HUGE Changes! New Platoons for Bolt Action 3rd Edition!

[@DrakesHobbiesAndGames]

Warlord have clarifired that one Rifle Platoon unlocks one of each other platoon, you only need two Rifle Platoons if you want a second platoon of a specific type, ie two Armoured Platoons or two Heavy Weapon Platoons.

[@MordianGlory]

Good to know! Thanks for sharing :)

[@devlaminckx3382]

Actually I read it like that during the video. For me it didn't need clarification. The "you can only have as many multiples of any Platoon type as you have Rifle Platoons" was perfectly worded for me.

[@ArchaiKM]

I like how this can make for easier themed forces

[@ArchaiKM]

My biggest gripe, however, is pistols. I love giving them to my officers (especially early war) because it was thematic, and I figured at least they had tough fighter. Now, there is no benefit to it so why not just take an SMG?

[@Bottle-OBill]

THIS! I can finally build a force to represent an Australian MG Battalion platoon! 🎉

[@h2835]

Well: The wording of the rule was pretty straightforward in my opinion: "As many multiples of any platoon types" means, that total number of Rifle platoons is the upper limit for any other type of platoon. So if you take a single minimum Rifle platoon, then you can spend the rest of your points on all of the other platoons. But you can only take 0-1 of any type...

[@unit0033]

that didnt seem clear

[@michaelwain3198]

You can take armoured platoons in 2nd ed Bolt Action, with 5 tanks - using the Tank War book or campaign books

[@VioletMoonMediaWargames]

yeah, but now the accompanying infantry don't need transports

[@michaelwain3198]

@@VioletMoonMediaWargames that's not the point i was making though

[@VioletMoonMediaWargames]

@@michaelwain3198 yeah, I was just pointing out the key difference. The new edition should bring together all the rules from across the different books.

[@Swrdfshtrmbns]

So excited to see how this turns out.

[@MordianGlory]

BRO! Thanks you so much for the big super comment :) I'm very excited for the new edition, it looks like Warlord is properly evolving the game and there are some big and interesting changes coming

[@stacypierce3335]

Great video!! I'm really looking forward to all your new content when things kick off ❤

[@adiebland9220]

Has Bolt Action V3 become Artillery Action? I see lots of heavy artillery in the not too distant future? Just finished reading the forum on the Warlord site around V3 new platoon composition

[@michaelwain3198]

I've got Sharpe's Command, it's weird how they can't decide whether he's a Captain or Major, as he's referred to as both. He should just be a Captain given the chronological order of the book, other than that, it's good.

[@briarsandbantams]

I like this. Makes more sense than a "reinforced platoon".

[@jonathanbirkeland1085]

A reinforced unit is typically how real military organizations operate. However, this new system is essentially simulating the same thing where you have a Rifle Platoon that is reinforced by another type of platoon in its entirety rather than a single attachment from another type of platoon. Both make sense.

[@briarsandbantams]

@jonathanbirkeland1085 Yes, I know military units support each other. I spent 14 years in the military. Attaching single howitzers or armor to an infantry platoon was goofy game design. The new way is a more sensical way to do it as a base. Future supplements can portray more ad hoc organizations with off the wall attachments.

[@Flippotycoon4583]

At first I tought it was done like you say one rifle platoon plus something else and so forth. But after re-reading the article I am pretty sure one rifle platoon unlocks one of each other platoon and you only need two rifle platoons if you want two Armored platoons for exsample.

[@TikitheHutt]

This seems ....... interesting, I'm worried how IJA/IJN's unique units are going to be affected.

[@MordianGlory]

As long as we can still take bamboo spears we will be alright

[@Johnnyboy19882]

Almost seems like Bolt action is going from platoon vs platoon, to company vs company at least in size?

[@shadowcat3163]

Encouraging larger games forcing people to but more models.

[@itsallfunandgames723]

I remember back when I was playing Dust Warfare the vehicle mounted machine guns were just the same as the emplaced ones, and I thought there was just no way it worked like that in real life. I like this new way of doing it, it's a very clean fix.

[@ZhukovsBoots]

It's one of any platoon for each rifle platoon.

[@theorkinquisitor]

I love that light and medium mortars not competing with each other

[@julianwarren7770]

I believe historically this was more acurate… at least in British doctrine the light mortar was a platoon level weapon whereas the medium mortar was company level.

[@stephenwood6663]

@@julianwarren7770 The trouble is that a lot of countries didn't have these at the same time: in both the German and Soviet armies, the platoon would lose light mortars as the company gained medium mortars. A late-war German army shouldn't have grenatenwerfers at all unless if it's following the TO&Es (which, to be fair, many German units didn't).

[@Schyzofrenic87]

may favourite change, I can take my SS dudes as general experience troops instead of veteran only. their plan worked , just bought another 30 guy box so i can actually have some boots on the field to shield my tiger

[@teenytinymaracas33]

As a French player a welcome my 3 Howitzer 5 medium mortar platoon options. Also I don't think platoon commanders will be any better. Warlord knows their game and knows they are a tax and that will be a stealth balance for being allowed to take these new platoons, which looks so far that they could be used for cheese.

