now available on the Google Play Store and App Store.
You will experience the following:
Adv free video lectures and personalized video play speed.
Properly ordered and sequenced video, chapters, units, and subjects.
Course subscription for a year, half-year, and even three months.
Complete Package for students of class 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, and Droppers.
Download now
For more details
Call us at 9827039102
Mail us at [e-mail]
Visit us at www.m-learning.in
Regards,
M Learning India

[@dramolnagargoje9535]

CLlockwise and anticlockwise spin ur explaining oppositely...plz recheck..

[@Ajeet-Yadav-IIITD]

sir, in previous video you said z-component of angular momentum is given by √m(m+1). but now you said m.h/2π Is both are same thing.

[@kanchanrani2261]

According to my calculation their is a difference of 0.5

[@lostman8839]

The Invincible -Ajeet yadav I also noticed the same so was searching for this comment only

[@malabikabanerjee2205]

I also have the same confusion.

[@saikumarreddy4547]

“Interesting and completely different to most other modules. Useful lecture notes with many useful diagrams”

[@animeshgaur7188]

Great teaching and Great platform.

[@volodymyrbezverkhniy8687]

Quantum-mechanical analysis of the MO method and VB method from the position of PQS. The MO method and the VB method are analyzed using the principle of quantum superposition (PQS) and the method of describing a quantum system consisting of several parts. It is shown that the main assumption of the molecular orbitals method (namely, that the molecular orbital can be represented like a linear combination of overlapping atomic orbitals) enters into an insurmountable contradiction with the principle of quantum superposition. It is also shown that the description of a quantum system consisting of several parts (adopted in quantum mechanics) actually prohibits ascribe in VB method to members of equation corresponding canonical structures. Using the quantum superposition principle, the MO method and the VB method were analyzed and it is shown that they are in contradiction with quantum mechanics. Also, using the quantum-mechanical description of a system consisting of several parts, it is shown that the attribution of canonical structures to the members of the equation is incorrect. Therefore, both the MO method and the VB method did not describe molecules with chemical bonds but actually, a lot of atoms (of which the described molecules consisted). That is, in the quantum chemical calculations, the chemical bond was "lost". Therefore, in order to "introduce" a chemical bond into calculations and avoid conflict with quantum mechanics, it is suggested to postulate the existence of MO as a new fundamental quality that describes a specific chemical bond and is not derived from simpler structural elements. Quantum-mechanical analysis of the MO method and VB method from the position of PQS. vixra.org/pdf/1704.0068v1.pdf Bezverkhniy Volodymyr (viXra): vixra.org/author/bezverkhniy_volodymyr_dmytrovych

[@anithan.p6092]

Very good sir

[@VigneshGarg]

excellent teaching faculty

[@kanchanrani2261]

Sir √m(m+1)h/2π or mh/2π are same things or not??

[@noorshaikh8582]

Team m learning and it's lecture are so awesome 👌👌

[@mohitgoel011]

gained a lot from you sir

[@karanpareekfilms2781]

Brilliantly explained topic sir

[@alishamaurya9582]

Such a fantastic video giving the clear and distinctive information by the experienced teachers. Must watch!! to increase the knowlegde about this topic.

[@snehasingh781]

Very knowledgeable and helpful video

[@desi_in_us5548]

Awesome video!All the best ,keep doing!!

[@sumitkanaka6964]

wesome video!All the best ,keep doing!!

[@dishaagarwal4111]

Wonderful. Very simple to

[@harshitasingh5693]

A very nice and helpful video

[@vipulsharma71]

Incredible lecture...

[@Barshati]

Amazing concept

[@10arunesh]

Very useful for class 11th students

[@rishavsinghal7048]

Great content

[@vashukamdar5421]

Wow sir greater than others

[@seekhseseekho]

It really cleared my all doubts

[@abhishekgarg4404]

Awesome video

[@grishalvijay2114]

Great Explanation

[@csumanthreddy3112]

Wohoo.!

[@SharifBanda]

Well explained

[@bajrangbhansali715]

Amazing!