[@marcmiddleton2277]

Would be cool if the vehicle machine guns gave the main gun a small buff. Like if the machine gun hits a tank or infantry unit, regardless of damage or not, main gun got a small boost to hit. Re-roll or +1, I don't know how much room is in the rules for it.

[@BattleDragon88]

I hope we get japanese overmanned mmg squad

[@tomek5107]

Hello players! Is there a system/game similar to Bolt Actions but reflecting the military weapons you currently have?

[@sambauman69]

@@tomek5107 following

[@justinmsc5]

I actually hope Platoon Commanders are very diverse. Army command is sometimes good and sometimes bad. You should have the choice of super cheap commanders that are literally a tax, maybe even give some penalty. Then you have expensive commanders that, like MG said, gives real benefits that you want to have. That way your elite army can be even more elite, and your horde can be even more horde!

[@Daito12Master]

I hope that there could be a Ha-Go spam, that would be amazing!

[@TheTobaccoman]

I wonder then if they dialed back MMGs on tanks if they’ll put in the tracer fire to make their HE or AT main gun more accurate ? If so I’m all for the MMG change on the tanks. They are pretty clever with their fluffy stuff so I for one would love some tracer fire accuracy improvement.

[@CaptainJackEgg]

I am a little worried about how many officers we will need. I think most players have only one. Also now cant just throw in a tank you have to take other vehicle which is quite an inconvenience.

[@VioletMoonMediaWargames]

an armoured car (including jeeps and bike/sidecar) can be one of the vehicles along side the tank.

[@comradezy]

All the rules changes i've seen for this edition seem awesome! Very hyped.

[@Madlarkin00]

I'm thinking 3 chi ha and a type 92 tankette, then my rifleman platoon minimum size, heavy Weapon platoon 2 mmg, 2 medium mortar and a second minimum rifle platoon if it works that way

[@sirdovermeyer]

Will the japanese type 94 tankette be an exception to the vehicle machine gun rule?

[@andystocker3754]

No mention of national characteristics in Warlord's preview of V3 . Particularly free units in force roster. Are they gonna scrap national characteristics ?

[@buddyboy7276]

So the M1 Garand which was a semi automatic rifle will get the same shots as bolt action rifles like the kar98 and the SMLE? And does the M1/M2 carbine count as a rifle, smg, or assault rifle?

[@Wraithnine]

American tanks used the 50cal as suppression fire on ground targets.

[@WoodImp]

16 heavy mortar japanese list is already built and ready to go!

[@ShadowGJ]

I was hoping there would be more compatibility with all the current starter army boxes. As it stands, it looks like a portion of the included units will be effectively unusable without additional purchases. For instance, I recently got the Fallschirmjaeger starter box, and 3e seems to nuke my ability to use its flamethrower team or Panzerschreck team under any circumstances. Similarly, the medium mortar team is out of the picture unless I pretend it's a light one. Oh, same with the PaK 40. That's close to half the box out of action, even if I went out and bought all the damn officers every little composition pivot requires. I'm not impressed.

[@sadnessinside123]

Are the previous army books obsolete now?

[@TheBones1970]

My understanding from another review is that they are redundant with 3rd Ed.

[@stephenwood6663]

Look at how they massacred my boys. :( Yes, there were complaints about snipers online, usually from people who didn't understand how to do counter-sniping (the biggest threat to a sniper's life and limb is another sniper. This means enemy snipers will be very high on a sniper's to-kill list: even if your sniper loses, your MG is probably safe). I keep career stats for the units in my Bolt Action armies, and my best sniper has scored 20 kills over the course of 36 games: a success rate of just under 59%. That's pretty good, but it's hardly game-breaking: even if my opponent doesn't bother with counter-sniping at all, his machine gun has a decent chance of surviving the entire battle, despite the attentions of my sniper.

[@damienthecadian8164]

The Char 2C is looking better and better. It's got enough MMGs and a howitzer to do anti-infantry. If I include a rifle platoon and two AT Guns, that should make for a solid force.

[@dariostabletopminatures]

6:11 5 Vehicles!!! YUMMY

[@h.s.lafever3277]

i read it as half of your army will always by inf platoons.... if you have 4 inf platoons, then you can have 4 other platoons of any type, for a total of 8... BA is an infantry centric game...

[@williamrthompsonjr556]

You're not building a platoon anymore, you're building s ksmpfgruppe, or a battlegroup, if you can take "As many multiples of any types can be taken literally. As always, it will depend on how many points will be available and the cost of the units themselves.

[@jamesmaclennan4525]

Remember that these are only the Generic platoons and that presumably the nation/Campaign book rewrites will give us more flexible platoon organisation. I for one am happy to see the end of Assault pistols but the SAS/LRDG has been seriously nerfed with the new Vehicle MG rules

[@williamkarl-gustafmoller8492]

Recce vehicles with 1 LMG or 1 MMG; they will be considered over priced. Losing half their shots is bad.

[@Wraithnine]

But what if I want some of each I'm gonna end up with 6 platoons with commanders....

[@kdhlkjhdlk]

So I can't do all lancers anymore? Probably not going to buy boring units so I can play.

[@drizztiley8740]

Well I have a couple different forces, because what gamer has only one army, I mostly play German so I can be the de facto bad guy in my local store. And always low-key bothered me that the Americans could bring more machine guns than me. I'm very happy to see that's no longer the case. And I am happy about the machine guns on tanks changes. I'm sure some variants will probably have a rule that says they get the full bonus against infantry, but having dealt with THAT Italian tank and watching it mulch my veteran squads with little difficulty. I will not miss that thing's reign of terror.

[@jdmcdonald4258]

Try the DAK Light Division list (Campaign The Western Desert p 115). You are allowed a max of x6 "Schutzen" squads. Each squad (CTWD p 93) is composed of 6-10 men, up to 2 men can have Lmgs and the first Lmg is free! They need the usual loaders and can be reg/vets. I'm not sure if we will be able to use these campaign books with Ed 3 rules.

[@daniellogue8365]

Does this mean you can't have singular tanks anymore?

[@patrikkarrman4323]

Is it known if this is intended to apply for all different types of armies? I am asking for my Brittish para's. :D

[@Dracowinges]

Bolt action 3ed?!? You have my complete attention! 👋

[@briarsandbantams]

I wouldn't put it past those wily SOBs at Warlord to have an "epic" version of Bolt Action in the works.

[@julianwarren7770]

I’m not sure it would be in their interest as there is an already competing 15mm scale game that is highly successful… Flames of War. I know there are other epic scale napoleonics/ACW etc, but not to the popularity level of Warlord games.

[@VioletMoonMediaWargames]

Considering Warlord own Skytrex, who used to produce micro-armour models.....

[@briarsandbantams]

@@VioletMoonMediaWargames Yeah, something along those lines is what I was thinking.

[@GraysunsWar]

Playing bolt action with 15mm models is already a thing, it's much more convenient as well

[@FarseerB1rdy]

@@julianwarren7770 isn’t FoW in a bad spot under its current rules? I’ve not heard anything good about V3. I was a huge V1 and V2 player but stopped many years ago.

[@pech2130]

I must admit, I'm hoping you renew your sibling rivalry in September

[@zielisawzielony9366]

Warlord seem like people with brain, compared to GW. Force org chart was great rule and I miss it.

[@markmooney9416]

Hypeeee

[@EvilTwinn]

I don't like this. I preferred the more strict organizations previously.

[@mascamuelassmith8088]

I must live in an alternative reality because all I am seeing for v3 is a worsened version and people seem to like whatever they throw at them

[@Wraithnine]

That's gonna be silly

[@Wraithnine]

So if I want to take some infantry, heavy weapons, artillery and armour I'm gonna have to take 5 rifle platoons with lieutenants that's a big chunk of points.

[@VioletMoonMediaWargames]

no, one rifle platoon mean you can also have one of each of the other platoons... but each platoon does need a commander of some type.

[@h.s.lafever3277]

@@VioletMoonMediaWargames i read it as half of your army will always by inf platoons.... if you have 4 inf platoons, then you can have 4 other platoons of any type, for a total of 8... BA is an infantry centric game...

[@VioletMoonMediaWargames]

@@h.s.lafever3277 Warlord have clarified, one infantry platoon allows for one of each of the other five platoons. So, 1 infantry, 1 armoured, 1 recce, 1 artillery or, 2 infantry, 2 engineer platoons (14 flamethrowers in 1250pt army!)

[@h.s.lafever3277]

@@VioletMoonMediaWargames cool, but now what am i going to do with 6 squads of infantry? maybe theyll do an apocalypse scale

[@VioletMoonMediaWargames]

@@h.s.lafever3277 well, Warlord do own Skytrex, who produce a 15mm WWII range.

[@MrMoustaffa]

Little late to the draw on this one huh?

[@thepiratepenguin4465]

The third edition feels more like a cash grab than correcting problems from the second edition. It is forcing people to buy more kits to meet the new requirements & In the current economy, I'm trying to reduce my hobby costs, not increase them.

[@KeyvanArian]

first

[@SquidFisT44]

Dakkka 🦑🦑🦑🦑🦑🤙👍

[@Wraithnine]

Don't like this new system, it's clunky

[@ytho5470]

3rd edition rules basically made the Finnish unplayable...awesome. snipers & rifles nerfed into 4+ base with no exceptional damage. V3 will reward spamming MGs,AT guns, and vehicles. So Germany will be OP

[@ytho5470]

They better make the sissi dirt cheap

[@erupendragon7376]

I’m getting 40K spam shit vibes. 5 Mmortar pit? / flamethrower spam like sisters?

[@VioletMoonMediaWargames]

1250 point us army, 20 dice, 14 flamethrowers...... thankfully, they have to walk across the board!