[@srijasomavarapu8598]

Adorable vedio

[@vikasjha1321]

Interesting lecture

[@poojasenapaty3488]

thank you for helping

[@sanskritipandey9033]

Nice one

[@mohdtajoddin8491]

What is the property of aximotal q,n number it's why not has perfect statement once you say that statement

[@ramadan9830]

great video

[@pubgworthtg]

Best explanation

[@krishnakantkr5296]

Well taken the class

[@snehbhajanka6110]

🙌🙌🙌🙌

[@pakshalgandhi5335]

Superb video

[@muskansingh2541]

Very helpful and useful for exams

[@niyamsahini1023]

best explanation sir

[@himadrimaity663]

best video sir

[@deekshadhingra3346]

very well explained

[@bobachef]

Nice lecture sir

[@diveshgupta2124]

Nice explanation

[@swarangisonavdekar4063]

Very nice

[@Nirajkumar-gs7pc]

Nice videos

[@saiyamsahani6979]

good explanation sir

[@chitramishra4245]

Amazing

[@harshtakhtani9982]

loved it

[@sarahkim4651]

Very useful

[@javedkhanpathan6660]

Nice lecture

[@prakharshukla2357]

there is mistake i think(27.00) ,,,,for any orbit n there are (2n-1) orbitals not 2n.square orbitals

[@nikitakamdar1779]

superbb

[@mousumisaha5085]

very good

[@vijayjain67]

Good

[@niveditashah4265]

Very helpful

[@dikshathorat8306]

great

[@venkatkunapuli8863]

thank you

[@pramodxb]

Helpful

[@kritiyadav6416]

very nice

[@kunalgupta2568]

very helpful

[@ishitav95]

helpful sir thanku

[@ayushgupta5527]

wow

[@tushargoyal3804]

Well discussed

[@mlearningindia]

Hello Tushar, Thank you for watching Regards, M Learning India 9826023096, 9826023696

[@dheerajnathawat4551]

your videos are amazing. i just luv your way of teaching. but plz make ur videos free

[@zoyaahmad5330]

nice

[@prateekaggarwal3704]

clear cut explanation

[@nimishpatil266]

Sir wrote -1/2 for clockwise spin and +1/2 for anticlockwise spin. But in MH Board book it is given that -1/2 for anticlockwise and +1/2 for clockwise also but in diagram -1/2 for clockwise and +1/2 for anticlockwise pg.no 64. What is right?

[@mlearningindia]

Hello nimish, You can easily clear all your doubts through our New App for Students. We would like to let you know about our Doubt Forum app. You can download our "M Learning Forum for Students" for free from Google Play Store. If you like our app, then please put a review on Google Play Store. For more details contact - 9827039111 Keep Supporting M Learning India

[@arghyamahato3441]

gd video

[@User39814]

sir the number of orbital 2n+1 not n^2 in first case.

[@nimishpatil266]

Bhaswat Mohanty you are wrong.

[@nannukannu7728]

sir i have a doubt that clockwise spin is 1/2 or -1/2 ? As in your lecture i think it os wrong so plz reply me.

[@anushkadandawate6860]

it is totally on us which direction v take as positive or negative

[@prakharshukla2357]

yes u r right,,,,, it is positive when clockwise,,,,, there are many mistakes in video dont follow him

[@veenujain5300]

Anushka Dandawate Yeah she is right it is our choice to take clockwise +1/2 or -1/2 and samw for anti clockwise. But remember if one is taken +1/2 other will always be -1/2.

[@muzammilahmad2833]

such a good explanation

[@mlearningindia]

Hello Muzammil Ahmad, Thank you for your appreciation...please let us know which class are you studying in to assist you better.

[@RahulSharma-rm9cw]

mlearning india asi 11 v CH pad de a g

[@seemarawal6190]

plz make videos free

[@taruntarun9214]

so many student it free ! sir plz make it

[@shriramprajapati2776]

wrong explaining it's positive in clockwise

[@ypierce2398]

best video sir

[@bbviness6212]

nice

[@SuperLeeladhar]

nice